SOURCE: CATALOGUES, WEB SITES, ESTIF … · •working by minimum irradiation (cpc) kloben technology. kloben technology constant best optical efficieny. vacuum „sydney type“

PRODUCTS INTRODUCTION AND COMPARISON

SOURCE: CATALOGUES, WEB SITES, ESTIFwww.solarkeymark.org

www.solarenergy.ch(FOR INTERNAL USE)

VSVS..

VSVS..

VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“ KLOBENVACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“ KLOBEN OTHER VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“OTHER VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“

VACUUM „THERMOMAX TYPE“

VSVS..++++++++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..

VACUUM

VSVS..++++++++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..++ VSVS..

VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE““

TECHNOLOGIES COMPARISONS

FLAT PANELS

Insulation

Alluminium Frame

Protection Glass

FLAT PLATE


METAL PLATES TO PICKUP PROTECTED BY GLASS SURFACE

HIGH PERFORMANCE IN THEORETICALTERMS η0 BUT HIGH THERMAL LOSSES DUE TO THE BIG DISPERSAL SURFACE AND THE WORKING OF NOT ISOLATED "GREENHOUSE“ EFFECTS

FLAT PANELS

1. Cover profile

2. Frame3. Thermal insulation side

4. Cover5. Seal Profile

6. Absober

7. Thermal Insulation8. Back side

Elements list

1. Lower glass profile

2. Upper glass profile3. Rubber frame

4. Cover

5. Tubes6. Absober

7. Hydraulic connection8. Glass tube

9. Tile flange

10. Side thermal insulation11. Termal insulation

12. Frame

Elements list

1. Frame

2. Side thermal insulation 3. Seal

4. Cover

5. Absorber6. Thermal insulation

7. Back side

FLAT PLATE

•• GOOD PERFORMANCE BY GOOD PERFORMANCE BY OPTIMAL IRRADIATIONOPTIMAL IRRADIATION

•• OPTIMAL OPTICAL OPTIMAL OPTICAL

EFFICIENCY BY ORTOGONAL EFFICIENCY BY ORTOGONAL IRRADIATION TO THE IRRADIATION TO THE

COLLECTOR SURFACECOLLECTOR SURFACE

•• SENSITIVE TO OUTSIDE SENSITIVE TO OUTSIDE

TEMPERATURE TEMPERATURE

GENERAL CHARACTERISTICSGENERAL CHARACTERISTICS

ANGLE = 90ANGLE = 90°°



ALLUMINIUM

COPPER

PROTECTION GLASS




•• SINGLE GLASSSINGLE GLASS

•• VACUUMVACUUM OBTAINED BY

WELDING BETWEEN WELDING BETWEEN DIFFERENT MATERIALSDIFFERENT MATERIALS

•• OPTIMAL OPTICAL OPTIMAL OPTICAL EFFICIENCY BY EFFICIENCY BY

ORTOGONAL IRRADIATION ORTOGONAL IRRADIATION TO THE COLLECTOR TO THE COLLECTOR

SURFACE (THE ABSORBER SURFACE (THE ABSORBER

AREA IS A FLAT COPPER AREA IS A FLAT COPPER SELECTIVE SHEET)SELECTIVE SHEET)

ANGLE = 90ANGLE = 90°°

TECHNOLOGIES COMPARISONSTECHNOLOGIES COMPARISONS



VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“ KLOBEN

Outside Outside

GlassGlass

Inside Inside

GlassGlass

VacuumVacuum

Selective Selective

coatingcoating


VACUUM TUBE

BOROSILICATE GLASS (PIREX)

EXTERNAL GLASS THICKNESS 1,6mm

INTERNAL GLASS THICKNESS 1,2mm

VERY HIGH MECHANICAL

AND THERMAL RESISTANCE

INTERNAL PRESSURE 10-3 bar

SELECTIVE COATING “CERMET”

Ø 58 mm

Ø 47 mm


MANIFOLDØ 18 mm

GLASS

COPPER CIRCUIT

ALLUMINIUM FRAME

KLOBEN TECHNOLOGY

SEALING

COPPER CIRCUIT

VACUUM

KLOBEN TECHNOLOGY

ALLUMINIUM ABSORBER

VACUUM

COPPER CIRCUIT

CPC CPC –– COMPOUND PARABOLIC CONCENTRATORCOMPOUND PARABOLIC CONCENTRATOR

BEST EXPLOITATION OF DIFFUSE IRRADIATIONBEST EXPLOITATION OF DIFFUSE IRRADIATION

KLOBEN TECHNOLOGY

VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“ KLOBEN


• “GLASS TO GLASS” WELDING (NO VACUUM LOSSES)

• PROTECTED HIGH PERFORMANCE SELECTIVE COATING(CERMET)

• LOW THERMAL LOSSES

• PROOFED IMPACT RESISTANCE

• CONSTANT BEST OPTICAL EFFICIENCY

•WORKING BY MINIMUM IRRADIATION (CPC)

KLOBEN TECHNOLOGY

KLOBEN TECHNOLOGY

CONSTANT BEST OPTICAL EFFICIENYCONSTANT BEST OPTICAL EFFICIENY

FLAT PLATE SCHUCOSOL DG**FLAT PLATE SCHUCOSOL DG**VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“ KLOBEN VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“ KLOBEN SKY*SKY*

VSVS..

* Test Report ITW 07COL623* Test Report ITW 07COL623 ** Test Report ISFH 27** Test Report ISFH 27--07/D , 4407/D , 44--07/Q07/Q

EFFICIENCIES COMPARISON

IRRADIANCE = 800 W / mIRRADIANCE = 800 W / m22




VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“ KLOBEN VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“ KLOBEN SKY*SKY*

* Test Report ITW 07COL623* Test Report ITW 07COL623

VSVS..

VACUUM „THERMOMAX TYPE“ VACUUM „THERMOMAX TYPE“ MAZDON 20 TMA600S**MAZDON 20 TMA600S**

** Rest Report SPF C 601** Rest Report SPF C 601






COLLECTOR’S AREAS

Absorber area

Aperture area

Gross Area

Aperture areaAbsorber area Gross Area

FLAT PLATEFLAT PLATE

COLLECTOR’S AREAS

Absorber area

Aperture area

Gross Area

Aperture areaAbsorber area Gross Area

VACUUM SYDNEY TIPEVACUUM SYDNEY TIPE

KLOBEN GROSS AREA

KLOBEN APERTURE’S AREA

COLLECTOR’S AREAS

VACUUM “THERMOMAX TYPE”VACUUM “THERMOMAX TYPE”

Gross Area

COLLECTOR’S AREAS

“Aperture area collector efficiency

represents the percentage of

sunlight converted to heat”.

Aperture area

Thermomax (*)

(Mazdon 20–TMA 600S)

Kloben (**)

(SKY 18)

COLLECTOR GROSS

AREA3,202 m2 3,22 m2

COLLECTOR APERTURE

AREA2,135 m2 2,84 m2

ENERGY GAIN

593

kWh/(m2 Year)

733

kWh/(m2 Year)

ENERGY GAIN(PRO COLLECTOR)

1266

kWh/Year

2082

kWh/Year

ENERGY COMPARISON

Viessmann Paradigma GREENone TEc

(Sonnenkraft,

Riello, Rehau,

Thermital0)

KT Solar

(Kloben)

SKY CPC 58

η0

[%]

80,9 % 71,6% 77,2% 71,8 %

a1

[W/m2 K]

4,03 3,87 3,77 0,974

a2

[W/m2 K2]

0,0071 0,0069 0,064 0,005

kWh/m2 anno 517 417 492 733

FLAT PANEL VS SKY CPC 58

Viessmann Paradigma GREENone TEc

(Sonnenkraft,

Riello, Rehau,

Thermital0)

KT Solar

(Kloben)

SKY CPC 58

kWh/m2 anno 517 417 492 733

ENERGY GAIN

COMPARASION FLAT PANEL WITH SKY CPC 58

Manufacturer Name Photo EN 12975

ηηηηo, a1, a2

Wurzburg

kWh/m2 year

KLOBEN

(%)

Agena SA énergies

Agena Azur 6 0.833

3,63

0,014

500 +46,6

Avant Gard

Terni

TECsol SR 020

0,741

2,32

0,0261

474 +54,6

Buderus Logasol SKS 3 0,818

4,17

0,0082

519 +41,2

Chromagen Chromagen CC AF CR120

0,81

4,13

0,0148

481 +52,4

Foxsolar

Bolzano

FXS-C2 0,723

3,95

0,0067

427 +71,7

Gasokol TOPSOL-S 0,775

3,85

0,01

489 +49,9

FLAT PANEL


ηηηηo, a1, a2

Wurzburg

kWh/m2 year

KLOBEN

(%)

Idaltermo

Lecce

Venere PC200 0,77

6,36

0,0131

353 +107,6

Paradigma

Darzo

EasySun 0,716

3,87

0,0069

417 +75,8

ROTEX V21A 0,779

3,93

0,0081

488 +50,2

SolarPur SPQ 600 0,778

3,59

0,0096

498 +47,2

GreenOneTechSONNENKRAFT RIELLO

REHAU RDZ FERROLI

THERMITAL LAMBORGHINI

SK500 0,772

3,77

0,0064

492 +49,0

Sunerg SolarAR5ST6N

H1T 0,762

3,84

0,008

448 +63,6

FLAT PANEL


ηηηηo, a1, a2

Wurzburg

kWh/m2 year

KLOBEN

(%)

H. Lenz AG Solar

Multisol M210 NO N.D. +??

Sile Spa

Casier

RT 0,805

4,34

0,0023

511 +43,4

Solarsystems

San Daniele

300 I RS2 0,764

3,99

0,0089

451 +62,5

Solartecnica

Bizzarone

Sol-Tec A 0,761

3,71

0,0072

485 +51,1

Viessmann Vitosol 100 DI 0,809

4,03

0,0071

517 +41,8

Elco Italia

Treviso

Solatron A 2.3 Verticale

0,809

3,312

0,0181

N.D. +??

FLAT PANEL

VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“ KLOBEN VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“ KLOBEN SKY*SKY*

* Test Report ITW 07COL623* Test Report ITW 07COL623

OTHER VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“**OTHER VACUUM „SYDNEY TYPE“**

** G.O.T.:Test Report TZS ** G.O.T.:Test Report TZS 04COL34904COL349

** Ritter: Test Report TZS ** Ritter: Test Report TZS 06COL51306COL513


THERMOMAXVIESSMANN

GREEN ONE TECSONNENKRAFT RIELLO

REHAU RDZ FERROLI

THERMITAL LAMBORGHINI

RITTERPARADIGMA

KT SOLARKLOBEN

VACUUM TUBES SOLAR COLLECTORS

Thermomax

(Viessmann)

Ritter

(Paradigma)

GREENone TEc

(Sonnenkraft,

Riello, Rehau,

Thermital0)

KT Solar

(Kloben)

SKY CPC 58

η0

[%]

77,8 % 64,2 % 60,5 % 71,8 %

a1

[W/m2 K]

1,23 0,89 0,85 0,974

a2

[W/m2 K2]

0,0078 0,010 0,010 0,005

kWh/m2 anno 573 651 617 733

COMPARASION VACUUM TUBES SOLAR COLLECTORS WITH SKY

Thermomax

(Viessmann)

Ritter

(Paradigma)

GREENone TEc

(Sonnenkraft,

Riello, Rehau,

Thermital0)

KT Solar

(Kloben)

SKY CPC 58

kWh/m2 year 573 651 617 733

ENERGY GAIN

COMPARASION SOLAR COLLECTORS WITH SKY CPC


ηηηηo, a1, a2

Wurzburg

kWh/m2 year

KLOBEN

(%)

Augusta Solar

HEAT PIPE

AS 100 HP 0.744

1,3

0,0038

612 +19,8

Collectra

U TIPE

OPC 15H 0,779

1,63

0,0063

569 +28,8

Consolar

U TIPE

Consolar 11 cpc 0,655

1,26

N.D.

487 +50,5

Jacques Giordano

PIASTRA+U

Cortec 2 0,763

1,31

0,0111

598 +22,6

Schott

TUBOINTUBO +

SPECCHIO

Etc 16 0.773

1,09

0,0094

643 +14,0

RZ Solartechnik

PIASTRA+HP

DF 100-6 0,792

1,62

0,0021

661 +10,9



ηηηηo, a1, a2

Wurzburg

kWh/m2 year

KLOBEN

(%)

Vaillant

TUBOINTUBO +

SPECCHIO

VTK 550 0,773

1,09

0,0094

643 +14,0

ThermomaxELCO VIESSMANN

PIASTRA+HP

Mazdon 30

Auron

Vitosol

0,778

1,23

0,0078

573 +27,9

Thermomax

PIASTRA+HP

Solamax 30 TDS 300

0,75

1,25

0,0094

533 +37,5

Ritter

PARADIGMA

VTK 550

U TIPE

0,642

0,89

0,001

651 +12,6

GreenOneTecSONNENKRAFT

RIELLO REHAU RDZ FERROLI

THERMITAL

LAMBORGHINI

VK25

CSV 25

U TIPE

0,641

1,059

0,0046

617 +18,6

KT SOLARKLOBEN

U TIPE

SKY CPC 58 0,718

0,974

0,005

733


ONLY THE VACUUM T SOLAR COLLECTORS EXTEND THE WORKING SYSTEM TO THE WINTER SEASONOUTPUT PROCESSING MORE THAN 60%

ESTIF

SUMMER WINTER

KLOBEN SKY CPC 58

COMPARISON SOLAR COLLECTORS WITH SKY CPC

COMPARISON OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY CURVES OF SOLAR COLLECTOR

ENERGY COMPARISON

“The prediction is based on the calculation

of the yearly energy gain of the collector in

a reference solar hot water system. This

system is designed for a four-person-

household. The calculation is done for

aperture areas of 3 m² as well as for

reference climate data of Würzburg.”

“WUERZBURG TEST”“WUERZBURG TEST”

PREDICTION OF YEARLY ENERGY GAIN OF COLLECTORS IN A REF. SOLAR HOT WATER SYSTEM IN CENTER SWISS / GERMANY

ENERGY COMPARISON

ENERGY COMPARISON

• SOLAR AREAS

•WUERZBURG TEST

Documents

SOURCE: CATALOGUES, WEB SITES, ESTIF … · •working by minimum irradiation (cpc) kloben technology. kloben technology constant best optical efficieny. vacuum „sydney type“