Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
"To achieve sustainable development in Itaquera, the city must develop an open space network that spatially integrates economic, cultural and ecological infrastructures. " During the spring studio, we worked in collaboration with the Sao Paulo city planning department, COHAB and SEHAB(housing departments) to re-envision the proposed master plan for the area surrounding the Corinthians stadium for the 2014 World Cup. The project was concluded with the publication that was sent to the Sao Paulo city officials.
Citation preview
To achieve sustainable urban development in Itaquera, the city must develop an open space network that spatially integrates economic, ecological and cultural infrastructures.
To be successful, the Institutional and Technical Hub of Itaquera proposal requires urban intensification. This entails increasing the density of the site by utilizing the existing programmatic anchors and adjacent neighborhood urban fabric to create Common Ground; a new armature that provides for housing and mixed-use buildings within the site.
In order to do this, we see the existing ‘empty’ or residual space and the severe topography on site to be advantages in an integration strategy. Instead of defining where new built fabric needs to be, we instead define where the Common Ground needs to be. These preserved spaces integrate not only the existing fabric but also new development. Common Ground is conceived as a dynamic infrastructure that can change over time based on organic public uses and private incremental growth of programs surrounding it. In true public/private partnership fashion, the sale of extra private development spurs additional and new public space growth.
In addition to this open space network, we also introduce new architectural typologies that can accommodate for incremental growth. These are based on topological conditions, scalar and programmatic relations onsite. This new topography and open space network allows for the creation of Common Ground; an ecological infrastructure that allows for increased mobility and an intensification and densification of economic and cultural functions.
COMMON GROUNDIntegrating ItaqueraKrystal Grullon, Parnika Ray, Revati Naryan, Zachary Craun
LOREM IPSUM
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliquam at leo eros. Quisque molestie cursus erat vel porttitor. Nullam enim mauris, lobortis ut placerat eu, iaculis vitae erat. Etiam interdum, ante et scelerisque suscipit, mauris arcu vehicula neque, rhoncus hendrerit justo velit sed elit. Curabitur condimentum
hendrerit scelerisque. Aliquam nec magna et neque blandit adipiscing. Integer bibendum magna non sapien mollis blandit. Etiam eget tortor enim, suscipit viverra libero. Nullam non mauris ipsum. Duis aliquet consectetur pharetra. Quisque vestibulum, arcu ac lobortis ullamcorper, arcu nunc tincidunt elit, eget vestibulum justo sem ut velit. In ut pharetra neque. Maecenas consectetur, erat eget rhoncus sodales, arcu enim gravida orci, eu ullamcorper velit sapien
SITE ANALYSIS / CRITIQUE
MOBILITY - ACTIVITY - USER ANALYSIS
MASTER PLAN CRITIQUE
SITE ANALYSIS
Sao Paulo is looking to take full advantage of the 2014 World Cup. One stadium that is being constructed for the event is in Itaquera, on the eastern edge of the city. The stadium afterwards will be the home of the Corinthians, a popular local football club. Currently, city officials plan on using the rest of the site to develop a technical hub that will serve both international and regional
needs. Our critique of their master plan is that it is not cognizant of the local population or local needs. The site is surrounded by a ring of what we call ‘residual space’ which includes parking lots, large transit infrastructure and open spaces. These literally cut off the surrounding community from the amenities in the site, and forces them to drive into the site from their homes. The car-centric and insular approach to the site is a disadvantage.
LOREM IPSUM
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliquam at leo eros. Quisque molestie cursus erat vel porttitor. Nullam enim mauris, lobortis ut placerat eu, iaculis vitae erat. Etiam interdum, ante et scelerisque suscipit, mauris arcu vehicula neque, rhoncus hendrerit justo velit sed elit. Curabitur condimentum hendrerit scelerisque. Aliquam nec magna et neque blandit adipiscing. Integer bibendum magna non sapien mollis blandit. Etiam eget tortor enim, suscipit viverra libero. Nullam non
mauris ipsum. Duis aliquet consectetur pharetra. Quisque vestibulum, arcu ac lobortis ullamcorper, arcu nunc tincidunt elit, eget vestibulum justo sem ut velit. In ut pharetra neque. Maecenas consectetur, erat eget rhoncus sodales, arcu enim gravida orci, eu ullamcorper velit sapien nec risus. Aliquam non felis diam, ac elementum elit. Nam mattis elit ut nisi ornare et mollis augue condimentum. Praesent pellentesque semper justo, vel venenatis dolor imperdiet at. Vestibulum eleifend suscipit arcu, ut gravida nisl elementum quis. Sed vel risus orci, ac rhoncus sem.
SITE STRATEGY
PROCESS
SITE STRATEGY & PROCESS
Our strategy for the site consists of identifying these residual spaces and programmatic anchors and using them as an armature to create a new type of infrastructure, one which we call Common Ground. This void network is a preserved public space corridor along which both private and public development occurs. Instead of the residual being a disconnection, we see it as a connection.
Identify programmatic anchors and adjacent residual spaces
Intensify and densify programs along a void network
Connect through a new dynamic void and program network
Grow both program and void through public activity and market forces
We analyze this strategy specifically at the stadium site, but this technique can be applied to virtually any of the residual space in the site, as identified in the diagram above. In order for this void network to be performative instead of a barrier, it needs to provide for mobility between programs. This is a potentially difficult challenge because of the existing topography and ecology, compounded by the addition of new transit infrastructure.
STADIUM SITE ANALYSIS
Integration through Space, Topography & Program
Ease of Mobility
Segregation through Space, Topography & Program
Mobility Difficulties
Slope
Infrastructure
1332 Parking spaces for Corinthian Stadium Move parking beneath highway & stadium Free area is sold for development Parceled into mixed-use lots
DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGY
SPACE ANALYSIS CIRCULATION ANALYSIS
Public Space Network created by layering hardscape and softscape design elements
STADIUM SITE STRATEGY
PublicSpace
PetrobasOil Line
Semi-Public Space
ExistingBuildings
AffectedBuildings
Streets
Parking Spaces
Highway
Expanded PublicSpace Network
Development alongPublic Space Network
Plaza StadiumPUBLIC SPACE CONNECTION
LOREM IPSUM
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliquam at leo eros. Quisque molestie cursus erat vel porttitor. Nullam enim mauris, lobortis ut placerat eu, iaculis vitae erat. Etiam interdum, ante et scelerisque suscipit, mauris arcu vehicula neque, rhoncus hendrerit justo velit sed elit. Curabitur condimentum hendrerit scelerisque. Aliquam nec magna et neque blandit adipiscing. Integer bibendum magna non sapien mollis blandit. Etiam eget tortor enim, suscipit viverra libero. Nullam non
PUBLIC SPACE CONNECTION
STADIUM SITE STRATEGY
Overcoming the challenge of disconnection due to existing topography and ecology and new transit infrastructure is studied at the Corinthians Stadium. We propose moving the parking and providing pedestrian access to the adjacent neighborhood. We begin with a monofunctional anchor on either side; housing and sport/mall. A new mixed-use development blends the two, allowing for a new type of community to be created which begins to then impact the anchors.
SITE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
ZONING
Residential
Vertical Residential
Hotel
Commercial
Institutional
Vacant Buildings
Free Area
CIRCULATION & PARKINGFLOOR AREA RATIO
2 FAR 4 FAR 5 FAR pedestrian circulation vehicular circulation
PERSPECTIVE
KEY PLAN
IncrementalHousing Unit
Commercial
Civic Building
.5 FAR
2 FAR 4 FAR
PERSPECTIVE‘Common ground’ generates new housing typology and commercial spacenear the stadium.
FLEXIBLE UNIT TYPOLOGY / MIXED-USE STRATEGY
LOREM IPSUM
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliquam at leo eros. Quisque molestie cursus erat vel porttitor. Nullam enim mauris, lobortis ut placerat eu, iaculis vitae erat. Etiam interdum, ante et scelerisque suscipit, mauris arcu vehicula neque, rhoncus hendrerit justo velit sed elit. Curabitur condimentum hendrerit scelerisque. Aliquam nec magna et neque blandit adipiscing. Integer bibendum magna non sapien mollis blandit. Etiam eget tortor enim, suscipit viverra libero. Nullam non
Standardized units withina flexible footprintallow forthe expansion of residentialunits.
Exterior expansion is alsoaccomodated at both the ground floor and the upperbalcony levels.
PERSPECTIVE COMMON GROUND
We see our Common Ground strategy affecting not only the large connections between monofunctional programs but also the new mixed-used typologies in the new development. This public space network creates courtyards and balconies which connects the community and creates vibrant public spaces.
2020
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Vastu Shilpa Foundation. HUDCO+The World Bank. Aranya Housing; Indore, India. 1983-1989 Government of Mumbai. Artists Village; Mumbai, India. 1983-1986 Hassan Fathy. New Gourna Village UNESCO; Luxor West Bank, Egypt. 1946-1952 UN, Peter Land, and International/Local Architects. PREVI-LIMA Housing Competition; Lima, Peru. 1983-1989 Batlle I Roig Arquitectes. Vall d’en Joan; Baix Llobregat, Spain. 1974 Weiss/Manfredi. Seattle Art Museum Olympic Sculpture Park; Seattle, USA. 2001-2007. Yew Wei. Inhabiting the Landscape/Seoul Design Olympiad(Honorable Mention); Seoul, Korea. 2008 Saraiva e Associados. Regeneration of Cabuco de Baixo 5; Sao Paulo, Brasil 2011. Anita Berrizbeitia, Linda Pollak. Inside Outside: Between Architecture and LAndscape; Rockport 2003. Maxwell Fry and JAne Drew. Tropical Architecture in dry and humid zones; Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company; Malabar, Florida1982.
