Sreeram 3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    1/44

    CHAPTER 1

    INTRODUCTION

    1.1 ABOUT THE STUDY

    Mobile carriers have been a revelation in recent years. Influences of 3G have even more

    added oil to fire. Telecom industry contributes to more than 3% of nation growth. It is indeed a

    booming industry to reckon with. Evaluation of the services is a prerequisite for their

    development and sustained growth.

    Quality and Service mechanism control the performance, reliability and usability of a

    telecommunications service. Mobile cellular service providers may offer mobile Q & S to

    customers just as the fixed line PSTN services providers and Internet Service Provides (ISP) may

    offer Q & S. Q & S mechanisms are always provided for circuit switched services, and areessential for non-elastic services, for example streaming multimedia. It is also essential in

    networks dominated by such services, which is the case in today's mobile communication

    networks, but not necessarily tomorrow.

    Mobility adds complication to the Q & S mechanisms, for several reasons:

    A phone call or other session may be interrupted after a handover, if the new base station

    is overloaded. Unpredictable handovers make it impossible to give an absolute QoS guarantee

    during a session initiation phase.

    The pricing structure is often based on per-minute or per-megabyte fee rather than flat

    rate, and may be different for different content services.

    A crucial part of Q & S in mobile communications is grade of service, involving outage

    probability (the probability that the mobile station is outside the service coverage area, or

    affected by co-channel interference, i.e. crosstalk) blocking probability (the probability that the

    required level of Q & S can not be offered) and scheduling starvation. These performance

    measures are affected by mechanisms such as mobility management, radio resource

    management,admission control, fair scheduling,channel-dependent schedulingetc.

    Many factors affect the quality of service of a mobile network. It is correct to look at Q &

    S mainly from the customer's point of view, that is, Q & S as judged by the user. There are

    standard metrics of Q & S to the user that can be measured to rate the Q & S.

    1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handoverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handoverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_stationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overloadedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_ratehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_ratehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grade_of_servicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Outage_probability&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Outage_probability&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_probabilityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheduling_starvationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheduling_starvationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobility_managementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_resource_managementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_resource_managementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_resource_managementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Admission_control&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_schedulinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel-dependent_schedulinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel-dependent_schedulinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel-dependent_schedulinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_stationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overloadedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_ratehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_ratehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grade_of_servicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Outage_probability&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Outage_probability&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_probabilityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheduling_starvationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobility_managementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_resource_managementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_resource_managementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Admission_control&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_schedulinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel-dependent_schedulinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handover
  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    2/44

    These metrics are: the coverage, accessibility (includes GOS), and the audio quality. In

    coverage the strength of the signal is measured using test equipment and this can be used to

    estimate the size of the cell. Accessibility is about determining the ability of the network to

    handle successful calls from mobile-to-fixed networks and from mobile-to-mobile networks. The

    audio quality considers monitoring a successful call for a period of time for the clarity of thecommunication channel. All these indicators are used by the telecommunications industry to rate

    the quality of service of a network.

    The Q & S in industry is also measured from the perspective of an expert (e.g. teletraffic

    engineer). This involves assessing the network to see if it delivers the quality that the network

    planner has been required to target. Certain tools and methods (protocol analysers, drive tests and

    Operation and Maintenance measurements), are used for this Q & S measurement. Protocol

    analysers are connected to BTSs, BSCs, and MSCs for a period of time to check for problems in

    the cellular network. When a problem is discovered the staff can record it and it can be analysed.

    Drive tests allow the mobile network to be tested through the use of a team of people who

    take the role of users and take the Q & S measures discussed above to rate the Q & S of the

    network. This test does not apply to the entire network, so it is always a statistical sample. In the

    Operation and Maintenance Centres (OMCs), counters are used in the system for various events

    which provide the network operator with information on the state and quality of the network.

    Finally, customer complaints are a vital source of feedback on the Q & S, and must not be

    ignored.

    In general, grade of service (GOS) is measured by looking at traffic carried, traffic

    offered and calculating the traffic blocked and lost. The proportion of lost calls is the measure of

    GOS. For cellular circuit groups an acceptable GOS is 0.02. This means that two users of the

    circuit group out of a hundred will encounter a call refusal during the busy hour at the end of the

    planning period. The grade of service standard is thus the acceptable level of traffic that the

    network can lose. GOS is calculated from the Erlang-B formula, as a function of the number of

    channels required for the offered traffic intensity.

    The audio quality of a cellular network depends on, among other factors, the modulation scheme

    (e.g. FSK, QPSK) in use, matching to the channel characteristics and the processing of the

    received signal at the receiver using DSPs.

    2

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grade_of_servicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erlang_unit#Erlang_B_formulahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grade_of_servicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erlang_unit#Erlang_B_formula
  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    3/44

    1.2 INDUSTRY PROFILE

    Vodafone Group is a global telecommunications company headquartered in London, United

    Kingdom. It is the world's largest mobile telecommunications company measured by revenues

    and the world's second-largest measured by subscribers (behind China Mobile), with around 341

    million proportionate subscribers as of November 2010. It operates networks in over 30 countries

    and has partner networks in over 40 additional countries. It owns 45% ofVerizon Wireless, the

    largest mobile telecommunications company in the United States measured by subscribers

    Bharthi Airtel Limited was started on 1995 as a Public Limited Company that provides GSM

    mobile services in all the 22 telecom services in India, SriLanka, Bangaladesh and now 16

    Countries in Africa. Provides Telemedia services in 87 cities in India. It also provides an

    integerated suite of enterprise solutions in addition to providing long distance both nationally and

    internationally. It also DTH and IPTV services.

    Reliance Communications Limitedis an Indian broadband and telecommunications company

    headquartered in Navi Mumbai, India. It is the 16th largest operator in the world with more than

    136 million subscribers. RCOM, founded by Dhirubhai H Ambani (19322002), is the flagship

    company of the Reliance Group. The company has five segments: Wireless segment includes

    wireless operations of the company;broadband segment includes broadband operations of the

    company; Global segment include national long distance and international long distance

    operations of the company and the wholesale operations of its subsidiaries; Investment segment

    includes investment activities of the Group companies, and Other segment is consists of the

    customer care activities and direct-to-home(DTH) activities

    It ranks among the top 5 telecommunications companies. Retrieved 2010-04-14. in the world

    by number of customers in a single country. Reliance Communicationscorporate clientele

    includes 2,100 Indian and multinational corporations, and over 800 global, regional and domestic

    carriers. The company has established a pan-India, next-generation, integrated (wireless and

    wireline), convergent (voice, data and video) digital networkthat is capable of supporting

    services spanning the entire communications value chain, covering over 24,000 towns and

    600,000 villages. Reliance Communications owns and operates the next-generation IP-enabled

    connectivity infrastructure, comprising over 190,000 kilometers offiber optic cable systems in

    India, USA, Europe, Middle East and the Asia Pacific region

    3

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Londonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdomhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdomhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mobile_network_operatorshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Mobilehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Wirelesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhirubhai_Ambanihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirelesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_Internet_accesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_To_Homehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinational_corporationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirelesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_electronicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Protocolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_fiberhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_fiberhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Londonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdomhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdomhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mobile_network_operatorshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Mobilehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Wirelesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhirubhai_Ambanihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirelesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_Internet_accesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_To_Homehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinational_corporationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirelesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_electronicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Protocolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_fiber
  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    4/44

    Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. formed on 1 st October 2000, is one of the largest & leading

    public sector units providing comprehensive range of telecom services in India. BSNL has

    installed Quality Telecom Network in the country & now focusing on improving it, expanding

    the network, introducing new telecom services with ICT applications in villages & winning

    customer's confidence. Itis the only service provider, making focused efforts & plannedinitiatives to bridge the rural-urban digital divide in ICT sector. In fact there is no telecom

    operator in the country to beat its reach with its wide network giving services in every nook &

    corner of the country & operates across India except New Delhi & Mumbai. Whether it is

    inaccessible areas of Siachen glacier or North-Eastern regions of the country, BSNL serves its

    customers with a wide bouquet of telecom services namely Wireline, CDMA mobile, GSM

    mobile, Internet, Broadband, Carrier service, MPLS-VPN, VSAT, VoIP, IN Services, FTTH, etc.

    BSNL is numero uno of India in all services in its license area. The company offers wide

    ranging & most transparent tariff schemes designed to suit every customer. BSNL

    has 90.09 million cellular & 5.06 million WLL customers as on 31.07.2011. 3G Facility has been

    given to all 2G connections of BSNL. In basic services, BSNL is miles ahead of its rivals,

    with 24.58 million wireline phone subscribers i.e. 71.93% share of the wireline subscriber base.

    BSNL has set up a world class multi-gigabit, multi-protocol convergent IP infrastructure

    that provides convergent services like voice, data & video through the same Backbone &

    Broadband Access Network. At present there are 8.09 million broadband customers.

    The company has vast experience in planning, installation, network integration & maintenance of

    switching & transmission networks & also has a world class ISO 9000 certified Telecom

    Training Institute.

    Aircel group is a mobile phone service providerin India. It offers

    both prepaidandpostpaidGSM cellular phone coverage throughout India. The Aircel group is a

    joint venture between Maxis Communications Berhad of Malaysia and Sindya Securities &

    Investments Private Limited, whose current shareholders are the Reddy family of Apollo

    Hospitals Group of India, with Maxis Communications holding a majority stake of 74. Aircel

    commenced operations in 1999 and is today the leading mobile operator in Tamil Nadu, Assam,

    North- East and Chennai.

    4

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phonehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_providerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prepaidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postpaidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phonehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_providerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prepaidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postpaid
  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    5/44

    It is Indias fifth largest GSM mobile service provider & seventh largest mobile service

    provider (both GSM and CDMA) with a subscriber base of over 51.83 million, as of January 31,

    2011. It has a market share of 6.72% among the GSM operators in the country.

    Additionally, Aircel has also obtained permission from Department of

    Telecommunications (DoT) to provide International Long Distance (ILD) and National Long

    Distance (NLD) telephony services. It also has the largest service in Tamil Nadu. Maxis, Aircel's

    majority stake holder at that time, raised 11.2 billions (USD 3.36 billions) for its shareholders

    (UTSB), making it the largest IPO in Malaysia and Southeast Asia, Tamil Nadu.

    5

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Telecommunicationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Telecommunicationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Long_Distance&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Long_Distance&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Long_Distance&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_Naduhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_Naduhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Telecommunicationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Telecommunicationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Long_Distance&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Long_Distance&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Long_Distance&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_Naduhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_Nadu
  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    6/44

    1.3 COMPANY PROFILE

    SAYANORA INFOSERVE Pvt. Ltd.

    We at Sayanora Info Serve [p] ltd. offer a wide range of Mobile Services with world Class

    quality and support. We ensure that there is no room for compromise when you strive forexcellence.

    We are a decade old company and have always maintained our ascendance by being the first to

    introduce brand new products and services. Our services include Mobile Service Quality

    Management, ERP on the Internet and Training. We have a team to well-qualified professionals

    with proven track record who strive to innovate for improving value to your customers.

    We are proud of our clientele that consists of growing number of small and medium businesses

    both in India and abroad, which serves as a testimony to our commitment for quantity,

    performance and customer satisfaction. Our services have inspired customer loyalty symbolizing

    our quest for excellence.

    Features

    1. Automatic call distribution to manage large and unpredictable call volumes

    2. Predictive dialing to deliver and maximize agent productivity and visible business benefits

    3. Real time and historical reporting to provide clear and concise view of agent performance.

    4. Multimedia recording and quality monitoring

    5. Call monitoring, call whispering and call barging capabilities.

    6. Integrated voice, email, web chat and sms communication to be in constant touch with the

    customer.

    7. Noise cancellation and binaural headsets for agents

    Benefits

    - 100% Operational Transparency and 100% Recording

    - Effective call agents

    - Perfect Blend of Quality and Excellent Customer Service

    - Real Time Reporting

    - Creates a New Revenue Stream.

    6

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    7/44

    1.4 NEED FOR THE STUDY

    The study concentrates on determining customer preferences towards mobile service carriers

    such as Aircel, Airtel, Vodafone, Docomo etc. The study enhances the service they offer to their

    customers. It helps to improve the quality rendered and creates a positive image among new

    users. The study helps in formulation of new schemes and binds the customer expectation at will.

    It helps to know the customer satisfaction while using a carrier and adapt to changing trends.

    7

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    8/44

    1.5 SCOPE FOR THE STUDY

    It collects feedback from the rational customer. The information acts as a source of valuable

    input for the carrier companies to popularize themselves. It helps them to avoid flaws in the

    services they offer to customer. To update the current customer requirements they seek at the

    fullest. To stay in the market ahead of competing carriers.

    8

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    9/44

    1.6 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

    Primary Objective:

    To improve the service and quality of the mobile carriers.

    Secondary Objective:

    To know the customer satisfaction on using those mobile carriers.

    To determine the customer preferences towards various mobile carriers.

    To know the changing trends in mobile service and customer adoption to it.

    To forecast the customer needs in mobile services and upgradation those in future by

    service carriers.

    9

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    10/44

    1.7 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

    The study was focused only in urban Chennai.

    The time period provided to conduct the survey was very limited.

    Thus, all the aspects of the study could not be covered.

    It is the mere justification of facts, may not be true always.

    10

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    11/44

    1.8 REVIEW OF LITERATURE

    1.8.1. LORENA BATAGAN., (1995)

    A characteristic of todays society is the increasing use of modern information and

    communication technologies in all areas. Computer applications, called e-services, are being

    developed to provide efficient access to services, electronically. Quality management systems

    are needed to provide a consistent way to select, evaluate, prioritize and plan the right eservices.

    The increasing use of e-services has raised the need to define standards and means to assess and

    assure quality. Investment in e-services is an important step to improve the quality of life in our

    dynamic society.

    After a brief introduction that describes the adoption of electronic services in individuals

    daily routine and the need for quality management, this article defines in its second chapter terms

    and concepts that are part of the Quality Management Framework. Then, the third chapter

    describes what e-services are, how they are classified and also their benefits to the user followed

    in the forth chapter by definition of means to evaluate and metrics to measure the quality of e-

    services. In the end, this article restates the benefits of e-services, the need for eservice quality

    management and unveils future development initiatives in domain.

    1.8.2. CHEN LEE., (1999)

    A quality of service (QoS) management framework for systems is presented that satisfies

    application needs along multiple dimensions such as timeliness, reliability, cryptographic

    security and other application-specific quality requirements. In this model, end users' quality

    preferences are taken into account when system resources are apportioned across multiple

    applications such that the net system utility accrued to the end-users is maximized.

    The framework facilitates QoS tradeo through a semantically rich (in terms of

    expressiveness and customizability) QoS specification interface that enables the end users to give

    guidance on the qualities they care about and the tradeos they are willing to make under potential

    resource shortages. The interface also allows the user or system administrator to define fine-

    11

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    12/44

    grained service requests easily for multi-dimensional complex QoS provisioning. Furthermore,

    by introducing the abstraction of Quality Index, which maps qualities to indices in a uniform

    way, and by the mathematical modeling of QoS Tradeoand Resource Tradeo,we transform the QoS management problem into a combinatorial optimization which

    ultimately enables us to quantitatively measure QoS, and to analytically plan and allocate

    resources. A series of optimization algorithms is developed that tackle the QoS management

    problem which is provably NP-hard. The first set of algorithms treats the problem of maximizing

    system utility by allocating a singlefinite resource to satisfy the QoS requirements of multipleapplications along multipleQoS dimensions.

    Two near optimal algorithms are developed to solve this problem. The first yields an

    allocation within a known distance from the optimal solution, and the second yields an allocation

    whose distance bound from the optimal solution can be explicitly controlled by a QoS manager.We compare the run-times of these near-optimal algorithms and their solution quality relative to

    the optimal allocation, which in turn is computed using dynamic programming. The second set of

    algorithms deals with apportioning multiplefinite resources to satisfy the QoS needs of multipleapplications along multipleQoS dimensions.

    Three strategies are evaluated and compared First, dynamic programming and integer

    programming with branch-and-bound compute optimal solutions to this problem but exhibit very

    high running times. Then the integer programming approach is adapt to yield near-optimal

    results with faster running times. Finally, an approximation algorithm based on an extended local

    searchtechnique is presented that is less than a few percent from the optimal solution but whichis more than two orders of magnitude faster than the optimal scheme of dynamic programming.

    Perhaps more significantly, the local search technique turns out to be very scalable and

    robust as the number of resources under management increases. These detailed evaluations

    provide practical insight into which of these algorithms can be used online in real-time systems.

    1.8.3. ATUL GUPTA.,(2005)

    Purpose

    12

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    13/44

    Proposes developing a conceptual model that can be used in understanding the

    relationships between sustaining structures that support the total quality service (TQS)

    philosophy and customer satisfaction.

    Design/methodology/approach

    Integrating the SERVQUAL instrument and other work in the service quality literature,

    especially the Deming management model, this paper develops a model for understanding the

    interactions between customer satisfactions and sustaining structures.

    Findings

    This conceptual paper develops three constructs: leadership, organizational culture andemployee commitment, which are very important in achieving total quality service objectives.

    The proposed model links these three constructs with business processes and total quality

    service.

    Research limitations/ implications

    It is not an empirical investigation of customer satisfaction and sustaining structures. The

    paper does not review in detail the impact of the three constructs on business processes. A

    researcher who plans to do a customer satisfaction study could benefit from the proposed model

    as it will provide valuable insights about the interactions between customer satisfaction and

    sustaining structures.

    Originality/value

    This paper provides an important conceptual framework for evaluating the relationships

    between customer satisfactions and sustaining structures.

    1.8.4. MANOEL CAMILLO PENNA., (2004)

    Two main approaches can be identified for QoS management, the first is oriented to

    infrastructure management and the second deals with alignment of service delivery with business

    objectives. This paper addresses the main issues arising under the second perspective. A critical

    issue is to provide an effective way to define and evaluate service level indicators. Two

    13

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    14/44

    evaluation modes naturally arise: on-line and off-line. On-line methods compute indicators

    values when a related event occurs whereas off-line methods do at the end of a pre-defined

    assessment period.

    1.9 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

    Research is a scientific and systematic enquiry for pertinent information on a specific topic.

    Research is a careful investigation searching for new facts in any branch of knowledge. Research

    includes defining and redefining problems, formulating hypothesis or suggested solutions;

    collecting, organizing and evaluating data; making deduction and reaching conclusions; and

    finally testing the conclusion to determine whether they fit the formulated hypotheses.

    Methodology is the branch of philosophy that analyzes the principles and procedures of

    inquiry in a particular discipline. It deals with cognitive processes imposed on research by the

    problems arising from the nature of its subject matter.

    1.9.1 RESEARCH DESIGN

    In this study, the researcher used Descriptive Research Design for testing. Descriptive

    Research includes survey and various fact-finding inquiries. The main purpose of descriptive

    research is description of the state of affairs as they exist at present. The main characteristic of

    this method is that the researcher has no control over the variables, i.e., he can only report what

    is happening. The methods of research used in descriptive research are all kinds of survey

    methods including comparative and correlation methods.

    Research Instrument

    In this study, the researcher used a Structured Questionnaire as a research instrument.

    Structured questionnaire consists of open-ended and close-ended questions in relation to the

    aspect for which the researcher collects data. It is presented with the same working and in the

    same order to the respondents.

    1.9.2 SAMPLING DESIGN

    14

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    15/44

    In this study, the researcher used the Convenience Sampling. It is a non-probability sampling

    technique where subjects are selected because of their convenient accessibility and proximity to

    the researcher.

    Sources

    In this study, the researcher has collect the samples from the customers of the samplearea. The sample size of this study is 80.

    1.9.3 METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION

    Primary Data

    The primary data are the data which are collected through questionnaire providing first-hand

    account of information. All the questionnaires were collected through personal contact from the

    respondents.

    Secondary data

    The secondary data are the data which were already collected for some other purposes,

    processed and subsequently stored in the form of books, company records, journals and websites.

    Questionnaire Design

    The structured questionnaire, which is used as the research instrument, was constructed to

    extract the maximum information from the respondents. Care was taken in structuring the

    questionnaire to make the questions short and clear. The following types of questions were used

    in the questionnaire.

    Open-Ended Questions

    This type of question allows the respondents to answer in the way they choose.

    Close-ended Questions

    These are the type of questions for which the respondents are required to make choices among

    the set of alternatives given by the researcher.

    Dichotomous

    15

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    16/44

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    17/44

    CHAPTER 2

    DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

    2.1 PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS

    Table No.2.1.1 CARRIER CURRENTLY USING

    S.No. Network No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Airtel 19 25.33

    2 Aircel 18 24

    3 Vodafone 18 24

    4 Others 20 26.67

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.1 Carrier currently using

    17

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    18/44

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that mobile carriers are currently using 25.33% of the

    respondents are airtel, 24% of the respondents are aircel and Vodafone and 26.67% of the

    respondents are using other network.Table No.2.1.2 WISH TO USE OTHER BRAND

    S.No. Network No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Airtel 19 25.33

    2 Aircel 18 24

    3 Vodafone 20 26.67

    4 Others 18 24

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.2 Wish to use other brand

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that the samples are wish to use other brands are airtel

    25.33%, aircel 24%, Vodafone 26.67% and 24% for other brands.

    18

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    19/44

    Table No.2.1.3 SELECTION OF EXISTING BRAND

    S.No. Based on No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Reference 20 26.67

    2 Advertisement 40 53.33

    3 Other 15 20

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.3 Selection of existing brand

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that the respondents are select their existing brand

    based on 53.33% of them from advertisement, 26.67% of them from reference and 20% of them

    from others.

    19

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    20/44

    Table No.2.1.4 VARIOUS SCHEMES THEIR CARRIER PROVIDE

    S.No. Schemes No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Full Talk time 13 17.33

    2 Free SMS 25 33.33

    3 Freiends Plan 12 16

    4 WAP Service 15 20

    5 Hello Tunes 10 13.33

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.4 Various schemes their carrier provide

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that the samples are most of their carrier provides free

    sms 33.33% and the least carrier provides hello tunes 13.33%. And also Vodafone customers are

    mostly like their schemes such as full talk time, free sms, friends plan, wap service and hello

    tunes compare with other networks.

    Table No.2.1.5 NETWORK OF THE CURRENT CARRIER

    20

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    21/44

    S.No. Scale No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Highly satisfied 30 40

    2 Satisfied 21 28

    3 Nor satisfied or dissatisfied 17 22.67

    4 Dissatisfied 6 85 Highly dissatisfied 1 1.33

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.5 Network of the current carrier

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that 40% of the respondents are highly satisfied,

    1.33% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied, 50% of the Vodafone customers are highly

    satisfied and other networkers are highly dissatisfied their network of the current carrier.

    Table No.2.1.6 CUSTOMER CARE OF THE CURRENT CARRIER USED

    S.No. Scale No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Highly satisfied 20 26.67

    21

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    22/44

    2 Satisfied 17 22.67

    3 Nor satisfied or dissatisfied 31 41.33

    4 Dissatisfied 5 6.67

    5 Highly dissatisfied 2 2.67

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.6 Customer Care of the current carrier used

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that 41.33% of the respondents are nor satisfied of

    dissatisfied, 2.67% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied and 50% of airtel customers are

    highly satisfied and 50% of the aircel and others from highly dissatisfied their customer care of

    the current carrier.

    Table No.2.1.7 PROMOTIONAL OFFERS

    S.No. Scale No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Highly satisfied 40 53.33

    2 Satisfied 23 30.67

    3 Nor satisfied or dissatisfied 7 9.33

    4 Dissatisfied 5 6.67

    22

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    23/44

    5 Highly dissatisfied 0 0

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.7 promotional offers

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that 53.33% of the respondents are highly satisfy,

    60% of them highly satisfied from Vodafone and 0% of the respondent are highly dissatisfied

    their promotional offers.

    Table No.2.1.8 MODE OF BILL PAYMENT

    S.No. Mode of Bill Payment No. of Respondents Percentage (%)1 Internet 8 10.67

    2 Cheque 12 16

    3 Cash 55 73.33

    Total 75 100

    23

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    24/44

    Figure No.2.1.8 Mode of bill payment

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that most of the respondents (73.33%) are from cash

    payment and the least of them (10.67%) from internet payment.

    Table No.2.1.9 CREDIT FACILITY

    S.No. Scale No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Highly satisfied 20 26.67

    2 Satisfied 29 38.673 Nor satisfied or dissatisfied 12 16

    4 Dissatisfied 10 13.33

    5 Highly dissatisfied 4 5.33

    Total 75 100

    24

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    25/44

    Figure No.2.1.9 Credit Facililty

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified most of the respondents are from satisfied (38.67%),

    least of them from highly dissatisfied (5.33%), 60% of the Vodafone users are highly satisfied

    and 75% of the other users are from other networks for the credit facilities.

    Table NO.2.1.10 RECHARGE FOR THEIR CURRENT CARRIER

    S.No. Mode of recharge No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Internet 8 10.67

    2 E-Recharge 36 48

    3 Recharge Coupons 31 41.33

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.10 Recharge for their current carrier

    25

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    26/44

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that most of the respondents (48%) are from e-

    recharge, 41.33% of them from recharge coupons and 10.67% of them from internet recharge.

    Table NO.2.1.11 DENOMINATION OF RECHARGE PROVIDED IN VARIOUS

    AMOUNTS

    S.No. Denominations of Recharge No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Yes 52 69.33

    2 No 23 30.67

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.11 Denomination of recharge provided in various amounts

    26

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    27/44

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that 46.67% of the networks are like and 53.33% of

    the networks are dislike the denominations of recharge provided in various amount, 40.38% of

    the respondents are mostly benefited from aircel and other networks are like to improve their

    denomination of recharge.

    Table No.2.1.12 INTERESTED IN CHANGING CURRENT CARRIER

    S.No. Changing Current Carrier No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Yes 35 46.67

    2 No 40 53.33

    Total 75 100

    Figure No. 2.1.12 Interested in changing current carrier

    27

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    28/44

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that the other networkers are mostly (51.43%) like to

    change their current carrier and the Vodafone networkers are mostly (40%) dislike to change

    their current carrier.

    Table No.2.1.13 INTEREST IN UPDATING TO 3G

    S.No. Updating to 3G No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Yes 69 92

    2 No 6 8

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.13 Interest in updating to 3G

    28

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    29/44

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that the airtel networkers are mostly (60%) like to

    interested in updating to 3G compare with other networkers.

    Table No.2.1.14 INFORM ABOUT THE NEW SCHEME

    S.No. New Scheme No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Yes 66 88

    2 No 9 12

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.14 Inform about the new scheme

    29

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    30/44

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that most (88%) of the respondents are like and 12%

    of the respondents are dislike to inform about the new scheme.

    Table No.2.1.15 ADVERTISEMENT OF THE CARRIER

    S.No. Scale No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Highly satisfied 23 30.67

    2 Satisfied 27 36

    3 Nor satisfied or dissatisfied 21 28

    4 Dissatisfied 3 4

    5 Highly dissatisfied 1 1.33

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.15 Advertisement of the carrier

    30

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    31/44

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    32/44

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that 60% of the respondents are satisfied and 0% of

    the respondents are highly dissatisfied and 44.44% of the aircel networkers are satisfied their

    carrier used.

    Table No.2.1.17 MOBILE PORTABILITY

    S.No. Mobile Portability No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Yes 47 62.67

    2 No 28 37.33

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.17 Mobile Portability

    32

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    33/44

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that 62.67% of the respondents are like, 37.33% of

    the respondents are dislike, 44.68% of the other networkers are like and 53.57% of the Vodafone

    networkers dislike the mobile portability.

    Table No.2.1.18 CHANGE PLAN FROM PREPAID TO POSTPAID OR VICE VERSA

    S.No. Change Plan No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

    1 Yes 6 8

    2 No 69 92

    Total 75 100

    Figure No.2.1.18 Change plan form Prepaid to Postpaid or Vice Versa

    33

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    34/44

    Interpretation

    From the above table it has been identified that 66.67% of the postpaid user are like to change

    prepaid, 94.2% of the prepaid users are dislike to change postpaid plan.

    2.2 WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD

    Table No.2.2.1 NETWORK OF THE CURRENT CARRIER

    Highly

    Satisfied Satisfied

    Nor satisfied or

    dissatisfied Dissatisfied

    Highly

    dissatisfied Aggregate

    Weighted

    Average

    30 21 17 6 1 298 3.97

    Scale Representation:

    Highly Satisfied 5

    34

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    35/44

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    36/44

    Highly Dissatisfied 1

    (20 x 5) + (17 x 4) + (31 x 3) + (5 x 2) + (2 x 1)

    = 100 + 68 + 63 + 10 + 2

    = 243Weighted Average = 243/75

    = 3.24

    Interpretation

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the customer care of the

    current carrier lies between satisfied and neutral.

    Table No.2.2.3 SATISFIED WITH PROMOTIONAL OFFERS

    Highly

    Satisfied Satisfied

    Nor satisfied or

    dissatisfied Dissatisfied

    Highly

    dissatisfied Aggregate

    Weighted

    Average

    40 23 7 5 0 323 4.31

    Scale Representation:

    Highly Satisfied 5

    Satisfied 4

    Nor satisfied or dissatisfied 3

    Dissatisfied 2

    Highly Dissatisfied 1

    36

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    37/44

    (40 x 5) + (23 x 4) + (7 x 3) + (5 x 2) + (0 x 1)

    = 200 + 92 + 21 + 10 + 0

    = 323

    Weighted Average = 323/75= 4.31

    Interpretation

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the satisfied with

    promotional offers lies between highly satisfied and satisfied.

    Table No.2.2.4 SATISFIED WITH CREDIT FACILITY

    Highly

    Satisfied Satisfied

    Nor satisfied or

    dissatisfied Dissatisfied

    Highly

    dissatisfied Aggregate

    Weighted

    Average

    20 29 12 10 4 276 3.68

    Scale Representation:

    Highly Satisfied 5

    Satisfied 4

    Nor satisfied or dissatisfied 3

    Dissatisfied 2

    Highly Dissatisfied 1

    37

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    38/44

    (20 x 5) + (29 x 4) + (12 x 3) + (10 x 2) + (4 x 1)

    = 100 + 116 + 36 + 20 + 4

    = 276

    Weighted Average = 276/75

    = 3.68

    Interpretation

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the satisfied with credit

    facility lies between satisfied and neutral.

    Table No.2.2.5 RATING FOR THE ADVERTISEMENTS OF THE CARRIER

    Highly

    Satisfied Satisfied

    Nor satisfied or

    dissatisfied Dissatisfied

    Highly

    dissatisfied Aggregate

    Weighted

    Average

    23 27 21 3 1

    Scale Representation:

    Highly Satisfied 5

    Satisfied 4

    Nor satisfied or dissatisfied 3

    Dissatisfied 2

    Highly Dissatisfied 1

    (23 x 5) + (27 x 4) + (21 x 3) + (3 x 2) + (1 x 1)

    38

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    39/44

    = 115 + 108 + 63 + 6 + 1

    = 293

    Weighted Average = 293/75

    = 3.91

    Interpretation

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the rating for the

    advertisements of the carrier lies between satisfied and neutral.

    Table No.2.2.6 OVERALL SATISFACTION OF THE CARRIER USED

    Highly

    Satisfied Satisfied

    Nor satisfied or

    dissatisfied Dissatisfied

    Highly

    dissatisfied Aggregate

    Weighted

    Average

    15 45 13 2 0 298 3.97

    Scale Representation:

    Highly Satisfied 5

    Satisfied 4

    Nor satisfied or dissatisfied 3

    Dissatisfied 2

    Highly Dissatisfied 1

    (15 x 5) + (45 x 4) + (13 x 3) + (2 x 2) + (0 x 1)

    = 75 + 180 + 39 + 4 + 0

    39

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    40/44

    = 298

    Weighted Average = 298/75

    = 3.97

    Interpretation

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the overall satisfaction of

    the carrier used lies between satisfied and neutral.

    CHAPTER 3

    SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, SUGESSIONS AND CONCLUSION

    3.1 FINDINGS

    It has been identified that mobile carriers are currently using 25.33% of the respondents

    are airtel, 24% of the respondents are aircel and Vodafone and 26.67% of the respondents are

    using other network.

    It has been identified that the samples are wish to use other brands are airtel 25.33%,

    aircel 24%, Vodafone 26.67% and 24% for other brands.

    It has been identified that the respondents are select their existing brand based on 53.33%

    of them from advertisement, 26.67% of them from reference and 20% of them from others.

    It has been identified that the samples are most of their carrier provides free sms 33.33%

    and the least carrier provides hello tunes 13.33%. And also Vodafone customers are mostly

    40

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    41/44

    like their schemes such as full talk time, free sms, friends plan, wap service and hello tunes

    compare with other networks.

    It has been identified that 40% of the respondents are highly satisfied, 1.33% of the

    respondents are highly dissatisfied, 50% of the Vodafone customers are highly satisfied and

    other networkers are highly dissatisfied their network of the current carrier.

    It has been identified that 41.33% of the respondents are nor satisfied of dissatisfied,

    2.67% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied and 50% of airtel customers are highly

    satisfied and 50% of the aircel and others from highly dissatisfied their customer care of the

    current carrier.

    It has been identified that 53.33% of the respondents are highly satisfy, 60% of them

    highly satisfied from Vodafone and 0% of the respondent are highly dissatisfied their

    promotional offers.

    It has been identified that most of the respondents (73.33%) are from cash payment and

    the least of them (10.67%) from internet payment.

    It has been identified most of the respondents are from satisfied (38.67%), least of them

    from highly dissatisfied (5.33%), 60% of the Vodafone users are highly satisfied and 75% of

    the other users are from other networks for the credit facilities.

    It has been identified that most of the respondents (48%) are from e-recharge, 41.33% of

    them from recharge coupons and 10.67% of them from internet recharge.

    It has been identified that 46.67% of the networks are like and 53.33% of the networks

    are dislike the denominations of recharge provided in various amount, 40.38% of the

    respondents are mostly benefited from aircel and other networks are like to improve their

    denomination of recharge.

    It has been identified that the other networkers are mostly (51.43%) like to change their

    current carrier and the Vodafone networkers are mostly (40%) dislike to change their current

    carrier.

    41

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    42/44

    It has been identified that the airtel networkers are mostly (60%) like to interested in

    updating to 3G compare with other networkers.

    It has been identified that most (88%) of the respondents are like and 12% of the

    respondents are dislike to inform about the new scheme.

    It has been identified that 36% of the respondents are satisfied, 1.33% of the respondents

    are highly dislike and 69.57% of the Vodafone networkers are highly satisfied the

    advertisement of the carrier.

    It has been identified that 60% of the respondents are satisfied and 0% of the respondents

    are highly dissatisfied and 44.44% of the aircel networkers are satisfied their carrier used.

    It has been identified that 62.67% of the respondents are like, 37.33% of the respondents

    are dislike, 44.68% of the other networkers are like and 53.57% of the Vodafone networkers

    dislike the mobile portability.

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the network of the

    current carrier lies between satisfied and neutral.

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the customer care

    of the current carrier lies between satisfied and neutral.

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the satisfied with

    promotional offers lies between highly satisfied and satisfied.

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the satisfied with

    credit facility lies between satisfied and neutral.

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the rating for the

    advertisements of the carrier lies between satisfied and neutral.

    The weighted average shows that the opinion of the respondents about the overall

    satisfaction of the carrier used lies between satisfied and neutral.

    3.2 SUGGESTIONS

    42

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    43/44

    Other mobile carriers such as UNINOR, MTS, TATA DOCOMO, RELIANCE and

    VIRGIN MOBILES should develop themselves in the areas of Network, Customer Care, 3G,

    Advertisement, Bill Payment, and Recharge in order to be in par with leading mobile service

    carriers.

    More promotional activities like advertisement through new media vehicles can be

    initiated.

    Service can be further improved from getting customer feedback

    To build customer loyalty measures should be taken by giving standby mobiles during

    service period.

    43

  • 8/3/2019 Sreeram 3

    44/44

    3.3 CONCLUSION

    The present study was conducted at SAYANORA. The aim was to find the level of customer

    retention strategies of SAYANORA. This was done using a detailed questionnaire. The studyrevealed that the customer retention and service quality of the service was average. At the end of

    the study, as a researcher I conclude that though the quality of service can be even made

    excellent by increasing the training to employees.