ShlokaVarttika of Sri Kumarila Bhatta-----A Classic From the Purva Mimamsa School of Thought

  • Upload
    vedvid

  • View
    227

  • Download
    10

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Sri Kumarila Bhatta, one of the greatest masters of the Purva Mimamsa school, or the Karma Mimamsa as it should be properly termed (As the name Purva was given by the Uttara Mimamsa Vadins or the Vedantins who were established later), wrote this ShlokaVarttika as a commentary on the Karma Kanda or the Vedas. Jaimini wrote Mimamsa sutras as part of the program to systematize the principles of ritual in the Vedic scriptures. This and Shabara Swamin's commenntary on the Sutras (Shabara Bhashyam) developed a philosophy of ritual. But the beauty of Purva Mimamsa si that, its leading thinkers were quite independent of one another. Kumarila Bhatta openly contradicted Shabara in several areas and Kumarila's contemporary, Sri Prabhakara, in turn raised objections against Kumarila and eventually created a school of thought named after him. As a tribute to Purva-Mimamsa, the translation of this magnificent ShlokaVarttika by Ganganatha Jha is made available here. Enjoy!

Citation preview

'WH,vWi,^^V

**smi

^M^\P'm?

k^md'^jcfANA^^"^'

%Ud, %Mf^

""Wm^hV,M:^^'*^>^^^-^tfiiMa^T^^V^^Uiu^:^V;

.^^%.'^^^Wvwu^,,-.liA

^^^'

^y^Vis^^V

,uy\;u ,yVV\jV\)\;>'

;^ViOvvivju w-::^^^

^^;^

r^VN'^I:iJVv-,^y.M

-^Mvi^

yv^^vw^^:,^ >..>^vlvviVC^i^^ir^

V^W^rV

,..:,^^,;^^^^.i^^i*^V^^^^'yv;|^^V

:^:,..,HVW^

fyxmll Hmvejjsitg JitatgTHEGIFT

OF

G.^Aajiatut. Sscjcotu.

\.'ho^ziA.\

3qJx4is7583

Cornell University Library

PK 2971.B588K96lokavarttika/

3 1924 022 991

818

Cornell University Library

Thetine

original of

tiiis

book

is in

Cornell University Library.

There are no known copyright

restrictions intext.

the United States on the use of the

http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924022991818

:

.

BIBLIOTHECA INBICAA

COLLECTION OP ORIENTAL WORKSPUBLISHED BY THK

ASIATIC SOCIETY OF BENGAL.NewSeries, Nos. 965, 986, 1017, 1055, 1091 and 1157

GLOKAYARTTIKA?

TRANSLATED FROM THE ORIGINAL SANSKRIT WITH KXTRACTS PHOM THE COMMENTARIES OF SUCARITA MISKA (THE Easikfl) AND PARTHA SARATHI Ml^RA (the Nyuyaratnokara)

SIR-WILUAMJONES

MDCCXLVl -MDCCXCIVBY

GAISGANATHA JHl,

M.A.,

PROFESSOR OF SANSKRIT, MUIR CENTRAL COLLEGE, ALLAHABAD.

CALCUTTA:PRINTED AT THE BAPTIST MISSION PRESS

AND PUBLISHED BY THEASIATIC SOCIETY, 57, PARK STREET.

1907.

qLOKAVAETIKA.

The theory of the extraneous character The theory refuted (47) ...

of authoritativeuess (38)......

...

...

.......

Notion of unauthoritativeness due to extraneous influences (53) ... Three forms of unauthoritativeness (54) ... ...unauthoritativeneas (65-66)

27 28 292931 31

Exoellenoeg of the source of words only serve to set aside the chances of...

...

...

...

... Absence of an Author safeguards the Veda against all reproach (68) Only human assertions dependent upon other Pramdnas (71) ... ... The authoritativeness of Pramdnas does not lie in their compatiblity with one another (73) ... ... ... ... ...

32

3233

The

falsity of

a Conception explained (86)

......

..

......

Inference not applicable to Veda (89) ... Undisputed authority of the Veda (95-96)

...

3435 35

......

...... ... ...

...... ...

Veda not due

to

human

origin (97-98)

...

Falsity due to non-productiveness of conceptions (101-102)

36 36.37

'Pratyayita' explained (102-103)' '

...

...

....

Force of the word Fo (109-10) ... ... ... ... No omniscient person (111) ... ... ... ... ... Inference and Sense-perception not applicable to objects in the future (115) Veda not the work of an Omniscient Author (120) ... ... ...Scriptures composed by

38 38

39 3941

human

beings not fully authoritative (122)

... ...

No grounds

for

assuming the existence of an omniscient person (132)itself......

The character of the Veda Omniscient Author (149)'

does not lend support to the theory of an......

43...

Absurdity incurred in denying the authority of the Veda (154) The sentence J/amtiamiJttsham,' ^c, explained (155)'

... ...

43

...

44413

The Buddhistic Scriptures false, because composed by human beings The sentence Nanu sdmanyatodrshtam, Sfe.! explained (174-75) '2fo,'

(169)...

4647

Na

anyatwat' explained (175) ... hi anyasya, ^c, expUined (181-82)

...

43 48

Arguments'

in support of the authenticity of thei^'c,

Veda......

(184)

......

Pratyakshastu,

explained (187)

...'

49 49 505^ 51(200)......

Full signification of the

word Dharma'

(190)...

...

Other meanings refuted (195-96)

...

No

ilpMnja apart from a potentiality of the Sacrifice (197) ... Objections based upon the significance of the word Oodand' (201) Reply to these Oodand cannot be restricted to positive activity only' :

5354.

Cadand refers

Two

to Injunctions as well as Prohibitions (215-16) kinds of consequences following from Saoiifloes (a21 -22)

... ...

54 575-

Action not prohibited cannot be sinful (232-33) ... ... __ Result not always similnr to the Action (235-36) ... ... .__ Vedio Injunctions and Prohibitions tlie only means of knowing Dliarma and

Adharma'

(242-43)

...

...

...... ...

".^_

jq

Utilitarian theory of Virtue not tenable (246-47)

...

59t-q

Nor the Conscience theory'

(247-48)

...

Sacrificial Slaughter not sinful (259)'

...

,.,

gi.

Oyena

'

sacrifice sinful,

because resulting in the death of a person (267)... ...

...

62gi

Interpretation of the SMt)-a justified (277-78)

CONTENTS.Page.

Sutra IIIDeclaration of the subject-matter...

...

... ...

...

67 67

Declaration of the subject-matter of the Treatise (1-2)

,,.

Sutra

IV -

Sense-perception not the means of knowing Dharma ... ... ...68-112 The Sutra cannot he taken aa embodying a definition of Sense-peroep*' (1) ... ... ... ... ... 68

Change

of reading proposed.

by the...

Vrtti,

with a view to make,,,

it__

a regnlar,

definition (13)

.

___

Trae meaning

of the SUtra (20)

...

.........

...

...... ...

gg 7073 73 74 74

Sense-perception not applicable to D?ia?-?na (36) Necessity of the word sat (36) ...'

.........

'

The

particle

'sam' (38-39)

...

...

... ......

......

Functioning of the senses explained (44),.. The words purusha' and indriya' (52) ... Buddhijanma,' (53-54,) ... ..'

...... ......

'

...

76

'

...

......

Why

Sense-perception

is

not applicable to Dharma(59)......

76 77 80 82 8485 85 86

Self-recognition not the true result of Pramana (79) Inference, &a., preceded by Sense-perception (87)

... ...

...

... ......

Inference not applicable to Dharma (99)

...

.........

Analogy (IQO) ... ,, Apparent Inconsistency not applicable to P/ianna (101-102) Veda the only means of knowing D/inrma (108) ... Inference is based upon Sense-perception (111) ... Yedanta theory oontroYerted (114-116) ...Abstract perception of an object (118-19) How made Concrete (120) ... I) Cognition of Class cannot be inferential (138)... ...

... ......

......

8787 88 88

...

......

...... ...

...

.........

......

92 94 96 98 98 9899

Samavaya (148) ... ... Mixed functioning of varions sense-organs (159) The numbers of Senses only Five (169) .... .

...

......

......

...

Exclusive objects of the Sense-organs differentiated (170) ... ... Cognition of objects not in the form of identification with their verbal expressions (172) ... ... ... .. ...

Cognition of objects independent of verbal expressions (176) The class cow not cognised always in the form of the word' '

...'

...'

cow

(180)......

100100101

Apparent identity

of the

Word, the Idea, and the Object

explaine.i (183)

Imposition of the form of the word on the object is impossible (183) ... Words not independent of the material forma of objects (193) ... ... In the expression blue lotus,' there can be no absolute non-difference'

102103

between a particular blueness and a particular lotus (197) ... Another reason against the imposition of the forms of wordsobjects (200)... ......

...

upon......

...

...

104105 105

Until the object is known, the Word cannot give any idea of Objects do not depend upon words (205) ... ...

it

C203)...

...

9L0KAVAETIKA.Page.It is the

form of the object thatit

is

cognised throngh the Word, which cannot...

suppressIf verbal

(206)

...

...

'

1^

forms were imposed upon words, the meaning of the word ... would differ from that of the word ftara (203) ... The Imposition theory would falsify all Inference and Verbal' '

hasta...

105 106 106 106

Testi... .....

mony

(213)

.,.

...

...

...

... ...

The form of the Object not dependent upon Word (215) The relationship between Words and Objects is eternal (219)In the case of Proper Names also, the words are eternal particular application that has a beginning in time (224)Conventional restriction explained (228) ... The factors of Memory and Perception explained (230-31):

...

it is......

only their......

108108

DenotatiTenesB of words not always due to Convention (226)

......

109109

...

Sense-perception precisely explained (236-37) ... Cognitions undefined only so long as words are not found (245-46)Itis

"

...

HOIll

the Classes of Objects and their various relationships (as expressed in

inferential arguments) that are

amenable

to Sense-perception,

which would...

not be possible

if

Perceptive Cognition were always undefined (247-48)

Ill

The namedirectly

of 'Sense-perception' applicable to only such cognitions as follow

from Sense-oontaot (255)

...

...

...

...

112

Sutra

v....

Authoritativeness of Injunction

...

...

...

...113-408

Section

1

:

Farttla proper on the Swtra

...

...

...

...112-16...

Dharma

not amenable to any other Means of Knowledge (2) Injunction, the only means of knowing it (8) ...

......

......

113 114115

Necessity of having recourse to Injunction (14)

...

...

Section 2

;

Introduction to the Trtti on the Siitra

...

...

...116-19it

Transposition of the words 'tat' and 'sat' in Siitra (4), tion of Sense-perception (19-20) ... ...

makes...

a defini...

116

Section 3

:

Nirdlambanavdda

...

.........'

......

,.,

...119-48,.,....

Necessity of the Discussion (1-3) Reality of External Objects (4)Pleasures of Heaven not similar toDiversity of opinion

...... ...

ng\ig 120 ]20 120121

...

'SamtirW Reality' synonymous with 'falsity

(8-9)

...

Dreams

(11)

...

...

.... ...

among

various scions of the Bauddhas (14.-16)....,,

Two

kinds of Denial of External Objects (17-18)

CONTENTS.

VPage.

The Idealistic Position Expounded (20-22) ... ... The Reply given hy the Bhishya held by Bome people to beadequate (28-29)...

...

121

in...

...

...

... ......

123

The Reply otherwise explained

(30)

...

...

... ...

123 123

Necessity of the Reality of the Externaltenable (34)

Word...

(32)

...

Denial of the Reality of Conceptions renders even the Bauddha tenet un...

...

......

...

......

124124

Impossibility of Inference,

if

objects not real (35)

...

Denial of the reality of external objects is self-contradictory (53) Superfluity of the Idealistic Argument (60) ... ...

... ...

127128

Cognitions are without substratum only at the time of their actual appear-

ance (63)If Cognitions

...

...

...

...

...

...

129 129

were always without substratum they would never be amenable to Inferential Argumentation (65-66) ... ... ... Universally recognised Distinctions between Virtue and Vice, Teacher and Pupil, &o., would not be possible, if there were no reality inobjects (72-73)... ......

...

...

...

130

Idealism contradicted by facts of ordinary experience (74) If all Ideas are false, there is universal negation (74-75)

......

... ... ...

130 130131

Counter-argument against Idealism (79-80)

...

...

Certain self-contradictions in the Idealistic theory (81-82) ... ... If Idealism be accepted, all systems of Philosophy are equally false (85-87)i

132 133 133

There could be no distinction between false dream cognition and true loahing cognition, both being equally unreal (88-89) ... ... ... No Togic faculty can supply the necessary explanation (93-94) ... ,., Another self-contradiction in the Idealistic theory (99-100) ... ...

132135135

The Middle Term

of the Idealistic

Argument...

is

one that...

is

not recognised... ...

by the other party (101-102)

The Middle Termpatible (106-107)

of the

Argument...

contradictory and the Instance incom... ......

......

136137

The causes

of certain

common

delusions explained (109-13)

,.,

Only mistaken cognitions can be said to be devoid of

real...

substratum...

(11M9)

...

...

...

...

138 138

No

Instance of Dissimilarity mentioned in the Idealistic Argument (121-22) The Mention of such an Instance would involve a double negation, i.e., an aflSrmation which would be impossible if no objects existed (124-25) ...

A

reasoning to be effective must be acceptable to both parties (130-31) ... The Argument brought forward by the Idealist should contain nothing that he does not accept to be true (143) ... ... ... ...

139 140141

That which

No

held to be unreal could never have been real (156) reality can proceed from a reasoning that is unreal (159) ...is

now

......

142142143 14314-t

The Chief Klementsunreal (163)...

in

the reasoning of...

the Idealist are... ... ... ...

admittedly...

...

Worldly activity not explicable by mere Idea (169)

......

...... ...

No No

specification of FsaTi possible (178-79)

proof for the existence of Fasana (180-81)extant,...

...

...

144

Vdsanas,

even it order (192-93)

could never bring about... ... ...

effects

in...

a

serial...

U6

9L0KAVABT1KA.Page.Itis

only

a

permanent

aonl...

that

can...

serve

as...

the

substratum of...

Fasamas (199-200)

...

147148

Buddha propounded the Idealsitio theory with the minds of men away from wordly objects (202)

sole...

view of turning the......

Section 4; Qunymidda

...

...

...

...

...148-82

Inferential Idealistic arguments expounded in detail (2

-63)...

NoIt

differenceis

only that which

between the shape of the Cognition and the Cognised (6) is cognised that can have an existence {7)

......

... The shape cognised cannot belong to the external object (9) The character of the Oogniser cannot be attributed to the Object (13) The real character of Cognitions is absolutely pure, and it is only

148 148 149149 149

...

ever-

continuing Vdsands that make it appear in diverse forms (15-17) ... Another reason for attributing the form to Cognitions (21) ... ,,, Otherwise the Cognition could not appear prior to the comprehension of the... ... Objects (25) ... ... ... ... Third Argument to show that the form belongs to Cognitions (32) ... The form of the Object cannot be said to be imposed upon the Cognition (35) The form cannot be held to be a property of the contact of the Cognition

150150151151

with the Object (42)

...

...

...

...

...

I52 152 135

Contact not possible in the case (43) ... The Idea and the Object both cannot have the same form (55)

Any such

......

... ...

Refutation of the above arguments (64i-263)

Idea cannot be both the Cogniser and the Cognised (64) ... ... The case of Self is different It can be both This fact explained (67) ... There is often an idea of the Cognisable Object without that of the Cognising Idea (79) ... ... ... ... ... ... The comprehension of the Object alone, or of the Idea alone, cannot be ex-

154155

1.56

The

plained on the mere ground of Capability or Incapability (95) difference between Object and Idea not one of Time...

...

158

and Form...

only (100)Predioability

...

...

...

...

159

and Knowability explained (103) ... ... ... No absolute difference between any two objects (105) ... ... Cognition being one, the difference in conceptions is due to a diversity amongobjects (116)...

159

leo161 ,61

...

...

...

...

A

single object never

cognised as both Cotnprehender and Comprehend....... ......

ed{UO)ed (129)

...

...

Duality of Existence...

Comprehender... ...

and...

Comprehended...

fully......

establish...

163

No

^po?ia possible (136)

...

...

......

ig^I64

Reasons against the assumption of Apoha (137) ... ... The character of Idea belongs to the Comprehonder only (148-49)

..,

165

CONTENTS,

Vll

Page.

Ideaa oannot have,

among

themselves, the relation of the Conceived and......

tlie...

Means

of Conception (149-50)

...

103

Pecnliar oaneal relationship between the Ohjeot and the Idea (151-52)

...

Their sequence does not ooustitnte oansality (154-55) Simnltaneity of Cause and Effect not possible (156-57)

...

,,....

166 166166 167167

...

The object comprehended by Memory (159-61) ... ... ... The Past can never be the object of Sensuous Perception (161-62) ... The Past Conception oannot be comprehended either as the Comprehendedor the Comprehender (163-64)...... ......

167168

A

Conception cannot have the daplioate character of the Compreliender and the Comprehended (168-69) ... ... ... ...Efifect,

Ideas appearing in the same series oannot have the relation of Cause andor that of impression and Impressed (171-72)... ......

168168 168 169

The Comprehended must be different from the Com preheuder The Idea cannot comprehend itself (175-76) ...,

(174-75)...

......

No No

duplicate capability in Conceptions (177-79)

... ...

......

Conception comprehended by

itself (180-81)

......

169 169 170170171171

Existence of Objects not explicable without Ideas (182) ... An Idea always depends upon something else for its comprehension (184) The Element of Remembrance in subsequent Cognitions is mistaken (192)Series of Cognitions explained (193)... ...

.........

...

Kemembrance could not belongseries (195),., ...

to

every one of... ......

the Cognitions in a... .........

Cognitions are not the objects of Conception (197)

...

171172172 173

Proximity and Relativity do not belong to Conceptions (200)Cognitions appear even in the absence of Impressionscausal efficiency belongs to these latter (203)...;

...

and... ...

as such no... ...

Incorrect Cognitions explained (207)

...

...

Forms

dreamt of or otherwise cannot be attributed to Cognitions... ..,

(209)...... ...

173173

Falsity of Dream-Cognition Explained (210)

Certain delusions explained (212-13)Different Ideas with regard to the

...

...

......

173

same object explained (214)...

174175 176178 179 180

Comprehension of contradictory forms with regard to the same object... ... explained (219) ... In ordinary experience an External object...

...

is

never cognised in the form of...

the Internal (229)

...

...

...

...

Reason for proving beforehand that the comprehension of the Object pre... ... ... ... cedes that of the Idea (241) ,. No recognition of the Idea apart from the forms of Objects (246-47) ... Specialities of Time and Place, &o., serve to explain all apparent discrepancies in comprehensions (253) ... ... ... .. No agency of Tasana possible (256-58) ... ... ... ... Absence of External Objects not proved by any of the recognised Pramdnas (259-6H ... ... ... ... Atoms not being comprehensible by themselves, their aggregates must be admitted to be the real objects of comprehension (262) ... ...

]80181 181

Ill

CONTENTS.Page.

... ... Section 6: Inference There can be no doubt as to the validity ... Knowledge (1) ... ...

.

182-207

of

Inference as a means of...... ... ...

... ...

...... .,.

Definition of Inference explained (2)

...

182 182 183184,

The oogniaaDoeGrounds for the

of Invariable

Concomitance (1213)...

falsity of Ideas (18-19)

.,

The object of Inference is the Minor Term Term (27) ... ... ... The word 'osajimSrsAte'. explained (56-56) Verbal Testimony (61-62)

as qnalified......

by the Major...... ...

185

... ......

190 190 190191 191

Contradiction of Sense-perception explained (59-60)

..

......

...

... Analogy (65-66) ... ... ... Apparent Inconsistency (66-68) ... ... ... The expression ''perception of one member' (in the Bhashya) explained

(75-76)

...

...

...

...

...

...

192 193

Different forms of the contradiction of the Middle

Term

(79-80)...... ...

......

Reason and Doubt precluded from the Definition (83-85) Oanses of Doubt (83-85) ... ... ... Viruddhatd Contradictory character of the Middle Terra Other Contradictions explained (101-102) ...

...... ......

explained (96)...

193 193 195 196 197 198 199 200201

Similarity and Dissimilarity of the Predicate (107-108)

...

Discrepancies of the Instance (114-16)

...

...

...

...

Necessity of the recognition of the negative relationship of the Middle

Term with

the negative of the Major

Term

...

...

......

Necessity of Negative Instances (131-32) ... ... Real significance of the expression " Sense-perceived relation" (140-42) Samdnya as a Distinct Entity necessary for Inference (148-88)

... ...

The character and cognition

of the Middle'

Term

(163, &o.)'

...

...

203 204 205206

Anyall

discrepancy in the perception of a

samdnya...

destroys the cogency of...

means

of right notion (172)

...

...

Presence of Sams.j/o in the visible objects also (181)

...

...

Section 6: On Words

...

...

...

...

...207...

Neoesaity of defining Verbal Authority in general (1-9) Verbal Authority cannot be included in Inference (15)Difference between the two processes (22-23)...

...

207

...... ...

...

,,...

Arguments

in favour of the identity of both (35-37)...

209 210 212213

Various refutations of these Arguments (38) Difference between ordinary human assertiontions (47)... ...

...

...

and Scriptural...... ...

declara__,...

...

The

Self-validity of Verbal Authority (58)

...

213 214

Necessity of accepting

Verbal Authority not based on Inference (64-98) ... ... word as an independent means of knowledge' '

...

214

CONTENTS.

IXPage.

Section 7: Analogy ... ... Operation of ' Analogy ' explained (1-2) The validity of Analogy (4-5) Similarity, a positive entity (18)' '

.........

...... ...

....

222-232... .........

220

"......

......

......

Different kinds of Similarity (20) Similarity something wholly different

22S 225 225

from the Properties on which... .........

it is......

based (21)

...

...

TheI,

similarity of twins explained (22-23)

...

SimiiaWii/ different from the Classes (26)

... ......

... ... ...

...

amenable to Sense-perception (34)

...... ... ...... ......

It exists in its entirety in each

member

(35)

Analogy (37) ... ... ... ... This object not amenable to any other means of knowledge (38) Semblances of Similarity (40) ... ... ... Analogy is not Inference (43-44) ... ... ... Uses of Analogy as a distinct means of knowledge (52) ...of.

The object

225 226 226 227 227 227 227 227 228 229

SECTIONS: Apparent

Inconsistency

.

...

...

...2S0-43...

Case of the operation of Apparent Inconsistency ... ... Examples (2) ... ... ... ... , Apparent Inconsistency not the same as Inference (8-9) ,.. included in Negation (36) ... ,, ), ,, in Verbal Authority (51) ... The example not explicable by Sense-perception (60) ... ... ... Analogy (74) Uses of Apparent Inconsistency in Mimansa (87) ... ,

...... ...

... ...... ...

230 230 231 234 237 238 240 242

Section 9: On Negation

...

...

...

...

...243-52...

Cases of the Operation of Negation as a Means of Knowledge (3) Difference between Negation and Sense-perception, &o. (17) ... The functioning of Negation purely Mental (27) ... ...

... ...

243 245

Difference between Negation and Inference (29). ... ... ... Bauddha Objection : " The Non-appearance of Sense-perception, &o., would form the Middle Term " Reply to this (38-39) ... ... ...

247 247 248 250 251261

Negation can be a Means of Cognition (45) ... ... ... Negation a distinct means of Cognition (54-55) ... ... ... Other so-called Means of Cognition included in the six herein enumerat-

How

ed

(57)

...

.*

...

...

...

...

Section 10: On Citrakshepa

... ... ... ... .. 252-54 " The Citra Sacrifice cannot bring abont cattle," &o., and hence they are 262 untrue (2-8) ... ... ... .^. ... ...

2

5T,0KAViRTriCA.

The arguments

iu favour of thia

oonaemnation

...

'"

...

252

From Analogy,jiffniftoira,

the falsity Bhown to belong to the passages dealing with the " .. ... , &OT.also (15-)

"

254

SucTroN II

. . ... On BambanShiiksMpa The truthful character of Tedic passages based upon their eternality (1) Eteroality of the relationship between Words and their Denotations (4-5):

254-261... ...

... Objections against this: no sort of relationship possible (6-10) ... ... ... .~ These objections met (11-12) ... ... ... The different methods of the comprehension of this relationship (2T-24) " The words cannot have any denotativeness, prior to the recognition of

25* 25* 255255 257

the relationships" (33)

...

...

...

...

...

^^^259'

.-. ... Such denotativeness shown by tTsajges (34) ... The Cognition of the said relationship is only an accessory in the compre... hension of the meanings of words (42) ... ... ... " There cannot be any natural relationship between the WtK'd and its

260261

8igBifloation"(45)

...

...

.

.-

.-

Section 12: On SpTiofa

.

,

,

....

...261-81...

Consideration of the n.iture of the word (1) ... Cognition of the word by means of Sense-perception (4)

261

...

...

The name Word'

'

applicable, even before the comprehension of... ...

Heaning ^)......

Ko

Constituent parts of Letters (13)is

...

262 262 26S263 263

The Letter Cognisable of Sense-perceptionThere

(14)

...

,

only one individual of each Letter (15) ... ... .., Diversity only apparent due to the diversity in the degrees of effort (25) ... No such Class as 'gatva' possible (27) ... ... . ... No similar denial of the Glass Cow possible (35) ... ... . Perversities of Perception cannot aEeot our Conoluslons (41-44) ... The expression '^DorwolitZa 'explained (4?) ... ... ,

265265 266

'

'

268 269270

Aoeents are merely different forma belonging to the same Letter (57-58) No such Class as gofabdatua (66) ... ... ...' '

.....,

272272 273 274 275275 275

The idea

of the

sameness of the Word due to the identity of component...... ...

letters (67)

.

.,.

...

Instances of gradual operations leading to a common result (74) ... Applicability of the Present Tense to the functioning of the Word (89) ... The whole Word can signify what its parts cannot (86) ... ... Objection " No denotative potency inhering in the parts, there could be none in the toJioZe " (87-88) ,,. .,, ,,. __,

theory also (91) ... ... More Assumptions necessary for the Sphota theory than foi the Mlmon. saha (94) ... ... ... ... ^..Sj)?ioto

This objection applies to the

276jyg

The Cognition of the last letter meaning of the whole word (96)

of the.

word

I's

the cause of that of the.......

.^.

CONTENTS.

XtFar/e.

ITo assnmplion of an intermedinry SanskSra necessary (97)

...

...

279277

The assumption

of

an imperceptible factor in the process...

is

necessary for...

the SpTioia theory also iamatio of the singleness of Forest' (69-70)' '

... ...... ...

.........

Fourth

Substrate of the idea of

(73-74)...

(70-71)...

334 343 343343 345 346

'Cow'

...

Whole not absolutely different fromthe constituent individuals (75-76)

its

parts...

as Class not different from...

..

...

The ideabody

of

'

Cow

'

not due to the conglomeration of the various parts of its......

(82-88)

...

...

...

...

The

fact of

words denoting one or many objects fixed by Convention (86-89)

xiv

^LOKAViETIKA.Page. 347-74

Section 16; SambandhiTcshlpaparihara

...

...

...

Propriety of the introdnotion of the question of the relationship of

Word and

Meaningmeaning

(1)

...

...

...

...

347 3*834.8

Relationship of

name and named cannot determine the comprehension of the

of the

Word

(5)

...

...

.

...

... Nor is the relationship one of Invariable Concomitance (7) The qnestion of relationship has been bronght forward with a view

to the...

ascertainment of

its eternality

or non-eternality (10)

...

... Denotation of words not baaed pimarily npon Conventional Rules (12) ... ... The denotation of words based upon the Glass (25-26) ... ... ... The necessity of assuming Potency (29) ... If the relation were not eternal, all men oonld not comprehend the word (30) The process of the transference of the knowledge of world-relations (41) ... ... This knowledge cannot be .based upon Conventional Bnles (42) ...

349 349 352 353 353 355 355 356 356 358 358 359

The world could have had no beginning

No

in time (47) personal Creator of the world possible (47-59)

......

... ...

...

The Veda could not have proceeded from any Creator (61) Explanation of those Yedic passages which speak of Creation No proofs for admitting a Pralaya (68) ... ...' ''

...*

......

(61)...

...

Arguments in favour of the Creative agency combated (74-86) ... ... So functioning of the Sanhhya " Attributes" possible (87) ... ... The bondage of souls not due to any actions lying latent in themselves (89) Knowledge cannot be the cause of Deliverance (94-106) ... ... The Eternal Character of Deliverance based upon its Negative Character(107) The nature of Deliverance (108) ... ... ... .,, Method of obtaining Deliverance (110) ... ... ... ... The existence of a Creator is an untenable as that of an Omniscient Person(114-16)...

360 363 363 364 367 367 367368 369 369 373 374

...

...

...

...

...

... ... The verbal relationships of the Proper Name (120) ... The verbal relationship distinguished from those of the Common Name

(122-23)

'

...

...

...

...

...

...

Eternality of the relationship based upon the eternality of ... ings (136-27) ... ... ...

Words and Mean...

... ...

Process of comprehending the Meaning of a

Word

(140-42)

.

... Section 17: GitrdksJiepaparihdra ... ...375-81 ... Falsity of the premises brought forward against the theory of sacrifices bringing about results (1) ... ... ... ... ... 375 Passages laying down such results do not lay down immediateness of their appearance (2) ... ... .., ... ... 375 ,.,

The

non-applicability of Sense-perception does not vitiate the validity of Verbal Authority (4-5) ... ... ... ... ... Even in ordinary actions results do not follow immediately after them (7) ... The fact of only some people possessing cattle, shows that it is the result of the Citrd Sacrifice performed by them in their previous birth (13) ...

379 377

878 379

Results not due to mere chance (18)

...

,.,

,,,

,,,

COKTEHTS.

XVPage.

The NaiySyika theory of immediate sequence of the result as untenable as ... the "Chance" theory (22J ... ... ... ... The non-appearance of .the results due to impediment in their appearance (26)

380381

Section 18: Atmavada ,.. ... ... ... The Sonl connected with the sacrificial implements, through the Body Denial of Soal makes the whole Fedo open to objection (3) ... The Seal is different from the Body and is eternal (7) ...Objections against the eternality of the Sonl (8),,,...

...

(1)

...... ,,,

......

......

Keply to above

(13)

...

...

382 382 382 383 383 384 384 385 38S387 387

People are always cognisant of the fact of a certain result as apppearing from a certain action (15) ... ... ... ... ,

The

Soul's liability to modification does notis

mean

its

destruction (22}...

......

No

absolute destruction of the Sonlof Doer

possible (23)

The character The "Series"

and Enjoyer belong

to the Person, the Soul continuing

throughout the various modifications (29) ... ... ... of Ideas as held by the Banddha not tenable (33) ... It is not possible for mere "Ideas " to transfer themselves into another bodyat rebirth (59)...

...

...

......

......

... ......

No

intermediate subtle bodyif

is

possible (62)

Even

such a body existed, no Ideas could enter into

it

(64)

...

... ... ... Ideas cannot exist in the Embryo (65) ... Potentiality of Ideas cannot exist in the Sense-organs (68) ... ... The first Idea of Man after birth cannot be proved to be the product of any foregoing idea (70) ... ... ... ... ...

392 893 393 893 39i 394 395395

A

Person, or Sonl,alone could bear within himself the potentialities of...:

Idea (73) ... ... Motion is not the only form of actionSacrifices (74)......

...

...

...

Hence Sonl can be the performer...

of...

...

...

... ... The Person is the doer of all Beings and Ideas (76) ... The Body, &c,, could have no actions except, those that belonged to the Soul

395

(78)

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

396 397 397398 398

Evenis

in regard to one

and the sameaffected

action, the operation of several Sonls......

not necessarily identical (85-86)

...

...

The Ego does not become

by any action except

his

own

(89)

...

In the case of the Measure laid down with reference to the sacrificial post, ... ... we must take it as referring to the size of his body (90) The Yaigeshika arguments for the existence of Soul put forward (92-101) ... .,. These arguments refuted by the Bauddha (101-106) ... ... The arguments of the Bhdshya : The Bonl is directly cognisable by thenotion of 'I' (107) ... ... ... Intelligence cannot belong to material things (111-12)... ... ...

40O401 402 403

......'

The Knower cannot be a mere Idea (115-16) The " Series " of Ideas cannot be the object of thecognising'

...

...

recognition of

I

'

(120)

...

404404

Impressions can bring aboat.a recognition only in the case of the previousI'

being the same

m the present

'

I

'

(124-25)

...

...

^Vl

giOKAVAE'riKA.Page.... Suoh notions as I am fat' must be regarded as miaoonoeptiona (127) ... The Sense-organs are always spoken o as different from 'X' (128) The idea of My Soul is due to the Cognition being distinct from the' ' '

405 405 405 407 407 407 408 408

Soul (130)

...

...

...

...

...

... ...

Eafutation of arguments against the Existence of Soul (137-39) In the Knowing of Soul, one must supplement the Veda

with

the

Brdhmanas (140)

...:

...

...

...

The Soul is self-luminous (142) Hence it is not perceived by other Sonls ( 143) ... One Soul is cognised by another by an obserTanoe of its Actions (145) The Soul is imperishable (147) ... ... ...

Sutras VIXXIII. On the Eternality of Words

...

...

...

... ...

Beasons for insisting upon the etemality of words

(1, 2, etc.)

A momentary word is incapable of affording any sense (3)

...

409-485 409 409 ......

Objections against the etemality of words {SUtras 6-11)

...

...410-12

Words are caused

entites

(and hence transient) (9) ... ... ... because there is a difference in the same word as pro...... ...

410410 411 411 412 412

nounced by different persons (10) ... ... They are not all-pervading (hence not eternal) (11) They are caused because they are brought about by efforts

...

... (13) Letters composing words are transient, as they undergo modifications (17) They are transient, as their sound is capable of interception (18) ...

Reply to the above objections {SUtras 12-23) ... All the above arguments are inoonclusiTe (19-20) ... The word is not accepted by all philosophers to be due to(20-22)...

...

...

...

...

412 412 413

human...

efforts...

...

...

...

As

Destruction alsoof.

is

oucaused, the argument urged in Siitra 6 becomes......

contradictory (29-30)

...

.it...

...

414 414415

The perceptionC30-32)

Alcdfa after...'

an

effort...

does not make...

transitory...

Various interpretations of the

non-eternality of the......

word

'

put forward,,.

and refuted

...

...

^.^

Though words have permanentIt is

existence, yet they are not always perceived,

because of the absence of manifesting agencies (40) ... ... by means of a snpersensuous power that the utterance imparts a supersensuous faculty to the organ of hearing, and thereby it becomes the cause of the manifestation of the already-existing word (45) ... ...:

416

The Utterance belongs to the Air, and not to the Organs (49-50) ... Objections The word being only a change in the Akaga of the ear, brought about by utterance, must belong to the whole of it, and as saoh be aUpervading (5G-58).. ....___

417 417

418

CONTENTS.

XVllPage.

Partial cognition of the

word by some people:

only,

is

not possible (64-65)is

...

420 420 420 420421

Diversity of aaditory cognition Ahove objections answered, ... ... diversity in the Bars (65-66)

due to the...

...

... ... ... The Bar is not identical with jlfcaya (66-67) The organic change takes place in the physical sabatratam (the tympanum

of the ear)

...

...

...

...

...

...

The cognition taking place in the bodily organ, one man's cognition does not imply cognition by all men (73-75) ... ... ... ...Similarly one man's deafness does not imply deafness of allSimilarity of conditions between the

men

(76-77)

...

422 423 423 424

Nyaya theory

of

the Production of.........

words and the Mimansa theory

of their manifestation

Method

of Woi-d-ooguition explained: the Vai9eahika view (88-90)......

Objections to the Vai^eshika view (90-106)

...

... The Sdnlthya and Jaina views stated and refuted (106-121) ... ... The Mimansaka view explained (121-30) ... Whatia 'gravanendriya' ? (130-134) ... ... ... The argument propounded in Sutra 7, against Bternality of words found

... ...

426 429430

...

to...

be inooncluaive (155)Objections in Sutra8,

...

...

......... ...

......

434434 435 413 445

met by Sutra 14:

(157)to Sutra 9

......... ...

Explanation of Sutra 15 (163)

answer

... ...

... 16(201) answer to Sutra 11 (211) 17: '

...

...

'

... 18 :' Bternality of Words (230) ... ,, ... ... The arrangement of letters in words is not 'caused' (288) Shortness,' ' Length,' &o., of vowel-souads only mark divisions of time (303) What do you mean by Non-eteruality in the case of words ? (327):' '

448

460463 466 470

objections

...'

...

......

...

...

Necessity of asserting'

eternality

'

of

words (356)'

... ...'

...

It is necessary as it implies the eternality of (relations)

...'

and Action as eternal as the class word and class action (398) ... ... ... Arguments against subtle deatruotions (425) Arguments against non-eternality, and for Bternality of words summed upIdea''

'

'

470 477481

'

'

(443)

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

484

Sutras XXIV XXVI. ... On Sentencein particular (1-110)

...

...

...

...

486

552486

Objections against the Bternality of Sentences in general, and of the...

Veda......

...

...

...

Reply to the above (110) Farther objections (168-181)

..

...

.........

504514 517526 531

...

...

.........

......

... ... Answered (182-221) Change of denotation of words explained (222-246) Explanation of Bhavana (247-316) ...

... ... ......

...

.........

...

Vikalpa-Option (317) Sutra 25 (340)

...

......

542 546

...

Sutras

XXVIIXXXII....... ...

The Veda not the work of an author

553

555

pLOKAViRTIKA.Alphabetical Index.

Page.

Absence of an author safeguards the Veda against Absence of external objects not proved ...Absolute destructionAbstract Perception

all

reproach...

.,,

,,.

31181

......

Action

not prohibited cannot be sinful result not always similar toit.........

not possible of the soul of an object how made concrete

,...

.,, ... ...,.,

.........

,,.

....

......

386 88 885757

...... ..,

... ...

...,,.

......

Actions

Adharma

may be perishable Vedic injunctions and prohibitions

47159

the only means of knowing.....

it

...,,, ...

Agnihotra

...

Aka9a Its perceptionAkyti

after an effort, does not

mate

it

transitoryit

......

necessity of establishing the fact of the word denoting

meaning of the wordit cannot mean shapeits...

...... ...

254 414 281331

......

... .....

......... ...

......

Analogy

object not amenable to any means of knowledge not Inference uses Apoha not possible reason against assumption never actually cognised as significant could apply to no gender, the individual not implied by mutual interdependence involved in basing...

not applicable to Dharma

...

... ... ......,.,

...

......

332 85 226 227 228 229164 164 315

... ... ...... ...

...

...

... ...... ...

its

...

...

...

...

...

...

......

its

...

...... ...

......

... ......

etc.,

it

...

is

it

...

...

320 320322

it

upon mutual negation of...

objects

...

...

,,. ... ...

...... ...

... ...

Apohas

no diverse Apohas pbasible

......

no implication of Apohas possible

...

303 320321

of gender could not be the object of specification ... ... ... ,,. Apohavattva is not possible ... ... ... ... ... Apohist cannot distinguish the cow from the Horse ... no definite cognition of difference among Individual Animals possible

319 305307 85 231231

for

him

...

...

...

.........

...

...

Apparent inconsistency

not applicable to Dharma examples of not the same as Inference...

......

-......

...

...

...... ...

included

in negation

... ...

......

234237

inolndsd in Verbal Teslimony

.

]'i

9L0KAVAETIKA,Page.

Apparent inconsistency

not explicable by Sense-Perception not explicable by Analogy uses in Mimansa......

...

.

238 ^^^

its

""

24.2

AsannikrsliteAfcah

explained...

-..

......

meaning ofof

"

Atha meaning Atoms .

190 18 18181

A varnakata explainedAudibility of word- sounds Aaditory Aka9a ... Auditory organ no movement of

...

...

269

...

......

-.

...

'

possible cannot be all-pervading modificationit its...

...... ....

*^'

......

^^^

Anthority

of the Veda questioned of the Veda undisputed arguments supporting the theory ofits

... ...

" ^*^^

...

... ... ....

it

...

...

*27

Anthoritativeness

its...

extraneous character...

...

refutation

...

.

2829 29^1

its notion duo to extraneous influence ... its three forms ...

...

of Injunction

...

...

...

BBath itsnegation before the investigation of...

Dharma

...

... ... ...... ...

....-.

1417 120 428 316 103 B31 533

its signification ...

...

...

Bauddhas diversity

of opinion

among...

their various scions.....

......

statement and ... "Blue Lotus"... Bhavana explained its three factors,

refutation of their theory...

...

non-difference between lotus and blueness ... ...

...... ,.,

... ......

... ......

......

the object of a single cognitionBodyit...

......

...

545

no idea could enter could have no actions excepting those of the Soul no momentary destruction possible Bondage of souls not due to any action latent ia themselves... ... ...,..

...

...... ...

......... ...

Buddhijuana

...

...

...

...

...

Buddhist Scriptures

unreliable because composed by human beings

...

393 396 480 363 76 46

... ... Capability and incapability Cause and effect their simultaneity not possible

......

,..

... ... ...

...

158 166

Causality not constituted by the sequence of object and idea

...

16621

Codana

meaning of means a word

...

...

......

......

.,,.

......

...

22

iSdEX.

iii

Codana

objections based npon the signiftoation oftion... ......

Page.

the word and their ref nta......

...

cannot be restricted to positive activity only refers to Injunctions and Prohibitions 5 itra sacrifice discussed arguments in favour of...

..,.,,...

51-5353

.........

...... ..,

...

...

it

...

...

...,.,

54 252 232

Citra sacrifice

...

...

...

Class

...

....

37392Ill

its

cognition not inferentialobjects

...

...

... ......

of

and

their relationship

amenable......

to sense-perceptionetc.......... ...

its specification

due to peculiarities of colour,

relationship between and individual purely natural Verbal Testimony and Inference not the means of right knowledge without , Fixity of relation between and individual based upon Direct Senseit...

manifested by the individnal mutual relationship with individualsit......

...

...

...

333 336 283287

...

...

...

...

288

class

Perceptionit is

...

.,.

...

... ... ...... ... ...

...

not identical with Individnal as a whole of uniform character does not consist of similarity among Individuals...

,... ... ...

290291

......

is

...

291

......... ... ...

Class

it is admitted by the Apobist cow is one only ...

... ...,.,

... ......

293 296337

Classes

their restrictions Mimansaka view about

explained

...

... ... ...

......

...

......

289 286

... ...

....

......

298156

Cognisable object and cognising idea

...

Cognised shape does not belong to external objects ... ... ... Cogniser, its character not attiibuted to the object ... ... ... Cognition of class cannot be inferential ... ... ... ... Cognition of objects not in the form of identification with their verbal expressions... ....,,

149149

9298

...

,., ... ...

...

Cognition of objects independent of verbal expressions ... Cognitions undefined only as long as words are not foundCognitions never amenable to Inferential argumentation ... ... ... Cognition and cognised

....

99 Ill 129

Cognitions are without substratum only at the time of their actual appearance......

....

129148

Cognition

form of objects cannot be said be imposed npon only one, diversity among objects not the object of conceptionsto..,,

character could not appear prior to the comprehension of objects... forms belong to them...its......

...

...

...149-50...

150151151161

...

...

...

.........

.........

...

...

...

171172

appear in absence of Impressions forms of dream not attributed to perishable like actionsCognition of Apoha

...

...

......

it...

... ...

......

173 471

......

not possible

......

......

......

312 503

Collective denotation

impossibility of

...

.

19

pLOKAVAKTJKA.Page.

Component word

cognition of sentence not possible thonghfor the

.

*'

their meanins'S are the basisof sentences

comprehension of meanings.........

...

""'"

"*'

Comprehension of contradictory forms

...

of objects precedes their idea...Oomprehender and comprehended ... different from each other ... fully established .. ... Comprehender Idea belongs to him ... Commonality necessary for the colleotive idea

'

... ... ... ...-.

of things...

^^^^

of a

number...

282

Compatibility of Singularity with Plurality Conceived and Means of conception, etc.

......

......

Conception

... its falsity explained .., falsity due to its non-produotibility not both comprehended and comprehender

... ...

,

1 ^"^ 1^9 489 558

.

no duplicate capability innoConclusion...

... ...

......

......

not comprehended by itselfassociation......

...... ...

among conceptions... ...... ... ......

......

......

Conjunct words^their cases explained Convention ... ... ... Rules regarding themEestriction...

... ......

... ...

...... ... ...... ...

....,, ,.,

524 3*6 849 and 355 109 ...... ... ......

Container and Contained

...

Contradiction of sense-perception

...

311 190

by Verbal testimony Analogy ... Apparent InconsistencyConscience theory not tenable ... Contact of cognition with the object

190191 191196

...... ...

...,.,

explained........, .., ...

,,....

CowCreation

... ,.,

......

...

.,.,

Creative Agency

...... ...

59 152 100, 266, 343, 345, 297 and 311 360 ... ... ... 860 ... ... .........

......

...

(Junyavada

its

refutation

...,.,

... ...

...

......

163A62

Pyena Sacrifice sinful

.

DeliveranceDelusions

,...

... ...

.........

...... ......

,,,

......

sg4 gg^ 137 ^nd 173... ... ... ......

Different Ideas as regards the

same object

Denotativeness

of words not due to Convention of words not prior to relationship...

174108 259

... .........

... ... ...

Denotation of meanings, etc. ... Denotative potency neither in part not Denial of the reality of Conceptions

in

whole...

^12 275 ^34

.

...

INDEX.

VPace.

Denial of the reality of External objects Destruotiou ... ,

...

... ,.,

... ...

... ,,,

127

...

Charma

...

...

...

...,.,

usefulness of investigation definition Authority for the means of knowing signification of sense-perception not applicable to Discussion necessity .its its...

414 19,21-26,21,23,49,50,59-77,113... ......,.....

......

...

19 2121

it

......

......

full

...

...

......

4977 119 26S 478 287 321193

it

...

......

its

Diversity

only apparentofeffort......

...

,.........

...

...

......

.... ... ... ... ...

... ...

......

Doer and Enjoyer Double Negative Doubt its causes

...

.......

...

...... ...

Dream

....

......

...

its falsity

...

...

,.,

...

173

EEaris

not identical with Alja^aeffected

...

...

...

...

...... ...

Ego does not become

by any action exceptit...... ...

his

own.....,

...

Embryo ideasEntity...

cannot exist in...

...

...

......

......

...

Eternality of letters and wordsBternality of words

...

...

420 397 393 313 459

Eeasons for and objections against......

...

...409-12

Excellences of the source of words only serve to set aside the charges of unanthoritativeneas ... ... ... ... ...

31

Existence of creation untenable Existence of soul

......

...

....,....

318

refutation of arguments againstnever internalits realityits......

......

External object

is

External world

necessity of

......

407 176121

and denialreality

...

... ...

119,...

...

...

123

FFalsity of the premises

First idea of

man not the..

urged against Sacrifices,... ... ...

etc.'

,.,

.......,, ...

... ......

375

product of foregoing ideas

...

FlamesForest

......

......

394 483 458

...

...

Forms

of

words

explanation of the comprehension of their meaningsQ.........

334, 341

and 343

...

General negation

.........

GoQabdatva no such class Gotva no such class possible

,...

.....

...... ,,,

296 232 265

...

...

HHearing

is

due to changes in the bodily organ

...

...

...421-23

6

Yi

9LOKAVARTIKA.I

Page.

Idea

apparent identity with word and object worldly activity not applicableits...

... ......

... . ...

......

100 143153 154 1^8

Idea and object cannot have the same form ... cannot be both cogniser and cognised ... Idea not oomprehender of itself ... Idea of cow ... ... ...

......

......

......

.

...

336, 337

... Idea of singleness with reference to forest ... ... Idea and Action ... ... ... Ideas their falsity leads to universal negation neither cause and effect, nor Impression and Impressed existence of objects not explicable without them depend on something else for their conception ...

.... ... ... ...

...

and 343 339477 130 168169

....

... ...

...... ...

... ......

grounds for their no intimate relation possible among them no association among them not recognised as mere negationsfalsity...

...

...

......

170 184 488

...

...

... ...

4893C3 392 121 128 130 132131

...

...

......

cannot transfer themselves into other bodiesIdealistic position expounded...

... ...... ... ... ...

......

......

......

superfluity ofIdealism

it...

...

contradicted involves falsity of Philosophical systems counter-arguments against Idealistic theory contradicted......

...

... ..,...

... ,,,...

...

......

... ...

...132-35...135-86...

refuted

...

no instance of Dissimilarity mentioned in contains untrue things...

......

38141

...

......

... ...

chief element in reasoning propounded to turn away men's mindsits

...

...

...

Imposition of the form of words on the object

is

impossible......

...,.,... ...

101,...

143 148 104it,

Imposition theory

...

.........

......

ImpressionsIncorrect cognitionsIndividual

,,, ...

......

404173

......

...

Increase or decrease of word-sounds refuted

......

... ......

does not signify classrelation with ApohaIndriyaInference... ,,,

necessary along with Class...

...,,....

... ...

445 283 287 319 76 34 38 2

... ... ,,, ...

...

...... ...

.........

.,,,_,

...

not applicable to objects in the future preceded by Sense-perception..

not applicable to Teda

... ,,, ,,,.__

.........

......

not applicable to Dharma.impossible,

...

based upon Sense-perceptionwhenits its...

.,,...

...

.........

,__

as a means of knowledge definitionobjectis

objects are not real...... ...

... ,.,.......

84 87 124132 ^2 I85

.,,...

the minor term

,,.

INDEX.

^Jj

T

Iiijnnotion the only means of knowing Dharma necessity of having recourse to it Instance discrepancies of ... ...

,.

Page,

...

...

.__

uj,jj^s

......

...

joo__

of

forest

...

...

of gradual operation leading to common ResultIntelligence cannot belong to material things IntroductionInvariable Concomitance

...

...

gg...

......

...

273 4021

...

183

not needed

for the signification of sentences

,,.

...

529

JJain and Sankhya theory

moving of sound discussedK

..,

,.,

,,,

426

Karoti

Knower not a mere idea Knowing of soul ...

its

true meaning in " ^aholara Karoti "

...

...

__

434_

...

...

...

._,

403 40^

IiakshanaLetters

its

signification

...

..

have no constituent parts

... ... ...

... ......

_

,.,

_

22 263

cognisable by sense-perception ... only one individual of each ... Accents are merely different forms ... sameness of words due to their identity composing words are transient .., refutation of the above ... ,,. arguments based upon their changes

...

... ...

___..._.

......

263 263 270272 412 4j2

... ......

...

..._

......

...

443

MMeasure

Meaning

post of of a word, comprehended of words not mistaken of sentencessacrificial...

... ...

......

...

... .._

390 374 457 551251

...

...

Means

of cognition enumerated...

... ...

,.,

...

...

___

Memory Memory

...

......

......

of Perception

explained...

......

____ _

jgy jQg

Mental recognition of the word Mention of Dissimilarity in the Middle terms ...

...

......

...... ...

Idealistic...... ...

Argument... ...

......

Mlmansa pastra its purpose

277 139 193 and 204...

... ...

_._ ...

2 3

its

connection

.,,

...

VIU

9L0KAVART1KA.Page.

Mimansaka theoryMisconceptionsModification

aooorde with Panini's view...

...

... ...

...

...

...

... ........... ...

...

Mistaken cognitions devoid of real sabstratnm

...... ...

.........

of the soul, not... ...

its

destruction

Momentary word :incapabl6Motion

of affording

any sense,...

429 405 138 385 409395 405

not the only

form of action...

......

......

My

soul

NNaiyayika arguments against Apoha not tenable theory untenable as chance theory Nanu samanyato drshtam, etc. explained .........

......

...

...

326 380

...

......

...... ......

Nanvavidusham

etc.

explained

... ...

......

......

Necessity of negative instances

......

Negation as a means of knowledge Negation and Sense-perception ... its functioning purely mental and Inference ..

...

... ... ... ... ...,,,

......

......... ...

... ......

Banddha objection against negation How a means of cognition positive entity in form Abstract forms of objects not negation...

46 44 200 243 245 247 247

...... ...

......

......

^no

its

...

...

......

......

cannot have propertiesNegative

...

...

250 250 295 295 326

Apoha relation with

Positive entity impossibleof the sacrifioe...

......

......,,,

SH51

No

apiirva apart

from a potentiality...

Non-cow the explanation cannot be explainedNon-entityNon-eternality... ...

...

....,. ...

3H4I3451 465 322 326 490

......

various interpretations Beal and formal objections against Non-negation of the class cannot be postulated cannot have properties,,,...

^^^.__

it

......

...

...

...

,,,...

...

,

Notions of the word and

its

meaning not related as

qualification

and

qualified

OObject

its

and Idea their differenceOmniscient author

apparent identity with Idea and word and Idea cannot have the same form

......

...

.,.,

loO153 159

.

the character of the Teda itself does not lend support to the theory of ... ... , ___ Omniscient person no ground for assuming the existence of_

^~ 41oqi-

...

...

Operation of several souls

...

...

,..

___

Past

conception ^ never the object of sensuous perception......^

.,,

......

...

,.

,,. lt>7iffj

INDEX.

IXPage.

Parts

not manifostera of the class.........

......

,,.

,,,

bring about the idea of classParts of the cowPerishability of idea...

,.,

329 330 329

...

...

......

......

......

......

......

479192 268

Perception of one member ... ... ,., Perception its perversities cannot affect onr conclnsions Pleasnres of Heaven not similar to dreams ... ...

...... ...

...

Positive entity

...

,.....

...

,,,

...

Positive entitiesPositivity

...

...

......

no idea possible with regard to Apoha Potency the necessity of assuming Potentialities of Ideas cannot exist in sense-organsit...

......

... 120 302 and 311 304 .........

...... ...

,...,.,

316 353394 395 359 32 80 8613

......

Pralaya

no proofs of admitting self-recognition not explanation of

can only exist in soulit

,...

......

...,., ,.,

.........

Pramanas theirPratyayita

anthoritativeness, etc.its

true result...

......

...

......

......

Preclusion of studies other than that of the Veda ... of all the means of knowledge from the case of Dharma ,, Predicate similarity and dissimilarity ... ...

......... ...

...

24197 159

...... ... ... ......

Predicability and KnowabilityPrefixes

......

... ...

...... ... ... ...

and Nipatas

...

Present tense application to the functioning of word Proper names ... ... ... Proximity and Relativity ... ...

... ... ...

501 274 128 172

Q

absent between whiteness and the class cow Qualification and qualified this relation absent in the notionsQualification

...

...

490 490

of

word and...

its...

meaning

...

...

,,,

...

EEaja-purnshah...

...

...

... ...

.........

... ... ......

Reality of sentence and its

meaning not...

possible...

Reason and Donbt

...

......

324 486 193179

... Recognition of idea apart from objects Reoognisability not enough to prove etemality Regulation of Apoha must be based upon usage

......

...

... ... ......

...

...

476 328309 363

Rejection of non-cow Relation is eternalRelationship

application of...

... ...

... .........

...... ... ... ... ...

... ...

impossible refuted different methods of comprehension cognition in comprehending meanings of words......

...

...

...

......

...

255 255 257 260

its

...

X

91'OKAVARTIKA,Page.

Eelationehip

does not exist between word of qnestion of

its signification

261 347Q JO

between word and meaning between name and named

...

.

not as invariable concomitanceits

.....

eternality or non-eternality

348 3493fi9

Eelationship of proper names

...... ... ...

distinguished from common names ... cannot be asserted ... ... Bemembranoe in cognitions mistaken

369

...

^'

conld not belong to cognitionsBepetition... ... ...

l''^

......

^''^

Eeply to objections against eternality of sonl...Kesalts

. ...

"843/9 381 384

certain results follow certain actionsSSacrifices... ... ......

of actions their non-appearance dne to impediments.........

...

.

...

...

... ...

Sacrificial slaughter

not sinful... ... ...

......

... ... ...

54 61

SamSamanya Samavaya

......

... ... ...

...... ..

74 94119

...

...203-06......

...

...... ... ... ...

...... ... ...

SamTfti Reality

synonymous with falsity... ...

......

Samskara ... Sanghatah... Sankhya Attributes

......

276 and 280..,

...... ...

...

...

......

... ... ...... ... ... ... ... ... ...... ... .....

317 36373 213 39155

Sat necessity of the word ... Scriptural declaration and human assertionScripturesSelf

... ...

...

...... ... ... ......

composed by human beings not authoritative both cogniaer and cognised ... ... Self-recognition not the true result of Pramana ... Self-validity of Verbal authority ... ... ... Senses their functioning explained ... ...

is

their number only Sense-organs their mixed functioning their exclusive objects differenciated different from I or Soulfive... ......' '

80 214 74 98 96 98 405gs

...... ... ... ...

......

...... ...

...

Sense-perception

not applicable to objects in future...

explained precisely applicable to certain kind of cognitions definition made by and sat...

... .........

wq112

...

tot

...

not the means of knowing Dharma not applicable to Dharma..." Sense^peroeived relation "......

... ... ... ......

jjg ..68-112.__

...

732qi

Sentences

impossibility of getting at their meanings their reality and meanings not possible

... ...

456^gg

'

INDEX.

XI

Fage.

Sentencestheir cognition not possible througli worda ... cannot be oonstitated by connection or exolnsion no spliota of tliem ... ... ... their meanings expressed by words ... cannot express meanings directly ...

...

...

their eternality proved and their meanings...

of

words...

... ... ......

487 493494

...... ...

502503 551 505 506 171

... ... ...... ...'

...

... ... ... ...... ...

...

... ...... ...

...... ... ... ......

words capable of making them... ...

Series of Cognitions

Series of Ideas

not tenable

cannot be the object of recognition ofSignification of affixes, Nipatas, prefixes, etc.Signification of

I...

...... ... ... ......

non-Brahmanhood...

...

... ... ... ... ... ... ...

...

387 404 536 298225 225 225

Similarity

different from properties of twins explained different from classes...

of different kinds

...... ... ... ...

...... ... ... ... ... ...

...

amenable

to sense-perception

... ...

entirety in each member exists between words pronounced differentlyin its

226 227 227

... ... ... ... ...

... ... ......

Simultaneity of

letters...

...

...

... ......

Single idea of cow class

not false... ... ... ... ......

...... ......

457 277 337341

Singleness of forest

...... ...

Soul

... ...

Sound

Specialities of

Time and Space...

... ... ... ...

Specialization

of two kinds reference to

Sphota theory

Subject-matter of the Treatise Subtle body not possible

......

...382,383,407,408 ...427,428,430,434 ... 180 ... ... .,. 537 ... ... ... 275, 276, 277, 280, 514 and 517 1-20 ... ... ,,....

.,.,

... ...

...

393531

Svargakamo yajeta

..,

...

Teacher and Pupil distinction between ... Theory of the Vai^eskas ear is a part of space

....

...

.,, ...

.

130 433

UUltimate Entities Usage not based upon them like atoms ... Utterance imparts faculty to the organ of hearing ... ... cause of manifesting words ... belongs to air and not to organs ...

......

,,.

... ,,,

...,,,

......

objections with regard to does not affect any change in the auditory organ...

...

...

302 417 417 417 418421

...

...

5L0KAVAETIKA.

Page.

Force of the word Vana other explanations ofVaVaiQeshika Arguments

...

...

......

...... ...... ... ...

...

37341

set

word ... down and refutedthe... ... ... ... ... ...

...

...

398-400...

Varioua interpretations of the opening passages of the Bhashya

4144

Tasana

no agency possible impossible, with regard to negative entity Vastutva no such class Veda authority questioned self-evident character undisputed authority not due to human origin......

no specification possible no proof for the existence of never bring effects in serial order permanent soul substratumits

... ...

...... ......

......

.........

141 146147

...

... ......

...............

... ...... ...... ...

180 313

...

its

...

...

its its

.,,

...

...

...

...

...

...

lias no author

...

...

...

not the work of

......... ...

...... ...

285 24 ... 26 35 ,,, ... 35 553-555....,,

an omniscient author absurdity incurred in denying its authorityits

,.,

arguments supporting

authority

...

...

the only meaus of knowing Dharma could not have proceeded from any creator objections against eternality...

arguments supporting the view thatits

... ...

it is

composed by human hands... ...

,...,

..,...

...

...

... ......

___ ...._

Vedanta theory controverted

...

...... ...

... ...... ...

Vedic passages their truthful character Verbal authority necessity of ...its self-validity...

39 43 43 553 gg 353 453 87

not included in inference negation...

...... ... ...

...

... ...

....

....

254 207 209 21437g qqq32]^

^non-applioability of sense-perception Verbal Testimony and Inference ... ...

Verbs

no notion of

...,,,

... ...

.

..,

utilitarian theory not tenable Virtue and Vice distinction between Viruddhata contradictory characterVirtue

,,,

,,.,,,

.,,,.,

59j3q..

,,....

...

...

jgg

WWhiteness

eternality ofdifferent

such qualitiesits

... ...

...

.q.

Whole notWord its

Whole word

from meaning of

parts... ...

...

...,,,

... ......'

oao __,

authoritativenesa

apparent identity with Idea and Object

consideration of nature cognition by means of perception name applicable before meaning idea of sameness due to lettersits

,.

"'

t^noei

....,,

...,,, ....

,,.

oco ~q^

'" ..

...

...

INDEX.

xmPage.......

Word

various theories regarding as a whole not dae to human efforts all-pervading and impartite cannot collectively produce any idea not cognised in parts oonneotioa with the theory of moving Auditory organ objections against the aboveit......

...

279 413421

.....

,.,

...

..,...

...

...

..

488 437 440 441 4i2 456465481102 105 105105

...

...

...

.........

...

...... .....

...

...

notion

possible not perishable no destruction, subtle, gross or momentary possible Words not independent of the material form of objects...

means created by God with meaning notof diversity got at by......

of Inference

...

...

...

...

.........

...

........

cannot give any idea until the object objects do not depend on themobj*eot

is...

known

...

... ... .........

only form of the cognised through them not mere verbal forms imposed upon them forms of objects not dependent on themrelationship with objects, eternal... ...

...

... ......

...... ......

Ui5

106 106 521 526

......

signify a connected meaning in sentences expressive of option difference between them and sentence...

their basic form distinguishable forming parts of technical expressions

... ......

...... ...

528542 549

...

......

......

...

... ...

Words and Denotations ... Words and letters Words caused entities

......

......... ...

... ......

23441.0

,507

and 509...

as pronounced by different persons caused since brought about by efforts...

... ...... ...

...

...

.........

... ...

410 411416

exist permanently, but not always perceived

non-eternality refuted order, shortness, length,eternal...

..

...

...

454463

etc.,...

marked by time which..

is

only one and... ... ......

............

their non-eternality rejected by scripturesArguments provingWorldtheir eternality

Inferential arguments regarding themtime

464 465 480 355 356 355

...

no personal creator possibleWorld-relations,.,

could have no beginning in

......-

...

......

.... ...

...

...

...

...

Yogio faculty

untenable for Bauddhas

...

...

..

.

133

INTRODUCTION.The word Mimaiisa'more properly Purva Mirainsa ' is applied the system originally propounded by Jaimini. The other names given to this system uve' Purvakanda,' Karma-Mimnnsa,' KarmakSnda,' Yajnavidya,' Adhvaramimansa,' Dhannamimansd,' and so forth some'

'

to

'

'

'

'

people even speak of

it

as the

'

Dvadagalahihni.

'

Inasmuch

as the

Lharmatlieie

it

is

avowed object commonly spoken oi:

of this sjsteffl is a consideration Of'

are three sections or JiTan^as'

and theis

Jnanakanda'

And

it

is

^s Bharmamtmansa.' Of the Veda, The Karmakanda, the Upasanakdnda, only that portion of the Veda which

is dealt with in the Purva-MimaAsIl ; and for this reason ^it is spoken of as Purvukanda,' PiirvammUnsa, or KarmamimSnsa.' Though the Karmakanda of the Veda treats of many such actions as Sacrifice," Giving," Offering,' and the like, yet it is of the sacrifice that this system treats mostly, and it is full of' ^ '

contained in the

first of

these that

discussions about sacrifices only.as'

And

for this reason people speak of

tliis

yajnamimaAsn

'

or

'

Adhvara-mtviansa.';

This consideration of Dharma is found to consist of twelve parts and these parts have been put by Jaimini in the form of twelve Adhyayas; and

hence the system has come to be known by the name of

'

Dvadagalaskshani.'

For a detailed explanationadhikarana, the readeris

of the subject-matter of each

Adhyaya and

referred to the Appendix.

Whilethatis

chiefly dealing with these subjects, Jaimini lias in

many

placesall

dealt with other things in connection

with these.

It

is

clear

that

by Jaimini is chiefly Vedic. In the work known as the Veda' beginningless and authorless, were found mentioned hei-e and there, at random, many sacrifices, offerings, &o. And hence it was very difficult to understand and grasp the methods and procedure oftreatedof'

the various sacrifices, &c.;

consequently,step the

at

the

time of the perform-

meet with and difficulties. And all this difficulty has, once for all, been set aside by Jaimini, by means of the Sutras dealt with here. And it was only after the Mimansa philosophy liad been duly propounded that the path of KarmakSnda became easy. At tlie very outset, Jaimini divided the Vedic sentences into two Tlie Mantra and the Brahmana, kinds The former is now known Saiihita' as the f.i. There are many. BrahRgveda sanhita, &c. nianas that are known as 'Upanishat, f.i. the Brhadaranyaka andsacrifice,

ance of a

at each

performers would

serious doubts

;

'

'

; '

the

Chandogya.

into other sorts

Then again ho proceeds to sub-clivitle these two kinds the Rk, the Sama, and the Yaju.

The definitions that he lays down for the differentiation of the Mantra and the Brahmana are embodied in the Sutras II i 32 and

of'

33;

whereincalled'

it

is

said that,

that

which,certain

at

the timein

the per-

formanceit

of a sacrifice,; '

points out

details'

connection with

is

earlieris

Mantra authors have

and the rest are calledas there are

Brahmana.

But the'

distinctly declared that this definition;

of

Mantrafulfil

only a tentative one

many Mantrasof

that do not'

the conditions herein laid'

down, and are yet

called

Mantras.'in

Thesacri-

Mantras,

'

in

reality,

take the place

Aphorisms dealing with;

ficial details,

and the Brahmanas are commentaries on them

fact,

they are frequently spoken of as such by fankaracarya.

Rh, Yajush and

Sama

are the three sub-divisions of the

said

two

divisions of the Veda.

Mantras and Brahmanas, that sentence wherein we have distinct divisions into' feet,' is called a'jR' (Sutra i Mantra.' The the other names of which are ^Rca,' 'Cloha, II 36) sentences that are capable of being sung are known as 'Sama (II i 36).

Among

;

'

'

The

rest are called

'

Yajush'

(II i 37).

The

text

of

the

MimMnsa philosophy

is

the

most extensive

of

all

the Sutras have twelve Adhyayas, divided

into sixty Pddas, containing

about 1,000 Sutras, dealing with 1,000 sections or Adhikaranas.

The word

'

AdhikarSna

'

really

means

'Discussion,'

'Consideration,'

In the Mimansa we find that each Discusssion is made up of five parts: vig. : (1) Vishaya--ihe subject-matter under consideration, (2) Vigaya, or Sahgaya the doubt arising in connection'Inquiry,' 'Investigation.'

with that matter,

(3)

P%irvapakshai}xe standpoint of the opponent,

and the arguments in support thereof, (4) Uttara or SiddhSnta the demonstrated conclusion, (5) Sangati Relevancy of the discussion with the particular context. Some authors explain uttara as the arguments against the view of the opponent, and instead of Sangati they have Nirnaya which they explain as Siddhanta. This system of discussion is adopted, more or less, in all the Sanskrit philosophical systems. The Sutras are all arranged in the above order of discussion. But a mere reading of the Sutras does not afford us any idea as to where a and another begins. For all these, as also for a discussion ends, proper understanding of the Sutras themselves, we have to fall back upon certain commentaries upon the Sutras. Of these commentaries, and commentaries on commentaries we have

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

an almost endless

series.

The

oldest

commentary ou

tlie

SBtra^'

that

is

available now,

is;

the Bhashya by ^avarafchougli

Svami (published

in

the

Bibliothem Indica)

we

findis

commentai'ies, chief

among which

BhSsJiya referring to other the VftH of the " revered Upavarsha."this

Oq

the Bhashya, we have the commentary of Kamarila Bhatta, generally

spoken of as " Bhatta." This work is divided into three parts, known under three different names: (I) The Clokavartika, treating of thefirst,

tlie'

Tarka, (Polemical)

PadaSeries,

of the First'

the

Caukhambha Sanskrit

Benares)

dealing with the last three Pddas of Adhynyasll and III (published in the 'Benares Sanskrit Series,' and and (3) The being translated into English by the present translator) Tuptika dealing with Adhyayas IV XII (published [in the Benares Sanskrit Series '). On the first of these, we know of two commentaries (I) The KaqikS by Sucarita Mi^ra, and (2) the Nydyamtnakara of Parthasarathi Mi9ra (published in the Caukhambha Sanskrit Series,' Benares) extracts from these two commentaries have been put in as notes in the present work; and (3) the NyayasudhS of Some^vara Bhatta. On the second, the only commentary we know of is the Nyayasudhct, generally known as Bdnaka, by Some^vara Bhatta (in course of publicaAnd on the third, tion in the Caukhambha Sanskrit Series,' Benares). we have only one proper commentary, the Vartikdhharana by Venkata Dikshita the other, the Tantraratna cannot be spoken of as a commentary in the proper sense of the word as it is a semi-independent commentary on the Sutras themselves, though here and there, taking up and explaining certain passages from the Bhashya and the Vartika. This;

Adhynya (published in The Tantravnrtika, Adhyaya I, and the whole of;

(2)

'

:

'

;

'

'

'

'

;

'

;

closes the list of works, indirectly dealing

with the present work.

The

first

Sutra of Pada

i,

Adhyayais

I,

deals with the usefulness of anof

investigation into Dharma.

a treatment of the questions What

we have is its definition ? Dharma ? By what means of knowledge is Dharma cognisable ? and so forth. From the beginning of the second Pada to the end of the Adhyaya, weIn the remaining partthe Pada,

What

have a consideration of the means of Dharma, andauthoritative character of the Veda,as

its

Result, as also theof

the sole means

knowing

Dharma.[SUTEA (l).j

inasmuch as Dharma is a purpose alone, and the Veda is the only that is conceivable by means of the has finished the study of the Veda, he authority for it, after the student

The meaning

of the Sutra is that

Veda

should continue with his teacher adetails of

little

longer, with

a view to learn the

Dharma.

'

This Sutra contains two Adhikaranas,( 1 )

i.e.,

it

treats of

two subjects

:

Is a study Is

of the

Veda

necessary for

all

the three higher castes

?

(2)

Dharma a

subject for consideration ?dealt with

It is only the latfer aspect;

of the Sutra that has been

by the commentators

and the

obvious reason for this

is

that with regard to the former, there can be no

doubt in the mind of any person who is not an avowed Atheist, and as such not to be admitted into a philosophical discussion. The Adhiharana dealing with the latter question is thu