Upload
bui-hong-mai
View
230
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
1/60
April 2015
April 2015
Session 1
Business Operations and Logistics:
Introduction to operations managementOperations strategy
Assistant Professor Sakda Siriphattrasophon, Ph.D.
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
2/60
1 - 2 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Activity - Session 1
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
3/60
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
4/60
1 - 4 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline What Is Operations Management?
Organizing to Produce Goods and Services
Why Study OM?
The Heritage of Operations Management
Operations for Goods and Services
The Productivity Challenge
Productivity Measurement Productivity Variables
Productivity and the Service Sector
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
5/60
1 - 5 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Outline - Continued Strategy and Strategic Process
Strategies for Competitive Advantage
OMs Contribution to Strategy
New Challenges in OperationsManagement
Ethics, Social Responsibility, and
Sustainability
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
6/60
Learning ObjectivesWhen you complete this session
you should be able to:
1. Define operations management
2. Understand and explain OMs ten strategic
decisions3. Explain the distinction between goods and
services
4. Explain the difference between productionand productivity
5. Identify and explain three strategicapproaches to competitive advantage
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
7/60
1 - 7 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
What Is OperationsManagement?
Production is the creation ofgoods and services
Operations management (OM) isthe set of activities that createvalue in the form of goods and
services by transforming inputsinto outputs
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
8/60
1 - 8 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Organizing to ProduceGoods and Services
Essential functions:
1. Marketing generates demand
2. Production/operations createsthe product
3. Finance/accounting tracks how
well the organization is doing, paysbills, collects the money
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
9/60
1 - 9 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Organizational ChartsFigure 1.1
strong room
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
10/60
1 - 10 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Organizational ChartsFigure 1.1
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
11/60
1 - 11 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Organizational ChartsFigure 1.1
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
12/60
1 - 12 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
The Supply ChainA global network of organizations and
activities that supply a firm with goods andservices
Members of the supply chain collaborate
to achieve high levels of customersatisfaction, efficiency and competitiveadvantage. Figure 1.2
Farmer Syrup Bottler Distributor Retailer producer
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
13/60
1 - 13 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Why Study OM?1. OM is one of three major functions of any
organization, we want to study how peopleorganize themselves for productiveenterprise
2. We want (and need) to know how goodsand services are produced
3. We want to understand what operations
managers do4. OM is such a costly part of an organization
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
14/60
1 - 14 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Options for IncreasingContribution
TABLE 1.1
MARKETINGOPTION
FINANCE/ACCOUNTING
OPTION OM OPTION
CURRENT
INCREASESALES
REVENUE 50%
REDUCEFINANCE
COSTS 50%
REDUCEPRODUCTIONCOSTS 20%
Sales $100,000 $150,000 $100,000 $100,000
Cost of goods 80,000 120,000 80,000 64,000
Gross margin 20,000 30,000 20,000 36,000
Finance costs 6,000 6,000 3,000 6,000
Subtotal 14,000 24,000 17,000 30,000Taxes at 25% 3,500 6,000 4,200 7,500
Contribution $ 10,500 $ 18,000 $ 12,750 $ 22,500
Increases71%
Increases21%
Increases114%
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
15/60
1 - 15 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Ten Strategic OM DecisionsTABLE1.2
DECISION CHAPTER(S)
1.
Designof
goods
and
services 5,
Supplement
5
2. Managingquality 6,Supplement6
3. Processandcapacity design 7,Supplement7
4. Locationstrategy 8
5. Layoutstrategy 9
6. Humanresourcesand jobdesign 10
7. Supplychainmanagement 11,Supplement11
8.
Inventory management 12,
14,
169. Scheduling 13,15
10.Maintenance 17
What Operations Managers Do
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
16/60
1 - 16 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
The Strategic Decisions1. Design of goods and services
What good or service should we offer?
How should we design these productsand services?
2. Managing quality (session 5)
How do we define quality?
Who is responsible for quality?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
17/60
1 - 17 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
The Strategic Decisions3. Process and capacity design (S.2-4)
What process and what capacity will theseproducts require?
What equipment and technology is necessary
for these processes?4. Location strategy
Where should we put the facility?
On what criteria should we base the locationdecision?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
18/60
1 - 18 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
The Strategic Decisions5. Layout strategy
How should we arrange the facility and materialflow?
How large must the facility be to meet our plan?
6. Human resources and job design How do we provide a reasonable work
environment?
How much can we expect our employees to
produce?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
19/60
1 - 19 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
The Strategic Decisions7. Supply-chain management (Session 7)
Should we make or buy this component?
Who are our suppliers and who can integrate intoour e-commerce program?
8. Inventory management (Session 6) How much inventory of each item should we have?
When do we re-order?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
20/60
1 - 20 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
The Strategic Decisions9. Scheduling (Session 9)
Are we better off keeping people on the payrollduring slowdowns?
Which jobs do we perform next?
10. Maintenance Who is responsible for maintenance?
When do we do maintenance?
Table 1.2 (cont.)
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
21/60
Significant Events in OM
Figure 1.4
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
22/60
1 - 22 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Operations forGoods and Services
Manufacturers produce tangible product,services often intangible
Operations activities often very similar Distinction not always clear
Few pure services
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
23/60
1 - 23 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Characteristics of Goods Tangible product
Consistent productdefinition
Production usually
separate fromconsumption
Can be inventoried
Low customerinteraction
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
24/60
1 - 24 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Characteristics of Service Intangible product
Produced and consumedat same time
Often unique
High customer interaction Inconsistent product
definition
Often knowledge-based
Frequently dispersed
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
25/60
Goods and Services
Automobile
Computer
Installed carpetingFast-food meal
Restaurant meal/auto repair
Hospital care
Advertising agency/investment management
Consulting service/teaching
Counseling
Percent of Product that is a Good Percent of Product that is a Service
100% 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100%| | | | | | | | |
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
26/60
1 - 26 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Differences Between Goods and
ServicesTABLE1.3
CHARACTERISTICSOFSERVICES CHARACTERISTICSOFGOODS
Intangible:Rideinanairlineseat Tangible:Theseatitself
Producedandconsumedsimultaneously:Beautysalon
producesahaircutthatisconsumedasitisproduced
Productcanusuallybekeptininventory(beautycare
products)
Unique:Yourinvestmentsandmedicalcareareunique Similarproductsproduced(iPods)
Highcustomerinteraction:Oftenwhatthecustomeris
payingfor(consulting,education)
Limitedcustomerinvolvementinproduction
Inconsistentproductdefinition:AutoInsurance
changeswithageandtypeofcar
Productstandardized(iPhone)
Oftenknowledgebased:Legal,education,andmedical
servicesarehardtoautomate
Standardtangibleproducttendstomakeautomation
feasible
Servicesdispersed:Servicemayoccuratretailstore,
localoffice,housecall,orviainternet.
Producttypicallyproducedatafixedfacility
Qualitymaybehardtoevaluate:Consulting,
education,andmedicalservices
Manyaspectsofqualityfortangibleproductsareeasy
toevaluate(strengthofabolt)
Resellingisunusual:Musicalconcertormedicalcare Productoftenhassomeresidualvalue
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
27/60
1 - 27 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
U.S. Agriculture, Manufacturing, and Service Employment
Figure 1.5100
80
60
40
20
0
PercentofWorkforce
18001825
18501875
19001925
19501975
20002025 (est.)
| | | | | | | | |
Agriculture Services Manufacturing
Growth of Services
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
28/60
1 - 28 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Productivity ChallengeProductivity is the ratio of outputs (goods
and services) divided by the inputs(resources such as labor and capital)
The objective is to improve productivity!
Productivity is important because it determines ourstandard of living
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
29/60
1 - 29 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Feedback loop
Outputs
Goodsand
services
Transformation
The U.S. economic systemtransforms inputs to outputs atabout an annual 2.5% increase
in productivity per year.The productivity increase is the
result of a mix of (i) capital(38% of 2.5%), (ii) labor (10%
of 2.5%), and (iii)
management (52% of 2.5%).
The Economic SystemInputs
Labor,capital,
management
Figure 1.6
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
30/60
Improving Productivity atStarbucks
A team of 10 analystscontinually look for waysto shave time. Someimprovements:
Stop requiring signatureson credit card purchasesunder $25
Saved 8 secondsper transaction
Change the size of the icescoop
Saved 14 secondsper drink
New espresso machines Saved 12 seconds
per shot, , Syn. lower, reduce,
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
31/60
1 - 31 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Improving Productivity atStarbucks
A team of 10 analystscontinually look for waysto shave time. Someimprovements:
Stop requiring signatureson credit card purchasesunder $25
Saved 8 secondsper transaction
Change the size of the icescoop
Saved 14 secondsper drink
New espresso machines Saved 12 seconds
per shot
Operations improvements havehelped Starbucks increase yearlyrevenue per outlet by $250,000 to$1,000,000 in seven years.
Productivity has improved by 27%, orabout 4.5% per year.
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
32/60
1 - 32 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Measure of process improvement Represents output relative to input
Only through productivity increasescan our standard of living improve
Productivity Measurement
Productivity =Units produced
Input used
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
33/60
1 - 33 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Productivity Calculations
Productivity =Units produced
Labor-hours used
= = 4 units/labor-hour1,000
250
Labor Productivity
One resource input single-factor productivity
Example: if units produced = 1,000 and labor-hours used is 250, then:
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
34/60
1 - 34 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Multi-Factor ProductivityOutput
Labor + Material + Energy +Capital + Miscellaneous
Productivity =
Also known as total factor productivity Output and inputs are often expressed in
dollars
Multiple resource inputs multi-factor productivity
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
35/60
1 - 35 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Collins Title (Labor) Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
=Old labor
productivity
8 titles/day
32 labor-hrs
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
36/60
1 - 36 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
8 titles/day
32 labor-hrs=
Old laborproductivity = .25 titles/labor-hr
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
37/60
1 - 37 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
8 titles/day
32 labor-hrs=
Old laborproductivity
=New laborproductivity
= .25 titles/labor-hr
14 titles/day
32 labor-hrs
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
38/60
1 - 38 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
8 titles/day
32 labor-hrs=
Old laborproductivity = .25 titles/labor-hr
14 titles/day
32 labor-hrs=
New laborproductivity
= .4375 titles/labor-hr
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
39/60
1 - 39 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Collins Title (Multifactor) Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
=Old multifactor
productivity
8 titles/day
$640 + 400
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
40/60
1 - 40 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
8 titles/day
$640 + 400=
Old multifactorproductivity
= .0077 titles/dollar
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
41/60
1 - 41 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
8 titles/day
$640 + 400=
Old multifactorproductivity
=New multifactor
productivity
= .0077 titles/dollar
14 titles/day
$640 + 800
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
42/60
1 - 42 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Collins Title Productivity
Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day
Old System:
14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day
New System:
8 titles/day
$640 + 400
14 titles/day
$640 + 800
=Old multifactor
productivity
=New multifactor
productivity
= .0077 titles/dollar
= .0097 titles/dollar
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
43/60
1 - 43 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
ConclusionLabor Productivity:
Multifactor Productivity:
Labor productivity has increased from .25
to .4375. The change is (.4375-.25) /.25 = 0.75, or
75% increase in labor productivity.
Multifactor productivity has increased from.0077 to .0097.
The change is (.0097-..0077) /.0077 = 0.26or 26% increase in multifactor productivity.
The computerized system can improve the companys productivity. Which measure can provide a better solution of the increase? Why?
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
44/60
1 - 44 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Productivity and theService Sector
1. Typically labor intensive (counseling, teaching)2. Frequently focused on unique individual
attributes or desires (investment advice)
3. Often an intellectual task performed byprofessionals (medical diagnosis)
4. Often difficult to mechanize and automate
(haircut)
5. Often difficult to evaluate for quality(performance of a law firm)
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
45/60
1 - 45 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Strategy Action plan to
achieve mission Functional areas have
strategies
Strategies exploitopportunities andstrengths, neutralize
threats, and avoidweaknesses
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
46/60
1 - 46 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Strategic Process
Marketing Operations Finance/Accounting
Functional Area
Missions
OrganizationsMission
Functional areas have their own missions and strategies, which usually
are based on higher-level missions and strategies in the organization.
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
47/60
1 - 47 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Strategies for CompetitiveAdvantage
1. Differentiation better, or at leastdifferent
2. Cost leadership cheaper
3. Response more responsive
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
48/60
1 - 48 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Competing on Differentiation
Uniqueness can go beyond both thephysical characteristics and service
attributes to encompass everything thatimpacts customers perception of value
Walt Disney Magic Kingdom experience differentiation
Hard Rock Cafe dining experience
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
49/60
1 - 49 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Competing on Cost
Provide the maximum value as perceivedby customer. Does not imply low quality.
Southwest Airl ines secondaryairports, no frills service, efficientutilization of equipment
Walmart small overhead, shrinkage,and distribution costs => superstoresopen 24 hours
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
50/60
1 - 50 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Competing on Response Flexibility is matching market changes in
design innovation and volumes
A way of life at Hewlett-Packard
Reliability is meeting schedules
German machine industry Timeliness is quickness
in design, production,
and delivery Johnson Electric,
Pizza Hut
OMs Contribution to Strategy
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
51/60
1 - 51 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
OM s Contribution to Strategy
Product
Quality
Process
Location
Layout
Humanresource
Supply chain
Inventory
Scheduling
Maintenance
DIFFERENTIATION:Innovative design Safeskins innovative glovesBroad product line Fidelity Securitys mutual fundsAf ter-sales service Caterpillar s heavy equipment
serviceExperience Hard Rock Cafs diningexperience
COST LEADERSHIP:Low overhead Franz-Colruyts warehouse-type
storesEffective capacity Southwest Airlines
use aircraft utilization
Inventory Walmarts sophist icatedmanagement distribution system
RESPONSE:
Flexibility Hewlett-Packards response tovolatile world marketReliability FedExs absolutely, positively,
on timeQuickness Pizza Huts 5-minute guarantee
at lunchtimeFigure 2.4
10 Operations CompetitiveDecisions Strategy Example Advantage
Response(faster)
Costleadership
(cheaper)
Differentiation(better)
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
52/60
1 - 52 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
New Challenges in OM Global focus
Supply-chain partnering Sustainability
Rapid product development
Mass customization
Just-in-time performance
Empowered employees
N T d i OM
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
53/60
1 - 53 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
New Trends in OM
Local or
national focus
Low-cost, reliable worldwide
communication andtransportation networks
Global focus
Batch (large)shipments
Short product life cycles andcost of capital put pressure on
reducing inventory
Just-in-timeperformance
Low-bidpurchasing
Quality emphasis requiresthat suppliers be engaged inproduct improvement
Supply-chainpartners,EnterpriseResourcePlanning,e-commerce
Figure 1.6
Past Causes Future
N T d i OM
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
54/60
1 - 54 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
New Trends in OM
Lengthy
productdevelopment
Shorter life cycles, Internet,
rapid internationalcommunication, computer-aided design, andinternational collaboration
Rapid product
development,alliances,collaborativedesigns
Standardized
products
Affluence and worldwide
markets; increasingly flexibleproduction processes
Mass
customizationwith addedemphasis onquality
Jobspecialization Changing socioculturemilieu; increasingly aknowledge and informationsociety
Empoweredemployees,teams, andlean production
Figure 1.6
Past Causes Future
N T d i OM
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
55/60
1 - 55 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
New Trends in OM
Low-cost
focus
Environmental issues, ISO
14000, increasing disposalcosts
Sustainability:
environmentallysensitiveproduction, greenmanufacturing,recycled
materials,remanufacturing
Figure 1.6
Past Causes Future
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
56/60
1 - 56 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Ethics, Social Responsibility,and Sustainability
Challenges facing operations managers: Develop and produce safe, high-quality
green products Train, retrain, and motivate employees
in a safe workplace Honor stakeholder commitments
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
57/60
VDO Case Study Frito-Lay: OM in manufacturing
Hard Rock Cafe: OM in services
Identi fy how each of 10 OM strategy decisions is applied at
Frito-Lay and Hard Rock Caf. How are they different?
pp.59-60
Hard Rock Cafe:
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
58/60
1 - 58 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Hard Rock Cafe:
OM in services
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
59/60
1 - 59 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.
Suggested Reflective Report Select one business that you are familiar
with. Summarize the business operations.
Identify how each of 10 OM strategy
decisions is applied at selectedcompany.
750 words for each report.
pp.59-60
S ggested Gro p Case St d
7/21/2019 Session 1 Student
60/60
Suggested Group Case Study
1. Document current profile and operations in one selected organization
2. Detail OM activities
Carefully and in depth, tell how the operations activities are performed in the firm. You shouldexplain the operations activities and technology for the firm. Specifically, the various inputs,transformation processes, and several outputs must be identified.
3. Identify a problem
For each of the activities discussed in 2, identify at least one operating problem in the firm.
Document this problem. Describe the problem as you best understand it as which you want tosolve it or improve it.
4. Propose a solution with the analysis (before/after comparison)
Suggest one or more tentative solutions to the problem. Provide enough explanation that a readerwill gain a basic understanding of what you are proposing. Supporting with the relevant
literature of operation theories , concepts and models .
5. Prepare a written report with recommendations
Report your findings (2,500 words for each report).