Upload
alamea
View
29
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
So many terms. Assessment : . Testing : . Diagnosis : . McLoughlin & Lewis, 2005. Special education assessment is not. Based on the medical model Is no longer focused solely on the student. Special education assessment is. Ongoing Individualized Systematic Comprehensive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
So many terms . . .
Assessment: .
Testing: .
Diagnosis: .
McLoughlin & Lewis, 2005
Special education assessment is not . . .
• Based on the medical model
• Is no longer focused solely on the student
Special education assessment is . . .
• Ongoing• Individualized• Systematic• Comprehensive • Purposeful• Linked to general education curriculum• Varied• Team-based• Non-biased (strives to be!)
McLoughlin & Lewis, 2005
Three major outcomes of assessment occur before, during, and after instruction.
• Screening and Identification
• Diagnostics/Planning and Formative Evaluation
• Documenting Outcomes, Securing Funds, and Providing Accountability
Traditional Assessment Model
Contemporary Assessment Model
vs.
McLoughlin, J. & Lewis, R. (2005).
Difficulties With Traditional Assessment Practices
• Lack of Pre-referral Interventions• Lack of Integrity of Pre-referral Interventions• Wait to fail model• Bias in Referral Process• Bias in Assessment Process• Lack of Consistency in Eligibility Decisions
Formal vs. Informal Assessments
FormalStandardized Assessment Tests given with specific instructions and
procedures A standard (norms or performance criteria)
established so scores can be interpreted with that standard as the comparison or referent
Informal: Non-standardized methods of evaluating progress,
such as interviews, observations, teacher-made tests
Formative vs. Summative Assessment
Types of Assessment MEthods
Norm-referenced Assessment
• Tests designed to compare a specific student’s ability with the ability of same age students in national sample.
• Examples:– WRAT– PIAT– KTEA– WJ
Strengths & Weakness?
STRENGTHS
Good for determining relative standing in peer group
Standardized to make comparisons
WEAKNESSES
Content may not overlap curriculum
Can’t use frequently to PM
Not intended for instructional planning
Criterion-Referenced Tests
• Compare a student’s performance against an absolute standard that reflects acquisition of the skill
• Criterion-related Tests– .
Comparison of NRT and CRT
Norm Referenced tests• Compare to a norm• Can inform comparison to
norm group and eligibility• Has a range of skills• .
• Often group administered and/or machine scored and so use response formats
Criterion referenced tests• Compare to a criterion• .• Targets specific skills• Collects an adequate
sample of student’s performance on a skill
• Uses similar items to those found during instruction
Informal Assessments
• Dynamic Assessment– Interactive assessment to determine if student has
potential to learn a new skill.
• Portfolio Assessment– .
Informal Assessments
Error Analysis– .
Checklists, Rating Scales, Observations- A variety of measures used to determine student's
skill level or behavioral functioning.Ecological Assessment
Direct Assessment of Academic Skills
• Curriculum-Based Assessment– .
• Curriculum-Based Measurement-