Upload
arty
View
52
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Social Psychology What is social p sychology’s f ocus? Social thinking Social influence Social relations. What Is Social Psychology’s Focus?. Social psychologists U se scientific methods to study how we think about, influence, and relate to one another - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Geri Lavrov / Photographer's Choice / Getty Images
Social PsychologyWhat is social psychology’s focus?
Social thinking
Social influence
Social relations
What Is SocialPsychology’s Focus?
Social psychologistsUse scientific methods to study how we think about, influence, and relate to one another
Study social forces that explain why people act differently in different situations
Personality psychologistsStudy personal traits and processes that explain why individuals may act differently in a given situation
Social Thinking
The fundamental attribution error
Attitudes and actions
Social Thinking
Fundamental attribution errorThe tendency, when analyzing others’ behavior, to overestimate the influence of personal traits and underestimate the effects of the situation
Most likely to occur when a stranger acts badly
Has real-life and social consequences
Napolitan and colleagues (1979)Students attributed behavior of others to personal traits, even when they were told that behavior was part of an experimental situation
Social Thinking
Attitude most influences behavior when:External influences are minimal
The attitude is stable
The attitude is specific to the behavior
The attitude is easily recalled
Social Thinking
Attitudes follow behavior
Foot-in-the-door phenomenon
People agreeing to a small request will find it easier to later agree to a larger one
Principle works for negative and positive behavior
ATTITUDES FOLLOW BEHAVIORCooperative actions, such as those performed by people on sports teams feed mutual liking. Such attitudes, in turn, promote positive behavior.
REU
TERS
/ Vas
ily F
edos
enko
Social Thinking
Cognitive dissonance: Relief from tensionWe act to reduce the discomfort (dissonance) we feel when two of our thoughts (cognitions) clash
Brain regions become active when people experience cognitive dissonance
Through cognitive dissonance we often bring attitudes into line with our actions (Festinger)
Driving to school one snowy day, Marco narrowly misses a car that slides through a red light. “Slow down! What a terrible driver,” he thinks to himself. Moments later, Marco himself slips through an intersection and yelps, “Wow! These roads are awful. The city plows need to get out here.” What social psychology principle has Marco just demonstrated? Explain.
How do our attitudes and our actions affect each other?
When people act in a way that is not in keeping with their attitudes, and then change their attitudes to match those actions, theory attempts to explain why?
Social Influence
Conformity and obedience
Group influence
THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT: The internet as social amplifier
Social Influence
Conformity and obedienceChartrand and colleagues (1999)
Demonstrated chameleon effect with college students
Automatic mimicry helps people to empathize and feel what others feel
The more we mimic, the greater our empathy, and the more people tend to like us
Social Influence
Group pressure and conformity research findings
People are more likely to conform when they:
Are made to feel incompetent or insecureAre in a group in which everyone else agreesAdmire the group’s status and attractivenessHave not already committed to any responseKnow that others in the group will observe our behaviorAre from a culture that strongly encourages respect for social standards
Which of the three comparison lines on the right is equal to the standard line? The photo on the left (from one of the experiments) was taken after five people, who were actually working for Asch, had answered, “Line 3.” The student in the center shows the severe discomfort that comes from disagreeing with the responses of other group members.
ASCH’S CONFORMITY EXPERIMENTSWilliam Vendivert/Scientific American
Which of the following strengthens conformity to a group?
a. Finding the group attractive
b. Feeling secure
c. Coming from an individualist culture
d. Having already decided on a response
Social Influence
ObedienceMilgram investigated the effects of punishment on learning
Experiments involved commands to shock someone using up to a 450-volt final level
More than 60 percent followed orders
STANLEY MILGRAM (1933–1984) This social psychologist’s obedience experiments “belongto the self-understanding of literate people in our age” (Sabini, 1986).
MILGRAM’S FOLLOW UP OBEDIENCE EXPERIMENTIn a repeat of the earlier experiment, 65 percent of the adult male “teachers” fully obeyed the experimenter’s commands to continue. They did so despite the “learner’s” earlier mention of a heart condition and despite hearing cries of protest after they delivered what they thought were 150 volts, and agonized protests after 330 volts. (Data from Milgram, 1974.)
Social Influence: Obedience
Milgram’s later research: Obedience was highest when
The person giving orders was in close proximity and perceived as a legitimate authority figure
The authority figure was supported by a well-known institution
The victim was depersonalized or at a distance
No models existed for defiance
Lessons From the Conformity and Obedience Studies
Strong social influences can make people conform to falsehoods or give in to cruelty
Social control and personal control interact
Minority influence is most effective if a position is taken firmly
In psychology’s most famous obedience experiments, most participants obeyed an authority figure’s demands to inflict presumed life-threatening shocks on an innocent person. Which social psychologist conducted these experiments?
In the obedience experiments, people were most likely to follow orders in four situations. What were those situations?
Social Influence
Social facilitationResponses on individual tasks are stronger in the presence of others (Triplett)
The presence of others sometimes helps and sometimes hurts (Guerin and others)
GANDHI As the life of Hindu nationalistand spiritual leader Mahatma Gandhi(right) powerfully testified, a consistent and persistent minority voice can sometimes sway the majority. His nonviolent appeals and fasts helped India win its independence from Britain in 1947.
akg-
imag
es /N
ewsc
om
Social InfluenceHome team advantage• When others observe
us, we perform well-learned tasks more quickly and accurately.
• But on new and difficult tasks, performance is less quick and accurate.
Spe
ncer
Gra
nt/ a
ge fo
tost
ock
Social Influence
WORKING HARD, OR HARDLY WORKING?In group projects, such as this Earth Day beach cleanup, social loafing often occurs, as individuals free ride on the efforts of others.
Social loafing • The tendency for people in a
group to exert less effort when pooling their efforts toward attaining a common goal than when individually accountable
Causes• Acting as part of a group and
feeling less accountable• Feeling that individual contribution
does not matter• Taking advantage when there is
lack of identification with a group
Law
renc
e M
igda
le/ P
hoto
Res
earc
hers
, Inc
.
Social Influence
DeindividuationA loss of self-awareness and self-restraint occurring in group situations that foster arousal and anonymity
Thrives in many different settings
During England’s 2011 riots and looting, rioters were disinhibited by social arousal and by the anonymity provided by darkness and their hoods and masks. Later, some of those arrested expressed bewilderment over their own behavior.
DEINDIVIDUATION
Lew
is W
hyld
/ PA
Wire
URN
:113
4992
2 (P
ress
Ass
ocia
tion
via
AP Im
ages
)
GROUP POLARIZATION
• If a group is like-minded, discussion strengthens existing opinions
• Talking about racial issues increased prejudice in a high-prejudice group of high school students and decreased it in a low-prejudice group (Myers & Bishop, 1970)
• How did researchers capture group polarization in the 2005 “Deliberation Day” experiment? (See page 348)
The internet as social amplifierNegative
Can isolate people from those with different opinions
May create support for shared ideas and suspicions
Can foster abusive or violent behavior
PositiveCan connect friends and family members
Helps in coping with challenges
Fosters social ventures
Hero
Imag
es/C
orbi
s
Social Influence
GroupthinkMode of thinking that occurs when the desire for harmony in a decision-making group overrides a realistic appraisal of alternatives
ExamplesEscalation of Vietnam war
Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident
U.S. space shuttle Challenger explosion
WMD in Iraq
What is social facilitation, and under what circumstances is it most likely to occur?
People tend to exert less effort when working with a group than they would alone, which is called ________.
When a group’s desire for harmony overrides its realistic analysis of other options, ________ has occurred.
You are organizing a meeting of fiercely competitive political candidates. To add to the fun, friends have suggested handing out masks of the candidates’ faces for supporters to wear. What effect might these masks trigger?
Social Relations
Prejudice
CLOSE-UP: Automatic prejudice
Aggression
Attraction
CLOSE-UP: Online matchmaking and speed dating
Altruism
Conflict and peacemaking
Social Relations
Prejudice• Means “prejudgment”• Is an unfair negative attitude
toward some group• Often targets different cultural,
ethnic, or gender groups
Components• Beliefs• Emotions• Predispositions to action (to
discriminate)
How Prejudiced Are People?
Open prejudice lessens; subtle prejudice lingers
Prejudice can also be automatic and unconscious
Worldwide, gender prejudice and discrimination exist
Gays and lesbians cannot comfortably be themselves
Fathers are perceived as more intelligent than mothers
More women live in poverty; 163 million “missing women”
Prejudice Over Time
Americans’ approval of interracial dating has soared over he past half-century. (Gallup surveys reported by Carroll, 2007.)
Social Relations
Social roots of prejudiceSocial inequalities: Have often developed attitudes that justify the status quo
Just-world phenomenon: Good is rewarded and evil is punished
Stereotypes: Rationalize inequalities
GroupsThrough social identities people associate themselves with others
Evolution prepares people to identify with a group
Automatic prejudiceImplicit racial associations: Negative associations linked to the denial of racial prejudice
Race-influenced perceptions: Perceptions influenced by expectations
Reflexive bodily responses: Telltale signs of selective body responses to another person’s race
THE INGROUPScotland’s famed “Tartan Army” soccer fans, shown here during a match againstarchrival England, share a social identity that defines “us” (the Scottish ingroup) and “them” (the English outgroup).
• Ingroup: Social definition of who we are—and are not• Ingroup bias: A favoring of our own group
Mik
e He
witt
/ Gett
y Im
ages
Emotional Roots of Prejudice
Scapegoat theoryProposes that when things go wrong, finding someone to blame can provide an outlet for anger
Research evidence (Zimbardo)Prejudice levels tend to be high among economically frustrated people
In experiments, a temporary frustration increases prejudice
Cognitive Roots of Prejudice
Forming categoriesHumans categorize people by race: mixed-race people identified by minority identity
Similarities are overestimated during categorization; creating “Us and They”
Overestimation also occurs; other-race effect or bias
CATEGORIZING MIXED-RACE PEOPLE
When New Zealanders quickly classified 104 photos by race, those of European descent more often than those of Chinese descent classified the ambiguous middle two as Chinese (Halberstadt et al., 2011).
Dr. Jamin Halberstadt
Cognitive Roots of Prejudice
Remembering vivid cases
The 9/11 Muslim terroristscreated, in many minds, an exaggerated stereotype of Muslims as terrorism prone.
People often judge the likelihood of events by recalling vivid cases that readily come to mind.
When a prejudiced attitude causes us to blame an innocent person for our problems, we have used that person as a ________.
Biology of Aggression
Biology influences aggression at three levelsGenetic influences
Evidence from animal studies and twin studies; Y chromosome genetic marker
Biochemical influencesTestosterone is linked with irritability, assertiveness, impulsiveness, and a low tolerance for frustration
Alcohol is associated with aggressive responses to frustration
Neural influencesNeural systems facilitate or inhibit aggression when provoked
Aggression is more likely to occur with frontal lobe damage
Psychological and Social-Cultural Influences onAggression
Reinforcement, modeling, and self-controlModeling and rewarding sensitivity and cooperation at an early age fosters more positive behavior
Self-control curbs aggression; poor self-control is correlated with crime
Psychological and Social-Cultural Influences onAggression
Adversive eventsFrustration-aggression principle: Frustration creates anger, which can spark aggression
Other aversive stimuli: Hot temperatures, physical pain, personal insults, foul odors, cigarette smoke, crowding, and a host of others
TEMPERATURE AND RETALIATION
Psychological and Social-Cultural Influences onAggression
Media models for violenceRepeatedly viewing on-screen violence tends to lessen sensitivity to cruelty and teaches social scripts
Social scripts provide cultural mental files for how to act
Research confirms that people sometimes imitate what they have viewed
Viewing explicit sexual violence is linked to men’s aggression against women
Psychological and Social-Cultural Influences onAggression
Do violent video games teach social scripts for violence?
Nearly 400 studies of 130,000 people suggest video games can prime aggressive thoughts, decrease empathy, and increase aggression
Some researchers dispute this finding and note other factors: Depression, family violence, and peer influence
COINCIDENCE OR CAUSE? In 2011, Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik bombed government buildings in Oslo, and then went to a youth camp, where he shot andkilled 69 people, mostly teens.
How is this related to effects of media violence?
REU
TERS
/ And
rew
Ber
wic
k vi
a w
ww
.frea
k.no
/Han
dout
What psychological, biological, and socialcultural influences interact to produce aggressive behaviors?
WHAT DO WE MEAN BY “ATTRACTIVE”?
The answer varies by culture and over time. Yet some adult physical features, such as a youthful form and face,
seem attractive everywhere.
Mirj
am L
etsc
h / A
lam
y
Dani
ta D
elim
ont /
Ala
my
Ingr
am P
ublis
hing
/ Ju
pite
r Im
ages
Attraction
Psychology of attractionProximity
Physical attractiveness
Similarity
Online Matchmaking•1500 on-line dating services; 30 million users; estimated one-fifth of U.S. marriages today•Internet-formed friendships and romantic relationships last, on average, 2 years longer than face-to-face relationships•Controlled studies are needed
Speed Dating
•Unique opportunity to study first impressions•Findings;•Men are more transparent•Given more options, people make more superficial choices•Men wish for more contact with more of their speed dates; women are more selective
People tend to marry someone who lives or works nearby. This is an example of proximity and the
________ in action.
How does being physically attractive influence others’ perceptions?
Romantic Love
Passionate loveTwo-factor theory of emotion
Emotions have two ingredients—physical arousal and cognitive appraisal
Arousal from any source can enhance an emotion, depending on how we interpret and label the arousal
Sexual desire + a growing attachment = the passion of romantic love
LOVE IS AN ANCIENT THING- In 2007, skeletons of a 5000- to 6000-year-old “Romeo and Juliet” young couple were unearthed, locked in an embrace, near Rome.
AP P
hoto
/Arc
haeo
logi
cal S
ocie
ty S
AP, h
o
Romantic Love
Companionate lovePassionate love seldom endures
Passion feeding hormones (testosterone) give way to oxytocin that supports feelings of trust, calmness, and bonding
Attraction and sexual desire endure, without the obsession of early-stage marriage
Equity is an important key to a satisfying and enduring relationship
Self-disclosure deepens intimacy
How does the two-factor theory of emotion help explain passionate love?
Two vital components for maintaining companionate love are ________ and ________.
Altruism
AltruismUnselfish concern for the welfare of others
Bystander intervention (Darley and Latané)Necessary conditions
Notice incident
Interpret event as emergency
Assume responsibility for helping
Bystander Intervention
Bystander Effect
When people thought they alone heard the calls for help from a person they believed to be having an epileptic seizure, they usually helped
But when they thought four others were also present a third responded. (From Darley & Latané, 1968a.)
RESPONSES TO A STAGED PHYSICAL EMERGENCY
Bystander Effect
What contributes to the odds that a person will help someone?
The Norms for Helping
Positive social norms encourage generosity and enable group living.
Socialization normSocial expectation that prescribes how we should behave
Reciprocity normExpectation that people will respond favorably to each other by returning benefits for benefits
Social-responsibility normExpectation that people should help those who depend on them
ConflictPerceived incompatibility of actions, goals, or ideas
Mirror-image perceptionsMutual views often held by conflicting people, as when each side sees itself as ethical and peaceful and views the other side as evil and aggressive
Conflict and Peacemaking
Enemy perceptionsPeople in conflict form negative, distorted images of one another (mirror-image perceptions)
“Us” versus “Them” develops
A vicious cycle of hostility emerges at individual or national level
Perceptions can become self-fulfilling prophecies
Promoting Peace
Research indicates that in some cases contact and cooperation can be transformational
ContactMost effective when contact is free of competition and equal status exists
Across a quarter-million people studied in 38 nations, friendly contact with ethnic minorities, older people, and people with disabilities has usually led to less prejudice
Contact is not always enough
Promoting Peace
CooperationSherif used shared predicaments and superordinate goals to turn enemies into friends
Cooperative contact, not conflict alone, reduced conflict
Experiments with teens in 11 countries confirm that cooperative learning can maintain or enhance student achievement
This could be applied to activities focused on making friends of former enemies
Promoting Peace KOFI ANNAN “Most of us have overlapping identitieswhich unite us with very different groups. We can love what we are, without hating what—and who—we are not.
We can thrive in our own tradition, even as welearn from others” (Nobel lecture, 2001).
AP P
hoto
/ Sha
wn
Bald
win
Why do sports fans tend to feel a sense of satisfaction when their archrival team loses? Why do such feelings, in other settings, make conflict resolution more challenging?
What are two ways to reconcile conflicts and promote peace?