59
1 Adult Emergency Department Patients with Acute Asthma and Survey of Local Asthma Centers: 36 th Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration (MARC-36) Study Site Training

Site Training

  • Upload
    torin

  • View
    40

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Adult Emergency Department Patients with Acute Asthma and Survey of Local Asthma Centers: 36 th Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration (MARC-36) Study. Site Training. Web & Audio Meeting. Webinar has no audio function For audio function: Please dial 800-501-8979 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Site Training

1

Adult Emergency Department Patients with Acute Asthma

and Survey of Local Asthma Centers: 36th Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration (MARC-36) Study

Site Training

Page 2: Site Training

Web & Audio Meeting

• Webinar has no audio function

• For audio function:– Please dial 800-501-8979– Then enter the access code (7265276)

2

Page 3: Site Training

3

Study LeadershipCarlos Camargo, MD, DrPH (Principal Investigator)Kohei Hasegawa, MD, MPH (Co-investigator)

Project Coordination: Dr Hasegawa & Ms Sullivan.Funded by a grant from Novartis to MGH (Camargo).

Emergency Medicine Network (www.emnet-usa.org),Dept. of Emergency Medicine, MGH, Boston, MA

Page 4: Site Training

4

1. Overview

2. Chart review

3. Survey

4. REDCap

Outline of Presentation

Page 5: Site Training

5

1. Overview

2. Chart review

3. Survey

4. REDCap

Outline of Presentation

Page 6: Site Training

1. To describe adult ED patients with acute asthma, with a focus on the characteristics of patients with a high number of ED asthma visits in the 12 months before their index visit

Aims

Page 7: Site Training

7

2. To evaluate the concordance of current ED management of acute asthma with the 2007 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guideline.

3. To determine the characteristics of local hospital-affiliated asthma centers and the services they provide.

Aims (continued)

Page 8: Site Training

8

Acute asthma accounts for almost 2 million ED visits/yr, representing a high-risk population.

Our survey of 177 US asthma centers in 2004 demonstrated suboptimal care in the asthma centers

Current data are scarce on the epidemiology of this patient population, asthma care in ED, and the status of asthma centers.

MARC-36 will address these knowledge gaps.

Significance

Page 9: Site Training

Study Design

The MARC-36 study consists of two parts:

1. Chart review of 2,000 ED asthma patients in 50 EDs across the USA

2. Online survey about asthma centers affiliated with participating hospitals

– Conducted by EMNet Coordinating Center

9

Page 10: Site Training

10

1. Overview

2. Chart review

3. Survey

4. REDCAP

Outline of Presentation

Page 11: Site Training

Identification of Visits

• Use ICD-9-CM codes 493.xx to identify all visits with a principal ED or hospital discharge diagnosis of asthma during a 12-month period– Identify 12-month period from January 1, 2011 to

December 31, 2012 (i.e., 24-month window)– We encourage all sites to start with calendar year

2012 (i.e., January 2012 to December 2012) • The ED visit chosen for chart review will be

selected at random from all asthma-related ED visits over the 12-month period

11

Page 12: Site Training

12

1) Asthma ED visit made by adult patient aged 18 to 54 years

AND

2) a history of asthma before the index visit

Inclusion Criteria

Page 13: Site Training

13

1) History of COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis

2) Transfer visits3) Repeat visit by the same subject

-- the visit that was randomly chosen first will be retained for chart review

4) Visits not prompted, in large part, by an asthma exacerbation, per judgment of the chart reviewer

Exclusion Criteria

Page 14: Site Training

Random Sampling

1. Create a list of eligible ED visits during a 12-month period

2. Send the number of eligible visits to EMNet Coordinating Center

3. EMNet will assign randomly-generated Study IDs to the visits, and send a list of them to the site

4. Sites review the charts in order (ie, ID 1, 2, 3, ….) until they have reviewed 40 eligible cases

14

Page 15: Site Training

Random Sampling1. Creating a list at the siteName Visit Date Running Visit #

Carlos Jan 1 1

Carlos May 1 2

Debbie May 1 3

… … …

Kohei Dec 1 70

15

Page 16: Site Training

Random Sampling2. Sending running # to EMNet

Name Visit Date Running #

Carlos Jan 1 1

Carlos May 1 2

Debbie May 1 3

… … …

Kohei Dec 1 70

16

Page 17: Site Training

Random Sampling3. Random ID assigned by EMNet

Running # Study ID

1 23

2 1

3 70

… …

70 2

17

Page 18: Site Training

Random Sampling4. Reviewing charts in order

Name MRN Running # Study ID

Carlos Jan 1 1 23

Carlos May 1 2 1

Debbie May 1 3 70

… … … …

Kohei Dec 1 70 218

Page 19: Site Training

Repeated visits?the visit that was randomly chosen first will be retained for chart review

Name Visit date Running # Study ID

Carlos Jan 1 1 23

Carlos May 1 2 1

Debbie May 1 3 70

… … … …

Kohei Dec 1 70 219

Page 20: Site Training

20

111 01Site-specific 3 digit number

Patient number

Study ID#

0

Page 21: Site Training

21

All data to be entered into Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)

We will review basics of REDCap in the final section of this presentation.

Data Entry: REDCap

Page 22: Site Training

General informationED records vs. Non-ED records• Most of the information should be available in

the ED records

• Some variables may require review of non-ED records, such as primary care physicians, specialists, and hospitalizations

Examples age of first asthma diagnosis, number of hospitalizations, medication non-adherence, laboratory tests, and weight

22

Page 23: Site Training

Decision rules for conflicting results

Among the patient’s records• Inpatient > specialist > PCP > ED record

Between providers within the same visit• Attending > resident > PA/NP > student

23

Page 24: Site Training

No vs. Not Documented/Unknown

• “NO” -- if, after review of all charts, the treatment was not consistently documented– eg, there is the patient medication list and an

inhaled corticosteroid is not listed

• “Not documented/Unknown” -- if insufficient documentation was available to inform the variable– eg, if the medication list is missing, do not

assume “No”

24

Page 25: Site Training

Variables

• Demographics• Past asthma history• Chronic asthma medications• ED presentation• ED treatments• ED disposition• Laboratory testing over 12 mo

25

Page 26: Site Training

26

• Using the Excel sheet (Chart Review Log), enter patient PHI (eg, name, date of birth, medical record number, home ZIP code, visit date)

• Maintain the tracking form locally; do NOT send it to the EMNet Coordinating Center.

Excel Log - Site Use Only

Page 27: Site Training

Season of ED visit

• Date of ED visit is PHI– Collected on Chart Review Log

• Enter the season of ED visit based on the month of ED visit (triage) date– Fall: Sep, Oct, Nov– Winter: Dec, Jan, Feb– Spring: Mar, Apr, May– Summer: June, July, Aug

27

Page 28: Site Training

Median Household Income

• Estimated by ZIP code (=PHI)– ZIP code will be collected on the Chart Review

Log

• Conversion table (ZIP code – Income) will be posted online www.emnet-usa.org/Marc_36/M36_resources.htm

• Please call EMNet Coordinating Center if the patient’s ZIP code is not on the table.

28

Page 29: Site Training

Ethnicity and Race

• Consider ethnicity a separate concept from race

• Hispanic Ethnicity– Enter “Yes” if Hispanic, Latino, Spanish origin– Persons of Hispanic origin may be of any race

• Race (check all that apply)– eg, white, black, Asian, other

29

Page 30: Site Training

Standard Treatment

• Calculate the number of “standard treatments” of inhaled beta-agonist given.

• “Standard treatment” is equal to– 2.5 mg albuterol neb– 4-6 puffs from MDI

• e.g., 10 mg albuterol neb = 4 standard treatments

30

Page 31: Site Training

Practice Charts• Abstractors will complete 2 practice charts

– assessed vs. ‘‘criterion standard’’ • If an abstractor’s accuracy is less than 80% per

chart, the individual will be retrained• After confirming the accuracy >=80%, 40 chart

review can be started.• Online tools will be available

– eg, Manual of Procedures, ZIP-income table, FAQ

31

Page 32: Site Training

Practice Charts (continued)

• Practice charts will be posted online (password-secured).– www.emnet-usa.org/Marc_36/login.cfm

• Enter the data to REDCap (PRACTICE DATABASE)

32

Page 33: Site Training

33

Practice Chart ID #

111 XP1Reviewer initial or # at the study site (you can decide)

Site-specific 3 digit number

Patient number (P1 and P2)

Page 34: Site Training

34

34

1. Overview

2. Chart review

3. Survey

4. REDCap

Outline of Presentation

Page 35: Site Training

Surveys

1. Site survey

2. Asthma center survey (conducted by EMNet Coordinating Center)

35

Page 36: Site Training

1) Site Survey

Online survey of each site will collect data on ED and hospital characteristics, including:– Annual ED visits for acute asthma– Order sets, clinical pathways– Whether or not the hospital has an asthma

center– Contact information of asthma center

director

36

Page 37: Site Training

Asthma center

• A stand-alone clinic focusing on asthma OR

• A usual allergy or pulmonary clinic that has time set aside for preferential scheduling of individuals with asthma.

37

Page 38: Site Training

Surveys

1. Site survey

2. Asthma center survey (conducted by EMNet Coordinating Center)

38

Page 39: Site Training

2) Asthma center survey

• Background: Our survey in 2004 and 2006 showed suboptimal coordination of care w/I asthma centers

• Objective: To determine the characteristics of local hospital-affiliated asthma centers

• Methods: Online survey to asthma center directors, collecting the characteristics (eg, staffing, services available, allergy testing)

• Conducted by EMNet Coordinating Center

39

Page 40: Site Training

40

1. Overview

2. Chart review

3. Survey

4. REDCap

Outline of Presentation

Page 41: Site Training

41

Page 42: Site Training

42

Background

• REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) is a secure, web-based application designed exclusively to support data capture for research studies

• Initiated at Vanderbilt University and includes >600 active institutional partners (http://project-redcap.org/)

Page 43: Site Training

43

Features

• Validation/pop-up alerts to minimize data-entry errors

• Save forms as PDF and print as needed

• No need to transmit data to EMNet Coordinating Center

Page 44: Site Training

44

Getting Started1. Sign User Agreement

2. Send to EMNet

3. Access granted by Partners (MGH)

4. Log in at https://redcap.partners.org

Page 45: Site Training

45

Getting Started (continued)

Page 46: Site Training

46

Data Entry• Select database from “My Projects”

• Use the left-hand toolbar to initiate data entry (Chart Review Form)

Page 47: Site Training

47

Data Entry (continued)

Page 48: Site Training

48

Data Entry (continued)

Use your mouse to move from field to field (Note: pressing “Enter” will save and kick you out of the form)

Do not use the browser arrows to move back and forth between screens/forms

Page 49: Site Training

49

Data Entry (continued)

Page 50: Site Training

50

Changing Responses• “reset value”

• Response changes to questions with branching logic result in a pop-up box asking for confirmation of the change

Page 51: Site Training

Changing Responses (continued)

51

Page 52: Site Training

52

Databases

1. Practice Database

2. Participant Database

Practice databases are available for use and are designated by “PRACTICE” in title

Page 53: Site Training

53

Saving Records• After saving a form, a pop-up box will appear if

a response is missing in a required field

• Return to that field and enter a response

Page 54: Site Training

54

Saving Records (continued)

• After completing blank fields, you are ready to save form as “complete”

Page 55: Site Training

55

Tips• Save your work frequently!

– Before you leave a form– Times out

• REDCap is case sensitive

• Use the comment section to record anything that does not fit into form

Page 56: Site Training

56

REDCap Downtime

Partners or EMNet will communicate scheduled

downtimes (e.g., for system upgrades)

May be unanticipated downtime or other factors that prevent use of REDCap (e.g., problem with local internet connection)

Page 57: Site Training

57

REDCap Questions?

Problems logging in?

Contact Partners HealthCare EDC [email protected]

New user requests, other issues, or questions?Kohei Hasegawa, MD, MPH

[email protected] 617-643-5276

Page 58: Site Training

MARC-36 TimelinesJune 2013 IRB application

TrainingSite survey

July-August 2013(September at latest!)

Chart reviewAsthma center surveyData management

September-October 2013

Site queriesClose database

November 2013 Primary data analysisSAEM abstracts 58

Page 59: Site Training

59

Kohei Hasegawa, MD, MPH [email protected]

Carlos A. Camargo, MD, [email protected] 617-726-5276

Questions?