Smith - NCLB 2011

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/smith-nclb-2011 1/21

Questions regarding Part I of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at (512) 463-9704 or [email protected].

Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).

Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.

* Asian, Pacific Islander and Two or More Races are not available for indicators that use the former race/ethnicity definitions. Seethe Texas NCLB Glossary for details.

Portions of the NCLB Report Card (Part I, Part II, etc. or prior year information) may not appear when data are not reported.

Texas 2011 NCLB Report Card Part I - Campus Level: Student Performance for Each District and Campus Compared to the State, Percent o Students Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2009-10, 2010-11*

January 31, 20

For SMITH H S (057903002) CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD







January 31, 20


Grade 10 English Language Arts

Campus % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

District % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(InCampus)

Percent of Students in Campus atEach Achievement Level

%Not

MeetingStandard(Basic)

%Met

Standard(Proficient)

%Commend(Advanced

Student Group Year

All Students 2009-10 85 91 90 >99% 15 72 14

2010-11 90 91 90 98 10 81 9

American Indian/AlaskanNative

2009-10* * 91 * * * *

2010-11 * 91 90 * * * *

Asian 2009-10 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 79 92 93 97 21 72 7

Native Hawaiian/PacificIslander

2009-10n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 * * 89 * * * *

African American 2009-10 81 90 86 >99% 19 71 10

2010-11 93 94 87 >99% 7 86 8

Hispanic 2009-10 81 88 87 >99% 19 72 9

2010-11 86 87 87 97 14 79 7

White 2009-10 94 95 94 >99% 6 72 21

2010-11 97 95 94 >99% 3 84 13

(Continued)

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20


Grade 10 English Language Arts


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(InCampus)


%Not


%Met


%Commend(Advanced

Student Group Year

Two or More Races 2009-10 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 80 94 93 >99% 20 * *

Female 2009-10 90 94 93 >99% 10 71 19

2010-11 91 94 93 97 9 79 12

Male 2009-10 80 88 86 >99% 20 72 8

2010-11 89 88 87 99 11 83 6

Special Education 2009-10 66 75 67 >99% 34 56 10

2010-11 73 76 66 >99% 27 65 8

Limited English Proficient 2009-10 44 52 50 >99% 56 * *

2010-11 52 42 53 79 48 48 3

Economically Disadvantaged 2009-10 78 87 85 >99% 22 69 9

2010-11 86 88 86 97 14 80 6

Migrant 2009-10 * * 81 * * * *

2010-11 * * 80 * * * *

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20








January 31, 20


Grade 10 Mathematics


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(InCampus)


%Not


%Met


%Commend(Advanced

Student Group Year

All Students 2009-10 76 77 74 >99% 24 60 162010-11 79 78 74 98 21 68 11


2009-10* * 74 * * * *

2010-11 * 91 73 * * * *


2010-11 86 89 90 97 14 69 17



2010-11 * * 73 * * * *

African American 2009-10 65 62 61 >99% 35 60 5

2010-11 63 66 61 >99% 37 54 9

Hispanic 2009-10 70 73 69 >99% 30 61 9

2010-11 80 76 69 97 20 74 6

White 2009-10 90 86 83 >99% 10 63 27

2010-11 90 87 83 >99% 10 68 22

(Continued)

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20


Grade 10 Mathematics


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(InCampus)


%Not


%Met


%Commend(Advanced

Student Group Year


2010-11 60 81 80 >99% 40 * *

Female 2009-10 79 78 74 >99% 21 62 17

2010-11 74 78 74 97 26 64 11

Male 2009-10 73 76 73 >99% 27 58 16

2010-11 83 79 74 99 17 72 11


2010-11 60 60 52 >99% 40 * *

Limited English Proficient 2009-10 36 47 42 >99% 64 33 2

2010-11 66 51 44 78 34 * *


2010-11 76 76 67 97 24 68 8

Migrant 2009-10 * * 65 * * * *

2010-11 * * 62 * * * *

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20








January 31, 20


Grade 10 Science


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(InCampus)


%Not


%Met


%Commend(Advanced

Student Group Year

All Students 2009-10 78 80 73 99 22 58 212010-11 82 80 75 98 18 58 24


2009-10* * 77 * * * *

2010-11 * * 78 * * * *


2010-11 76 87 89 97 24 48 28



2010-11 * * 73 * * * *

African American 2009-10 70 73 61 99 30 61 9

2010-11 73 72 62 >99% 27 58 15

Hispanic 2009-10 70 73 65 99 30 60 10

2010-11 82 76 68 96 18 65 17

White 2009-10 94 93 86 98 6 54 39

2010-11 95 90 87 99 5 49 46

(Continued)

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20


Grade 10 Science


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)


MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

State % of Students

MetStandard

(Proficient)and

Commended(Advanced)

%Tested

(InCampus)


%Not


%Met


%Commend(Advanced

Student Group Year


2010-11 60 81 85 >99% 40 * *

Female 2009-10 81 80 71 98 19 62 19

2010-11 78 78 73 96 22 57 21

Male 2009-10 76 80 75 >99% 24 53 23

2010-11 86 83 76 99 14 60 26


2010-11 67 60 46 >99% 33 56 10

Limited English Proficient 2009-10 29 35 29 98 71 * *

2010-11 48 37 31 78 52 * *


2010-11 80 76 65 97 20 64 15

Migrant 2009-10 * * 55 * * * *

2010-11 * * 53 * * * *

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011


Questions regarding Part II a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us a(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].


Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent. Additional Academic Indicators (Graduation and Attendanc Rate) are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).



Texas 2011 NCLB Report Card Part II a. - Campus Level: Comparison Between Student Achievement and the State Academic Expectationsas Measured by Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)*

January 31, 20








January 31, 20


Reading/Language Arts

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:73%

'11 Target:

80%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:73%

'11 Target:

80%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient&

Commende(Advanced

'10 Target73%

'11 Target

80%

Campus District State Campus District State

Student Group Year

All Students 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 85 90 88

2010-11 98 99 >99% 88 90 88


2009-10* 98 99 * 92 91

2010-11 * >99% 99 * 87 88

Asian 2009-10 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 97 99 99 78 95 94


2009-10n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 * >99% 99 * >99% 89

African American 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 81 89 84

2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 92 88 83

(Continued)

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20



Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:73%

'11 Target:

80%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:73%

'11 Target:

80%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient&

Commende(Advanced

'10 Target73%

'11 Target

80%


Student Group Year

Hispanic 2009-10 >99% 99 99 80 87 85

2010-11 97 99 99 85 88 85

White 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 94 96 94

2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 97 96 94

Two or More Races 2009-10 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 >99% >99% >99% * 92 92

Female 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 90 92 90

2010-11 97 99 >99% 90 92 90

Male 2009-10 >99% >99% 99 80 88 86

2010-11 99 99 >99% 87 89 86

(Continued)

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20



Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:73%

'11 Target:

80%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:73%

'11 Target:

80%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient&

Commende(Advanced

'10 Target73%

'11 Target

80%


Student Group Year

Special Education 2009-10 >99% >99% 99 66 76 66

2010-11 >99% >99% 99 63 74 67

Limited English Proficient 2009-10 >99% 99 99 54 82 77

2010-11 79 98 99 51 83 78

Economically Disadvantaged 2009-10 >99% 99 99 77 87 83

2010-11 97 99 99 84 87 83

Migrant 2009-10 * * 98 * * 75

2010-11 * * 98 * * 76

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20








January 31, 20


Mathematics

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:67%

'11 Target:

75%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:67%

'11 Target:

75%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient&

Commende(Advanced

'10 Target67%

'11 Target

75%


Student Group Year

All Students 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 76 87 84

2010-11 98 >99% >99% 79 88 84


2009-10* >99% 99 * 87 85

2010-11 * >99% >99% * 81 84


2010-11 97 >99% >99% 85 96 95


2009-10n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 * >99% >99% * >99% 86

African American 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 65 80 75

2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 65 81 75

(Continued)

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20


Mathematics

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:67%

'11 Target:

75%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:67%

'11 Target:

75%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient&

Commende(Advanced

'10 Target67%

'11 Target

75%


Student Group Year

Hispanic 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 69 85 81

2010-11 97 >99% >99% 78 86 82

White 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 92 94 91

2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 88 93 91


2010-11 >99% >99% >99% * 94 89

Female 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 79 88 84

2010-11 97 >99% >99% 74 88 85

Male 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 74 87 83

2010-11 99 >99% >99% 83 87 84

(Continued)

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20


Mathematics

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

Percent

Tested

Target:

95%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:67%

'11 Target:

75%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient)&

Commended(Advanced)

'10 Target:67%

'11 Target:

75%

PercentMetStandard

(Proficient&

Commende(Advanced

'10 Target67%

'11 Target

75%


Student Group Year

Special Education 2009-10 >99% >99% 99 46 76 61

2010-11 >99% >99% >99% 44 77 63

Limited English Proficient 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 39 84 78

2010-11 78 99 >99% 56 85 79

Economically Disadvantaged 2009-10 >99% >99% >99% 67 84 79

2010-11 97 >99% >99% 75 85 79

Migrant 2009-10 * * 99 * * 74

2010-11 * * >99% * * 75

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20








January 31, 20


Additional Academic Indicators

Four-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:75%

'11 Target:75%

Four-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:75%

'11 Target:75%

Four-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:75%

'11 Target:75%

Five-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:80%

'11 Target:80%

Five-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:80%

'11 Target:80%

Five-year

GraduatioRate

'10 Target80%

'11 Target80%


Student Group Year

All Students 2009-10 93.4 84.5 80.6 95.2 87.8 83.4

2010-11 94.9 87.3 84.3 96.2 89.1 85.1

AmericanIndian/Alaskan Native

2009-10- * 80.3 * 100.0 86.6

2010-11 * 88.9 84.2 - * 83.8


2010-11 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

NativeHawaiian/PacificIslander

2009-10

n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

African American 2009-10 83.6 82.9 73.8 89.5 88.0 76.5

2010-11 95.9 87.5 78.8 89.2 89.6 78.8

Hispanic 2009-10 93.1 77.1 73.5 94.0 77.6 77.0

2010-11 91.6 81.5 78.8 96.2 83.5 80.0

(Continued)

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20



Four-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:75%

'11 Target:75%

Four-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:75%

'11 Target:75%

Four-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:75%

'11 Target:75%

Five-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:80%

'11 Target:80%

Five-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:80%

'11 Target:80%

Five-year

GraduatioRate

'10 Target80%

'11 Target80%


Student Group Year

White 2009-10 96.6 90.6 89.7 98.7 94.5 91.1

2010-11 97.5 92.9 91.6 98.3 93.0 92.1


2010-11 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Female 2009-10 95.9 86.5 82.9 96.0 89.8 85.0

2010-11 96.0 90.1 86.5 98.6 90.4 86.8

Male 2009-10 90.9 82.5 78.3 94.2 85.6 81.8

2010-11 93.9 84.5 82.1 93.7 87.7 83.5

Special Education 2009-10 80.6 70.1 71.8 79.3 77.2 77.3

2010-11 72.7 70.5 74.4 86.7 73.9 78.1

Limited EnglishProficient

2009-1081.0 59.4 56.9 88.9 66.5 63.8

2010-11 75.0 64.4 62.8 95.1 69.9 67.5

(Continued)

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20



Four-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:75%

'11 Target:75%

Four-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:75%

'11 Target:75%

Four-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:75%

'11 Target:75%

Five-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:80%

'11 Target:80%

Five-year

GraduationRate

'10 Target:80%

'11 Target:80%

Five-year

GraduatioRate

'10 Target80%

'11 Target80%


Student Group Year

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2009-1089.1 83.8 78.3 90.1 82.1 76.6

2010-11 94.1 87.4 81.9 91.4 89.5 83.7

Migrant 2009-10 - - 69.3 - - 72.3

2010-11 - - 75.7 - - 76.4

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20








January 31, 20



Attendance

Rate

Target:90%

Attendance

Rate

Target:90%

Attendance

Rate

Target:90%

Campus District State

Student Group Year

All Students 2009-10 n/a n/a 95.6

2010-11 n/a n/a 95.5

American Indian/Alaskan Native 2009-10 n/a n/a 95.0

2010-11 n/a n/a 95.0

Asian 2009-10 n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 n/a n/a 97.5

Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2009-10 n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 n/a n/a 95.5

African American 2009-10 n/a n/a 95.2

2010-11 n/a n/a 95.1

Hispanic 2009-10 n/a n/a 95.5

2010-11 n/a n/a 95.3

White 2009-10 n/a n/a 95.7

2010-11 n/a n/a 95.6

Two or More Races 2009-10 n/a n/a n/a

2010-11 n/a n/a 95.7

(Continued)

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011








January 31, 20



Attendance

Rate

Target:90%

Attendance

Rate

Target:90%

Attendance

Rate

Target:90%

Campus District State

Student Group Year

Female 2009-10 n/a n/a 95.6

2010-11 n/a n/a 95.5

Male 2009-10 n/a n/a 95.6

2010-11 n/a n/a 95.5

Special Education 2009-10 n/a n/a 94.1

2010-11 n/a n/a 94.0

Limited English Proficient 2009-10 n/a n/a 96.5

2010-11 n/a n/a 96.3

Economically Disadvantaged 2009-10 n/a n/a 95.3

2010-11 n/a n/a 95.2

Migrant 2009-10 n/a n/a 94.1

2010-11 n/a n/a 93.9

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011


Questions regarding Part III of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].

'n/a' indicates the district or school does not receive Title I, Part A funds.


Texas 2011 NCLB Report Card Part III - Campus Level: Information on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and School Improvement Program(SIP) for Districts and Campuses Receiving Title I, Part A funds

January 31, 20


Questions regarding Part III of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting. Contact us at(512) 463-9704 or [email protected].

'n/a' indicates the district or school does not receive Title I, Part A funds.


Texas 2011 NCLB Report Card Part III - Campus Level: Information on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and School Improvement Program(SIP) for Districts and Campuses Receiving Title I, Part A funds

January 31, 20


Met AYP

SIP(for the

subsequent

schoolyear)

Year

2009-10 Meets AYP NONE

2010-11 Missed AYP NONE

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011


Questions regarding Part IV a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Initatives. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].

A dash (-) indicates data are not reported; 'n/a' indicates that the data are not available or applicable.

Percentages reported by Teacher Degree may not sum to 100% either due to rounding or because the category 'teachers with nodegree' is not reported.

Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).


Texas 2011 NCLB Report Card Part IV a. - Campus Level: Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers, As Defined by the State (Teacher Degree)

January 31, 20


Questions regarding Part IV a. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Initatives. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].


Percentages reported by Teacher Degree may not sum to 100% either due to rounding or because the category 'teachers with nodegree' is not reported.

Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a percent (one decimal place).


Texas 2011 NCLB Report Card Part IV a. - Campus Level: Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers, As Defined by the State (Teacher Degree)

January 31, 20


Bachelors Masters Doctorate

Year

2009-10 64.5 32.9 2.2

2010-11 68.0 29.7 2.3

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011


Questions regarding Part IV b. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Initatives. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].


Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2011 NCLB Report Card Part IV b. - Campus Level: Percent of Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers With Emergency/Provisional Credentials

January 31, 20


Questions regarding Part IV b. of the NCLB Report Card should be directed to the Division of Educator Initatives. Contact us at (512) 936-9831 or [email protected].


Percent of Teachers are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2011 NCLB Report Card Part IV b. - Campus Level: Percent of Public Elementary and Secondary Teachers With Emergency/Provisional Credentials

January 31, 20


%

Year

2009-10 0.00

2010-11 0.00

8/3/2019 Smith - NCLB 2011



Percent of Classes are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2011 NCLB Report Card Part IV c. - Campus Level: Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

January 31, 20



Percent of Classes are rounded to the nearest one-hundredth of a percent (two decimal places).


Texas 2011 NCLB Report Card Part IV c. - Campus Level: Percent of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

January 31, 20


%

Year

2009-10 0.00

2010-11 0.00

Documents

Smith - NCLB 2011