Seminar s.g Iron

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    1/32

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    2/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    2

    2. LITERATURE SURVEY

    2.1 HISTORY OF S.G IRON

    The first announcement of successful production of Spheroidal Graphite structures in grey cast

    irons was made by H.Morragh of British cast iron Research Association in the year 1948 at the

    American Foundrymens society s Annual convention in Phladelphia, U.S.A.The process

    involved a treatment of low sulphur hyper- eutectic cast iron with cerium, which was added as

    mish metal shortly before casting. In same convention, T.M Wickenden of the International

    Nickel Company, U.S.A disclosed that their researchers had also found out a method of

    production of Spheroidal Graphite structure in the as cast condition by the introduction in the

    iron, either hyper- eutectic, of a small but effective amount of magnesium or a magnesium

    containing addition such as a nickel-magnesium alloy. Since then the latter process has been

    found to be a commercially viable process and is now universally used for the production of

    Spheroidal cast-iron.

    The mechanism of graphite nodule formation however is still a matter of great controversy.

    Various theories have been put forward by various researchers but none of them have gained

    universal acceptance.

    Basically S.G iron is produced by noduliging grey iron. Thus a melt of grey-iron is first of all

    desulphurised. Desulphurization has to be invariably carried out and recarburization has to be

    done if necessary. Once the base iron of required composition is ready, it is suitably treated for

    spheroidization. Post-inoculations are then carried out if required and the melt is poured in to

    the moulds as early as possible to avoid fading effect.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    3/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    3

    2.2 DIFFERENT BETWEEN GREY IRON AND S.G IRON

    Engineering application of cast iron have been traditionally based upon gray (flake

    graphite) irons providing a range of tensile strengths between about 150N/mm2 and 400N/mm2

    with recommended design stress in tensile application.

    In contrast ductile irons have tensile strengths ranging from 350 to 1500N/mm2 with

    good elongation and high toughness. They now account for about 25% of iron casting

    production serving in safety critical applications where they have replaced steel casting,

    forging.

    In short we can say that the highest mechanical properties of grey iron are the starting

    points for S.G iron castings.

    Gray Iron Structure S.G. Iron Structure

    2.3 PRORERTIES OF S.G IRON

    The S.G. family iron has several interesting properties. These are given below High strength (in some cases even greater than steel) Adequate ductility.

    Superior castability. Excellent machinability. Lower density then that of steel. Superior surface lubrication properties. Better damping characteristics.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    4/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    4

    3. PRODUCTION OF S.G. IRON

    3.1 SLECTION OF CHEMICAL COMPOSITION

    The choice of chemical composition in alloys started with the aim of obtaining a carbon-free as-cast structure. The other factors that are considered are the effect of the various elements on

    the shape and distribution of graphite and the structure of the matrix. All factors are further

    affected by cooling rate.

    CARBON: - It strongly promoted carbide free as cast structure. The carbon content for the

    commercial ductile iron is form 3.0 to 4.0%, although much narrower limits are usually desired.

    Nodule counts are directly affected by the carbon content greater number of spheroidsformation at the higher carbon contents. Increasing the carbon content also increases

    castability by improving fluidity and feeding. The carbon content level should be co-related

    with the carbon equivalent formula:-

    CE = %C + 1/3 %Si + 1/3 %P

    Carbon equivalents greatly is excess 4.3 promote the development and growth of graphite

    spheroids. Since graphite is far less dense than molten iron these spheroids may be become

    buoyant and float toward the cope surface of casting, resulting in gross carbon segregation,

    floating, as this phenomenon is called is prevent in analyses having carbon equivalents greater

    than 4.60 and in section sizes greater than 1inch.

    SILICON:- It is a very strong promoter of carbide free as-cast structure. Apart from promoting

    graphite and refining its distribution, silicon is the most potent beneficial element in increasing

    strength and up to 4% will also increase as-cast ductility. Silicon being ferrite stabilizer,

    increases hardness, particularly in the annealed condition. Silicon also influences the

    distribution of graphite spheroids. The higher the silicon content, the higher the nodule count

    and the more the ferrite content. However, higher silicon content is known to promote chunky

    type graphite resulting in deterioration in properties of heavy ductile iron castings other

    potentially objectionable influences of increasing silicon content are reduced impact energy,

    increasing impact transition temperature and decreased thermal conductivity. The general

    range for commercial production is specified at around 1.8% to 2.8%.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    5/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    Typical carbon and silicon range of S.G.Iron Casting

    MANGANESE: - The only single aim in selection of the manganese percentage is to avoid as-

    cast carbide. It must be preferably kept below 0.5%. A side benefit of lowered manganesecontent is the lowering of the tendency of hydrogen pick- up and there by minimization of the

    danger of pin hole. It must be noted that the manganese content must never be chosen with

    the aim of controlling the matrix structure.

    SULPHUR: -The control of sulphur for the production of the S.G iron is highly essential. If base

    metal contains higher than 0.015% S are used in production of S.G iron, uneconomical

    amounts of magnesium or other nodulizing agents would be required and problems such as

    dross defect control get magnified. The base iron in-mould process should have sulphur

    contents within the 0.01% range.

    PHOSPHORUS: - Phosphorus decreases ductility, toughness and weldability and it is

    detrimental to casting soundness. For these reasons most specifications tolerate a maximum of

    0.03% only. It is however, a good practice to keep phosphorus content below 0.04%. In certain

    cases where reduced creep rate, increased thermal conductivity and abrasion resistance are

    required, the phosphorus content should be much more.

    MAGNESIUM: - Magnesium is added for nodularization generally in the alloyed form. It has

    been extensively reported in literature that the residual magnesium content in the S.G iron

    formed should be between 0.02% to 0.06% while calculating the amount of magnesium

    alloyed, required factors such as temperature of treatment, the efficiency of the treatment

    process and the percentage of the magnesium in the alloy will have to be taken in to

    consideration.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    6/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    Relationship between S and Mg in ductile iron

    CARBON EQUIVALENT: - Selection of proper carbon equivalent depend to the great extent on

    the section thickness of the casting produced. As the casting section increases the carbon

    equivalent decreases. It varies from 4.2 for a section thickness of 80 to 100m.m to as high as 5

    for a 3m.m section thickness.

    Recommended carbon equivalent values for ductile iron castings of various thickness

    Optimum pouring temperatures for different minimum section thickness

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    7/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    3.2 ALLOYING ELEMENT AND THEIR EFFECTS

    ELEMENT NORMAL

    ADDITION

    GENERAL EFFECTS OF ELEMENTS

    COPPER 0.5 to 2.0 Strong pearlite promoter Increases poof stress Good tensile strength and hardness with no

    embitterment

    NICKEL 0.5 to 2.0 Mild pearlite promoter Increases proof stress but little effect on

    tensile strength Danger of embitterment with larger addition

    in excess of about 2 percent

    TIN 0.05 to 0.1 Very strong pearlite promoter Increases poof stress and hard ness but

    danger of embitterment giving low tensile

    strength elongation values

    MOLYBDENUM 0.2 to 1.0 Mild pearlite promoter Forms intercellular carbides especially in

    heavy section Increases poof stress and hardness Danger of embitterment giving low tensile

    strength and elongation Improve elevated temperature properties

    ARSENIC 0.05 to 0.1 Very strong pearlite promoter but not used

    commercial possible , risk of embitterment

    ANTIMONY 0.01 to 0.05 Very strong pearlite promoter but not used

    commercial in S.G iron

    CHROMIUM

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    8/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    8

    3.3 SUBVERSIBLE ELEMENT AND ITS NEUTRALIZATION

    The aim when production good quality ductile iron is to produce an iron having a fine

    distribution of well formed nodules in the structure. The process of nodular graphite may reduce

    mechanical properties, the reduction depending of non nodular or flake graphite which may

    present ISO 945 and ASTM 247 standard classify graphite according to a schematic

    presentation of the observed structure and the ASTM standard contains enable control

    personnel to assess graphite nodule number and size rapidly.

    Small amount of element such as lead, bismuth, antimony and titanium singly or in combination

    prevent magnesium having the desired modularizing effect and hence are often referred to as

    subversive or interfering elements. The effects of subversive elements are cumulative. Small

    amounts of two or more subversive elements present in amounts which individually have no

    signification effect, together may adversely affected the formation of nodular graphite. The

    subversive effect of some elements:-

    Particularly titanium, lead and bismuth increasing as the size of the cast section increases. For

    this reason acceptable levels can not be quoted and the effects of using furnace charge

    materials controlling subversive elements can be evaluated by determination of the effect on

    graphite structures in test bar or casting. When the elements are present individually,

    subversive effects are likely to occur if the following levels are acceded lead 0.0005%, bismuth

    0.002%, antimony 0.004 and titanium 0.1%.

    The effect of subversible elements can be neutralized by the adding of a small amount of

    cerium (0.002 to 0.005%) in addition to the magnesium.

    Cerium contents above about 0.01% will results in a reduce nodule number and increasing risk

    of carbide formation, so it is important not to add too much

    3.4 MELTING PRACTICES

    The relationship of melting practice to the type and amount of spheroiding alloy used is of

    importance to casting and its physical properties

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    9/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    9

    Cupola melting is the most common methods of melting for melting for ductile iron, moreover

    electrical induction furnace are in use in a number of foundries.

    ACID CUPOLA MELTING:-Using acid cupolas necessitates close control over charge

    materials and coke since the acid slag produced are not capable of reducing the sulpher

    content of the iron. This result in sulpher contents of 0.06 to 0.12 present, which, if not lowered,

    necessitates, the use of increasing amounts of spheroidizing alloy. Acid cupola melting,

    however, is capable of controlling the readily oxidizable elements in the charge, such as

    chromium and manganese. Since it is a more oxidizable process than the basic cupola

    operation. Because of the moderate carbon pick up in acid base cupola melting and the desired

    base iron chemistry , the use of pig iron of return is some what limited close composition

    control and high metal temperatures, however can be produce without the need of a hot blast.

    BASIC CUPOLA MELTING:- Basic cupola melting is characterized by the definite advantage

    of sulpher control. Average sulpher content of the basic melt before spheradizing ranges from

    0.025 to 0.035%. this decreased sulpher level in the melt is obtained at the expense of higher

    operating cost , higher silicon losses during melting , less effective temperature and

    composition control and a greater carbon pickup during melting.

    ELECTRICAL MELTING:-Electrical melting has provided to be a clean and reliable melt. It

    has also offered the greatest flexibility for melting irons of different grades.

    Electrical arc furnaces have been found to be less popular than induction heated ones. Their

    batch type operation and noise pollution have been the contributing factors. The facts that it

    has found some application both as a primary melter and as a duplexer is mainly due to its time

    prove reliability.

    Electrical induction furnace have been the most common melting units for the production of S.Giron , both in simplex operation in small foundries and as duplexing units. The coreless type is

    being used for primary melting and a channel furnace is being used for duplexing .High

    frequency units have been found to be good form the metallurgical point of view but are

    associated with high costs. However, where furnace capacities under one tone are desirable

    and speed of melting is a consideration, than the high frequency is to be preferable. The

    coreless line frequency induction furnace has been found to be the best possible furnace for

    melting of base iron for S.G. iron production. The low frequency ensures better stirring thusresulting in homogenization melting.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    10/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    1

    3.5 CHARGE MATERIALS

    The average metallic charge for ductile base iron consists of pig iron, steel scrap, foundry

    returns, ferrosilicon and other ferro alloys if necessary and carburizes if added with the charge.

    Pig- iron has been found to be a significant contributor to the control of chemical composition.

    The pig-iron for S.G iron production must be of a selective grade in view of very small amount

    of sulpher and phosphorus present in sponge iron. There is trend to use sponge iron in place of

    pig iron in S.G iron production.

    3.6 POURING TEMPERATURE

    Pouring temperature depends on the casting section. As the section thickness increasing, the

    pouring temperature required decreases. For minimum section thickness up to 20 mm the

    pouring temperature can be vary from 13500c to 14800c.

    3.7 DESULPHURIHATION

    Economical production of quality S.G iron can be take place only with consistently low sulphur

    contents, with high sulphur content problem of dross defects gets magnified. The iron therefore,

    must be thoroughly desulphurization before spheroidization treatment is carried out .Some of

    the practical desulphurization agents are

    Soda ash Caustic soda Burnt lime Lime stone Calcium carbide

    A fine grained calcium carbide is desirable so as to present the greatest possible surface area

    and the highest possible temperature has been found to be favorable for desulphurization .It

    has also been known that the carbide must be kept in motion to present unreaceted carbide

    surface to the dissolve sulfides. An addition of 1.5 to 2% calcium carbide has been reported to

    have reduced a base sulphur content of 0.12% to 0.01%.

    Soda ash has been used to bring down sulphur from 0.06% to 0.08% range. Further reduction

    has not been possible by this compound. It was also found to cause environmental problems.

    Various techniques have been evolved with the sole aim of effecting mixing and causing the

    reaction between the molten metal and the desulphurization agents.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    11/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    11

    3.8 NODULARIZING MATERIAL AND NODULARIZATION TECHNIQUES

    With commercial and technical growth of S.G. Iron, there has been an evolutioan in the ranges

    and character of nodularizing materials and methods unlike in the past the newer nodularizers

    and processes lend to better control over process variables.

    Nodularizing Materials.

    Magnesium and the rare earths have been integral parts of S.G. iron production from its

    earliest stages. As mentioned earlier, magnesium has, since than been found to be a

    commercially viable nudularizer. However, to utilize the ability of cerium in neutralizing the

    deleterious effects of subversive elements. Some alloys of magnesium used for nodularization

    also contain small amounts of cerium.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    12/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    12

    Basically two classes of nodularizers have evolved

    (i) Elemental nodulizers where the magnesium is in unalloyed form.

    (ii) Alloyed nudulizers in which the magnesium is alloyed with either silicon or nickel

    with or without rare earths.

    The magnesium content in the alloy in these alloys is an important factor. Numerous

    investigators have demonstrated that as the magnesium content of the alloy decreases, the

    magnesium recovery associated with in use increases. In Indian conditions, the 9% Mg-Fe-Si

    alloy is reported to give good results. The magnesium recovery is also dependent on the

    treatment temperature. Higher the treatment temperature, lesser will the magnesium recovery.

    0.76 x (S% in base metal S% residual) + residual Mg%Mg Recovery % =

    Mg% added.

    The amount of nodulizer required is given by the formula :

    % nudulizer alloy = E Mga

    Mgs Mgr %*%

    %%

    Where Mgr = residual magnesium

    Mgs = The amount of magnesium that will reacts with sulpher

    (% Mgs = 075 x % of sulphur in base Iron)

    Mga = Magnesium in the alloy

    E = Efficiency of the processes.

    Problems associated with the addition of magnesium :

    There are a number of inherent problems with the addition of magnesium and much of the

    investigative work resulting to the production of ductile iron has been associated with ways and

    means of over coming these problems.

    1. Low Boiling Point Magnesium has a boiling point of about 1107oC which is lower thanthe temperature of the molten cast iron being reacted. This pressure of magnesium at

    the treatment temperature, prevent easy solution of magnesium and result in

    considerable agitation and even violence during the reaction.

    2. Low solubility - magnesium is only sparingly soluble in molten and solid cast iron, so

    the use of alloys based on iron and magnesium is not possible.

    3. Lower specific gravity The specific gravity of magnesium only 174 in comparison with

    a value above 7 for cast iron. When added to cast iron, magnesium or its low density

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    13/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    13

    alloys tend to float giving rise to excessive losses caused by local boiling and

    oxidation.

    4. Fume As well as the fume and agitation associated with the addition of magnesium

    or its alloys, excessive magnesium oxide fume is also formed. Although this is not toxic

    it does result in a deterioration of working conditions in the found and is potential

    problem unless adequate fume collection equipment is installed.

    5. Dross formation During the treatment sulphides and oxides of magnesium are

    formed which may remain suspended in the metal and subsequently lead to the

    formulation of dross type defects in the casting. In addition, a magnesium oxides rich

    skin is constantly being formed on the treated metal surface and this, in combination

    with other oxides, results in the formation of refractory type complexes which can also

    cause dross defect in castings.

    Basic methods of overcoming the problem:

    All the work carried out on improving the efficiency of the Mg treatment has been carried out

    along with following lines:

    1. To alloy the magnesium in order to increase the specific gravity and reduce the

    tendency for the addition to float on the molten iron and control the rate of the action of

    the Mg thereby reducing the reactions of violence and increasing recovery. Alloy

    includes the classical nickel magnesium alloy containing 15% Mg, a range of Cu-Mg

    alloys and also the ferrosilicon magnesium range which, are the most commonly used

    materials for productions.

    2. The magnesium alloy may be submerged, below the metal surface thereby eliminating

    the floating effect. This enables alloys of high magnesium content to be employed

    typical examples being Mg/Si containing 30-40% mg, magnesium impregnated coke

    (42% Mg) and Mg sponge-Iron briquettes (15% Mg). Further advantages of thispractice may be achieved by increasing the depth of metal in the ladle. This gives

    grater metal head which increases the time of passage through the molten Iron,

    resulting in an increased Mg recovery.

    3. Mg or Mg rich alloys may be impacted or dispersed into the molten Iron, which reduces

    the reactions violence and provides an extended passage time for the Mg to react with

    molten metal, pure Mg can be employed in this named

    4. The pressure above the metal in the ladle can be in increased to a level exceeding thevapour pressure of a magnesium at the temperature of treatment. This eliminates the

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    14/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    14

    boiling effect of magnesium and results on a quite reaction and good magnesium

    recovery. Pure Mg is as used in such application.

    5. Other methods have been devised where by the reaction rate and hence violence

    associated with the addition of Mg is controlled, either in the mould itself or in a

    specially designed vessel.

    Techniques of Adding Magnesium to Molten Metal

    In general the simple treatment methods can be satisfactory used with the more costly low

    magnesium content alloys. Special purpose equipment enable cheaper, higher magnesium

    content materials to be employed, but often introduces additional metal handling, maintenance

    and control cost.

    In Direct Pour On Technique :

    This is the simplest technique of adding magnesium where by the metal is poured directly on

    the weighed magnesium alloy. It requires no special equipment and conventional foundry

    ladles can be used satisfactory. Temperature loss during treatment is also at a minimum, but

    the technique can only be employed with the higher density alloys such as nickel magnesium,

    copper magnesium and magnesium ferrosilicon to produce a magnesium recovery of about 25-

    30%.

    Since conventional foundry ladles are employed the technique can be readily applied to any

    metal weight which can be of advantages in jobbing work where it is often impossible to

    programme metal production to give a consistent metal demand.

    IN DIRECT POUR ON TECHNIQUE

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    15/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    1

    SAND WHICH PROCESS:

    The aim of this technique, which is basically an extension of the pour on methods is to produce

    a higher magnesium recovery by holding down the magnesium alloy for a period of time and

    also producing a localized low temperature area. The technique consists of building a pocket

    into the bottom the Mg alloys and a cover of steel scrap (2-3%) of metal weight or a steel or

    ductile iron plate. The metal stream from the furnace must be directed a way from the pocket to

    obtain the maximum benefit the pocket should be deep enough to contain all of the alloy and

    steel scrap and latter should be of small size in order to produce a high packing density. The

    main disadvantages of metal temperature resulting from the scrap. The loss of about 0.1%

    carbon due to the dilution effect of the steel scrap should also be borne in mind. The depth and

    surface area of the formed cavity must be sufficient to contain the Mg alloy and steel scrap.

    The metal stream is directed into the empty half of the ladle which then produces a smooth flow

    of metal across the steel scrap, thereby precuenting premature reaction.

    SAND WHICH PROCESS

    COVER TRIGGER PROCESS :

    This is a modification of the sandwich process, but instead of a steel cover a layer of an inert

    materials such as calcium carbide is placed over the magnesium alloy. The ensure a uniform

    layer of alloy it is advisable to employ the magnesium-ferrosilicon in the form of graded fines. It

    is found that when metal is poured into the empty half of the ladle and subsequently flows over

    the refractory bridge, the inert layer is not dislodge and reaction of magnesium does not

    commences using this technique the ladle can be completely filled and if necessary transported

    to suitable casting station before reaction is initiated. This has been carried out by

    dislodgements of the calcium carbide or inert-cover crust and is accomplished by pricking with

    a long diameter steel bar or alternatively, by the insertion of a graphite rod into the treatment

    chamber before addition of the inert cover. In this instance, when the reaction is required to be

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    16/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    1

    started the graphite bar is nearly, twisted and removed from the chamber when reaction

    commences.

    If the correct of alloy fines and inert cover are employed a relatively quiet reaction results and

    magnesium recoveries of the order of 50% can be achieved, even with the conventional

    foundry ladle having a low height to diameter ratio. These benefits have to be offset by the

    extra core required in adding the materials to the ladle, and the removal of the calcium carbide

    rich slag, which is produced during treatment.

    THE TUNDISH COVER :

    Significant improvement in the treatment efficiency of the saved which process can be

    achieved by the use of a suitably designed cover to the ladle, component with the simple open

    laddle design, the tundish ever system offer greater consistency and increased magnesium

    recovery together with significant reductions in fume and glare. The differences between

    conventional ladle and tundish ladle operation are.

    The tundish cover operates on the simple principle limiting the amount of air available for west

    full combination with magnesium. Magnesium recovery is increased to between 60% and 65%

    with accompanying cost savings.

    Iron enters the ladle through a suitably sized hole in the tundish which forms an integral part of

    the ladle cover. The entry hole is so positioned as to ensure that the first iron entering the ladle

    is directed away from the treatment alloy. The diameter of the entry hole is designed to regulate

    the iron flow and ensure that the tandish remains full throughout most of the magnesium

    reaction there by limiting the in grass of air. Good sealing of the cover with the ladle and the

    use of an overlapping opron are design features which improve the efficiency of the system.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    17/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    1

    PLUNGING OR SUBMERGING TECHNIQUES

    They are used with alloys of higher magnesium content (15 to 50%) which have low densities.

    There are a number of operational factors to consider with these techniques especially position

    of the holes in the plunger bell, and the ladle. Many variations in design of equipment are

    possible but always the aim must be to maintain the alloy in the submerged position during the

    entire treatment operation disadvantage of the techniques compared with the use of the simple

    pour on methods are :

    The higher metal temperature loss the need to treat a minimum of about 1 tonne of metal if

    excessive temperature loss and low magnesium recoveries are to be avoided and the capital

    plunger or other components of the system and more complex metal handling requirements.

    The principal advantage is the ability to use the cheaper, higher magnesium content alloys

    which may be silicon and aluminium free, to give magnesium recoveries typically of 40-60%.

    G.F. CONVERTER PROCESS

    The Gerge Fisher process has been the most successful of the treatment methods using pure

    magnesium. The design of vessel is on the converter style and the metal is added when it is in

    the horizontal position. After charging the metal the magnesium the hole formed in the side of

    the ladle. This hole is than sealed and the converter is moved to the vertical position whenmetal flows into the reaction chamber by using the correct number and diameter of the holes in

    there factory partition plate the reaction is controlled and very high magnesium recoveries of

    the order of 50-60% are readily achieved. The advantages of the techniques are the high

    magnesium content the production irrespective of the base metal sulphur content and the use

    of a silicon aluminum free treatment materials. The disadvantages are the capital of the

    equipment and the need to treat a minimum of about 6 tons of the metal per hour.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    18/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    18

    TREATMENT IN THE MOULD :

    The technique of adding magnesium ferro-silicon in the mould cavity, now well known as the in

    mould process. In this process not suitable for longer and relatively higher volume production of

    ductile, the runner system for each casting contains a suitably designed chamber in which is

    placed a weighed amount of magnesium alloy but development work is required to ensure that

    consistency of structure can be assured on a production scale especially where multi-

    impression cavities are involved. The metal flowing at a known rate over the treatment alloy,

    produces a consistent pick-up of magnesium throughout the pouring period.

    No smoke or fume comes out from the mould during the reaction period whilst excellent

    magnesium recovery levels (usually >75%) are obtained. In addition there is no longer from

    fading and the nucleating effect of the treatment alloy aviated the need for additional

    inoculation.

    Further more since no handling at magnesium containing iron is involved, problem with build up of magnesium containing slags on ladle or furnace walls is eliminated.

    Nevertheless, the technique requires low base iron sulpher levels (

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    19/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    19

    Nodularing Alloy and Treatment Process

    Treatment Process

    1. Nickel Magnesium (5-15%Mg)

    2. Copper Magnesium (10-15%Mg)

    Pour on technique

    1. Nickel silicon magnesium (15% Mg)

    2. Copper silicon magnesium (12% Mg)

    Sandwich technique

    1. Magnesium Ferrosilicon (9%Mg)

    2. Magnesium Ferrosilicon (5%Mg)

    Sandwich and cover technique

    1. Magnesium Ferrosilicon (5% Mg or 9%

    Mg)

    Tundish Cover

    1. Magnesium Ferrosilicon (5% Mg ) In mould1. Magnesium Ferrosilicon (3-6+%Mg) Flow through technique

    1. Magnesium Silicon (20-35% Mg)

    2. Magnesium impregnated coke (42%Mg)

    3. Iron Magnesium briquettes (5-15% Mg)

    Plunging or submerged

    method technique

    Magnesium bar (>99% Mg)

    Magnesium powder (>99% Mg)

    Pressure vessel, converter,

    injection method

    3.9 INOCULATION OF DUCTILE IRONS

    PURPOSE:-The inoculation of cast iron involves the addition of small amounts of materials

    (inoculant) to molten metal either just before or during pouring. Inoculation increases number of

    points viable for the precipitation and subsequent growth of graphite. This effect of high level of

    nucleation is demonstrated. High level of nucleation promoted graphite structure whilst low

    levels can result in the formation of either mottled structure or white irons. The need for a high

    level of nucleation increases as cooling rate increases i.e. section size decreases.

    In addition to its effects on graphite morphology, magnesium is powerful carbide promoter;

    there is a tendency for ductile irons to solidify with white or mottled structures. The primary

    purpose of inoculating ductile irons, therefore is to suppress formation of chill and mottle. In

    addition, inoculation is important in maintaining good nodule shape and also high nodule

    numbers.

    INOCULANTS USED:-Graphite is not an effective inoculant for ductile iron and all effective

    inoculants are based on silicon. The most widely used is foundry grade ferrosilicon, contenting

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    20/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    2

    about 75% silicon. This alloy must contain small amount of aluminum and calcium, in order to

    be fully effective the amounts required are about 1.5 to 2.05% aluminum and about 0.3 to 1.0%

    calcium.

    ADDITION OF INOCULANTS: In general, much larger of inoculants are used for ductile iron

    than for grey irons with as much as 0.75% of silicon to be added as ferrosilicon. In practice, for

    ladle inoculation a 0.5% silicon addition should be adequate for most purposes.

    FADING: The effect of an inoculation addition is not permanent and starts to decreases (fade)

    immediately after the addition of Mg is made. As fading occur the number of nodules

    decreases, and the tendency to produce chill and mottle increases. In many cases half of the

    inoculating effect is lost within the first five minutes and nearly all after 10 minutes. As fading

    occurs graphite nodule shape deteriorates and quasi-flake or exploded nodules can be to occur

    Different technique of inoculation

    They are various technique of inoculation are

    1. Ladle inoculation The selected grade of inoculant for ladle inoculation should

    always be added to thermal stream when tapping from furnace to ladle, or ladle to

    ladle. Additions should begin when the ladle is one-quarter full and be completed when

    the ladle is three-quarters full, so that the last metal merely mixes.

    It is therefore difficult to give an accurate estimate of the amount of inoculant which is

    requiredfor every situation. In general inoculant addition of 0.3 to 1% by weight of

    metal will be satisfactorily for S.G. Iron. Care must be taken not to over inoculate of

    S.G. Iron there is problem arise with shrinkage porosity due to high nucleation level.

    2. MOULD INOCULATION:-The starting point was the placing of a small amount of fine

    ferrosilicon at the base of the sprue. However, results obtain tend to be erratic owing to

    the tendency for the inoculant s to be washed away by the initial stage of metal .as

    development progressed the used of a bonded pellet or pre-cast.

    Slug of inoculants was placed either in a chamber in the running system, or

    top of the strainer are which was positioned at the bottom of the sprue. In either case it

    was customary to provide a small mixing chamber before the metal entered the

    casting.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    21/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    21

    The weight of the inoculant s placed in the mould varied in accordance with

    weight of the casting and usually in the range 0.1 to 0.5% by weight of metal poured.

    This means that the running system and feeder system to be taken in to account. it is

    important that the inoculation is completely and uniformly distributed so that the effect

    is uniformly through out the casting. How these are achieved will depend on the design

    of the casting running and gating system. Mould inoculation can be used as the sole

    method of inoculation but because of problem in ensure complete and uniformly

    solution of the inoculation. It is more frequently used as a bake up to ladle inoculation.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    22/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    22

    METAL STREM INOCULATION:- Most other forms of inoculation are based on the addition of

    the powdered inoculant s to the metal stream just above the pouring basin or bush. The

    powdered inoculants (0.1 to 0.5 mm) are introduced via a tube to the metal stream. The

    dispenser can be activated by means of a photoelectric cell or alternatively by the control

    system fitted to an automatic pouring furnace. The delivery rate is set or the control box and

    does not change significantly. The principle requirement is that the inoculants used should be

    correctly sized and free from impurities which could give rise to slag inclusion.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    23/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    23

    4. HEAT TREATMENT OF DUCTILE IRON

    It is obviously desirable to achieve the required properties in the as-cast form, but this is not

    always possible because of variations of section thickness etc. Heat treatment of the castings willeliminate carbides in thin sections, produce more consistent matrix structures and for a given

    structure, the mechanical properties are often improved by heat treatment, especially by

    normalising. Where tempered martensite structures are needed, heat treatment is essential.

    Stress relief

    Heat at 50-100C/h to 600C (taking care not to exceed 610C), soak for one hour plus an hour for

    every 25 mm of section thickness in the thickest section. Cool at 50-100C/h to 200C or less.

    Ensure that the castings are adequately supported in the furnace so that they are not subjected

    to stress.

    Breakdown of carbides

    Thin section castings may contain carbides in the as-cast structure, these can be eliminated by

    soaking the castings at 900-925C for 3 to 5 hours.

    Annealing to produce a ferritic matrix

    Castings should be soaked at 900-925C for 3-5 hours, followed by slow cooling at around 20-

    35C/h through the critical temperature (about 800-710C), then furnace cooled at, say 50-

    100C/h to 200C

    Normalising to produce a pearlitic matrix

    Soak the castings above the critical temperature then air cool. Again a soaking temperature of 900-

    925C is usually used, to ensure that carbides are broken down, then use forced air cooling to form

    pearlite. The type of heat treatment "unace available and the size of the load determines the cycle

    that is possible. it may be necessary to adjust the metal composition with tin or copper to help

    the formation of fully pearlitic structures.

    Hardened and tempered structures

    Austenirise at 900-920C then oil quench. Tempering is usually carried out 600-650C.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    24/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    24

    Austempered ductile iron (ADI)

    Austempering is an isothermal heat treatment for producing 'bainitic' structures. It can double the

    strength of ductile iron while retaining good ductility and toughness. Wear resistance and fatigue

    properties are excellent so that ADI is comparable with wrought steel.

    The ADI heat treatment is a two-stage process, shown in the graph. Austenitising is carried out at

    815-930C to fully transform the matrix to austenite. This is done either in a non-oxidising

    atmosphere furnace or in a high temperature salt bath, temperatures and times are determined

    by chemical composition, section size and grade of ADI required. 1 to 1.5 hours is usually adequate.

    Slow initial heating of the casting is desirable to avoid the danger of cracking of complex shapes.

    The castings are then quenched to the required isothermal heat treatment temperature, usually

    between 210 and 400C This is usually done in a salt bath. The castings are held at temperature for

    1-2 hours to complete the transformation of austenite to bainite. The lower temperatures give high

    hardness, strength and wear resistance, while the higher heat treatment temperatures result in

    higher ductility and toughness. After the isothermal treatment, the castings are cooled to

    ambient temperature

    Typical austempering heat-treatment stages.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    25/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    2

    5. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES & MICROSTRUCTURE OF S.G. IRON

    5.1 MECHANICAL PROPERTIESBS-2789:1985 GRADES OF S.G IRON AND THEIR MECHANICAL PROPERTIES:

    ProperyGrade Produce to BS-2789:1985

    350/

    22

    400/

    18

    420/

    12

    450/

    10

    500/

    7

    600/

    3

    As-cast or

    normalized

    Quenched and

    tempered martensite

    700/2 800/2 900/2 700/2 800/2 900/2

    Tensile strength

    N/mm2350 400 420 450 500 600 700 800 900 700 800 900

    Elongation%

    (minimum and

    range)

    22

    to

    29

    18

    to

    27

    12

    to

    20

    10

    To

    18

    7

    To

    15

    3

    To

    7

    2

    To

    5

    2

    To

    5

    2

    To

    5

    2

    To

    5

    2

    To

    5

    2

    To

    5

    0.1% Poof strength(N/mm2)

    1.Tension 203 248 266 293 323 346 385 440 495 525 600 675

    2.Compression 226 271 289 316 340 360 397 452 507 537 612 687

    3.Torosion 157 192 206 227 241 247 270 308 347 368 420 473

    1.Typical impact

    properties un-notch

    fully ductile

    108

    To

    149

    108

    To

    149

    108

    To

    149

    95

    To

    140

    85

    To

    120

    40

    To

    75

    27

    To

    40

    25

    To

    35

    25

    To

    35

    108

    To

    149

    108

    To

    149

    108

    To

    149

    2. Notched fully

    dutile (J)

    18

    to21

    16

    to19

    16

    to19

    9

    to16

    7

    to16

    7

    to11

    6

    to8

    6

    to8

    6

    to8

    6

    to8

    6

    to8

    6

    to8

    Ductile to Brittle

    TransitionoC

    (Mean notch

    values)

    -50

    to

    -10

    -50

    to

    -10

    -50

    to

    -10

    0

    to

    20

    20

    to

    60

    40

    to

    80

    60

    to

    80

    60

    to

    80

    60

    to

    80

    0

    to

    40

    0

    to

    40

    0

    to

    40

    Hardness HB

    10/3000 Range

    107

    to

    130

    130

    to

    140

    140

    to

    155

    155

    to

    172

    172

    to

    216

    216

    to

    247

    247

    to

    265

    265

    to

    282

    282

    to

    299

    232

    to

    259

    259

    to

    286

    286

    to

    313

    Recommended design Stress

    Tensile (Static)

    N/mm2

    114 139 140 154 155 161 173 138 223 236 270 304

    Corpression (Static)

    N/mm2

    136 163 173 190 204 216 239 272 305 323 368 413

    Alternative fatigue

    Un notched 60 65 67 70 75 83 93 101 106 93 101 106

    Notched 38 40 41 43 45 50 56 61 63 56 61 63

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    26/32

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    27/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    2

    The metal composition of this casting:-Composition Percentage

    C 3.6

    Si 2.67

    Mn 0.19

    S 0.01

    P 0.031

    Cr 0.03

    Ni 0.39

    Cu 0.007

    Mg 0.067

    COMPOSITIONS some SG Iron casting (Produced by L&T)

    SL.NO. C Si Mn S P Cr Ni Mo Cu Mg

    1 3.63 2.15 0.17 0.008 .029 0.03 0.36 0.002 0.02 0.043

    2 3.68 2.55 0.15 0.01 0.03 0.039 0.33 0.005 0.028 0.038

    3 3.55 2.19 0.18 0.01 0.026 0.02 0.36 0.001 0.011 0.045

    4 3.58 2.05 0.2 0.011 0.036 0.02 0.42 0.002 0.002 0.037

    5 3.54 1.8 0.2 0.01 0.031 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.009 0.04

    Mechanical Properties of the ITEMS:-

    SL.NO Testcondition

    0.2%proofstress (Mpa)

    U.T.S.(Mpa)

    % Ofelongation

    Impact (J)At 20oC

    1 Not heat treated * 420.77 20.57 8 8 8

    2 Not heat treated 270.56 382.00 23.14 16 17 17

    3 Not heat treated 238.97 382.00 22.28 17 16 17

    4 Not heat treated 302.07 481.08 17.28 6 6 5

    5 Not heat treated 270.56 391.47 23.14 17 15 15

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    28/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    28

    5.2 MICROSTRUCTURE OF SG IRON

    Microstructure of nodular iron with 4.13% silicon content Microstructure of nodular iron with 0.50% phosphorus content

    Microstructure of nodular iron with 2.92% Mn content Nodular iron prepared from Swedish charcoal ironwith no special addition other than magnesium and

    inoculant

    Small amount of flake form of graphite due to 0.009%lead.

    0.13% cerium. Graphite nodules in a matrix of pearlite.

    Flake from of graphite in iron No. 4 with 0.013% lead 0.003% basimuth.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    29/32

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    30/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    3

    6. APPLICATION OF S.G IRON

    The application of the S.G iron have increased tremendously in recent times as can be seen

    from the list of the components which are being made.

    Engine crank shaft Brake caliper, disc brake anchor, brake anchor plate. Machine- tool bed Electrical insulator post and cap. Steering Knuckle Rack and pinion of steering assembly Piston for impact drills. Rolling mill rolls. Moulding boxes and mould box clamps Brake shoe for heavy duty brakes. Glass moulds. Spacer cage for rolling bearing. Piston rings.

    Wind mill items.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    31/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.

    National Institute of Foundry & Forge Technology

    31

    7. CONCLUSIONS

    The ductile iron finds wide engineering application because of its excellent combination of

    castability and mechanical property. It has also very good machaniability, corrosion resistance,

    wear resistance and thermal shock resistance. It finds application in gears, dies, valve and

    pump bodies, pinion, crank shaft etc. It is a widely acceptable cast iron because of high

    strength and good ductility. The problems faced due to lower melting and boiling point of Mg

    have been encounter by using various magnesium treatment practices.

  • 8/11/2019 Seminar s.g Iron

    32/32

    Seminar Report on Production of S.G. Iron Page No.32

    REFERENCES

    1. Source book onDuctile Iron, ASM Publication, June 1977.

    2.

    AFS Production of S.G. Iron Practice, 1976.3. Fosico-ferrous Foundrymen, Handbook by R. Brown, 2000.

    4. Principles of Metal Casting by Philip C. Rosenthal, 2003

    5. ASM Hand Book, vol.15 (Casting), Ninth Edition, September, 1988.

    6. Ductile Iron Production practice by BRCA, 1995.

    7. Foundry Technology Paul J. Mikelonis ASM and AFS, 1985.

    8. Typical Microstructures of cast metal, by G. Lambert, 1966