Upload
chantelhd
View
4.983
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The completion of this Internal Assessment would not have been possible without the help of the Almighty God, who gave me the strength and health to complete the assignment. Also my family and friends played a major role in assisting me in obtaining the necessary research data for the project. And last but definitely not the least my wonderful sociology teacher Mrs. Candice Pooran, who aided her students’ with well prepared tutorials and guided us every step of the way. I am extremely thankful.
Page | 1
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM/INTRODUCTION
This study is based on the labeling theory which was created and developed by Frank
Tannenbaum and Howard S. Becker; in this research we will look at “the extent to which labels
or stigmas negatively impacts on juvenile behavior in Secondary Schools in Sangre
Grande”. According to Sociology Themes and Perspectives; labeling is a process of social
reaction by the “social audience,” (stereotyping) the people in society, judging and accordingly
defining (labeling) someone’s behavior as deviant or otherwise. Labeling theory, consequently,
suggests that deviance is caused by the deviant’s behaviour being labeled as morally inferior, the
deviants internalizing the label and finally the deviant’s acts in accordance to that specific label.
In other words it can be said that the social audience is responsible for forming positive sanctions
[reward] or negative sanctions [punishment] whereby creating or diminishing deviants in society.
93 words
Page | 2
AIM OF THE INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
As students acquire labels such as ‘delinquents’, and ‘vandals’, and are subsequently rejected by
peers, colleagues, and family, members; they may be under heavy scrutiny or stigmatized and are
often suspended or expelled from schools or forced into the juvenile penal systems resulting in
the individuals becoming worst off than they were with more enthusiasm to commit grave acts of
deviance.
The aim of this Internal Assessment is to determine the following:
1. To get a clear understanding of whether or not labeling divides a society and how so.
2. To come up with solutions in an attempt to eradicate labeling in today’s school
population, and to prove that each individual is more than capable of conforming to
accepted rules so that deviance and criminal activities are reduced in schools.
3. To allow persons to identify other ways to deal with a negative situation, other than
resulting to deviants acts to solve their problems.
4. To observe the factors which explain the circumstances where certain acts are tolerated
and classified as deviant.
172 words
Page | 3
OBJECTIVES OF INTERNAL ASSESSMENTS
In an effort to thoroughly evaluate the statement of problem, “the extent to which labels or
stigmas negatively impacts on juvenile behavior in Secondary Schools in Sangre Grande”. It is
obligatory to ensure that there is a clear detailed plan of action which is to be taken in order to
make certain this study is accurate and consists of pertinent information for the study to be
deemed successful.
The Internal Assessment will be encompassing the following objectives:
1. To determine what motivates students to commit acts of deviance in schools (juveniles).
2. To observe if deviant acts are committed only by persons of a particular, gender, age category, ethnic group, religion and social class etc.
3. The extent to which the family unit can be held responsible for producing deviants as they are
the primary unit of socialization. [Dysfunctional families]
4. To establish, that certain deviant acts are sanctioned as opposed to others.
123 words
Page | 4
LITERATURE REVIEW
In conducting research for this study, information was extracted from numerous articles, books
and internet sources in an effort to select appropriate coherent data that supports the study.
According to the research data, there is a distinctive link between labeling and deviant behaviour.
From a sociological context deviance is described as actions or behavior that violates cultural
norms including formally-enacted rules (e.g., crime) as well as informal violations of socials
norms (e.g., rejecting folkways and mores). It is the purview of sociologists, psychologists,
psychiatrists and criminologist to study how these norms are created, how they change over time
and how they are enforced. 1 To support the aforementioned Howard Becker’s book Outsiders,
which emerged in the 1960’s he states that “Social groups create deviance by making rules
whose infraction constitutes deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and
labeling them as outsiders. From this point of view, deviance is not a quality of the act the person
commits, but rather a consequence of the application of rules and sanctions to the “offender.”
The deviant is one to whom that label has been successfully applied; deviant behavior is
behavior that people so label.” In other words, ‘deviance is in the eye of the beholder, what
would be considered deviance in one instance is not in another.’ Another theorist noted was
Robert K Merton: he discussed deviance in terms of goals and means as part of his strain/anomie
theory. Where Durkheim states that anomie is the confounding of social norms, Merton goes
further and states that anomie is the state in which social goals and the legitimate means to
achieve them do not correspond. He postulated that an individual’s response to societal
expectations and the means by which the individual pursued those goals were useful to
understanding deviance; with that said it can be concluded that deviant behavior is created by the
1 Definition taken from JD Douglas and FC Waksler FC, The Sociology of deviance: an introduction. Boston: Little Brown, 1982
Page | 5
pressures society places on individual to conforms to accepted norms. Albert Cohen’s Sub-
cultural Theory, opposed Merton’s views that the motivation for deviant behavior arises out of
the frustration of failing to achieve success by legitimate means. He notes that deviant/delinquent
acts are not always undertaken as an individual response to frustration but rather as a collective
response. Many delinquent/deviant acts are not always undertaken for financial gain but are non-
utilitarian and malicious. He sees the cause of much delinquency as status frustration. Success is
replaced with an alternative to gain prestige in the eyes of their peers. These are the values of the
lower working class, delinquent subculture n which such boys are socialized. “Lower class boy,
middle class measuring rod.”
322 words
Page | 6
RESEARCH DESIGN
Research is defined as the systematic study of materials and sources in order to establish facts
and reach new conclusions2. The use of primary and secondary data was incorporated in this
study; this entailed the use of questionnaires, books sociology websites and articles. In order to
collect information, a data collection instrument and strategies had to be employed; a qualitative
approach was utilized as a large sample was not required. In investigating, “the extent to which
labels or stigmas negatively impacts on juvenile behavior in Secondary Schools in Sangre
Grande”.
Some of the advantages and disadvantages of using a questionnaire are as follows:
Advantages:
1. It is confidential
2. A great volume of information can be obtained from it
3. Its structure allows it to be easily analyzed
4. Not costly to produce
Disadvantages:
1. Time consuming,
2. Can be misinterpreted by respondents and they may produce fictitious answers,
A total of 40 forty questionnaires were distributed to random persons from each of the secondary schools in Sangre Grande. This was done so that the respondent’s responses would vary as they all are encapsulated in different environments with similar yet varied norms and expectations. 164 words
2 Definition taken from Oxford Pocket English Dictionary, Tenth Edition
Page | 7
SAMPLE
A sample can be defined as a small part or quantity intended to show what the whole is like. A
sampling frame was utilized to study the desired portion of the population; a sampling frame is a
means of defining the population of interest. Stratified random sample was incorporated, a total
of forty questionnaires distributed in the five Secondary Schools in Sangre Grande. To achieve
this, eight questionnaires were randomly distributed to candidate of each of the schools. This
method was chosen because it allowed for a broad variety of responses as the respondents would
be of varies age groups, ethnicities, and genders.
120 words
Page | 8
DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENT
The data collection instrument utilized for this study was the questionnaire. The questionnaire
contained two types of questions, open-ended questions, which provides no choice or guidance
as to what the answer is, that is left entirely up to the respondent. They are very useful in getting
persons to express complicated ideas and feelings but on the other hand they are very difficult to
code. The other type of questions was close-ended, these are much simpler and they offer the
respondents a limited choice of answers, they are very easy to code but they often simplify issues
too much. They do not allow persons to reply in detail, it guides the respondent to answer in a
particular way, thus possibility exists the response is bias.
114 words
Page | 9
QUESTIONNAIRE
You are kindly asked to provide truthful answers to the questions below. All the
information provided will be kept strictly confidential; as such you are not required to
insert your name as a means of protecting your identity.
1. What gender are you?
Male□ Female□
2. To what religious sect do you belong?
3. Please state the name of your school in the line provided.
____________________________________________________
4. Which form are you in?
Form 1 □ Form 2 □ Form 3 □ Form4 to 6 □
5. What age category do you fall under?
12-14 □ 15-17 □ 18-20 □ Over 20 □
6. What ethnic group do you belong to?
African □
Chinese □
West Indian □
Page | 10
Caucasian □
Mixed □
7. To which social class do you belong?
Upper Class□ Middle Class□ Lower Class□ Neutral□
8. What does the word deviant mean to you?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
9. Have you ever committed a deviant act?
Yes□ No□
10. Have you ever seen someone committing a deviant act?
Yes□ No□
11. If your answer was yes for the question above, what action did you take?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
12. What do you think motivates an individual to commit a deviant act?
Status frustration □
Peer Pressure □
Immaturity □
A desire for material possessions □
Page | 11
To get attention/recognition □
13. In your view, are any of the reasons listed above justifiable for such actions?
Yes□ No□
14. Do you believe that some deviant acts are at times sanctioned or tolerated by some, which
make it difficult to penalize the problem in schools?
Yes□ No□
15. Do you believe that as a high school student the expectations from society are too high?
Yes □ No □
16. Which group of persons do you believe display the most deviant behavior?
Toddlers □
Young adults □
Grown adults □
17. Within recent times can you average the percentage of defacement of school property?
18. Do you believe that deviant acts are ways of demonstrated by persons as a means of
getting attention?
Yes □ No □
19. What are some of the penalties for the defacements of school property and are they
regularly enforced?
Page | 12
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
20. Would you say that parents who neglect to provide adequately for their children, or pay
attention to them, because they have some form of drug addiction or gambling problem
encourages deviant behavior?
Yes □ No □
21. Do you have any suggestions for remedying the problem of deviant behavior amongst
your peers, if so what are they?
Yes □ No □
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
22. Do you believe that defacement of school property namely graffiti is as sense of artistic
expressions?
Yes □ No □
23. Do you think that by including more curricular activities in the school syllabus will better
channel the attention of persons to more productive use of time?
Yes□ No□
Page | 13
24. Are you of the opinion that the breakdown of family life is the main contributor for the
number of deviants present in today’s schools/society?
Yes□ No□
25. Do you think that individuals, who come from poor broken homes, are most likely to
become deviants?
Yes□ No □
Thank you very much for your kind cooperation, I am extremely grateful and certain that the
information given will be of great use to me.
Yours truly,
Chantel Herbert
Page | 14
PRRESENTATION OF DATA
Figure 1 Bar chart displaying the gender percentage of respondents who have committed deviant acts.
North Eastern Col-lege
Sangre Grande Ju-nior Secondary
Bates Memorial High
Sangre Grande Ed-ucational Institute
Guaico Govern-ment Secondary
MALE 13% 22% 5% 7% 20%
FEMALE 5% 6% 11% 7% 4%
3%
8%
13%
18%
23%
13%
22%
5%
7%
20%
5%6%
11%
7%
4%
GENDER OF RESPONDENTS WHO HAVE COMMITTED DEVIANT ACTS
- MALE
- FEMALE
Page | 15
Fig 2: Displays a pie chart of the responses to question nineteen (19) which asked if deviant’s
acts are ways demonstrated by persons as a means of getting attention. Thirty one persons said
yes which total 77% and nine persons said no which accounted for 23%
YES77%
NO23%
PIE CHART
YESNO
Page | 16
Fig 3: Cluster cone diagram portrays the age group percentage of respondents who have been
involved in deviant acts.
12-14 YRS 15-17 YRS 18-20 YRS OVER 200%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Page | 17
Fig 4: Exhibits a line graph of the number of recorded deviant acts committed, for the month of
April over a period of four years in three selected schools.
2010 2009 2008 2007
Sangre Grande Junior Secondary 15 6 5 3
North Eastern College 10 4 2 3
Sangre Grande Educational Institute 5 3 3 1
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
Sangre Grande Junior SecondaryNorth Eastern CollegeSangre Grande Educational Institute
Page | 18
Fig 5: Demonstrates some of the major motivations for committing acts of deviants, according to
the responses of respondents.
22%
10%
20%
25%
23%
MOTIVATION FOR COMMITTING DEVIANT ACTS
STATUS FRUSTARTIONLACK OF EDUCATIONDESIRE FOR MATERIAL POSS-ESIONPEER PRESSUREIMMATURITY
Page | 19
Fig 6: Shows the percentage of respondent who believe that the breakdown of family life
(dysfunctional families) is responsible for the number of deviants present in today’s school
society.
YES NO
Column1 0.870000000000001 0.13
5%
15%
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
85%
Page | 20
Fig. 7: Displays a table, showing the penalties for the defacement of school property and other acts of deviance.
SCHOOL PENALTIES SUGGESTED PENALTIES BY RESPONDENTS.
Detention Repair of pay for what was damaged or stolen
Suspension Community service
Expulsion Educate others who have not yet committed acts of deviance, of the consequences of deviant behavior.
Corporal Punishment Loss of the privilege of extracurricular activities and opportunity to attend field trips.
Page | 21
ANALYSIS OF DATA
From the data collected during my research both primary and secondary information were
referenced, in an attempt to achieve the desired outcome of this study which aim it is to
determine “the extent to which labels or stigmas negatively impacts on juvenile behavior in
Secondary Schools in Sangre Grande” key questions were extracted from the data collection
instrument and was analyzed using line graphs, pie charts, tables, bar charts and other visual
presentation instruments. This provided the necessary statistics and facts to assist me with the
accomplishment of my objectives which were all efficiently met. Fig 1’s presentation looked at
the percentage of males to females who committed deviant acts in the five sample schools. The
percentage total of all schools showed that 67% of boys are responsible for deviant’s acts while
33% of girls committed deviant acts; coming out of this analysis it can be said that the male
gender is more susceptible to deviant behavior.
137 words
Page | 22
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS AND…
1. Objective 1: To determine what motives persons have for committing acts of deviance in
schools (juveniles).It was discovered that, persons are motivated to commit acts of
deviance in school, mainly as a result of peer pressure, status frustration and simply to
defile and show disrespect and disregard for the school environment, because
2. Objective 2: To observe if deviant acts are committed only by persons of a particular,
gender, age category, ethnic group, and religion or social class. It is evidenced that vast
majority of persons who have committed acts of deviance were males with the age group
of 18-20 years, but were of various ethnic groups, religions and social classes. The
number/percentage of males who responded to the questionnaire was an alarming 67%.
The reason for that being that they claimed to be under peer pressure, and come from
broken homes.
3. Objective 3: The extent to which the family unit is responsible for producing deviants as they are the primary unit of socialization. [Dysfunctional families] 87% of respondents agree with the fact that when children are poorly socialized and live in an environment not conducive to productive learning where fine examples are set, they tend to take all their suppressed attitudes and feelings of negativity into the school environment plaguing others with their disease.
4. Objective 4: To establish, if certain deviant acts are sanctioned as opposed to others.In this study it was uncovered that, certain acts of deviance are sanctioned as opposed to others and that clearly supported Howard Becker’s view that “deviance is in the eye of the beholder.”
Page | 23
Research have shown that deviant behaviour have long been a problem plaguing the school
populations; what is interesting is that the acts can be seen as a means of expressing one’s
frustration about societal norms which tend to put too much pressure on adolescents. Responders
were not afraid to voice their dissatisfaction with the penal system which they view as a cover
for the real issues plaguing society.
CONCLUSION
Pen ultimately, it can be said that deviant behaviour is heavily influenced by labeling, individuals
tends to live up to the labels that are given to them, and this leads persons to self fulfillment of
their label and they turn to a life of deviance which further leads to a life f crime. Hence, the
Howard Becker’s labeling theory strongly supports the statement. All of the aims and objectives
of this study was achieved and gave the researcher great insight into the topic of research.
364 words
Page | 24
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Sociology Themes and Perspectives; Michael Haralambos, Martin Holborn and Robin
Heald; 2004.
Caribbean Sociology Introductory Readings; Christine Barrow and Rhonda Reddock;
2001.
Sociology for Caribbean Students; Nasser Mustapha; 2010
Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance; Howard S. Becker; March 1st 1997
Crime and deviance with theory and method: As/A-level Sociology; Steve Chapman;
April 15th, 2010.
CAPE Sociology.org
JSTOR Journals.com
Siegel, Larry J. Delinquency. Belmont: Wadsworth Group, 2002.
Adams, Mike S. ET. Al.” Labeling and Delinquency.” Adolescence. Academic Search
Premier. Vol. 38 p171. San Diego, 2003.
89 words
Page | 25
Page | 26
TALLY CHART
Table illustrating the tabulated results of the
Questionnaire, the total amount of questionnaires
that was distributed was that of 40.
Questi
on
YE
SNO
MAL
E
FEMAL
EA B C D
OTHER
1 - - 27 13 - - - - -
2 - - - - 8 9 8 7 8
3 - -- -
- - - -The names of five
different schools were
given.
4 - - - - 0 0 4 36 -
5 - - - - - - 4 36 -
6 - - - - 8 2 9 11 10
7 - - - - 0 14 21 5 -
8 - - - - - - - - A variety of responses
9 40 - - - - - - - -
10 40 - - - - - - - -
11 - -- -
-100% walked
away/turned a blind
eye
12 - - - - 14 12 9 5 -
13 33 7 - - - - - - -
14 21 19 - - - - - - -
Page | 27
15 30 10 - - - - - - -
16 - - - - 0 40 0 - -
17 - -
- -
- - - -
The majority stated
between 42- 72%
others responded
otherwise
18 11 29 - - - - - - -
19 - - - - - - - -See Fig.7 or this
information
20 27 13 - - - - - - -
21 30 10 - - - - - - -
22 1 39 - - - - - - -
23 3 37 - - - - - - -
24 38 2 - - - - - - -
25 4 36 - - - - - - -
Page | 28
Page | 29