Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
March 30th 2019
Spectrum and its application to 5G and the Power of Massive MIMO
Tajit Mehta
2
The jump from LTE to 5G will be like…
3
4
5
Existing networks & technology must evolve to handle the demands of the connected future
Between 2018 and 2022, the traffic generated by
smartphones will increase by 10 times
6
5G IS TRULY REVOLUTIONARY …& will satisfy customer demands 10X
5G will handle 10X connection density 10X
5G will deliver 10X experienced throughput
10XLower latency
100XIncreased area traffic
capacity
2G 3G 4G 5GSource: ITU, IMT-2020
7
5G3 Million
new US jobs(800K in construction)
$275 Billioninvestment
$500 Billioneconomic
growth
UNTOLD POTENTIAL
for innovation
Even more important – 5G can deliver a MASSIVE economic benefit
Source: CTIA
8
EM Intro video
ElectromagnegticSprectrum
Current Wave Magnetic Wave 7 Types of wave
Electric field to give a direction To give the field Radio wave
Microwave
Infrared
Visible
Ultraviolet
X-ray
Gamma
9
10
Spectrum Waves and Output
11
The Sweet Spot
Capacity Demands and Deployment
Coverage shown is for illustrative purposes only
Capacity need
LTE/LTE-Advanced
LTE-Advanced Pro/eLTE5G sub-6 GHz/mmWave Small cell
5G sub-6 GHz Macro
Map data: Google
13
Sample Intra-band breakouts
FCC Spectrum Allocation of Bands of Interest
750 - 950 MHz
2300 - 2700 MHz
Sam Wetsel
Nextel Spectrum Resources
2496
Current
Allocation
On Top
1900 - 2170 MHz
2320
2345
2360
2305
WCS
(Down)
WCS
(Up)
DARS
Aeronautical
Telemetry
Amateur
Radio
Cellular
A & B
(Uplink)
900 SMR (Up)
Amateur
Radio /
Radiolocation
Public
Safety
2 MHz
Guard
Band
5 MHz 3G
10 MHz 3G
Fixed
Microwave
800 SMR/
NPSPAC
(Uplink)
806
824
1 MHz
Guard
Band
782
776
777
Public
Safety
762
764
5 MHz 3G
10 MHz 3G
1 MHz
Guard
Band
752
747
792
794
849
851
Commercial
Aviation Air
Ground Systems
Cellular
A & B
(Downlink)
800 SMR/
NPSPAC
(Downlink)
869
894
902
901
896
929
928
Paging
Fixed Microwave
900 SMR (Down)
941
940
932
935
MAS Fixed
Microwave
Narrowband
PCS
2500
2506
2512
2518
2524
2530
2536
2542
2548
2554
2560
2566
ITFS D3
2572
2578
2584
2590
2596
2602
2608
2614
2620
2626
2632
2638
2644
2650
2656
2662
2668
2674
2680
2686
2690
Mobile – Satellite
(Downlink) /
Radiodetermination
Satellite
Big LEO paired
w/ 1610-1626.5
(Iridium &
Globalstar)
Lower Guard Band
ITFS C4
ITFS D4
ITFS C3
ITFS D1
ITFS C2
ITFS D2
ITFS C1
ITFS B3
ITFS A4
ITFS B4
ITFS A3
ITFS B1
ITFS A2
ITFS B2
ITFS A1
MMDS H3
ITFS G4
R Channel
ITFS G3
ITFS G2
ITFS G1
MMDS H2
MMDS H1
MMDS E1
MMDS F1
MMDS E2
MMDS F2
MMDS E3
MMDS F3
MMDS E4
MMDS F4
ITFS B4
ITFS C4
ITFS D4
ITFS A4
ITFS G4
ITFS F4
ITFS E4
K Guard
J Guard
MDS 2
BRS E1
BRS E2
BRS E3
BRS F1
BRS F2
BRS F3
BRS H1
BRS H2
BRS H3
ITFS G1
ITFS G2
ITFS G3
ITFS D1
ITFS D2
ITFS D3
ITFS C1
ITFS C2
ITFS C3
ITFS B1
ITFS B2
ITFS B3
ITFS A1
ITFS A2
ITFS A3
MDS 1
2495
2502
2507.5
2513
2518.5
2524
2529.5
2535
2540.5
2546
2551.5
2557
2562.5
2568
2572
2578
2584
2590
2596
2602
2608
2614
2618
2624
2629.5
2635
2640.5
2646
2651.5
2657
2662.5
2668
2673.5
2679
2684.5
2690
Fixed - Satellite /
Radio Astronomy /
Space Research
Re-Allocation
On Bottom
PCS
Block C
(Uplink)
PCS
Unlicensed
2150
Currently
MDS Ch. 1
1895
Async
(data)
Iso
(voice)
1910
1930
PCS Block D (Down)
PCS
Block B
(Down)
PCS
Block C
(Down)
PCS
Block A
(Down)
1945
PCS Block E (Down)
PCS Block F (Down)
1950
1975
1970
1965
1990
2110
2000
2025
2020
2162
2156
Reallocated To:
NTIA 3G Advanced Wireless
(Downlink)
PCS Block
G (Up)
PCS Block
H (Up)
PCS Block
G (Down)
PCS Block
H (Down)
(ICO / Iridium/
Celsat / Boeing)
MSS (Uplink)
NXTL White
Paper (Up)
Currently TV Aux Broadcast (BAS)/Cable TV
Relay/Local TV Transmission Channels 3-7
Fed: Space Operation/Earth Exploration Satellite/Space Research
Currently BAS
Channels 1 & 2
Reallocated TV Aux Broadcast (BAS)/Cable TV
Relay/Local TV Transmission Channels 1-7
Fed: Space Operation/Earth Exploration Satellite/Space Research
Currently
MDS Ch. 2
2155
To Be
Reallocated
Currently Public
Microwave
Currently
Public
Microwave
1995
2000
1915
1920
14
The Three Ps & a Bonus C
PowerPropagationPenetrationCapacity
Dense urbanMM wave
MetroMid-band
15
NationwideLow band
New T-Mobile
Multi band use requirements met by band not Single band to multi use
Multi Band Spectrum use
16
MU Mimo video
17
MU-MIMO and Beamforming
LTE
LTE+5G
LTE32T32R 5G NR
32T32R
Split Mode Massive MIMO Beamforming Multi-User MIMO Pairing
Vertically paired users
Horizontally paired users
The image part with relationship ID rId2 was not found in the file.
Massive MIMO Highlights
Higher Spectral Efficiency
5GKey building block of
Network
Better Coverage Better Capacity
Horizontal and Vertical Beamforming
19
Capacity 3x20 MHz LTE + 60 MHz 5G NR
Single Sector (Gbps) 3
3-Sector Site (Gbps) 9
8x Peak Sector Throughput
Avg. Sector Throughput
6x
3x Cell EdgeThroughput
Expected Capacity with LTE + 5G NR
7256 QAM, 8 MU-MIMO layers and 32T32R each for LTE and 5G NR
Massive MIMO PerformanceExpected 32T32R - Split Mode Performance over 8T8R
Air Interface EnhancementsCapacity - Massive MIMO Benefits
Multi-User MIMO increases spectral efficiency
8x NetworkCapacity
Ave. Sector Throughput
6x
4x Cell EdgeThroughput
4dB UL Coverage Gain
Expected 64T64R 16 Layer Performance over 8T8RMassive MIMO MacroLegacy Macro
Massive MIMO for 5G below 6 GHz, Emil Björnson, Linköping University
Horizontal and Vertical Beamforming
Spec
tral
Effi
cien
cy [b
it/s/
Hz]
1000
500
0
1000
500
0
8
6
4
2
0Position [m] Position [m]
Spec
tral
Effi
cien
cy [b
it/s/
Hz]
1000
500
0
1000
500
0
8
6
4
2
0Position [m] Position [m]
912
24
33
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
3x20 MHz LTE + 60 MHz 5G NR 3x20 MHz LTE + 100 MHz 5G NR 3x20 MHz LTE + 100 MHz 5G NR 180 MHz 5G NR
3-Se
ctor
Site
Thr
ough
put (
Gbps
)
LTE/NR Site Configuration
Near Term
Mid Term
Long Term
32T32R 32T32R
64T64R
64T64R
SPLIT MODE
8
Peak Site Capacity
22
• Interference• Cross purpose absorption • Ducting• Seasonal• UFO
• Edge of Network handoff• Network densification• Market expectation vs market opportunity
Challenges
23
Opportunities
24
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/thanks-nanoparticle-injections-these-mice-can-see-infrared-are-we-next/
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/thanks-nanoparticle-injections-these-mice-can-see-infrared-are-we-next/
25
Mouse Video
• https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-02/cp-nmi022019.php
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-02/cp-nmi022019.php
26
Appendix
Massive MIMO Antenna Arrays
- Conventional 8T8R Antenna:
- Each column uses 8-12 antenna elements to create a vertically fixed directional pattern.
- The 8 columns, each used with a single transceiver for signal transmission, are designed for horizontal beamforming only.
- 64T64R Massive MIMO Radio/Antenna:
- Has 64 transceiver units, each mapped to 2 antenna elements.- All 128 antenna elements create the antenna pattern, with array
design enabling both vertical and horizontal beamforming.- The addition of the vertical dimension, with per antenna element
adjustments, turns a column of antennas into an antenna array allowing many more layers and much finer adjustments.
- TDD is better than FDD due to channel reciprocity; with FDD, feedback overhead increases with antenna elements.
The image part with relationship ID rId2 was not found in the file.
Benefits of TDD in Massive MIMO
• TDD operates on the same frequency on DL and UL⇒ DL/UL channel reciprocity: The channel estimate of the UL at the Tx can be utilized for DL beamforming, thus less overhead
• FDD operates on different frequencies on DL and UL⇒ No DL/UL channel reciprocity: Two way pilots and feedback needed
Much higher overhead, which greatly limits the total number of allowable antennas in case of high mobility scenario when the coherence block τ is small.
• To ensure reliable channel feedback, the reference signal symbols should be sent within a coherence block (𝜏𝜏):
𝜏𝜏 = Channel coherent bandwidth x Channel coherent Time
• TDD requires 2𝐾𝐾 UL sounding signal symbols for channel estimation𝐾𝐾 < 𝜏𝜏/2
• FDD requires 2𝑀𝑀DL reference signal symbols and 2𝐾𝐾 UL reference signal symbols for channel estimation and feedback
𝑀𝑀 + 𝐾𝐾 < 𝜏𝜏/2
𝑀𝑀 is the total number of antennas at the eNB, 𝐾𝐾 is the total number of served UEs.
Source: Massive MIMO: Ten Myths and One Critical Question, Emil Bjornson, Erik G. Larsson, and Thomas L. Marzetta
FDD
TDD
(100,25)for τ= 200
Number of terminals (K)
τ2
τ2
τ2
τ2
Number of antennas (M)
Number of antennas (M)0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Overhead
29
Dallas
Chicago
Los Angeles
New York City
Washington, D.C.
Atlanta
Phoenix
Houston
Kansas City
NOW FOCUSED ON 9 MAJOR MARKETS
Air Interface EnhancementsCapacity - Massive MIMO and Beamforming
Massive MIMO for 5G below 6 GHz, Emil Björnson, Linköping University
UserSignal goes in alldirections
User
Substantial side-lobes Main
lobe
User
Narrow main lobeTiny side-lobes
Fully Digital Beamforming
Hybrid Beamforming
highly focused beams
Single User MIMO
co-scheduled on same time/frequency resourceMulti-User MIMO
Massive MIMO systems enable sharper beamforming and null-forming
>
Adapted from Ericsson
M- # of Tx
Small Cell Deployment ChallengesBackhaulSiting/Real Estate/Zoning & PermittingSheer # of sites needed
These remain as open challengesfor the Industry today for LTE small cells. 5G will onlyaccentuate the problem.
5G will NOT be successful if we cannot adequately address roadblocks to large-scale small cell deployments that exist today.
Large variability in local laws, landlord policies, and other site-specific factors result in cost distributions that limit small cell deployments today to the 1,000’s to 10,000’s, and will greatly inhibit the adoption of high-frequency 5G in the US, where 100,000+ units may be necessary per operator (depending on frequencies used, and other company-specific business and technical design criteria).
Large-scale small cell site deployment capital cost model provided courtesy of Nokia.
Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7EM Intro videoSlide Number 9Spectrum Waves and OutputThe Sweet Spot Capacity Demands and Deployment Sample Intra-band breakoutsThe Three Ps & a Bonus CSlide Number 15MU Mimo videoMU-MIMO and BeamformingMassive MIMO HighlightsSlide Number 19Air Interface Enhancements�Capacity - Massive MIMO BenefitsPeak Site CapacityChallengesOpportunities��Mouse VideoAppendixMassive MIMO Antenna ArraysBenefits of TDD in Massive MIMOSlide Number 29Air Interface Enhancements�Capacity - Massive MIMO and BeamformingSmall Cell Deployment Challenges