Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
Soft Landings
Gary Clark [email protected]
School of Built Environment
2
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
West Suffolk House
The energy consumption of West
Suffolk House equates to actual
emissions of 97 kgCO2/m2 per
annum, three times the design
estimate of
31.4 kgCO2/m2 per annum
Source- Carbon Trust Report
3
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
Recurring Trends of Performance Risks
Source- Bill Bordass and Rod Bunn
4
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
Soft Landings for Sustainable Buildings
Rod Bunn, BSRIA
Soft Landings is a process
for a graduated handover of
a new or refurbished
building, where a period of
professional aftercare by the
project team is a client
requirement, and planned
for and carried out from
project inception onwards
and for up to three years
post-completion.
5
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
6
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
Soft Landing Process
Source- UBT and BSRIA
7
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
Recent developments
March 2011 The Innovation and Growth Team
called for UK Government to promote Soft
Landings
May 2011 Adopted within the Government
Construction Strategy
October 17th 2011 Cabinet Office-led Soft
Landings working group established
Aim for Sept 2012 To create Soft Landings for
UK Government BIM Procurement
(Also likely to be referenced in Building
Regulations)
8
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
0. Portfolio
Management 1. Briefing 2. Concept
3. Design
Development 4. Production 5. Installation
6. As-
constructed 7. In-use
Soft Landings
Activities
Project
Sponsor
Project
Manager
SL Champion
Architect
Engineer
BIM Data
Drop
Environment
Performance
Handover/
Training
Management
Outputs
OGC Gateway
1 2 3 4 n 5
Government Soft Landings: Core Principles Overlay
SL
Business
Case
SL Brief
SL Reality
Check 1
SL Reality
Check 2
SL Tender
Documents
SL On site
Reality
Checks
SL Building
Readiness
TSB-BPE
Completion
1.Adopt the
Entire
Process
9. Involve
the Building
Managers
7. Use
Feedback to
Inform
Design
4. Ensure
Continuity
5. Commit to
Aftercare
2.Provide
Leadership
11. Set
Performance
Objectives
8. Focus on
Operational
Outcomes
6. Share Risk
and
Responsibilit
y
3.Set Roles
and
Responsibilit
ies
12.
Communicat
e and Inform
10. Involve
the End
Users
9
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
0. Portfolio
Management 1. Briefing 2. Concept
3. Design
Development 4. Production 5. Installation
6. As-
constructed 7. In-use
Soft Landings
Activities
Project
Sponsor
Project
Manager
SL Champion
Architect
Engineer
BIM Data
Drop
Environment
Performance
Handover/
Training
Management
Outputs
OGC Gateway
1 2 3 4 n 5
Government Soft Landings: Framework Overlay
Stage 1: Briefing B1: Define Roles and Responsibilities Appoint Integrated Design team with SL experience Create Collaborative and no blame team culture B2: Review Past Experience (Pre-Design) B3: Set an intermediate evaluation programme B4: Set environmental & energy performance metrics B5: Create sign-off gateways, including reality checks B6: Consider incentives for achieving performance B7: Identify critical characteristics (technical and social) Create Detailed Brief and Business Case of Requirements
Stage 2 Design and Construct D1: Review past experience (Design) Embody SL principles into design at RIBA stages C-E Carry out user consultation events at stages C-E Dynamically model design proposals at RIBA stages C-E D2: Reality Check of Design Proposals during Stages C-E Refine Design proposals itertivaly during Stages C-E
D3: Tender Documentation and Evaluation D4: Agree roles & responsibilities of contractor team Carry out Reality Checks of Contractor Design Elements Revise CD elements to align with performance targets
Carry out mock-up and insitu testing of key elements Create Control Philosphy Report with User input D5: Create commissioning Management Plan
Stage 3: Pre-Handover P1: Environmental/energy logging P2: Building Readiness Programme P3: Commissioning Records Check
P4: Maintenance Contract P5: Training and Familiarisation P6: BMS Interface Completion and Demonstration Carry out insitu envelope tests
P7: Migration Planning P8: Set up Aftercare Team Office P9: Compile Building Users Guide P10: Compile Building Technical Guide
P11: Review O&M manuals
Stage 4: Intial Aftercare
A1: Resident on-site attendance
A2: provide Workplace and data-comms links
A3: Issue and Refine Building Use Guide
A4: Issue and refine technical Guidance
A5: Produce regular newsletters and set up Helpline
A6: Walkabout building to spot emerging issues
Stage 5: Long term Aftercare
Y1: Aftercare Review Meetings (4-6 per year)
Y2: Log and Review energy Use
Y3: Review Engineering Systems and Energy use
Y4: Fine-tune systems
Y5: Record fine-tuning and changes of use
Y6: Extend Helpline and Newsletters
Y7: Continue periodic walkabouts
Y8: Measure Energy use and Occupant Satisfaction
Y9: Conduct End of Year Review
Contract incentives based on performance indicators
Dissemintate lessons learnt report through Web Portal
SL
Business
Case
SL Brief
SL Reality
Check 1
SL Reality
Check 2
SL Tender
Documents
SL On site
Reality
Checks
SL Building
Readiness
TSB-BPE
Completion
Stage 2 Design and Construct D1: Review past experience (Design) Embody SL principles into design at RIBA stages C-E Carry out user consultation events at stages C-E Dynamically model design proposals at RIBA stages C-E D2: Reality Check of Design Proposals during Stages C-E Refine Design proposals itertivaly during Stages C-E
Stage 1: Briefing
B1: Define Roles and Responsibilities
Appoint Integrated Design team with SL experience
Create Collaborative and no blame team culture
B2: Review Past Experience (Pre-Design)
B3: Set an intermediate evaluation programme
B4: Set environmental & energy performance metrics
B5: Create sign-off gateways, including reality checks
B6: Consider incentives for achieving performance
B7: Identify critical characteristics (technical and social)
Create Detailed Brief and Business Case of Requirements
Stage 1: Briefing
B1: Define Roles and Responsibilities
Appoint Integrated Design team with SL experience
Create Collaborative and no blame team culture
B2: Review Past Experience (Pre-Design)
B3: Set an intermediate evaluation programme
B4: Set environmental & energy performance metrics
B5: Create sign-off gateways, including reality checks
B6: Consider incentives for achieving performance
B7: Identify critical characteristics (technical and social)
Create Detailed Brief and Business Case of Requirements
Stage 2 Design and Construct
D1: Review past experience (Design)
Embody SL principles into design at RIBA stages C-E
Carry out user consultation events at stages C-E
Dynamically model design proposals at RIBA stages C-E
D2: Reality Check of Design Proposals during Stages C-E
Refine Design proposals itertivaly during Stages C-E
D3: Tender Documentation and Evaluation
D4: Agree roles & responsibilities of contractor team
Carry out Reality Checks of Contractor Design Elements
Revise CD elements to align with performance targets
Carry out mock-up and insitu testing of key elements
Create Control Philosphy Report with User input
D5: Create commissioning Management Plan
Stage 2 Design and Construct
D1: Review past experience (Design)
Embody SL principles into design at RIBA stages C-E
Carry out user consultation events at stages C-E
Dynamically model design proposals at RIBA stages C-E
D2: Reality Check of Design Proposals during Stages C-E
Refine Design proposals itertivaly during Stages C-E
D3: Tender Documentation and Evaluation
D4: Agree roles & responsibilities of contractor team
Carry out Reality Checks of Contractor Design Elements
Revise CD elements to align with performance targets
Carry out mock-up and insitu testing of key elements
Create Control Philosphy Report with User input
D5: Create commissioning Management Plan
Stage 3: Pre-Handover
P1: Environmental/energy logging
P2: Building Readiness Programme
P3: Commissioning Records Check
P4: Maintenance Contract
P5: Training and Familiarisation
P6: BMS Interface Completion and Demonstration
Carry out insitu envelope tests
P7: Migration Planning
P8: Set up Aftercare Team Office
P9: Compile Building Users Guide
P10: Compile Building Technical Guide
P11: Review O&M manuals
Stage 3: Pre-Handover
P1: Environmental/energy logging
P2: Building Readiness Programme
P3: Commissioning Records Check
P4: Maintenance Contract
P5: Training and Familiarisation
P6: BMS Interface Completion and Demonstration
Carry out insitu envelope tests
P7: Migration Planning
P8: Set up Aftercare Team Office
P9: Compile Building Users Guide
P10: Compile Building Technical Guide
P11: Review O&M manuals
Stage 4: Intial Aftercare
A1: Resident on-site attendance
A2: provide Workplace and data-comms links
A3: Issue and Refine Building Use Guide
A4: Issue and refine technical Guidance
A5: Produce regular newsletters and set up Helpline
A6: Walkabout building to spot emerging issues
Stage 4: Intial Aftercare
A1: Resident on-site attendance
A2: provide Workplace and data-comms links
A3: Issue and Refine Building Use Guide
A4: Issue and refine technical Guidance
A5: Produce regular newsletters and set up Helpline
A6: Walkabout building to spot emerging issues
Stage 5: Long term Aftercare
Y1: Aftercare Review Meetings (4-6 per year)
Y2: Log and Review energy Use
Y3: Review Engineering Systems and Energy use
Y4: Fine-tune systems
Y5: Record fine-tuning and changes of use
Y6: Extend Helpline and Newsletters
Y7: Continue periodic walkabouts
Y8: Measure Energy use and Occupant Satisfaction
Y9: Conduct End of Year Review
Contract incentives based on performance indicators
Dissemintate lessons learnt report through Web Portal
Stage 5: Long term Aftercare
Y1: Aftercare Review Meetings (4-6 per year)
Y2: Log and Review energy Use
Y3: Review Engineering Systems and Energy use
Y4: Fine-tune systems
Y5: Record fine-tuning and changes of use
Y6: Extend Helpline and Newsletters
Y7: Continue periodic walkabouts
Y8: Measure Energy use and Occupant Satisfaction
Y9: Conduct End of Year Review
Contract incentives based on performance indicators
Dissemintate lessons learnt report through Web Portal
10
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
Government Soft Landings: BIM Process Map
11
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
Assets designed to meet operational outcomes and user needs
Smoother handover between Contractor and Operational Teams
Extended Aftercare service to optimise asset performance
=
Lower Energy Use and Costs
Lower Carbon Emissions
Lower Maintenance Requirements
Higher occupant satisfaction
Better perceived occupant productivity and health
Soft Landings Business Case
Source- GVA Grimley
12
Design for buildability, usability and manageability
What is the Scottish Government position on BIM and Soft Landings?
Is this relevant to your sector?
Are you already doing some aspects of Soft Landings?
What are the benefits?
How much does it cost?
How do I implement it?
How can academia help me?
What does this mean to you?
Source- GVA Grimley
13
Design for buildability, usability and manageability 13
Recurring Risk-Unresolved Defects
Soft Landings Mitigation: Fine-tuning aftercare service
2000 kWh/day, or £ 200 per day at 10 p/kWh, or £40,000 a year saving
Source- Buro Happold