Upload
samina-tahir-khan
View
232
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
1/25
Dissolution
Dissolution is defined as the process by
which solid substances enter in a solventto yield a solution
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
2/25
Factors affecting dissolution rate
1. Physicochemical properties of a drug
2. Drug product formulation
3. Processing factors4. Dissolution test parameters
5. Miscellaneous factors
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
3/25
1. Physicochemical properties
Effect of solubility
Aqueous solubility of a drug is a major factor
that determines the dissolution rate
Drug solubility data could be used as a rough
predictor of the possibility of any problems
with bioavailability.
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
4/25
1. Physicochemical properties
Effect of particle size Dissolution rate is directly proportional to the
surface area of the drug.
Surface area increases with decrease inparticle size, thus reduction in particle sizeresults in increased dissolution rate.
Micronization of certain poorly soluble drugs
has resulted in improved dissolution rates. E.g. chloramphenicol, tetracycline, sulfadiazine
etc.
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
5/25
1. Physicochemical properties
Effect of solid phase characteristics Amorphicity and crytallinity are 2 important
characteristics that affect drug dissolution
rate. Studies have confirmed that amorphous form
exhibits higher dissolution rate than crystallineform.
E.g. phenobarbitol exhibits higher dissolutionrate and bioavailability in amorphous form.
One contradictory example is that oferythromycin.
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
6/25
2. Factors related to drug product
formulation Effect of granulating agents and
binders.
Phenobarbital tablets granulated with gelatinexhibit higher dissolution rate than those
granulated with CMC or PEG
Even gelatin obtained from different
processes and sources has shown to affectthe dissolution rate.
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
7/25
2. Factors related to drug product
formulation Effect of disintegrants and diluents
Increasing the amount of starch in a
formulation has shown to improve the
dissolution rate.
Effect of lubricant
The nature, quality and quantity of a lubricant
can affect dissolution rate
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
8/25
3. Processing factors
Method of granulation
Wet granulation has been shown to improve
dissolution rate by imparting hydrophillicity.
Compressional force
High compression force can increase tablet
hardness and consequently decrease solventpenetrability, thus decreasing the dissolution
rate.
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
9/25
4. Factors related to dosage form
Drug excepient interaction
This can occur during any unit operation like
mixing, blending, drying or granulation.
E.g. the effect of magnesium stearate on
disintegration time of tablets containing potato
starch.
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
10/25
5. Effect of test parameters
Stirring device
Eccentricity of the stirring device needs to be
minimized.
Vibration
Vibration is a common variable introduced
due to numerous causes and it needs to beeliminated.
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
11/25
5. Effect of test parameters
Alignment of the stirring element
temperature
Dissolution medium
pH of the medium Viscosity
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
12/25
Miscellaneous parameters
Adsorption
Humidity
Detection errors
Compendial method
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
13/25
Compendial dissolution testing
apparatuses BASKET APPARATUS (I)
PADDLE APPARATUS (II)
RECIPROCATING CYLINDER (III)
FLOW-THROUGH CELL (IV)
PADDLE OVER DISK (V)
CYLINDER (VI)
RECIPROCATING HOLDER (VII)
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
14/25
Basket apparatus
The assembly consistsof: vessel
motor metallic drive shaft
cylindrical basket. The vessel is partially
immersed in a suitablewater bath of anyconvenient size
A suitable heating devicethat permits holding thetemperature inside thevessel at 37 0.5 C
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
15/25
Basket apparatus
The vessel is cylindrical, with ahemispherical bottom.
A speed-regulating device (motor) isused that allows the shaft rotation
speed to be selected andmaintained at the specified rategiven in the individual monograph,within 4%
Cover may be used to retardevaporation.
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
16/25
Basket apparatus
Useful for capsules
delayed release /
entericcoated dosage forms
floating dosage forms
Standard volume 900/1000 ml
1, 2, 4 liter vessels
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
17/25
Advantages
Breadth of experience (more than 200
monographs)
Full pH change during the test
Can be easily automated which is important
for routine investigations
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
18/25
Weaknesses of the basket method
Hindered visual inspection Disintegration-dissolutioninteraction
Poor homogeneity of the bulk fluid due to insufficientstirring or agitation
Sensitivity against external vibration, wobble, eccentricity
limited volume
Inconvenience for cleaning the set-up after testing
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
19/25
Paddle apparatus
Use the assembly fromApparatus 1, except that apaddle formed from a bladeand a shaft is used as thestirring element.
The distance of 25 2 mmbetween the bottom of theblade and the inside bottom ofthe vessel is maintained duringthe test.
The metallic or suitably inert,rigid blade and shaft comprisea single entity.
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
20/25
Paddle apparatus
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
21/25
Sinker types
JP/ USP / Ph. Eur.5.3 Sinker
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
22/25
Paddle apparatus
Useful for tablets
capsules
delayed release / entericcoated dosage forms
Standard volume
900/1000 ml
Method of first choice !!!
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
23/25
Advantages of paddle apparatus
easy to use
robust
can be easily adapted to apparatus 5 long experience
pH change possible
can be easily automated
which is important for
routine investigations
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
24/25
Weaknesses of paddle apparatus
Problems with floating dosage units
The use of spiral for holding capsules is subject
to variability with operators.
The non-dispersion of disintegrated tablets can
lead to non-reproducibility of test
Coning
8/6/2019 Solid Dosage 3
25/25