10
Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: the limited effect of a false cue Adam Sparks, Pat Barclay Shefali Garg(11678) Smith Gupta(11720)

Shefali Garg(11678) Smith Gupta(11720)

  • Upload
    eben

  • View
    64

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: the limited effect of a false cue Adam Sparks, Pat Barclay. Shefali Garg(11678) Smith Gupta(11720). Background. Cooperation increases as anonymity decreases. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Shefali Garg(11678) Smith  Gupta(11720)

Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: the limited effect of a false cue

Adam Sparks, Pat Barclay

Shefali Garg(11678)Smith Gupta(11720)

Page 2: Shefali Garg(11678) Smith  Gupta(11720)

Background Cooperation increases as anonymity decreases. Humans have neural circuitry that automatically activates

in response to both real and pictured faces. Human decision-making influenced not only by

conscious, reasoned evaluation of explicit knowledge, but also by non-conscious, intuitive judgments based on implicit cues.

How long does it last?Does it always work?

Page 3: Shefali Garg(11678) Smith  Gupta(11720)

Importance Helps resolve discrepancies about whether and when

eye images influence cooperation People habituate to an uninformative reputation cue Informs efforts to use reputational cues to promote

cooperation in real world or research settings

Page 4: Shefali Garg(11678) Smith  Gupta(11720)

Experiment: Is the Eyes Effect sensitive to exposure length?

Page 5: Shefali Garg(11678) Smith  Gupta(11720)
Page 6: Shefali Garg(11678) Smith  Gupta(11720)
Page 7: Shefali Garg(11678) Smith  Gupta(11720)
Page 8: Shefali Garg(11678) Smith  Gupta(11720)

Conclusions The eyes effect is an involuntary, subconscious

response. Significant effect of exposure length on giving. More effective if few real observers will be present. No observed effect on autistic people. Effect on giving to in-group, not out-group.

Page 9: Shefali Garg(11678) Smith  Gupta(11720)

References Barclay, P. (2011b). The evolution of charitable behaviour and the power of reputation. In C. Roberts (Ed.), Applied evolutionary psychology

(pp. 149–172). New York: Oxford University Press. Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2004). Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fund-raising. Journal of Public Economics,

88, 1605–1623. Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and

Human Behaviour, 26, 245–256, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.002. Blest, A. D. (1957). The function of eyespot patterns in the Lepidoptera. Behaviour, 11, 209–256. Sparks, A. Subtle cues and economic games. MSc [thesis]. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University; 2010. Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412–

414, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509. Barclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological

Sciences, 274, 749–753, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0209. DeBruine, L. M. (2002). Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1307–1312,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb. 2002.2034. Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., & Yamagishi, T. (2010). Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism. Evolution and Human

Behavior, 31, 109–117, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.004. Oda, R., Niwa, Y., Honma, A., & Hiraishi, K. (2011). An eye-like painting enhances the expectation of a good reputation. Evolution and

Human Behavior, 32, 166–171, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.11.002.

Page 10: Shefali Garg(11678) Smith  Gupta(11720)

Thank You