Upload
yuri-thompson
View
28
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Sexual Selection. differences among indivs in mating opportunity. NS: who SURVIVES SS: who REPRODUCES SS can explain some deleterious/costly characteristics that can’t be explained by NS Ornaments/Courtship Displays/Fights Sexual Dimorphism. Competition (usually M ) Sperm is cheap - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Sexual Selection
• NS: who SURVIVES
• SS: who REPRODUCES
• SS can explain some deleterious/costly characteristics that can’t be explained by NS
Ornaments/Courtship Displays/Fights
Sexual Dimorphism
differences among indivs in mating opportunity
Types of Sexual Selection
Competition (usually M)• Sperm is cheap RS with # of matings
Choice (usually F)• Eggs are expensive• No Δ in RS with # of
matings
# offspring
# mates
e.g. Newts
Sexual Selection depends on Investment
• Higher investment = limited resource Usually Indiscriminate M & Choosy F
But, Sex role reversal/ biparental care/nuptial gifts
Male-male competition
1) COMBAT
• Competition for access to F or territory
• Correlation b/w dominance rank & # of matings
• Size often important in competition
(Sexual Size Dimorphism ~ Degree of Polygyny)
e.g. 2: Male marine iguanas larger than optimal for survival
e.g. 1: Elephant Seals
2) Sperm competitionFertilization more important
than mating
1) Large ejaculate/lots of sperm
2) Mate guarding
3) Copulatory plugs
4) Sperm removal
Comparative method: relative testis size often correlates to mating system
e.g. Primates 200 kg: 30 g
45 kg: 110g 70 kg:40g
3) Infanticide
• Males increase repro opportunities
• Not good for female• Often female has no
choice
• e.g. Lions
Female Choice – Benefits?On Basis of Resources vs. In Absence of Resources
e.g. Scorpionflies
“making males pay”
Nuptial gift:
arthropod –
salivary –
forced copulation
Polygyny Threshold
e.g. Lark Bunting
• choose on the
basis of M territory
• Fitness benefits
1 1 2 32 1 23 1 2 34 1 25 1 26 1 27 1 28 1 29 1
10 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
mal
e te
rrito
ry q
ualit
y ra
nked
acc
ordi
ng to
sha
de
day of female arrival
Direct Benefit
F may choose on the basis of :
gift, paternal care, territory
If no M investment, how do F choose?
Non-resource based Female Choice
• Mutant F with no preference for showy M
• non-showy M offspring survive better
• M offspring not preferred as mates
survival benefit must > repro benefit
The ‘Runaway’ Process
• SS trait associated with higher survival• Mutant F (preference) = RS b/c high quality sons• 2 advantage: M with trait preferred by high
proportion of pop’n as mutation spreads• Reinforcement• Offspring carry genes for trait & preference (linkage
disequilibrium)Advantage:
Survival Survival + Mating Mating
Honest Advertisement
• F preference for traits which
demonstrate good quality
• Zahavi – Handicap Principle– Characters that reduce survival– “I must be good to pull this off” (good genes)– Indicator must be costly so M can’t cheat– Often cost of trait is less for high quality males
Runaway vs. Good Genes
• Open-ended • Heritable variation in
male character• SS b/c sons have
mating advantage
• Open-ended• Heritable variation in
male fitness• SS b/c sons have
survival advantage