4
- Fallacies Paper - Due Dates: M/W Class: November 13, 2013 at the beginning of the class. Tuesday Night Class: November 19, 2013 at 7pm We began this class by finding logical errors within an argument through categorical syllogism and propositional logic. Most recently we have been analyzing arguments for informal fallacies. Remember, a fallacy is a defect in an argument that consists in something other than merely false premises. A fallacy involves a mistake in reasoning or an error. That is why critical thinking begins with the problem of error. This is what you will be doing for the fallacies paper. This section is pretty selfexplanatory, though it isn't easy. It is your turn to find fallacies in everyday life. You have already done some looking at ordinary language arguments in other assignments, so you know that with them you often need to do some, or maybe lots of, interpretation of the arguer's intent. You need to "read between the lines" and pay close attention to assumptions that are not explicitly stated. Insert (Cut and paste on a computer or cut and paste in the real world) Original Letter to the Editor: Define the Fallacy: Define the fallacy in question in your own words. In your own words recreate the original argument: Include ALL premises mentioned by the author and the conclusion. (Some authors will have more than one conclusion, if so mention ALL the conclusions.) Also, state any assumptions that are being made by you or implied assumptions being made by the author. Make a connection between the definition of the fallacy and the argument: Convince me that the letter to the editor does contain the fallacy that you have already defined. This is the most important part of the paper. This is your original argument and should be convincing. Mention other fallacies being committed in the letter: Simply list out other fallacies beings committed in the letter. If no other fallacies are being committed, just write none. Bibliography: Using standard MLA formatting, site your source. Dear Editor, - Anonymous

Spring 2013 Fallacies Paperphilosophyclass.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/5/2/10529894/...Extra Credit! Below&youwill&findtwodifferent&fallacies&andonthe&class&website&youwill&findtwodifferent&articles&toread.&&Please&re

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Spring 2013 Fallacies Paperphilosophyclass.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/5/2/10529894/...Extra Credit! Below&youwill&findtwodifferent&fallacies&andonthe&class&website&youwill&findtwodifferent&articles&toread.&&Please&re

- Fallacies Paper -  

 Due  Dates:    M/W  Class:  November  13,  2013  at  the  beginning  of  the  class.  

Tuesday  Night  Class:  November  19,  2013  at  7pm        

We  began  this  class  by  finding  logical  errors  within  an  argument  through  categorical  syllogism  and  propositional  logic.    Most  recently  we  have  been  analyzing  arguments  for  informal  fallacies.    Remember,  a  fallacy  is  a  defect  in  an  argument  that  consists  in  something  other  than  merely  false  premises.    A  fallacy  involves  a  mistake  in  reasoning  or  an  error.    That  is  why  critical  thinking  begins  with  the  problem  of  error.    This  is  what  you  will  be  doing  for  the  fallacies  paper.          This  section  is  pretty  self-­‐explanatory,  though  it  isn't  easy.  It  is  your  turn  to  find  fallacies  in  everyday  life.    You  have  already  done  some  looking  at  ordinary  language  arguments  in  other  assignments,  so  you  know  that  with  them  you  often  need  to  do  some,  or  maybe  lots  of,  interpretation  of  the  arguer's  intent.    You  need  to  "read  between  the  lines"  and  pay  close  attention  to  assumptions  that  are  not  explicitly  stated.          

 Insert  (Cut  and  paste  on  a  computer  or  cut  and  paste  in  the  real  world)    

 Original  Letter  to  the  Editor:                    

Define  the  Fallacy:  Define  the  fallacy  in  question  in  your  own  words.  

   

In  your  own  words  re-­‐create  the  original  argument:    Include  ALL  premises  mentioned  by  the  author  and  the  conclusion.    

(Some  authors  will  have  more  than  one  conclusion,  if  so  mention  ALL  the  conclusions.)  Also,  state  any  assumptions  that  are  being  made  by  you  or  implied  assumptions  being  made  by  the  author.  

   

Make  a  connection  between  the  definition  of  the  fallacy  and  the  argument:  Convince  me  that  the  letter  to  the  editor  does  contain  the  fallacy  that  you  have  already  defined.    This  is  the  most  important  part  

of  the  paper.    This  is  your  original  argument  and  should  be  convincing.        

Mention  other  fallacies  being  committed  in  the  letter:  Simply  list  out  other  fallacies  beings  committed  in  the  letter.    If  no  other  fallacies  are  being  committed,  just  write  ‘none’.  

 Bibliography:  

Using  standard  MLA  formatting,  site  your  source.        

 

Dear Editor, - Anonymous

Page 2: Spring 2013 Fallacies Paperphilosophyclass.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/5/2/10529894/...Extra Credit! Below&youwill&findtwodifferent&fallacies&andonthe&class&website&youwill&findtwodifferent&articles&toread.&&Please&re

How to Prepare Writing for your Paper    

Paper  Layout:  Your  paper  must  be  typed  double  space  with  1-­‐inch  margins  and  size  12  font,  Times  New  Roman.          Cover  Page:  You  must  put  your  name  and  all  such  on  a  cover  page.      Your  name  should  only  appear  on  the  cover  page,  do  not  put  your  name  as  a  header  throughout  the  paper.      

   

Finding  Letters  to  the  Editor  and  Fallacies:    

 The  Paper:  

For  this  part  you  will  collect  FOUR  examples  of  letter  to  the  editors  that  contain  fallacies,  following  these  guidelines.        

A. You  must  have  FOUR  unique  fallacies;  One  fallacy  from  Unacceptable  Premises  Column,  Two  Unique  fallacies  from  Irrelevant  Premises  Column  AND  one  fallacy  from  Insufficient  Premises  column.      Note:  many  letters  to  the  Editor  commit  more  than  one  fallacy.    You  must  mention  the  other  fallacies  being  committed  in  the  article.  However,  you  are  only  required  to  argue  for  one  of  them.      

 B. The  fallacies  must  have  been  published  as  a  letter  to  the  editor.  You  must  include  an  original  or  a  photocopy  of  the  

fallacy;  and  include  complete  bibliographic  data.    **Must  be  dated  between  July  –  Nov  2013**      

C. Name  the  fallacy  and  define  the  fallacy  in  your  own  words.    In  other  words,  do  not  use  direct  quotes.    I  want  you  to  take  the  time  and  explain  the  fallacy  in  your  own  words.      

 D. Explain  the  argument  that  is  being  presented  by  the  author  of  the  letter  to  the  editor.    This  is  the  bulk  of  your  paper.    

This  part  is  important,  because  I  may  not  interpret  the  editorial  the  way  you  do.    If  there  is  no  explanation,  I  won't  be  able  to  give  you  credit  for  your  work.  You  may  have  to  write  out  assumed  premises  that  the  author  left  unstated.    You  must  mention  any  assumptions  that  you  are  making  concerning  the  argument.  

 E. Argue  that  the  fallacy  is  being  committed  in  the  argument.    Connect  the  fallacy  that  you  defined  in  section  C  with  the  

argument  that  you  presented  in  section  D.    This  is  an  important  part  of  your  paper.        

F. Many  letters  to  the  editors  contain  more  than  one  fallacy.    However,  you  only  need  to  explain  in  detail  ONE  of  the  fallacies  being  committed.    The  other  fallacies  should  be  mentioned  within  your  paper  but  do  not  need  to  be  thoroughly  explained.    

   

Unacceptable  Premises  (1)   Irrelevant  Premises  (2)   Insufficient  Premises  (1)  Begging  the  Question   Equivocation   Hasty  Generalization  

False  Dilemma   Composition   Faulty  Analogy     Division   False  Cause     Appeal  to  the  Person   Slippery  Slope     Genetic  Fallacy       Appeal  to  the  Authority       Appeal  to  the  Masses       Appeal  to  Tradition       Appeal  to  Ignorance       Appeal  to  Fear       Straw  Man    

     

Page 3: Spring 2013 Fallacies Paperphilosophyclass.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/5/2/10529894/...Extra Credit! Below&youwill&findtwodifferent&fallacies&andonthe&class&website&youwill&findtwodifferent&articles&toread.&&Please&re

 

Page 4: Spring 2013 Fallacies Paperphilosophyclass.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/5/2/10529894/...Extra Credit! Below&youwill&findtwodifferent&fallacies&andonthe&class&website&youwill&findtwodifferent&articles&toread.&&Please&re

Extra Credit  Below  you  will  find  two  different  fallacies  and  on  the  class  website  you  will  find  two  different  articles  to  read.    Please  read  all  the  articles  and  then  answer  the  questions  concerning  each  of  the  articles.      DUNNING  KRUGER  EFFECT:      Read  the  following  article  carefully:  J.  Kruger,  D.  Dunning,  “Unskilled  and  Unaware  of  It:    How  Difficulties  in  Recognizing  One's  Own  Incompetence  Lead  to  Inflated  Self-­‐Assessments,”  Journal  of  Personality  and  Social  Psychology  77  (1999):    1121-­‐1134.    After  reading  the  article  answer  the  questions  below:    •Describe  the  Dunning-­‐Kruger  effect  in  the  clearest  and  simplest  terms  you  can.      •What  are  the  predictions  that  Dunning  and  Kruger  make  in  their  study?      •What  conclusion  do  they  draw?      •What  lesson  should  careful  thinkers  learn  from  this  research?      -­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐-­‐    THE  ILLUSION  OF  CONTROL:    Read  the  following  article  carefully;  “Illusion  of  Control,”  by  Martin  Poulter.    After  reading  the  article  answer  the  questions  below:    •What  is  the  illusion  of  control?    •How  does  it  manifest  in  our  lives?    •Give  examples.  If  you  have  the  impression  that  some  phenomena  is  under  your  control,  how  would  you  check  to  see  if  it  really  is?