Upload
hadat
View
224
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
0
Ship to Ship OperationsLiabilities – Risk Assessment – Case Study
The onlineSTS.net ConceptINTERTANKO European Panel Meeting 9/10/2014
1
2
3
1.VESSEL NOMINATION2.VESSEL ACCEPTANCE3.QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SERVICE PROVIDER4.RISK ASSESSMENT5.COMMENCEMENT OF STS OPERATION
A. APPROACHINGB. MOORINGC. CARGO TRANSFERD. PAPER WORK – BOL-FACT SHEETE. UNMOORING
6.POST EVALUATION (POST ASSESSMENT)
4
Who has a contract with whom ??
A Discharging Ship A Receiving ShipA Service Provider
5
Where is the Contract ???
A Discharging Ship A Receiving ShipA Service Provider
Charterer/ Cargo Owner
6
So, how safe STS Operations be ensured ?
A Discharging Ship A Receiving ShipA Service Provider
7
A safe STS Operation does not rely on a contract, but on DUE DILIGENCE
……………DUE DILIGENCE requires:
• Expertise-Experience• Information resources• Past STS Record Assessments• Understanding of Liabilities, Exposures• Supporting Reputation and Risk Mitigating issues
So, how safe STS Operations be ensured ?
8
9
1. Right to review the details....2. Decision on suitability...3. Proper and detailed planning...
1. DUE DILIGENCE from the TANKER OPERATOR
2. Provision of tools and information to the Master
3. Assessment of Safety issues
Due Diligence in STS Operations is:• easy to be described, • difficult to be recorded and • challenging to provide proof that is being followed.
10
DESIGNING THE CONCEPT
Latest OCIMF Guidelines
IMO MARPOLChapter 8 of Annex I
ISM & TMSA
Charter PartySTS Clauses
P&I and H&M
11
What is the problem ??
1. Limited expertise in STS due diligence practices;
2. Limited risk estimation data3. Time constrain for decision making4. Excessive administration burden
12
And what is your proposed
solution ??
1. Adopt SCREENING POLICIES2. Screen the SERVICE PROVIDER and POAC3. Assess the STS RECORDS4. Share your Experience5. Use your STS KNOWLEDGE during the
CLEARANCE Phase
13
Clearance Request
Examination of available records.
VESSEL SUITABILITY
Clearance Reply
COMMITMENT WITH THE STS
Charterer Tanker Operator
Examination of available records.
VESSEL SUITABILITY
Screening Policies
1. Standard & justified procedure
2. Access to information resources
3. Access to available past STS records
14
Proper and Detailed Planning
Risk Mitigating Measures
Service Provider
ASSESSMENT PHASE
Joint Plan of the STS
Risk Hazards
STS Location
Tanker Operator
Service Provider
ASSESSMENT PHASE
Joint Plan of the STS
Risk Hazards
STS Location Risk Mitigating Measures
15
Proper and Detailed Planning
Tanker Operator’s task
Service Provider
ASSESSMENT PHASE
Joint Plan of the STS
Risk Hazards
STS Location
16
Proper and Detailed Planning
Tanker Operator’s task
Service Provider
ASSESSMENT PHASE
Joint Plan of the STS
Risk Hazards
STS Location
• The risk assessment should encounter all identified hazards.
• Consolidated past performance data should be taken into account.
17
Proper and Detailed Planning
Tanker Operator’s task
Service Provider
ASSESSMENT PHASE
Joint Plan of the STS
Risk Hazards
STS Location• The STS location assessment should consider:
• Weather data;• Past Service Provider performance;• Reported Incidents;• Performance of STBL or Receiving
vessels.• Other restrictions
18
Proper and Detailed Planning
Tanker Operator’s task
Service Provider
ASSESSMENT PHASE
Joint Plan of the STS
Risk Hazards
STS Location• The Joint Plan prepared by the Service
Provider should be assessed by the Master for compliance according to latest OCIMF guidelines and STS PLAN.
19
Proper and Detailed Planning
Tanker Operator’s task
Service Provider
ASSESSMENT PHASE
Joint Plan of the STS
Risk Hazards
STS Location
• The Service provider should be assessed with respect to Safety, reliability and efficiency.
• STS Equipment (Fenders – Hoses) Characteristics and Maintenance Certificates should be requested from the provider and be assessed.
20
STS OPERATION
Service ProviderTanker Operator
21
Records Assessment of Records
KPI’s
Statistics
Lessons Learned
STS Experience becomes an asset to
the Operator
Tanker Operator
22
Clearance Request
Examination of available records.
VESSEL SUITABILITY
Clearance Reply
COMMITMENT WITH THE STS
Proper and Detailed Planning
Risk Mitigating Measures
STS OPERATION
Records Assessment of Records
KPI’s
Statistics
Lessons Learned
STS Experience becomes an asset to
the Operator
Service Provider
ASSESSMENT PHASE
Joint Plan of the STS
Risk Hazards
STS Location
Examination of available records.
VESSEL SUITABILITY
Service Provider
ASSESSMENT PHASE
Joint Plan of the STS
Risk Hazards
STS Location Risk Mitigating Measures
Assessment of Records
STS Experience becomes an asset to
the Operator
23
Clearance Phase
Proper & Detailed Planning
STS Operation
Assessment of Records
STS Experience
Tanker Operator 1
Clearance Phase
Proper & Detailed Planning
• Due Diligence Procedures
24
Clearance Phase
Proper & Detailed Planning
STS Operation
Assessment of Records
STS Experience
Tanker Operator 1
Clearance Phase
Proper & Detailed Planning
Clearance Phase
Proper & Detailed Planning
STS Operation
Assessment of Records
STS Experience
Tanker Operator 2
Clearance Phase
Proper & Detailed Planning
Clearance Phase
Proper & Detailed Planning
STS Operation
Assessment of Records
STS Experience
Tanker Operator 3
Clearance Phase
Proper & Detailed Planning
25
Assessment of Records
STS Experience
Tanker Operator 1
Assessment of Records
STS Experience
Tanker Operator 2
Assessment of Records
STS Experience
Tanker Operator 3
Performance of Vessels POAC Assessment STS EquipmentAssessment
Location Assessment
SHARE OF INFORMATION - DUE DILIGENCE
26
SHARE OF INFORMATION - DUE DILIGENCE
27
SHARE OF INFORMATION - DUE DILIGENCE
Assessments
1. 464 Individual POAC2. 98 Different Locations3. 62 Service Providers4. 421 Individual Tanker
Operators5. 1556 Individual Vessel
Performance
28
SHARE OF INFORMATION - DUE DILIGENCE
29
Safeguards and barriers in place, are in line with anti-trust and anti-corruption requirements in order
to ensure that sensitive information is not compromised.
30
Clearance Phase
Proper & Detailed Planning
STS Operation
Assessment of Records
STS Experience
Tanker Operator
Clearance Phase
Proper & Detailed Planning
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
31
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
32
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
123
4
33
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
34
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
35
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
36
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
37
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
38
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
39
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
40
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
41
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
42
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
43
Screening Report – PART - A
Assessment of STS Elements – PART - B
24 x 7 support to the Master
OSIS – Record Keeping
OSIS – Consolidated Knowledge
Becomes a member
44
COMPANY LOCATIONALMI TANKERS SA GREECEANDRIAKI SHIPPING CO LTD GREECEAMPTC CO EGYPT-KUWAITARCADIA SHIP MANAGEMENT CO LTD GREECEATHENIAN SEA CARRIERS LTD GREECEBERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT (DE) GMBH GERMANYBERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT CY CYPRUSBERNHARD SCHULTE SHIPMANAGEMENT UK UKENESEL SA GREECEEURONAV SHIP MANAGEMENT (HELLAS) LTD GREECEEURONAV SHIP MANAGEMENT SAS BELGIUMGRACE MANAGEMENT SA GREECEIONIA MANAGEMENT SA GREECEMARAN TANKERS MANAGEMENT INC GREECEMARE MARITIME CO SA GREECEMEDCARE SHIPPING SA GREECENAVIOS TANKER MANAGEMENT INC GREECERHL HAMBURGER LLOYD TANKER GMBH CO KG GERMANYTHENAMARIS (SHIPS MANAGEMENT) INC GREECETMS TANKERS GREECETSAKOS COLUMBIA SHIP MANAGEMENT SA GREECEWESTERN SHIPPING PTE LTD SINGAPORE
45
Constant Heading Vessel
ManeuveringVessel
46
Constant Heading Vessel
ManeuveringVessel
47
Constant Heading Vessel
ManeuveringVessel
48
Constant Heading Vessel
ManeuveringVessel
An obvious observation is that the responsibility lays with the maneuvering vessel rather the constant heading vessel. Although the case was considered to end in favor of the constant heading vessel, a close examination of both Masters’ responsibilities as per OCIMF guidelines altered the course from the initial case settlement, probably ending as a knock-for-knock.
49
Constant Heading Vessel
ManeuveringVessel
WHAT WENT WRONGThe primary pennant fender rope broke during the initial contact (Figure 1) ending in dislocation for fenders. No backup pennant fender rope existed. The condition and type of the forward pennant fender rope was not according to manufacturer requirements, thus not as per ISO 17357:2002.Although secondary fenders were fitted those did not prevent the collision.
50
Constant Heading Vessel
ManeuveringVessel
WHAT WENT WRONGThe primary pennant fender rope broke during the initial contact (Figure 1) ending in dislocation for fenders. No backup pennant fender rope existed. The condition and type of the forward pennant fender rope was not according to manufacturer requirements, thus not as per ISO 17357:2002.Although secondary fenders were fitted those did not prevent the collision.
51
Constant Heading Vessel
ManeuveringVessel
FAILURE TO MEET OCIMF GUIDELINES
According to OCIMF guidelines the following should have taken place:1. A joint plan should have taken place prior the STS operation as per paragraph 5.2 of OCIMF
guidelines.2. Both Masters should have requested certificates of fenders, hoses and also the qualification of the
POAC according to paragraph 2.5 and 9.1.3 of OCIMF3. In case the rigging of the fenders was not as per OCIMF guidelines, then the operation should not
started.
52
Constant Heading Vessel
ManeuveringVessel
WHAT (IF) ??
According to OCIMF guidelines the following would have taken place:1. A joint plan would have taken place prior the STS operation as per paragraph 5.2 of OCIMF
guidelines.2. Our Master would have requested certificates of fenders, hoses and also the qualification of the
POAC according to paragraph 2.5 and 9.1.3 of OCIMF3. In case the rigging of the fenders was not as per OCIMF guidelines, then the operation would not
have started.4. Most likely past performance data for vessel and service provider would provide an indication.
53
JUSTIFY YOUR DECISIONS,
FOCUS ON THE STS OPERATION,
SUPPORT YOUR REPUTATION
www.onlinests.net,