66
Introduction Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Department of Mechanical Engineering Ben-Gurion University Israel ***** Summer School on ”Modeling and Computation in Biomechanics” Graz, Austria September 17, 2008 Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Compositesrudykh/2008presentationGraz.pdf · 2009-08-22 · Introduction Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites Stephan

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    13

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Introduction

    Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) andComposites

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton

    Department of Mechanical EngineeringBen-Gurion University

    Israel* * * * *

    Summer School on ”Modeling and Computation in Biomechanics”Graz, Austria

    September 17, 2008

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Introduction MotivationObjectives

    Motivation

    Electoactive polymers (EAPs) are polymers that can change theirshape in response to electrical stimulation.

    Advantages - soft, light-weighted, fast responsive and resilient.

    Limitations: the need for large electric field, relatively smallforce and energy density.

    Typical polymers have small ratio of dielectric to elasticmodulus.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Introduction MotivationObjectives

    Motivation

    Electoactive polymers (EAPs) are polymers that can change theirshape in response to electrical stimulation.

    Advantages - soft, light-weighted, fast responsive and resilient.

    Limitations: the need for large electric field, relatively smallforce and energy density.

    Typical polymers have small ratio of dielectric to elasticmodulus.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Introduction MotivationObjectives

    Motivation

    Electoactive polymers (EAPs) are polymers that can change theirshape in response to electrical stimulation.

    Advantages - soft, light-weighted, fast responsive and resilient.

    Limitations: the need for large electric field, relatively smallforce and energy density.

    Typical polymers have small ratio of dielectric to elasticmodulus.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Introduction MotivationObjectives

    Motivation

    Electoactive polymers (EAPs) are polymers that can change theirshape in response to electrical stimulation.

    Advantages - soft, light-weighted, fast responsive and resilient.

    Limitations: the need for large electric field, relatively smallforce and energy density.

    Typical polymers have small ratio of dielectric to elasticmodulus.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Introduction MotivationObjectives

    Objectives

    Electroactive polymer composites (EAPCs) are composites offlexible and high-dielectric-modulus materials.

    Investigating the mechanical response of EAPCs undergoinglarge deformations due to electrostatic excitation.

    Instability analysis at microscopic and macroscopic levels.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Introduction MotivationObjectives

    Objectives

    Electroactive polymer composites (EAPCs) are composites offlexible and high-dielectric-modulus materials.

    Investigating the mechanical response of EAPCs undergoinglarge deformations due to electrostatic excitation.

    Instability analysis at microscopic and macroscopic levels.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Introduction MotivationObjectives

    Objectives

    Electroactive polymer composites (EAPCs) are composites offlexible and high-dielectric-modulus materials.

    Investigating the mechanical response of EAPCs undergoinglarge deformations due to electrostatic excitation.

    Instability analysis at microscopic and macroscopic levels.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • ElectrostaticsElectromechanical Problem

    Part I

    Theoretical Background

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • ElectrostaticsElectromechanical Problem

    Maxwell equationsMaxwell Stress Tensor

    Maxwell equations

    Maxwell equations for electrostatics:

    ∇ · D = 0,

    whereD ≡ �0E + p

    is electric displacement or electric induction, �0 is electricconstant,

    E = −∇φ

    is electric field, φ is a continuous scalar potential, and p ispolarization.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • ElectrostaticsElectromechanical Problem

    Maxwell equationsMaxwell Stress Tensor

    Maxwell Stress Tensor

    Maxwell stress tensor:

    TM = E ⊗ D −�02

    E · EI.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • ElectrostaticsElectromechanical Problem

    Electromechanical Problem

    Equilibrium equations:

    ∇(σ + TM) + b = 0

    Constitutive law: Cauchy stress and electric field in the elasticdielectric are

    σ =1J∂Ψ

    ∂FFT and E =

    ∂Ψ

    ∂p,

    where Ψ = Ψ (F,p).

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Electromechanical ActuatorPlane Strain Electromechanical Problem. Results

    Part II

    Numerical Analysis

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Electromechanical ActuatorPlane Strain Electromechanical Problem. Results

    Electromechanical Actuator

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Electromechanical ActuatorPlane Strain Electromechanical Problem. Results

    Plane Strain Electromechanical Problem. Results

    0 5x103 1x104 2x104 2x1041.00

    1.01

    1.02

    1.03

    1.04

    1.05

    m m

    M Pa

    h0 = 0.5

    μ = 0.8 ε = 10

    φ0, V

    λ1

    Figure: The circles correspond to numerical results and the continuous curve, toanalytical solution λ1 =

    (1 − ��0

    µ

    (φ0h0

    )2)−1/4.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Instability (Mechanics)Mechanical Instability of the Transversely Isotropic Materials

    Part III

    Instabilities

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Instability (Mechanics)Mechanical Instability of the Transversely Isotropic Materials The Stability Criterion

    The Stability Criterion

    The stability criterion in terms of acoustic tensor

    Qij(N)mimj = Aαiβj(F)NαNβmimj > 0,

    whereAαiβj(F) is the tensor of elastic moduli, Nα and mi are aLagrangian and an Eulerian, respectively.

    The strong ellipticity condition for Green-elastic materials

    Qii(N) > 0 i = 1, 2, 3

    Qii(N)Qjj(N) − Qij(N)2 > 0 j , i = 1, 2, 3

    det Q(N) > 0,

    for all N, no summation.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Instability (Mechanics)Mechanical Instability of the Transversely Isotropic Materials The Stability Criterion

    The Stability Criterion

    The stability criterion in terms of acoustic tensor

    Qij(N)mimj = Aαiβj(F)NαNβmimj > 0,

    whereAαiβj(F) is the tensor of elastic moduli, Nα and mi are aLagrangian and an Eulerian, respectively.

    The strong ellipticity condition for Green-elastic materials

    Qii(N) > 0 i = 1, 2, 3

    Qii(N)Qjj(N) − Qij(N)2 > 0 j , i = 1, 2, 3

    det Q(N) > 0,

    for all N, no summation.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Instability (Mechanics)Mechanical Instability of the Transversely Isotropic Materials Analysis of a TIH Material

    The Example of the Instability Analysis

    We examine the transversely isotropic neo-Hookean (TIH) model ofthe strain energy density function suggested by deBotton et al. (2006).

    ShellFiber

    qa

    bDisturbing force

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Instability (Mechanics)Mechanical Instability of the Transversely Isotropic Materials Analysis of a TIH Material

    Analysis of a TIH Material

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Instability (Mechanics)Mechanical Instability of the Transversely Isotropic Materials Analysis of a TIH Material

    Analysis of a TIH Material

    0 . 9 7 0 . 9 8 0 . 9 9 1 . 0 00 . 0 0

    0 . 0 5

    0 . 1 0

    0 . 1 5

    0 . 2 0

    µ1/µ

    2=100

    λ

    b / a = 3 b / a = 2 b / a = 1

    u 2

    Figure: The vertical component dependence of the central point displacement on theapplied stretch ratio. µ1 and µ2 are shear moduli of fibers and matrix, respectively.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Instability (Mechanics)Mechanical Instability of the Transversely Isotropic Materials Analysis of a TIH Material

    Analysis of a TIH Material

    Figure: The dependence of the critical stretch ratio on the fibers volume fraction c1.The results are consistent with the ones obtained by Triantafyllidis and Maker (1985)for laminated material.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Instability (Mechanics)Mechanical Instability of the Transversely Isotropic Materials Analysis of a TIH Material

    Analysis of a TIH Material. Compression and Shear.

    0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 00 . 0 00 . 0 50 . 1 00 . 1 50 . 2 00 . 2 50 . 3 0 s t a b l e

    λ

    γ

    u n s t a b l e

    Figure: The unstable domain under combined shear-compression deformations. Thevolume fraction of fibers c1 = 0.25, µ1/µ2 = 20.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Part IV

    Future Research

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Future Research

    To derive the stability criterion for an electromechanicalproblem.

    To examine an electromechanical instability problem inhomogeneous and heterogeneous media.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Future Research

    To derive the stability criterion for an electromechanicalproblem.

    To examine an electromechanical instability problem inhomogeneous and heterogeneous media.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Future Research

    (model2.avi)

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

    model2.aviMedia File (video/avi)

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Part V

    Appendix

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Formulae

    Nanson’s formulads = JF−TdS.

    Push-Forwardσ = J−1PFT

    Increment of deformation

    δF = F′ − F = (G − I)F

    Coulomb’s lawF =

    14πε0

    q1q2r2

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Instability condition

    ∫B0

    (P′ − P) : (F′ − F)dV =∫

    B0

    (P′ − P)ij(F′ − F)ijdV =

    =

    ∫B0

    {[(P′ − P)ij(χ′ − χ)i],j − (P′ − P)ij,j(χ′ − χ)i

    }dV =

    =

    ∫∂B0

    [(P′ − P)ijnj(χ′ − χ)i]dS −∫

    B0

    (P′ − P)ij,j(χ′ − χ)idV =

    =

    ∫∂B0

    [(t′ − t)i(χ′ − χ)i]dS −∫

    B0

    (b′ − b)i(χ′ − χ)idV .

    That is for two different solutions of the same boundary valueproblem (Bifurcation)∫

    B0

    (P′ − P) : (F′ − F)dV = 0.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Instability condition

    Any χ makes the integral negative for some χ′ we have negativecorresponds to unstable configuration∫

    B0

    (P′ − P) : (F′ − F)dV < 0.

    The sufficent condition for uniqueness is that∫B0

    (P′ − P) : (F′ − F)dV > 0,

    for all kinematically admissible χ , χ′.

    A stronger inequality

    (P′ − P) : (F′ − F)dV > 0,for all pairs F , F′.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Instability condition

    For Green-Elastic material we consider instead of previousexpression

    W(F′) −W(F) − P : (F′ − F) > 0.

    Note:W(F′) > W(F) +

    ∂W∂F

    : (F′ − F) + O(F)2,

    W(F′) > W(F) + P : (F′ − F) + O(F′ − F)2

    W(F) > W(F′) + P′ : (F − F′) + O(F − F′)2

    (P′ − P) : (F′ − F) > 0

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Torus Topology

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Equilibrium equation

    ∫∂B

    tds =∫∂Bσn̂ds =

    ∫B

    divσdv

    with balance of linear momentum∫∂B

    tds +∫

    Bbdv = 0

    ∫B

    (divσ + b)dv = 0

    This relation supposed to hold for any volume vthe local form is

    divσ + b = 0.

    Note the acceleration is assumed to be 0.Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Cauchy’s stress theorem

    t = σn̂

    T(n)dA − T(e1)dA1 − T(e2)dA2 − T(e3)dA3 = ρ(h3

    ds)

    a

    dA1 = (n · e1) dA = n1dAdA2 = (n · e2) dA = n2dAdA3 = (n · e3) dA = n3dA

    with h→ 0

    T(n) = T(e1)n1 + T(e2)n2 + T(e3)n3 =3∑

    i=1

    T(ei)ni =(σijej

    )ni = σijniej

    T (n)j = σijni

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    tetrahedron

    Figure: Stress vector acting on a plane with normal vector n

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    KinematicsEquilibrium equationsConstitutive relation

    Kinematics

    0

    χ

    Xx

    1e 2e

    3e

    CurrentconfigurationReference

    configuration

    The deformation gradient is F = ∇X(χ), where ∇X( ) denotes thegradient operation in B0. J ≡ detF > 0 is the local current toreference volume ratio.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    KinematicsEquilibrium equationsConstitutive relation

    Equilibrium equations

    Equilibrium equation in current configuration:

    ∇x · σ + b = 0,

    where ∇x · ( ) denotes the divergence operation in B, b is thebody force in current configuration and σ is Cauchy stress.

    Equilibrium equation in reference configuration:

    ∇X · P + b0 = 0,

    where P is the 1st Piola-Kirchhoff (nominal) stress tensor andb0 = J−1b is the body force in reference configuration. Remindthat Cauchy stress is σ = J−1PFT .

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    KinematicsEquilibrium equationsConstitutive relation

    Equilibrium equations

    Equilibrium equation in current configuration:

    ∇x · σ + b = 0,

    where ∇x · ( ) denotes the divergence operation in B, b is thebody force in current configuration and σ is Cauchy stress.

    Equilibrium equation in reference configuration:

    ∇X · P + b0 = 0,

    where P is the 1st Piola-Kirchhoff (nominal) stress tensor andb0 = J−1b is the body force in reference configuration. Remindthat Cauchy stress is σ = J−1PFT .

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    KinematicsEquilibrium equationsConstitutive relation

    Constitutive relation

    Green-elastic materials:There exists a scalar function Ψ(F) such that

    P =∂Ψ(F)∂F

    .

    Incompressible Neo-Hookean model:

    Ψ =µ12

    (I1 − 3)

    where µ1 is shear modulus and I1 is the first invariant of the rightCauchy-Green strain tensor C = FTF.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    KinematicsEquilibrium equationsConstitutive relation

    Constitutive relation

    Green-elastic materials:There exists a scalar function Ψ(F) such that

    P =∂Ψ(F)∂F

    .

    Incompressible Neo-Hookean model:

    Ψ =µ12

    (I1 − 3)

    where µ1 is shear modulus and I1 is the first invariant of the rightCauchy-Green strain tensor C = FTF.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    A 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    b

    h0

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

    X2

    X1

    1 The electrodes are flexible with a negligible elastic modulus.2 There are no external loads =⇒ traction BC is t = 0.3 The actuator is thin and long =⇒ fringing field effect can be

    neglected (i.e.,T(0)M = 0).4 Plane strain loading conditions.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    A 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    b

    h0

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

    X2

    X1

    1 The electrodes are flexible with a negligible elastic modulus.2 There are no external loads =⇒ traction BC is t = 0.3 The actuator is thin and long =⇒ fringing field effect can be

    neglected (i.e.,T(0)M = 0).4 Plane strain loading conditions.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    A 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    b

    h0

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

    X2

    X1

    1 The electrodes are flexible with a negligible elastic modulus.2 There are no external loads =⇒ traction BC is t = 0.3 The actuator is thin and long =⇒ fringing field effect can be

    neglected (i.e.,T(0)M = 0).4 Plane strain loading conditions.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    A 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    b

    h0

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

    X2

    X1

    1 The electrodes are flexible with a negligible elastic modulus.2 There are no external loads =⇒ traction BC is t = 0.3 The actuator is thin and long =⇒ fringing field effect can be

    neglected (i.e.,T(0)M = 0).4 Plane strain loading conditions.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    A 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    b

    h0

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

    X2

    X1

    1 The electrodes are flexible with a negligible elastic modulus.2 There are no external loads =⇒ traction BC is t = 0.3 The actuator is thin and long =⇒ fringing field effect can be

    neglected (i.e.,T(0)M = 0).4 Plane strain loading conditions.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Boundary Conditions

    b

    h0

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

    X2

    X1

    The electrostatic boundary conditions:

    n̂ · D = 0 on X1 = ±b/2,

    φ = 0 on X2 = h0 and φ = φ0 on X2 = 0.

    The mechanical boundary conditions:

    u2 = 0 on X2 = 0 and u1 = 0 on X1 = b/2.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Boundary Conditions

    b

    h0

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

    X2

    X1

    The electrostatic boundary conditions:

    n̂ · D = 0 on X1 = ±b/2,

    φ = 0 on X2 = h0 and φ = φ0 on X2 = 0.

    The mechanical boundary conditions:

    u2 = 0 on X2 = 0 and u1 = 0 on X1 = b/2.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Strong elipticity condition

    COMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Multiphysics module

    Structural mechanics module

    Adding Maxwell stress term to mechanical stress balance

    P =∂Ψ

    ∂F+ JTMF−T .

    Electrostatics module: using moving geometry defined bydisplacement global variable ui.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Strong elipticity condition

    COMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Multiphysics module

    Structural mechanics module

    Adding Maxwell stress term to mechanical stress balance

    P =∂Ψ

    ∂F+ JTMF−T .

    Electrostatics module: using moving geometry defined bydisplacement global variable ui.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Strong elipticity condition

    COMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Multiphysics module

    Structural mechanics module

    Adding Maxwell stress term to mechanical stress balance

    P =∂Ψ

    ∂F+ JTMF−T .

    Electrostatics module: using moving geometry defined bydisplacement global variable ui.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Strong elipticity condition

    COMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Multiphysics module

    Structural mechanics module

    Adding Maxwell stress term to mechanical stress balance

    P =∂Ψ

    ∂F+ JTMF−T .

    Electrostatics module: using moving geometry defined bydisplacement global variable ui.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Strong elipticity condition

    Criterion for incremental stability

    Elastic modulusA = ∂P

    ∂F.

    The incremental 1st Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor

    δP = AδF.

    Criterion for incremental stability∫B0

    Tr{(AδF)δF}dV > 0,

    for all δF.Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Strong elipticity condition

    Criterion for incremental stability

    Elastic modulusA = ∂P

    ∂F.

    The incremental 1st Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor

    δP = AδF.

    Criterion for incremental stability∫B0

    Tr{(AδF)δF}dV > 0,

    for all δF.Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Strong elipticity condition

    Criterion for incremental stability

    Elastic modulusA = ∂P

    ∂F.

    The incremental 1st Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor

    δP = AδF.

    Criterion for incremental stability∫B0

    Tr{(AδF)δF}dV > 0,

    for all δF.Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Strong elipticity condition

    Strong elipticity condition

    Criterion for local incremental stability

    Tr{(AδF)δF} > 0,

    for all δF.Strong elipticity condition

    AαiβjNαNβmimj > 0,

    for all Nα and mi, a Lagrangian vector and a Eulerian vector,respectively.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Strong elipticity condition

    Strong elipticity condition

    Criterion for local incremental stability

    Tr{(AδF)δF} > 0,

    for all δF.Strong elipticity condition

    AαiβjNαNβmimj > 0,

    for all Nα and mi, a Lagrangian vector and a Eulerian vector,respectively.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Strong elipticity condition

    Transversely Isotropic Neo-Hookean (TIH) model

    Strain energy-density function:

    WTIH =µ̃

    2

    (I1 − 3

    )+µ̄ − µ̃

    2

    (I4 + 2

    √1I4− 3

    )where I4 = n̂ · Cn̂ is the 4th invariant of right Cauchy-Greenstrain tensor,

    µ̃ = µ2(1 + c1)µ1 + (1 − c1)µ2(1 − c1)µ1 + (1 + c1)µ2

    is the in-plane and out-of-plane shear modulus and

    µ̄ = c1µ1 + c2µ2

    is the deviatoric shear modulus with the volume fraction of fibersc1 and shell c2 = 1 − c1, shear moduli of fiber and shell µ1, µ2,respectively.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Periodic Boundary Conditions

    a

    b

    2y

    1y

    Periodic boundary conditions

    u1(b2, y2

    )= u1

    (−b

    2, y2

    )+ ∇u011 · b,

    u2(b2, y2

    )= u2

    (−b

    2, y2

    )+ ∇u021 · b,

    u1(y1,

    a2

    )= u1

    (y1,−

    a2

    )+ ∇u012 · a,

    u2(y1,

    a2

    )= u2

    (y1,−

    a2

    )+ ∇u022 · a.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • MechanicsA 2-D Model. Assumptions.

    Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code Solution

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Periodic Boundary Conditions

    a

    b

    2y

    1y

    Periodic boundary conditions

    u1(b2, y2

    )= u1

    (−b

    2, y2

    )+ ∇u011 · b,

    u2(b2, y2

    )= u2

    (−b

    2, y2

    )+ ∇u021 · b,

    u1(y1,

    a2

    )= u1

    (y1,−

    a2

    )+ ∇u012 · a,

    u2(y1,

    a2

    )= u2

    (y1,−

    a2

    )+ ∇u022 · a.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Periodic Two-Phase DomainPeriodic Composite

    Periodic Boundary Conditions. Shear.

    Part VI

    Heterogeneous materials

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Periodic Two-Phase DomainPeriodic Composite

    Periodic Boundary Conditions. Shear.

    Periodic Two-Phase Domain

    F̄ =1V

    ∫V F(x)dx = I + ∇u0, where ∇u0 is a constant matrix.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Periodic Two-Phase DomainPeriodic Composite

    Periodic Boundary Conditions. Shear.

    Periodic Composite

    a

    b

    2y

    1y

    µ1, µ2 are fiber and matrix shear moduli respectively.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Periodic Two-Phase DomainPeriodic Composite

    Periodic Boundary Conditions. Shear.

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC). Shear

    We will use a periodic boundary condition. To illustrate this type ofboundary value problem we make the example

    Figure: The simple shear deformation with PBC.

    ∇u0ij =(

    0 γ0 0

    ), µ1 = 200 · 106 Pa, µ2 = 20 · 106 Pa, γ = 10−3.

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Periodic Two-Phase DomainPeriodic Composite

    Periodic Boundary Conditions. Shear.

    Kinematics of Incremental Elasticity

    0

    F

    Xx

    1e 2e

    3e

    ReferenceconfigurationFixed Reference

    configuration

    ′x

    Infinitesimaldeformation

    ′F

    G

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

  • Periodic Two-Phase DomainPeriodic Composite

    Periodic Boundary Conditions. Shear.

    Future work

    The experimental work of the investigators from MIT illustrate thistype of problem. There are two sheets of flexible electrodes and a filmof elastomer between them. The instability occurs when the criticalapplied potential is applied. It is shown in the right pictures.

    Circular Actuator (Jean-Sébastien Plante and Steven Dubowsky,2006)

    Stephan Rudykh and Gal deBotton Stability of Electroactive Polymers (EAP) and Composites

    IntroductionMotivationObjectives

    Theoretical BackgroundElectrostaticsMaxwell equationsMaxwell Stress Tensor

    Electromechanical Problem

    Numerical AnalysisElectromechanical ActuatorPlane Strain Electromechanical Problem. Results

    InstabilitiesInstability (Mechanics)The Stability Criterion

    Mechanical Instability of the Transversely Isotropic MaterialsAnalysis of a TIH Material

    Future ResearchAppendixMechanicsKinematicsEquilibrium equationsConstitutive relation

    A 2-D Model. Assumptions.Boundary ConditionsCOMSOL Finite Element Code SolutionStrong elipticity condition

    Periodic Boundary Conditions(PBC)

    Heterogeneous materialsPeriodic Two-Phase DomainPeriodic CompositePeriodic Boundary Conditions. Shear.