10
Sida’s Humanitarian Work Sida’s Humanitarian Work

Sida’s Humanitarian Work. Sida’s Strategy for Humanitarian Work 2008-2010 Based on the Government’s Humanitarian Policy (2005). Aim: Save lives, alleviate

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Sida’s Humanitarian Work Sida’s Humanitarian Work

Sida’s Strategy for Humanitarian Work Sida’s Strategy for Humanitarian Work 2008-20102008-2010

• Based on the Government’s Humanitarian Policy (2005).• Aim: Save lives, alleviate suffering and maintain human

dignity.• Guided by international law and humanitarian principles

(humanity, independence, impartiality and neutrality).• Stresses GHD (quick, predictable, flexible, needs-based).• Projects through the UN, Red Cross, NGOs and relevant

authorities. • Appropriation can be used for Disaster Preparedness and

should support transition to recovery and longer-term development.

• Promote the international humanitarian system through contributions to research, method development and capacity development (secondments).

• Assist the MFA in advancing the development of international humanitarian policy.

The Humanitarian Team The Humanitarian Team

Head of Division

Co-ordinator/Deputy Head Co-ordinator/Deputy Head

Programme Officer

Programme Officer

Programme Officer

Programme Officer

Programme Officer

Administrator

Programme Officer

Programme Officer

Programme Officer

Programme Officer

Programme Officer

Administrator

ATHA

Project Leader

Controller

15 persons

16 languages

77 years of field experience

From the Red Cross, UN, NGOs, private sector…

Policy Specialist Human Security

Swedish Humanitarian Swedish Humanitarian AssistanceAssistance

UNITED STATES of AMERICA

CANADA

ALASKA (USA)

MEXICO

COLOMBIA

VENEZUELA

BRAZIL

PERU

BOLIVIA

HONDURAS

NICARAGUA

ECUADOR

GUYANA

SURINAME

FRENCHGUIANA

COSTA RICA

PANAMA

GUATEMALA

CUBA

PARAGUAY

ARGENTINA

URUGUAY

CHILE

GREENLAND

ICELAND

UNITEDKINGDOM

REPULIC OFIRELAND

NORWAY

SWEDEN

FINLAND

DENMARK

ESTONIA

LATVIA

LITHUANIA

POLAND

BELARUS

GERMANY

CZECHREPUBLIC

NETHERLANDS

BELGIUM

FRANCE

SPAIN

PO

RT

UG

AL

SWITZ.

AUSTRIA

SLOVAKIA

HUNGARY

ROMANIA

BULGARIA

ITALY

UKRAINE

TURKEYGREECE

SYRIA

IRAQ

SAUDIARABIA

YEMEN

OMAN

UAE

EGYPTLIBYA

ALGERIA

MOROCCOTUNISIA

WESTERN SAHARA

MAURITANIA

MALINIGER CHAD

SUDAN

ETHIOPIA

SOMALIAUGANDA

SENEGAL

GUINEA

LIBERIA

COTED’IVOIRE

BURKINA

GHANA

NIGERIA

CAMEROON

CENTRALAFRICAN REPUBLIC

GABON CONGO

DEMOCRATICREPUBLIC OF

CONGO

KENYA

TANZANIA

ANGOLA

ZAMBIA

MO

ZAM

BIQUE

NAMIBIA

BOTSWANA

ZIMBABWE

REPUBLICOF SOUTH

AFRICA

MADAGASCAR

RUSSIAN FEDERATION

KAZAKHSTAN

GEORGIA

IRAN

UZBEKISTAN

TURKMENISTAN

AFGHANISTAN

KYRGYZSTAN

TAHKISTAN

PAKISTAN

INDIA

CHINA

NEPAL

MYANMAR

THAILAND

SRILANKA

MONGOLIA

NORTHKOREA

SOUTHKOREA JAPAN

TAIWAN

CAMBODIA

LAOS

VIETNAM

PHILIPPINES

MALAYSIA

INDONESIA

PAPUANEW GUINEA

AUSTRALIA

NEWZEALAND

• Countries with humanitarian projects 2007• Sida field presence• SIda field presence with humanitarian profile

GEORGIA

Geographical divisionGeographical division

UNITED STATES of AMERICA

CANADA

ALASKA (USA)

MEXICO

COLOMBIA

VENEZUELA

BRAZIL

PERU

BOLIVIA

HONDURAS

NICARAGUA

ECUADOR

GUYANA

SURINAME

FRENCHGUIANA

COSTA RICA

PANAMA

GUATEMALA

CUBA

PARAGUAY

ARGENTINA

URUGUAY

CHILE

GREENLAND

ICELAND

UNITEDKINGDOM

REPULIC OFIRELAND

NORWAY

SWEDEN

FINLAND

DENMARK

ESTONIA

LATVIA

LITHUANIA

POLAND

BELARUS

GERMANY

CZECHREPUBLIC

NETHERLANDS

BELGIUM

FRANCE

SPAIN

PO

RT

UG

AL

SWITZ.

AUSTRIA

SLOVAKIA

HUNGARY

ROMANIA

BULGARIA

ITALY

UKRAINE

TURKEYGREECE

SYRIA

IRAQ

SAUDIARABIA

YEMEN

OMAN

UAE

EGYPTLIBYA

ALGERIA

MOROCCOTUNISIA

WESTERN SAHARA

MAURITANIA

MALINIGER CHAD

SUDAN

ETHIOPIA

SOMALIAUGANDA

SENEGAL

GUINEA

LIBERIA

COTED’IVOIRE

BURKINA

GHANA

NIGERIA

CAMEROON

CENTRALAFRICAN REPUBLIC

GABON CONGO

DEMOCRATICREPUBLIC OF

CONGO

KENYA

TANZANIA

ANGOLA

ZAMBIA

MO

ZAM

BIQUE

NAMIBIA

BOTSWANA

ZIMBABWE

REPUBLICOF SOUTH

AFRICA

MADAGASCAR

RUSSIAN FEDERATION

KAZAKHSTAN

GEORGIA

IRAN

UZBEKISTAN

TURKMENISTAN

AFGHANISTAN

KYRGYZSTAN

TAHKISTAN

PAKISTAN

INDIA

CHINA

NEPAL

MYANMAR

THAILAND

SRILANKA

MONGOLIA

NORTHKOREA

SOUTHKOREA JAPAN

TAIWAN

CAMBODIA

LAOS

VIETNAM

PHILIPPINES

MALAYSIA

INDONESIA

PAPUANEW GUINEA

AUSTRALIA

NEWZEALAND

GEORGIA

Sudan: 251 645 000 (12%)DRC: 171 368 000 (8%)oPt: 128 796 000 (6%)Somalia: 115 368 000 (6%)Uganda: 105 275 000 (5%)

Africa

Asia

Europe & Central Asia

Latin America

Global

UN

Red Cross

NGOs

SRSA

World Bank

Allocations 2001 – 2008 Allocations 2001 – 2008 (MSEK)(MSEK)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Anslag

Utbetalt

Year AllocationDisbursed

2001 1 077 1 3062002 930 1 2222003 1 100 1 2622004 1 530 1 6102005 1 942 1 8772006 1 970 2 0122007 2 045 2 0642008 2 010

10 largest partner organisations 10 largest partner organisations 20072007

0

100 000 000

200 000 000

300 000 000

400 000 000

500 000 000

600 000 000

ICRC UNDP Unicef SE RedCross

OCHA FAO SRSA UNRWA Diakonia UNHCR Others

ICRC16%

UNDP13%

Unicef12%

Others25%

SRSA5%

UNRWA3%

Diakonia3%

SE Red Cross11%

OCHA5%

FAO5%

UNHCR2%

Våra uppdragVåra uppdrag

• Sida’s humanitarian support – separate allocation– CAP – Flash Appeals– Red Cross – Minor hum. frames– SRSA – Single projects

• Early recovery with delegated funds• Disaster Risk Reduction and

prevention• Counselling in humanitarian affairs

Guiding PrinciplesGuiding Principles

Humanitarian Policy

Fast, predictable, flexible, needs-based

Sida humanitarian strategy

GoodHumanitarian

Donorship

Save lives, reduce suffering, maintain dignity.Humain, impartial, neutral and independent.

Non-political assistance in politicised environment.Based on needs, no concentration to countries.Sida presence in fewer countries requires new methods.

The Humanitarian VIsionThe Humanitarian VIsion

CompetenceStrengthen the Swedish humanitarian competence through strategic recruitment, secondment and training. +

CapacityIncrease Sweden’s joint humanitarian capacity through strengthening humanitarian competence in the field.

EffectivenessQuick and competens processing of humanitarian projects, i e no reduction of capacity at HQ in Sweden.

Quality

Ascertaining the quality of Swedish humanitarian assistance through:- Knowledge and understanding- Presence and follow-up- Speed and predictability

=

+