37
Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Session 66-12 English Language Arts

Day 2Text Complexity - Common Core State

Standards

Page 2: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Day 2 – Session11:00 – 12:15

OUTCOMES

Participants will increase their knowledge of:1.the importance of text complexity2.how to rate text for complexity

2

Page 3: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

TEXT COMPLEXITY

3

Page 4: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Complex versus Simple…

Working with a partner:Compare the two texts on the following screen

and jot down:The characteristics of the complex text versus the simple text

How does this affect the information conveyed?Be ready to share

4

Page 5: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

One hot summer's day a famished fox was strolling through an orchard until he came to clusters of grapes just ripening on a trellised vine. "Just the thing to quench my thirst," quoth he. Drawing back a few paces, he took a run and a jump, and just missed the bunch. His mouth was watering and he could feel gnawing hunger pains. Again and again he tried after the tempting morsel, but at last had to give up.

Once a fox walked through the woods. He came upon a grape orchard. There he found beautiful grapes hanging from a high branch. “Boy those sure would be tasty,” he thought to himself. He backed up and took a running start and jumped. He did not get high enough.

5

Page 6: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.

We want every country in the world, whether it is our friend or our enemy, to know that we will do whatever is necessary to make sure that freedom survives in the United States and around the world.

Page 7: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

What is right with “simplified” text?

• Provides for scaffolding for ELL students, students with disabilities

• They can become a foundation for understanding complex text as long as students have the opportunity to read complex texts as well.

• Gradated Text Collection – a collection of texts on a topic that advance in degrees of complexity. Some students may read simpler texts first, then move on to complex text (a form of instructional support).

7

Page 8: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

What’s wrong with the simplifiedtext approach?

• Simplified usually means limited, restricted, and thin in meaning.

• Academic vocabulary can only be learned from complex texts––by noticing how it works in texts, engaging with, thinking about, and discussing their more complex meanings with others.

• Mature language skills needed for success in school and life can only be gained by working with demanding materials.

• No evidence that struggling readers—especially at middle and high school--catch up by gradually increasing the complexity of simpler texts.

8

Page 9: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Gradated Texts

Article: Breathing and Its True Role in Our Life, Health and Longevity

A collection of texts that increase in difficulty from simple to moderate to complex, around a common topic.

9

Page 10: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

WHY TEXT COMPLEXITYMATTERS

10

Page 11: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Text Complexity - ACT Study

• Purpose: Determine what distinguished the reading performance of students likely to succeed in college and not.

• Process:• Set benchmark score on the reading test shown

to be predictive of success in college (“21” on ACT composite score). • Looked at results from a half million students.

11

Page 12: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Performance on the ACT Reading Test by Comprehension Level

12

Page 13: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Performance on the ACT Reading Test by Textual Element

(Averaged across Seven Forms)

13

Page 14: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Text Complexity Matters

Texts used in the ACT Reading Test reflect three degrees of complexity: uncomplicated, more challenging, and complex.

14

Page 15: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

15

Performance on the ACT Reading Test by Degree of Text Complexity

(Averaged across Seven Forms)

In this figure, performance on questions associated with uncomplicated and morechallenging texts both above and below the ACT College Readiness Benchmark forReading follows a pattern similar to those in the previous analyses. Improvement on each of the two kinds of questions is gradual and fairly uniform.

15

Page 16: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Text Complexity

Text complexity is defined by:

Qual

itativ

e

Qualitative measures – levels of meaning, structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands often best measured by an attentive human reader. Quantitative

Quantitative measures – readability and other scores of text complexity often best measured by computer software.

Reader and Task

Reader and Task considerations – background knowledge of reader, motivation, interests, and complexity generated by tasks assigned often best made by educators employing their professional judgment.

16

Page 17: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Recap of ACT Findings

Question type and level (main idea, word meanings, details) is NOT the chief differentiator between student scoring above and below the benchmark.

The degree of text complexity in the passages acted as the “sorters” within ACT. The findings held true for both males and females, all racial groups and was steady regardless of family income level.

What students could read, in terms of its complexity - rather than what they could do with what they read - is greatest predictor of success. FCAT has complex passages and highly cognitive demanding questions.

17

Page 18: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

The Common Core Standards' three equally important components of text complexity

Quantitative measures – readability and other scores of text complexity often best measured by computer software.

Qualitative measures – levels of meaning, structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands often best measured by an attentive human reader.

Reader and Task considerations – background knowledge of reader, motivation, interests, and complexity generated by tasks assigned often best made by educators employing their professional judgment.

18

Page 19: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Where do we find texts in the appropriate text complexity band?

Choose an excerpt of text from Appendix B as a starting place:

19

We could….

or…

Use available resources to determine the text complexity of other materials on our own.

Page 20: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Determining Text Complexity

A Four-step Process:

20

QuantitativeQual

itativ

e

Reader and Task

4. Recommend placement in the appropriate text complexity band.

3. Reflect upon the reader and task considerations.

2. Analyze the qualitative measures of the text.

1. Determine the quantitative measures of the text.

Page 21: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Step 1: Quantitative Measures

21

Measures such as:• Word length• Word frequency• Word difficulty• Sentence length• Text length• Text cohesion

Quantitative Measures

Page 22: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

22

Page 23: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Step 2: Qualitative Measures

Measures such as:• Structure• Language Demands

and Conventions• Knowledge Demands• Levels of

Meaning/Purpose

23

Page 24: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Common Core StandardsQualitative Features of Text Complexity

Structure

Simple ComplexExplicit ImplicitConventional UnconventionalEvents related in chronological order Events related out of

chronological order (chiefly literary texts)Traits of a common genre or subgenre Traits specific to a

particular discipline (chiefly informational texts)Simple graphics Sophisticated graphicsGraphics unnecessary or merely supplemental to

understanding the text Graphics essential to understanding the text and may provide information not elsewhere provided

24

Page 25: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Common Core StandardsQualitative Features of Text Complexity

Language Demands: Conventionality and ClarityLiteral Figurative or ironicClear Ambiguous or purposefully misleadingContemporary, familiar Archaic or otherwise unfamiliarConversational General Academic and domain specificLight vocabulary load: few unfamiliar or academic words

Many words unfamiliar and high academic vocabulary presentSentence structure straightforward Complex and varied

sentence structuresThough vocabulary can be measured by quantifiable means, it

is still a feature for careful consideration when selecting texts Though sentence length is measured by quantifiable means,

sentence complexity is still a feature for careful consideration when selecting texts

25

Page 26: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Knowledge Demands: Life Experience • Simple theme Complex or sophisticated themes• Single theme Multiple themes• Common everyday experiences or clearly fantastical situations

Experiences distinctly different from one’s own• Single perspective Multiple perspectives• Perspective(s) like one’s own Perspective(s) unlike or in

opposition to one’s own• Everyday knowledge Cultural and literary knowledge• Few allusions to other texts Many allusions to other texts • Low intertextuality (few or no references to other texts) High intertextuality (many references or citations to other texts)

26

Common Core StandardsQualitative Features of Text Complexity

Page 27: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Common Core StandardsQualitative Features of Text Complexity

Levels of Meaning (chiefly literary texts) orpurpose (chiefly informational texts)

• Single level of meaning Multiple levels of meaning

• Explicitly stated purpose Implicit purpose, may be hidden or obscure

27

Page 28: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Common Core StandardsQualitative Features of Text Complexity

Structure

Simple ComplexExplicit ImplicitConventional UnconventionalEvents related in chronological order Events related out of

chronological order (chiefly literary texts)Traits of a common genre or subgenre Traits specific to a

particular discipline (chiefly informational texts)Simple graphics Sophisticated graphicsGraphics unnecessary or merely supplemental to

understanding the text Graphics essential to understanding the text and may provide information not elsewhere provided

28

Page 29: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Step 2: Qualitative Measures

29

Qualitative factors are represented on a continua rather than discrete stages or levels, so numeric values are not associated with these rubric. Instead, six points along each continuum is identified: not suited to the band, early-mid grade level, mid-end grade level, early-mid grade level, mid-end grade level, not suited to band.

Page 30: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Step 3: Reader and Task

Considerations such as:•Motivation•Knowledge and experience•Purpose for reading•Complexity of task assigned regarding text•Complexity of questions asked regarding text

30

Page 31: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

What Complex Text Demands of Readers• A Willingness to Pause and Probe• Students must be patient as they read complex texts

and be willing to devote time to contemplation of the text

• The Capacity for Uninterrupted Thinking• Time devoted to the text and thinking about the text

exclusively - single-tasking rather than multi-tasking

• A Receptivity to Deep Thinking• Contemplation of the meaning of the text and not a

quick response voicing an opinion based on a shallow interpretation

(Mark Bauerlein, 2011)

31

Page 32: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Shorter, Challenging Texts • The study of short texts is useful to enable students at a

wide range of reading levels to participate in the close analysis of more demanding text.

• Place a high priority on the close, sustained reading of complex text. Such reading emphasizes the particular over the general and strives to focus on what lies within the four corners of the text.

• Close reading often requires compact, short, self-contained texts that students can read and re-read deliberately and slowly to probe and ponder the meanings of individual words, the order in which sentences unfold, and the development of ideas over the course of the text.

32

Page 33: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Words We Live by: Your Annotated Guide to the Constitution

• Work with a partner:• One partner should read aloud the first two

paragraphs and the second should read aloud the second two paragraphs

• Read the annotation of the structure of this text. Highlight the words not, but, neither, nor in the passage. Discuss what is contrasted in each paragraph and jot it down in the margin.

33

Page 34: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Words We Live by: Your Annotated Guide to the Constitution

• Work with a partner:• Read the annotation of the language demands.

Using a different color, highlight the words construed, advocates, suffrage, citizenship and any other words that you think would need to be taught. Discuss with your partner how you might teach these words.

• Examine the sentences along with the punctuation. Discuss which sentences might be considered particularly complex. Underline these.

34

Page 35: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Words We Live by: Your Annotated Guide to the Constitution

• Work with a partner:• Read the annotation of the knowledge

demands and discuss it with your partner. Are there other concepts that students would need to have knowledge of in order to understand this text?

35

Page 36: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Words We Live by: Your Annotated Guide to the Constitution

• Work with a partner:• Read the annotation pertaining to Levels

of Meaning/Purpose. Discuss the meaning and purpose of this text with your partner summarize the meaning and purpose of this text at the bottom of the page. Be ready to share.

36

Page 37: Session 6 6-12 English Language Arts Day 2 Text Complexity - Common Core State Standards

Reflect

• Please take a moment to reflect on the instructional implications of text complexity. Discuss with your partner and be ready to share your thoughts.

37