39

Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority
Page 2: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

1

Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary

A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority in ‘ranking’ all settlements/clusters of settlements in a

sustainability matrix (a hierarchy); and then Use this sustainability matrix to allocate settlements/clusters of settlements to

a category. This category can then be used to give an initial indication of the level of growth that is appropriate for each settlement before constraints and characteristics are considered.

A number of categories are proposed as set out below and settlements assigned to each depending on their ‘score’ in the sustainability matrix: Category A – identified as the strategically significant towns in Cornwall, and

are the main employment and service centres; Category B – identified as market and coastal towns that are locally significant

and contain a good range of housing, employment, and community facilities and services;

Category C – identified as small towns and villages that meet local needs for some services and facilities and employment;

Category D – smaller settlements that perform an important role in their local areas, i.e. ‘rural service centres’;

Category E – those settlements that do not meet the criteria for category D but are considered important in their immediate local area and contain a primary school or general store;

Category F – those settlements that that do not meet the criteria for category E but contain a travel to work bus or rail service and either a general store or a meeting place.

A number of changes have been identified between the surveys of 2009 and 2012 and this has resulted in some settlements changing category. This is usually due to a) better information being provided on facilities in a settlement which often results in a settlement moving up a category, b) a gain in facilities if the settlement has moved up a category or c) the loss of facilities in a settlement if the settlement has moved down a category. A number of key messages and issues were drawn out from this element of the evidence base, and these are summarised below: Robust evidence on community facilities and services, appropriately weighted,

can be used in determining a settlement hierarchy that is based on functionality and not dependent on population size.

This evidence must be kept up to date and under regular review. Categories of settlements can be used to determine a level of growth

appropriate to individual or clusters of settlements, but cannot prescribe a set level for each settlement within a category as settlement characteristics and constraints also need to be considered.

This process describes each settlement as they are at this point in time – it does not take into account what they could become in the future – they could lose or gain services for many reasons that are outside of the control of spatial planning policy. Some settlements could acquire additional services if development is effectively planned.

Page 3: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

2

Purpose and Role of the Evidence Base This is one in a series of papers dealing with a specific evidence base project. Developing the evidence base is central to the preparation of Development Plan Documents (DPD) within the Cornwall Local Plan, and this evidence base underpins the generation and testing of options. Establishing an appropriate evidence base is central to developing a justifiable plan. The National Planning Policy Framework1 makes it clear that ‘each local planning authority should ensure that the Local Plan is based on adequate, up-to-date and relevant evidence about the economic, social and environmental characteristics and prospects of the area’. This document adds that at examination, an independent inspector will assess whether a plan is considered sound, and one of the key elements in testing soundness is that the plan can be justified. That is, ‘the plan should be the most appropriate strategy, when considered against the reasonable alternatives, based on proportionate evidence’. The first document to be produced will be the Cornwall Local Plan: Strategic Policies, which will provide a long-term spatial vision for the area, as well as an overall development strategy, indicating where future development should be directed. As part of this process, settlements in Cornwall will be analysed in terms of their current level of community facilities and hence their potential future ability to accommodate new housing, employment and associated infrastructure. This paper sets out how the evidence base relating to a settlement hierarchy was prepared and identifies how this can inform the issues that need to be addressed in the Cornwall Local Plan, and in particular which settlements are the most sustainable in terms of the level of facilities available. Other evidence base background papers and reports available in this series include: Community Facilities & Services Survey: 2012 Update (this paper describes the

methodology and evidence used to understand community facilities in settlements – and is directly related to this paper)

Population and Household Change in Cornwall Housing Growth & Distribution: Housing Growth Submission Version Housing Growth & Distribution: Housing Distribution Submission Version Planning for the role and future of smaller settlements in Cornwall.

Why should we Analyse Settlement? Analysing settlements will help plan for the future of places in Cornwall. Locating new development, whether for housing, employment or any other land use is perhaps the most difficult part of planning for the future. Urban change and the loss of green field land to new development will create debate and disagreement about the choices which must be made. It is certain that Cornwall must accommodate new housing and employment development, supported in terms of community infrastructure, to meet the needs of communities in the area now and in the future.

A key principle underpinning planning policy is the need to create, support and promote sustainable communities. One of the main dimensions of sustainability is to locate housing, employment and services closely together. In addition to reducing the need to travel (and consequently carbon emissions) this approach helps to promote the viability of local services and community facilities.

1 DCLG (2012) National Planning Policy Framework - http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/nppf

Page 4: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

3

Why do we need a Hierarchy of Settlements? A hierarchy of settlements will help determine the level of growth that will be allocated across Cornwall. This paper outlines how a hierarchy has been reached. The proposed hierarchy is based on the number of key facilities and services available in settlements, as well as information on employment and travel to work. This is in keeping with the ‘functional’ approach to planning whereby it is the role and function of a settlement that will determine its position in a hierarchy and not just its population size. Many smaller settlements in Cornwall in terms of their population contain more services and facilities than would be expected and provide a vital role in their local areas. Camelford is a good example of this – it has a relatively small population of about 2,500 but has a range of facilities and services that are more likely to be found in larger market towns.

Why do we need Settlement Categories? Categorising settlements will help determine the level of growth that will be allocated across Cornwall. This paper outlines a range of categories that can be used to determine how much growth settlements in Cornwall could accommodate based on their position in the hierarchy.

Settlements in Cornwall There are many hundreds of settlements in Cornwall, ranging from those that are strategically significant such as Truro, through small towns and local centres to the smallest of villages and hamlets. There is no formal definition of what a small settlement is in planning terms, so it is not possible to give an exact number of settlements for Cornwall. The original 2009 community facilities and services survey looked at some 330 settlements that were identified in the ex District Local Plans. We know that many of Cornwall's towns and villages are probably well-placed to meet the challenges of the next few decades because they are already relatively self-sustaining and contain strong communities. Truro, Camborne/Pool/Illogan/Redruth, Falmouth/Penryn, Penzance/Newlyn, St Austell, Newquay, and Bodmin (settlement category2 A) are regarded as of strategic importance in Cornwall, and contain a wide range of community facilities and services that serve their own and surrounding areas populations. Other important towns (settlement category B) are identified as Bude/Stratton/Flexbury/Poughill, Hayle, Helston, Launceston, Liskeard, Saltash, St Ives/Carbis Bay and Wadebridge. We are particularly interested in 2012 in what has happened in the smaller towns and larger villages. Settlement categories A and B had been assigned to the main towns in Cornwall in 20093, and although facilities and services may have been lost in these locations, it is unlikely that any changes will impact on the overall sustainability of these types of settlements. However, the loss of just one facility in a smaller settlement can have a significant impact on its sustainability. Therefore the 2012 Community Facilities & Services Survey4 concentrated on settlement categories C, D and E particularly, as it is these types of settlements that will probably need to 2 Cornwall Council (2011) Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories - http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=32790 3 Cornwall Council (2011) Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories - http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=32790 4 Cornwall Council (2012) Community Facilities & Services Survey: 2012 Update - http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=32813

Page 5: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

4

accommodate some growth – and it is important that we have up to date information on their current sustainability. Development in settlements that fall into categories ‘F’ and ‘Other’ will be allowed only where it can be shown that it meets a local need for homes and/or employment space.

Relevant Policy Context The Government has set a clear policy agenda that in the future communities need to be sustainable, and the National Planning Policy Framework5 acknowledges that the ‘purpose of the planning system is to contribute to the achievement of sustainable development’. Being sustainable also means living within environmental limits, the most obvious of which is the need to limit greenhouse gas emissions. This means that in future we have to plan for communities which use less energy, need to use their cars less, and can cope with the impacts of climate change, whilst maintaining a good quality of life. The Cornwall Local Plan aims to do this by encouraging a close proximity of housing, jobs and services, therefore reducing the need to travel, especially by private car. These themes are at the core of the Sustainable Community Strategy for Cornwall. The National Planning Policy Framework6 is also clear that to ‘promote a strong rural economy, local and neighbourhood plans should…promote the retention and development of local services and community facilities in villages, such as local shops, meeting places, sports venues, cultural buildings, public houses and places of worship.’

Methodology: Hierarchy The Cornwall Local Plan will shape and direct Cornwall’s development up to 2030, and will be based on an assessment of the functional relationships between places. This functional approach, which is based on how people interact with businesses, services and facilities, requires an in-depth assessment of where people live, work, go to school, shop, bank and use leisure facilities. Information was collated for settlements from a range of sources on key facilities and services – see the evidence base background paper on ‘Community Facilities & Services Survey’7 and ‘Community Facilities & Services Survey: 2012 Update’8 for more information. The services and facilities chosen for this purpose are taken from the above list, but it was considered sensible to ‘weight’ those that are considered necessary to meet residents’ day to day needs higher than those that are ‘nice to have but not essential’. Three different levels of ‘scoring’ were identified in order that those services and facilities that are essential to everyday life are scored higher than those that are used less frequently: High – services and facilities that people need to use on a regular basis that are

essential to everyday life and which a sustainable settlement should contain: supermarket/food store, primary school, doctors’ surgery, good broadband

5 DCLG (2012) National Planning Policy Framework - http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/nppf 6 DCLG (2012) National Planning Policy Framework - http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/nppf 7 Cornwall Council (2011) Community Facilities & Services Survey - http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=32790 8 Cornwall Council (2012) Community Facilities & Service Survey: 2012 Update - http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=32813

Page 6: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

5

connection, travel to work bus/rail service, and a high work self containment (i.e. the proportion of the resident population employed locally).

Medium – services and facilities that people would only expect to be available in larger settlements or those that are not needed on a day to day basis: secondary school, bank/building society, post office, pre-school provision, chemist/pharmacy, pub/social club, petrol filling station, community hall, leisure centre/swimming pool, formal sports area/playing pitch, children’s equipped play area.

Low – these are services and facilities that are either so strategic that people would expect to travel a considerable distance to access them or that they are ‘nice to have’ but not essential – some of these services however may be very important in settlements with few other facilities: hospital, permanent library, mobile library, place of worship, other bus/rail service (not travel to work).

Weighting is also used in relation to facilities if: There is more than one unit of a key facility in a settlement - additional facilities

would score but not as highly as the first one counted – e.g. the first of a facility could score 4 but each additional facility of the same type would score 2.

Some facilities are full time and some part time and scores would be allocated to reflect this – e.g. a full time doctors’ surgery could score 4 and a part time surgery could score 2.

Some facilities are combined with others and scores should reflect this – e.g. post offices and general stores are often combined – individually they would score 4 each but the score would be reduced to reflect the combination and would score 2 each.

See appendix 1 for a table on how facilities and services score in the sustainability analysis.

Using the above methodology a comprehensive settlement sustainability analysis was carried out to identify where each settlement/cluster of settlements would ‘score’ in the hierarchy. See appendix 2 for this ‘sustainability matrix’. Facilities and services in settlements are subject to change over time, and while every effort has been made to ensure the data is up to date, there may need to be some adjustment made in the future. The ‘Community Facilities & Services Survey’ evidence base papers and related ‘Settlement Profiles’9 contain a list of the facilities and services available in each settlement at a specific point in time.

Methodology: Categories There are a huge number of settlements in Cornwall of varying sizes and functionality. It was considered sensible to use a scoring system to determine the functionality of a settlement (rather than its size in terms of population) and group similar settlements into the same category. The settlements within each proposed category are listed by their score so that it is easy to see which settlements are on the ‘cusp’ between categories.

Category A: These are identified as the strategically significant towns in Cornwall, and are the main employment and service centres for the County. In the sustainability matrix in Appendix 2, category A settlements are those that score more than 190 points. Category A settlements are: 9 Cornwall Council (2012) Settlement Profiles - http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=24898

Page 7: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

6

A Category Settlements

Camborne with Pool, Illogan and Redruth;

Falmouth with Penryn;

Penzance;

St Austell;

Truro with Threemilestone;

Newquay;

Bodmin

Category B: These are identified as market and coastal towns that are locally significant and contain a good range of housing, employment, and community facilities and services. In the sustainability matrix in Appendix 2, category B settlements are those that score 120 points or more but less than 191. Category B settlements are:

B Category Settlements

Launceston;

Bude with Stratton, Flexbury and Poughill;

Helston;

St Ives with Carbis Bay;

Saltash

Hayle;

Liskeard;

Wadebridge.

Category C: These are identified as small towns and villages that meet local needs for some services and facilities. In the sustainability matrix in Appendix 2, category C settlements are those that score 50 points or more but less than 120. Category C settlements are:

C Category Settlements

Torpoint;

St Blazey/Par;

Perranporth;

St Just;

St Agnes;

Indian Queens with St Columb Road & Fraddon;

Fowey;

Roche;

St Stephen;

Porthleven;

Tintagel;

Looe;

Padstow;

Callington;

Camelford;

Lostwithiel;

Mullion;

St Columb Major;

Newlyn;

Mevagissey;

Marazion;

Gunnislake;

Page 8: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

7

St Dennis;

Rock with Tredrizzick;

Delabole;

Kingsand with Cawsand;

Constantine;

St Merryn with Shop;

St Breward;

Lanner;

Pendeen;

Tregony.

Kilkhampton;

St Day;

Mount Hawke;

Boscastle;

Gerrans with Portscatho;

Stithians;

Heamoor;

Mawnan Smith;

Mylor;

Category D: There are smaller settlements that perform an important role in their local areas, i.e. ‘rural service centres’. In the sustainability matrix in Appendix 2, category D settlements are those that score 29 points or more but less than 50, and include both a primary school and a general store. Category D settlements are: D Category Settlements

St Erth;

Probus;

Bugle;

Menheniot;

Albaston with Drakewalls & St Anns Chapel;

Millbrook;

Crowlas with Lower Ludgvan;

Grampound;

Stoke Climsland with Venterdon;

Pensilva;

Sennen;

Pelynt;

Cubert;

Perranwell with Perranarworthal;

St Tudy;

Tywardreath;

Grampound Road;

Dobwalls;

St Eval;

Goonhavern;

St Mawgan;

Calstock;

Troon;

St Mawes;

Four Lanes;

St Newlyn East;

Gorran Haven with Churchtown;

Polperro;

St Keverne;

St Germans;

Lanivet with Lamorrick;

Port Isaac with Port Gaverne;

St Buryan;

Lizard;

St Teath;

Trispen;

Downderry;

Veryan;

Foxhole;

St Dominic;

Connor Downs;

Ponsanooth;

Luxulyan;

Goldsithney with St Hilary;

Page 9: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

8

Shortlanesend;

Mabe;

Polruan;

Leedstown;

Portreath;

Lewannick;

Altarnun with Five Lanes & Trewint;

Madron;

Whitstone;

St Mabyn;

Mawgan & Garras;

Ruan Minor;

Nanpean;

Flushing;

Porthcurno with St Levan;

St Neot;

Mousehole;

Duloe;

Manaccan;

Blisland;

Summercourt;

South Petherwin.

Other Settlements: There are many other settlements in Cornwall that fall outside of the above categories and some of these may perform an important role in their areas. There are those settlements that score as highly as those in category D but do not currently contain both a primary school and general store (although they may contain one of these facilities) such as Polperro, Chacewater, and St Kew Highway. There are those settlements that score slightly lower in the sustainability matrix but contain a primary school or general store such as Egloskerry, Newtown St Martin, and Widegates. We will need to consider what is the best way to deal with these settlements and may want to introduce a category E and a category F. Category E: In the sustainability matrix in Appendix 2, category E settlements are those that score 29 points or more but less than 50, and include either a primary school or a general store, and those settlements that score less than 29 but do include a primary school. Category E would contain all those settlements that are considered important in their immediate local area and some new development would be considered appropriate to meet local needs and support local services and facilities. Category E settlements are: E Category Settlements

Chacewater;

Devoran;

St Issey;

Tregadillett;

Shop (Morwenstow);

Gweek;

Porthtowan;

St Cleer;

Gulval with Trevarrack;

Carharrack;

Praze an Beeble;

St Just in Roseland;

Crantock;

Marhamchurch;

St Kew Highway;

Blackwater;

Tresillian;

Quintrell Downs;

Harrowbarrow;

Breage;

Polzeath with Trebetherick;

Landrake;

Long Rock;

Carnon Downs;

Page 10: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

9

Playing Place;

Carnhell Green with Wall & Realwa;

Cury;

Trewoon;

Ladock;

Egloskerry;

Boyton;

Lanlivery;

Upton Cross;

Lady Cross with Yeolmbridge;

Marshgate;

Godolphin Cross;

St Mellion;

Cardinham;

Jacobstow;

Petherwin Gate;

Coads Green;

Widegates;

Trekenner;

Sithney;

Kehelland;

St Minver;

Crafthole;

Week St Mary;

Rosudgeon;

Nancledra;

Porkellis;

Coverack;

Nanstallon;

Germoe;

Stenalees;

East Taphouse;

Wendron;

Whitemoor;

Gwinear with Gwithian;

Lerryn;

Warbstow Cross;

St Kew;

Cargreen;

Quethiock;

Trewidland;

Cusgarne.

Category F: In the sustainability matrix in appendix 2, category F settlements are those that contain a travel to work bus or rail service and either a general store or a meeting place (hall or pub). Category F settlements are: F Category Settlements

Tranance with Mawgan Porth;

Frogpool;

Tideford;

Widemouth Bay;

Budock Water;

Paul with Sheffield;

Wainhouse Corner;

Scorrier;

Rame;

Ashton;

Tresparrett;

Newtown St Martin;

Lelant;

Sticker;

Feock;

Pentewan;

Carnkie;

Polgooth;

St Ive Cross;

Praa Sands;

Penwithick;

Kelly Bray;

Holywell Bay;

Barripper;

Page 11: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

10

Gwennap;

Treburley;

Mitchell;

St Keyne;

Little Petherick;

Townshend;

Metherell;

Tregurrian with Watergate Bay;

Bridge;

Commonmoor;

Cremyll;

Treviscoe;

Hessenford;

Portloe;

Crow’s Nest & Darite;

Longdowns;

Eastern Green;

Polbathic;

Zelah;

Carleen;

Bolingey;

London Apprentice.

Any other previously designated settlements, other villages and hamlets, and single dwellings will attract policies appropriate to their status in their area. Changes between the 2009 and 2012 Surveys A number of changes have been identified between the surveys of 2009 and 2012 and this has resulted in some settlements changing category. This is usually due to a) better information being provided on facilities in a settlement, b) a gain in facilities if the settlement has moved up a category or c) the loss of facilities in a settlement if the settlement has moved down a category. Those settlements that have moved up a category (mainly as a result of better information being made available) are identified as: Roche (D to C); St Day (D to C); Mount Hawke (D to C); Kingsand with Cawsand (D to C); Stithians (D to C); St Breward (D to C); Lanner (D to C); Mawnan Smith (E to C); Pendeen (D to C); Mylor (D to C); Tregony (D to C); Polperro (E to D); St Germans (E to D); Grampound Road (E to D); Ponsanooth (E to D); Whitstone (E to D); Mawgan & Garras (E to D); Tresillian (F to E); Carnon Downs (F to E); Playing Place (F to E); Carnhell Green with Wall & Realwa (F to E); Crafthole (O to E); Rosudgeon (F to E); Widemouth Bay (O to F).

Page 12: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

11

Those settlements that have moved down a category (mainly as a result of loss of facilities) are identified as: Marhamchurch (D to E); Shop (Morwenstow) (D to E); Long Rock (D to E); Antony (F to O). The Category a Settlement falls into and implications for Development It should be noted that the hierarchy of settlements is not intended to be prescriptive and that the expectations in terms of development and growth are not necessarily identical for settlements under each category. Local characteristics and constraints – e.g. landscape designations or flood risk – will be vital considerations in determining future levels and types of growth.

Given the above caveat, the higher the category a settlement falls into the more new development it could be allocated. Settlements that fall into the ‘A’ and ‘B’ categories could be allocated a significant proportion of the adopted housing growth target as these are the settlements that contain the highest level of facilities, the majority of employment opportunities, and so on, and this is a requirement of current Government guidance. Category ‘C’, ‘D’ and some ‘E’ settlements are all important to their local areas and are likely to be allocated an appropriate level of growth to meet local needs for housing and employment, and to help support existing services and facilities. Some Category ‘E’ and Category ‘F’ settlements provide good travel to work transport links to nearby larger settlements and contain some community facilities, and could therefore be considered as appropriate locations for development.

Information on how new development will be distributed across Cornwall is discussed further in the evidence base background paper ‘Housing Growth & Distribution: Housing Distribution Submission Version’10. Clustering: The study ‘Planning for the role and future of smaller settlements in Cornwall’11 introduces the idea of ‘clusters’ of settlements, and this is explored further in the ‘Small Settlements Study’12. This ‘clustering of settlements’ proposes that instead of looking at settlements individually we could look at how a group of settlements ‘functions’ in a similar way to a much larger settlement. In the same way that neighbourhoods make up a town, a group of smaller settlements could have a similar range of employment, services and facilities as a larger settlement - they just may be slightly further apart. Identifying a group of settlements as a ‘cluster’ provides this ‘cluster’ with opportunities in terms of new development, improved public transport and walking and cycling routes and so forth, and these will be of benefit to the communities in all of the cluster settlements. Some work has already been done on identifying clusters of settlements, but more work needs to be carried out. There are some already in existence such as Truro with Threemilestone and Altarnun with Five Lanes, etc. The outcomes of this additional work could then be used to re-evaluate a ‘cluster settlements’ position in the hierarchy and may change the category to which the cluster belongs. For example, individually, settlement 1 and 2 fall within category D and settlements 3, 4 and 5 fall

10 Cornwall Council (2012) Housing Growth & Distribution: Housing Distribution Submission Version – http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=32813 11 C4G/Roger Tym & Partners/Rural Innovation (2009) Planning for the role and future of smaller settlements in Cornwall - http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=32790 12 URS Scott Wilson (2011) Cornwall Council Small Settlements Study: applicability and deliverability - http://www.cornwall.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=32791

Page 13: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

12

within the proposed category E – taken together as a ‘cluster settlement’ they have the range of services that suggests they collectively fall within category C, and collectively could attract the type of development and associated infrastructure that is appropriate for category C settlements. Gaps or Limitations in Evidence Additional and up-to-date data on the availability of employment in settlements

and employment containment could improve the sustainability matrix – options for this can be explored once detailed Census 2011 information is made available (likely to be in 2013).

Information on key facilities and services can quickly be out of date as some facilities are particularly vulnerable in a poor economic climate such as we are experiencing at this time. This will impact on where a settlement lies in the hierarchy and the category it is attached too.

The hierarchy and category describe settlements as they are now and do not take into account what they could be in the future.

Additional work is proposed as a follow on to identify clusters of settlements. This will have an impact on where a grouping of settlements will fall in the hierarchy and hence the category attached to them.

Key Messages for Spatial Planning Policy A number of key messages and issues were drawn out from this element of the evidence base, and these are summarised below: Robust evidence on community facilities and services, appropriately weighted, can

be effectively used in determining a settlement hierarchy that is not dependent on population size.

This evidence must be kept up to date and under regular review. Settlement categories can be used to determine a level of growth appropriate to

individual or clusters of settlements, but cannot prescribe a set level for each settlement within a category as settlement characteristics and constraints need to be considered.

This process describes settlement as they are at this point in time – it does not take into account what they could become in the future – they could lose services for many reasons that are outside of the control of spatial planning policy. Some settlements could acquire additional services if development is effectively planned.

SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses Consistent and transparent way of

scoring settlements in a hierarchy Consistent and transparent way of

allocating settlements to a category based on the level of facilities and services available to residents.

Information on key services and facilities can quickly be out of date, particularly for the more vulnerable of facilities.

Not all settlements were included in the 2012 update (categories A, B, F and others).

Not all information on settlements surveyed (categories C, D and E) was validated (varying response rate).

Opportunities Threats Real opportunity to treat all

settlement across Cornwall in a consistent fashion.

Appropriate monitoring systems can be set up to keep information up to date.

Time and resources needed to keep information on facilities and services up to date.

If not regularly updated, stakeholders will lose faith in the robustness of data.

Policy based on this evidence open to criticism if information is proven to be out of date.

Page 14: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

13

This paper summarises the evidence on a settlement hierarchy and category to inform the Cornwall Local Plan. However, it will be added to and kept up-to-date as other relevant evidence becomes available. In updating these papers all previous versions will be archived to ensure it is clear what evidence was available at each stage.

Page 15: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

14

Appendix 1 Facility First Score Additional Facility Score Part Time/Combinations Food Shop 4 2 2 (2 if combined with post office,

petrol filling station, etc) Post Office 3 1.5 1.5 (1.5 if combined with food

store, etc) Bank 3 1.5 1.5 Pre-school provision 3 2 2 Primary school 4 2 2 Secondary school 3 1.5 1.5 Hospital 2 1 1 Doctors surgery 4 2 2 Chemist/pharmacy 3 1.5 1.5 Library (permanent) 2 n/a 1 Library (mobile) 1 n/a n/a Pub/social club 3 1.5 1.5 Petrol station 3 1.5 1.5 Community hall 3 1.5 1.5 Place of worship 2 1 1 Leisure centre 3 1.5 1.5 Formal sports area 3 1.5 1.5 Children’s equipped play area 3 1.5 1.5 Travel to work bus/rail service 4 2 2 Other bus/rail service 2 1 1

Page 16: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2Broadband (>2mb or NGB/2mb in settlement/2 mb outside settlement)

Level of Work Self

Containment

One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score Score One Score ScoreA Camborne/Pool/Illogan/Redruth (clustered with Park Bottom) 4 six 12 4 nine 18 4 eleven 22 4 eight 16 4 4 2A Falmouth/Penryn 4 four 8 4 six 12 4 five 10 4 four 8 4 4 2A Truro (inc Threemilestone) 4 four 8 4 eight 16 4 seven 14 4 three 6 4 4 2A St Austell (could also potentially cluster with St Blazey/Par, Trewoon and Tywardreath?) 4 five 10 4 nine 18 4 six 12 4 two 4 4 4 2A Newquay (potential cluster with Crantock) 4 three 6 4 twelve 24 4 three 6 4 one 2 4 4 2A Penzance 4 four 8 4 six 12 4 five 10 4 four 8 4 4 2A Bodmin 4 two 4 4 five 10 4 three 6 4 one 2 4 4 4

B Launceston 4 three 6 4 four 8 4 two 4 4 0 4 4 4B Bude/Stratton/Poughill 4 two 4 4 five 10 4 one 2 4 one 2 4 4 4B Saltash 4 one 2 4 four 8 4 three 6 4 one 2 4 4 2B Helston 4 two 4 4 two 4 4 four 8 4 one 2 4 4 2B St Ives clustered with Carbis Bay (could also cluster with Lelant?) 4 two 4 4 five 10 4 one 2 4 0 4 4 2B Hayle (could potentially be clustered with Phillack) 4 two 4 4 one 2 4 one 2 4 0 4 4 2B Liskeard 4 two 4 4 two 4 4 one 2 4 one 2 4 4 2B Wadebridge 4 two 4 4 one 2 4 one 2 4 one 2 2 4 2

C Torpoint 4 one 2 4 one 2 4 two 4 4 one 2 4 4 2C Looe 4 one 2 4 three 6 4 one 2 4 0 4 4 4C St Blazey/Par (could also potentially cluster with St Austell, Trewoon and Tywardreath?) 4 0 2 six 12 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C Padstow (potential cluster with Trevone) 4 0 4 one 2 4 0 4 0 2 4 4C Perranporth 4 0 4 three 6 4 0 4 0 2 4 2C Callington (potential cluster with Kelly Bray) 4 one 2 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C St Just 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 4 2C Camelford (could potentially be clustered with Helstone & Tregoodwell) 4 0 2 one 2 4 0 4 0 2 4 4C St Agnes 0 0 4 one 1.5 4 one 2 4 0 4 4 2C Lostwithiel 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 4 0 4 0 2C Indian Queens clustered with St Columb Road & Fraddon (could also cluster with Summercourt) 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C Mullion 0 0 4 two 4 4 0 4 0 4 4 4C Fowey 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C St Columb Major 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 2C Roche 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C Newlyn 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C St Stephen (potential cluster with Coombe) 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C Mevagissey (potential cluster with Pentewan) 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C Porthleven 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C Marazion 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C Tintagel 0 0 2 one 2 4 0 4 0 2 4 4C Gunnislake (could potentially be clustered with Albaston, Drakewalls & St Anns Chapel - also with Ca 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C St Dennis (potential cluster with Whitemoor) 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 4 2C Kilkhampton 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 0 0 4 4 4C Rock/Tredrizzick (potential cluster with Polzeath/Trebetherick & St Minver) 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 2 0 1 4 4C St Day (potential cluster with Carharrack) 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 1C Delabole 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 one 2 2 4 4C Mount Hawke 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 2 0 4 4 1C Kingsand/Cawsand 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 2 0 4 4 2C Boscastle 0 0 2 one 2 4 0 4 0 2 4 4C Constantine 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 4 0 2 4 2C Gerrans/Portscatho 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 4C St Merryn/Shop (potential cluster with Constantine Bay) 0 0 4 two 4 4 0 2 0 2 0 4C Stithians 0 0 2 one 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2C St Breward 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 one 2 1 4 2C Heamoor 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 0 0 4 4 2C Lanner 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 1C Mawnan Smith 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 4 2C Pendeen (could be clustered with Trewellard) 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 1 4 4C Mylor/Mylor Bridge (potential cluster with Flushing) 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 4 4 2C Tregony 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 2

D St Erth 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Troon 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 1D Probus 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2D St Mawes 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 4D Bugle (could be clustered with Stenalees, Penwithick, Trethurgy, Carthew & Ruddlemoor) 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 1D Four Lanes 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Menheniot 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 2D St Newlyn East 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2D Albaston, Drakewalls & St Anns Chapel (could potentially be clustered with Gunnislake - also with Ca 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 0 0 4 4 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Supermarket General Stores (half score if combined with post office)

High Sustainable Factors

SettlementTravel To Work

Bus/Rail Service

Primary Schools Doctors Surgery (half score for part time)

Page 17: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2Broadband (>2mb or NGB/2mb in settlement/2 mb outside settlement)

Level of Work Self

Containment

One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score Score One Score Score

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Supermarket General Stores (half score if combined with post office)

High Sustainable Factors

SettlementTravel To Work

Bus/Rail Service

Primary Schools Doctors Surgery (half score for part time)

D Gorran Haven (inc. Gorran Churchtown) 0 0 2 one 2 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Millbrook 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2D Polperro 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 4D Crowlas/Lower Ludgvan 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D St Keverne (potential cluster with Coverack) 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 4D Grampound 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2D St Germans 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 2D Stoke Climsland/Venterdon 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 2D Lanivet/Lamorrick 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Pensilva 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 2D Port Isaac/Port Gaverne 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 4D Sennen 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 0 0 2 4 4D St Buryan (potential cluster with Porthcurno/St Levan) 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 4 4D Pelynt 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 4D Lizard 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 4 2D Cubert 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D St Teath 0 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 1 4 4D Perranwell/Perranworthal 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Trispen 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 1D St Tudy 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 2D Downderry (could be clustered with Seaton) 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 2D Tywardreath (could be a potential cluster with St Austell, St Blazey, Par & Trewoon) 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Veryan 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 4D Grampound Road 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Foxhole (could be clustered with Nanpean and Treviscoe) 0 0 4 one 2 4 0 2 0 4 4 2D Dobwalls 0 0 2 one 2 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D St Dominic 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 2D St Eval 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 4D Connor Downs 0 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 4 4 2D Goonhavern 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2D Ponsanooth 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 1D St Mawgan 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 2D Luxulyan 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Calstock (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, Harro 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2D Goldsithney clustered with St Hilary 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 1D Shortlanesend 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 1D Ruan Minor 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 2D Mabe 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Nanpean (could be clustered with Foxhole and Treviscoe) 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Polruan 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 4D Flushing (potential cluster with Mylor) 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 1 4 2D Leedstown (potential cluster with Praze an Beeble) 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Porthcurno/St Levan (potential cluster with St Buryan) 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 4D Portreath 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 1D St Neot 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2D Lewannick 0 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 2D Mousehole 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 4 2D Altarnun/Five Lanes/Trewint 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2D Duloe 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 4D Madron 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2D Manaccan 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 4D Whitstone 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 4D Blisland 0 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 2D St Mabyn 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 2D Summercourt (potential cluster with Indian Queens/St Columb Road/Fraddon) 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2D Mawgan & Garras 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 4D South Petherwin 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2

E Chacewater 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 1E Crantock (potential cluster with Newquay) 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4E Devoran 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 1E St Issey 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 4E St Kew Highway 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 4 4E Tregadillett 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2E Blackwater 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 1E Shop (Morwenstow) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 4E Tresillian 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 2

Page 18: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2Broadband (>2mb or NGB/2mb in settlement/2 mb outside settlement)

Level of Work Self

Containment

One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score Score One Score Score

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Supermarket General Stores (half score if combined with post office)

High Sustainable Factors

SettlementTravel To Work

Bus/Rail Service

Primary Schools Doctors Surgery (half score for part time)

E Gweek 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2E Quintrell Downs 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2E Porthtowan (Carrick & Kerrier) 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1E Harrowbarrow (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2E St Cleer (could be clustered with Commonmoor, Higher Tremar Coombe, Tremar & Tremar Coombe) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2E Marhamchurch 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2E Breage (potential cluster with Ashton) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2E Gulval/Trevarrack 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2E Polzeath/Trebetherick (potential cluster with Rock/Tredrizzick and St Minver) 0 0 4 one 2 0 0 2 0 2 4 4E Carharrack (potential cluster with St Day) 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1E Landrake 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 2E Praze-an-Beeble (potential cluster with Leedstown) 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 2 4 2E Long Rock 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2E St Just in Roseland 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4E Carnon Downs 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 4 1E Playing Place 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2E St Minver (potential cluster with Rock/Tredrizzick and Polzeath/Trebetherick) 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4E Carnhell Green/Wall/Reawla 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2E Crafthole 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2E Cury (Churchtown and White Cross) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 4E Week St Mary 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4E Trewoon (could cluster with St Austell, St Blazey, Par & Tywardreath) 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2E Rosudgeon 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2E Ladock 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Nancledra 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2E Egloskerry 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Porkellis (potential cluster with Carnkie/Wendron and Rame) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2E Boyton 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 4E Coverack (potential cluster with St Keverne) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 4E Lanlivery 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Nanstallon 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 2E Upton Cross 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2E Germoe (Churchtown and Crossroads) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 2E Lady Cross/Yeolmbridge 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2E Stenalees (could be clustered with Bugle, Penwithick, Trethurgy, Carthew & Ruddlemoor) 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 1E Marshgate (potential cluster with Tresparrett) 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 4E East Taphouse 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Godolphin Cross 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2E Wendron (Churchtown) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2E St Mellion 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2E Whitemoor (potential cluster with St Dennis) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2E Cardinham 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 2E Gwinear/Gwithian 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 1E Jacobstow (could potentially be clustered with Wainhouse Corner) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 4E Lerryn 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 4E Petherwin Gate 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Warbstow Cross 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Coads Green 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 2E St Kew 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 4E Widegates 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 2E Cargreen 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Trekenner (potential cluster with Treburley and Lezant) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Quethiock 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Sithney 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 2E Trewidland 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Kehelland 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2E Cusgarne (potential cluster with Frogpool) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 2

F Trenance/Mawgan Porth 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Lelant (could cluster with St Ives & Carbis Bay) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Frogpool (potential cluster with Cusgarne) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Sticker 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Tideford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Feock 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1F Widemouth Bay 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 2F Pentewan (potential cluster with Mevagissey) 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Budock Water 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 1

Page 19: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2Broadband (>2mb or NGB/2mb in settlement/2 mb outside settlement)

Level of Work Self

Containment

One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score Score One Score Score

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Supermarket General Stores (half score if combined with post office)

High Sustainable Factors

SettlementTravel To Work

Bus/Rail Service

Primary Schools Doctors Surgery (half score for part time)

F Carnkie (Wendron) (potential cluster with Porkellis and Rame) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Paul/Sheffield 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Polgooth 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Wainhouse Corner (could potentially be clustered with Jacobstow) 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4F St Ive Cross 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Scorrier 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Praa Sands 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Rame (potential cluster with Carnkie/Wendron and Porkellis) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Penwithick (could potentially be clustered with Bugle, Stenalees, Trethurgy, Carthew/Ruddlemoor) 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1F Ashton (potential cluster with Breage) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Kelly Bray (potential cluster with Callington) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Tresparrett (potential cluster with Marshgate) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4F Holywell Bay 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Newtown St Martin (potential cluster with St Martins Green) 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4F Barripper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Gwennap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Treviscoe (potential cluster with Foxhole and Nanpean) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Treburley (potential cluster with Trekenner and Lezant) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Hessenford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Mitchell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 2F Portloe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4F St Keyne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4F Crow's Nest & Darite 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Little Petherick 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4F Longdowns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Townshend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Eastern Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Metherell (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, Harr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2F Polbathic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Tregurrian/Watergate Bay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Zelah 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1F Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 1F Carleen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Commonmoor (could be clustered with St Cleer, Higher Tremar Coombe, Tremar & Tremar Coombe) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Bolingey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F Cremyll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2F London Apprentice 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2

O Trevone (potential cluster with Padstow) 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Higher Crackington 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Luckett 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Lanreath 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4O North Hill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2O Grimscott 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Antony 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Brea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Carnkie (Redruth) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Helford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Berepper (Gunwalloe) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Rilla Mill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2O Bangors/Treskinnick Cross 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O North Country 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2O Philleigh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Seaton (could be clustered with Downderry) 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Wilcove 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Chapel Amble 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Rose 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Coombe (potential cluster with St Stephen) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Malpas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2O Mithian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O North Tamerton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4O Polyphant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Porthallow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Ruanlanihorne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Nomansland 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Penmarth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Nancegollan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

Page 20: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2Broadband (>2mb or NGB/2mb in settlement/2 mb outside settlement)

Level of Work Self

Containment

One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score Score One Score Score

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Supermarket General Stores (half score if combined with post office)

High Sustainable Factors

SettlementTravel To Work

Bus/Rail Service

Primary Schools Doctors Surgery (half score for part time)

O Pillaton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Porthcothan 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Minions 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Phillack 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Botus Fleming 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Constantine Bay (potential cluster with St Merryn/Shop) 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Golant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Hatt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Tresmeer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Withiel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Golberdon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Rumford 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4O St John 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O St Martins Green (potential cluster with Newtown St Martins) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Trelights 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Trewellard (could be clustered with Pendeen) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O St Michael Penkevil 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Trethowel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Whitecross (Wadebridge) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2O Trevelmond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Cadgwith 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Chilsworthy (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Calstock, Harro 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Helstone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4O Kuggar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Lawhitton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Lezant (potential cluster with Treburley and Trekenner) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Porthoustock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Porthpean 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2O Roseannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Sheviock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2O Trewennack 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Herodsfoot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Pendoggett 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Trebullett 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Treverva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Crowntown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Higher Tremar Coombe (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar & Tremar Coombe) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2O Linkinhorne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Merrymeet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Polkerris 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Rising Sun 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2O Trevarrian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Crowan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Mount 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Port Navas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Tremar (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar Coombe & Higher Tremar Coombe) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2O Trerulefoot 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Twelveheads 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Portholland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Bodinnick 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4O Carkeel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Forder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Portwrinkle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Trematon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Trethurgy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Bethany 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Carthew/Ruddlemoor (could potentially be clustered with Bugle, Stenalees, Penwithick & Trethurgy) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Latchley (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, Harro 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Penponds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Daws House 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Henwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Longstone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Lowertown 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Polmassick 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Stepaside/Hillside 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2O Tremar Coombe (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar & Higher Tremar Coombe) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

Page 21: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2Broadband (>2mb or NGB/2mb in settlement/2 mb outside settlement)

Level of Work Self

Containment

One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score Score One Score Score

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Supermarket General Stores (half score if combined with post office)

High Sustainable Factors

SettlementTravel To Work

Bus/Rail Service

Primary Schools Doctors Surgery (half score for part time)

O Bissoe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1O Trehan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Page 22: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

A Camborne/Pool/Illogan/Redruth (clustered with Park Bottom)A Falmouth/PenrynA Truro (inc Threemilestone)A St Austell (could also potentially cluster with St Blazey/Par, Trewoon and Tywardreath?)A Newquay (potential cluster with Crantock)A Penzance A Bodmin

B LauncestonB Bude/Stratton/PoughillB SaltashB HelstonB St Ives clustered with Carbis Bay (could also cluster with Lelant?)B Hayle (could potentially be clustered with Phillack)B LiskeardB Wadebridge

C TorpointC LooeC St Blazey/Par (could also potentially cluster with St Austell, Trewoon and Tywardreath?)C Padstow (potential cluster with Trevone)C PerranporthC Callington (potential cluster with Kelly Bray)C St JustC Camelford (could potentially be clustered with Helstone & Tregoodwell)C St AgnesC LostwithielC Indian Queens clustered with St Columb Road & Fraddon (could also cluster with Summercourt)C MullionC FoweyC St Columb MajorC RocheC NewlynC St Stephen (potential cluster with Coombe)C Mevagissey (potential cluster with Pentewan)C PorthlevenC MarazionC TintagelC Gunnislake (could potentially be clustered with Albaston, Drakewalls & St Anns Chapel - also with CC St Dennis (potential cluster with Whitemoor)C KilkhamptonC Rock/Tredrizzick (potential cluster with Polzeath/Trebetherick & St Minver)C St Day (potential cluster with Carharrack)C DelaboleC Mount HawkeC Kingsand/CawsandC BoscastleC ConstantineC Gerrans/PortscathoC St Merryn/Shop (potential cluster with Constantine Bay)C StithiansC St BrewardC HeamoorC LannerC Mawnan SmithC Pendeen (could be clustered with Trewellard)C Mylor/Mylor Bridge (potential cluster with Flushing)C Tregony

D St ErthD TroonD ProbusD St MawesD Bugle (could be clustered with Stenalees, Penwithick, Trethurgy, Carthew & Ruddlemoor)D Four LanesD MenheniotD St Newlyn EastD Albaston, Drakewalls & St Anns Chapel (could potentially be clustered with Gunnislake - also with C

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

Large Medium Small Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One94 3 two 3 3 fourteen 21 3 six 9 3 hirty seven 55.5 3 ten 15 64 3 one 1.5 3 eight 12 3 three 4.5 3 fifteen 22.5 3 nine 13.5 70 3 two 3 3 fifteen 22.5 3 one 1.5 3 twenty 30 3 five 7.5 70 3 one 1.5 3 twelve 18 3 five 7.5 3 eighteen 27 3 three 4.5 64 3 one 1.5 3 nine 13.5 3 three 4.5 3 twelve 18 3 three 4.5 64 3 one 1.5 3 eight 12 3 one 1.5 3 seven 10.5 3 three 4.5 50 3 0 3 five 7.5 1.5 0 3 six 9 3 three 4.5

46 3 0 3 seven 10.5 3 one 1.5 3 seven 10.5 3 three 4.5 46 3 0 3 four 6 3 one 1.5 3 seven 10.5 3 three 4.5 44 3 0 3 three 4.5 3 one 1.5 3 fifteen 22.5 3 two 3 44 3 0 3 five 7.5 1.5 0 3 twelve 18 3 two 3 42 3 0 3 five 7.5 3 one 1.5 3 four 6 3 three 4.5 34 3 0 3 two 3 3 one 1.5 3 eight 12 3 two 3 38 3 0 3 five 7.5 3 0 3 nine 13.5 3 one 1.5 34 3 0 3 three 4.5 3 0 3 six 9 3 one 1.5

36 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 six 9 3 one 1.5 38 3 0 3 two 3 3 one 1.5 3 three 4.5 3 one 1.5 36 0 0 3 0 1.5 two 3 3 seven 10.5 3 one 1.5 28 0 0 3 two 3 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 30 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 3 one 1.5 28 3 0 3 two 3 3 0 3 three 4.5 3 0 24 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 26 3 0 3 two 3 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 3 0

25.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 20 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 3 five 7.5 3 0 26 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 two 3 0 0 28 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 24 3 0 3 one 1.5 3 one 1.5 3 0 3 0 20 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 26 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 26 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 two 3 0 0 22 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 two 3 3 0 24 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 22 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 3 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 20 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 two 3 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 two 3 0 0 20 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 20 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0

16 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 3 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 22 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 3 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 two 3 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0

M

Post Office (half score if combined with other facility) Pre-School Provision Chemist/ PharmacySecondary School Bank/Building SocietyEmployment Estates/Town

Centres/Rural WorkshopsInterim Score

Page 23: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

D Gorran Haven (inc. Gorran Churchtown)D MillbrookD PolperroD Crowlas/Lower LudgvanD St Keverne (potential cluster with Coverack)D Grampound D St GermansD Stoke Climsland/VenterdonD Lanivet/LamorrickD PensilvaD Port Isaac/Port GaverneD SennenD St Buryan (potential cluster with Porthcurno/St Levan)D PelyntD LizardD CubertD St TeathD Perranwell/PerranworthalD TrispenD St TudyD Downderry (could be clustered with Seaton)D Tywardreath (could be a potential cluster with St Austell, St Blazey, Par & Trewoon)D VeryanD Grampound RoadD Foxhole (could be clustered with Nanpean and Treviscoe)D DobwallsD St DominicD St EvalD Connor DownsD GoonhavernD PonsanoothD St MawganD LuxulyanD Calstock (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, HarD Goldsithney clustered with St HilaryD ShortlanesendD Ruan MinorD MabeD Nanpean (could be clustered with Foxhole and Treviscoe)D PolruanD Flushing (potential cluster with Mylor)D Leedstown (potential cluster with Praze an Beeble)D Porthcurno/St Levan (potential cluster with St Buryan)D PortreathD St NeotD LewannickD MouseholeD Altarnun/Five Lanes/TrewintD DuloeD MadronD ManaccanD WhitstoneD BlislandD St MabynD Summercourt (potential cluster with Indian Queens/St Columb Road/Fraddon)D Mawgan & GarrasD South Petherwin

E ChacewaterE Crantock (potential cluster with Newquay)E DevoranE St IsseyE St Kew HighwayE TregadillettE BlackwaterE Shop (Morwenstow)E Tresillian

Large Medium Small Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One

M

Post Office (half score if combined with other facility) Pre-School Provision Chemist/ PharmacySecondary School Bank/Building SocietyEmployment Estates/Town

Centres/Rural WorkshopsInterim Score

18 0 0 0 0 1.5 one 1.5 3 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 20 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 two 3 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 two 3 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 two 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 two 3 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0

11 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0

15 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0

17 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0

Page 24: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

E GweekE Quintrell DownsE Porthtowan (Carrick & Kerrier)E Harrowbarrow (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, ChilsworthyE St Cleer (could be clustered with Commonmoor, Higher Tremar Coombe, Tremar & Tremar CoombeE MarhamchurchE Breage (potential cluster with Ashton)E Gulval/TrevarrackE Polzeath/Trebetherick (potential cluster with Rock/Tredrizzick and St Minver)E Carharrack (potential cluster with St Day)E LandrakeE Praze-an-Beeble (potential cluster with Leedstown)E Long RockE St Just in RoselandE Carnon DownsE Playing PlaceE St Minver (potential cluster with Rock/Tredrizzick and Polzeath/Trebetherick)E Carnhell Green/Wall/ReawlaE CraftholeE Cury (Churchtown and White Cross)E Week St MaryE Trewoon (could cluster with St Austell, St Blazey, Par & Tywardreath)E RosudgeonE LadockE NancledraE EgloskerryE Porkellis (potential cluster with Carnkie/Wendron and Rame)E BoytonE Coverack (potential cluster with St Keverne)E LanliveryE NanstallonE Upton CrossE Germoe (Churchtown and Crossroads)E Lady Cross/YeolmbridgeE Stenalees (could be clustered with Bugle, Penwithick, Trethurgy, Carthew & Ruddlemoor)E Marshgate (potential cluster with Tresparrett)E East TaphouseE Godolphin CrossE Wendron (Churchtown)E St MellionE Whitemoor (potential cluster with St Dennis)E CardinhamE Gwinear/GwithianE Jacobstow (could potentially be clustered with Wainhouse Corner)E LerrynE Petherwin GateE Warbstow CrossE Coads GreenE St Kew E WidegatesE CargreenE Trekenner (potential cluster with Treburley and Lezant)E QuethiockE SithneyE TrewidlandE KehellandE Cusgarne (potential cluster with Frogpool)

F Trenance/Mawgan PorthF Lelant (could cluster with St Ives & Carbis Bay)F Frogpool (potential cluster with Cusgarne)F StickerF TidefordF FeockF Widemouth BayF Pentewan (potential cluster with Mevagissey)F Budock Water

Large Medium Small Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One

M

Post Office (half score if combined with other facility) Pre-School Provision Chemist/ PharmacySecondary School Bank/Building SocietyEmployment Estates/Town

Centres/Rural WorkshopsInterim Score

12 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0

14 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0

11 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0

11 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0

13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0

11 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0

12 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

14 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0

13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 25: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

F Carnkie (Wendron) (potential cluster with Porkellis and Rame)F Paul/SheffieldF PolgoothF Wainhouse Corner (could potentially be clustered with Jacobstow)F St Ive CrossF ScorrierF Praa SandsF Rame (potential cluster with Carnkie/Wendron and Porkellis)F Penwithick (could potentially be clustered with Bugle, Stenalees, Trethurgy, Carthew/Ruddlemoor)F Ashton (potential cluster with Breage)F Kelly Bray (potential cluster with Callington)F Tresparrett (potential cluster with Marshgate)F Holywell BayF Newtown St Martin (potential cluster with St Martins Green)F BarripperF GwennapF Treviscoe (potential cluster with Foxhole and Nanpean)F Treburley (potential cluster with Trekenner and Lezant)F HessenfordF MitchellF PortloeF St KeyneF Crow's Nest & DariteF Little PetherickF LongdownsF TownshendF Eastern GreenF Metherell (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, HaF PolbathicF Tregurrian/Watergate BayF ZelahF BridgeF CarleenF Commonmoor (could be clustered with St Cleer, Higher Tremar Coombe, Tremar & Tremar CoombeF BolingeyF CremyllF London Apprentice

O Trevone (potential cluster with Padstow)O Higher CrackingtonO LuckettO LanreathO North HillO GrimscottO AntonyO BreaO Carnkie (Redruth)O HelfordO Berepper (Gunwalloe)O Rilla MillO Bangors/Treskinnick CrossO North CountryO PhilleighO Seaton (could be clustered with Downderry)O WilcoveO Chapel AmbleO Rose O Coombe (potential cluster with St Stephen)O MalpasO MithianO North TamertonO PolyphantO PorthallowO RuanlanihorneO NomanslandO PenmarthO Nancegollan

Large Medium Small Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One

M

Post Office (half score if combined with other facility) Pre-School Provision Chemist/ PharmacySecondary School Bank/Building SocietyEmployment Estates/Town

Centres/Rural WorkshopsInterim Score

7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

12 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Page 26: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

O PillatonO PorthcothanO MinionsO PhillackO Botus FlemingO Constantine Bay (potential cluster with St Merryn/Shop)O GolantO HattO TresmeerO WithielO GolberdonO RumfordO St JohnO St Martins Green (potential cluster with Newtown St Martins)O TrelightsO Trewellard (could be clustered with Pendeen)O St Michael PenkevilO TrethowelO Whitecross (Wadebridge)O TrevelmondO CadgwithO Chilsworthy (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Calstock, HarO HelstoneO KuggarO LawhittonO Lezant (potential cluster with Treburley and Trekenner)O PorthoustockO PorthpeanO RoseannonO SheviockO TrewennackO HerodsfootO PendoggettO TrebullettO TrevervaO CrowntownO Higher Tremar Coombe (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar & Tremar CoombeO LinkinhorneO MerrymeetO PolkerrisO Rising SunO TrevarrianO CrowanO MountO Port NavasO Tremar (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar Coombe & Higher Tremar CoombeO TrerulefootO TwelveheadsO PorthollandO BodinnickO CarkeelO ForderO PortwrinkleO TrematonO TrethurgyO BethanyO Carthew/Ruddlemoor (could potentially be clustered with Bugle, Stenalees, Penwithick & Trethurgy)O Latchley (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, HarO PenpondsO Daws HouseO HenwoodO LongstoneO LowertownO PolmassickO Stepaside/HillsideO Tremar Coombe (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar & Higher Tremar Coombe

Large Medium Small Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One

M

Post Office (half score if combined with other facility) Pre-School Provision Chemist/ PharmacySecondary School Bank/Building SocietyEmployment Estates/Town

Centres/Rural WorkshopsInterim Score

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 27: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

O BissoeO Trehan

Large Medium Small Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One

M

Post Office (half score if combined with other facility) Pre-School Provision Chemist/ PharmacySecondary School Bank/Building SocietyEmployment Estates/Town

Centres/Rural WorkshopsInterim Score

2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 28: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

A Camborne/Pool/Illogan/Redruth (clustered with Park Bottom)A Falmouth/PenrynA Truro (inc Threemilestone)A St Austell (could also potentially cluster with St Blazey/Par, Trewoon and Tywardreath?)A Newquay (potential cluster with Crantock)A Penzance A Bodmin

B LauncestonB Bude/Stratton/PoughillB SaltashB HelstonB St Ives clustered with Carbis Bay (could also cluster with Lelant?)B Hayle (could potentially be clustered with Phillack)B LiskeardB Wadebridge

C TorpointC LooeC St Blazey/Par (could also potentially cluster with St Austell, Trewoon and Tywardreath?)C Padstow (potential cluster with Trevone)C PerranporthC Callington (potential cluster with Kelly Bray)C St JustC Camelford (could potentially be clustered with Helstone & Tregoodwell)C St AgnesC LostwithielC Indian Queens clustered with St Columb Road & Fraddon (could also cluster with Summercourt)C MullionC FoweyC St Columb MajorC RocheC NewlynC St Stephen (potential cluster with Coombe)C Mevagissey (potential cluster with Pentewan)C PorthlevenC MarazionC TintagelC Gunnislake (could potentially be clustered with Albaston, Drakewalls & St Anns Chapel - also with CC St Dennis (potential cluster with Whitemoor)C KilkhamptonC Rock/Tredrizzick (potential cluster with Polzeath/Trebetherick & St Minver)C St Day (potential cluster with Carharrack)C DelaboleC Mount HawkeC Kingsand/CawsandC BoscastleC ConstantineC Gerrans/PortscathoC St Merryn/Shop (potential cluster with Constantine Bay)C StithiansC St BrewardC HeamoorC LannerC Mawnan SmithC Pendeen (could be clustered with Trewellard)C Mylor/Mylor Bridge (potential cluster with Flushing)C Tregony

D St ErthD TroonD ProbusD St MawesD Bugle (could be clustered with Stenalees, Penwithick, Trethurgy, Carthew & Ruddlemoor)D Four LanesD MenheniotD St Newlyn EastD Albaston, Drakewalls & St Anns Chapel (could potentially be clustered with Gunnislake - also with C

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score3 wenty nine 43.5 3 one 1.5 3 twenty two 33 3 two 3 3 thirty three 49.5 3 five 7.5 274.53 thirty two 48 3 two 3 3 twenty fou 36 3 six 9 3 fourteen 21 3 eighteen 27 2313 fourteen 21 3 two 3 3 eighteen 27 3 one 1.5 3 eight 12 3 nineteen 28.5 190.53 twelve 18 3 five 7.5 3 fourteen 21 3 0 3 fourteen 21 3 three 4.5 163.53 thirty one 46.5 3 two 3 3 three 4.5 3 one 1.5 3 six 9 3 two 3 142.53 twenty-two 33 3 two 3 3 seven 10.5 3 two 3 3 nine 13.5 3 five 7.5 133.53 eleven 16.5 3 four 6 3 twelve 18 3 0 3 eighteen 27 3 ten 15 135

3 eleven 16.5 3 three 4.5 3 fourteen 21 3 0 3 fifteen 22.5 3 five 7.5 1323 twelve 18 3 one 1.5 3 thirteen 19.5 3 0 3 twelve 18 3 seven 10.5 1233 six 9 3 three 4.5 3 twelve 18 3 one 1.5 3 thirteen 19.5 3 four 6 1233 five 7.5 3 one 1.5 3 eleven 16.5 3 0 3 eight 12 3 six 9 106.53 twelve 18 0 0 3 eleven 16.5 3 0 3 five 7.5 3 four 6 97.53 six 9 3 one 1.5 3 seven 10.5 0 0 3 fifteen 22.5 3 three 4.5 97.53 seven 10.5 3 0 3 eight 12 3 0 3 three 4.5 3 one 1.5 843 four 6 3 0 3 twelve 18 3 0 3 five 7.5 3 two 3 82.5

3 six 9 3 one 1.5 3 five 7.5 3 one 1.5 3 nine 13.5 3 0 753 nine 13.5 3 0 3 five 7.5 3 0 3 three 4.5 3 0 693 four 6 3 one 1.5 3 four 6 0 0 3 four 6 3 one 1.5 61.53 seven 10.5 3 0 3 nine 13.5 0 0 3 two 3 3 two 3 603 seven 10.5 3 0 3 four 6 0 0 3 four 6 3 three 4.5 573 one 1.5 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 3 six 9 3 five 7.5 58.53 five 7.5 0 0 3 nine 13.5 3 one 1.5 3 six 9 3 two 3 61.53 three 4.5 3 0 3 six 9 3 0 3 two 3 3 one 1.5 543 three 4.5 0 0 3 seven 10.5 0 0 3 five 7.5 3 0 46.53 four 6 3 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 46.53 three 4.5 3 one 1.5 3 seven 11.5 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 41.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 four 6 3 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 37.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 three 4.5 3 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 40.53 one 1.5 3 0 3 five 7.5 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 423 one 1.5 3 0 3 five 7.5 0 0 3 four 6 3 two 3 40.53 five 7.5 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 two 3 3 one 1.5 393 one 1.5 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 five 7.5 3 0 363 four 6 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 393 two 3 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 four 6 3 0 363 four 6 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 34.53 four 6 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 three 4.5 3 0 34.53 three 4.5 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 two 3 3 one 1.5 333 one 1.5 3 one 1.5 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 333 one 1.5 0 0 3 three 4.5 3 0 3 one 1.5 3 one 1.5 31.53 three 4.5 3 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 34.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 five 7.5 0 0 3 three 4.5 3 0 31.53 0 3 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 303 0 0 0 3 four 6 0 0 3 two 3 3 one 1.5 303 three 4.5 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 31.53 two 3 3 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 273 one 1.5 0 0 3 four 6 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 28.53 two 3 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 303 one 1.5 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 two 3 3 one 1.5 273 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 four 6 3 0 273 0 0 0 3 five 7.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 303 0 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 3 two 3 3 one 1.5 31.53 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 three 4.5 3 0 25.53 two 3 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 273 one 1.5 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 28.53 two 3 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 273 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 one 1.5 27

3 two 3 3 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 28.53 0 0 0 3 four 6 0 0 3 three 4.5 3 one 1.5 31.53 one 1.5 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 243 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 25.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 four 6 3 0 243 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 25.53 0 0 0 3 four 6 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 28.53 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 three 4.5 3 one 1.5 28.53 one 1.5 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 24

Community Hall Leisure Centre/Swimming Pool Formal Sports Area/Playing Pitch

Interim Score

Medium Sustainable Factors

Children's Equipped Play AreaPub/ Social Club Petrol Filling Station (half score if shared with another facility)

Page 29: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

D Gorran Haven (inc. Gorran Churchtown)D MillbrookD PolperroD Crowlas/Lower LudgvanD St Keverne (potential cluster with Coverack)D Grampound D St GermansD Stoke Climsland/VenterdonD Lanivet/LamorrickD PensilvaD Port Isaac/Port GaverneD SennenD St Buryan (potential cluster with Porthcurno/St Levan)D PelyntD LizardD CubertD St TeathD Perranwell/PerranworthalD TrispenD St TudyD Downderry (could be clustered with Seaton)D Tywardreath (could be a potential cluster with St Austell, St Blazey, Par & Trewoon)D VeryanD Grampound RoadD Foxhole (could be clustered with Nanpean and Treviscoe)D DobwallsD St DominicD St EvalD Connor DownsD GoonhavernD PonsanoothD St MawganD LuxulyanD Calstock (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, HarD Goldsithney clustered with St HilaryD ShortlanesendD Ruan MinorD MabeD Nanpean (could be clustered with Foxhole and Treviscoe)D PolruanD Flushing (potential cluster with Mylor)D Leedstown (potential cluster with Praze an Beeble)D Porthcurno/St Levan (potential cluster with St Buryan)D PortreathD St NeotD LewannickD MouseholeD Altarnun/Five Lanes/TrewintD DuloeD MadronD ManaccanD WhitstoneD BlislandD St MabynD Summercourt (potential cluster with Indian Queens/St Columb Road/Fraddon)D Mawgan & GarrasD South Petherwin

E ChacewaterE Crantock (potential cluster with Newquay)E DevoranE St IsseyE St Kew HighwayE TregadillettE BlackwaterE Shop (Morwenstow)E Tresillian

Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score

Community Hall Leisure Centre/Swimming Pool Formal Sports Area/Playing Pitch

Interim Score

Medium Sustainable Factors

Children's Equipped Play AreaPub/ Social Club Petrol Filling Station (half score if shared with another facility)

3 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 243 two 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 243 two 3 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 243 one 1.5 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 25.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 19.53 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 213 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 3 0 213 0 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 273 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 22.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 19.53 two 3 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 19.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 213 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 213 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 22.53 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 213 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 213 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 213 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 22.53 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 22.53 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 one 1.5 22.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 183 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 one 1.5 213 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 210 0 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 16.53 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 183 0 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 213 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 two 3 213 0 1.5 0 3 two 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 19.53 0 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 22.53 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 19.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 19.53 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 183 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 19.53 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 19.53 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 19.50 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 183 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 16.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 153 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 16.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 153 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 153 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 two 3 3 0 183 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 16.53 two 3 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 19.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 183 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 153 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 19.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 153 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 153 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 183 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 153 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 13.53 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 16.5

3 two 3 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 one 1.5 273 one 1.5 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 22.54 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 21.53 two 3 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 22.53 one 1.5 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 two 3 3 one 1.5 22.53 1.5 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 22.53 one 1.5 3 one 1.5 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 22.53 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 22.53 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 22.5

Page 30: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

E GweekE Quintrell DownsE Porthtowan (Carrick & Kerrier)E Harrowbarrow (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, ChilsworthyE St Cleer (could be clustered with Commonmoor, Higher Tremar Coombe, Tremar & Tremar CoombeE MarhamchurchE Breage (potential cluster with Ashton)E Gulval/TrevarrackE Polzeath/Trebetherick (potential cluster with Rock/Tredrizzick and St Minver)E Carharrack (potential cluster with St Day)E LandrakeE Praze-an-Beeble (potential cluster with Leedstown)E Long RockE St Just in RoselandE Carnon DownsE Playing PlaceE St Minver (potential cluster with Rock/Tredrizzick and Polzeath/Trebetherick)E Carnhell Green/Wall/ReawlaE CraftholeE Cury (Churchtown and White Cross)E Week St MaryE Trewoon (could cluster with St Austell, St Blazey, Par & Tywardreath)E RosudgeonE LadockE NancledraE EgloskerryE Porkellis (potential cluster with Carnkie/Wendron and Rame)E BoytonE Coverack (potential cluster with St Keverne)E LanliveryE NanstallonE Upton CrossE Germoe (Churchtown and Crossroads)E Lady Cross/YeolmbridgeE Stenalees (could be clustered with Bugle, Penwithick, Trethurgy, Carthew & Ruddlemoor)E Marshgate (potential cluster with Tresparrett)E East TaphouseE Godolphin CrossE Wendron (Churchtown)E St MellionE Whitemoor (potential cluster with St Dennis)E CardinhamE Gwinear/GwithianE Jacobstow (could potentially be clustered with Wainhouse Corner)E LerrynE Petherwin GateE Warbstow CrossE Coads GreenE St Kew E WidegatesE CargreenE Trekenner (potential cluster with Treburley and Lezant)E QuethiockE SithneyE TrewidlandE KehellandE Cusgarne (potential cluster with Frogpool)

F Trenance/Mawgan PorthF Lelant (could cluster with St Ives & Carbis Bay)F Frogpool (potential cluster with Cusgarne)F StickerF TidefordF FeockF Widemouth BayF Pentewan (potential cluster with Mevagissey)F Budock Water

Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score

Community Hall Leisure Centre/Swimming Pool Formal Sports Area/Playing Pitch

Interim Score

Medium Sustainable Factors

Children's Equipped Play AreaPub/ Social Club Petrol Filling Station (half score if shared with another facility)

3 0 0 0 3 three 4.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 213 two 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 213 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 19.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 183 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 3 0 180 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 16.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 19.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 16.53 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 123 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 153 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 153 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 one 1.5 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 16.53 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 3 0 13.50 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 153 0 3 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 3 0 153 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 153 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 13.53 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 13.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 16.53 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 16.5

1.5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 16.53 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 16.50 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 153 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 13.50 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 10.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 16.50 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 10.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 13.50 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 120 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 10.50 0 1.5 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 153 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 10.53 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 10.53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 90 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 10.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 120 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 7.50 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 13.53 three 4.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 153 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 3 0 13.53 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.53 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 16.53 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 123 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 10.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 3 0 10.5

Page 31: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

F Carnkie (Wendron) (potential cluster with Porkellis and Rame)F Paul/SheffieldF PolgoothF Wainhouse Corner (could potentially be clustered with Jacobstow)F St Ive CrossF ScorrierF Praa SandsF Rame (potential cluster with Carnkie/Wendron and Porkellis)F Penwithick (could potentially be clustered with Bugle, Stenalees, Trethurgy, Carthew/Ruddlemoor)F Ashton (potential cluster with Breage)F Kelly Bray (potential cluster with Callington)F Tresparrett (potential cluster with Marshgate)F Holywell BayF Newtown St Martin (potential cluster with St Martins Green)F BarripperF GwennapF Treviscoe (potential cluster with Foxhole and Nanpean)F Treburley (potential cluster with Trekenner and Lezant)F HessenfordF MitchellF PortloeF St KeyneF Crow's Nest & DariteF Little PetherickF LongdownsF TownshendF Eastern GreenF Metherell (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, HaF PolbathicF Tregurrian/Watergate BayF ZelahF BridgeF CarleenF Commonmoor (could be clustered with St Cleer, Higher Tremar Coombe, Tremar & Tremar CoombeF BolingeyF CremyllF London Apprentice

O Trevone (potential cluster with Padstow)O Higher CrackingtonO LuckettO LanreathO North HillO GrimscottO AntonyO BreaO Carnkie (Redruth)O HelfordO Berepper (Gunwalloe)O Rilla MillO Bangors/Treskinnick CrossO North CountryO PhilleighO Seaton (could be clustered with Downderry)O WilcoveO Chapel AmbleO Rose O Coombe (potential cluster with St Stephen)O MalpasO MithianO North TamertonO PolyphantO PorthallowO RuanlanihorneO NomanslandO PenmarthO Nancegollan

Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score

Community Hall Leisure Centre/Swimming Pool Formal Sports Area/Playing Pitch

Interim Score

Medium Sustainable Factors

Children's Equipped Play AreaPub/ Social Club Petrol Filling Station (half score if shared with another facility)

3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 13.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 3 0 13.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.53 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 123 one 1.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.53 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.53 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 63 one 1.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

1.5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 63 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 10.53 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 153 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 10.50 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 93 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 93 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 90 0 0 0 3 two 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 33 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 63 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 7.50 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 3 0 0 0 10.50 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 63 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.50 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.50 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 9

Page 32: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

O PillatonO PorthcothanO MinionsO PhillackO Botus FlemingO Constantine Bay (potential cluster with St Merryn/Shop)O GolantO HattO TresmeerO WithielO GolberdonO RumfordO St JohnO St Martins Green (potential cluster with Newtown St Martins)O TrelightsO Trewellard (could be clustered with Pendeen)O St Michael PenkevilO TrethowelO Whitecross (Wadebridge)O TrevelmondO CadgwithO Chilsworthy (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Calstock, HarO HelstoneO KuggarO LawhittonO Lezant (potential cluster with Treburley and Trekenner)O PorthoustockO PorthpeanO RoseannonO SheviockO TrewennackO HerodsfootO PendoggettO TrebullettO TrevervaO CrowntownO Higher Tremar Coombe (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar & Tremar CoombeO LinkinhorneO MerrymeetO PolkerrisO Rising SunO TrevarrianO CrowanO MountO Port NavasO Tremar (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar Coombe & Higher Tremar CoombeO TrerulefootO TwelveheadsO PorthollandO BodinnickO CarkeelO ForderO PortwrinkleO TrematonO TrethurgyO BethanyO Carthew/Ruddlemoor (could potentially be clustered with Bugle, Stenalees, Penwithick & Trethurgy)O Latchley (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, HarO PenpondsO Daws HouseO HenwoodO LongstoneO LowertownO PolmassickO Stepaside/HillsideO Tremar Coombe (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar & Higher Tremar Coombe

Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score

Community Hall Leisure Centre/Swimming Pool Formal Sports Area/Playing Pitch

Interim Score

Medium Sustainable Factors

Children's Equipped Play AreaPub/ Social Club Petrol Filling Station (half score if shared with another facility)

3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.53 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7.53 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 33 one 1.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.50 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 60 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 one 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 33: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

O BissoeO Trehan

Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score One Score Others Score

Community Hall Leisure Centre/Swimming Pool Formal Sports Area/Playing Pitch

Interim Score

Medium Sustainable Factors

Children's Equipped Play AreaPub/ Social Club Petrol Filling Station (half score if shared with another facility)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 34: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

A Camborne/Pool/Illogan/Redruth (clustered with Park Bottom)A Falmouth/PenrynA Truro (inc Threemilestone)A St Austell (could also potentially cluster with St Blazey/Par, Trewoon and Tywardreath?)A Newquay (potential cluster with Crantock)A Penzance A Bodmin

B LauncestonB Bude/Stratton/PoughillB SaltashB HelstonB St Ives clustered with Carbis Bay (could also cluster with Lelant?)B Hayle (could potentially be clustered with Phillack)B LiskeardB Wadebridge

C TorpointC LooeC St Blazey/Par (could also potentially cluster with St Austell, Trewoon and Tywardreath?)C Padstow (potential cluster with Trevone)C PerranporthC Callington (potential cluster with Kelly Bray)C St JustC Camelford (could potentially be clustered with Helstone & Tregoodwell)C St AgnesC LostwithielC Indian Queens clustered with St Columb Road & Fraddon (could also cluster with Summercourt)C MullionC FoweyC St Columb MajorC RocheC NewlynC St Stephen (potential cluster with Coombe)C Mevagissey (potential cluster with Pentewan)C PorthlevenC MarazionC TintagelC Gunnislake (could potentially be clustered with Albaston, Drakewalls & St Anns Chapel - also with CC St Dennis (potential cluster with Whitemoor)C KilkhamptonC Rock/Tredrizzick (potential cluster with Polzeath/Trebetherick & St Minver)C St Day (potential cluster with Carharrack)C DelaboleC Mount HawkeC Kingsand/CawsandC BoscastleC ConstantineC Gerrans/PortscathoC St Merryn/Shop (potential cluster with Constantine Bay)C StithiansC St BrewardC HeamoorC LannerC Mawnan SmithC Pendeen (could be clustered with Trewellard)C Mylor/Mylor Bridge (potential cluster with Flushing)C Tregony

D St ErthD TroonD ProbusD St MawesD Bugle (could be clustered with Stenalees, Penwithick, Trethurgy, Carthew & Ruddlemoor)D Four LanesD MenheniotD St Newlyn EastD Albaston, Drakewalls & St Anns Chapel (could potentially be clustered with Gunnislake - also with C

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

One Score One Score One Score One Score Others Score One Score 2 2 1 2 twenty six 26 0 33 401.5 2 2 1 2 fourteen 14 0 21 316 2 2 1 2 two 2 0 9 269.5 2 2 0 2 eight 8 0 14 247.5 2 2 0 2 nine 9 0 15 221.5 2 2 0 2 two 2 0 8 205.5 2 2 0 2 four 4 0 10 195

2 2 0 2 six 6 0 12 190 2 2 1 2 five 5 0 12 181 2 2 0 2 four 4 0 10 177 0 2 1 2 four 4 0 9 159.5 2 2 1 2 0 0 7 146.5 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 135.5 2 2 0 2 0 0 6 128 0 2 0 2 two 2 0 6 122.5

0 2 0 2 four 4 0 8 119 0 2 1 2 0 0 5 112 0 2 1 2 four 6 0 11 108.5 0 2 0 2 one 1 0 5 93 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 91 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 90.5 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 89.5 0 2 0 2 one 1 0 5 85 0 2 0 2 one 1 0 5 77 0 2 0 2 two 2 2 8 74.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 71.5 0 0 1 2 two 2 0 5 70.5 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 68.5 0 2 0 2 one 1 0 5 67 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 66.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 66 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 66 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 65 0 0 1 2 three 3 0 6 64 0 0 1 2 two 2 0 5 63.5 0 0 1 2 two 2 0 5 61.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 59 0 2 0 2 two 2 0 6 59 0 0 1 2 two 2 0 5 58.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 58.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 56.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 56 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 55 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 54.5 0 0 1 2 two 2 0 5 54 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 53.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 53 0 0 1 2 one 1 2 6 53 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 53 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 53 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 52.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 52.5 0 0 1 2 three 3 0 6 51 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 50.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 50 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 50

0 0 1 2 two 2 0 5 49.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 49.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 49 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 48.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 48 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 47.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 2 6 47.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 47.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 47

Total Score

Place of Worship (half score if combined with another facility)

Other Bus/Rail Service

Low Sustainable Factors

Hospital Library (Permanent) Library (Mobile) Interim

Score

Page 35: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

D Gorran Haven (inc. Gorran Churchtown)D MillbrookD PolperroD Crowlas/Lower LudgvanD St Keverne (potential cluster with Coverack)D Grampound D St GermansD Stoke Climsland/VenterdonD Lanivet/LamorrickD PensilvaD Port Isaac/Port GaverneD SennenD St Buryan (potential cluster with Porthcurno/St Levan)D PelyntD LizardD CubertD St TeathD Perranwell/PerranworthalD TrispenD St TudyD Downderry (could be clustered with Seaton)D Tywardreath (could be a potential cluster with St Austell, St Blazey, Par & Trewoon)D VeryanD Grampound RoadD Foxhole (could be clustered with Nanpean and Treviscoe)D DobwallsD St DominicD St EvalD Connor DownsD GoonhavernD PonsanoothD St MawganD LuxulyanD Calstock (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, HarD Goldsithney clustered with St HilaryD ShortlanesendD Ruan MinorD MabeD Nanpean (could be clustered with Foxhole and Treviscoe)D PolruanD Flushing (potential cluster with Mylor)D Leedstown (potential cluster with Praze an Beeble)D Porthcurno/St Levan (potential cluster with St Buryan)D PortreathD St NeotD LewannickD MouseholeD Altarnun/Five Lanes/TrewintD DuloeD MadronD ManaccanD WhitstoneD BlislandD St MabynD Summercourt (potential cluster with Indian Queens/St Columb Road/Fraddon)D Mawgan & GarrasD South Petherwin

E ChacewaterE Crantock (potential cluster with Newquay)E DevoranE St IsseyE St Kew HighwayE TregadillettE BlackwaterE Shop (Morwenstow)E Tresillian

One Score One Score One Score One Score Others Score One Score

Total Score

Place of Worship (half score if combined with another facility)

Other Bus/Rail Service

Low Sustainable Factors

Hospital Library (Permanent) Library (Mobile) Interim

Score

0 0 1 2 two 2 0 5 47 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 47 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 47 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 46.5 0 2 0 2 one 1 0 5 46.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 45 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 45 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 45 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 44.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 44.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 44.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 44 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 44 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 43.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 43 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 42 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 42 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 41.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 41.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 40.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 40 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 40 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 40 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 40 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 39.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 39 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 39 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 39 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 38.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 38.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 38.5 0 0 1 2 two 2 0 5 38.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 38 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 37.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 37.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 37.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 2 6 37 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 36.5 0 0 1 2 two 2 0 5 36 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 35.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 35 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 35 0 0 0 2 two 2 2 6 35 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 34.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 2 6 34.5 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 34 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 34 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 33.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 33 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 33 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 32 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 32 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 31 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 31 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 31 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 30.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 29.5

0 0 1 0 0 0 1 45 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 40.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 39.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 38.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 38.5 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 38.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 36.5 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 36.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 36.5

Page 36: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

E GweekE Quintrell DownsE Porthtowan (Carrick & Kerrier)E Harrowbarrow (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, ChilsworthyE St Cleer (could be clustered with Commonmoor, Higher Tremar Coombe, Tremar & Tremar CoombeE MarhamchurchE Breage (potential cluster with Ashton)E Gulval/TrevarrackE Polzeath/Trebetherick (potential cluster with Rock/Tredrizzick and St Minver)E Carharrack (potential cluster with St Day)E LandrakeE Praze-an-Beeble (potential cluster with Leedstown)E Long RockE St Just in RoselandE Carnon DownsE Playing PlaceE St Minver (potential cluster with Rock/Tredrizzick and Polzeath/Trebetherick)E Carnhell Green/Wall/ReawlaE CraftholeE Cury (Churchtown and White Cross)E Week St MaryE Trewoon (could cluster with St Austell, St Blazey, Par & Tywardreath)E RosudgeonE LadockE NancledraE EgloskerryE Porkellis (potential cluster with Carnkie/Wendron and Rame)E BoytonE Coverack (potential cluster with St Keverne)E LanliveryE NanstallonE Upton CrossE Germoe (Churchtown and Crossroads)E Lady Cross/YeolmbridgeE Stenalees (could be clustered with Bugle, Penwithick, Trethurgy, Carthew & Ruddlemoor)E Marshgate (potential cluster with Tresparrett)E East TaphouseE Godolphin CrossE Wendron (Churchtown)E St MellionE Whitemoor (potential cluster with St Dennis)E CardinhamE Gwinear/GwithianE Jacobstow (could potentially be clustered with Wainhouse Corner)E LerrynE Petherwin GateE Warbstow CrossE Coads GreenE St Kew E WidegatesE CargreenE Trekenner (potential cluster with Treburley and Lezant)E QuethiockE SithneyE TrewidlandE KehellandE Cusgarne (potential cluster with Frogpool)

F Trenance/Mawgan PorthF Lelant (could cluster with St Ives & Carbis Bay)F Frogpool (potential cluster with Cusgarne)F StickerF TidefordF FeockF Widemouth BayF Pentewan (potential cluster with Mevagissey)F Budock Water

One Score One Score One Score One Score Others Score One Score

Total Score

Place of Worship (half score if combined with another facility)

Other Bus/Rail Service

Low Sustainable Factors

Hospital Library (Permanent) Library (Mobile) Interim

Score

0 0 1 2 0 0 3 36 0 0 0 2 one 1 0 3 36 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 35.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 35 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 35 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 34.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 33.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 33.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 33 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 32 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 32 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 32 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 31.5 0 0 1 2 two 2 0 5 31.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 31 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 31 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 31 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 30.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 30.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 30.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 2 6 30.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 30 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 29.5 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 28.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 28.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 2 6 28 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 27.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 2 6 27 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 26.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 26.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 2 6 26.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 26 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 26 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 25 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 24.5 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 24 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 23.5 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 23.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 23 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 23 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 22.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 22 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 22 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 21 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 20.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 19.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 19 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 2 one 1 2 5 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 8

0 0 1 0 0 0 1 28.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 28 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 26.5 0 0 1 2 one 1 0 4 26.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 26.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 26 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 25.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 24 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 23.5

Page 37: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

F Carnkie (Wendron) (potential cluster with Porkellis and Rame)F Paul/SheffieldF PolgoothF Wainhouse Corner (could potentially be clustered with Jacobstow)F St Ive CrossF ScorrierF Praa SandsF Rame (potential cluster with Carnkie/Wendron and Porkellis)F Penwithick (could potentially be clustered with Bugle, Stenalees, Trethurgy, Carthew/Ruddlemoor)F Ashton (potential cluster with Breage)F Kelly Bray (potential cluster with Callington)F Tresparrett (potential cluster with Marshgate)F Holywell BayF Newtown St Martin (potential cluster with St Martins Green)F BarripperF GwennapF Treviscoe (potential cluster with Foxhole and Nanpean)F Treburley (potential cluster with Trekenner and Lezant)F HessenfordF MitchellF PortloeF St KeyneF Crow's Nest & DariteF Little PetherickF LongdownsF TownshendF Eastern GreenF Metherell (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, HaF PolbathicF Tregurrian/Watergate BayF ZelahF BridgeF CarleenF Commonmoor (could be clustered with St Cleer, Higher Tremar Coombe, Tremar & Tremar CoombeF BolingeyF CremyllF London Apprentice

O Trevone (potential cluster with Padstow)O Higher CrackingtonO LuckettO LanreathO North HillO GrimscottO AntonyO BreaO Carnkie (Redruth)O HelfordO Berepper (Gunwalloe)O Rilla MillO Bangors/Treskinnick CrossO North CountryO PhilleighO Seaton (could be clustered with Downderry)O WilcoveO Chapel AmbleO Rose O Coombe (potential cluster with St Stephen)O MalpasO MithianO North TamertonO PolyphantO PorthallowO RuanlanihorneO NomanslandO PenmarthO Nancegollan

One Score One Score One Score One Score Others Score One Score

Total Score

Place of Worship (half score if combined with another facility)

Other Bus/Rail Service

Low Sustainable Factors

Hospital Library (Permanent) Library (Mobile) Interim

Score

0 0 1 2 0 0 3 23.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 23.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 22.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 22.5 0 0 0 2 one 1 0 3 22 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 20.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 20 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 20 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 19.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 19 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 18.5 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 17 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 16.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 16.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 16 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 15.5 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 12 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11

0 0 1 2 0 0 3 22.5 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 22 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 21 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 19.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 19.5 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 19 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 18 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 17 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 17 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 17 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 16 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 16 0 0 0 2 one 1 0 3 15.5 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 15 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 14.5 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 14 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 14 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 14 0 0 0 2 one 1 2 5 14 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 14 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 14 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 13.5 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 13.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 13

Page 38: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

O PillatonO PorthcothanO MinionsO PhillackO Botus FlemingO Constantine Bay (potential cluster with St Merryn/Shop)O GolantO HattO TresmeerO WithielO GolberdonO RumfordO St JohnO St Martins Green (potential cluster with Newtown St Martins)O TrelightsO Trewellard (could be clustered with Pendeen)O St Michael PenkevilO TrethowelO Whitecross (Wadebridge)O TrevelmondO CadgwithO Chilsworthy (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Calstock, HarO HelstoneO KuggarO LawhittonO Lezant (potential cluster with Treburley and Trekenner)O PorthoustockO PorthpeanO RoseannonO SheviockO TrewennackO HerodsfootO PendoggettO TrebullettO TrevervaO CrowntownO Higher Tremar Coombe (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar & Tremar CoombeO LinkinhorneO MerrymeetO PolkerrisO Rising SunO TrevarrianO CrowanO MountO Port NavasO Tremar (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar Coombe & Higher Tremar CoombeO TrerulefootO TwelveheadsO PorthollandO BodinnickO CarkeelO ForderO PortwrinkleO TrematonO TrethurgyO BethanyO Carthew/Ruddlemoor (could potentially be clustered with Bugle, Stenalees, Penwithick & Trethurgy)O Latchley (potential cluster with Gunnislake, Albaston, St Anns Chapel, Drakewalls, Chilsworthy, HarO PenpondsO Daws HouseO HenwoodO LongstoneO LowertownO PolmassickO Stepaside/HillsideO Tremar Coombe (could be clustered with St Cleer, Commonmoor, Tremar & Higher Tremar Coombe

One Score One Score One Score One Score Others Score One Score

Total Score

Place of Worship (half score if combined with another facility)

Other Bus/Rail Service

Low Sustainable Factors

Hospital Library (Permanent) Library (Mobile) Interim

Score

0 0 0 2 0 2 4 13 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 13 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 12.5 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 12.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 12 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 12 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 12 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 12 0 0 1 2 one 1 2 6 12 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 11 0 0 0 2 one 1 0 3 11 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 9.5 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 9 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 9 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 9 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 9 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 9 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 8 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

Page 39: Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 … · 1 Settlements: Hierarchy and Settlement Categories: 2012 Update Summary A methodology is proposed to: Assist the authority

Sustainability Matrix Appendix 2

Prop

osed

C

ateg

ory

Settlement

O BissoeO Trehan

One Score One Score One Score One Score Others Score One Score

Total Score

Place of Worship (half score if combined with another facility)

Other Bus/Rail Service

Low Sustainable Factors

Hospital Library (Permanent) Library (Mobile) Interim

Score

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2