65
UJFSAR Secltion 4.3

South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

UJFSAR

Secltion 4.3

Page 2: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

2

3

~

5

6

7

goo 8

9

10

II

12

13

~~

15

R P N M L K J H G FE 0 C 8 A

D FIRST CORE REGION I

Ill REGION 2

REG ION 3

180°

2700

00 3 Region Reload Core

ONCE OR TWICE BURNED FUEL

O~r.E OR TWICE BURNED FUEL

FRESH FUEL

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

FUEL LOADING ARRANGEMENT

Figure 4.3-1 Revision 0

Page 3: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

9

8 -~ ..... ::::E 7 -en ::..:: -en 6 ~ CL 0 ..... 0 en

5 a:: ~ ::r:: <.:J

~ ::r:: / 7 u.. 0

3 z: 0

..... I (.)

I ~ Q 2 0 a:: CL

0 0 8

0

-~

-:::1

-8 ..... :E -Cl ~

-12 en UJ CL 0 -- - ..... 0 ,, -16 en

...J , UJ

/ :::1 -20 u..

u.. 0 z:

-2~ 0 ..... CL :E :::1

-28 en z: 0

Pu2q1 ___.. (.)

-- ___.- -32 ~ ---_,.,. --12

-36 16 20 2~ 28 32 36 ~0

BURNUP (GWD /MTU)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION OF HIGHER ISOTOPES

Figure 4.3·2 Revision 0

Page 4: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

0 0

~------------------------------------~ 0

1-::) 0 Ul Q 0 a: 0:: w ~ a.. Ul z _J 0 _J Ul :::> .... l1... 0 a.. 1- w 0 J: _J

(0 •• <( w z 1- 0:: 0 ::) z (0

f-:::> 0 J: 1-.... ~

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ N N

(~dd) NOIJ.VCIJ.N3:JNO:J

L1J u z w a: w 11...::) 11...1-H::t 0'

~~ z 0::0 ::JO a:lOl

J-t 0 a.. w _J (0 <( z 0: ::) co I 1-..... .3=

0 0 0 0 tD .q-

0

.q.

0 0 a N

o-o=> at-o::t -ci ~ -0

Oa_ 0::) tOz

0: ::) (0

OUJ 0(!) 0<( ~a:

w > <( 0 OUJ 00:: ~0 u

0 0 0 N

0

NO~og lV:JIJ.ICi:J SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT

UNITS 1 & 2 BORON CONCENTRATION VERSUS FIRST CYCLE BURN-UP WITH AND WITHOUT

BURNABLE POISON RODS Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3·3 Revision 0

Page 5: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

2000 r------------------------------------------------

~ 1600 a. a. z 0 1-<( a: 1200 1-z w (.) z 0 (.)

z 0 800 a: 0 aJ ....I <( (.)

1-a: (.) 400

0 0

WITH BURNABLE ABSORBERS

1260 MWD/MTU DIFFERENCE

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 CORE AVERAGE BURNUP (MWD/MTU)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

BORON CONCENTRATION VERSUS FIRST CYCLE BURN-UP WITH AND WITHOUT

BURNABLE POISON RODS Unit 2 {Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-3 Revision 0

Page 6: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

~ ~ ~ ~~ 0~ 0 181o

~ ~ ~ ~ 181 181 0 ~ 0 181 181 ~ ~ 181 0 ~ ~ 0 181 181 ~ ~ 181 ~ 0 181 0 181

181181 181181 0 1810 .. 181 181 0

2~ BP'S 12 BP'S CORE CENTER

181181 181 ~0 ~0 0 0181 181 D 181 0 D D 0 181 0 0 181 181 0 0 D ~ ~ 0 181 0 D 0 D D 0 181 0 0 Do 0 oo ~0 0 0181

9 BP'S 8 BP'S CORE CENTER t. CORE CENTER

~

0181 0 1810 ~D 0 Do I8J D D 0 I8J 0 0 181 0 0

0 0 0 0 D 181 D D

0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 D D Do D oD Do 0 oo

~ BP'S 3 BP'S

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

BURNABLE POISON ROD ARRANGEMENT WITHIN AN ASSEMBLY

Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-4 Revision 0

Page 7: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

~D o -o 181 181181 D ~181 D D 181 D D 181 D 181 D 181 D 181 181 D D 181 181 D D D 181 D D 181 D 181 0 181 181o D o181 181181 D 181181

8 BA"S 16 BA"S

181181 181 181181 181181 181 181181 181 D 181 D 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 D 181 D 181 181 181 181 181 181

181181 181 181181 181181 181 181181

20 SA'S 24 BA 'S

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

BURNABLE POISON ROO ARRANGEMENT WITHIN AN ASSEMBLY

Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-4 Revision 0

Page 8: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2

• • • • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • 16 IFBA ASSEM3LY 32 IFBA ASSEM3LY

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 48 IFBA ASSEM3LY 64 I FBA ASSEM3L Y

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

TYPICAL IFBA ROD ARRANGEMENTS WITHIN AN ASSEMBLY

FIGURE 4. 3-4A REVISION 4 e L0582.041

L

Page 9: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

19o• R p N M L K j H G F E D c B A

I I I I I I I 4 4 .4 I

9 24 IS 9 2 23 3 24 4 8 4 24 3 3

24 12 8 8 12 24 4

9 12 8 4S 8 8 12 9 -5

4 4 8 8 8 8 4 4 -6

24 8 8 12 8 8 24 --7 go• 4 8 8 12 12 8 8 4 --8 270°

24 8 8 12 8 8 24 --9

4 4 8 8 8 8 4 4 -10

9 12 8 8 4S 8 12 9 --II

24 12 8 8 12 24 12

3 24 4 8 4 24 3 13

9 24 IS 9 14 23 4 4 4 IS

NUMBER INDICATES NUMBER OF BURNABLE POISON RODS 946 BP RODS S-INDICATES SOURCE ROD 12.5 W/0 ~03

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

BURNABLE POISON LOADING PATTERN Unit 1 {Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-5 Revision 0

Page 10: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

180° R p N M L K J H G F E 0 c 8 A

I I I I I I I 1

64 64 64 64 64 64 64 2 64 64 3 4S

64 80 80 64 4 64 80 64 80 64 80 64 -5 64 64 80 80 64 64 -6 64 80 80 80 64 -7

90° 64 80 80 80 80 64 -8 270° 64 80 80 80 64 -9 64 64 80 80 64 64 -10 64 80 64 80 64 80 64 -11

64 80 80 64 12 64 64 13 4S

64 64 64 64 64 64 64 14

15

00

D X - NUM3ER I NO I CATES NUM3ER OF S - BURNABLE PO I SeN RCDS

4736 INTEGRAL FUEL BURNABLE ABSORBERS

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

TYPICAL BURNABLE POISON LOADING PATTERN (SHEET 2 OF 2>

F I GURE 4. 3- 5 REVISION 4

L e L0584.041

Page 11: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

G.H I

G F E D C B A I

G. -1- • 92 _..,.f-8

- t- q_

9

10

II

12

13

I~

15

....___........~-~ GDDDDDD "'---+--'~-~~ B EJD D D D D "'---+--'~-:9 B QEJ D D D D :::l:::t:.~:::: B EJ EJ B D D '---~ ........... ~ 2 G BG 0 EJ D .___·+---'

87 G GB G G ........... ·~-3 .... G G G CALCUUTED ~.: 1.~1

KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE P~ER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,

UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER, NO XENON

Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2) Figure 4.3-6 Revision 0

Page 12: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

I I

-t-1.068- -I

- - - 1- - r- - r - - r-

'---+--'0.~4 BOD DODD ,---t----,1 ·0~3 EJ BD D D D D '---+--'1 -~6 BBB D D D D

1 -1 ~2 BEJBBDD ~1 .:t0~=3~ 8 EJ 8 B BD L-1-.0-+~-7 ..... 1 0.9931 B B EJ B L-0-.8-'-+. ~-9-' 1 0.86911 0.850 11 0.6491

I

CALCULATED F~H= 1.359 KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER

014'?

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,

UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER, NO XENON

Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2) Figure 4.3-6 Revision 0

Page 13: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

~ ,H G F E 0 C B A I

G.. ~ I .00 - r- - r-t- - t- -1- f- - r- - ~

8

9 I. II

10

II

12

13

IS CALCULATED FH = I .37 LlH

KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,

UNRODOED CORE, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-7 Revision 0

Page 14: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

I I

-~1.102- foo

l

- f- --- - - - - --r- -

10~0 EJDDDDDD ~1 - 1~2 EJBDDDDD ....__...._....1 ·0~3 BBBDDDD

1.1:9 BBI0·9791BDD

:::1=.o:::t~=5::::: B EJ B I 0.9921 B D ::1=.o:4~=5 ::: 8 8 B 8 B -0-.8-+~-8-B B 1 0.640 1

I

CALCULATED F~H= 1.344

KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,

UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-7 Revision 0

Page 15: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

Ci.H I

G F E 0 c B A I

<i. ~ • 82 - ~ - - - <i. 8

9

10

II

12

13

I~

IS

---.--1.~ BDDDDDD ~1.~ EJBDDDDD

I.~? BBEJDDDD =~.:2 [;Jc;J~QDD ::::'4:· :a=:[;][;] G Q G D ...._·...,__

9:

1 BGBGG '---+.8-S~GGG CALCULATED Fl" = 1.~1

I

<i. KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE PatiER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,

GROUP D 40% INSERTED, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON

Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2} Figure 4.3·8 Revision 0

Page 16: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

I I

-t-0.975- t-

I

- - --r- -r-- - t- - - 1-

o.9~ BDDDDDD :::=+=:::

1·1:12 BBDDDDD

'-+-----11 ·0~9 BBBDDDD 1 · 1 ~2 BBBBDD

:=1.41~=2~ B 8 81 0.9381 B D ..__1.-+1~-4 ..... B 8 8 EJ EJ ..__0.-+~-1 _, EJ 1 0.86911 0.6471

I

CALCULATED Fb.H= 1.343

KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR BEGINNING OF LIFE,

GROUP D 40% INSERTED, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON

Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2) Figure 4.3-8 Revision 0

Page 17: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

~ 8

9

10

II

12

13

I~

15

<L I H G F E D c B A I

·1- I .06 - f-f- . 1- 1- -1- 1- - ~ 1-

1.~ 8 BDDDDDD =~.~8 BBDDDDD =~·~3 BBBDDDD &......-~.~+--' [;] [;] [;] [;] D D &.....-l.+--'

1•5 BBGGEJD

....._·+---18:9 BGB GG

'---+.7-9 .... GGG CALCULATED~"= 1.30

KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR MIDDLE OF LIFE, UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER,

EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3·9 Revision 0

Page 18: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

I I

-"-1.187- ~

I

- ~ - - t-

I

1.216 BDDDDDD :=:t::::!1.1~0 B B D D D D D ~1.1~5 BBBDDDD L..-1 .-+1 ~-4-~ B B B B D D L..-1.-+1:_2-~ B B B I 0.9951 B D L-0-.9-+~-5.., EJ 1 0.94811 0.970 18 EJ '---0.--+7~-4_.. EJ EJ 1 0.5381

I

CALCULATED Fb.H= 1.308

KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR MIDDLE OF LIFE, UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER,

EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-9 Revision 0

Page 19: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

<t_ H G F E 0 c B A I I

t 1- .99-1- ..... - ..... - 1-8

9

10

II

12

13

I~

15

I

~~.:~ GDDDDDD '---+---'·~ EJ EJ D D D D D ~~.:3 BBEJDDDD '---~·~,.___,~ B B CJ B D D '---1 .,.___,1~~ B BEJ EJ EJ D

.95 c;JGc;JGJG ..._ .... ·a_s....., G G G CALCULATED F~" = 1.2a

KEY: VA~UE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR END OF LIFE,

UNRODDED CORE. HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-10 Revision 0

Page 20: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

I I

-~1.090- ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - 1- - ~ - ~ - 1-

'---+--11 · 1 ~ 1 BDDDDDD loo.--+---J1 ·0~5 EJBDDDDD

1 - 1 ~0 BBBDDDD ~14· 1 ~0:::::: B B B B D D ::::1.:41~=0:::: 8 B B B I 0.9561 D __ 0.-+9~-5 ...... B 1 0.96811 0.99518 B .... 0-.7-+~-7 .... B 1 0.72411 0.5621

I

CALCULATED F b. H= 1.239 KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR END OF LIFE,

UNRODDED CORE, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3·10 Revision 0

Page 21: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

~ H I

G F E 0 c B A I

({_ - . 82 - - --1- - 1- -I-- - 1-

8

9

10

II

12

13

14

15

....____.__~.~ GDDDDDD

....____.__~.~ [;] [;]0 D DD D

....____.__~.;s BBBDDDD

....____.__~.~ B [;] [;] Q D D __ '·..,.__.·

19 BBGGBD __ ·..,.__.

9 L

9 B Q [;] Q G --+·~-8-G G G CALCULATED F~. = I ,3q

KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR END OF LIFE,

HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON, GROUP D 40% INSERTED

Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2) Figure 4.3-11 Revision 0

Page 22: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

I I --0.942- - - !- - - - - - f-

1 · 1 ~ 1 BDDDDDD ;::::+:::::::1 · 0~8 BBDDDDD ...____,.._._.1 · 1 ~9 8 8 B D D D D ...__

1·1

........_...3:

2 B 8 B EJ D D __ 1.-+1~-1 ..... BBBI0.9851BD ...__1._0+-4:_1 _. B 1 099311 0.99818 8 ..__o_.a+o:7___. 81 o.75o II 0.5731

I

CALCULATED F.6.H= 1.246 KEY: VALUE REPRESENTS ASSEMBLY RELATIVE POWER

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

NORMALIZED POWER DENSITY DISTRIBUTION NEAR END OF LIFE,

HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON, GROUP D 40% INSERTED

Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2) Figure 4.3-11 Revision 0

Page 23: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

~

1.02

.1 .. 02 .1.03!

1.02 1.0~ 1.08

1.02 1.06 '· 12 X 1.03 1.06 I, I'+ I, 17 1. to

1.03 1.10 ~ I. 17 I. 18 ~ 1.03 1.08 l• I~ I. I~ I. 16 I. 18 I. 17 -1.03 1.08 I. I~ I. I~ I. 16 I. 19 I. 17 I. 17

1.03 I. 10 ~ I. 16 I. 18 X I. 19 1.20 )( . 1.03 1.09 I. I~ I. I ij I. 16 I. 19 I. 17 I. 17 I. 20 I. 18

1.03 1.09 1. 15 I. 15 I. 16 I. 19 I. 17 1. 17 1.20 I. 18 I. 18

1.04 I. II X I. 18 I. 18 X I. 19 1. 19 )( I. 20 I. 20 [X 1.04 1.09 I. IS I. 18 I. 17 I. 19 1. 17 I. 17 I. 19 I. 17 I. 17 I. 20. I. 18

1.0~ 1.08 I. I~ X I. 18 I. 18 I. 16 I. 16 I. 18 '· 16 I. 16 I. 19 I, Jj [X 1.04 1.06 I. 10 I. I~ I. 16 X I. 16 I. 16 )( I. 16 I. 16 X I. 17 I. 15 I. II

1.04 1.05 1.07 1.08 I. 10 I. 12 I. 10 1. 10 I. 12 I. 10 I. II I. 12 I. I I 1.09 1.08 I. 07

1.0~ 1.0~ 1.0~ 1.0~ ~.OS 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.06 1.06 I. 06 I. 06 '· 061

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 &2

RODWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION IN A TYPICAL ASSEMBLY NEAR BEGINNING OF

LIFE, HOT FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON, UNRODDED CORE

Figure 4.3·12 Revision 0

Page 24: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

r---

0.98

0.98 0.99

0.98 1.00 1.03

0.99 1.02 1.07 ~ 1.00 1.03 1.09 I. II 1.09

1.01 1.06 ~ I. I I 1.11 ~ 1.00 1.0~ 1.08 1.07 1.08 I. 10 1.08

1.00 1.0~ 1.08 I. 07 1.08 I. I 0 1.08 1.'08

~ ~ ~ .

1.01 1.06 1.09 I. 10 I. 10 I. 10

1.00 I.Oq 1.08 I. 07 1.08 I. 10 I. 08 1.08 I. 10 1.08

1.00 1.0~ 1.08 1.07 I. 08 I. 10 I. 08 1.08 1.10 1.08 1.08

1.0 I 1.06 ~ I. II I. II ex: I. 10 1.10 [X 1.10 I. 10 [X 1.00 1.03 1.09 I. II 1.09 I. II 1.08 1.08 I. 10 1.08 1.08 1.11 1.09

0.99 1.02 1.07 ~ 1.11 1.11 1.07 1.07 1.09 1.07 1.07 I. II I. II ~ 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.07 1.09 ~ I. 08 1.08 [X 1.08 1.08 [X 1.09 1.07 1.03

0.98 0.99 1.00 1.02 I. 03 I. 06 1.0~ 1.oq 1.06 1.oq 1.0~ 1.06 1.03 1.02 1.00 0.98

0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.0 I 1.00 1.00 I. 0 I 1.00 1.00 1.01 I. 00 0.99 0.98 0.98 0. 981

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 &2

RODWISE POWER DISTRIBUTION IN A TYPICAL ASSEMBLY NEAR END OF LIFE, HOT

FULL POWER, EQUILIBRIUM XENON, UNRODDED CORE

Figure 4.3·13 Revision 0

Page 25: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

ex ~ 0 Q,.

2.0

I. 5

Q LLJ I . 0 N

...I < ~ 0 :z

.5

0 0 10 20 30

AO: +5.91

AO: -8.81

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PERCENT OF ACTIVE CORE HEIGHT FROM BOTTOM

LEGEND: P = POWER FRACTION D = FRACTURAL INSERTION OF

D BANK AO = AXIAL OFFSET

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

TYPICAL AXIAL POWER SHAPES OCCURRING AT START OF LIFE

Figure 4.3-14 Revision 0

Page 26: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

0::

~ CL

0

2.0~----------------------------------------------~

I. 5

POWER=.5 0=.55 A0=-26.03

POWER= I .0 D=. I A0=6.92 POWER=.S

0=.21 A0=+8.20

~ I .0 ..... _j < :::E 0:: 0 z

0.5

LEGEND: D=FRACTIONAL INSERTION OF 0 BLANK

AO=AXIAL OFFSET

0~---~----~--~----~--~----~--~----~--~---~ 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

PERCENT OF ACTIVE CORE HEIGHT FROM BOTTOM

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

TYPICAL AXIAL POWER SHAPES OCCURRING AT MIDDLE OF LIFE

Figure 4.3-15 Revision 0

--~-- ~--

Page 27: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

01::

~ 0 a.. Q

2.0

I. 5

~ 1.0 ...J < :::E 0::: 0 z:

.5

0 0

I 0,388-1 65

AO: -25.7

100 PERCENT OF ACTIVE CORE HEIGHT FROM BOTTOM

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

TYPICAL AXIAL POWER SHAPES OCCURRING AT END OF LIFE

Figure 4.3-16 Revision 0

Page 28: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

"" :z ~ CD

Q u.a (.::1 0 ~ 1-a::: u.a 1-> :z ~ u.a

(,) u.a ~ a::: ~ 0 Q (,) ~

I ' I I I

' I l

0

M3MOd 3AI1113M lVIXV

Ll)

0

"" :z ~ CD

Q

5 a::: ..... Q u.a > 0 :X u.a a:::

I I

I I

I

~ ....I CD :X "'"' en en ~

a::: "'"' :. 0 Q.

:. 0 ....I

....I ~ a::: 1-u.a :c = ~ Q. - LU a::: "'"' :c Q. LU

0::: 0 (.)

0

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

COMPARISON OF ASSEMBLY AXIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION WITH CORE AVERAGE AXIAL DISTRIBUTION D BANK SLIGHTLY INSERTED

Figure 4.3·11 Revision 0

Page 29: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

STPEGS UFSAR

FIGURE 4.3-18

Deleted

Revision 5

Page 30: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

STPEGS UFSAR

FIGURE 4.3-19

Deleted

Revision 5

Page 31: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

STPEGS UFSAR

FIGURE 4.3-20

Deleted

Revision 5

Page 32: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

~ ex UJ

~ Q.. . -I UJ 0::

X

N

o-1.4.. ~

:::E ~ >< ~

2.6

2.1J

2.2

2.0

I .8

I .6

I ,IJ

1.2

1.0 0 BOTTOM

2

2.50 • 01

2.50 . 71

2.3~ • 13 I

I .70 • I~ I

6 8 10 CORE HEIGHT (FT)

12 IIJ TOP

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

MAXIMUM FQ X RELATIVE POWER VERSUS AXIAL HEIGHT DURING NORMAL

OPERATION

Figure 4.3-21 Revision 0

Page 33: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

20

15

1-u.. -~ -0::: LU ~ a.. 10 0::: < LU z: ....J

::..:: < LU a..

5

0 -50 -IW

0 -~ '!i, 0

oa 0 0 0 00 8o0 ll 0 , 0 ° 0 0 0 ool

~ 'lt0o ~o 0

o \f 8 8 oo 0 0 & 00 0 0 0., 0 9 0:

0

l ·V.1t"·~.!. . 0 0

\ :,;o 0 \o rP o oc:,1, 0 ~ 0 0 ,pOo 0 oq,O:,/ 0 8 GO OOdJOO OQ)OO 8

0 r o0, o8o 0°~~ol t 0 0 o~ 0 8o

0 8o o oD ~o 9 o 0 oO'l)o Joo ao t9 0

o\ oo 9 0

?o'rP 0 0 oo q, Ooo

0

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 FLUX DIFFERENCE (6I)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

PEAK LINEAR POWER DURING CONTROL ROD MALFUNCTION OVERPOWER

TRANSIENTS Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3·22 Revision 0

Page 34: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

f ~ ~ -a: w 3:

20

15

~ 10 a: ~ z :::; ~ < w a..

5

0 -40 -30

..

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 FLUX Dl FFERENCE ( t::.l )

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

PEAK LINEAR POWER DURING CONTROL ROD MALFUNCTION OVERPOWER

TRANSIENTS Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-22 Revision 0

Page 35: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

20

0 0

15 1--00 0

' -I-u.. -~ -0:::: LIJ

~ 10 Q.. ~

0:::: <( LIJ z -_.J

::.0:: <( LIJ Q..

5 t--

0 I -50 -4-0

l -30

I I I I -20 -10 0 10 20 30

FLUX DIFFERENCE (6I)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

PEAK LINEAR POWER DURING BORATION/OILUTION OVERPOWER

TRANSIENTS Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-23 Revision 0

Page 36: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

-~ LL ......... ~ ~ -a: w ~ 0 0.. a: < w z -1 ::r:::: < w 0..

20 -----------------------------------------------,

15

10

5

0 -50

-40 -30

6 At,.a•6

116.6 6 ,r'

-20 10 0 10 20 30 FLUX DIFFERENCE (b. I)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

PEAK LINEAR POWER DURING BORATION/DILUTION OVERPOWER

TRANSIENTS Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-23 Revision 0

Page 37: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

R p N M L K J H G F E D c B A

1

2 0.759 o. 792 ~.3"

3 I. 2 17 I I. 22~ o. 6. -0.77~ I 4 I. 255 I

0.800 1.2~9 3.14 .. -o.5~ -- r----- - --- ···---

5 I. 229 I. 229 1.225 I. 218 -0.3"' -0.9.

6 I. 109 I. 077 l. 107 1.092 -0. 2"' I.~ t

7 1.202 I. 223 I. 170 1.256 -2. 7·- 2. 7 ~

8 0.523 I. 217 I. 221 I. 217 o. sqs 1.203 I. 233 I. 210

q.6'' I. 1·~. 1.0. -0.6 9

10

11 1.229 I. 229 I. 189 l. 220 -3. 3·rl -0.7 1

12

13 I. 217 ...--- CALCULATED I. 211 ,.___ MEASURED -o.s· ~DIFFERENCE

14

15

- PEAKING FACTORS Fz : I. 5

~H : I. 357 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT F" : 2.07 LOCATED AT UNITS 1 &2

Q M-8 SOUTH COMPARISON BETWEEN CALCULATED AND

MEASURED RELATIVE FUEL ASSEMBLY POWER DISTRIBUTION

Figure 4.3-24 Revision 0

Page 38: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

"' z: "' C) A. - ::1 .... .... .... .... - % "' e-a.:: z: e...,.o C) :.:.-u %~N .... ~ .... a.:: .n ...... -c C) Q) to')

u .naoc:~

N . . N C)

I I

II II - -"' u -c _, .... -c % u - -C) C) . 4 4

., ,... -II II

"' u ... _, .... -c % u -N N .... ....

N 0 . LEGEND:

M = MEASURED VALUE E = EXPECTED VALUE OR

CALCULATED VALUE AO = AXIAl. OFFSET

~ ,... II

~, ....

ao ID . . H~Ocl 3AilV13H

0 c.o

~

0 N

-"' Q

a.:: ef Q 0 ..., 0 N

• .... -ef . Q % z C) :z:: -ci

,_ 0 ::c .... Q <.::1 .... .... ao

u a.:: I.U ::1 ::c Q "' .... 4 I.U a: .... A. % ~

0

I <,)

0 0 ID

0 ::r N . .

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

COMPARISON OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED AXIAL SHAPE

Figure 4.3-25 Revision 0

Page 39: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

x REACTOR I 0 REACTOR L+ \l REACTOR 2 • REACTOR 5

0 e REACTOR 3 FQ

0

0 3.0

• 0

• • "V 2.5

"V \7)( o• • X 0 "V

0 • • X \7 X X • •o• • X ~X X • i'. \ X X ~ ~ 0 X

0 • 0 0 "V@_O. • 0 ~

oo • •• 8 ~Jtf

• ~;s 0 Olo

0 co. Q ~ •• 0~ X

1.5

-50 -~5 -ij() -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

INCORE AXIAL OFFSET (~)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

MEASURED VALUES OF FQ FOR FULL POWER ROD CONFIGURATIONS

Figure 4.3-26 Revision 0

Page 40: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

LL. 0 -:&: (,) Cl..

L.L. L.L. .....

1-~ -Q.. ~

I-z: I.I.J (,)

LL. 1.1.. I.I.J 0 (,)

I.I.J 01: ~ I-C( 01: I.I.J Cl.. :&: I.I.J I-01: I.I.J . ...J Cl.. Cl.. 0 0

-1.2

-I.~

-1.6

-1 .8

-2.0

-2.2

-2.~

-2.6 500 600 700 800 900 I 000 1100 1200

EFFECTIVE FUEL TEMPERATURE TEFF (°F}

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

DOPPLER TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT AT BOLAND EOL CYCLE 1 Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-27 Revision 0

Page 41: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

-1.2

G:' -1.4 0 ......... ~ 0 a.. -1-z w 0 u. u. w 0 0 w a: ::J

-1.6

-1.8

~ -2.0 a: w a. ~ ..... -... w .. ,_ 1- -2.2 a: w ...I a. a. 0 Q -2.4

-2.6 ___ _... ___ ~--..1...----.1----'-----'-----' 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

EFFECTIVE FUEL TEMPERATURE (°F)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

DOPPLER TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT AT BOLAND EOL CYCLE 1

Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3·27 Revision 0

Page 42: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

-6

-8

-10

-12

-I~

-16 0 20 ~0 60 80 100

POWER (PERCENT OF FULL POWER)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

DOPPLER ONLY POWER COEFFICIENT· BOL, EOL CYCLE 1

Unit 1 (Sneet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3·28 Revision 0

Page 43: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

-a: w ~ 0 CL ~ !Sl ~ (.)

-8

e:. -10 1-z w (.) u:: LL. w 0 (.) a: w ~ 0 CL -12 > -' z 0 a: w -' CL CL 0 c

-14 0 20 40 60 80 100

POWER LEVEL (PERCENT OF FULL POWER)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

DOPPLER ONLY POWER COEFFICIENT· BOL. EOL CYCLE 1

Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-28 Revision 0

Page 44: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

-% (..) 0.. -

Q.. ~ .....

(..) UJ u... UJ Q

ex: UJ

~ 0..

~ _. :z: 0 ex: UJ _. 0.. 0.. 0 0

0

-500

-1000

-1500 0 20 ~0 60 80 100

POWER LEVEL (PERCENT OF FULL POWER)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

DOPPLER ONLY POWER DEFECT· SOL, EOL CYCLE 1

Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-29 Revision 0

Page 45: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

0

-200

-~ (.) a.. 1-(.) -400 w LL. w 0 a: w :: -600 0 a.. > ...J z 0 a: -800 w ...J a.. a.. 0 0

-1000

-1200 0 ~ ~ 00 00 100

POWER LEVEL (PERCENT OF FULL POWER)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

DOPPLER ONLY POWER DEFECT· BOL. EOL CYCLE 1

Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3·29 Revision 0

Page 46: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

20

.. 10 0 -:E (..) Q.,

:::E 1-~ - 0 ()... ~

1-z: LIJ

(..) .. .. -10 LIJ 0 (..)

LIJ 0:: ;::) 1-C[ 0:: LIJ Q.,

~ -20 1-0:: 0 1-C[ Cl: LIJ c 0 :E -30

-IW 0 100 200 300 IWO 500 600

MODERATOR TEMPERATURE (°F)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

MOD ERA TOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT- BOL. CYCLE 1 NO RODS

Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-30 Revision 0

Page 47: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

-u.. 0 ........

20

~ 10 a.. 1-z w 0 u.. u.. w 0 0 0 w a: ::::> 1-<( a: ~ -10 ::! w 1-a: 0 1-<( a: w -20 0 0 ::!

~~===========================::~2000PPM

1000 PPM

500 PPM

0 PPM

-30 ~------._ ______ ._ ______ ~------~--------------_. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

MODERATOR TEMPERATURE (°F)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

MOD ERA TOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT· BOL, CYCLE 1 NO RODS

Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-30 Revision 0

Page 48: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

u.. 0 -::::E: (.) a.. -::::E 1-'C) -Cl. ta

1-:z LLJ (.)

u.. u.. LLJ 0 (.)

LLJ Clt:!

~ Clt:! LLJ a.. ~ 1-Clt:! 0 1-ct Clt:! LLJ Q

~

10 ~--------------------------------------------------~

0

-10

-20

-30

-ItO

-50 0 100

UNRODDED

200 300 ltOO 500 600 MODERATOR TEMPERATURE (°F)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

MOD ERA TOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT· EOL, CYCLE 1

Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-31 Revision 0

Page 49: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

10

-u.. 0 0 ........ ~ () a.. 1-z -10 w () u.. u.. w 0 -20 () w 0: ::> 1-<t: 0: -30 w a.. ~ w 1-0: 0 1-

-40 <t: 0: w 0 0 ~ -50

-60 0 100

UNRODDED

500 PPM

0 PPM

0 PPM

200 300 400 500 600

MODERATOR TEMPERATURE (°F)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT· EOL, CYCLE 1

Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-31 Revision 0

Page 50: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

u.. 0 -% (.) Q..

% I-

~ <l.. ~

1-:z LIJ

(.)

u.. u.. LIJ 0 (.)

LIJ 0::: ::::1 1-< 0::: LIJ Q..

Cfj 1-0::: 0 I-< 0::: LIJ 0 0 %

15

10

5

68°F 0

/ /

/~/ -5

/ .

/ / -10 /

/ /

/ /

-15 , /

-20

-25 ~----------------~~----------------~--------------------~--------------------~ 0 500 1000 1500 2000

SOLUBLE BORON CONCENTRATION (PPM)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT AS A FUNCTION OF BORON

CONCENTRATION- BOL, CYCLE 1, NO RODS Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-32 Revision 0

Page 51: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

10 tL ~ ~

~ 5 -1-z w (..) 0 u:: u. w 8 -5 w a: ::> ~ -10 a: w (l.

~ ~ -15 a: 0 1-~ -20 w 0 0 ~ -25

-30 ~----------~------------~----------_.----------~ 0 500 1 000 1500 2000

SOLUBLE BORON CONCENTRATION (PPM)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT AS A FUNCTION OF BORON

CONCENTRATION • BOL, CYCLE 1, NO RODS Unit 2 {Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-32 Revision 0

Page 52: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

-u.. 0 -::E u Q.. -.= f't) -Q. f't)

.... z: LI.J

u u.. u.. LI.J 0 u LI.J a:: ::::;, 1-c:[ a:: LI.J Q.. ::E LI.J 1-a:: 0 .... c:[ a:: LI.J 0 0 ::E

0

-5

-10

-15

-20

-25

-30

-35 0 5000 10.000 15,000

BURNUP (MWD/MTU)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

HOT FULL POWER MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT DURING

CYCLE 1 FOR THE CRITICAL BORON CONCENTRATION

Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2) Figure 4.3·33 Revision 0

Page 53: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

-LL 0 ......... ~ (.) a.. -1-z w (.) LL LL w 0 (.) w a: => 1-<( a: w a.. ~ w 1-a: 0 1-< a: w Cl 0 ~

-4

-8

-12

-16

-20

-24

-28

-32

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 0000 12000 14000 16000 BURNUP (MWD/MTU)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

HOT FULL POWER MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT DURING

CYCLE 1 FOR THE CRITICAL BORON CONCENTRATION

Unit 2 (Sheet 2 of 2) Figure 4.3-33 Revision 0

Page 54: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

·'

-8

-a:: LIJ

! -10 1--0..

I-:z LIJ (,.,) a:: LIJ 0.. - -12 ::::E r--(,.,) 0.. -0..

~ - SOL Q.. ~ -I~ 1--

I- ~ :z LIJ -(,.,) -u.. -16 t--u.. LIJ 0 (,.,)

a:: LIJ

! EOL 0.. -18 r--...J < ,........ 6 I-

-20 I I I I 0 20 ~0 60

\ 80 100

POWER LEVEL {PERCENT OF FULL POWER)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

TOTAL POWER COEFFICIENT BOL, EOL CYCLE 1

Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3·34 Revision 0

Page 55: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

-12

-a: w ~ 0 -14 a.. -:R. ~ ~ (.) a.. 1-z w (3 -16 u:: u. w 0 (.) a: w ~ 0 a.. -1 -18 <t 1-0 1-

-20 0

---------------------..... EOL ........... .......... .......... .......... .......... ..........

20 40 60 80 100

POWER LEVEL (PERCENT OF FULL POWER)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

TOTAL POWER COEFFICIENT BOL, EOL CYCLE 1

Unit 2 {Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-34 Revision 0

Page 56: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

0

-500

-3 ~

Q.. .. 1-(,) LIJ ~ LIJ -1000 Q

0:: LIJ

~ ~

-1 < b 1-

-1500

-2000 0 20 4-0 60 80 100

POWER LEVEL {PERCENT OF FULL POWER)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

TOTAL POWER DEFECT BOL, EOL CYCLE 1 Unit 1 (Sheet 1 of 2)

Figure 4.3-35 Revision 0

Page 57: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

0 ~--------------------------------------------~

-~ (,) a.. -..... (,) w u. w c

-500

a: -1000 w 3: 0 a.. ..J < ..... 0 .....

-1500

20 40 60 80 100

POWER LEVEL (PERCENT OF FULL POWER}

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

TOTAL POWER DEFECT BOL, EOL CYCLE 1 Unit 2 {Sheet 2 of 2)

Figure 4.3-35 Revision 0

Page 58: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

Revision 18

* The Unit 1 Cycle 20 core contains 56 RCCAs with no RCCA installed at core location D-6. Unit 1 has seven (7) rods for shutdown bank SA. The total number of rods for Unit 1 is twenty-seven (27) for the shutdown banks.

*

*

*

KISTLEMK
Text Box
*
Page 59: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

90

80

-70 :c (.) :z: - 60 ~ a..

:c 1- 50 o:::· 0 3: 0 0 0::: qo ...J ~ -1-:z: UJ 30 0::: UJ u... u... 0 20

10

0 180

INCHES WITHDRAWN

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

ACCIDENTAL SIMULTANEOUS WITHDRAWAL OF TWO CONTROL BANKS MOVING IN THE SAME PLANT (TYPICAL)

Figure 4.3-37 Revision 0

Page 60: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

N

0 - -I I

>< .... Q z:-

I - ::r >cn:r-,_ a:: 0 0 -::::. .. -' 0 0 0 a; :C I I .. -,_ "'

{1N3J~3d) 13S~~O 1VIXV

0 0

7 ~----------------------------~ SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT

UNITS 1 & 2

AXIAL OFFSET VERSUS TIME PWR CORE WITH A 12-FT HEIGHT AND 121 ASSEMBLIES

Figure 4.3-40 Revision 0

KISTLEMK
Text Box
KISTLEMK
Text Box
Page 61: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

10

~ 8 -:I' 1- 6 z: ....: a::

~ 0 ....: ~

I 2 N

1- 0 z: ....: a:: 0 ....: :::) - 2 Qo -UJ - ~ (.,) z: UJ a:: UJ

- 6 u.. u.. Q

1- - 8 -J

1-1- -10 z: ....: a:: 0 -12 ....: ~

-I~

-16 0

~ . '. . \ . \ STABILITY INDEX: -0.076 (HR. -I) • •• . ~ \ ;rc ... •

• • ' ,.. . ................. ... ~:~

RCC E-11

N~3 N~ I

~ 8 12 16 20 2~ 28 3 2 36 40 ~~ ~ 52 56 60 6 ~

HOURS AFTER WiTHDRAWAL OF RCC E-1 I

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

XV XENON TEST THERMOCOUPLE RESPONSE QUADRANT TILT DIFFERENCE

VERSUS TIME

Figure 4.3·41 Revision 0

Page 62: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

(wjd) 1~3~30 H31dd00 1Y~~31NI 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 0 0 8 0 8.8 ~ N 00 c.o ~ N N N N - - - - - 00 c.o I I I I I I I I I I

z 0 -1-

"" .,., z ... z a.. 0 :E: -0 ..... <..> "" .,., "" :z: ~ ..... z a.. -0 a::a :E: :z: -0 ..... --' <..> :E: "" 0 - -' 0:: :z: ex ::1 1- 0 ..... u :z: 0:: a.. -' 0 0 ~ "" u a::a ..... w

0 <J

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c.o l.l') ~ ('I) N

I I I I I

( d %/Wjd) 1N31 ~I ~~30~ .~31dd00

8 8 ~ N 0

I I

8 I I I 0

a>

I I I 0

I 00

I I I o 0 .......

0 0 -I

0 a:: L.&J c.o ~ a.. ..J ..J =>

0 .... l.l') .....

0 1-z L.&J (,)

0 a:: ~ ~ a..

0 ('I)

0 N

0

0

0

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

CALCULATED AND MEASURED DOPPLER DEFECT AND COEFFICIENTS AT BOL 'TWO-LOOP PLANT, 121 ASSEMBLIES, 12-FOOT

CORE

Figure 4.3-42 Revision 0

Page 63: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

1~00 r-------------------------------------------------~

1200

1000

800 [ a.

CD (,) 600

~00

200

CALCULATED

0 ~--------_.----~----~----------~--~----_.~--~ 0 2000 ~000 6000 8000 I 0000 I 2000 I ~000 16000 I 8000

BURHUP.(MWO/MTU)

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

COMPARISON OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED BORON CONCENTRATION FOR 2·LOOP PLANT, 121 ASSEMBLIES, 12-FOOT

CORE

Figure 4.3-43 Revision 0

Page 64: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

0 0 N I'--

8 <.0

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

COMPARISON OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED CaiN 2-LOOP PLANT 121

ASSEMBLIES, 12-FOOT CORE

Figure 4.3-44 Revision 0

Page 65: South Texas, Units 1 and 2, Revision 18 to Updated Final ... › docs › ML1620 › ML16207A675.pdf · no~og lv:jij.ici:j south texas project units 1 & 2 boron concentration versus

8

8 0 =r

8 0 C"")

0 0 0 N -0 0 0

8 8 § CJ)

§S" ~~

0

Q §~ .... ... .......~ c ....J ;:) ::I oz c..> 8~ ....J c \QeD c..>

§ Ll'l

0 0 0 ::t'

0 8 ('I)

8 0 N

§

0

8 8 8 8 0 ~ ('I) N

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT UNITS 1 & 2

COMPARISON OF CALCULATED AND MEASURED C8 IN 3·LOOP PLANT, 157

ASSEMBLIES, 12·FOOT CORE

Figure 4.3·45 Revision 0