Upload
lynhi
View
220
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Harvey Jairaj, Engineering Manager, Eskom Holdings Limited, South Africa
18 - 22 May 2009CTICC, Cape Town,
SOUTH AFRICA
Smart power choicesfor Africa
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
CONTENTS
•Introduction•Mothballed durations of Units•Camden Vote•Highlights•Lowlights•Lessons learnt•Questions
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Camden Power Station is situated near Ermelo in South East MpumalangaStation was commissioned in April 1967 and the last of eight units was commissioned in 1969 The plant was mothballed during 1985 to 1989 and returned to service (RTS) over the period March 2005 to September 2008 in order to satisfy future electrical energy demands
Introduction
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Eskom has set itself the target of achieving for Camden Power Station an availability of91% in the long term, based on 6% outage for planned maintenance and 3% for unscheduled outage. The planned RTS Station overall performance parameters are stated as:•98 x 200MW capacity Units (190MW S/out)•9Minimum annual load factor 25%•9Operating Regime is Load Following•9Unit Capability Factor (UCF) Winter 90%•9Unit Capability Factor (UCF) Overall 85%
Intro Cont.
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Camden Power Station (1600 MW)Consist of 8 x 200 MW units First unit commissioned in 1967Last unit commissioned in 1969Mothballed during 1990’s
Return To Service (RTS)Capacity constraints Engineering phase on site started mid 2002First unit 6 successfully RTS on 16 July 2005
Intro Cont.
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Mothballed Periods of Units
15.518-May-0605-Dec-908Camden
14.931-Oct-0505-Dec-907Camden
14.331-Mar-0501-Dec-906Camden
15.803-Sep-0604-Dec-905Camden
17.022-Jan-0701-Feb-904Camden
17.016-Jul-0727-Jul-903Camden
18.031-Jan-0801-Feb-902Camden
18.303-Jun-0801-Feb-901Camden
Years off loadRTS synch
dateActual Start
DateUnitStation
15.518-May-0605-Dec-908Camden
14.931-Oct-0505-Dec-907Camden
14.331-Mar-0501-Dec-906Camden
15.803-Sep-0604-Dec-905Camden
17.022-Jan-0701-Feb-904Camden
17.016-Jul-0727-Jul-903Camden
18.031-Jan-0801-Feb-902Camden
18.303-Jun-0801-Feb-901Camden
Years off loadRTS synch
dateActual Start
DateUnitStation
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Original Vote2003 was R4,029 Billion
Revised Vote 1June 2006 was R5,204 Billion
Current revised vote 2December 2007 is R6,061Billion
Camden Vote
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Successfully commissioned all 8 units. 8 units are out of its defects period Availability and reliability of commissioned units have improvedUnit 8 broke all previous non commercial and post commercial run records without tripping. (97 days)Relationship between CED and GX has improved and is good
Highlights
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Highlights Cont.
No fatalities recorded on the whole project Better understanding of the Grid Code requirementsHighly skilled and experienced staff available for other CED projectsCED and contractors achieved 2m DI free man hoursNo major incidents recorded
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Work stoppage from Inspector Of Machinery High percentage of rework in certain areasNot meeting contractual key dates on all unitsLP rotor resonance problemsToo many unit trips and forced outagesPoor workmanship in certain areasWet coal, fines and poor qualityPoor Unit availability and reliability
Lowlights
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Lack of Quality ControlGood quality structures and processes are in place. However, the processes are not being followed due to:
• QC staff lack certain skills on Plant• Lack of supervision• Bad planning • Discipline issues• Poor housekeeping
Lessons Learnt
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Lack of Quality ControlToo many plans:
• Contractor• Project Management Plans• High Level Plans
Quality should not be sacrificed due to time constraintsBe very careful when selecting contractors -reference checks
Lessons Cont.
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Project PlansCreate one realistic fully integrated planCommercial process to be geared for project planProject Plan should be centered around P&ID and Single Line DiagramsProject Plan must be inter-phased between different disciplinesPlan needs to be accepted by Project
Lessons Cont.
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Project PlansManagers, Commissioning and PlannersMechanical should be leading discipline per system and co-ordinate all inter-phasingInter-phasing meetings should take place between the different Project Managers and Commercial DepartmentRisk assessments to be done for changes in scope of work
Lessons Cont.
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Procurement ProcessNot quick enough for project environmentProject plan to be aligned to commercial processPoor quality of reports due to a lack of trained buyers and bad planningAppoint experienced and skilled buyers A.S.A.P to overcome shortage
Lessons Cont.
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Scope of WorkScope of work to be determined ASAP for contractingContractors should come to the party right from the start to assist in drawing up scopesPoor scopes of work due to costsChange in SOW to be officially documented
Lessons Cont.
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Lessons Cont.
TeamworkCED and Generation to have common objectivesShared performance appraisals (CED)-Reliability issueCelebrate milestones togetherMixed workgroups CED & CamdenMulti-disciplinary groups
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Lessons Cont.
InterfacingProject managers to ensure proper co-ordination between departments, disciplines and contractorsLack of co-ordination between project planning, contract planning and commissioning planning
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Lessons Cont.
LEADERSHIP (PROBLEMS)Encourage interdepartmental teamworkLeadership to capitalize on opportunities to develop staffEnforce basic disciplineLate for meetingsNo commitmentNon compliance to proceduresDevelop strategies to prevent high staff turnover
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Lessons Cont.
Lack of Philosophies, Operating Procedures, Maintenance & Technical StandardsProduction and technical services to be involved in developing philosophies, operating procedures, maintenance & technical standardsPoor interpretation of above due to a lack of training/experienced operatorsOperating and maintenance manuals to be available before Commercial operation of unit
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Lessons Cont.
SAFETYEnforce discipline amongst contractors to ensure good housekeepingDeal harshly with non conformanceMake provision for adequate lighting when boards are worked onImprove quality of safety inductionEnsure adequate persons are authorized in terms of Plant Safety RegulationsAuthorizations in terms of RP and AP to be part of performance contracts
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Lessons Cont.
CommunicationEncourage one to one communication –not E -mailsJoint communication to respective organizations ( CED & GEN)User Requirement SpecificationURS to be interpreted and used in the spirit that both divisions are part of Eskom HoldingsBoth parties to make an effort to understand the URSUse URS as a minimum guide
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Lessons Cont.
Configuration management vs. document managementPreservation of documents during the next mothballingLack of documents ( history) during the start –up of projectsInclusion of design Review process in design phaseGrid code compliance process and interface with key playersEngineering change management
18 – 22 May 2009, CTICC, Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Lessons Cont.
Scope creep, cost creep and engineering costs Quality control early in the projectCommunication ( Interface) with all stakeholders – interdepartmental and external partiesEverybody should be involved in the scope freezeMods close out processElectro – mechanical interface