3
Inventi Impact: Fuzzy System Vol. 2012, Issue 3 [ISSN 2277-2316] 2012 efs 025, CCC: $10 © Inventi Journals (P) Ltd Published on Web 15/07/2012, www.inventi.in RESEARCH ARTICLE 1. INTRODUCTION In [4], Othman has introduced the concept of fuzzy sp-open sets. Several notions based on fuzzy sp-open (closed) set and fuzzy sp-continuous mapping have been studied. Moreover, the study also included the relationships between those concepts and some other weaker forms of fuzzy open sets and fuzzy continuous mappings. In [1], Azad introduced the concept of fuzzy almost continuity and fuzzy weakly continuity. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the notions of fuzzy almost sp-continuous mapping, fuzzy weakly sp-continuous mapping and fuzzy faintly sp-continuous mapping and to investigate some properties of these notions and the relationship between them. Furthermore using sp-connectedness and the new concept sp-compactness we prove some properties of weakly sp-continuous mappings. 2. PRELIMINARIES Throughout this paper by (X, τ) or simply by X we mean a fuzzy topological space (fts, shortly) and f : X Y means a mapping f from a fuzzy topological space X to a fuzzy topological space Y . If u is a fuzzy set and p is a fuzzy singleton in X, then N (p), Int u, cl u, u c , cl δ u, sp Int u, sp cl u, FSP − O(X) and FSP − C(X), will denote respectively, the neighbourhood system of p, the interior of u, the closure of u, complement of u, the fuzzy δ-closure of a fuzzy set u, the fuzzy sp-interior of a fuzzy set u, the fuzzy sp-closure of a fuzzy set u, the family of all fuzzy sp-open sets of (X, τ ) and the family of all fuzzy sp-closed sets of (X, τ ). Now, we mention the following definitions and results which are used in this paper concerning fuzzy topology. Definition 2.1 [3] A fuzzy singleton p in X is a fuzzy set defined by: p(x) = t, for x = x 0 and p(x) = 0 otherwise, where 0 < t ≤ 1. The point p is said to have support x 0 and value t. Definition 2.2 A fuzzy set λ in a f ts X is called fuzzy preopen [5], (resp. fuzzy sp-open [4], fuzzy δ-open) set if λ ≤ Int cl λ (resp. λ ≤ Int cl (λ) cl Int (λ), for x λ, there exists a regular open set μ such that x µ ≤ λ. The family of all fuzzy preopen (resp. fuzzy sp-open) sets of X is denoted by F P O(X) (resp. FSP − O(X), FδO (X)). 1 Department of Mathematics, University College of Alqunfudah, Umm Alqura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia. 2 Department of Mathematics, College of Education and Science, Rada'a, Albayda University, Albayda, Republic of Yemen. E-mail: [email protected] *Correspondig author Theorem 2.3 [4] For a fuzzy subset λ of a fuzzy space X, the following statements hold: sp − cl λ ≥ λ (Int cl λ cl Int λ). sp − Int λ ≤ λ (Int cl λ cl Int λ). Definition 2.4 A mapping f: (X, τ) (Y, σ) is said to be: Fuzzy almost continuous [1] if f 1 (μ) is fuzzy open set in X for each fuzzy regular open set μ in Y. Fuzzy weakly continuous [1] if for each fuzzy open set μ of Y, f 1 (µ) ≤ Int f 1 (cl μ). Fuzzy sp -continuous [4] if f −1 (μ) is fuzzy sp-open (fuzzy sp-closed) set in X for each fuzzy open (fuzzy closed) set μ in Y 3. MAIN RESULTS On this section fuzzy almost sp-continuous, fuzzy weakly sp-continuous, fuzzy faintly sp-continuous and fuzzy almost open mappings and fuzzy sp-compactness are defined and some interesting properties related to these definitions are obtained. Definition 3.1 A mapping f : (X, τ ) (Y, σ) is said to be fuzzy weakly sp- continuous if for each fuzzy singleton p X and each fuzzy open set μ of Y containing f (p), there exists λ F SP − O(X) containing p such that f (λ) ≤ cl (µ). Theorem 3.2 For a mapping f: (X, τ) (Y, σ), the following statements are equivalent: f is a fuzzy weakly sp-continuous at fuzzy singleton p X; A fuzzy singleton p cl Int (f −1 (cl(μ))) Int cl (f −1 (cl μ)) for each fuzzy neighbourhood μ of f (p); f −1 (µ) ≤ sp − Int (f −1 (clμ)) for every fuzzy open set μ of Y ; f −1 (µ) ≤ cl Int (f −1 (cl(μ))) Int (cl (f −1 (cl μ))) for every fuzzy open set μ of Y . Proof: (i) (ii). Let μ be any fuzzy neighbourhood of f (p). Since f is weakly sp-continuous at all fuzzy singleton p X, there exists λ F SP−O(X) such that f (λ) ≤ cl (µ). Then λ ≤ f 1 (clµ). Since λ is fuzzy sp-open such that p λ ≤ cl Int (λ) Int cl (λ) ≤ cl Int (f −1 (cl μ)) Int cl (f −1 (clμ)). (ii) (iii). Let a fuzzy singleton p f 1 (μ), so f (p) μ. Where μ is open. Then p f 1 (cl(μ)) and since p cl Int (f 1 (cl (μ))) Int cl (f 1 (clμ)) we have p f 1 (clμ) [cl Int (f 1 (cl(μ))) Intcl (f 1 (clµ))] ≤ sp −Int(f 1 (cl(μ)). Hence f 1 (μ) ≤ sp − Int (f 1 (cl (μ)). Some Weaker Forms of Fuzzy SP-continuous Mappings Hakeem A Othman 1,2* Abstracts: The aim of this paper is to introduce some new weaker forms of fuzzy sp continuity, namely fuzzy almost sp- continuous mappings; fuzzy weakly sp-continuous mappings and fuzzy faintly sp-continuous mappings by using the notion of fuzzy sp-open sets. Certain fundamental properties, some new results related to these new concepts are obtained, fuzzy sp- compact is introduced and the relations and inverse relations between these new fuzzy mappings are investigated. 158

Some Weaker Forms of Fuzzy SP-continuous Mappings (2)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The aim of this paper is to introduce some new weaker forms of fuzzy sp continuity, namely fuzzy almost spcontinuousmappings; fuzzy weakly sp-continuous mappings and fuzzy faintly sp-continuous mappings by using the notion offuzzy sp-open sets. Certain fundamental properties, some new results related to these new concepts are obtained, fuzzy spcompactis introduced and the relations and inverse relations between these new fuzzy mappings are investigated

Citation preview

Page 1: Some Weaker Forms of Fuzzy SP-continuous Mappings (2)

Inventi Impact: Fuzzy System Vol. 2012, Issue 3 [ISSN 2277-2316]

2012 efs 025, CCC: $10 © Inventi Journals (P) Ltd Published on Web 15/07/2012, www.inventi.in

RESEARCH ARTICLE

1. INTRODUCTION In [4], Othman has introduced the concept of fuzzy sp-open sets. Several notions based on fuzzy sp-open (closed) set and fuzzy sp-continuous mapping have been studied. Moreover, the study also included the relationships between those concepts and some other weaker forms of fuzzy open sets and fuzzy continuous mappings. In [1], Azad introduced the concept of fuzzy almost continuity and fuzzy weakly continuity. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the notions of fuzzy almost sp-continuous mapping, fuzzy weakly sp-continuous mapping and fuzzy faintly sp-continuous mapping and to investigate some properties of these notions and the relationship between them. Furthermore using sp-connectedness and the new concept sp-compactness we prove some properties of weakly sp-continuous mappings. 2. PRELIMINARIES Throughout this paper by (X, τ) or simply by X we mean a fuzzy topological space (fts, shortly) and f : X → Y means a mapping f from a fuzzy topological space X to a fuzzy topological space Y . If u is a fuzzy set and p is a fuzzy singleton in X, then N (p), Int u, cl u, uc, clδ u, sp – Int u, sp – cl u, FSP − O(X) and FSP − C(X), will denote respectively, the neighbourhood system of p, the interior of u, the closure of u, complement of u, the fuzzy δ-closure of a fuzzy set u, the fuzzy sp-interior of a fuzzy set u, the fuzzy sp-closure of a fuzzy set u, the family of all fuzzy sp-open sets of (X, τ ) and the family of all fuzzy sp-closed sets of (X, τ ).

Now, we mention the following definitions and results which are used in this paper concerning fuzzy topology. Definition 2.1 [3] A fuzzy singleton p in X is a fuzzy set defined by: p(x) = t, for x = x0 and p(x) = 0 otherwise, where 0 < t ≤ 1. The point p is said to have support x0 and value t. Definition 2.2 A fuzzy set λ in a f ts X is called fuzzy preopen [5], (resp. fuzzy sp-open [4], fuzzy δ-open) set if λ ≤ Int cl λ (resp. λ ≤ Int cl (λ) ∨ cl Int (λ), for x ∈ λ, there exists a regular open set µ such that x ∈ µ ≤ λ. The family of all fuzzy preopen (resp. fuzzy sp-open) sets of X is denoted by F P O(X) (resp. FSP − O(X), FδO (X)).

1Department of Mathematics, University College of Alqunfudah, Umm Alqura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia. 2Department of Mathematics, College of Education and Science, Rada'a, Albayda University, Albayda, Republic of Yemen. E-mail: [email protected] *Correspondig author

Theorem 2.3 [4] For a fuzzy subset λ of a fuzzy space X, the following statements hold: sp − cl λ ≥ λ ∨ (Int cl λ ∧ cl Int λ). sp − Int λ ≤ λ ∧ (Int cl λ ∨ cl Int λ). Definition 2.4 A mapping f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ) is said to be: Fuzzy almost continuous [1] if f −1 (µ) is fuzzy open set

in X for each fuzzy regular open set µ in Y. Fuzzy weakly continuous [1] if for each fuzzy open set µ

of Y, f−1 (µ) ≤ Int f −1 (cl µ). Fuzzy sp -continuous [4] if f −1(µ) is fuzzy sp-open (fuzzy

sp-closed) set in X for each fuzzy open (fuzzy closed) set µ in Y

3. MAIN RESULTS On this section fuzzy almost sp-continuous, fuzzy weakly sp-continuous, fuzzy faintly sp-continuous and fuzzy almost open mappings and fuzzy sp-compactness are defined and some interesting properties related to these definitions are obtained. Definition 3.1 A mapping f : (X, τ ) → (Y, σ) is said to be fuzzy weakly sp- continuous if for each fuzzy singleton p ∈ X and each fuzzy open set µ of Y containing f (p), there exists λ ⊆ F SP − O(X) containing p such that f (λ) ≤ cl (µ). Theorem 3.2 For a mapping f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ), the following statements are equivalent: f is a fuzzy weakly sp-continuous at fuzzy singleton p ∈ X; A fuzzy singleton p ∈ cl Int (f −1(cl(µ))) ∨ Int cl (f−1(cl µ))

for each fuzzy neighbourhood µ of f (p); f −1(µ) ≤ sp − Int (f −1(clµ)) for every fuzzy open set µ of Y ; f −1(µ) ≤ cl Int (f −1(cl(µ))) ∨ Int (cl (f−1(cl µ))) for every

fuzzy open set µ of Y . Proof: (i) ⇒ (ii). Let µ be any fuzzy neighbourhood of f (p). Since f is weakly sp-continuous at all fuzzy singleton p ∈ X, there exists λ ⊆ F SP−O(X) such that f (λ) ≤ cl (µ). Then λ ≤ f

−1 (clµ). Since λ is fuzzy sp-open such that p ∈ λ ≤ cl Int (λ) ∨ Int cl (λ) ≤ cl Int (f −1 (cl µ)) ∨ Int cl (f −1 (clµ)). (ii) ⇒ (iii). Let a fuzzy singleton p ∈ f −1 (µ), so f (p) ∈ µ. Where µ is open. Then p ∈ f −1(cl(µ)) and since p ∈ cl Int (f

−1(cl (µ))) ∨ Int cl (f−1(clµ)) we have p ∈ f −1(clµ) ∧ [cl Int (f

−1(cl(µ))) ∨ Intcl (f−1(clµ))] ≤ sp −Int(f −1(cl(µ)). Hence f−1 (µ) ≤ sp − Int (f−1 (cl (µ)).

Some Weaker Forms of Fuzzy SP-continuous Mappings

Hakeem A Othman1,2*

Abstracts: The aim of this paper is to introduce some new weaker forms of fuzzy sp continuity, namely fuzzy almost sp-continuous mappings; fuzzy weakly sp-continuous mappings and fuzzy faintly sp-continuous mappings by using the notion of fuzzy sp-open sets. Certain fundamental properties, some new results related to these new concepts are obtained, fuzzy sp-compact is introduced and the relations and inverse relations between these new fuzzy mappings are investigated.

158

Page 2: Some Weaker Forms of Fuzzy SP-continuous Mappings (2)

Inventi Impact: Fuzzy System Vol. 2012, Issue 3 [ISSN 2277-2316]

2012 efs 025, CCC: $10 © Inventi Journals (P) Ltd Published on Web 15/07/2012, www.inventi.in

RESEARCH ARTICLE

(iii) ⇒ (IV). Let µ be any fuzzy open set of Y. By Theorem (2. 3) we have f −1 (µ) ≤ sp − Int (f −1 (clµ)) ≤ cl Int (f −1 (cl (µ))) ∨ Int (cl (f−1 (clµ))). (iv) ⇒ (ii). Let p be any fuzzy singleton of X and µ any fuzzy open set of Y containing f(x).Then p ∈ cl Int (f −1(cl (µ))) ∨ Int cl (f −1(cl µ)). (iii) ⇒ (i). Let µ be any neighbourhood of f (x) then p ∈ f −1 (µ) ≤ sp − Int (f−1 (cl (µ)). Put λ = sp − Int (f −1 (cl (µ)) then λ ⊆ F SP − O(X) and f (λ) ≤ cl (µ). This shows that f is weakly sp-continuous mapping at all fuzzy singletons p ∈ X. Definition 3.3 A mapping f: (X, τ ) → (Y, σ) is said to be fuzzy almost sp-continuous if for each fuzzy singleton p ∈ X and each fuzzy open set µ of Y containing f (p), there exists λ ⊆ F SP − O(X) containing p such that f (λ) ≤ Int cl (µ). Remark 3.4 Every fuzzy weakly continuous is fuzzy weakly sp - continuous. Fuzzy weakly continuous is implied by fuzzy sp-continuous and fuzzy almost sp-continuous is implied by fuzzy sp-continuous and implies weakly sp-continuous.

By using the same technique as in the proof of Theorem (3. 2), Definition (3. 3) and Remark (3. 4), we can prove the following theorems. Theorem 3.5 For a mapping f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ), the following statements are equivalent: f is a fuzzy almost sp-continuous at fuzzy singleton p ∈ X; A fuzzy singleton p ∈ cl Int (f −1(scl (µ))) ∨ Int cl (f −1(scl

µ)) for each fuzzy neighbourhood µ of f (p); f −1(µ) ≤ sp − Int (f −1(scl µ)) for every fuzzy open set µ of Y ; f −1(µ) ≤ cl Int (f −1(scl(µ))) ∨ Int (cl (f−1(scl µ))) for every

fuzzy open set µ of Y . Theorem 3.6 For a mapping f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ), the following statements are equivalent: f is a fuzzy almost sp-continuous; f −1(µ) ⊆ SP − O(X) for every fuzzy regular open µ of Y; f −1(u) ⊆ SP − C(X) for every fuzzy regular closed u of Y; f (sp – cl (λ)) ≤ clδ f (λ) for every subset λ of X; f−1 (u) ⊆ SP − C(X) for every fuzzy δ-closed u of Y; f −1(µ) ⊆ SP − O(X) for every fuzzy δ-open µ of Y . Theorem 3.7 For a mapping f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ), the following statements are equivalent: f : (X, τ ) → (Y, σ) is a fuzzy almost sp-continuous; f : (X, τ ) → (Y, σs) is a fuzzy sp-continuous; f : (X, τ sp) → (Y, σ) is a fuzzy almost continuous; f: (X, τ sp) → (Y, σs) is a fuzzy continuous. where τ sp and σs denote the family of all fuzzy sp-open sets of (X, τ) and family of all regular open sets of (Y, σ) respectively. Definition 3.8 A mapping f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ) is said to be fuzzy almost sp- open if f (λ) ≤ Intcl (f (λ)) for every fuzzy sp-open set λ of X.

Theorem 3.9 If f: (X, τ) → (Y, σ) is fuzzy almost sp-open and fuzzy weakly sp-continuous mapping, then f is almost sp-continuous mapping. Proof: Let fuzzy singleton p belong to X and let µ be a fuzzy open set of Y containing f (p). Since f is a fuzzy weakly sp-continuous mapping, there exists λ ⊆ SP −O(X) such that f (λ) ≤ cl (µ). Since f is a fuzzy almost sp-open mapping, f (λ) ≤ Int cl (f (λ)) ≤ Int cl λ and hence f is an almost sp-continuous mapping. Theorem 3.10 If f :( X, τ) → (Y, σ) is fuzzy weakly sp-continuous and g: (Y, σ) → (Z, θ) is fuzzy continuous, then the composition g o f: (X, τ) → (Z, θ) is fuzzy weakly sp-continuous. Proof: Let µ be a fuzzy open set of Z containing g (f (x)). Then g−1 (µ) is a fuzzy open set of Y containing f (x) and there exists λ ⊆ SP − O(X) such that F (λ) ≤ cl (g−1 (µ)), since g is fuzzy continuous. We obtain (g of) (λ) ≤ g (cl (g−1 (µ))) ≤ cl (µ). Definition 3.11 A mapping f : (X, τ ) → (Y, σ) is said to be fuzzy faintly sp-continuous if for each fuzzy singleton p ∈ X and each fuzzy θ-open set µ of Y containing f (p), there exists λ ⊆ F SP − O(X) containing p such that f (λ) ≤ cl (µ).

By using the definitions (2.4), (3.1), (3.3) and (3.11) we can prove this theorem. Theorem 3.12 The implication (i) ⇒ (ii) ⇒ (iii) ⇒ (iv) ⇒ (v) holds for the following properties of a fuzzy mapping f: X → Y. f is sp-continuous; f −1( clδ (µ)) is fuzzy sp-closed in X for every fuzzy subset

µ of Y ; f is almost sp-continuous; f is weakly sp-continuous; f is faintly sp-continuous; Definition 3.13 [2] A fuzzy topological space (X, τ) is almost compact iff every open cover of X has a finite sub collection whose closures cover X.

Now, the new concept fuzzy sp-compact space is introduced. Definition 3.14 A fuzzy topological space (X, τ) is sp-compact iff every sp-open cover of X has a finite subcover. Theorem 3.15 If f: X→ Y is a fuzzy weakly sp-continuous surjective mapping and X is a fuzzy sp-compact, then Y is a fuzzy almost compact space. Proof: Let {µi: i ∈ J} be a cover of Y by fuzzy open sets of Y . For each fuzzy singleton x ∈ X, there exists i(x) ∈ J such that

159

Page 3: Some Weaker Forms of Fuzzy SP-continuous Mappings (2)

Inventi Impact: Fuzzy System Vol. 2012, Issue 3 [ISSN 2277-2316]

2012 efs 025, CCC: $10 © Inventi Journals (P) Ltd Published on Web 15/07/2012, www.inventi.in

RESEARCH ARTICLE

f (x) ∈ µi(x). Since f is fuzzy weakly sp-continuous, there exists a fuzzy sp-open set λx of X containing x such that f (λx) ≤ cl (µi(x)). The family {λx: x ∈ X} is a fuzzy sp-open cover of X by fuzzy sp-open sets of X and hence there exists a finite subset Xo of X such that X ≤ ∨x∈Xo λx. Therefore, we obtain Y = f(X) ≤ ∨x∈Xo cl (µi(x)). This show that Y is fuzzy almost compact. Definition 3.16 [4] A fuzzy set v in a fuzzy topological space (X, τ) is said to be fuzzy sp-connected if and only if µ cannot be expressed as the Union of two fuzzy sp-separated sets.

By using the definition of fuzzy sp-connectedness, we obtain the following. Theorem 3.17 Let f: X → Y be a fuzzy weakly sp- continuous surjective mapping and X is fuzzy sp-connected then Y is fuzzy connected. Proof: Suppose that Y is not connected. There exists nonempty fuzzy open sets µ and λ of Y such that µ ∨ λ = Y and µ ∧ λ = 0x. Then µ and λ are clopen in Y. By Theorem (3. 2) we have f −1 (µ) ≤ sp− Int (f −1 (clµ)) = sp − Int (f −1 (µ)) and hence f −1 (µ) is fuzzy sp-open in X. Similarly f −1 (λ) is fuzzy sp-open in X. Moreover we have f−1 (µ) ∧ f−1 (λ) =0x, f−1 (µ) ∨ f−1 (λ =X and f−1 (µ) and f−1 (λ) are nonempty. Therefore X is not fuzzy sp-connected. Theorem 3.18 If f: X → Y is a fuzzy faintly sp-continuous surjective mapping and X is a fuzzy sp-compact, then Y is a fuzzy θ compact space. Proof: Let {µj: j ∈ I} be the fuzzy θ-open cover of Y . Since f is fuzzy faintly sp-continuous. {f −1{µj : j ∈ I}} is a collection of fuzzy sp-open sets in X. Since X is a fuzzy sp-compact, there exists a finite subset Io of I such that X ⊆ {∨j f−1 (µj): j ∈Io}. Then Y =f(X) ⊆ {µj: j ∈Io} this shows that Y is fuzzy θ compact.

In the next three theorems, we use the condition of fuzzy regular space to achieve the inverse relations of these mappings.

It is easy to prove that fuzzy sp-continuous mapping implies fuzzy almost sp-continuous mapping. Theorem 3.19 If Y is a fuzzy regular space, then a mapping f: X → Y is a fuzzy sp-continuous if and only if f is a fuzzy almost sp-continuous. Proof: Since Y is a fuzzy regular space, there exists a fuzzy open set G of f (p), such that f (p) ∈ cl G ≤ µ. Since f is a fuzzy

almost sp-continuous, for every fuzzy singleton p ∈ X and every µ ∈ N (f (p)), there exists a fuzzy sp-open λ, such that p ∈ λ and f (λ) ≤ Int cl G. Since clG ≤ µ and int cl G ≤ Intµ (µ is fuzzy open set). Therefore f (λ) ≤ µ, hence f is a fuzzy sp-continuous.

It is easy to prove that a fuzzy sp-continuous mapping implies a fuzzy weakly sp-continuous mapping. Theorem 3.20 If Y a fuzzy regular space, then a mapping f: X → Y is a fuzzy sp-continuous if and only if f is a fuzzy weakly sp-continuous. Proof: Since Y is a fuzzy regular space, there exists a fuzzy open set G of f (p), such that f (p) ∈ cl G ≤ µ. Since f is a fuzzy weakly sp-continuous, then for every fuzzy singleton p ∈ X and every µ ∈ N (f (p)), there exists a fuzzy sp-open λ, such that p ∈ λ and f (λ) ≤ cl G. Since cl G ≤ µ, f (λ) ≤ µ, hence f is a fuzzy sp-continuous. Theorem 3.21 If Y a fuzzy regular space, then a mapping f: X → Y is a fuzzy almost sp-continuous if and only if f is a fuzzy weakly sp continuous. Proof: The proof follows from Theorem (3. 19) and Theorem (3. 20). Corollary 3.22 If Y a fuzzy regular space, the following is equivalent for a mapping f: X → Y. f is fuzzy sp-continuous; f is fuzzy almost sp-continuous; f is fuzzy weakly sp-continuous.. REFERENCES AND NOTES 1. Azad, K. K., on fuzzy semi continuity, fuzzy almost continuity

and weakly continuity, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 82 (1981) 14-32. 2. Di Concilio, A. and Gerla, G. Almost compact in fuzzy topological

spaces, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 13(1984) 187- 192. 3. Ghanim, M. H. Kerre E. E. and Mashhour, A. S. Separation

Axioms, Sub- space and Sums in Fuzzy Topology, J. Math. Anal Appl, 102(1984) 189-202.

4. Othman, Hakeem A. On fuzzy sp-open sets, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Advances in Fuzzy Systems Volume 2011, Article ID 768028, 5 pages, doi:10.1155/2011/768028 .

5. Singal, M. and Prakash, K. N. Fuzzy preopen sets and fuzzy pre separation axioms, Bull. Call. Math. Soc., 78 (1986) 57 - 69.

Cite this article as: Hakeem A Othman. Some Weaker Forms of Fuzzy SP-continuous Mappings. Inventi Impact: Fuzzy System, 2012(3):158-160, 2012.

160