841
Service request under the framework contract No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 FINAL REPORT “Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs” 25 March 2011 (Update 13 April 2011) Consortium ESWI Expert Team to Support Waste Implementation

Service request under the framework contract No ENV.G.4 ...ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/pdf/POP_Waste_2011.pdf · 9 Low POP concentration limit and maximum POP concentration

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Service request under the framework contract

    No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066

    FINAL REPORT

    Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    25 March 2011

    (Update 13 April 2011)

    Consortium ESWI

    Expert Team to Support Waste Implementation

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 ii

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Content

    1 Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 31

    2 Background and objectives..................................................................................................... 39

    3 Sources of Information ........................................................................................................... 44

    3.1 Structure of required information .................................................................................................... 44

    3.2 Questionnaire survey ........................................................................................................................ 44

    3.3 European Commission ...................................................................................................................... 47

    3.4 Expert meeting with Member States ................................................................................................ 47

    3.5 Stakeholder consultation on the interim results .............................................................................. 47

    3.6 Statistics, data bases and literature .................................................................................................. 48

    4 Legal Situation ....................................................................................................................... 50

    4.1 Legal Background at international and at EU level ........................................................................... 50

    4.2 Additional regulation at Member States level .................................................................................. 59

    5 Overview of mass flows of new POPs and candidate POPs ...................................................... 60

    5.1 Objectives and methodology ............................................................................................................ 60

    5.2 Sources of new POPs and candidate POPs entering articles, waste and the environment .............. 63

    5.3 Investigated sectors .......................................................................................................................... 68

    5.4 Overview of the substance flows ...................................................................................................... 71

    5.5 Evaluation of the data quality and uncertainties ............................................................................ 119

    6 Detailed mass flow analyses ................................................................................................. 122

    6.1 C-PentaBDE flows ............................................................................................................................ 122

    6.2 C-OctaBDE flows .............................................................................................................................. 161

    6.3 PFOS flows ....................................................................................................................................... 187

    6.4 PeCB flows ....................................................................................................................................... 251

    6.5 SCCP flows ....................................................................................................................................... 302

    6.6 HBCD flows ...................................................................................................................................... 356

    6.7 PCP flows ......................................................................................................................................... 418

    6.8 HCBD flows ...................................................................................................................................... 442

    6.9 PCN flows ........................................................................................................................................ 474

    6.10 Remediation methods for contaminated sites ............................................................................... 532

    7 Measurement methods ........................................................................................................ 534

    7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 534

    7.2 Problem of matrix inhomogeneity for measurement of POPs in waste matrices .......................... 535

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 iii

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    7.3 Basic principles of standard development ...................................................................................... 537

    7.4 International Overview of Measurement Methods for new POPs and candidate POPs ................ 538

    7.5 References ....................................................................................................................................... 580

    8 Scenarios and Prognosis on future Development .................................................................. 593

    8.1 Function of Limit Values under the EU POP Regulation ................................................................. 593

    8.2 General Implications of Limit Values .............................................................................................. 594

    8.3 Waste and Mass Flow Scenarios in Relation to Limit Values .......................................................... 595

    8.4 Prognosis on future development .................................................................................................. 623

    9 Low POP concentration limit and maximum POP concentration limit for POP waste .............. 634

    9.1 Methodology to assess and suggest low POP concentration limit and maximum POP concentration limits ........................................................................................................................ 634

    9.2 Proposals for low POP concentration limits .................................................................................... 650

    9.3 Proposals for maximum POP content levels ................................................................................... 729

    9.4 Impacts and Implications on Product and Waste Legislation ......................................................... 740

    9.5 Impacts of proposed limit values on current recycling activities.................................................... 744

    9.6 Possible implications of concentration limits for PBDEs in new articles produced from recycled materials above which the articles cannot be placed on the market ............................................. 756

    9.7 Disposal and recovery operations for new and candidate POPs .................................................... 759

    9.8 References ....................................................................................................................................... 769

    10 Conclusions and recommendations ...................................................................................... 773

    10.1 Low and Maximum POP Concentration Limits ............................................................................... 773

    10.2 Relevance of Low and Maximum POP content levels for waste flows ........................................... 774

    10.3 Proposed LPCLs and related impacts .............................................................................................. 776

    10.4 Proposed measures and related impacts ........................................................................................ 796

    10.5 Impacts of proposed limit values on current recycling activities.................................................... 798

    10.6 Possible impacts on product and waste regulation ........................................................................ 800

    10.7 Possible implications of concentration limits for PBDEs in new articles produced from recycled materials above which the articles cannot be placed on the market ............................................. 802

    10.8 Measurement Methods .................................................................................................................. 803

    11 General References .............................................................................................................. 804

    12 Annex .................................................................................................................................. 806

    12.1 Annex 1: Questionnaire .................................................................................................................. 807

    12.2 Annex 2: Evaluation Questionnaire ................................................................................................. 819

    12.3 Annex 3: Evaluation Questionnaire for submission of information on New POPs in accordance with SC-4/19 .................................................................................................................................... 828

    12.4 Annex IV: Physico-chemical properties of POPs ............................................................................. 835

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 iv

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    12.5 Annex V: Number and capacity of treatment facilities in 2004 and 2006 at country level ............ 838

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 v

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    List of Tables

    Table 1-1: Overview of preferred proposals (LPCL 1) and alternative transitional or restricted

    proposals (LPCL 2) for Low POP Concentration Limits (LPCLs) referred to in Article

    7(4)(a) and to be specified in Annex IV of the POP Regulation. ....................................... 35

    Table 1-2: Overview of preferred proposals (MPCL 1) and alternative transitional proposals

    (MPCL 2) for Maximum POP Concentration Limits (MPCLs) to be specified in

    Annex V, Para 2 of the POP Regulation ............................................................................ 35

    Table 2-1: List of new and candidate POPs ........................................................................................ 41

    Table 3-1: Overview of contacted stakeholders ................................................................................ 46

    Table 4-1: Overview of relevant legal documents addressing the selected substances ................... 58

    Table 5-1: Relative importance of waste treatment options for MSW and similar waste

    (based on [E-STAT 2010] data for the year 2008) ............................................................. 62

    Table 5-2: Overview of sectors and their relevance in the scope of the present study .................... 69

    Table 5-3: Overview of the contribution to the waste flow of the relevant congener groups to

    the amount of C-PentaBDE in automotive and upholstery applications .......................... 72

    Table 5-4: Emissions and discharge of C-PentaBDE from investigated sources in the EU ................ 73

    Table 5-5: Quantitative contribution of C-PentaBDE from different sectors to currently used

    disposal/recovery operations in the EU............................................................................ 74

    Table 5-6: Annual amounts of C-PentaBDE containing residues and the ranges of

    contamination with C-PentaBDE and corresponding C-PentaBDE amount in

    investigated sectors in the EU; * ea = estimated average ................................................ 76

    Table 5-7: Overview of the contribution of the relevant congener groups to the amount C-

    OctaBDE for the EEE sector ............................................................................................... 78

    Table 5-8: Emissions and discharge of C-OctaBDE from the investigated source in the EU ............. 78

    Table 5-9: Quantitative contribution of C-OctaBDE to currently used disposal/recovery

    operations in the EU ......................................................................................................... 78

    Table 5-10: Annual amounts of C-OctaBDE containing residues and the ranges of

    contamination with C-OctaBDE and corresponding C-OctaBDE amount in the EU;

    *ea = estimated average ................................................................................................... 79

    Table 5-11: Contribution of the relevant sectors in the EU 27 to PFOS in emissions, products

    and waste .......................................................................................................................... 81

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 vi

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 5-12: Quantitative contribution of PFOS from the different sectors to currently used

    disposal/recovery operations in EU 27 ............................................................................. 83

    Table 5-13: Annual amounts of PFOS containing residues (wastes) and PFOS contamination

    ranges................................................................................................................................ 85

    Table 5-14: Contribution of the relevant sectors in the EU 27 to PeCB in emissions, products

    and waste .......................................................................................................................... 89

    Table 5-15: Quantitative contribution of PeCB from the different sectors to currently used

    disposal/recovery operations in EU 27 ............................................................................. 91

    Table 5-16: Annual amounts of PeCB containing residues (wastes) and PeCB contamination

    ranges................................................................................................................................ 93

    Table 5-17: Quantitative contribution of SCCP from different sectors to currently used

    disposal/recovery operations in the EU 27 ....................................................................... 97

    Table 5-18: Annual amounts of SCCP containing residues (waste and products) and the ranges

    of contamination with SCCP and corresponding SCCP amount in investigated

    sectors in the EU ............................................................................................................... 99

    Table 5-19: Emissions and discharge of HBCD from investigated sources in the EU (2010) ............. 101

    Table 5-20: Distribution of HBCD emissions to air, waste water and surface water ......................... 101

    Table 5-21: Quantitative contribution of HBCD from different sectors to currently used

    disposal/recovery operations in the EU (2010) .............................................................. 103

    Table 5-22: Annual amounts of HBCD containing residues (waste and products) and the

    ranges of contamination with HBCD and corresponding HBCD amount in

    investigated sectors in the EU; *ea = estimated average (used for calculations) ........ 104

    Table 5-23: Contribution of the relevant sectors in the EU 27 to PFOS in emissions, products

    and waste ........................................................................................................................ 107

    Table 5-24: Quantitative contribution of PCP from the different sectors to currently used

    disposal/recovery operations in EU 27. .......................................................................... 108

    Table 5-25: Annual amounts of PCP containing residues (wastes) and PFOS contamination

    ranges.............................................................................................................................. 110

    Table 5-26: Contribution of the relevant sectors in the EU 27 to PCN in emissions, products

    and waste ........................................................................................................................ 114

    Table 5-27: Quantitative contribution of PCNs from the different sectors to currently used

    disposal/recovery operations in EU 27 ........................................................................... 116

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 vii

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 5-28: Annual amounts of PCN containing residues (wastes) and PCN contamination

    ranges.............................................................................................................................. 118

    Table 5-29: Indicative assessment of the data quality for new and candidate POPs for relevant

    applications ..................................................................................................................... 120

    Table 6-1: Composition of C-PentaBDE [Canada 2006; SFT 2009] .................................................. 123

    Table 6-2: Levels of PentaBDE (BDE-99) in sediment and soil (DW: dry weight) [Penta_UNEP

    2006] ............................................................................................................................... 123

    Table 6-3: Hot spot levels of BDEs (total BDEs including BDE-47, BDE-99 and BDE-100) in soil

    and sediment collected near a polyurethane foam manufacturing facility, levels

    cited by [Watson et al. 2010] .......................................................................................... 123

    Table 6-4: C-PentaBDE overview of use and imports for the EU ..................................................... 130

    Table 6-5: C-PentaBDE concentrations in PUR foams ..................................................................... 134

    Table 6-6: Share of exported new cars and ELVs [EUROSTAT 2010] ............................................... 141

    Table 6-7: Estimated amount of C-PentaBDE in automotive applications in the EU ...................... 141

    Table 6-8: Estimated accumulated consumption of C-PentaBDE in upholstery products .............. 151

    Table 6-9: Composition of C-OctaBDE [Octa_UNEP 2008] .............................................................. 162

    Table 6-10: Levels of C-OctaBDE* and its congeners in sediment and soil (DW: dry weight)

    [Octa_UNEP 2007] .......................................................................................................... 162

    Table 6-11: Levels of C-OctaBDE* and its congeners in sludges and coastal sediments receiving

    industrial and municipal effluents (DW: dry weight) [Octa_UNEP 2007] ....................... 163

    Table 6-12: Concentrations of OctaBDE in WEEE [Swiss 2003; CreaSolv 2004] ................................ 174

    Table 6-13: Summary of Waste Management Options [SC-4/19: BG, DE, SE, AT and LT 2010] ........ 179

    Table 6-14: Levels of PFOS in sediment and soil (DW: dry weight; ww: wet weight; ND: not

    detected) [UNEP 2006b]; [HelsinkiComission_2009] ..................................................... 189

    Table 6-15: Levels of PFOS in sewage sludge including hot spot levels (DW: dry weight);

    [NRW_2009]; [BLU_2010]; [Weber et al. 2010]; [OECD_2002] ...................................... 189

    Table 6-16: PFOS amounts currently used in the relevant industry sectors ..................................... 196

    Table 6-17: Production amounts of relevant products containing PFOS in 2000 [UBA_2001] ......... 208

    Table 6-18: Overview of PFOS quantities contained in products from the photographic

    industry ........................................................................................................................... 210

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 viii

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 6-19: PFOS used in the different sections of the photographic industry between 2000

    and 2010. ........................................................................................................................ 211

    Table 6-20: Estimated quantities of PFOS containing fire fighting foams stored in EU and

    estimated use quantities from 2004 to 2012 ................................................................. 224

    Table 6-21: Corrected estimated quantities of PFOS containing fire fighting foams stored in EU

    and estimated use quantities from 2004 to 2012 .......................................................... 225

    Table 6-22: Overview of fire fighting foam quantities, related PFOS concentrations and

    resulting PFOS amount in some Member States [CARACAL_2008] ............................... 226

    Table 6-23: Sales volume of one fire fighting foam producer in the Netherlands [RIVM_2009] ...... 226

    Table 6-24: Estimated sales volume between 1991 and 2006 using mean values. .......................... 227

    Table 6-25: Comparison of worst case scenario mean value and best case. .................................... 227

    Table 6-26: Information on fire fighting foam quantities, related PFOS concentrations and

    resulting PFOS amounts for some Member States according to the UNEP

    questionnaire .................................................................................................................. 228

    Table 6-27: Annual European leather production from 1997 to 2002 [Euroleather_2010] ............. 233

    Table 6-28: Reduction of PFOS contained in upholstery in households ............................................ 234

    Table 6-29: Overview of tuft carpets ................................................................................................. 239

    Table 6-30: measured PFOS concentration of sewage sludges exceeding 100 g/kg

    [NRW_2007c] .................................................................................................................. 243

    Table 6-31: Annual sewage sludge production in Europe [EUROSTAT 2010] .................................... 244

    Table 6-32: Levels of PeCB in sediment and soil including hot spots (DW: dry weight)

    ([UNEP/POP/POPRC.3/20/Add.7]; [UNEP/POP/POPRC.3/INF/21]) ................................ 253

    Table 6-33: Overview of quintozene production and use in the EU before its ban in 2002 ............. 259

    Table 6-34: Overview of estimated annual global and Canadian emissions of PeCB [Bailey et al.

    2009; Environment Canada 2005] .................................................................................. 261

    Table 6-35: Quantities of MSW generated in EU 27 and amounts of MSW incinerated in EU 27

    in 2008 ............................................................................................................................ 271

    Table 6-36: PeCB mass flow for MSWI in EU 27 ................................................................................ 273

    Table 6-37: Amount of hazardous waste incinerated in EU 27 in 2006 ............................................ 277

    Table 6-38: PeCB mass flow from hazardous waste incineration (HWI) in EU 27 in 2006 ................ 278

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 ix

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 6-39: Annual consumption of solid fuels for power production in the EU in 2008 ................. 283

    Table 6-40: Treatment of solid residues from power production in EU 15 in 1999 [BREF LPC

    2004] ............................................................................................................................... 284

    Table 6-41: PeCB mass flow from power production via coal, lignite and derivates in EU 27 in

    2008 ................................................................................................................................ 284

    Table 6-42: Annual amount of sewage sludge in the EU 27 .............................................................. 288

    Table 6-43: Treatment of urban sewage sludge in Member States (PT, DK: no data; MT: no

    production) ..................................................................................................................... 289

    Table 6-44: PeCB mass flow for sewage sludge in EU 27 ................................................................... 289

    Table 6-45: Annual consumption of solid fuels, wood and mixed solid fuels for domestic

    burning in EU 27 in 2008 ................................................................................................. 293

    Table 6-46: PeCB mass flow for domestic burning of wood and solid fuels in EU 27 ....................... 294

    Table 6-47: Levels of SCCP in sediment and soil (DW: dry weight; ww: wet weight; ND: not

    detected) [SCCP OSPAR 2001], [SCCP POPRC 6/11] ....................................................... 304

    Table 6-48: Levels of SCCP in sewage sludge including hot spot levels (DW: dry weight) [SCCP

    OSPAR 2001] [SCCP POPRC 6/11], [SCCP UBA 2006], [SCCP BUWAL 2003] ................... 305

    Table 6-49: Implementation of PARCOM Decision 95/1 (t/y) [SCCP OSPAR 2006] ........................... 307

    Table 6-50: Estimated tonnage of SCCPs used in the EU (t/y) ([SCCP ECHA 2008]; [SCCP RPA

    2010]) .............................................................................................................................. 312

    Table 6-51: Overview of the extrapolated SCCP consumption for EU 27 in the rubber industry

    in the last decades. ......................................................................................................... 312

    Table 6-52: Estimated tonnage of SCCP used for the production of conveyor belts in the EU

    (t/y) ................................................................................................................................. 316

    Table 6-53: Estimated tonnage of SCCP used in the EU (t/y) [SCCP ECHA 2008] .............................. 320

    Table 6-54: Overview of SCCP and waste amounts in the EU 27 within the last 17 years ................ 321

    Table 6-55: End-use market share of sealants and adhesive in the EU 27 in 2009 [SCCP RPA

    2010] ............................................................................................................................... 323

    Table 6-56: Estimated tonnage of SCCP used in the EU (t/y) [SCCP ECHA 2008] .............................. 326

    Table 6-57: Overview of SCCP and waste amounts in the EU 27 within the last 17 years ................ 327

    Table 6-58: Overview of the content of SCCPs in SCCP containing paints (t/y) [SCCP ECHA

    2008] ............................................................................................................................... 329

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 x

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 6-59: Annually used amount of SCCP containing paint in the EU 27 ....................................... 332

    Table 6-60: Estimated tonnage of SCCP used in the EU (t/y) for textiles ([SCCP ECHA 2008],

    [SCCP RPA 2010]) ............................................................................................................ 334

    Table 6-61: Overview of SCCP consumption and losses during production and life time within

    the last 17 years. ............................................................................................................. 337

    Table 6-62: Levels of SCCP in sewage sludge including hot spot levels (DW: dry weight) ................ 340

    Table 6-63: Annual sewage sludge production in EU 27 [EUROSTAT 2010] ...................................... 342

    Table 6-64: Estimated tonnage of SCCP used in the EU (t/y) [SCCP ECHA 2008] .............................. 345

    Table 6-65: Overview of the use of SCCP in the leather industry since 1994 .................................... 347

    Table 6-66: Possible quantities of SCCPs as impurities in MCCPs in different industry sectors if

    former SCCP uses have been replaced by the use of MCCPs containing 1% SCCPs ....... 351

    Table 6-67: Possible contributions to the use of SCCPs by impurities in MCCPs in different

    industry sectors if former SCCP uses have been replaced by the use of MCCPs

    containing 1% SCCPs ....................................................................................................... 352

    Table 6-68: HBCD concentrations measured in the ambient environment: compartments

    sediment and soil (source: [UNEP/POPS/POPRC.6/INF/25]). Unless otherwise

    stated concentrations are indicated in ng/g dry weight (= ppb dry weight). ................. 360

    Table 6-69: Product types, products and the relevance related to the use of HBCD in the EU

    according to different sources ........................................................................................ 368

    Table 6-70: Estimated consumption in tonnes of HBCD in the EU for the relevant applications

    (based on data from [ECB 2008], [Nordic COM 2007], [IOM 2008], [PS foam 2011]) .... 369

    Table 6-71: Lifetimes of relevant products ........................................................................................ 370

    Table 6-72: Cumulated use, release and disposal of HBCD consumed from 1988 to 2010 (in

    tonnes) ............................................................................................................................ 371

    Table 6-73: Cumulated HBCD quantities in waste from estimated use from 1988 to 2017 (in

    tonnes) ............................................................................................................................ 372

    Table 6-74: HBCD content for different product categories according to several sources ............... 372

    Table 6-75: Cumulated quantities of waste containing HBCD from estimated use of HBCD from

    1988 to 2017 ................................................................................................................... 373

    Table 6-76: Waste categories and EWC numbers and description for waste from HIPS end-

    products .......................................................................................................................... 405

    Table 6-77: Physico-chemical properties of PCP ([UNECE 2010], [LfU 1996], [IEP 2002]) ................ 420

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xi

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 6-78: Levels of PCP in sediment and soil (DW: dry weight; ww: wet weight; ND: not

    detected) [LfU 1996] ....................................................................................................... 421

    Table 6-79: Levels of PCP in sewage sludge including hot spot levels (DW: dry weight) .................. 422

    Table 6-80: PCP production and import in the EU 27 ........................................................................ 431

    Table 6-81: Annual disposal of PCP in production and remaining amount for future disposal in

    the EU 27 ......................................................................................................................... 432

    Table 6-82: PCPL production and import in the EU 27 ...................................................................... 437

    Table 6-83: Annual disposal of PCPL in production and remaining amount for future disposal

    in the EU 27 ..................................................................................................................... 438

    Table 6-84: Levels of HCBD in sediment and soil including hot spots (DW: dry weight) ([Euro

    Chlor 2004]; [IPCS 1993, IPCS 1994]; [CEPA 1999]) ........................................................ 444

    Table 6-85: Overview of magnesium production quantities in European Countries [IMA 2009] ..... 455

    Table 6-86: Production sites of tri- (TrCE), tetrachloroethylene (TeCE) and tetrachloromethane

    (TCM) in Europe [ESIS 2010] ........................................................................................... 461

    Table 6-87: HCBD amounts resulting considering different recycling/incineration ratios (1, 10

    and 50%) and different destruction efficiencies for incineration (99.90, 99.95 and

    99.99 %) .......................................................................................................................... 463

    Table 6-88: Annual amount of urban sewage sludge generated in the EU 27 with relevance for

    the HCBD mass- and waste flow ..................................................................................... 466

    Table 6-89: Treatment of urban sewage sludge in Member States (PT, DK: no data; MT: no

    production) ..................................................................................................................... 467

    Table 6-90: HCBD mass flow for sewage sludge in EU 27 .................................................................. 468

    Table 6-91: Names and CAS numbers for PCN groups ...................................................................... 475

    Table 6-92: Chemical and physical properties of polychlorinated naphthalenes [NICNAS 2002] ..... 476

    Table 6-93: Levels of PCNs in sediment and soil including hot spots (DW: dry weight) ([GRL

    2004]; [Haskoning 2002]; [IPCS 2001]; [ITM 1991]; [Bidleman et al. 2010]; [Brack

    2001, 2008]; [Castells 2008]; [Krauss and Wilcke 2003]; [Bogdal et al. 2006];

    [Wyrzykowska 2007]) ...................................................................................................... 478

    Table 6-94: Estimated production of PCNs from Technical PCB mixtures based on [Yamashita

    et al. 2000] and [Taniyasu et al. 2003] ............................................................................ 482

    Table 6-95: Quantities of MSW generated in EU 27 and amounts of MSW incinerated in EU 27

    in 2008 ............................................................................................................................ 492

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xii

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 6-96: PCN mass flow for MSWI in EU 27 .................................................................................. 493

    Table 6-97: Health care waste, including biological waste, generated and treated by

    incineration in the EU 27 in 2008 [EUROSTAT 2010] ...................................................... 499

    Table 6-98: PCN mass flow from hospital waste incineration (HospWI) in EU 27 ............................. 500

    Table 6-99: Annual consumption of solid fuels, wood and mixed solid fuels for domestic

    burning in EU 27 in 2008 ................................................................................................. 503

    Table 6-100: PCN mass flow for domestic burning of wood and solid fuels in EU 27 .................... 505

    Table 6-101: Annual amount of sewage sludge in the EU 27 ......................................................... 509

    Table 6-102: Treatment of urban sewage sludge in Member States (PT, DK: no data; MT: no

    production) ..................................................................................................................... 510

    Table 6-103: PCN mass flow for sewage sludge in EU 27 .................................................................... 510

    Table 6-104: European production of secondary copper for 1997 [BREF NFM 2001]. ....................... 516

    Table 6-105: PCN mass flow for secondary copper production in EU ................................................. 517

    Table 6-106: European production of secondary aluminium (reference years: [BREF NFM 2001]

    for 1997 and EUROSTAT, annual PRODCOM for 2001) .................................................. 521

    Table 6-107: PCN mass flow for secondary aluminium production in EU 27 ...................................... 522

    Table 6-108: Production of crude steel in EU 27 ................................................................................. 526

    Table 6-109: PCN mass flow for iron sintering in EU 27 (average values between 2004 and

    2010) ............................................................................................................................... 527

    Table 6-110: Selected innovative remediation methods considered to be appropriate for the

    remediation of sites contaminated with POPs (based on [ITVA 2010] .......................... 533

    Table 7-1: Comparison of screening methods [WRAP 2005]........................................................... 543

    Table 7-2: Standard substances used in reviewed analytical methods as Indicator isomers ...... 545

    Table 7-3: Summary of the results of a survey on analytical methods to be considered for

    PBDE analysis reported in literature ............................................................................... 547

    Table 7-4: Certified reference materials commercially available from IRMM. Values in

    brackets are not certified. Uncertainties are expanded uncertainties

    corresponding to a level of confidence of about 95 %. .................................................. 548

    Table 7-5: Summary of the results of a survey on standardised analytical methods to be

    considered for PBDE analysis. ......................................................................................... 550

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xiii

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 7-6: First assessment of the suitability of the different analytical methods to detect

    PBDEs .............................................................................................................................. 552

    Table 7-7: Summary of the results of a survey on standardised analytical methods and

    methods reported in literature to be considered for PFOS analysis. ............................. 557

    Table 7-8: Summary of the results of a survey on standardised analytical methods to be

    considered for PeCB analysis. ......................................................................................... 561

    Table 7-9: Summary of the results of a survey on standardised analytical methods and

    methods reported in literature to be considered for SCCP analysis. ............................. 575

    Table 8-1: Overview of the waste amounts concerned at different potential low POP content

    limits (LPCL) ..................................................................................................................... 602

    Table 8-2: Overview of contribution of waste amounts contaminated with PFOS from specific

    sectors at different LPCL set ........................................................................................... 605

    Table 8-3: Overview of contribution of waste amounts contaminated with PFOS from specific

    sectors at different LPCL set ........................................................................................... 612

    Table 8-4: Waste covered by different low POP concentration limits (*min: EPS and XPS C&D

    waste and EPS/XPS other than C&D waste is separately treated; *max: EPS and

    XPS C&D waste and EPS/XPS other than C&D waste is treated together with non-

    contaminated waste fractions) ....................................................................................... 614

    Table 8-5: Prognosis HBCD waste flows for 2015, 2020, 2030 and 2040 ........................................ 631

    Table 9-1: Limits of quantification for new POPs and candidate POPs in most unfavourable

    relevant matrices ............................................................................................................ 651

    Table 9-2: Results for limitation criterion B ..................................................................................... 659

    Table 9-3: Correlation of low POP concentration limit quantities of POP waste ............................ 665

    Table 9-4: Overview of current waste management options (status quo)...................................... 666

    Table 9-5: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for TetraBDE ............ 667

    Table 9-6: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for PentaBDE ........... 668

    Table 9-7: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for HexaBDE ............ 669

    Table 9-8: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for HeptaBDE .......... 670

    Table 9-9: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for PFOS .................. 672

    Table 9-10: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for PeCB .................. 673

    Table 9-11: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for SCCP ................... 674

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xiv

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 9-12: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for HBCD.................. 675

    Table 9-13: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for PCP .................... 676

    Table 9-14: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for HCBD.................. 677

    Table 9-15: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for PCNs .................... 677

    Table 9-16: Summary overview of capacity needs in incineration/energy recovery at LPCL in

    the dimension of ppm ..................................................................................................... 678

    Table 9-17: Summary overview of PeCB and PCNs containing waste on capacity needs in

    incineration and landfilling at LPCL in the dimension of ppb. ........................................ 679

    Table 9-18: Overview of affected waste amounts for other treatment by setting the LPCL. ........... 679

    Table 9-19: Capacity of treatment facilities in 2004 and 2006 in EU 27 (source: EUROSTAT) .......... 680

    Table 9-20: Correlation of capacity needs and available capacity..................................................... 680

    Table 9-21: Costs for relevant waste management option in the UK ............................................... 685

    Table 9-22: Costs for relevant waste management options .............................................................. 686

    Table 9-23: Waste requiring additional incineration or other treatment at set LPCL (t/y) and

    related cost estimates .................................................................................................... 686

    Table 9-24: Significant LPCL values for criterion D ............................................................................ 689

    Table 9-25: Relevant European legislation (PBDEs) ........................................................................... 690

    Table 9-26: Relevant national legislation (PBDEs) ............................................................................. 691

    Table 9-27: Relevant European legislation (PFOS) ............................................................................. 691

    Table 9-28: Relevant national legislation (PFOS) ............................................................................... 691

    Table 9-29: Relevant European legislation (PeCB) ............................................................................. 693

    Table 9-30: Relevant national legislation (PeCB) ............................................................................... 693

    Table 9-31: Relevant European legislation (SCCP) ............................................................................. 693

    Table 9-32: Relevant national legislation (SCCP) ............................................................................... 693

    Table 9-33: Relevant European legislation (HBCD) ............................................................................ 693

    Table 9-34: Relevant European legislation (PCP) ............................................................................... 694

    Table 9-35: Relevant national legislation (PCP) ................................................................................. 694

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xv

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 9-36: Relevant national legislation (HCBD) .............................................................................. 694

    Table 9-37: Overview of most relevant exposure pathways of new and candidate POP

    substances ...................................................................................................................... 696

    Table 9-38: Overview of most relevant information on occupational exposure ............................... 698

    Table 9-39: Overview of occupational exposure and/or emission limit values (OEL) ....................... 699

    Table 9-40: Overview of tolerable daily intake (TDI), estimated daily intakes and minimal risk

    levels (MRL) for new POPs and candidate POPs ............................................................. 700

    Table 9-41: Overview of lower limitations for LPCLs for new POPs .................................................. 708

    Table 9-42: Overview of upper limitations for LPCLs for new POPs .................................................. 708

    Table 9-43: Conclusions for LPCLs for new POPs based on results from upper and lower

    limitation criteria ............................................................................................................ 709

    Table 9-44: Quantity of waste considered as POP waste at different LPCL (TetraBDE) .................... 711

    Table 9-45: Quantity of waste considered as POP waste at different LPCL (PentaBDE) ................... 711

    Table 9-46: Quantity of waste considered as POP waste at different LPCL (HexaBDE) .................... 712

    Table 9-47: Quantity of waste considered as POP waste at different LPCL (HeptaBDE) ................... 712

    Table 9-48: Overview of preferred proposals (LPCL 1) and alternative transitional or restricted

    proposals (LPCL 2) for LPCLs ........................................................................................... 728

    Table 9-49: Recommendations for the surface sealing of landfills according to 1999/31/EC .......... 731

    Table 9-50: Overview of target concentrations in surface water, effluent limit concentration,

    lowest observed environmental concentration ............................................................. 732

    Table 9-51: Examples for wastes that may exhibit concentrations above the proposed MPCL

    limit ................................................................................................................................. 738

    Table 9-52: Overview of relevant recycling activities, proposed measures and assessment of

    corresponding impacts ................................................................................................... 744

    Table 9-53: Compilation of limit values proposed in the interim report for PDBE congener

    groups relevant for C-OctaBDE and of limit values theoretically derived from limit

    values established under RoHS. ...................................................................................... 748

    Table 9-54: Evaluation of the appropriateness of disposal and recovery operation according to

    Annex V, part 1 of the POP regulation for the new and candidate POPs ....................... 760

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xvi

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Table 10-1: Overview of preferred proposals (LPCL 1) and alternative transitional or restricted

    proposals (LPCL 2) for Low POP Concentration Limits (LPCLs) referred to in Article

    7(4)(a) and to be specified in Annex IV of the POP Regulation. ..................................... 773

    Table 10-2: Overview of preferred proposals (MPCL 1) and alternative transitional proposals

    (MPCL 2) for Maximum POP Concentration Limits (MPCLs) to be specified in

    Annex V, Parat 2 of the POP Regulation ......................................................................... 774

    Table 10-3: Waste quantities concerned by the proposed LPCLs ..................................................... 774

    Table 10-4: Impacts of the proposed limit values for PBDEs in terms of POP substance

    quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,

    possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the

    elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 778

    Table 10-5: Impacts of the proposed limit values for PFOS in terms of POP substance

    quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,

    possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the

    elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 783

    Table 10-6: Impacts of the proposed limit values for PeCB in terms of POP substance

    quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,

    possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the

    elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 787

    Table 10-7: Impacts of the proposed limit values for SCCP in terms of POP substance

    quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,

    possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the

    elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 788

    Table 10-8: Impacts of the proposed limit values for HBCD in terms of POP substance

    quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,

    possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the

    elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 790

    Table 10-9: Impacts of the proposed limit values for PCP in terms of POP substance quantities,

    related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management, possible

    effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the elimination

    capacity (Reference year: 2010) ..................................................................................... 793

    Table 10-10: Impacts of the proposed limit values for HCBD in terms of POP substance

    quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,

    possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the

    elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 794

    Table 10-11: Impacts of the proposed limit values for PCN in terms of POP substance

    quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xvii

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the

    elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 795

    Table 10-12: Overview of relevant waste management activities, proposed measures and

    assessment of corresponding impacts............................................................................ 796

    Table 10-13: Impact of proposed LPCLs and related measures on current recycling activity ............. 798

    Table 12-1: Overview of information submitted by stakeholders on commercial PentaBDE,

    OctaBDE, PFOS, its salts and PFOSF ................................................................................ 819

    Table 12-2: Overview of information submitted by stakeholders on PeCB ...................................... 823

    Table 12-3: Overview of information submitted by stakeholders on candidate POPs ..................... 825

    Table 12-4: Overview of information submitted from the European Parties to the Stockholm

    Convention (Questionnaire SC 4/19, Part II, Section A and B) on commercial

    PentaBDE and commercial OctaBDE............................................................................... 828

    Table 12-5: Overview of information submitted from the European Parties to the Stockholm

    Convention (Questionnaire SC 4/19, Part III, Section A and B) on Perfluorooctane

    sulfonic acid (PFOS), its salts and perfluoroctane sulfonyl fluoride (PFOSF) .................. 831

    Table 12-6: Overview of information submitted from the European Parties to the Stockholm

    Convention (Questionnaire SC 4/19, Part IV) on PeCB and other chemicals listed in

    Annex A at the fourth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties .................................. 833

    Table 12-7: Physico-chemical and toxicological properties of POPs ................................................. 835

    Table 12-8: Overview of number and capacity of treatment facilities in 2004 and 2006 at

    country level (source: EUROSTAT) .................................................................................. 838

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xviii

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    List of Figures

    Figure 5-1: General structure of the mass flow (macro dimension) * including recovery

    operation R1 (Use principally as a fuel or other means to generate energy) .................. 61

    Figure 5-2: Example for process specific differentiation of residues and emissions in the mass

    flow (micro dimension) ..................................................................................................... 62

    Figure 5-3: Overall mass flow from C-PentaBDE from sources to current disposal/recovery

    operations in the EU ......................................................................................................... 72

    Figure 5-4: Relative distribution of environment emissions from investigated sectors in the EU ..... 73

    Figure 5-5: Relative distribution of discharge of C-PentaBDE to waste from investigated

    sectors in the EU ............................................................................................................... 74

    Figure 5-6: Relative importance of different waste treatment options for the C-PentaBDE flow

    in the EU ............................................................................................................................ 75

    Figure 5-7: Overall mass flow from C-OctaBDE from sources to current disposal/recovery

    operations in the EU (*Scenario 2: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE plastic successfully

    separated and incinerated, R1/D10) ................................................................................ 77

    Figure 5-8: Relative importance of different waste treatment options for the C-OctaBDE flow

    in the EU (*C-OctaBDE containing WEEE successfully separated and incinerated,

    R1/D10) (*Scenario 2: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE plastic successfully separated

    and incinerated, R1/D10) .................................................................................................. 79

    Figure 5-9: Overall mass flow from PFOS from sources to current disposal/recovery

    operations in the EU ......................................................................................................... 80

    Figure 5-10: Contribution of the relevant sectors to the EU 27 to PFOS emissions to

    environment and discharge to waste ............................................................................... 81

    Figure 5-11: Relative distribution of PFOS emissions to the environment from investigated

    sectors in EU 27 ................................................................................................................ 82

    Figure 5-12: Relative distribution to PFOS waste from investigated sectors in EU 27 ......................... 82

    Figure 5-13: Relative importance of different waste treatment options and uses in products

    with respect to the PFOS mass flow in EU 27 ................................................................... 84

    Figure 5-14: Overview of PeCB substance flow .................................................................................... 88

    Figure 5-15: Contribution of the relevant sectors to the EU 27 to PeCB emissions to

    environment and discharge to waste ............................................................................... 89

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xix

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Figure 5-16: Relative distribution of PeCB emissions to the environment from investigated

    sectors in EU 27 ................................................................................................................ 90

    Figure 5-17: Relative PeCB distribution to waste from investigated sectors in EU 27 ......................... 90

    Figure 5-18: Relative importance of different waste treatment options with respect to the

    PeCB mass flow in EU 27 ................................................................................................... 92

    Figure 5-19: Means and ranges of recent PeCB contamination in different waste types in EU 27 ...... 93

    Figure 5-20: Overall mass flow for SCCPs from relevant sources to current disposal/recovery

    operations in the EU 27. ................................................................................................... 95

    Figure 5-21: Relative distribution of environment emissions from investigated sectors in the EU

    27 ...................................................................................................................................... 96

    Figure 5-22: Relative distribution of discharge of SCCP to waste from investigated sectors in

    the EU 27 ........................................................................................................................... 97

    Figure 5-23: Relative importance of different waste treatment options for the SCCP flow in the

    EU ...................................................................................................................................... 98

    Figure 5-24: Overall substance flow of HBCD from relevant sources to current

    disposal/recovery operations in the EU (*Scenario 2: HBCD containing waste not

    separated from other plastic C&D waste or MSW) ........................................................ 100

    Figure 5-25: Relative distribution of environment emissions from investigated sectors in the EU ... 101

    Figure 5-26: Relative distribution of discharge of HBCD to waste from investigated sectors in

    the EU.............................................................................................................................. 102

    Figure 5-27: Contribution of the relevant sectors to the HBCD discharge to waste in the EU

    (~2030 and ~2040) .......................................................................................................... 102

    Figure 5-28: Relative importance of different waste treatment options for the HBCD flow in the

    EU (*In case the HBCD containing waste is not separated)............................................ 104

    Figure 5-29: Estimated average (ea) and ranges of HBCD contamination in relevant wastes ........... 105

    Figure 5-30: Overall mass flow from PCP from sources to current disposal/recovery operations

    in the EU .......................................................................................................................... 107

    Figure 5-31: Contribution of the relevant sectors to the EU 27 to PCP emissions to environment

    and discharge to waste ................................................................................................... 108

    Figure 5-32: Relative importance of different waste treatment options with respect to the

    PFOS mass flow in EU 27 ................................................................................................. 109

    Figure 5-33: Overview of PCN substance flow .................................................................................... 113

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xx

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Figure 5-34: Contribution of the relevant sectors to the EU 27 to PCN emissions to

    environment and discharge to waste ............................................................................. 114

    Figure 5-35: Relative distribution of PCN emissions to the environment from investigated

    sectors in EU 27 .............................................................................................................. 115

    Figure 5-36: Relative PCN distribution to waste from investigated sectors in EU 27 ......................... 115

    Figure 5-37: Relative importance of different waste treatment options with respect to the PCN

    mass flow in EU 27 .......................................................................................................... 117

    Figure 5-38: Means and ranges of recent H contamination in different waste types in EU 27 .......... 118

    Figure 6-1: Comparison of congener patterns obtained from the sediment sample collected

    5m downstream of the effluent discharge, and the effluent sample collected at

    the discharge to the river [Eljarrat et al. 2007] .............................................................. 125

    Figure 6-2: Overview of the amounts of C-PentaBDE used in the EU ............................................... 130

    Figure 6-3: Overview of the amounts of C-PentaBDE imported in finished articles ......................... 131

    Figure 6-4: Estimated consumption of C-PentaBDE in Europe [Prevedouros et al. 2004a] ............. 132

    Figure 6-5: Overview of historic uses of C-PentaBDE and their relevance [inspired by SFT

    2009] ............................................................................................................................... 135

    Figure 6-6: Overview of the substance flow contributing to the sources of C-PentaBDE in the

    EU .................................................................................................................................... 137

    Figure 6-7: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products (automotive industry) ......................... 140

    Figure 6-8: Number of cars and year of the first registration of cars, which were scrapped

    within the German scrapping scheme in 2009 ............................................................... 142

    Figure 6-9: Estimated accumulated amount of C-PentaBDE (automotive applications) .................. 143

    Figure 6-10: ELV arising and treatment in the EU [GHK 2006] ........................................................... 144

    Figure 6-11: C-PentaBDE flow in automotive applications ................................................................. 148

    Figure 6-12: Waste flow for C-PentaBDE automotive applications .................................................... 149

    Figure 6-13: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products (upholstery) ......................................... 150

    Figure 6-14: Estimated accumulated amount of C-PentaBDE in upholstery applications .................. 152

    Figure 6-15: C-PentaBDE flow in upholstery applications .................................................................. 154

    Figure 6-16: Waste flow for C-PentaBDE in upholstery applications .................................................. 154

    Figure 6-17: Summary of main historic uses of C-OctaBDE ................................................................ 170

    file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457158file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457158file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457159file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457159file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457160file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457164file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457166file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457169file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457170

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xxi

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Figure 6-18: Overview of the substance flow contributing to the sources of C-OctaBDE in the

    EU .................................................................................................................................... 171

    Figure 6-19: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products (EEE) .................................................... 173

    Figure 6-20: Estimated accumulated amount of C-OctaBDE in EEE ................................................... 178

    Figure 6-21: C-OctaBDE flow (Scenario 1: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE treated together with

    WEEE categories 3 and 4) ............................................................................................... 180

    Figure 6-22: C-OctaBDE flow (*Scenario 2: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE successfully separated

    and incinerated, R1/D10) ................................................................................................ 181

    Figure 6-23: Waste flow for C-OctaBDE and relevant congener groups in WEEE plastics

    (Scenario 1: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE plastics treated together with WEEE

    plastics categories 3 and 4) ............................................................................................. 182

    Figure 6-24: Waste flow for C-OctaBDE and relevant congener groups in WEEE plastics

    (*Scenario 2: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE plastics successfully separated and

    incinerated, R1/D10) ....................................................................................................... 182

    Figure 6-25: Change in the use of PFOS in the semiconductor industry in the EU (annual

    consumption of PFOS for the use in different applications from 2000 to 2010) ........... 195

    Figure 6-26: Use of PFOS in the metal plating industry in Europe (estimation based on several

    sources) ........................................................................................................................... 203

    Figure 6-27: Substance flow PFOS from the sector of metal plating .................................................. 205

    Figure 6-28: PFOS related waste flow related to the metal plating industry ..................................... 207

    Figure 6-29: Illustration of the estimated use of PFOS in the photographic industry from 2000

    to 2010 ............................................................................................................................ 213

    Figure 6-30: Illustration of the PFOS flows from the photographic industry ...................................... 215

    Figure 6-31: Substance flow PFOS from the photographic industry ................................................... 216

    Figure 6-32: PFOS related waste flow from the photographic industry ............................................. 217

    Figure 6-33: PFOS substance flow related to use in hydraulic fluid in the aviation industry ............. 221

    Figure 6-34: Waste flow for hydraulic fluids for use in the aviation industry in EU 27 ...................... 221

    Figure 6-35: Time trend of reduction of PFOS quantities stored in fire fighting foams from 2004

    until 2012 in the EU ........................................................................................................ 224

    Figure 6-36: Corrected time trend of reduction of PFOS quantities stored in fire fighting foams

    from 2004 until 2012 in the EU ....................................................................................... 225

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xxii

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Figure 6-37: Sales volume of PFOS containing fire fighting foams in the Netherlands from one

    company ......................................................................................................................... 227

    Figure 6-38: Assessment of the PFOS flow related to use in fire fighting foams estimated for

    2010 in EU 27 .................................................................................................................. 229

    Figure 6-39: Waste flow for fire fighting foams in EU 27 .................................................................... 230

    Figure 6-40: Overview of the leather production of different EU Member states

    [Euroleather_2010] ......................................................................................................... 233

    Figure 6-41: Reduction of PFOS contained in upholstery in households ............................................ 235

    Figure 6-42: Substance flow of PFOS in the leather industry. ............................................................ 236

    Figure 6-43: Material flow of PFOS in the leather industry ................................................................ 237

    Figure 6-44: Input/Output overview of PFOS use for carpets............................................................ 238

    Figure 6-45: Substance flow of PFOS in the leather industry ............................................................. 241

    Figure 6-46: Material flow of PFOS in the carpet industry ................................................................. 241

    Figure 6-47: PFOS relevant Input/Output overview of sewage sludge .............................................. 242

    Figure 6-48: Substance flow of PFOS in sewage sludge ...................................................................... 245

    Figure 6-49: Material flow of PFOS in sewage sludge ......................................................................... 246

    Figure 6-50: Overview of PeCB releases to water and soil from facilities in Europe in 2008

    [PRTR 2008] ..................................................................................................................... 262

    Figure 6-51: Overview of possibly relevant sources of PeCB in Europe ............................................. 262

    Figure 6-52: Overview of initial PeCB substance flow ........................................................................ 266

    Figure 6-53: Relevant input and output from municipal solid waste incineration ............................. 269

    Figure 6-54: Assessment of PeCB flow related to MSWI .................................................................... 274

    Figure 6-55: Detailed waste flow for MSWI in EU 27 .......................................................................... 275

    Figure 6-56: Relevant input and output of hazardous waste incineration and relevance of other

    hazardous waste management options (values [EUROSTAT 2010]) .............................. 276

    Figure 6-57: Assessment of the PeCB flow related to hazardous waste incineration ........................ 279

    Figure 6-58: Detailed waste flow for HWI in EU 27 ............................................................................ 280

    Figure 6-59: Relevant input and output of power production ........................................................... 281

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xxiii

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Figure 6-60: Assessment of the PeCB flow related to power production from coal and lignite ........ 285

    Figure 6-61: Detailed waste flow for coal fired power plants in EU 27 in 2008 ................................. 286

    Figure 6-62: Relevant input and output of waste water treatment ................................................... 287

    Figure 6-63: Assessment of the PeCB flow related to sewage sludge ................................................ 290

    Figure 6-64: Waste flow for sewage sludge in EU 27 .......................................................................... 291

    Figure 6-65: Relevant input and output of domestic burning ............................................................ 292

    Figure 6-66: Assessment of the PeCB flow related to domestic burning ........................................... 295

    Figure 6-67: Detailed waste flow for domestic burning of wood, solid fossil fuels (coal and

    derivates) and mixed wastes in EU 27 ............................................................................. 296

    Figure 6-68: Total annual Sales of SCCP in the EU 1994-2009 [SCCP RPA 2010] (provided by

    Eurochlor) ....................................................................................................................... 308

    Figure 6-69: Trend of the use of SCCP in the rubber industry within the EU 27 ................................ 313

    Figure 6-70: Input/Output of SCCP in the rubber industry ................................................................. 313

    Figure 6-71: Substance flow of SCCP in the rubber industry .............................................................. 318

    Figure 6-72: Material flow of SCCP in the rubber industry ................................................................. 319

    Figure 6-73: Annual consumption of SCCP for sealant and adhesives from 1994 to 2010. ............... 321

    Figure 6-74: Input/Output of SCCP in the rubber industry ................................................................. 322

    Figure 6-75: Substance flow of SCCP in sealants and adhesives ......................................................... 325

    Figure 6-76: Material flow of SCCP in sealants and adhesives ........................................................... 325

    Figure 6-77: Annual consumption of SCCP for paint and varnishes. .................................................. 326

    Figure 6-78: Input/Output of SCCP in the rubber industry ................................................................. 328

    Figure 6-79: Substance flow of SCCP paint ......................................................................................... 331

    Figure 6-80: Material flow of SCCP in paints and varnishes ............................................................... 333

    Figure 6-81: Used amount of SCCP in the textile industry .................................................................. 335

    Figure 6-82: Material flow of SCCP in the plastic industry .................................................................. 335

    Figure 6-83: Material flow of SCCP in the plastic industry .................................................................. 338

    Figure 6-84: Material flow of SCCP in the plastic industry .................................................................. 339

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xxiv

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    Figure 6-85: SCCP relevant Input/Output overview of sewage sludge ............................................... 341

    Figure 6-86: Substance flow of SCCP in sewage sludge ...................................................................... 343

    Figure 6-87: Material flow of SCCP in sewage sludge ......................................................................... 344

    Figure 6-88: Use of SCCP in the EU leather industry. .......................................................................... 346

    Figure 6-89: Input/Output flow of SCCP in the leather industry. ........................................................ 346

    Figure 6-90: Substance flow of SCCP used in the leather industry ..................................................... 349

    Figure 6-91: Waste flow of SCCP containing products from the leather industry .............................. 350

    Figure 6-92: Estimation of the consumption of HBCD in tonnes in Europe since the late

    1980ies until 2010 (estimation based on data from [ECB 2008], [Nordic COM

    2007], [IOM 2008], [PS foam 2011]) ............................................................................... 367

    Figure 6-93: Modelled consumption of HBCD in Europe and comparison with data provided by

    BSEF/CEFIC and the estimate in the EU risk draft [Morf 2007] ...................................... 367

    Figure 6-94: Relevance of product types with respect to the HBCD consumption for the year

    2009 (Figures indicate the HBCD content)...................................................................... 374

    Figure 6-95: Relevance of product types with respect to the HBCD consumption for the year

    2003 (Figures indicate the HBCD content)...................................................................... 375

    Figure 6-96: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products (HBCD treated EPS) ............................. 377

    Figure 6-97: Estimated annual quantity of HBCD in EPS waste from construction and

    demolition that will be disposed of until 2060 (calculation based on the

    consumption figures provided in Table 6-70; lifetime 50 +/- 25 years; 1% cut offs

    becoming waste at the construction site taken into account) ....................................... 383

    Figure 6-98: HBCD substance flow EPS products for construction (Scenario 1: HBCD containing

    EPS waste separated) ...................................................................................................... 385

    Figure 6-99: HBCD substance flow EPS products for construction (Scenario 2: HBCD containing

    EPS waste not separated but treated with the plastic fraction of C&D waste) .............. 386

    Figure 6-100: EPS waste flow (Scenario 1: HBCD containing EPS waste separated) ....................... 387

    Figure 6-101: EPS waste flow (Scenario 2: HBCD containing EPS waste not separated but

    treated with the plastic fraction of C&D waste) ............................................................. 387

    Figure 6-102: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products in XPS manufacturing ..................... 390

    Figure 6-103: Estimated annual quantity of HBCD in XPS waste from construction that will be

    disposed of until 2060 (calculation based on the consumption figures provided

  • No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xxv

    European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs

    inTable 6-70; lifetime 50 +/- 25 years; 1% cut offs becoming waste at the

    construction site taken into account) ............................................................................. 392

    Figure 6-104: HBCD substance flow XPS products for construction (Scenario 1: HBCD

    containing XPS waste separated) .................................................................................... 393

    Figure 6-105: HBCD substance flow XPS products for construction (Scenario 2: HBCD

    containing XPS waste not separated but treated with the plastic fraction from

    C&D waste) ..................................................................................................................... 394

    Figure 6-106: HBCD treated XPS waste flow (Scenario 1: XPS waste separated) ............................ 395

    Figure 6-107: XPS waste flow (Scenario 2: XPS waste not separated)............................................. 395

    Figure 6-108: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products (EPS/XPS outside the

    construction sector) ........................................................................................................ 397

    Figure 6-109: Estimated annual quantity of HBCD in EPS/XPS waste from non-construction

    uses that will be disposed of until around 2040 (calculation