Upload
truongnga
View
224
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Service request under the framework contract
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066
FINAL REPORT
Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
25 March 2011
(Update 13 April 2011)
Consortium ESWI
Expert Team to Support Waste Implementation
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 ii
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Content
1 Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 31
2 Background and objectives..................................................................................................... 39
3 Sources of Information ........................................................................................................... 44
3.1 Structure of required information .................................................................................................... 44
3.2 Questionnaire survey ........................................................................................................................ 44
3.3 European Commission ...................................................................................................................... 47
3.4 Expert meeting with Member States ................................................................................................ 47
3.5 Stakeholder consultation on the interim results .............................................................................. 47
3.6 Statistics, data bases and literature .................................................................................................. 48
4 Legal Situation ....................................................................................................................... 50
4.1 Legal Background at international and at EU level ........................................................................... 50
4.2 Additional regulation at Member States level .................................................................................. 59
5 Overview of mass flows of new POPs and candidate POPs ...................................................... 60
5.1 Objectives and methodology ............................................................................................................ 60
5.2 Sources of new POPs and candidate POPs entering articles, waste and the environment .............. 63
5.3 Investigated sectors .......................................................................................................................... 68
5.4 Overview of the substance flows ...................................................................................................... 71
5.5 Evaluation of the data quality and uncertainties ............................................................................ 119
6 Detailed mass flow analyses ................................................................................................. 122
6.1 C-PentaBDE flows ............................................................................................................................ 122
6.2 C-OctaBDE flows .............................................................................................................................. 161
6.3 PFOS flows ....................................................................................................................................... 187
6.4 PeCB flows ....................................................................................................................................... 251
6.5 SCCP flows ....................................................................................................................................... 302
6.6 HBCD flows ...................................................................................................................................... 356
6.7 PCP flows ......................................................................................................................................... 418
6.8 HCBD flows ...................................................................................................................................... 442
6.9 PCN flows ........................................................................................................................................ 474
6.10 Remediation methods for contaminated sites ............................................................................... 532
7 Measurement methods ........................................................................................................ 534
7.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 534
7.2 Problem of matrix inhomogeneity for measurement of POPs in waste matrices .......................... 535
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 iii
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
7.3 Basic principles of standard development ...................................................................................... 537
7.4 International Overview of Measurement Methods for new POPs and candidate POPs ................ 538
7.5 References ....................................................................................................................................... 580
8 Scenarios and Prognosis on future Development .................................................................. 593
8.1 Function of Limit Values under the EU POP Regulation ................................................................. 593
8.2 General Implications of Limit Values .............................................................................................. 594
8.3 Waste and Mass Flow Scenarios in Relation to Limit Values .......................................................... 595
8.4 Prognosis on future development .................................................................................................. 623
9 Low POP concentration limit and maximum POP concentration limit for POP waste .............. 634
9.1 Methodology to assess and suggest low POP concentration limit and maximum POP concentration limits ........................................................................................................................ 634
9.2 Proposals for low POP concentration limits .................................................................................... 650
9.3 Proposals for maximum POP content levels ................................................................................... 729
9.4 Impacts and Implications on Product and Waste Legislation ......................................................... 740
9.5 Impacts of proposed limit values on current recycling activities.................................................... 744
9.6 Possible implications of concentration limits for PBDEs in new articles produced from recycled materials above which the articles cannot be placed on the market ............................................. 756
9.7 Disposal and recovery operations for new and candidate POPs .................................................... 759
9.8 References ....................................................................................................................................... 769
10 Conclusions and recommendations ...................................................................................... 773
10.1 Low and Maximum POP Concentration Limits ............................................................................... 773
10.2 Relevance of Low and Maximum POP content levels for waste flows ........................................... 774
10.3 Proposed LPCLs and related impacts .............................................................................................. 776
10.4 Proposed measures and related impacts ........................................................................................ 796
10.5 Impacts of proposed limit values on current recycling activities.................................................... 798
10.6 Possible impacts on product and waste regulation ........................................................................ 800
10.7 Possible implications of concentration limits for PBDEs in new articles produced from recycled materials above which the articles cannot be placed on the market ............................................. 802
10.8 Measurement Methods .................................................................................................................. 803
11 General References .............................................................................................................. 804
12 Annex .................................................................................................................................. 806
12.1 Annex 1: Questionnaire .................................................................................................................. 807
12.2 Annex 2: Evaluation Questionnaire ................................................................................................. 819
12.3 Annex 3: Evaluation Questionnaire for submission of information on New POPs in accordance with SC-4/19 .................................................................................................................................... 828
12.4 Annex IV: Physico-chemical properties of POPs ............................................................................. 835
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 iv
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
12.5 Annex V: Number and capacity of treatment facilities in 2004 and 2006 at country level ............ 838
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 v
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
List of Tables
Table 1-1: Overview of preferred proposals (LPCL 1) and alternative transitional or restricted
proposals (LPCL 2) for Low POP Concentration Limits (LPCLs) referred to in Article
7(4)(a) and to be specified in Annex IV of the POP Regulation. ....................................... 35
Table 1-2: Overview of preferred proposals (MPCL 1) and alternative transitional proposals
(MPCL 2) for Maximum POP Concentration Limits (MPCLs) to be specified in
Annex V, Para 2 of the POP Regulation ............................................................................ 35
Table 2-1: List of new and candidate POPs ........................................................................................ 41
Table 3-1: Overview of contacted stakeholders ................................................................................ 46
Table 4-1: Overview of relevant legal documents addressing the selected substances ................... 58
Table 5-1: Relative importance of waste treatment options for MSW and similar waste
(based on [E-STAT 2010] data for the year 2008) ............................................................. 62
Table 5-2: Overview of sectors and their relevance in the scope of the present study .................... 69
Table 5-3: Overview of the contribution to the waste flow of the relevant congener groups to
the amount of C-PentaBDE in automotive and upholstery applications .......................... 72
Table 5-4: Emissions and discharge of C-PentaBDE from investigated sources in the EU ................ 73
Table 5-5: Quantitative contribution of C-PentaBDE from different sectors to currently used
disposal/recovery operations in the EU............................................................................ 74
Table 5-6: Annual amounts of C-PentaBDE containing residues and the ranges of
contamination with C-PentaBDE and corresponding C-PentaBDE amount in
investigated sectors in the EU; * ea = estimated average ................................................ 76
Table 5-7: Overview of the contribution of the relevant congener groups to the amount C-
OctaBDE for the EEE sector ............................................................................................... 78
Table 5-8: Emissions and discharge of C-OctaBDE from the investigated source in the EU ............. 78
Table 5-9: Quantitative contribution of C-OctaBDE to currently used disposal/recovery
operations in the EU ......................................................................................................... 78
Table 5-10: Annual amounts of C-OctaBDE containing residues and the ranges of
contamination with C-OctaBDE and corresponding C-OctaBDE amount in the EU;
*ea = estimated average ................................................................................................... 79
Table 5-11: Contribution of the relevant sectors in the EU 27 to PFOS in emissions, products
and waste .......................................................................................................................... 81
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 vi
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 5-12: Quantitative contribution of PFOS from the different sectors to currently used
disposal/recovery operations in EU 27 ............................................................................. 83
Table 5-13: Annual amounts of PFOS containing residues (wastes) and PFOS contamination
ranges................................................................................................................................ 85
Table 5-14: Contribution of the relevant sectors in the EU 27 to PeCB in emissions, products
and waste .......................................................................................................................... 89
Table 5-15: Quantitative contribution of PeCB from the different sectors to currently used
disposal/recovery operations in EU 27 ............................................................................. 91
Table 5-16: Annual amounts of PeCB containing residues (wastes) and PeCB contamination
ranges................................................................................................................................ 93
Table 5-17: Quantitative contribution of SCCP from different sectors to currently used
disposal/recovery operations in the EU 27 ....................................................................... 97
Table 5-18: Annual amounts of SCCP containing residues (waste and products) and the ranges
of contamination with SCCP and corresponding SCCP amount in investigated
sectors in the EU ............................................................................................................... 99
Table 5-19: Emissions and discharge of HBCD from investigated sources in the EU (2010) ............. 101
Table 5-20: Distribution of HBCD emissions to air, waste water and surface water ......................... 101
Table 5-21: Quantitative contribution of HBCD from different sectors to currently used
disposal/recovery operations in the EU (2010) .............................................................. 103
Table 5-22: Annual amounts of HBCD containing residues (waste and products) and the
ranges of contamination with HBCD and corresponding HBCD amount in
investigated sectors in the EU; *ea = estimated average (used for calculations) ........ 104
Table 5-23: Contribution of the relevant sectors in the EU 27 to PFOS in emissions, products
and waste ........................................................................................................................ 107
Table 5-24: Quantitative contribution of PCP from the different sectors to currently used
disposal/recovery operations in EU 27. .......................................................................... 108
Table 5-25: Annual amounts of PCP containing residues (wastes) and PFOS contamination
ranges.............................................................................................................................. 110
Table 5-26: Contribution of the relevant sectors in the EU 27 to PCN in emissions, products
and waste ........................................................................................................................ 114
Table 5-27: Quantitative contribution of PCNs from the different sectors to currently used
disposal/recovery operations in EU 27 ........................................................................... 116
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 vii
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 5-28: Annual amounts of PCN containing residues (wastes) and PCN contamination
ranges.............................................................................................................................. 118
Table 5-29: Indicative assessment of the data quality for new and candidate POPs for relevant
applications ..................................................................................................................... 120
Table 6-1: Composition of C-PentaBDE [Canada 2006; SFT 2009] .................................................. 123
Table 6-2: Levels of PentaBDE (BDE-99) in sediment and soil (DW: dry weight) [Penta_UNEP
2006] ............................................................................................................................... 123
Table 6-3: Hot spot levels of BDEs (total BDEs including BDE-47, BDE-99 and BDE-100) in soil
and sediment collected near a polyurethane foam manufacturing facility, levels
cited by [Watson et al. 2010] .......................................................................................... 123
Table 6-4: C-PentaBDE overview of use and imports for the EU ..................................................... 130
Table 6-5: C-PentaBDE concentrations in PUR foams ..................................................................... 134
Table 6-6: Share of exported new cars and ELVs [EUROSTAT 2010] ............................................... 141
Table 6-7: Estimated amount of C-PentaBDE in automotive applications in the EU ...................... 141
Table 6-8: Estimated accumulated consumption of C-PentaBDE in upholstery products .............. 151
Table 6-9: Composition of C-OctaBDE [Octa_UNEP 2008] .............................................................. 162
Table 6-10: Levels of C-OctaBDE* and its congeners in sediment and soil (DW: dry weight)
[Octa_UNEP 2007] .......................................................................................................... 162
Table 6-11: Levels of C-OctaBDE* and its congeners in sludges and coastal sediments receiving
industrial and municipal effluents (DW: dry weight) [Octa_UNEP 2007] ....................... 163
Table 6-12: Concentrations of OctaBDE in WEEE [Swiss 2003; CreaSolv 2004] ................................ 174
Table 6-13: Summary of Waste Management Options [SC-4/19: BG, DE, SE, AT and LT 2010] ........ 179
Table 6-14: Levels of PFOS in sediment and soil (DW: dry weight; ww: wet weight; ND: not
detected) [UNEP 2006b]; [HelsinkiComission_2009] ..................................................... 189
Table 6-15: Levels of PFOS in sewage sludge including hot spot levels (DW: dry weight);
[NRW_2009]; [BLU_2010]; [Weber et al. 2010]; [OECD_2002] ...................................... 189
Table 6-16: PFOS amounts currently used in the relevant industry sectors ..................................... 196
Table 6-17: Production amounts of relevant products containing PFOS in 2000 [UBA_2001] ......... 208
Table 6-18: Overview of PFOS quantities contained in products from the photographic
industry ........................................................................................................................... 210
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 viii
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 6-19: PFOS used in the different sections of the photographic industry between 2000
and 2010. ........................................................................................................................ 211
Table 6-20: Estimated quantities of PFOS containing fire fighting foams stored in EU and
estimated use quantities from 2004 to 2012 ................................................................. 224
Table 6-21: Corrected estimated quantities of PFOS containing fire fighting foams stored in EU
and estimated use quantities from 2004 to 2012 .......................................................... 225
Table 6-22: Overview of fire fighting foam quantities, related PFOS concentrations and
resulting PFOS amount in some Member States [CARACAL_2008] ............................... 226
Table 6-23: Sales volume of one fire fighting foam producer in the Netherlands [RIVM_2009] ...... 226
Table 6-24: Estimated sales volume between 1991 and 2006 using mean values. .......................... 227
Table 6-25: Comparison of worst case scenario mean value and best case. .................................... 227
Table 6-26: Information on fire fighting foam quantities, related PFOS concentrations and
resulting PFOS amounts for some Member States according to the UNEP
questionnaire .................................................................................................................. 228
Table 6-27: Annual European leather production from 1997 to 2002 [Euroleather_2010] ............. 233
Table 6-28: Reduction of PFOS contained in upholstery in households ............................................ 234
Table 6-29: Overview of tuft carpets ................................................................................................. 239
Table 6-30: measured PFOS concentration of sewage sludges exceeding 100 g/kg
[NRW_2007c] .................................................................................................................. 243
Table 6-31: Annual sewage sludge production in Europe [EUROSTAT 2010] .................................... 244
Table 6-32: Levels of PeCB in sediment and soil including hot spots (DW: dry weight)
([UNEP/POP/POPRC.3/20/Add.7]; [UNEP/POP/POPRC.3/INF/21]) ................................ 253
Table 6-33: Overview of quintozene production and use in the EU before its ban in 2002 ............. 259
Table 6-34: Overview of estimated annual global and Canadian emissions of PeCB [Bailey et al.
2009; Environment Canada 2005] .................................................................................. 261
Table 6-35: Quantities of MSW generated in EU 27 and amounts of MSW incinerated in EU 27
in 2008 ............................................................................................................................ 271
Table 6-36: PeCB mass flow for MSWI in EU 27 ................................................................................ 273
Table 6-37: Amount of hazardous waste incinerated in EU 27 in 2006 ............................................ 277
Table 6-38: PeCB mass flow from hazardous waste incineration (HWI) in EU 27 in 2006 ................ 278
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 ix
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 6-39: Annual consumption of solid fuels for power production in the EU in 2008 ................. 283
Table 6-40: Treatment of solid residues from power production in EU 15 in 1999 [BREF LPC
2004] ............................................................................................................................... 284
Table 6-41: PeCB mass flow from power production via coal, lignite and derivates in EU 27 in
2008 ................................................................................................................................ 284
Table 6-42: Annual amount of sewage sludge in the EU 27 .............................................................. 288
Table 6-43: Treatment of urban sewage sludge in Member States (PT, DK: no data; MT: no
production) ..................................................................................................................... 289
Table 6-44: PeCB mass flow for sewage sludge in EU 27 ................................................................... 289
Table 6-45: Annual consumption of solid fuels, wood and mixed solid fuels for domestic
burning in EU 27 in 2008 ................................................................................................. 293
Table 6-46: PeCB mass flow for domestic burning of wood and solid fuels in EU 27 ....................... 294
Table 6-47: Levels of SCCP in sediment and soil (DW: dry weight; ww: wet weight; ND: not
detected) [SCCP OSPAR 2001], [SCCP POPRC 6/11] ....................................................... 304
Table 6-48: Levels of SCCP in sewage sludge including hot spot levels (DW: dry weight) [SCCP
OSPAR 2001] [SCCP POPRC 6/11], [SCCP UBA 2006], [SCCP BUWAL 2003] ................... 305
Table 6-49: Implementation of PARCOM Decision 95/1 (t/y) [SCCP OSPAR 2006] ........................... 307
Table 6-50: Estimated tonnage of SCCPs used in the EU (t/y) ([SCCP ECHA 2008]; [SCCP RPA
2010]) .............................................................................................................................. 312
Table 6-51: Overview of the extrapolated SCCP consumption for EU 27 in the rubber industry
in the last decades. ......................................................................................................... 312
Table 6-52: Estimated tonnage of SCCP used for the production of conveyor belts in the EU
(t/y) ................................................................................................................................. 316
Table 6-53: Estimated tonnage of SCCP used in the EU (t/y) [SCCP ECHA 2008] .............................. 320
Table 6-54: Overview of SCCP and waste amounts in the EU 27 within the last 17 years ................ 321
Table 6-55: End-use market share of sealants and adhesive in the EU 27 in 2009 [SCCP RPA
2010] ............................................................................................................................... 323
Table 6-56: Estimated tonnage of SCCP used in the EU (t/y) [SCCP ECHA 2008] .............................. 326
Table 6-57: Overview of SCCP and waste amounts in the EU 27 within the last 17 years ................ 327
Table 6-58: Overview of the content of SCCPs in SCCP containing paints (t/y) [SCCP ECHA
2008] ............................................................................................................................... 329
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 x
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 6-59: Annually used amount of SCCP containing paint in the EU 27 ....................................... 332
Table 6-60: Estimated tonnage of SCCP used in the EU (t/y) for textiles ([SCCP ECHA 2008],
[SCCP RPA 2010]) ............................................................................................................ 334
Table 6-61: Overview of SCCP consumption and losses during production and life time within
the last 17 years. ............................................................................................................. 337
Table 6-62: Levels of SCCP in sewage sludge including hot spot levels (DW: dry weight) ................ 340
Table 6-63: Annual sewage sludge production in EU 27 [EUROSTAT 2010] ...................................... 342
Table 6-64: Estimated tonnage of SCCP used in the EU (t/y) [SCCP ECHA 2008] .............................. 345
Table 6-65: Overview of the use of SCCP in the leather industry since 1994 .................................... 347
Table 6-66: Possible quantities of SCCPs as impurities in MCCPs in different industry sectors if
former SCCP uses have been replaced by the use of MCCPs containing 1% SCCPs ....... 351
Table 6-67: Possible contributions to the use of SCCPs by impurities in MCCPs in different
industry sectors if former SCCP uses have been replaced by the use of MCCPs
containing 1% SCCPs ....................................................................................................... 352
Table 6-68: HBCD concentrations measured in the ambient environment: compartments
sediment and soil (source: [UNEP/POPS/POPRC.6/INF/25]). Unless otherwise
stated concentrations are indicated in ng/g dry weight (= ppb dry weight). ................. 360
Table 6-69: Product types, products and the relevance related to the use of HBCD in the EU
according to different sources ........................................................................................ 368
Table 6-70: Estimated consumption in tonnes of HBCD in the EU for the relevant applications
(based on data from [ECB 2008], [Nordic COM 2007], [IOM 2008], [PS foam 2011]) .... 369
Table 6-71: Lifetimes of relevant products ........................................................................................ 370
Table 6-72: Cumulated use, release and disposal of HBCD consumed from 1988 to 2010 (in
tonnes) ............................................................................................................................ 371
Table 6-73: Cumulated HBCD quantities in waste from estimated use from 1988 to 2017 (in
tonnes) ............................................................................................................................ 372
Table 6-74: HBCD content for different product categories according to several sources ............... 372
Table 6-75: Cumulated quantities of waste containing HBCD from estimated use of HBCD from
1988 to 2017 ................................................................................................................... 373
Table 6-76: Waste categories and EWC numbers and description for waste from HIPS end-
products .......................................................................................................................... 405
Table 6-77: Physico-chemical properties of PCP ([UNECE 2010], [LfU 1996], [IEP 2002]) ................ 420
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xi
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 6-78: Levels of PCP in sediment and soil (DW: dry weight; ww: wet weight; ND: not
detected) [LfU 1996] ....................................................................................................... 421
Table 6-79: Levels of PCP in sewage sludge including hot spot levels (DW: dry weight) .................. 422
Table 6-80: PCP production and import in the EU 27 ........................................................................ 431
Table 6-81: Annual disposal of PCP in production and remaining amount for future disposal in
the EU 27 ......................................................................................................................... 432
Table 6-82: PCPL production and import in the EU 27 ...................................................................... 437
Table 6-83: Annual disposal of PCPL in production and remaining amount for future disposal
in the EU 27 ..................................................................................................................... 438
Table 6-84: Levels of HCBD in sediment and soil including hot spots (DW: dry weight) ([Euro
Chlor 2004]; [IPCS 1993, IPCS 1994]; [CEPA 1999]) ........................................................ 444
Table 6-85: Overview of magnesium production quantities in European Countries [IMA 2009] ..... 455
Table 6-86: Production sites of tri- (TrCE), tetrachloroethylene (TeCE) and tetrachloromethane
(TCM) in Europe [ESIS 2010] ........................................................................................... 461
Table 6-87: HCBD amounts resulting considering different recycling/incineration ratios (1, 10
and 50%) and different destruction efficiencies for incineration (99.90, 99.95 and
99.99 %) .......................................................................................................................... 463
Table 6-88: Annual amount of urban sewage sludge generated in the EU 27 with relevance for
the HCBD mass- and waste flow ..................................................................................... 466
Table 6-89: Treatment of urban sewage sludge in Member States (PT, DK: no data; MT: no
production) ..................................................................................................................... 467
Table 6-90: HCBD mass flow for sewage sludge in EU 27 .................................................................. 468
Table 6-91: Names and CAS numbers for PCN groups ...................................................................... 475
Table 6-92: Chemical and physical properties of polychlorinated naphthalenes [NICNAS 2002] ..... 476
Table 6-93: Levels of PCNs in sediment and soil including hot spots (DW: dry weight) ([GRL
2004]; [Haskoning 2002]; [IPCS 2001]; [ITM 1991]; [Bidleman et al. 2010]; [Brack
2001, 2008]; [Castells 2008]; [Krauss and Wilcke 2003]; [Bogdal et al. 2006];
[Wyrzykowska 2007]) ...................................................................................................... 478
Table 6-94: Estimated production of PCNs from Technical PCB mixtures based on [Yamashita
et al. 2000] and [Taniyasu et al. 2003] ............................................................................ 482
Table 6-95: Quantities of MSW generated in EU 27 and amounts of MSW incinerated in EU 27
in 2008 ............................................................................................................................ 492
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xii
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 6-96: PCN mass flow for MSWI in EU 27 .................................................................................. 493
Table 6-97: Health care waste, including biological waste, generated and treated by
incineration in the EU 27 in 2008 [EUROSTAT 2010] ...................................................... 499
Table 6-98: PCN mass flow from hospital waste incineration (HospWI) in EU 27 ............................. 500
Table 6-99: Annual consumption of solid fuels, wood and mixed solid fuels for domestic
burning in EU 27 in 2008 ................................................................................................. 503
Table 6-100: PCN mass flow for domestic burning of wood and solid fuels in EU 27 .................... 505
Table 6-101: Annual amount of sewage sludge in the EU 27 ......................................................... 509
Table 6-102: Treatment of urban sewage sludge in Member States (PT, DK: no data; MT: no
production) ..................................................................................................................... 510
Table 6-103: PCN mass flow for sewage sludge in EU 27 .................................................................... 510
Table 6-104: European production of secondary copper for 1997 [BREF NFM 2001]. ....................... 516
Table 6-105: PCN mass flow for secondary copper production in EU ................................................. 517
Table 6-106: European production of secondary aluminium (reference years: [BREF NFM 2001]
for 1997 and EUROSTAT, annual PRODCOM for 2001) .................................................. 521
Table 6-107: PCN mass flow for secondary aluminium production in EU 27 ...................................... 522
Table 6-108: Production of crude steel in EU 27 ................................................................................. 526
Table 6-109: PCN mass flow for iron sintering in EU 27 (average values between 2004 and
2010) ............................................................................................................................... 527
Table 6-110: Selected innovative remediation methods considered to be appropriate for the
remediation of sites contaminated with POPs (based on [ITVA 2010] .......................... 533
Table 7-1: Comparison of screening methods [WRAP 2005]........................................................... 543
Table 7-2: Standard substances used in reviewed analytical methods as Indicator isomers ...... 545
Table 7-3: Summary of the results of a survey on analytical methods to be considered for
PBDE analysis reported in literature ............................................................................... 547
Table 7-4: Certified reference materials commercially available from IRMM. Values in
brackets are not certified. Uncertainties are expanded uncertainties
corresponding to a level of confidence of about 95 %. .................................................. 548
Table 7-5: Summary of the results of a survey on standardised analytical methods to be
considered for PBDE analysis. ......................................................................................... 550
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xiii
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 7-6: First assessment of the suitability of the different analytical methods to detect
PBDEs .............................................................................................................................. 552
Table 7-7: Summary of the results of a survey on standardised analytical methods and
methods reported in literature to be considered for PFOS analysis. ............................. 557
Table 7-8: Summary of the results of a survey on standardised analytical methods to be
considered for PeCB analysis. ......................................................................................... 561
Table 7-9: Summary of the results of a survey on standardised analytical methods and
methods reported in literature to be considered for SCCP analysis. ............................. 575
Table 8-1: Overview of the waste amounts concerned at different potential low POP content
limits (LPCL) ..................................................................................................................... 602
Table 8-2: Overview of contribution of waste amounts contaminated with PFOS from specific
sectors at different LPCL set ........................................................................................... 605
Table 8-3: Overview of contribution of waste amounts contaminated with PFOS from specific
sectors at different LPCL set ........................................................................................... 612
Table 8-4: Waste covered by different low POP concentration limits (*min: EPS and XPS C&D
waste and EPS/XPS other than C&D waste is separately treated; *max: EPS and
XPS C&D waste and EPS/XPS other than C&D waste is treated together with non-
contaminated waste fractions) ....................................................................................... 614
Table 8-5: Prognosis HBCD waste flows for 2015, 2020, 2030 and 2040 ........................................ 631
Table 9-1: Limits of quantification for new POPs and candidate POPs in most unfavourable
relevant matrices ............................................................................................................ 651
Table 9-2: Results for limitation criterion B ..................................................................................... 659
Table 9-3: Correlation of low POP concentration limit quantities of POP waste ............................ 665
Table 9-4: Overview of current waste management options (status quo)...................................... 666
Table 9-5: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for TetraBDE ............ 667
Table 9-6: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for PentaBDE ........... 668
Table 9-7: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for HexaBDE ............ 669
Table 9-8: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for HeptaBDE .......... 670
Table 9-9: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for PFOS .................. 672
Table 9-10: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for PeCB .................. 673
Table 9-11: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for SCCP ................... 674
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xiv
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 9-12: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for HBCD.................. 675
Table 9-13: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for PCP .................... 676
Table 9-14: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for HCBD.................. 677
Table 9-15: Overview of new status quo on waste amounts for specific LPCL for PCNs .................... 677
Table 9-16: Summary overview of capacity needs in incineration/energy recovery at LPCL in
the dimension of ppm ..................................................................................................... 678
Table 9-17: Summary overview of PeCB and PCNs containing waste on capacity needs in
incineration and landfilling at LPCL in the dimension of ppb. ........................................ 679
Table 9-18: Overview of affected waste amounts for other treatment by setting the LPCL. ........... 679
Table 9-19: Capacity of treatment facilities in 2004 and 2006 in EU 27 (source: EUROSTAT) .......... 680
Table 9-20: Correlation of capacity needs and available capacity..................................................... 680
Table 9-21: Costs for relevant waste management option in the UK ............................................... 685
Table 9-22: Costs for relevant waste management options .............................................................. 686
Table 9-23: Waste requiring additional incineration or other treatment at set LPCL (t/y) and
related cost estimates .................................................................................................... 686
Table 9-24: Significant LPCL values for criterion D ............................................................................ 689
Table 9-25: Relevant European legislation (PBDEs) ........................................................................... 690
Table 9-26: Relevant national legislation (PBDEs) ............................................................................. 691
Table 9-27: Relevant European legislation (PFOS) ............................................................................. 691
Table 9-28: Relevant national legislation (PFOS) ............................................................................... 691
Table 9-29: Relevant European legislation (PeCB) ............................................................................. 693
Table 9-30: Relevant national legislation (PeCB) ............................................................................... 693
Table 9-31: Relevant European legislation (SCCP) ............................................................................. 693
Table 9-32: Relevant national legislation (SCCP) ............................................................................... 693
Table 9-33: Relevant European legislation (HBCD) ............................................................................ 693
Table 9-34: Relevant European legislation (PCP) ............................................................................... 694
Table 9-35: Relevant national legislation (PCP) ................................................................................. 694
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xv
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 9-36: Relevant national legislation (HCBD) .............................................................................. 694
Table 9-37: Overview of most relevant exposure pathways of new and candidate POP
substances ...................................................................................................................... 696
Table 9-38: Overview of most relevant information on occupational exposure ............................... 698
Table 9-39: Overview of occupational exposure and/or emission limit values (OEL) ....................... 699
Table 9-40: Overview of tolerable daily intake (TDI), estimated daily intakes and minimal risk
levels (MRL) for new POPs and candidate POPs ............................................................. 700
Table 9-41: Overview of lower limitations for LPCLs for new POPs .................................................. 708
Table 9-42: Overview of upper limitations for LPCLs for new POPs .................................................. 708
Table 9-43: Conclusions for LPCLs for new POPs based on results from upper and lower
limitation criteria ............................................................................................................ 709
Table 9-44: Quantity of waste considered as POP waste at different LPCL (TetraBDE) .................... 711
Table 9-45: Quantity of waste considered as POP waste at different LPCL (PentaBDE) ................... 711
Table 9-46: Quantity of waste considered as POP waste at different LPCL (HexaBDE) .................... 712
Table 9-47: Quantity of waste considered as POP waste at different LPCL (HeptaBDE) ................... 712
Table 9-48: Overview of preferred proposals (LPCL 1) and alternative transitional or restricted
proposals (LPCL 2) for LPCLs ........................................................................................... 728
Table 9-49: Recommendations for the surface sealing of landfills according to 1999/31/EC .......... 731
Table 9-50: Overview of target concentrations in surface water, effluent limit concentration,
lowest observed environmental concentration ............................................................. 732
Table 9-51: Examples for wastes that may exhibit concentrations above the proposed MPCL
limit ................................................................................................................................. 738
Table 9-52: Overview of relevant recycling activities, proposed measures and assessment of
corresponding impacts ................................................................................................... 744
Table 9-53: Compilation of limit values proposed in the interim report for PDBE congener
groups relevant for C-OctaBDE and of limit values theoretically derived from limit
values established under RoHS. ...................................................................................... 748
Table 9-54: Evaluation of the appropriateness of disposal and recovery operation according to
Annex V, part 1 of the POP regulation for the new and candidate POPs ....................... 760
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xvi
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Table 10-1: Overview of preferred proposals (LPCL 1) and alternative transitional or restricted
proposals (LPCL 2) for Low POP Concentration Limits (LPCLs) referred to in Article
7(4)(a) and to be specified in Annex IV of the POP Regulation. ..................................... 773
Table 10-2: Overview of preferred proposals (MPCL 1) and alternative transitional proposals
(MPCL 2) for Maximum POP Concentration Limits (MPCLs) to be specified in
Annex V, Parat 2 of the POP Regulation ......................................................................... 774
Table 10-3: Waste quantities concerned by the proposed LPCLs ..................................................... 774
Table 10-4: Impacts of the proposed limit values for PBDEs in terms of POP substance
quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,
possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the
elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 778
Table 10-5: Impacts of the proposed limit values for PFOS in terms of POP substance
quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,
possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the
elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 783
Table 10-6: Impacts of the proposed limit values for PeCB in terms of POP substance
quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,
possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the
elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 787
Table 10-7: Impacts of the proposed limit values for SCCP in terms of POP substance
quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,
possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the
elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 788
Table 10-8: Impacts of the proposed limit values for HBCD in terms of POP substance
quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,
possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the
elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 790
Table 10-9: Impacts of the proposed limit values for PCP in terms of POP substance quantities,
related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management, possible
effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the elimination
capacity (Reference year: 2010) ..................................................................................... 793
Table 10-10: Impacts of the proposed limit values for HCBD in terms of POP substance
quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,
possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the
elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 794
Table 10-11: Impacts of the proposed limit values for PCN in terms of POP substance
quantities, related waste quantities, costs for changes in waste management,
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xvii
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
possible effectiveness to eliminate the POP substance and impacts on the
elimination capacity (Reference year: 2010) .................................................................. 795
Table 10-12: Overview of relevant waste management activities, proposed measures and
assessment of corresponding impacts............................................................................ 796
Table 10-13: Impact of proposed LPCLs and related measures on current recycling activity ............. 798
Table 12-1: Overview of information submitted by stakeholders on commercial PentaBDE,
OctaBDE, PFOS, its salts and PFOSF ................................................................................ 819
Table 12-2: Overview of information submitted by stakeholders on PeCB ...................................... 823
Table 12-3: Overview of information submitted by stakeholders on candidate POPs ..................... 825
Table 12-4: Overview of information submitted from the European Parties to the Stockholm
Convention (Questionnaire SC 4/19, Part II, Section A and B) on commercial
PentaBDE and commercial OctaBDE............................................................................... 828
Table 12-5: Overview of information submitted from the European Parties to the Stockholm
Convention (Questionnaire SC 4/19, Part III, Section A and B) on Perfluorooctane
sulfonic acid (PFOS), its salts and perfluoroctane sulfonyl fluoride (PFOSF) .................. 831
Table 12-6: Overview of information submitted from the European Parties to the Stockholm
Convention (Questionnaire SC 4/19, Part IV) on PeCB and other chemicals listed in
Annex A at the fourth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties .................................. 833
Table 12-7: Physico-chemical and toxicological properties of POPs ................................................. 835
Table 12-8: Overview of number and capacity of treatment facilities in 2004 and 2006 at
country level (source: EUROSTAT) .................................................................................. 838
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xviii
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
List of Figures
Figure 5-1: General structure of the mass flow (macro dimension) * including recovery
operation R1 (Use principally as a fuel or other means to generate energy) .................. 61
Figure 5-2: Example for process specific differentiation of residues and emissions in the mass
flow (micro dimension) ..................................................................................................... 62
Figure 5-3: Overall mass flow from C-PentaBDE from sources to current disposal/recovery
operations in the EU ......................................................................................................... 72
Figure 5-4: Relative distribution of environment emissions from investigated sectors in the EU ..... 73
Figure 5-5: Relative distribution of discharge of C-PentaBDE to waste from investigated
sectors in the EU ............................................................................................................... 74
Figure 5-6: Relative importance of different waste treatment options for the C-PentaBDE flow
in the EU ............................................................................................................................ 75
Figure 5-7: Overall mass flow from C-OctaBDE from sources to current disposal/recovery
operations in the EU (*Scenario 2: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE plastic successfully
separated and incinerated, R1/D10) ................................................................................ 77
Figure 5-8: Relative importance of different waste treatment options for the C-OctaBDE flow
in the EU (*C-OctaBDE containing WEEE successfully separated and incinerated,
R1/D10) (*Scenario 2: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE plastic successfully separated
and incinerated, R1/D10) .................................................................................................. 79
Figure 5-9: Overall mass flow from PFOS from sources to current disposal/recovery
operations in the EU ......................................................................................................... 80
Figure 5-10: Contribution of the relevant sectors to the EU 27 to PFOS emissions to
environment and discharge to waste ............................................................................... 81
Figure 5-11: Relative distribution of PFOS emissions to the environment from investigated
sectors in EU 27 ................................................................................................................ 82
Figure 5-12: Relative distribution to PFOS waste from investigated sectors in EU 27 ......................... 82
Figure 5-13: Relative importance of different waste treatment options and uses in products
with respect to the PFOS mass flow in EU 27 ................................................................... 84
Figure 5-14: Overview of PeCB substance flow .................................................................................... 88
Figure 5-15: Contribution of the relevant sectors to the EU 27 to PeCB emissions to
environment and discharge to waste ............................................................................... 89
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xix
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Figure 5-16: Relative distribution of PeCB emissions to the environment from investigated
sectors in EU 27 ................................................................................................................ 90
Figure 5-17: Relative PeCB distribution to waste from investigated sectors in EU 27 ......................... 90
Figure 5-18: Relative importance of different waste treatment options with respect to the
PeCB mass flow in EU 27 ................................................................................................... 92
Figure 5-19: Means and ranges of recent PeCB contamination in different waste types in EU 27 ...... 93
Figure 5-20: Overall mass flow for SCCPs from relevant sources to current disposal/recovery
operations in the EU 27. ................................................................................................... 95
Figure 5-21: Relative distribution of environment emissions from investigated sectors in the EU
27 ...................................................................................................................................... 96
Figure 5-22: Relative distribution of discharge of SCCP to waste from investigated sectors in
the EU 27 ........................................................................................................................... 97
Figure 5-23: Relative importance of different waste treatment options for the SCCP flow in the
EU ...................................................................................................................................... 98
Figure 5-24: Overall substance flow of HBCD from relevant sources to current
disposal/recovery operations in the EU (*Scenario 2: HBCD containing waste not
separated from other plastic C&D waste or MSW) ........................................................ 100
Figure 5-25: Relative distribution of environment emissions from investigated sectors in the EU ... 101
Figure 5-26: Relative distribution of discharge of HBCD to waste from investigated sectors in
the EU.............................................................................................................................. 102
Figure 5-27: Contribution of the relevant sectors to the HBCD discharge to waste in the EU
(~2030 and ~2040) .......................................................................................................... 102
Figure 5-28: Relative importance of different waste treatment options for the HBCD flow in the
EU (*In case the HBCD containing waste is not separated)............................................ 104
Figure 5-29: Estimated average (ea) and ranges of HBCD contamination in relevant wastes ........... 105
Figure 5-30: Overall mass flow from PCP from sources to current disposal/recovery operations
in the EU .......................................................................................................................... 107
Figure 5-31: Contribution of the relevant sectors to the EU 27 to PCP emissions to environment
and discharge to waste ................................................................................................... 108
Figure 5-32: Relative importance of different waste treatment options with respect to the
PFOS mass flow in EU 27 ................................................................................................. 109
Figure 5-33: Overview of PCN substance flow .................................................................................... 113
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xx
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Figure 5-34: Contribution of the relevant sectors to the EU 27 to PCN emissions to
environment and discharge to waste ............................................................................. 114
Figure 5-35: Relative distribution of PCN emissions to the environment from investigated
sectors in EU 27 .............................................................................................................. 115
Figure 5-36: Relative PCN distribution to waste from investigated sectors in EU 27 ......................... 115
Figure 5-37: Relative importance of different waste treatment options with respect to the PCN
mass flow in EU 27 .......................................................................................................... 117
Figure 5-38: Means and ranges of recent H contamination in different waste types in EU 27 .......... 118
Figure 6-1: Comparison of congener patterns obtained from the sediment sample collected
5m downstream of the effluent discharge, and the effluent sample collected at
the discharge to the river [Eljarrat et al. 2007] .............................................................. 125
Figure 6-2: Overview of the amounts of C-PentaBDE used in the EU ............................................... 130
Figure 6-3: Overview of the amounts of C-PentaBDE imported in finished articles ......................... 131
Figure 6-4: Estimated consumption of C-PentaBDE in Europe [Prevedouros et al. 2004a] ............. 132
Figure 6-5: Overview of historic uses of C-PentaBDE and their relevance [inspired by SFT
2009] ............................................................................................................................... 135
Figure 6-6: Overview of the substance flow contributing to the sources of C-PentaBDE in the
EU .................................................................................................................................... 137
Figure 6-7: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products (automotive industry) ......................... 140
Figure 6-8: Number of cars and year of the first registration of cars, which were scrapped
within the German scrapping scheme in 2009 ............................................................... 142
Figure 6-9: Estimated accumulated amount of C-PentaBDE (automotive applications) .................. 143
Figure 6-10: ELV arising and treatment in the EU [GHK 2006] ........................................................... 144
Figure 6-11: C-PentaBDE flow in automotive applications ................................................................. 148
Figure 6-12: Waste flow for C-PentaBDE automotive applications .................................................... 149
Figure 6-13: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products (upholstery) ......................................... 150
Figure 6-14: Estimated accumulated amount of C-PentaBDE in upholstery applications .................. 152
Figure 6-15: C-PentaBDE flow in upholstery applications .................................................................. 154
Figure 6-16: Waste flow for C-PentaBDE in upholstery applications .................................................. 154
Figure 6-17: Summary of main historic uses of C-OctaBDE ................................................................ 170
file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457158file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457158file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457159file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457159file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457160file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457164file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457166file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457169file://biprofs01/bipro/aktuelle%20Projekte/EU%20Framework%20Waste%20Implementation/7_Service%20request%20waste%20pops/Reports/05%20Final%20update/FR_POP_Waste_2010_110413.docx%23_Toc290457170
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xxi
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Figure 6-18: Overview of the substance flow contributing to the sources of C-OctaBDE in the
EU .................................................................................................................................... 171
Figure 6-19: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products (EEE) .................................................... 173
Figure 6-20: Estimated accumulated amount of C-OctaBDE in EEE ................................................... 178
Figure 6-21: C-OctaBDE flow (Scenario 1: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE treated together with
WEEE categories 3 and 4) ............................................................................................... 180
Figure 6-22: C-OctaBDE flow (*Scenario 2: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE successfully separated
and incinerated, R1/D10) ................................................................................................ 181
Figure 6-23: Waste flow for C-OctaBDE and relevant congener groups in WEEE plastics
(Scenario 1: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE plastics treated together with WEEE
plastics categories 3 and 4) ............................................................................................. 182
Figure 6-24: Waste flow for C-OctaBDE and relevant congener groups in WEEE plastics
(*Scenario 2: C-OctaBDE containing WEEE plastics successfully separated and
incinerated, R1/D10) ....................................................................................................... 182
Figure 6-25: Change in the use of PFOS in the semiconductor industry in the EU (annual
consumption of PFOS for the use in different applications from 2000 to 2010) ........... 195
Figure 6-26: Use of PFOS in the metal plating industry in Europe (estimation based on several
sources) ........................................................................................................................... 203
Figure 6-27: Substance flow PFOS from the sector of metal plating .................................................. 205
Figure 6-28: PFOS related waste flow related to the metal plating industry ..................................... 207
Figure 6-29: Illustration of the estimated use of PFOS in the photographic industry from 2000
to 2010 ............................................................................................................................ 213
Figure 6-30: Illustration of the PFOS flows from the photographic industry ...................................... 215
Figure 6-31: Substance flow PFOS from the photographic industry ................................................... 216
Figure 6-32: PFOS related waste flow from the photographic industry ............................................. 217
Figure 6-33: PFOS substance flow related to use in hydraulic fluid in the aviation industry ............. 221
Figure 6-34: Waste flow for hydraulic fluids for use in the aviation industry in EU 27 ...................... 221
Figure 6-35: Time trend of reduction of PFOS quantities stored in fire fighting foams from 2004
until 2012 in the EU ........................................................................................................ 224
Figure 6-36: Corrected time trend of reduction of PFOS quantities stored in fire fighting foams
from 2004 until 2012 in the EU ....................................................................................... 225
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xxii
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Figure 6-37: Sales volume of PFOS containing fire fighting foams in the Netherlands from one
company ......................................................................................................................... 227
Figure 6-38: Assessment of the PFOS flow related to use in fire fighting foams estimated for
2010 in EU 27 .................................................................................................................. 229
Figure 6-39: Waste flow for fire fighting foams in EU 27 .................................................................... 230
Figure 6-40: Overview of the leather production of different EU Member states
[Euroleather_2010] ......................................................................................................... 233
Figure 6-41: Reduction of PFOS contained in upholstery in households ............................................ 235
Figure 6-42: Substance flow of PFOS in the leather industry. ............................................................ 236
Figure 6-43: Material flow of PFOS in the leather industry ................................................................ 237
Figure 6-44: Input/Output overview of PFOS use for carpets............................................................ 238
Figure 6-45: Substance flow of PFOS in the leather industry ............................................................. 241
Figure 6-46: Material flow of PFOS in the carpet industry ................................................................. 241
Figure 6-47: PFOS relevant Input/Output overview of sewage sludge .............................................. 242
Figure 6-48: Substance flow of PFOS in sewage sludge ...................................................................... 245
Figure 6-49: Material flow of PFOS in sewage sludge ......................................................................... 246
Figure 6-50: Overview of PeCB releases to water and soil from facilities in Europe in 2008
[PRTR 2008] ..................................................................................................................... 262
Figure 6-51: Overview of possibly relevant sources of PeCB in Europe ............................................. 262
Figure 6-52: Overview of initial PeCB substance flow ........................................................................ 266
Figure 6-53: Relevant input and output from municipal solid waste incineration ............................. 269
Figure 6-54: Assessment of PeCB flow related to MSWI .................................................................... 274
Figure 6-55: Detailed waste flow for MSWI in EU 27 .......................................................................... 275
Figure 6-56: Relevant input and output of hazardous waste incineration and relevance of other
hazardous waste management options (values [EUROSTAT 2010]) .............................. 276
Figure 6-57: Assessment of the PeCB flow related to hazardous waste incineration ........................ 279
Figure 6-58: Detailed waste flow for HWI in EU 27 ............................................................................ 280
Figure 6-59: Relevant input and output of power production ........................................................... 281
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xxiii
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Figure 6-60: Assessment of the PeCB flow related to power production from coal and lignite ........ 285
Figure 6-61: Detailed waste flow for coal fired power plants in EU 27 in 2008 ................................. 286
Figure 6-62: Relevant input and output of waste water treatment ................................................... 287
Figure 6-63: Assessment of the PeCB flow related to sewage sludge ................................................ 290
Figure 6-64: Waste flow for sewage sludge in EU 27 .......................................................................... 291
Figure 6-65: Relevant input and output of domestic burning ............................................................ 292
Figure 6-66: Assessment of the PeCB flow related to domestic burning ........................................... 295
Figure 6-67: Detailed waste flow for domestic burning of wood, solid fossil fuels (coal and
derivates) and mixed wastes in EU 27 ............................................................................. 296
Figure 6-68: Total annual Sales of SCCP in the EU 1994-2009 [SCCP RPA 2010] (provided by
Eurochlor) ....................................................................................................................... 308
Figure 6-69: Trend of the use of SCCP in the rubber industry within the EU 27 ................................ 313
Figure 6-70: Input/Output of SCCP in the rubber industry ................................................................. 313
Figure 6-71: Substance flow of SCCP in the rubber industry .............................................................. 318
Figure 6-72: Material flow of SCCP in the rubber industry ................................................................. 319
Figure 6-73: Annual consumption of SCCP for sealant and adhesives from 1994 to 2010. ............... 321
Figure 6-74: Input/Output of SCCP in the rubber industry ................................................................. 322
Figure 6-75: Substance flow of SCCP in sealants and adhesives ......................................................... 325
Figure 6-76: Material flow of SCCP in sealants and adhesives ........................................................... 325
Figure 6-77: Annual consumption of SCCP for paint and varnishes. .................................................. 326
Figure 6-78: Input/Output of SCCP in the rubber industry ................................................................. 328
Figure 6-79: Substance flow of SCCP paint ......................................................................................... 331
Figure 6-80: Material flow of SCCP in paints and varnishes ............................................................... 333
Figure 6-81: Used amount of SCCP in the textile industry .................................................................. 335
Figure 6-82: Material flow of SCCP in the plastic industry .................................................................. 335
Figure 6-83: Material flow of SCCP in the plastic industry .................................................................. 338
Figure 6-84: Material flow of SCCP in the plastic industry .................................................................. 339
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xxiv
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
Figure 6-85: SCCP relevant Input/Output overview of sewage sludge ............................................... 341
Figure 6-86: Substance flow of SCCP in sewage sludge ...................................................................... 343
Figure 6-87: Material flow of SCCP in sewage sludge ......................................................................... 344
Figure 6-88: Use of SCCP in the EU leather industry. .......................................................................... 346
Figure 6-89: Input/Output flow of SCCP in the leather industry. ........................................................ 346
Figure 6-90: Substance flow of SCCP used in the leather industry ..................................................... 349
Figure 6-91: Waste flow of SCCP containing products from the leather industry .............................. 350
Figure 6-92: Estimation of the consumption of HBCD in tonnes in Europe since the late
1980ies until 2010 (estimation based on data from [ECB 2008], [Nordic COM
2007], [IOM 2008], [PS foam 2011]) ............................................................................... 367
Figure 6-93: Modelled consumption of HBCD in Europe and comparison with data provided by
BSEF/CEFIC and the estimate in the EU risk draft [Morf 2007] ...................................... 367
Figure 6-94: Relevance of product types with respect to the HBCD consumption for the year
2009 (Figures indicate the HBCD content)...................................................................... 374
Figure 6-95: Relevance of product types with respect to the HBCD consumption for the year
2003 (Figures indicate the HBCD content)...................................................................... 375
Figure 6-96: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products (HBCD treated EPS) ............................. 377
Figure 6-97: Estimated annual quantity of HBCD in EPS waste from construction and
demolition that will be disposed of until 2060 (calculation based on the
consumption figures provided in Table 6-70; lifetime 50 +/- 25 years; 1% cut offs
becoming waste at the construction site taken into account) ....................................... 383
Figure 6-98: HBCD substance flow EPS products for construction (Scenario 1: HBCD containing
EPS waste separated) ...................................................................................................... 385
Figure 6-99: HBCD substance flow EPS products for construction (Scenario 2: HBCD containing
EPS waste not separated but treated with the plastic fraction of C&D waste) .............. 386
Figure 6-100: EPS waste flow (Scenario 1: HBCD containing EPS waste separated) ....................... 387
Figure 6-101: EPS waste flow (Scenario 2: HBCD containing EPS waste not separated but
treated with the plastic fraction of C&D waste) ............................................................. 387
Figure 6-102: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products in XPS manufacturing ..................... 390
Figure 6-103: Estimated annual quantity of HBCD in XPS waste from construction that will be
disposed of until 2060 (calculation based on the consumption figures provided
No ENV.G.4/FRA/2007/0066 xxv
European Commission ESWI Final Report Study on waste related issues of newly listed POPs and candidate POPs
inTable 6-70; lifetime 50 +/- 25 years; 1% cut offs becoming waste at the
construction site taken into account) ............................................................................. 392
Figure 6-104: HBCD substance flow XPS products for construction (Scenario 1: HBCD
containing XPS waste separated) .................................................................................... 393
Figure 6-105: HBCD substance flow XPS products for construction (Scenario 2: HBCD
containing XPS waste not separated but treated with the plastic fraction from
C&D waste) ..................................................................................................................... 394
Figure 6-106: HBCD treated XPS waste flow (Scenario 1: XPS waste separated) ............................ 395
Figure 6-107: XPS waste flow (Scenario 2: XPS waste not separated)............................................. 395
Figure 6-108: Relevant process inputs/outputs and products (EPS/XPS outside the
construction sector) ........................................................................................................ 397
Figure 6-109: Estimated annual quantity of HBCD in EPS/XPS waste from non-construction
uses that will be disposed of until around 2040 (calculation