1

Species Status Assessment

Class: Insecta

Family: Lycaenidae

Scientific Name: Callophrys henrici

Common Name: Henry’s elfin

Species synopsis:

The primary range of Henry’s elfin is coastal New England to Florida west to southern Iowa, much

of Texas, and barely into New Mexico. Populations also occur in the Great Lakes region and in

southern Canada, but the species seems to be absent from most parts of New England, New York,

and Pennsylvania, and in much of the Midwest (Butterflies and Moths of North America 2012)

The range in New York is not well understood. Henry's elfin has been found mainly in the Albany

area, but there are a few other records in the region stretching from Tompkins to Westchester

counties. Glassberg (1993) indicates there are no recent records from the New York City area. With

the habitat unknown and elfin collectors concentrating on the wrong habitats in the past, this

butterfly could be widely overlooked. Considering that Henry's elfin is widespread in other regions

occurring with evergreen hollies from Sandy Hook, New Jersey south into Florida, it is expected to

to occur with American holly (Ilex opaca) on Long Island. Similarly the species occurs widely in the

St. Lawrence region of Canada and should turn up in northern New York. Henry's elfin will probably

eventually become more widespread in New York, as it has in both Massachusetts and Ontario as

buckthorn (Rhamnus spp.) feeding strains spread (New York Natural Heritage Program 2011).

Tim McCabe recorded the species in the Albany Pine Bush in 2012 (SGCN Expert Meeting,

November 2013).

I. Status

a. Current and Legal Protected Status

i. Federal ____ _Not listed_______________________ Candidate? ___No_____

ii. New York _____Special Concern ______

b. Natural Heritage Program Rank

i. Global __________ G5_______ ____________________________

ii. New York _____ SH______________ Tracked by NYNHP? ____Yes_____

2

Other Rank:

None

Status Discussion:

The status of this species is poorly known in New York. There are former records from the Albany

Pine Bush from the late 1800s until the late 1970s, and one record from 1984, but there is little

chance that a population of this species is there now, especially since this is not a pine barrens

species and the actual location for the 1984 observation was not made in appropriate habitat. With

no additional records in such a commonly visited location, plus the fact that fires may impact the

species, it is considered historical at that site and therefore in the state. This species cannot

adequately be inventoried until the specific habitat requirements are identified for New York and it

is possible that populations may be found in northern New York and on Long Island in the future. If

this species is rediscovered in New York, SU would probably be appropriate (NYNHP 2011).

II. Abundance and Distribution Trends

a. North America

i. Abundance

_____ declining __X___increasing ______stable _____ unknown

ii. Distribution:

_____ declining __X___increasing ______stable _____ unknown

Time frame considered: _________________________________________________________

b. Regional

i. Abundance

_____ declining __X___increasing _____stable _____ unknown

ii. Distribution:

_____ declining __X___increasing _____stable _____ unknown

Regional Unit Considered:________Northeast______________________________________

Time Frame Considered: ______________________ _________________________________

3

c. Adjacent States and Provinces

CONNECTICUT Not Present ________ No data ________

i. Abundance

_____ declining _____increasing _____stable __X___unknown

ii. Distribution:

_____ declining _____increasing _____stable ___X__unknown

Time frame considered: ____________________________________________________________

Listing Status: __________ _ Special Concern ________ SGCN? ___Yes________

MASSACHUSETTS Not Present ________ No data ________

i. Abundance

_____ declining __X___increasing _____ stable _____unknown

ii. Distribution:

_____ declining __X___increasing _____ stable _____unknown

Time frame considered: _____________________________ ______________________________

Listing Status: _____ Not listed_________________________ SGCN? __No____

NEW JERSEY Not Present ________ No data ___X_____

i. Abundance

_____ declining _____increasing ___X__stable _____ unknown

ii. Distribution:

_____ declining _____increasing ___X__stable _____ unknown

Time frame considered: __________ _________________________________________________

Listing Status: __________ Not listed _______________________ SGCN? ____No_______

4

ONTARIO Not Present __________ No data ________

i. Abundance

_____ declining __X___increasing _______ stable _____unknown

ii. Distribution:

_____ declining __X___increasing _______ stable _____unknown

Time frame considered: ___________________________________________________________

Listing Status: __________________ _Not listed____________________________________

PENNSYLVANIA Not Present __________ No data ___X_____

i. Abundance

_____ declining _____increasing __X___stable _____ unknown

ii. Distribution:

_____ declining _____increasing __X___stable _____ unknown

Time frame considered: ___________________________ ________________________________

Listing Status: _______ Not listed ______________________ SGCN? ____No_______

QUEBEC Not Present __________ No data ___X_____

i. Abundance

_____ declining _____increasing ______stable __X___ unknown

ii. Distribution:

_____ declining _____increasing _______stable __X___ unknown

Time frame considered: ____________________ ________________________________________

Listing Status: _______ Not listed___________________________________________

VERMONT Not Present ____X____ No data _________

5

d. NEW YORK No data ________

i. Abundance

_____ declining _____increasing ___X__stable ______ unknown

ii. Distribution:

_____ declining _____increasing ___X__stable ______ unknown

Time frame considered: _______________________________________ _____________________

Monitoring in New York.

None

Trends Discussion:

Both short-term and long-term trends are unknown (New York Natural Heritage Program 2011).

6

Figure 1. Conservation status of Henry’s elfin in North America (NatureServe 2012).

Figure 2. Occurrence of Henry’s elfin in New York (New York Nature Explorer 2009).

7

III. New York Rarity, if known:

Historic # of Animals # of Locations % of State

prior to 1970 __________ __________ __________

prior to 1980 __________ __________ __________

prior to 1990 __________ ___1 site__ __________

Details of historic occurrence:

Albany County – 1989

Current # of Animals # of Locations % of State

__________ __________ __________

Details of current occurrence:

Tim McCabe recorded this species in the Albany Pine Bush, Albany County in 2012 (Expert

meeting).

New York’s Contribution to Species North American Range:

Distribution (percent of NY where species occurs) Abundance (within NY distribution)

_X__ 0-5% ___ abundant

____ 6-10% ___ common

____ 11-25% ___ fairly common

____ 26-50% ___ uncommon

____ >50% _X_ rare

NY’s Contribution to North American range

_X__ 0-5%

____ 6-10%

____ 11-25%

____ 26-50%

____ >50%

8

Classification of New York Range

_____ Core

__X__ Peripheral

____ Disjunct

Distance to core population:

_____________

IV. Primary Habitat or Community Type:

1. Pine barrens

Habitat or Community Type Trend in New York:

_____ Declining _____Stable _____ Increasing __ X___ Unknown

Time frame of decline/increase: __________________________________________________

Habitat Specialist? __?___ Yes _______ No

Indicator Species? ______ Yes ___X___ No

Habitat Discussion:

The habitat of Henry’s elfin is essentially unknown in New York, especially for older records or

where just a single individual has been observed or collected. Any observation that does not include

several adults may not be reflective of the true habitat. Notably some of the Albany Pine Bush

records, possibly all, are single individuals. In neighboring states, this species inhabits forests, but

the exact habitat depends on the food plant which varies regionally. Tall shrub areas around bogs,

or shrub swamps with Mountain Holly (Nemopanthus mucronatus) are potential habitat (NYNHP

2011).

9

V. New York Species Demographics and Life History

__X___ Breeder in New York

__X___ Summer Resident

__X___ Winter Resident

_____ Anadromous

_____ Non-breeder in New York

_____ Summer Resident

_____ Winter Resident

_____ Catadromous

_____ Migratory only

_____Unknown

Species Demographics and Life History Discussion:

Adults tend to perch one to several meters high on evergreen or recently expanded foliage. The

location of egg deposition on plants varies with the plant species. On American holly (Ilex opaca), an

egg is laid on the center of an old host leaf just before bud break, while on redbud (Cercis

canadensis), eggs are laid on flowers and buds. Caterpillars eat buds and young leaves, and pupate

in litter at the base of the host plant. Chrysalids overwinter (Butterflies and Moths 2012).

Where redbud is the caterpillar host, its flowers are the main nectar supply for adults. In other

places, flowers of plants that are not the caterpillar host are used for nectar including willows (Salix

spp.), wild plum (Prunus Americana) and hawthorn (Crataegus spp.), and swamp privet (Forestiera

spp. )(Butterflies and Moths 2012). The larval food plant in New York is not known. Blueberry

(Vaccinium spp.) is often reported but has never been documented. Species in the holly family

would be the most likely native food plants, but introduced buckthorns will probably eventually

become the main food plants. There is only one brood range- wide. The flight season is poorly

documented in New York, but is presumably most of May with a few stragglers into June, and

probably starts at the end of April in some years southward. The larvae mature within a month

unless the weather is still cold (NYNHP 2011).

10

VI. Threats:

Next to habitat loss, gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) spraying is a potential threat, but the severity

cannot be assessed. Prescribed burning is also a potential threat because the food plant is unknown,

which makes it impossible to design prescribed burns appropriately for this species, leaving

survival in locations such as the Albany Pine Bush largely to chance. Survival of pupae in the leaf

litter during fire is unlikely. It is also possible that lack of fire could threaten the habitat. Mosquito

and black fly spraying in wetlands could threaten bog or swamp populations of this species (NYNHP

2011).

Are there regulatory mechanisms that protect the species or its habitat in New York?

_______ No __X___ Unknown

______ Yes

Describe knowledge of management/conservation actions that are needed for

recovery/conservation, or to eliminate, minimize, or compensate for the identified threats:

The management needs are unknown at this time since food plant is unknown and the habitat

requirements are unclear in New York. It is known that the pupae reside in the leaf litter and are

vulnerable to fires (NYNHP 2011).

The primary research need is to learn the food plants and habitats in New York in order to

effectively inventory this species. Also if new populations are found they should be vouched with a

few actual specimens given the possibility of taxonomic issues, and likely food plants noted (NYNHP

2011).

11

Conservation actions following IUCN taxonomy are categorized in the table.

Conservation Actions

Action Category Action

Law and Policy Policies and Regulations

Education and Awareness Training

Education and Awareness Awareness & Communications

Land/Water Protection Site/Area Protection

Land/Water Protection Resource/Habitat Protection

Land/Water Management Site/Area Management

Land/Water Management Invasive/Problematic Species Control

Land/Water Protection Site/Area Protection

The Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (NYSDEC 2005) includes recommendations for the following actions for other butterflies, and for Henry’s elfin in particular. Fact sheet: ____ Develop fact sheets and other outreach material to educate the public about species at risk

Lepidoptera. Habitat management: ____ Determine best management regimes for species in each locality. Habitat research: ____ Determine precise habitat needs of all life stages. ____ Ascertain food plants. ____ Determine the relationship between food availability and species numbers. Invasive species control: ____ Identify species which impact negatively on butterfly populations. ____ Determine the best control method for those exotic species with minimal repercussions for

butterfly populations. Life history research: ____ Investigate the metapopulation dynamics of those species which appear to have distinct

populations. ____ Establish the duration of all life stages. ____ Taxonomic research for related species. Other action: ____ Determine the actual sensitivity of species to chemical formulations, particularly

diflubenzuron and other commonly used agricultural pesticides. ____ Determine the effect of Bacillus thuringiensis kurstaki (BTK) used in Gypsy moth sprayings

on various species. Population monitoring:

12

____ Inventory of species within historical range. Statewide baseline survey: ____ Survey all species to more adequately define the list of species that need to be addressed.

VII. References

Butterflies and Moths of North America. 2012. <http://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/>. Accessed 4

January 2013.

Catling, P.M, R.A. Layberry, J.P. Crolla, and P.W. Hall. 1998. Increase in populations of Henry's Elfin,

Callophrys henrici, (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Ottawa-Carleton, Ontario, associated with

man-made habitats and glossy buckthorn, Rhamnus frangula, thickets. Canadian Field-

Naturalist 112: 335-337.

Glassberg, J. 1993. Butterflies through binoculars: A field guide to butterflies in the Boston-New

York-Washington region. Oxford University Press: New York. 160 pp.

NatureServe. 2012. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version

7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. <http://www.natureserve.org/explorer>. Accessed

4 January2013.

New York Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP). 2011. Online Conservation Guide for Callophrys

henrici. < http://www.acris.nynhp.org/guide.php?id=7861>. Accessed 4 January 2013.

New York Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP). 2013. Element Occurrence Database. New York State

Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, NY.

Date last revised: ____________________11 February 2014 ___________________