7
Irnat. J. M. Math. Si. Vol. 4 No. (1981)445-450 445 SEMI SEPARATION AXIOMS AND HYPERSPACES CHARLES DORSETT Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University College Station, Texas (Received April 21, 1980 and in revised form September 4, 1980) ABSTRACT. In this paper examples are given to show that s-regular and s-normal are independent; that s-normal, and s-regular are not semi topological properties; and that (S(X),E(X)) need not be semi-T I even if (X,T) is compact, s-normal, s-regular, semi-T2, and T 0. Also, it is shown that for each space (X,T), (S(X) ,E(X)), (S(X O) ,E(Xo)), and (S(Xs0) ,E(Xs0)) are homeomorphic, where (X0, Q(X0)) is the T0-identification space of (X,T) and (Xs0,Q(Xs0)) is the semi-T0-identification space of (X,T), and that if (X,T) is s-regular and , then (S(X), E(X)) is semi-T 2. KEF WORDS AND PHRASES. Smi open sets, smi topological propZies, and 1980 MATHEMATICS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES. 54AI0, 54B20. i. INTRODUCTION. Semi open sets’were first defined and investigated by Levine [i] in 1963. DEFINITION I.i. Let (X,T) be a space and let A -X. Then A is semi open, denoted by A E SO(X,T),I there exists U E T such that U GA GU. Since 1963 semi open sets have been used to define and investigate many new topological properties. Maheshwari and Prasad [2], [3], and [4] generalized T i, i 0, i, 2, regular, and normal to semi-T i, i 0, 1,2, s-regular, and s-normal,

SEMISEPARATION AXIOMS HYPERSPACES

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    15

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SEMISEPARATION AXIOMS HYPERSPACES

Irnat. J. M. Math. Si.Vol. 4 No. (1981)445-450

445

SEMI SEPARATION AXIOMS AND HYPERSPACES

CHARLES DORSETTDepartment of Mathematics, Texas A&M University

College Station, Texas

(Received April 21, 1980 and in revised form September 4, 1980)

ABSTRACT. In this paper examples are given to show that s-regular and s-normal

are independent; that s-normal, and s-regular are not semi topological properties;

and that (S(X),E(X)) need not be semi-TI even if (X,T) is compact, s-normal,

s-regular, semi-T2, and T0. Also, it is shown that for each space (X,T),

(S(X) ,E(X)), (S(XO) ,E(Xo)), and (S(Xs0) ,E(Xs0)) are homeomorphic, where

(X0, Q(X0)) is the T0-identification space of (X,T) and (Xs0,Q(Xs0)) is the

semi-T0-identification space of (X,T), and that if (X,T) is s-regular and ,then (S(X), E(X)) is semi-T2.

KEF WORDS AND PHRASES. Smi open sets, smi topological propZies, and

1980 MATHEMATICS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION CODES. 54AI0, 54B20.

i. INTRODUCTION.

Semi open sets’were first defined and investigated by Levine [i] in 1963.

DEFINITION I.i. Let (X,T) be a space and let A -X. Then A is semi open,

denoted by A E SO(X,T),I there exists U E T such that U GA GU.

Since 1963 semi open sets have been used to define and investigate many new

topological properties. Maheshwari and Prasad [2], [3], and [4] generalized Ti,

i 0, i, 2, regular, and normal to semi-Ti, i 0, 1,2, s-regular, and s-normal,

Page 2: SEMISEPARATION AXIOMS HYPERSPACES

446 C. DORSETT

by replacing the word open in the definitions of Ti, i 0, i, 2, regular, and

normal by semi open, respectively. Except for s-normal and s-regular, the

relationships between these separation axioms have been determined. In this

paper, the relationship between s-normal and s-regular is determined, and semi

topological properties and hyperspaces are further investigated.

2. s-REGULAR -NORMAL AND SEMI TOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES.

Maheshwarl and Prasad [4] gave an example showing that s-normal does not

imply s-regular. That example can be combined with the following example to

show that s-regular and s-normal are independent.

EXAMPLE 2.1 Let N denote the natural numbers, let T be the discrete topology

on N, let e be the embedding map of (N,T) into {If f 6 C*(N,T)}, and let

(8N, W) (e(N), e) denote the Stone-ech compactification of (N,T). From

Willard’s book [5], (8N, W) is extremely disconnected, e(N) is open in 8N, and

B BN- e(N) is infinite. For each p N let N {n N n < p}. Since forp

each p N, there exists a function f N / B x W such that (i) if % {2,...,p},P P

then fi is an extension of fi-l’ (2) xi

0i

for all i Np, (3) if i, j Np,then 0--

in’ 0--j # iff i ], and (4) B-

i0i

is infinite, then there

exists a sequence {(Xn,0 )}n BW such that x 0 for all n N andn ; n n

[ # iff m n. Let {a } he a sequence such that {a n N}C, SNm n n n6 n

and an --am iff n m, let V {Xn In N} U nN{Un 0n e(N)}3 43N, let

W1be the relative topology on V, and let X V D{an n N}. Since UI is

countably infinite, then U1 {Yn}n N,where Yi YJ iff i j. For each

i N, let Bi

{0 c X- n’{{x-I n N} b{an] n # i}) 0 IUn W1 for all

n N, Xn 0 Un except for finitely many n 6N, and ai, Yl 0}, and let

W2 =IN Bi" Then WI

b W2 is a base for a topology S on X, (X,S) is

s-regular, semi-T2, and TO, and (X S) is not s-normal since A {a n N}n

and C {x n N } are disjoint closed sets and there do not exist disjointn

semi open sets containing A and C, respectively.

Semihomeomorphisms and semi topological properties were first introduced

and investigated by Crossley and Hildebrand [6].

Page 3: SEMISEPARATION AXIOMS HYPERSPACES

SEMI SEPARATION AXIOMS AND HYPERSPACES 447

DEFINITION 2.1. A i-i function from one space onto another space is a

semihomeomorphism iff images of semi open sets are semi open and inverses of

semi open sets are semi open. A property of topological spaces preserved by

semihomeomorphisms is called a semi topological property.

Example 1.5 in [6], which was used to show that normal and regular are not

semi topological properties, also shows that s-normal and s-regular are not

semi topological properties.

Clearly, semi-Ti, i 0, i, 2, are semi topological properties.

3. HYPERSPACES AND SEMI SEPARATION AXIOMS

DEFINITION 3.1. Let (X,T) be a topological space, let A cX, and define

S(X), S(A), and I(A) as follows: S(X) {F cX F is nonempty and closed},

S(A) {F S(X) F CA}, and I(A) {F S(X) F A }. Denote by E(X)

the smallest topology on S(X) satisfying the conditions that if G 6 T, then

S(G) 6 E(X) and I(G) E(X). Then (S(X), E(X)) is called a hyperspace [7].

Michael [8] showed that for a space (X,T), B {<GI Gp> p N and

Gi T for all i Np {l,J..,p}} is a base for E(X), where N is theP

natural numbers and <GI G > <Gi>PiffiI {F S(X) F c i- Gi andp

F Gi # for all i Np}, and observed that for each space (X,T),

(S(), E(X)) is TO Since TO implies semi-T0, then for each space (X,T),

(S(X), E(X)) is semi-T0. The following example shows that (S(X),E(X)) need not

be semi-T1 even if (X,T) is compact, s-normal, s-regualr, semi-T2, and T0.

EXAMPLE 3.1 Let X {a,b,c,d} and T {X,,{b},{d},{b,d},{a,b,d},{b,c,d}}.

Then (S(X), E(X)) is not semi-T1 since {a,b,c}, X S(X) such that {a,b,c} # X

and there does not exist a semi open set containing {a,b,c} and not X.

In Willard’s book [5], T0-identification spaces are discussed.

DEFINITION 3.2 Let R be the equivalence relation on a space (X,T)

defined by xRy iff {x-- {-. Then the T0-1dentification space of (X,T) is

(X0, Q(X0)), where X0 is the set of equivalence classes of R and Q() is the

decomposition topology on X0, which is T0.

Page 4: SEMISEPARATION AXIOMS HYPERSPACES

448 C. DORSETT

This author [9] used T0-identification spaces to show that hyperspaces of

spaces, spaces which were first defined and investigated by Davis [i0], are TI.

DEFINITION 3.3.. A space (X,T) is R0 iff for each 0 E T and x E 0,

{x) c 0.

Since T1 implies semi-Tl, then the hyperspace of each space is semi-TI.

Semi open sets were used by Crossley and Hildebran [ii] to define and

investigate semi closed sets and semi closure.

DEFINITION 3.4. Let (X,T) be a space and let A, B c X. Then A is semi

closed iff X-A is semi open and the semi closure of B, denoted by scl B, is the

intersection of all semi closed sets containing B.

This author [12] used semi closure to define and investigate semi-T0

identification spaces.

DEFINITION 3.5. Let R be the equlvalence relatlon on a space (X,T) defined

by xRy iff scl{x} scl{y}. Then the semi-T0-identification space of (X,T) is

(Xs0 Q(Xs0), where XS0 is the set of equivalence classes of R and Q(Xs0) is the

decomposition topology on XS0 which is senti-T0,

This author [13] and [12] showed that the natural map P: (X,T) / (X0,Q(Xo))-1

is continuous, closed, open, onto, and P (P(0)) 0 for all 0 T and that the

natural map PS: (X,T) / (Xso, Q(Xs0)) is continuous, closed, open, onto, and

PI(Ps(0)) 0 for all 0 S0(X,T). These results are used to obtain the

following result.

THEOREM 3.1. For a space (X,T),(S(X),E(X)), (S(X0),E(X0)), and

(S (Xs0), E (Xs0)) are homeomorphic.

PROOF: Let f: (S(X),E(X)). / (S(Xo),E(X0)) and let fs: (S(X),E(X)) /

(S(Xs0),E(Xs0)) defined by f(F) P(F) and fs(F) PS(F). Then f and fs are

homeomorphlsms.

THEOREM 3.2. If (X,T) is R0,G q T, and F S(X) such that F i # @, then

S(G) S(G) and F E l(G).

PROOF: Since S(G) c S(G), which is closed, then S(G) c S(G). Let

p PA S(G). Let <Bi>i=1 B such that A <Bi>i=1. Then A c G and

Page 5: SEMISEPARATION AXIOMS HYPERSPACES

SEMI SEPARATION AXIOMS AND HYPERSPACES 449

# A Bic G Bifor all i Np, which implies G iBi # @ for all i Np.

For each 16 N let xi

G .Bi. Then _{xi} cG .RBi for all iE N andP P

e--N {xi } E S(G)I <Bi>i=l. Thus AE ’(G) and S(G) c S(G), which impliesi

PS(G) S(G).

mLet <Ui>i=1 E 8 such that F <Ui>=I. Then Fc i UIE T andm

m Henceeach i 6 Nm let Yi Bi" en } U i } I(G) C, <Ui>i.1.m

THEOREM 3.3. If (X,T) is s-regular and , then (S(X),E(X)) is semi-T2.

PROOF: Let A, BE S(X) such that A # B. Then A- B # or B A # @,

say B- A # . Let x E B- A. Then there exists disjoint semi open sets 0 and

W such that x E 0 and A cW. Let U, V ET such that Uc 0 cU and V cW cV.

Then I(U) and S(V) are disjoint open sets, B E I(U), and A E S(V) S(V), which

implies S(V) b {A} and I(U) U {B} are disjoint semi open sets.

Maheshwari and Prasad [4] showed that every s-normal space is s-regular.

This result can be combined with Theorem 3.3 to obtain the following corollary.

COROLLARY 3.1. If (X,T) is s-normal and R0, then (S(X),E(X)) is semi-T2.

Page 6: SEMISEPARATION AXIOMS HYPERSPACES

50 C. DORSETT

REFERENCES

i. LEVINE, N., Semi Open Sets and Semi Continuity in Topological Spaces,Amer. Math. Monthly, 7_0 (1963), 36-41.

2. MAHESHWARI, S. and PRASAD, R., Some New Separation Axioms, Ann. Soc. Sci.Bruxelles, 89 (1975), 395-402.

3. MAHESHWARI, S. and PRASAD, R., On s-Regular Spaces, Glasnik Mat. Ser. III,i0 (30) (1975), 347-350.

4. MAHESHWARI, S. and PRASAD, R., On s-Normal Spaces, Bull. Math. de la Soc.Sci. Math. de la R. S. de Roumanie, T 22(70) (1978), 27-30.

5. WILLARD, S., General Topology, Addlson-Wesley Publishing Company, 1970.

6. CROSSLEY, S. and HILDEBRAND, S., Semi-Topological Properties, Fund. Math.,74 (1972), 233-254.

7. FRINK, 0., Topology in Lattices, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 5_i (1942), 569-582.

8. MICHAEL, E., Topologies on Spaces of Subsets, Trans Amer. Math. Soc., 7__1(1951) 152-182.

9. DORSETT, C., T^-Identification Spaces and Hyperspaces, Ann. Soc. Sci.

Bruxelles? 9__1 (1977), 200-206.

i0. DAVIS, A., Indexed Systems of Neighborhoods for General Topological Spaces,Amer. Math. Monthly, 68 (1961), 886-893.

ii. CROSSLEY, S. and HILDEBRAND, S., Semi-closure, Texas J. Science, 22 (1970),99-112.

12. DORSETT, C., Semi-T^-Identification Spaces, Semi-Induced Relations, andSemi Separation Axioms, Accepted by the Bull Calcutta Math. Soc.

13. DORSETT C., To-Identification Spaces and R1 Spaces, Kyungpook Math. J.,18i2) (1978), 167-174.

Page 7: SEMISEPARATION AXIOMS HYPERSPACES

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MathematicsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com

Differential EquationsInternational Journal of

Volume 2014

Applied MathematicsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Probability and StatisticsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Mathematical PhysicsAdvances in

Complex AnalysisJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

OptimizationJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

CombinatoricsHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

International Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Operations ResearchAdvances in

Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Function Spaces

Abstract and Applied AnalysisHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Algebra

Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Decision SciencesAdvances in

Discrete MathematicsJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com

Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Stochastic AnalysisInternational Journal of