27
Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails By: Dr. Anton VanderWyst Date: 26 June, 2014

Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails. By: Dr. Anton VanderWyst Date: 26 June, 2014. Outline. Description of light sail concept Solar powered Laser powered Plasma powered Fission powered One and two sail operation Issues associated with light sails Sail material and missions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

By: Dr. Anton VanderWystDate: 26 June, 2014

Page 2: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 2Space SailsAPISG401

OutlineDescription of light sail concept

Solar poweredLaser poweredPlasma poweredFission poweredOne and two sail operation

Issues associated with light sailsSail material and missionsSail mass and volumeLow thrust trajectoriesSolar and laser power neededThermally limited accelerationInstersteller dust impactsRelativistic redshifting responses

Description of magnetic sail conceptTraditional magnetMagnet size and power needsMini-magnetospheric plasma

propulsion (M2P2)Particle beam propulsion

Conclusion

References

Page 3: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 3Space SailsAPISG401

Light sail concept

Propellant mass is the dominant concern in modern space craft design. Propellantless methods of space propulsion provide breakthrough performance possibilities. They allow 92+% of the mass to be removed.

The scientific and engineering challenges for this category of space travel will be presented as well as several unique proposed technological responses.

Page 4: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 4Space SailsAPISG401

Solar powered sail Solar sails would propel a spacecraft by utilizing the pressure created by the stream of photons (tiny units of light energy) from the sun. Once a spacecraft is in orbit, a lightweight sail would unfurl. Changing the position of the sail would increase or decrease speed. The thrust created by the photon stream is extremely low and interplanetary journeys would take years [8].

5 year Earth-Mars trajectory

Page 5: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 5Space SailsAPISG401

Plasma and laser powered sails

clip

Page 6: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 6Space SailsAPISG401

Avoid problem of miniscule solar pressure by providing your own power source.

Require massive orbiting power stations.

Numerous ideas exist and have been experimentally tested. They include a magbeam [4] and focused plasma beams [6].

Ideas all exist at TRL 0-3. Have pointing accuracy and thermal

issues.

Plasma and laser powered sails II

Page 7: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 7Space SailsAPISG401

Fission powered sail

The fission sail is a type of spacecraft propulsion proposed by Robert Forward that uses fission fragments to propel a large solar sail-like craft. a plastic layerb radionuclides layerf neutralizer electron beam

Defaults uses standard radio-acitve decay & catches products

A 10 kg instrument payload could be sent to 250 AU in 10 years using 30 mg of antihydrogen.

Preliminary calculations predict 17 g of antihydrogen could send a similar probe to the next star in 40 years.

Isp = 1.4 million seconds Except … global antimatter production in all history: < 1g Current antimatter cost: $300 million / g

Page 8: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 8Space SailsAPISG401

One and two stage sails Sail design dictated by what you want to

do once you get to the destination. The easiest is a flyby, with a one stage

sail shooting back at maximum speed. Would traverse the entire solar system in <1 day, with ~3 minutes per planet useful viewing time.

To analyze a target, need to stop upon arrival.

Laser light from Earth (or a transmitter in Earth orbit) would be beamed at the sail. The first (white) stage would focus and redirect this light onto the second (yellow) stage.

Page 9: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 9Space SailsAPISG401

Light sail analysis

Page 10: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 10Space SailsAPISG401

Sail mass and area To operate with minimal mass, the system spin- or three-axis- stabilized. Acceleration driven by areal density (sail loading). Great values are <1 g/m2. That gets you to the end of the solar system in ~20 years.

Energy and force miniscule, where h = Planck’s constant = 6.63e-34 J-s. Teaser: momentum of a photon is where the school of quantum mechanics first begins to emerge as a consequence of Debroglie's hypothesis. Total energy is a function of wavelength. Effective areas are >> 10 km2. At 1/10th water density and 10 nm thick super-sail, could pack into 1 m3. … and impossible to unfurl due to static electricity. Would shred if you lightly blew on it. The lightest current 10 x 10 m sail placed 1 AU from the sun gives 3x10-12 N force, and accelerates at 1 picometer / s2. It would travel 1 meter in 13 days.

22

22 cos12.9

AURsm

c

mANF OB

SS

hc

HzhJEphoton ][][

Page 11: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 11Space SailsAPISG401

Other uses for light sails

1) An antenna for communications, to help focus radio transmissions from earth

2) A dust detector – spacecraft are hit by dust continually when in space, and the number of dust impacts increase with size and speed. Solar sails can measure the impacts via total energy measurements.

3) Etching out parts of the solar sail surface, and using that as antenna to pick up radio waves. We'd use this as a phased array radio receiver.

4) Make a Fresnel lens using an interference effect.

5) NEO diversion [14]

Fresnel lens

Sample phased arrays

NASA ST5 antenna

Page 12: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 12Space SailsAPISG401

Sail material and missions

Proposed sail materials are mylar, aluminum, aluminized plastics or nanotubes. Common thicknesses are 0.01 – 10 microns. Note a grain of salt is 60 microns wide.

The boom uses temperature, UV or other techniques to control rigidity. Most designs use air to inflate it, but maintain geometry in other ways. There are supporting guy wires that help keep it rigid. There is a problem with tacking and changing directions.

Useful ranges for usage are 0.5-3 AU. NASA’s New Millennium Missions address needed technologies. Science Technology 7-9 projects directed at specific capabilities, such as booms, unfolding and tacking.

Solar Sail Missions: Launched Cosmos I sail in June

2005 aboard Russian Volna [5]. Sail size: 600 m2

Launched NanoSail-D sail 2 Aug., 2008 aboard SpaceX Falcon 1. Sail size: 5 m2

JAXA IKAROS, launched 2010, spotted at 2 AU in May 2014

Sunjammer, Falcon9 launch in 2015. Sail size: (124 ft) 1,200 m2

Heliostorm. Tentative launch in 2018. Sail size: 22,500 m2

Solar Polar Imager (SPI). Tentative launch in 2027. Sail size: 22,500 m2

Interstellar Probe. Sail size: >100,000 m2

Page 13: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 13Space SailsAPISG401

Sail trajectories

Pioneer 4 rocket trajectory

Earth-Mars EP trajectory

Modeling low, continuous thrusttrajectories is very difficult.

The effect of acceleration is mm/s2, so you cannot see it

Unlike a rocket, very small external perturbations need to be accurately accounted for. This includes the solar wind variation, 2 planet gravitational forces and interstellar particle Brownian motion.

Very large sails have differential gravitational pulls across surface

Need redundancy for cable breaks & possible

cell damage Can leverage existing electric propulsion

trajectory codes like SEPTOP [10].

Page 14: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 14Space SailsAPISG401

Power needed Laser sails can provide greater power

density. Solar provides roughly 1.6 kW/m2 and

decreases 1/r2. Lasers can provide TW/m2, which will vaporize the sail.

Minimum focusing transmitter size is when diffraction limited on receiver

Dr=2.44√L/Dt

where Dr is the receiver diameter, 2.44 is the first diffraction minimum (“Airy Disk”), is the laser power wavelength, L is the distance and Dt is the transmitter diameter. A 1 micron IR beam fired from a 1,000 km-wide Earth lens spreads out to 1,000 km receiver by 43 LY away. At 4.3 LY, it is a 316 km wide sail.

Rayleigh criterion dictates how the effects of diffraction limit the size of a spot you can focus onto an object. As you move further away from a highly collimated laser, diffraction theory says that the spot size must increase. However, smaller wavelength = smaller spots

Page 15: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 15Space SailsAPISG401

Power needed, II Common needed space power ranges

are 0.01-100 TW (1010 – 1014 W). • Total Earth average power is 15 GW

(1010 W) National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Law.

Livermore building world’s most powerful laser, at 1.2 PW (1015 W)

Airborne Laser (ABL) is MW-class.

absorbreflecspot

sailpaysaillaser n

caMMP

2

c

TTna

sailabsorb

spacebackfrontSBabsorbreflec

44

maxmax

2

Would require 2-6 order of magnitude increase in power/weight ratio.

The Space Shuttle engines provide 164 kW/kg. That leads to a 61,000-ton space laser.

A full system mass to travel 40 LY is 210 billion tons (p. 104)

The ISS is currently 287 tons after 9 years and 26 dedicated Shuttle flights.

Page 16: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 16Space SailsAPISG401

Flight issues

During the years of flight operation, there are a large variety of possible failure modes. They include:

Deployment and tacking [13] Thermal warping [11] Wobble control [12] Short circuits Solar radiation (solar wind) Erosion

Maximum acceleration limited by radiation cooling limit. If any more power was applied, the sail would melt.

A fast moving sail therefore must:• Be extremely light (low density )• Have high backside emissivity • Possess high maximum temperature

(note Tmax << Tmelt due to thin film agglomeration)

• Have very high reflectivity reflec

• Absorb minimal thermal energy

Could also power by microwaves closer, but cannot focus at a distance.

Page 17: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 17Space SailsAPISG401

Interstellar debris impacts A light sail will impact space debris. While Dyson spheres and Bussard

interstellar fusion ramjets need such interactions, sails don’t appreciate impacts at 0.5c (335 million mph).

Interstellar hydrogen densities are roughly 1 atom / cm3 with 10-12 dust particles / cm3. At full speed with a 10 km x 10 km sail, that is a travel volume of 1023 cm3/ s = 1011 impacts / second.

However, it isn’t all that bad, and you won’t lose thrust [15]. Key factors are:

Relative impact time. The dust takes 10-16 sec to travel through the sheet.

No heat can be transferred. No tearing occurs – it punches

Relative size of sail. Think how much % dough a cookie cutter removes

Dust impact severity highly depends on travel through the local interstellarcloud.

Page 18: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 18Space SailsAPISG401

Relativistic redshift impacts

The much greater problem is the substantial growth in power needed as the sail velocity increases. The redshift effect kills us at 0.5c due to

Change in laser output wavelength to 3x the starting frequency

2nd stage rendezvous stage size increase of 200% Laser power increase of 73% Sail diameter increase of 31% Sail mass increase of 15%

Can get greater force by increasing the frequency of the photon and increasing its probability of reflection.

If it were possible to develop an ultra light weight material that reflects x-rays, it would be possible to focus a smaller spot on the solar sail from earth based lasers.

2

2

1

1

1

1

cVM

McVcV

r

r

Page 19: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 19Space SailsAPISG401

Light sail review

Light sails, whether powered by natural solar or manmade lasers, have a specific niche they occupy in space propulsion. Their benefits include:

• No onboard propulsion needed means a very wide variety of possible space missions become feasible.

• Scalable.• Sail itself is reasonable cost.• Already launched four, so base technology is very well understood and

possesses a high TRL.

Difficulties:• Power needs for even small missions rapidly become exorbitant.• Cannot currently make a structure that is light enough. System

performance dictated by sail density.• Releasing, unfolding and steering are difficult.• Supporting infrastructure needs exponentially grow.

Page 20: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 20Space SailsAPISG401

Magnetic sail analysis

Page 21: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 21Space SailsAPISG401

Standard magnetic sail The magnetic sail is a use of Lenz’s Law (flux will attempt to remain constant in a electrified wire loop). The loop should be made from superconducting wires, and will expand to a circle when powered. The craft will be attached to this loop. Charged particles meeting the loop or magsail at other angles than parallel to the magnetic field will transfer some of their momentum to the field and thus push the craft. A magsail weighing 36 tons could receive accelerations of 0.1 mm/s2 to 9 mm/s2; varying with the sail orientation. The magnetic loop is very small compared to a standard light sail, being only about 10 km in diameter.

Page 22: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 22Space SailsAPISG401

Supersized magnetic sail World record magnetic field is >37 T [16] Earth’s field is 30-60 T (0.3-0.6 Gauss) World record current density is > 7e8 [A/m2] World record current is 20 kA at CERN National High Field Magnetic Laboratory

has 21 T, 5 m tall, 13 ton, 40 MJ magnet. Problem is that to create a large field

requires‒ Very large and heavy magnets‒ Energy replacement due to charge loss

Result is cannot get a large enough mag. field cheaply enough [17]

Thrust thrust 10

AUthrust 100

AU Mass radiusStart

energyEnergy loss/day

Battery mass/day

[N] [N] [N] [MT] [km] [MJ] [MJ] [kg]

3 0.1 0.00 0.1 6 6,194 149 74

9 0.4 0.00 0.5 10 9,252 222 111

27 1.2 0.01 1.4 18 13,344 320 160

Page 23: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 23Space SailsAPISG401

Mini magnetospheric plasma propulsion To reduce the cost of increasing the magnetic field radius, Mini magnetospheric plasma propulsion (M2P2) has been introduced. M2P2 still uses magnetic fields to create a large barrier to incoming particles and plasmas. The reflection of those energy fields allow very low propellant propulsion. However, it injects low-energy plasma to artifically generate a mini-magnetosphere [2]. This locally stronger magnetic field results in Isp ~35,000 seconds [1].

clip

clip

Page 24: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 24Space SailsAPISG401

Particle beam behavior

Space particle beams can be used in magsails [18]. Benefits include:

ISPs [15,000 – 45,000] range Suited for interstellar precursor

miss.

Problems include: Requires a dedicated beamed

momentum source Particles hit a pusher plate or

reflect of EM wall Beam can be deflected by solar

magnetic fields. Relativistic velocities make

closed-loop control impossible. Neutral particles are unaffected

by EM fields

Particle beam generator

MagSail operation

Page 25: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 25Space SailsAPISG401

Conclusions Several different ‘no to minimal’ propellant methods of imparting

momentum to space vehicles have been presented. Solar, laser, fission, magnetic and particle beams have been examined. The state of the art, future programs, benefits and challenges have been

identified. Each of these approaches has already been ground tested and shows

appreciable promise for Moon to the edge of solar system missions. All require substantial additional scientific and engineering development

before they become common methods of intersolar propulsion. The minimal propellant needed enables a large variety of missions,

spanning the thrust and time ranges.

Page 26: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 26Space SailsAPISG401

References[1] Winglee et al., “Simulation of mini-magnetospheric plasma propulsion (M2P2) interacting

with an external plasma wind”. AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference, 2003.

[2] Mini-Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion (M2P2) Space propulsion group at the University of Washington. http://www.ess.washington.edu/Space/M2P2 /technical.html

[3] Winglee et al., “M2P2: tapping the energy of the solar wind for spacecraft propulsion”. J. Geophysical research, 150(A9) p. 21067, Sept. 2000.

[4] Winglee, R. and Ziemba, T. “MagBeam phase I final report for NASA institute for advanced concepts”. 30 April 2005.

[5] Cosmos I, launched by the Planetary Society in 2005. http://www.planetary.org/programs/projects/solar_sailing/

[6] http://www.nas.nasa.gov/About/Education/SpaceSettlement/SolarSails/links.html

[7] http://www.space.com/common/media/video/player.php?videoRef= LS_090519_Space-Engines

[8] McInnes, C. R. Solar Sailing: Technology, Dynamics and Mission Applications. Springer-Verlag, 1999.

[9] http://sail.quarkweb.com/light.htm

[10] Woodcock, G. R. and Dankanich, J. “Application of solar-electric propulsion to robotic and human missions in near-Earth space”. AIAA 2006-4464, JPC 10 July 2006.

[11] Endicter, J. et. al. “GOES-I/M yaw momentum anomaly analysis and recovery”, SpaceOps AIAA 2008-3422. 2008.

Page 27: Solar, Laser, Magnetic and Fission Space Sails

Page 27Space SailsAPISG401

References, II[12] Bajora, A. and Arora, N., and Globus, A. “Kalpana one: a new space colony design”. Space

Knowledge, On Orbital Space Settlement #06. 1 Nov. 2007.

[13] Herbeck, L. et. al. “Development and test of deployable ultra-lightweight CFRP-booms for a solar sail”, European Conf. on Spacecraft Structures, ESA SP-468 Mar. 2001.

[14] Dachwald, B. and Wie, B. “Solar sail trajectory optimization for intercepting, impacting and deflecting near-Earth asteroids”, AIAA 2005-6176, San Francisco, CA 2005.

[15] Frisbee, R. H., “Beamed-momentum lightsails for interstellar missions: mission applications and technology requirements”, AIAA 2004-3567, 11 July 2004.

[16] Asano, T. et. al. “resistive insert magnet for a 37.3-T hybrid magnet”, Physics B: Condensed Matter, 294, pp 635-638, Jan. 2001.

[17] http://www.sjgames.com/gurps/Roleplayer/Roleplayer29/MagSails.html[18] Bishop, F. “Some novel space propulsion systems”, J. Aircraft Engineering and

Aerospace Technology, 75:3, pp. 247-255. 2003.