+Small-Scale Channel Modeling

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    1/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel ModelingKlaus Witrisal

    [email protected]

    Signal Processing and Speech Communication Laboratory

    www.spsc.tugraz.at

    Graz University of Technology

    November 14, 2006

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 1/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Outline

    3-1 Introduction Mathematical models forcommunications channels

    3-2 Stochastic Modeling of Fading Multipath ChannelsMultipath channelFading amplitude distribution (Rayleigh, Rice)WSSUS stochastic channel descriptionJakes Doppler spectrumExponential delay spectrum (power delay prole)

    3-3 Classication of Small-Scale Fading

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 2/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    2/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    ReferencesA. F. Molisch: Wireless Communications , 2005, Wiley

    J. G. Proakis: Digital Communications , 4th ed., 2000, McGraw Hill

    J. R. Barry, E. A. Lee, D. G. Messerschmitt: Digital Communication , 3rd ed., 2004,Kluwer

    A. Paulraj, R. Nabar, and D. Gore: Introduction to Space-Time Wireless Communications , 2003, Cambridge

    T. S. Rappaport: Wireless Communications Principles and Practice , 2nd ed., 2002,Prentice Hall

    M. Ptzold: Mobile Fading Channels , 2002, Wiley

    Figures (partly) extracted from these references

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 3/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Channel Models

    Signal processing channel models can be describedfor different interfaces

    Application/ design objective determines choice ofappropriate model

    basebandmodulation

    carriermodulation

    011011bit stream baseband

    signal(analog)

    radio channel

    propagationchannel

    baseband equivalent radio channel

    sampled baseband equivalent radio channel

    carrier de-modulation baseband

    signal(analog)

    (matched)filter

    thresholddetector

    010011bit streamsampling

    (detection)

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 4/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    3/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Additive Noise Channel

    Simplest model transmitted (TX) signal corrupted byadditive noise

    r (t) = s (t) + n (t)

    s(t) ... TX signalcan be bandpass (passband)

    s(t) = 2 {s l(t)e j 2f c t}or (lowpass equivalent) baseband signal s

    l(t)

    (i.e. complex envelope of s(t))

    r (t) ... received (RX) signal

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 5/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Additive Noise Channel (contd)

    Noise is usually modeled as white, Gaussian (additivewhite Gaussian noise AWGN)

    n ( ) = N 02( ) F S n (f ) = N 02

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 6/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    4/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Additive Noise Channel (contd)

    Sampled AWGN model

    r [k] = s [k] + n[k]

    Noise characterization (for complex baseband)

    E{n[k]n[l]}= 2n [k l]

    n[k] is zero-mean circularly symmetric complexGaussian (ZMCSCG)

    Real and imaginary components are i.i.d.(independent, identically distributed)2n depends on (matched) lter at receiverfront-endReal and imaginary components have 2n / 2

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 7/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Linear lter channel

    For time- in variant channels

    r (t) = s(t)c(t) + n(t)

    = c( )s(t )d + n(t)c(t) ... impulse response of linear lter

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 8/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    5/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Linear lter channel (contd)

    Sampled case

    y[k] =L 1

    l=0

    h[l]s[k l] + n[k]

    h[k] incorporatesTX pulse shapeRX (matched) lterphysical channel

    n[k] ... AWGN (ZMCSCG)

    This is actually an equivalent, whitened matched lter(WMF) channel model [Barry/Lee/Messerschmitt]

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 9/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Linear time-variant lterchannel

    Characterized by time-variant channel impulseresponse (CIR) c( ; t)

    response of channel at time tto an impulse transmitted at time t

    ... elapsed time, age variabler (t) = s(t)c( ; t) + n(t)

    =

    c( ; t)s(t )d + n(t)

    model for multipath propagation

    c( ; t) =

    i=0 i(t)( i(t)) (1)

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 10/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    6/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Linear time-variant lter ch.

    [g 5-4 Rap]Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 11/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Stochastic modeling of fadingmultipath channels

    Motivated by their randomly time-variant nature andlarge number of multipath components

    Skip noise

    Derivation of lowpass equivalent CIR from (1)

    cl( ; t) =

    i=0 i(t)e

    j 2f c i (t)( i(t))

    =

    i=0

    i(t)e j i (t)(

    i(t)) (2)

    considering discrete multipath componentsphase term i(t) varies dramatically

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 12/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    7/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Fading of an unmodulatedcarrier

    TX signal is unmodulated carrier (CW) s l(t) = 1

    RX signalr l(t) =

    i=0 i(t)e j i (t)

    sum of vectors (phasors)amplitudes i(t) change slowlyphases i (t) change by 2 if:

    i changes by 1/f ci.e.: path length changes by wavelength

    model r l(t) as a random process!

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 13/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Fading of an unmodulatedcarrier (contd)

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 14/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    8/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Fading of an unmodulatedcarrier (contd)

    Modeling r l(t) as a random process:

    large number of multipath components are addedby central limit theorem (CLT):

    r l(t) is complex Gaussian(CIR cl( ; t) is complex Gaussian in t-variable)

    r l(t) has random phase and amplitude

    in absence of dominant component:r l(t) is zero-mean complex Gaussian

    its envelope |r l(t)| is Rayleigh distributedRayleigh fading channel

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 15/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Fading of an unmodulatedcarrier (contd)

    Rayleigh distribution:

    f R (r ) =r

    2 e

    r 2 / (2 2 ) for r

    0

    characterized by 2: variance of underlying Gaussianprocesses

    derivation of Rayleigh distribution ...

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 16/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    9/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Fading of an unmodulatedcarrier (contd)

    central chi-square PDF Rayleigh PDFof n degrees of freedom characterized by

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 17/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Fading of an unmodulatedcarrier (contd)

    in presence of a dominant component:r l(t) is non-zero-mean complex Gaussian

    its envelope

    |r

    l(t)

    |is Ricean distributed

    Ricean fading channel

    Ricean distribution:

    f R (r ) =r

    2e

    r 2 + s 2

    2 2 I 0rs2

    for r 0I 0(x) ... zero-order modied Bessel function of rst kindcharacterized by2 ... variance of underlying Gaussian processes ands2 = m21 + m22 ... power of mean (i.e. s2 = |E{r l(t)}|2)

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 18/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    10/21

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    11/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Time-selective fading

    Characterization of the time variability

    s l(t) = 1 r l(t) = cl( ; t)1 = cl(t) =

    i=0 i(t)e j i (t)

    Characterize autocorrelation function of cl(t)assume cl(t) is complex Gaussianassume cl(t) is wide-sense stationary (WSS)

    Dene: spaced-time correlation function

    c( t) = E {c

    l (t)cl(t + t)}F

    S c( )Doppler power spectrum S c( ) =

    c( t)e j 2 td t

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 21/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Time-selective fading (contd)

    Doppler power spectrum: average power output of channelas a function of Doppler frequency

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 22/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    12/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Time-selective fading (contd)

    [Rappaport g. 5-1]Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 23/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Time-selective fading (contd)

    Jakes model for Dopplerpower spectrum

    assumes mobile movingat const. velocity vuniformly distributedscattering around mobile

    Jakes Doppler spectrum:

    S c( ) =1

    1

    2max

    2

    (for normalized power)1 0.5 0 0.5 10

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    normalized Doppler frequency / max

    D o p p

    l e r p o w e r s p e c t r a

    l d e n s i

    t y

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 24/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    13/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Time-selective fading (contd)

    Characterization of time-selective fading by parameters

    RMS Doppler spread rms = 2 2

    second centralized moment of normalized Doppler PSD

    mean and mean squared Doppler spread

    = S c( )d

    S c( )d 2

    = 2S c( )d

    S c( )d Coherence time

    T c 1

    rms

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 25/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Frequency-selective fading

    of a (time-invariant) multipath channel

    Characterization of the time dispersion

    s l(t) = (t) r l(t) = cl( ; t)(t) =

    i=0 i(t)e j i (t )(t i(t))

    =

    i=0 ie j i (t i)

    ACF: Uncorrelated scattering assumption:

    E{cl ( 1)cl( 2)}= S c( 1)( 1 2)S c( ) ... multipath intensity prole (= delay powerspectrum; = average power delay prole)

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 26/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    14/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Frequency-selective fading(contd)

    Time-dispersion implies frequency-selectivityEquivalent channel characterization by channeltransfer function (TF) C l(f )

    cl( )F

    C l(f ) =

    cl( )e

    j 2f d

    ACF of channel TF

    S c( )F

    C ( f ) = E {C

    l (f )C l(f + f )}C ( f ) ... spaced-frequency correlation function

    TF C l(f ) is wide-sense stationary (WSS in f ) if CIRcl( ) fullls uncorrelated scattering (US in )

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 27/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Frequency-selective fading(contd)

    Channel IR vs. channel TF

    20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

    115

    110

    105

    100

    95

    90

    85

    80

    75

    70

    65

    IDFT of transfer function after correction for linear phase shift

    excess delay time [ns]

    a m p

    l i t u

    d e

    [ d B ]

    0 200 400 600 800 10004

    2

    0

    2

    4

    frequency [MHz]

    p h a s

    e a r g

    ( H ( f ) ) [ r a

    d ]

    phase transfer function (corrected for linear phase shift)

    0 200 400 600 800 100090

    80

    70

    60

    50

    frequency [MHz]

    a m p

    l i t u

    d e

    | H ( f ) | [ d B ]

    amplitude transfer function

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 28/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    15/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Frequency-selective fading(contd)

    Multipath intensity prole: average power output of channelas a function of delay

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 29/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Frequency-selective fading(contd)

    Characterization by parameters

    RMS delay spread

    rms = 2 2second centralized moment of normalized multipathintensity prole

    mean and mean squared delay spread

    = S c( )d

    S c( )d

    2 = 2S c( )d

    S c( )d

    Coherence bandwidth

    Bc 1

    rmsMobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 30/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    16/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Frequency-selective fading(contd)

    Characterization of mul-tipath intensity prole(simplied; suitable forindoor channels)

    Exponentiallydecaying part

    Line-of-sight (LOS)componentDened by channelparameters

    Channel parameters: total power P 0 K-factor (rel. strength of LOS) RMS delay spread (duration)

    P h (t ) [dB]

    t

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 31/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    The WSSUS channel

    joint modeling oftime dispersion (= frequency selectivity)and time variability (= Doppler spread)

    Dene: ACF of time-variant CIR cl( ; t)

    E{c

    l ( 1; t)cl( 2; t + t)}= c( 1; t)( 1 2)assumes:

    time-variations are wide-sense stationary (WSS)attenuation and phase shifts are independent at 1and 2: uncorrelated scattering (US)

    for t = 0 : c( ; t) = c( ) multpath intensity prole

    c( ; t) ... lagged-time correlation functionMobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 32/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    17/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    The WSSUS channel (contd)

    An equivalent representation of the t-var. CIR cl( ; t):

    Time-variant channel transfer function (TF) C l(f ; t)

    cl( ; t)F

    C l(f ; t) =

    cl( ; t)e

    j 2f d

    from US property follows WSS in f -domain

    equivalent characterization (ACF)

    C ( f ; t) = E {C l (f ; t)C l(f + f ; t + t)}spaced-frequency spaced-time correlation function(WSSWSS!)

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 33/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    The WSSUS channel (contd)time- and frequency-selective transfer function

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    01

    23

    4

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    30

    frequency

    time

    r e c e

    i v e

    d p o w e r

    [ d B ]

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 34/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    18/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    The WSSUS channel (contd)

    Equivalent representations : time-variant systemfunctions Bello functions [Bello63]

    cl( ; t) and C l(f ; t) and two more Fouriertransformed functions w.r.t. t and f

    Equivalent (2-nd order) characterizations : correlationfunctions of Bello functions

    c( ; t) and C ( f ; t) and two more Fouriertransformed functions w.r.t. t and f

    overview shown on next slide

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 35/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    The WSSUS channel (contd) h( )

    multipath intensity profiledelay power spectrum

    max max. delay spread

    H ( f )spaced-frequencycorrelation function

    ( f )c coherence bandwidth

    h( ; t )delay cross-power spectraldensity

    H ( f ; t )spaced-frequency, spaced-time correlation function

    H ( t )spaced-time correlationunction

    ( t )c coherence time

    S H ( ) Doppler power spectrum

    m max. Doppler freq.;Doppler spread

    S H ( f ; ) Doppler cross-power spectral density

    S( ; )Scattering function

    h( ;t )equivalent lowpasstime-variant impulse response

    H ( f ;t )time-variant

    transfer functionFT

    ( f )

    FT( f )

    ACF(WSSUS)

    ACF(WSSWSS)

    FT( f )

    FT( t )

    FT( t )

    FT( t )

    FT( f )

    t = 0 t = 0

    f = 0

    f = 0

    wide-band characterization(time-invariant channel)

    characterization of timevariations (narrow-band)

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 36/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    19/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    The WSSUS channel (contd)

    Doppler-delay scattering function

    [Paulraj; g 2-9] Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 37/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Channel as a space-timerandom eld

    Homogenous (HO) channel is (locally) stationary inspace

    characterization:E{cl ( ; t; d )cl( ; t; d + d )}= d ( ; t; d )

    agrees with discrete scattering model: eachscatterer has discrete ToA i and AoA i

    space-angle transform: assume d lies on x-axis;parameterized by x (and dropping t)

    cl( ; x) =

    cl( ; )e j 2 sin( ) x

    d we may dene the angle-delay scattering functionS c( ; )

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 38/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    20/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Channel as a space-timerandom eld (contd)

    Angle-delay scattering function

    [Paulraj; g 2-10]Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 39/41

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    Channel as a space-timerandom eld (contd)

    S c( ) ... angle power spectrum : average power vs. angleof arrival

    Characterization by parameters:

    RMS angle spread: rms = 2 2second centralized moment of normalized angle powerspectrum

    mean and mean squared angle spread

    = S c( )d

    S c( )d 2

    = 2S c( )d

    S c( )d Coherence distance Dc

    1 rms

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 40/41

  • 8/6/2019 +Small-Scale Channel Modeling

    21/21

    GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

    Signal Processing and Speech Communications Lab

    3-3 Classication ofSmall-Scale Fading

    Compares system and channel parameters

    Classication w.r.t. symbol period w.r.t. bandwidthT s Bs 1/T s

    dispersivenessat fading T s rms Bs Bcfrequency selective T s < rms Bs > B ctime variationsslow fading T s T c Bs rmsfast fading T s > T c Bs < rms

    Mobile Radio Systems Small-Scale Channel Modeling p. 41/41