View
1.499
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 1
Learning Agenda
Define Six Sigma and its key elements The Case for Six Sigma The Six Sigma process: DMAIC
– Exercise to learn • Process variability• Process capability
– Six Sigma Players– Implementation Issues
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 2
Operational Systems: The Basics
The operational system transforms inputs into goods & services.
OUTPUTSINPUTS PROCESS
FEEDBACK
Material flow Information Flow
Improvement objectives: Be more efficient in use of resources in the process Create outputs that lead to greater effectiveness in the market
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 3
What is Six Sigma?
Measurement of variability Program for quality improvement
– Fact-based– Customer-driven
Management system to achieve sustainable competitive advantage
Set of tools for improvement efforts
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 4
What is Six Sigma?
““A comprehensive and flexible system for achieving, A comprehensive and flexible system for achieving, sustaining and maximizing business success. Six sustaining and maximizing business success. Six Sigma is uniquely driven by close understanding of Sigma is uniquely driven by close understanding of customer needs, disciplined use of facts, data and customer needs, disciplined use of facts, data and statistical analysis, and diligent attention to statistical analysis, and diligent attention to managing, improving and reinventing business managing, improving and reinventing business processes.”processes.”
The Six Sigma Way, by Pande, Newman and Cavanaugh
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 5
Six Sigma according to Jack Welch
“A highly disciplined process that helps us focus on developing and delivering near-perfect products and services.
The word Six Sigma is a statistical term that measures how far a given process deviates from perfection.
The central idea behind Six Sigma is that if you can measure how many ‘defects’ you have in a process, you can systematically figure out how to eliminate them and get as close to ‘zero defects’ as possible.
Six Sigma has changed the DNA at GE – it is the way we work – in everything we do and in every product we design.”
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 6
“Lean Six Sigma” at Xerox
By creating a culture that strives to constantly improve and eliminate waste, “event-driven” major restructurings can be avoided.-- Anne Mulcahy, CEO Xerox
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 7
Six Sigma Philosophy
Customer Focused; Build to Critical To Quality (CTQ) criteria determined through listening to Voice of the Customer
Top-down approach Fact-driven, measurement-based Project Oriented Structured problem solving approach Widespread
– Improvement projects become part of everyone’s job
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 8
Who’s Practicing 6 Sigma?
Avery Dennison Dow DuPont Foxboro Sony Deere & Co. Delphi Allied Signal Ford Bose
Johnson & Johnson Caterpillar Lockheed Martin IBM CitiGroup
(Visa/MasterCard) G.E. J.P. Morgan ServiceMaster Eaton
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 9
Six Sigma Players
Senior Management– Openly commit to support the process!
Champions– Manager in the project area
Master Black Belts– Mentors the project teams
Black Belts– Full time team leader, trainer, facilitator
Green Belts– Team members
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 10
Does 6 Sigma matter?
20,000 articles of mail lost each hour
2.6 Sigma = 99% Good
15 minutes of unsafe drinking water every day 5,000 incorrect surgical operations per week 2 short or long landings at most major airports each day
200,000 wrong drug prescriptions each year
6 Sigma = 99.99966% Good7 articles lost per hour
2 minutes unsafe water per year
2 incorrect procedures per week
1 short or long landing every 5 years
68 wrong prescriptions per year
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 11
Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ)
Sigma Level Defects per Million Opportunities Cost of Poor Quality2 398,537 (Noncompetitive Companies) Not applicable3 66,800 25-40% of sales4 6,210 (Industry Average) 15-25% of sales5 233 5-15% of sales6 3.4 (World Class) < 1% of sales
Each sigma shift provides a net income improvement which equals 10% of sales.
Six Sigma, by Harry and Schroeder, p. 17
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 12
Juran’s Cost of Quality Accounting
Prevention AppraisalInternal Failures
External Failures
Costs to prevent failures
•Training
•6 Sigma program management
•Experiments
•Testing
Costs to measure quality levels
•Inspections
•Audits
Costs of failures caught before “shipment”
•Scrap
•Rework
•Equipment down time
Costs of failures in customers’ hands
• Warranty repairs
• Complaint Handling
• Support • Expediting• Recalls• Law Suits• Reputation
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 13
Cost of Quality
How to get people thinking about costs of poor quality:– Suppose all the defects disappeared. – Would the costs in question also disappear? – What other costs would disappear or be reduced?
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 14
Organization Within the Organization
The primary operation that produces your products and services
“Fix-IT” operation that cleans up the defects caused by the primary
Need to fire the Fix-It factory!
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 15
What is Sigma… and why Six?
Lower case, Greek letter S
In statistics, the standard deviation of a distribution of data
Measures the variability, dispersion, or spread of the data around the mean (average) of the data
Sigma
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 16
Variability explained…
Look at the bottle of water (or soda) in front of you (Let’s assume it’s a 12-ounce bottle.)
Is it exactly 12.00000000000000000 ounces????– No, it’s probably slightly above or slightly below 12
ounces Take all the bottles in the room and weigh the
contents. We would have a set of data with – Mean or average around 12– Distribution of the data around the mean– … And a wet room
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 17
Variability explained… with pictures
X or sample mean~12.0 ounces
measures the spread of the distribution
The lower the value, the more tightly clustered the values around
the mean
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 18
Variability explained… with pictures
X~12.0 ounces
Let’s assume = 0.05 oz.
+312.15 oz.
-311.85 oz.
99.74%
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 19
Describing a distribution
-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 x +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 68.26%
95.44%99.74%99.993%
99.9993%
99.99966%
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 20
Let’s Switch Gears… from the observed result to the goal
Who cares about the distribution?– The customer! (And probably The Government!)
– Therefore, so does (should!) the bottler Implications for business practice
– Design Specification Limits – Upper and Lower – for the amount of water that should be in each bottle. (Let’s assume it’s 12 +/- 0.1 oz)
Target12.0 ounces
UDS12.1 oz
LDS11.9 oz
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 21
Compare Design Specifications to Process Variability
X~12.0 ounces
= 0.05 oz.
Design Spec = 12 +/- 0.1 oz.
+312.15 oz.
-311.85 oz.
UDS12.1 oz
LDS11.9 oz
Conclusion: A 3-sigma process is not capable of
meeting specifications
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 22
3 Sigma versus 6 Sigma
UDSLDS X or sample mean~12.0 ounces
A 6 process is more
capable and thus more
likely to be defect free
3 compared to specs
6 compared to specs
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 23
Inherent Capability Analysis
Determine the inherent capability of the process to produce goods at some quality level.– Gather historical data on a process– By convention, if most output (99.74% = +/-3falls
within Design Specs, then process is deemed capable– But good can get better!
Six-Sigma Quality Level– When 12 output (+/- 6falls within Design Specs
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 24
Process Capability Ratio
Upper specification - Lower specificationCp = --------------------------------------------------
6
This works fine if… the mean of the output is the same
as the target specification.
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 25
Compare Design Specifications to Process Variability
X11.92 oz.
+312.07 oz.
-311.77 oz.
UDS12.1 oz
LDS11.9 oz
= 0.05 oz.
Design Spec = 12 +/- 0.1 oz.
Note that mean of the output
does not match the target
specification.
target12.0 oz
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 26
Process Capability Index
Cpk = Minimum of
Upper specification – x3
x – Lower specification3
,=
=
X-double-bar = mean output of the process, not the target specification
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 27
DefineOpportunity
AnalyzeCauses
ImproveSolutions
ControlSustain
MeasureSymptoms
DefineProgram
Description
MeasureNeeds &
Req’ts
AnalyzeHigh Level
Design
DesignDetailedDesign
VerifyRoll-Out
& Control
DMAIC
Charter Performance Drivers Actions Controls
Six Sigma’s 2 Key Methodologies: DMAIC & DMADV
DMADV
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 28
Why Two Methodologies?
Six Sigma initially focused on current processes– DMAIC– A variation of the Deming Wheel:
Plan – Do – Check - Act Yet…
– The design phase drives life-cycle costs– DMADV– Sometimes called Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 29
DMAIC Step 1: Define
Identify our internal and external customers
– Determine what our customers want
– Critical To Quality (CTQs) characteristics
Identify our suppliers– Determine what we need
from our suppliers
Identify problems– Identify the process that
contributes to the problems
Identify improvement opportunities– Pareto Analysis
Scope the improvement project
Select the right players Set goals and objectives
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 30
DMAIC Step 2: Measure
Review the current process– Process mapping
Develop metrics for that best describe the current and desired states
– Performance– Cost
Metrics must align with indicators of business success
Train team members on data collection and analysis
Collect data Organize data Evaluate the performance of
the process– Defects– Cycle time– Other relevant measures
Determine degree of process variation
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 31
DMAIC Step 3: Analyze
Identify issues that occur at each step in the process
Assess customer impact of problems
Root Cause Analysis improvement opportunities
– Methods (processes)– Machines (technology)– Manpower (people)– Materials (data,
instructions)
Assess the effect on outputs or performance
Generate potential solutions
Target best candidates
Tools– Control Charts– Cause-and-Effect Diagrams– Flowcharts– Run Charts– Scatter Diagrams, etc.
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 32
Fishbone Cause-and-Effect Diagram
Problem Outcome
MethodMethod Machines
MaterialsManpower
Organizational tool for approaching the
problem
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 33
DMAIC Step 4: Improve
Develop Action Items
Prioritize areas to attack
Pilot test solutions
Refine solutions
Document solutions
Implement solutions
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 34
DMAIC Step 5: Control
Beware of lapses!
Measure progress
Quantify benefits of the improvements in financial terms by the bean counters
Document the project; debrief for learning experiences
Communicate for organizational learning
Recognize the team’s efforts and success
Monitor and manage to hold gains
Adjust for continuous improvement
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 35
Statistical Process Control Charts
Capable processes also must be controlled SPC attempts to distinguish 2 types of variability
– Normal (Random) variability– Abnormal (Structural) variability
How to apply SPC– Construct charts (and update occasionally!)– Collect data regularly applying sampling plan– Observations outside of limits indicate the process
potentially is “out of control”- statistically speaking– Find Assignable Causes to improve operation
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 36
Control Charts
Attribute Control Charts (assumes normal distribution)– Variability of some physical measure (weight, distance, time)– Mean – Range Chart = standard deviation
p - chart (assumes binomial distribution), More applicable to services.– Proportion or fraction defective = SQRT [p*(1 - p)/n]
c – chart (assumes Poisson distribution)– Characteristics, also known as defective chart = SQRT (mean)
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 37
Developing Control Charts
Identify the process you want to study Check whether the process is running OK Collect sample data (more is better) For each sample, calculate the Mean and the Range After taking sufficient samples, calculate mean of the
sample means and the ranges Upper Control Limit (UCL) = Mean + 3*Std.Dev. Lower Control Limit (LCL) = Mean – 3*Std.Dev.
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 38
Statistical Process Control Charts
Upper Control Limit
Lower Control Limit
1 2 3 4 5 6
Observation Number over time
x
xx
x
x
x
xx
7 8
Center line
These are “out of control” – search for Assignable Causes
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 39
Product Reliability
Reliability = Reliability = product product of reliability of componentsof reliability of components
rrss = (= (rr11)()(rr22) . . . () . . . (rrnn))wherewhere
rrss = = reliability of the complete productreliability of the complete product
nn = = number of subsystemsnumber of subsystemsrrnn = = reliability of the subsystem or reliability of the subsystem or component component nn
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 40
Let’s Build a Product
2”
5” Production Process• One person cuts strips for
each color• One person glues each
color strip onto graph paper in order shown
Measurements• Length & width of green
strips (at midpoint)• Placement of red strip
1
2
3
4
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 42
The Results
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 43
Six Sigma Organizational Fit
Ready for Six Sigma– Willingness to change– Healthy self-criticism– Flat organization structure– Rewards for intelligence
and creativity– Rigorous strategic planning– Ability to measure client
satisfaction, market share, cost, and productivity
Not Ready for Six Sigma– Resistance to change– Blame/credit mentality– Rigid, hierarchical
organization structure– Low appreciation of staff– Inability to dedicate project
resources– Inability to measure
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 44
Where do you Start?
Processes/operations with – Impact of the process on customer satisfaction– Current wide variance– Ease of defining “opportunity” and “defect”– Clear improvement opportunities– “Ease” of measurement
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 45
Total Quality Management
TQM is a management approach to long term success through customer satisfaction
TQM is based on the participation of all members of an organization in improving processes, products, services, and the culture they work in.
TQM benefits all organization members and society.– American Society of Quality
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 46
Six Sigma vs. Lean – Complementary
Six Sigma Remove variation from
processes to achieve uniform flow
Problem/project focus Research projects with
longer timeline (3-4 months)
Higher complexity with root cause unknown
Lean Remove waste, rework,
inventory to reduce flow time
Flow focused– Remove bottlenecks– Material velocity
Immediate results(1-2 weeks)
Low complexity with known solutions
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 47
Lean Production
JIT production (cellular manufacturing) Heijunka: Level workloading Pursuit of perfection Visual process management Empowered teams Kaizen: Continuous improvement involving everyone Poka Yoke: mechanism to stop defects or make errors
obvious
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 48
Other Kaizen Tools: 5 Ss
Step Name Action Catch Phrase
1 SortRemove unnecessary items
from the workplace “When in doubt, throw it out”
2 StraightenLocate everything at the point
of use “A place for everything, and everything in its place”
3 SweepClean and eliminate the
sources of filth “The best cleaning is to not need cleaning”
4 StandardizeMake routine and standard for
what good looks like “See and recognize what needs to be done”
5 Self-disciplineSustain by making 5S second
nature “The less self-discipline you need, the better”
Source: http://www.kaizen-consulting.com/training_5s.htm
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 49
Mudas – 7 WastesThe 7 Wastes – Definition Examples Causes Countermeasures
Over-|production Producing more than the customer needs right now
Producing product to stock based on sales forecastsProducing more to avoid set-upsBatch process resulting in extra output
ForecastingLong set-ups“Just in case” for breakdowns
Pull system schedulingHeijunka – level loadingSet-up reductionTPM
Trans-portation
Movement of product that does not add value
Moving parts in and out of storageMoving material from one workstation to another
Batch productionPush productionStorageFunctional layout
Flow linesPull systemValue Stream organizationsKanban
Motion Movement of people that does not add value
Searching for parts, tools, prints, etc.Sorting through materialsReaching for toolsLifting boxes of parts
Workplace disorganizationMissing itemsPoor workstation designUnsafe work area
5SPoint of Use StorageWater SpiderOne-piece flowWorkstation design
Waiting Idle time created when material, information, people, or equipment is not ready
Waiting for partsWaiting for printsWaiting for inspectionWaiting for machinesWaiting for informationWaiting for machine repair
Push productionWork imbalanceCentralized inspectionOrder entry delaysLack of priorityLack of communication
Downstream pullTakt time productionIn-process gaugingJidokaOffice KaizenTPM
Processing Effort that adds no value from the customer’s viewpoint
Multiple cleaning of partsPaperworkOver-tight tolerancesAwkward tool or part design
Delay between processingPush systemCustomer voice not understoodDesigns “thrown over the wall”
Flow linesOne-piece pullOffice KaizenLean Design
Inventory More materials, parts, or products on hand than the customer needs right now
Raw materialsWork in processFinished goodsConsumable suppliesPurchased components
Supplier lead-timesLack of flowLong set-upsLong lead-timesPaperwork in processLack of ordering procedure
External kanbanSupplier developmentOne-piece flow linesSet-up reductionInternal kanban
Defects Work that contains errors, rework, mistakes or lacks something necessary
ScrapReworkDefectsCorrectionField failureVariationMissing parts
Process failureMis-loaded partBatch processInspect-in qualityIncapable machines
GembaSigmaPokayokeOne-piece pullBuilt-in quality3PJidoka
Source: www.Gemba.Com
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 50
Bibliography
The Six Sigma Way (ISBN 0-07-135806-4) by Pande, Neuman, and Cavanaugh
The Power of Six Sigma (ISBN 0-7931-4434-5) by Subir Chowdhury
Six Sigma (ISBN 0-385-49437-8) by Harry and Schroeder.
The Six Sigma Handbook (ISBN 0-07-137233-4) by Pyzdek is more technical and becoming the 'handbook' for Black Belts.
The Machine that Changed the World, James Womack
www.6-sigma.com www.sixsigma.co.uk www.sixsigmasystems.com www.isixsigma.com www.shawresources.com/pdf/Choosi
ng%20a%20Quality%20Improvement%20Methodology.pdf
www.ge.com/en/commitment/quality/whatis.htm
http://www.swmas.co.uk/Lean_Tools/The_7_Wastes.php
http://www.kaizen-consulting.com/training_7w.htm
© Fred Van Bennekom, Great Brook, 2004 Slide 51
More References
http://www.strategosinc.com/just_in_time.htm– A GREAT summary of manufacturing improvement concepts from Ford
to lean. A MUST READ. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item.jhtml?id=2646&t=operations http://www.kaizen-consulting.com/training_5s.htm http://www.kaizen-consulting.com/training_7w.htm
– This site from Gemba Research does a nice job of summarizing lots of the TPS tools and concepts.