Upload
tambre
View
210
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Shaping Argument: 4 Ways. Classical Oration Induction Deduction Toulmin Model. Shape: the organization or the arrangement Shape should fit the ideas…don’t force it. The Rhetorical Triangle. Exigence : an issue, problem, or situation that causes or prompts someone to write or speak . . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Shaping Argument: 4 Ways
1)Classical Oration
2) Induction
3)Deduction
4)Toulmin Model
Shape:• the organization or
the arrangement
• Shape should fit the ideas…don’t force it
The Rhetorical Triangle
Speaker =
Subject = LogosPathos: Audience
Ethos
Rhetorical
Context
Exigence:an issue, problem, or situation that
causes or prompts someone to write
or speak.
Classical Oration: 5 part structureTerm Latin Term FunctionIntroduction Exordium • Introduces the reader to the
subject• Gets attention• Establishes Ethos
Narration Narratio • Provides facts and background info
• Est. why the subject is a problem & needs to be addressed
• Appeals to pathos (& logos)Confirmation Confirmatio • Includes the development
and proof • Specific & concrete details• Appeal to Logos
Classical Oration: 5 part structureTerm Latin Term FunctionRefutation Refutatio • Addresses the counter
• Bridge between the proof and the conclusion
• Appeal to Logos• Can come as the 2nd para.
Conclusion Peroratio • Brings the essay to a close• Appeals to pathos• Reminds reader of Ethos• Brings all the ideas together• Answers the question, So
what?• Last words…audience will
remember
“Not by Math Alone” (O’Connor & Romer, 2006)
1) Read the essay - together2) Label the parts (classical oration) –together3) Answer questions – on own
The Rhetorical Triangle
Speaker =
Subject = LogosPathos: Audience
Ethos
Rhetorical
Context
Exigence:an issue, problem, or situation that
causes or prompts someone to write
or speak.
Shaping Argument: 4 Ways
1)Classical Oration
2) Induction
3)Deduction
4)Toulmin Model
Shape:• the organization or
the arrangement
• Shape should fit the ideas…don’t force it
Shaping Argument: InductionTerm Latin Term Function
Induction Inducere (to lead into) • Arrange an argument so it leads from the particulars to the universals
• Uses specific cases to draw a conclusion
• Collects evidence and drawing an inference based on the evidence to make a conclusion
Example: Regular exercise promotes weight loss.
Exercise lowers stress levels.
Exercise improves mood and outlook.
Generalization: Exercise contributes to better health.
Shaping Argument: InductionTerm Latin Term Function
Induction Inducere (to lead into) • Arrange an argument so it leads from the particulars to the universals
• Uses specific cases to draw a conclusion
• Collects evidence and drawing an inference based on the evidence to make a conclusion
Examples When Used: * Scientific Method* Essay supported by reasons* Car buying
One more thing: • Not “true or false” arg.,
but…• “weak or strong”• Consider exceptions to the
rules…vulnerabilities• Cannot lead to certainty,
only probability
“from Outliers” (Malcolm Gladwell)
1) Read the essay - together2) Dissect according to induction
Shaping Argument: DeductionTerm Function
Deduction
(Syllogism: logical structure that uses major and minor premise to reach a necessary conclusion)
• Reach a conclusion by starting with a general principle or universal truth (a major premise)
• Apply the principle to specific case (minor premise)
Example:
Major Premise: Exercise contributes to better health.
Minor Premise: Yoga is a type of exercise.
Conclusion: Yoga contributes to better health.
Shaping Argument: DeductionTerm Function
Deduction
(Syllogism: logical structure that uses major and minor premise to reach a necessary conclusion)
• Reach a conclusion by starting with a general principle or universal truth (a major premise)
• Apply the principle to specific case (minor premise)
Example:
Major Premise: Celebrities are role models for young people.
Minor Premise: Lindsey Lohan is a celebrity
Conclusion: Lindsey Lohan is a role model for young people.
Note: Strength: if first 2 premises are true = conclusion is logically validWeakness: if either premise is false = conclusion can be challenged
“The Declaration of Independence” (Thomas Jefferson)Example of combo of both INDUCTION & DEDUCTION
1) Read the primary source - together2) Dissect according to induction & induction
The argument of the entire document can be distilled into this syllogism:
Major Premise:
Minor Premise:
Conclusion:
“The Declaration of Independence” (Thomas Jefferson)Example of combo of both INDUCTION & DEDUCTION
1) Read the primary source - together2) Dissect according to induction & induction
The argument of the entire document can be distilled into this syllogism:
Major Premise: Citizens have a right to rebel against a despot.
Minor Premise: King George III is a despot.
Conclusion: Citizens have a right to rebel against King George III
How does Jefferson PROOVE the minor premise?
The Toulmin Model: 6 ElementsTerm FunctionClaim • Arguable assertions
• Conclusion whose merit we are seeking to establish
Support (evidence) • First hand or second hand “proof”
Warrant (assumption) • Expresses the assumption shared by the speaker and the audience
• Links the claim to the evidence• Similar to the minor premise
Backing • Further assurances or data• Without, the assumption lacks authority
Qualifier • “tempers” the claim; makes it less absolute• EX: usually, maybe, probably, most likely…
Reservation • Explains the terms and conditions necessitated by the qualifier
The Toulmin Model: 6 Elements
Evidence
Assumption
Backing
Qualifier Reservation
Claim
Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation).
The Toulmin Model: 6 Elements
Evidence:(it is raining)
Assumption(an umbrella will keep me dry)
Backing(the material is waterproof)
Qualifier(probably)
Reservation(unless it has a hole in it)
Claim(I should take my umbrella)
Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation).
The Toulmin Model: 6 ElementsThink-Pair-Share
Evidence
Assumption
Backing
Qualifier Reservation
Claim
Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation).
The Toulmin Model: 6 ElementsThink-Pair-Share
1) Grades should be abolished because they add stress to the
learning experience.1)Identify the assumption that would link the claim to
its support.2)Use the format:Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation).
The Toulmin Model: 6 ElementsThink-Pair-Share
2) Until you buy me a diamond, I won’t know that you
love me!1)Identify the assumption that would link the claim to
its support.2)Use the format:Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation).
The Toulmin Model: 6 ElementsThink-Pair-Share
3) If we want to decrease gang violence, we should legalize
drugs.1)Identify the assumption that would link the claim to
its support.2)Use the format:Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation).
The Toulmin Model: 6 ElementsThink-Pair-Share
4) You must obey her because she is your mother.
1)Identify the assumption that would link the claim to its support.
2)Use the format:Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation).
The Toulmin Model: 6 ElementsThink-Pair-Share
5) Wifi should be available to everyone without cost since the Internet has
become a vital part of our lives.
1)Identify the assumption that would link the claim to its support.
2)Use the format:Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (assumption), on account of (backing), unless (reservation).
Vocab 4:2 Quiz…Prefix Meaning
De Opposite, away, from
Dis, Dif, Di Apart, not
Epi Upon, on top
Equi Equal
Ex, E Out, From, Forth