6
Design of Excitation Capacitance for Self-Excited Induction Generator Swati Devabhaktuni 1 , S.V.Jayaram kumar 2 1 Associate professor,Gokaraju Rangaraju Insitute Of Engineering And technology,Hyderabad,A.P.,India 2 Professor, J.N.T.Ucollege of engineering,Hyderabad,A.P.,India E-mail: [email protected] 1 , [email protected] 2 Abstract This paper presents simple and accurate approach to compute the minimum value of capacitance required for initiating the voltage build-up in a three-phase self- excited induction generator. Based on the steady-state equivalent circuit model different numerical methods for solving frequency are known from previous literature, which are of 6 th order polynomial. In this paper the order of the polynomial is reduced to the 4 th order frequency with a new, simple and direct method is developed to find the capacitance requirement. Critical values of the impedance and speed, below which the machine fails to self excite irrespective of the capacitance used, are found to exist. Closed form solutions for capacitance are derived for no-load and RL loads. Experimental results obtained on a 3.5kW induction machine confirm the feasibility and accuracy of the proposed method. Keywordscapacitance requirements, self-excitation, induction generator, steady state analysis, saturation 1. Introduction In recent years, the strong drive to conserve the global energy resources has initiated rigorous research on electricity generation using wind and mini hydro power. Much emphasis has been placed on the squirrel cage induction machine as the electromechanical energy converter in such generation schemes[1]. Notable advantages of the induction generator over the synchronous generator are low cost, robustness, absence of moving contacts and the need for d.c. excitation[4]. Owing to its many advantages, the self excited induction generator has emerged from among the known generators as suitable candidate to be driven by wind power. Beside its application as a generator, the principle of self-excitation can also be used in dynamic braking of a three phase induction motor. Therefore methods to analyze the performance of such machines are of considerable practical interest. The terminal capacitance on such machines must have a minimum value so that self-excitation is possible [5]. In is paper, a simple method to compute the capacitance requirements of a self-excited induction generator are introduced. The proposed method differs from previously published methods in the following aspects [4]: (a).It is based on the nodal admittance method for steady-state analysis of the SEIG without considering the saturation. (b).The load and excitation capacitance branches in the equivalent circuit are decoupled to facilitate the solution of the self-excited frequency. (c).No trial-and-error procedure is involved; hence it may be regarded as a direct method. (d).Reduced computational effort as only a 4thdegree polynomial need to be solved to yield the value of capacitance. When the nodal admittance concept is used in the analysis of the equivalent circuit, the process of self excitation is satisfied by equating the sum of the nodal admittances to zero. Using K.C.L at node 1.we get a complex equation from which two simultaneous equations for C and f are obtained [3] When the SEIG has successfully built up its voltage, the next question of interest is to maintain the terminal voltage at a preset value as the load increases. Using the same proposed method for computing capacitance, an iterative procedure is also developed for calculating the capacitance requirements of the SEIG for maintaining a given terminal voltage under load [2]. Experimented results obtained on a laboratory Swati Devabhaktuni et al, International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks,Vol 1(3), 264-269 264 ISSN:2249-5789

Self Excitation Capatance for Induction Generator

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

aaaaaa

Citation preview

  • Design of Excitation Capacitance for Self-Excited Induction Generator

    Swati Devabhaktuni1 , S.V.Jayaram kumar2

    1Associate professor,Gokaraju Rangaraju Insitute Of Engineering And technology,Hyderabad,A.P.,India

    2Professor, J.N.T.Ucollege of engineering,Hyderabad,A.P.,India

    E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

    Abstract

    This paper presents simple and accurate approach to

    compute the minimum value of capacitance required

    for initiating the voltage build-up in a three-phase self-

    excited induction generator. Based on the steady-state

    equivalent circuit model different numerical methods

    for solving frequency are known from previous

    literature, which are of 6th order polynomial. In this

    paper the order of the polynomial is reduced to the 4th

    order frequency with a new, simple and direct method

    is developed to find the capacitance requirement.

    Critical values of the impedance and speed, below

    which the machine fails to self excite irrespective of the

    capacitance used, are found to exist. Closed form

    solutions for capacitance are derived for no-load and

    RL loads. Experimental results obtained on a 3.5kW

    induction machine confirm the feasibility and accuracy

    of the proposed method. Keywords capacitance requirements, self-excitation, induction

    generator, steady state analysis, saturation

    1. Introduction In recent years, the strong drive to conserve the

    global energy resources has initiated rigorous research

    on electricity generation using wind and mini hydro

    power. Much emphasis has been placed on the squirrel

    cage induction machine as the electromechanical

    energy converter in such generation schemes[1].

    Notable advantages of the induction generator over the

    synchronous generator are low cost, robustness,

    absence of moving contacts and the need for d.c.

    excitation[4]. Owing to its many advantages, the self

    excited induction generator has emerged from among

    the known generators as suitable candidate to be driven

    by wind power.

    Beside its application as a generator, the

    principle of self-excitation can also be used in dynamic

    braking of a three phase induction motor. Therefore methods to analyze the performance of such machines

    are of considerable practical interest. The terminal capacitance on such machines must have a minimum

    value so that self-excitation is possible [5].

    In is paper, a simple method to compute the

    capacitance requirements of a self-excited induction

    generator are introduced. The proposed method differs

    from previously published methods in the following

    aspects [4]:

    (a).It is based on the nodal admittance method for

    steady-state analysis of the SEIG without considering

    the saturation.

    (b).The load and excitation capacitance branches in the

    equivalent circuit are decoupled to facilitate the

    solution of the self-excited frequency.

    (c).No trial-and-error procedure is involved; hence it

    may be regarded as a direct method.

    (d).Reduced computational effort as only a 4thdegree

    polynomial need to be solved to yield the value of

    capacitance.

    When the nodal admittance concept is used in

    the analysis of the equivalent circuit, the process of self

    excitation is satisfied by equating the sum of the nodal

    admittances to zero. Using K.C.L at node 1.we get a

    complex equation from which two simultaneous

    equations for C and f are obtained [3]

    When the SEIG has successfully built up its

    voltage, the next question of interest is to maintain the

    terminal voltage at a preset value as the load increases.

    Using the same proposed method for computing

    capacitance, an iterative procedure is also developed

    for calculating the capacitance requirements of the

    SEIG for maintaining a given terminal voltage under

    load [2]. Experimented results obtained on a laboratory

    Swati Devabhaktuni et al, International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks,Vol 1(3), 264-269

    264

    ISSN:2249-5789

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • machine are presented to verify the accuracy and

    validity of the present approach. This paper introduces

    a new and simple and direct method of finding

    minimum capacitance required for self excitation.

    2. Three Phase Self-excited Induction

    Generator Model

    For the modelling of the self-excited induction

    generators, the main flux path saturation is accounted

    for while the saturation in the leakage flux path , the

    iron and rotational losses are neglected. Therefore in

    the following analysis the parameters of the induction

    machine are assumed constant except the magnetizing

    inductance which varies with saturation [5].

    2.1. Steady-state circuit model:

    The steady state circuit of a self-excited induction

    generator under RL load is shown in Fig.1

    Fig.1.Equivalent circuit of SEIG

    Here the machine core losses are having been

    ignored. Considering these losses increases the

    mathematical work involved in obtaining the results,

    without increasing the accuracy of the analysis

    substantially. All the circuit parameters are assumed to

    be constant and unaffected by saturation. Machine

    parameters except capacitance and frequency all are

    known values [6].

    2.2Mathematical model

    Fig1.shows the per phase equivalent circuit

    commonly used for the steady state analysis of the

    SEIG.For the machine to self excite on no load, the

    excitation capacitance must be larger then some

    minimum value, this minimum value decreasing as

    speed decreases[4].For on load self-excitation, the

    impedance line corresponding to the parallel

    combination of the load impedance and excitation

    capacitance should intersect the magnetisation characteristic well into the saturation region[7].The

    condition yields the minimum value of excitation

    capacitance below which the SEIG fails to self-excite

    For the circuit shown in Fig.1.,by Kirchhoffs law,

    the sum of currents at node(1) should be equal to zero,

    hence

    VY=0 (1)

    Where Y is the net admittance given by

    Y=YL+YC+Y2 (2)

    The terminal voltage cannot be equal to zero hence

    Y=0 (3)

    By equating the real and imaginary terms in

    equation(3) respectively to zero.

    Real(YL+YC+Y2)=0

    Imag(YL+YC+Y)=0

    2.3. Proposed method to find general solution for

    capacitance

    The real part yields

    A4f4+A3f

    3+A2f

    2+A1f+A0=0 (4)

    And the imaginary part yields

    C=+

    3+2+ (5)

    Y2=(+ )

    ++; (6)

    Slip, =

    (7)

    Where k=30;

    The derivation for these constant coefficients A4 to

    A0 is given in Appendix-A.Equation(4) can be solved

    numerically to yield all the real and complex

    roots.Only the real roots have physical significance and

    the largest positive real root yields the frequency. The

    corresponding capacitance can be calculated.

    An investigation on the solutions for various load

    impedances and speed conditions reveals that for RL

    loads,there are in general two real roots and a pair of

    complex roots.

    The computed results reveal that there exist

    critical values of load impedance or speed below which

    the induction generator fails to excite irrespective of the

    value of capacitance used.

    3. Computed Results and Discussions In this paper, the computed results are obtained by the

    procedures and calculations outlined above, number of

    experiments are conducted using three phase induction

    machine coupled with a wind turbine. The induction

    machine was three, phase3.5kW, 415V, 7.5A,

    1500r.p.m, star connected stator winding.

    A 3- variable capacitor bank or a single capacitor was

    connected to the machine terminals to obtain self-

    excited induction generator action.

    The measured machine parameters were:

    Swati Devabhaktuni et al, International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks,Vol 1(3), 264-269

    265

    ISSN:2249-5789

  • r1=11.78; r2=3.78; L1=L2=10.88H. Lm=227.39H

    Consider the case when the machine is driven at rated

    speed with a connected load impedance of 200.Solve

    the frequency polynomial using MATLAB software.

    The solution yielded the following complex and real

    roots.

    f1=50.06Hz;

    f2=17.33Hz;

    f3=1.275+j0.3567Hz;

    f4=1.275-j0.3567Hz;

    As only the real roots have physical significance and

    the largest real root yields the maximum frequency that

    corresponds to the minimum frequency.

    Since all these values and capacitance and sufficient

    to guarantee self-excitation of induction generator, it

    follows that the minimum capacitor value required. It is

    seen that only the larger positive real root gives the

    feasible value of the capacitance. The smaller real root

    on the other hand gives the value of the excitation

    capacitance above which the machine fails to excite.

    However such condition is unpractical as the

    corresponding excitation current would far exceed the

    rated current of the machine.

    If the polynomial is having no real roots, then no

    excitation is possible. Also, there is a minimum speed

    value, below which equation (4) have no real roots.

    Correspondingly no excitation is possible.

    It is noted that for R-L loads, there are in general

    two real roots and one pair of complex conjugate roots.

    This restricts the set of two capacitors. It is also noted

    that Ns

  • Fig.3.shows the computed variations of capacitance

    with the load impedance. It is noticed that, in general,

    capacitance increases with decrease in load impedance.

    The increase in more gradual at large values of

    impedance but becomes more abrupt as the critical

    value 80 is approached.

    Fig.4 shows the computed variation of self-excited

    frequencies with speed for load impedance 200.Again

    a region of no-generation is identified and the critical

    speed yields the repeated roots of the polynomial may

    be termed the critical speed for a given load impedance.

    Fig.5.shows the computed variations of minimum

    capacitance with speed at different load impedances. It

    is seen that the capacitance increases rapidly with the

    decrease in speed. At speeds nearly to the critical value,

    minimum capacitance is very large, typically hundreds

    of microfarads. In practice, however it is unlikely that

    the SEIG will be operated at such low speeds.

    As for the no-load case close solutions exist for the

    self excitation frequency which is maximum and

    capacitance which is minimum. The self excitation

    frequency and the critical speed for the inductive load

    were same as for the no-load case.

    Fig.6.Variation of capacitance with highest real root

    of frequency

    Fig.7.Variation of capacitance with lowest real root of

    frequency

    Fig.6. and fig.7 the minimum capacitance required for

    the self-excited induction generator. These values can

    be used to predict the theoretically the minimum values

    of the terminal capacitance required for self-

    excitation.Ofcourse,for stable operation of the machine

    C must be slightly greater than the minimum

    capacitance. Exact expressions for capacitor values

    under no-load, resistive loads and corresponding output

    frequencies are derived.

    Fig.8.Variation of magnetizing reactance with load

    impedance

    Fig.8.shows the variation of magnetizing reactance with the value of the load impedance. As the load is

    increasing the magnetizing reactance is also increasing.

    Below the value of load impedance 80 there will not

    be any excitation.

    Fig.9.Variation of magnetizing reactance with

    Capacitance

    Fig.9..shows the variation magnetization reactance

    of generator with various capacitances .If the

    capacitance value is below the minimum value of the

    capacitance, the magnetization reactance is greater the

    unsaturated reactance, in which case the machine is

    failed to excite and the voltage will be zero.

    Fig.10.Variation of Capacitance with slip

    Fig.10.shows the variation of the capacitance with

    slip. Capacitance is maximum having slip s=1.and then

    Swati Devabhaktuni et al, International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks,Vol 1(3), 264-269

    267

    ISSN:2249-5789

  • decreases as the slip decreases. As the slip decreases

    the values of the frequency also decreases.

    Since only one single root is required, the Newton-

    Raphson method was used in solving the polynomial

    equation. Depending on the circuit conditions, the final

    value of the frequency could be obtained in 4to10

    iterations. It is advised to use MATLAB software to

    solve the polynomial.

    4. Experimental results And Discussions

    Experiments were performed on the above

    mentioned induction machine to verify the validity of

    the computed results. It is found that if a sufficiently

    large residual flux existed in the rotor core, the machine

    would always self-excite whenever the capacitance was

    slightly higher than the computed value.

    The value of the capacitance required for the

    machine to self excite from the computation result is

    obtained as C=14.35F.Similrly from the experiment,

    using the magnetization curve, computed resulted is of

    C=15F.Hence proved that the experimental

    capacitance value must be greater than the computed

    capacitance value. The magnetization curve drawn

    from the experimental result is as shown in Fig.11.

    Fig.11.Magnetization Characteristic

    The calculation of air-gap voltage is given in

    APPENDIX-A.For different values of capacitances the

    experiment were conducted and it was found that the

    value of the frequencies calculated from the polynomial

    and experimental verification are nearly equal.

    Very good correlation between the computed

    and experimental results is observed as shown in fig.12.

    This verifies the accuracy of the proposed method for

    computing minimum value of the capacitance for

    SEIG. Experimental Frequency Calculated Frequency

    29.98 30.45

    37.01 36.67

    41.5 41.2

    47.11 47.01

    49.88 50.09

    Fig.12.Comparision between Experimental and

    calculated frequency

    5. Computer Algorithm In order, to develop a computer algorithm to

    determine capacitance for self-excitation of SEIG using

    the techniques described in section it is desirable to

    have a program or subroutine to calculate the roots of a

    polynomial with complex coefficients .The flow chart

    of the computer program is given by

    Fig13.Flow chart to determine the frequency and

    capacitance

    Swati Devabhaktuni et al, International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks,Vol 1(3), 264-269

    268

    ISSN:2249-5789

  • 6. CONCLUSIONS

    A method for computing the minimum value of

    capacitance to initiate self-excitation in the SEIG has

    been described. The method is based on the steady state

    equivalent circuit, but features the separate

    consideration of the load and excitation capacitance

    branches, which enables the frequency to be

    determined by solving a single 4th order polynomial

    .Computation studies on the experimental machine

    reveals that there exist critical values of load

    impedance and speed below which self-excitation is

    impossible irrespective of the capacitance used. Using

    the same analysis technique, an iterative procedure has

    also been developed for estimating the capacitance

    requirements for maintaining the terminal voltage

    constant when the SEIG is on load. The validity of the

    proposed methods are confirmed by experimental

    results obtained on a 3.5kW laboratory induction

    machine.

    APPENDIX-A

    To compute the coefficients A4 to A0 of

    equation(4),the following equations are first defined:

    a=2k(LMr1+L1r1+L2r1+LMr2+Lr2+rLLM+rLL2);

    b=-2 N*rL(LM+L2)

    c=-8 3k(LLMr1+LL2r1+LLMr2-rLL1LM-rLL2LM)

    d=-8 3N(rLL1LM+ rLL2L1+ rLL2LM+LL2LM)

    e=-2krLr1r2

    g=-42k(L1LM+L1L2+L2LM+LLM+LL2)

    h=42N(L1LM+L1L2+L2LM+LLM+LL2)

    i=r1r2+rLr2 j=-16

    4k(LL1LM+LL2LM+LL2L1)

    l=164N(LL1LM+LL1L2+LL2LM)

    m=42k(Lr1r2+rLLMr1+rLL1r2+rLL1r2+rLL2r1+rLLmr2)

    p=-42NrLLMr1;

    A4=cg-aj

    A3=dg+hc+-al-bj;

    A2=eg+hd+ic-ma-bl;

    A1=he+id-pa-bm

    A0=ie-bp;

    Air gap voltage: The piecewise linearization of magnetization

    characteristic of machine is given by

    E1=0 Xm260

    E1=1632.58-6.2Xm 233.2Xm 260

    E1=1314.98-4.8Xm 214.6Xm 233.2

    E1=1183.11-4.22Xm 206Xm 214.6

    E1=1120.4-3.9.2Xm 203.5Xm 206

    E1=557.65-1.144Xm 197.3Xm 203.5

    E1=320.56-0.578Xm Xm 197.3

    References

    [1]. A.K. At Jabri and A.I. Alodah, Capacitance

    requirements for isolated self-excited induction

    generator, Proc. IEE, Vol. 137,Part B, No. 3,

    pp.154-159, May 1990.

    [2] AI-Bahrani, A.H., and Malik, N.H, Selection of the

    Excitation Capacitor for Dynamic Braking

    ofInduction Machines, Proc. IEE, Vol. 140, Part.

    B,No. 1, pp. 1-6, 1993

    [3] AI-Bahrani, A.H., and Malik, N.H, Steady state

    analysis and Performance Characteristics of a three

    phase Induction Generator Self-Excited with a single

    capacitor, IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, Vol4,

    No. 4, pp. 725-732, 1990

    [4] T.F. Chan, Capacitance requirements of Self-

    Excited Induction Generators, IEEE Trans. on

    Energy Conversion, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 304-310, June

    1992.

    [5]. A.K. Tandon, S.S. Murthy, and G.J. Berg, Steady

    State Analysis of Capacitor Self Excited

    InductionGenerators, IEEE Trans. on Power App.

    and Sys.Vol. PAS-103, No. 3, pp. 612- 618, 1984.

    [6]. Rahim, Y.H.A., Excitation of Isolated Three-phase

    Induction Generator by a single capacitor, IEE

    Proc.,Pt. B., Vol.140, No. 1, pp. 44-50, 1993.

    [7]. Malik, N.H; and Mazi, A.A. Capacitance

    requirements for isolated Self excited Induction

    Generators, IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion,Vol.

    EC-2, No. 1, pp. 62-69, 1987.

    Swati Devabhaktuni et al, International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks,Vol 1(3), 264-269

    269

    ISSN:2249-5789