Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    1/12

    Resistivity 2-D Survey

    School : SK Sg. SiongDistrict : SibuSurvey Date : 24 th and 25 th January 2010Prepared by : Kevin Carradine ak Atet and Mohd SazalyBasarianChecked by : 1. Mohd. Rizal Abd. Rashid

    2. Khairul Rizzal Roslan

    Figure 1. SK. Sg. Siong survey layout plan

    Dininghall

    Pumphouse

    Quarters

    Toilet

    Football field

    Classroom

    Q u a r t e r s

    Q u a r t e r s

    Q u a r t e r s

    ToiletWater tank

    Tank 3

    Tank 2

    ExistingTubewell

    Tank 1

    C l a s s r o o m

    S m

    a l l r o c k y r o a d

    School gate

    School gate

    0m

    400m

    0m400m

    0m200m

    0m 400m

    0m

    200m 0m

    200m

    Line 1

    Line 2

    Line 3

    Line 4

    Line 5

    Line 6

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    2/12

    RESULT AND INTERPRETATIONSK SG. SIONG, SIBU

    LINE 1: POLE DIPOLE LS ARRAY

    Figure 2: Pseudosection profile for Line 1

    Figure 3: Pseudosection profile for Line 1 with topography.

    sand Clayey sandmixture

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    3/12

    This survey line was stretched 400 metres and cut across the football field of SK Sg. Siong. The surface ismainly covered by clayey sand mixture. Underneath the football field shows high resistivity indicate sandon the subsurface.RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

    SK SG. SIONG, SIBULINE 2: POLE DIPOLE LS ARRAY

    Figure 4: Pseudosection profile for Line 2.

    Figure 5: Pseudosection profile for Line 2 with topography.

    Clayey sand

    Saturated zone

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    4/12

    This survey line intersects with line 1 and parallel to the nearby river. Penetration depth is up to 140.7metres. Clayey sand is found at depth 17.9 metres until 140.7 metres. Saturated zone is believed to get itsrecharge from the nearby river.RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

    SK SG. SIONG, SIBULINE 3: POLE DIPOLE S ARRAY

    Figure 6: Pseudosection profile for Line 3.

    Figure 7: Pseudosection profile for Line 3 with topography.

    Intersect withLine 5

    Intersect withLine 1

    Intersect withLine 6

    bedrock Saturated zone

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    5/12

    This survey line intersects line 1, line 5 and line 6. Its penetration depth is up to 87.9 metres. From thispseudosection, underneath this survey line is mostly clayey sand (dark blue to dark green in colour).

    RESULTS AND INTERPRETATIONSK SG. SIONG, SIBU

    LINE 4: POLE DIPOLE S ARRAY

    Figure 8: Pseudosection profile for Line 4.

    Figure 9: Pseudosection profile for Line 4 with topography.

    Intersect with

    Line 5

    Intersect with

    Line 1Intersect withLine 6

    Saturated zone

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    6/12

    This survey line intersects line 5, line 1 and line 6. Generally this area is covered by clay and sand mixture.

    RESULTS AND INTERPRETATIONSK SG. SIONG, SIBU

    LINE 5: POLE DIPOLE S ARRAY

    Figure 10: Pseudosection profile for Line 5.

    Figure 11: Pseudosection profile for Line 5 with topography.

    Saturated area

    Intersect withLine 2

    Intersect withLine 3

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    7/12

    This survey line lies across the football field parallel to Line 1. Subsurface penetration is up to 77.5 metres.Subsurface features here is mainly covered by clayey sand (light green to dark green in colour).RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

    SK SG. SIONG, SIBULINE 6: POLE DIPOLE S ARRAY

    Figure 12: Pseudosection profile for Line 6.

    Figure 13: Pseudosection profile for Line 6 with topography.

    Intersect with

    Line 3

    Intersect withLine 2

    Saturated zone

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    8/12

    This survey line is set up parallel to the line 1 and line 5. Subsurface penetration is up to 87.9 metres andits feature here is mainly covered by clayey sand (light green to dark green in colour). This line proves thatunderneath school area have potential for fresh groundwater.TUBEWELL PROPOSAL

    SK SG. SIONG, SIBULINE 6: POLE DIPOLE S ARRAY

    Figure 14: Pseudosection profile for tubewell proposal at Line 6.

    Site Resistivity (m)Water TypePosibilities Survey Line

    ProposedTubewell (Along

    Survey Line)

    Depth of Tubewell

    SK Sg. Siong,Sibu 10 - 120 Groundwater (fresh)

    Line 6PDP4S

    85 mN 0227.56.8E11157.14.8

    40 m 50 m

    Proposed Tubewell (PW1)

    N 0227.56.8E11157.14.8

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    9/12

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    10/12

    TUBEWELL PROPOSALSK SG. SIONG, SIBU

    LINE 3: POLE DIPOLE S ARRAY

    Figure 16: Pseudosection profile for tubewell proposal at line 3.

    Site Resistivity (m)Water TypePosibilities Survey Line

    ProposedTubewell (Along

    Survey Line)

    Depth of Tubewell

    SK Sg. Siong,Sibu 10 - 120 Groundwater (fresh)

    Line 3PDP4S

    115 mN 0227.56.2E 11157.13.3

    50 m 60 m

    Interpretation:All of this line provides a visible data in search for fresh groundwater. Resistivity value from 10m to120m (blue colour to green colour) in pseudosection indicate there is fresh groundwater underneath.

    Comment:

    Proposed Tubewell (PW3)

    N 0227.56.2E 11157.13.3

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    11/12

    Existing tubewell cannot yield enough water since its screen pipe has collapsed. Proposed well is located40 meters from existing tubewell.

  • 8/7/2019 Sk Sg. Siong Soil Test

    12/12

    SITE PHOTOS

    School Signboard

    Terrameter SAS4000 setup

    Remote Cable Layout