Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance Results 2017 Accounting Program ReviewOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal? Increase the student retention in ASA program by 3% by 2019.
Tableau institutional retention data - Annual program review and National Student Clearinghouse Research Center persistence and retention data. (Part-time, over age 24, students at private institutions).
Current overall retention rate is 39.4%. Comparison made to National Student Clearinghouse Research Center data (First-Year Persistence and Retention Rates by Starting Enrollment - All Inst. Sectors.
The retention of students in the ASA program is low when compared to all entering students at the university level--particularly when compared to four-year privates.
Action plan for 2017-18 is to improve instructor participation in discussions, provide collaborative forums in courses, curriculum rearrangement and faculty training and information on how to advise students who are struggling in accounting program. Participate in DeVoe retention project.
Improve faculty interaction in online accounting courses.
End of course (student satisfaction) survey reported annually. Review of survey item #5.
2014-15 Data not available2015-16 CAPS Mean 4.28; ALL ASA 4.252016-17 CAPS Mean: 4.57; ALL ASA 4.3
Results indicate that ALL ASA responses to "instructor was active in discussions" has been lower for the past two years when compared to ALL CAPS. Data is not available for 2014-15 due to the way the dat was reported at that time.
Action plan for 2017-18 is to improve instructor participation in discussions, provide collaborative forums in courses and to provide faculty with training and information on how to advise students who are struggling in accounting program.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
4
4.2
4.4
4.6
2015-16 2016-17
Mean Score for EOC Survey Item - Instructor was active in Discussions - ALL CAPS to ALL ASA
Results EOC Survey - Faculty Engagement in Discussion Item CAPS N/A
Results EOC Survey - Faculty Engagement in Discussion Item ALL ASA Accounting N/A
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance ResultsOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results
Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal? Increase overall retention in DeVoe School of Business programs by 3% by 2019.
Retention rates as reported in IWU Fact Book annually.
Retention rate was 50.6% in 2016.
There is room for improvement.
Evaluate expanding existing ASB Student Success Pilot program results based upon final Pilot results: due by January 2018.
Increase effectiveness of project teams in the curriculum possibly eliminate them.
Report on decision at next Annual or Comprehensive Review.
Effectiveness of project teams is one of three lowest student satisfaction items from the End of Program survey. A combined 68.8% percent of student responses rated the effectiveness of project teams in the Excellent and Good. Categories.
There is a continuing need to evaluate effectiveness of project teams.
Evaluate the use of project teams in courses as they become due for revision or eliminate project teams.
Increase accessibility of chaplain.
Report at next Annual or Comprehensive Review.
Accessibility of chaplain is one of three lowest student satisfaction items from the End of Program survey.. A combined 66.7% percent of student responses rated the accessibility of chaplain in the Excellent and Good. Categories.
Increased accessibility of chaplain may assist in dealing with life issues as they affect Student Success and progress toward degree.
Share results with the Student Services department and individuals responsible to determine possibilities for joint cooperation toward increased Student Success.
Increase helpfulness of chaplain.
Report at next Annual or Comprehensive Review.
Helpfulness of chaplain is one of three lowest student satisfaction items from the End of Program survey.. A combined 61.8% percent of student responses rated the accessibility of chaplain in the Excellent and Good. Categories.
Increased helpfulness of chaplain may assist in dealing with life issues as they affect Student Success and progress toward degree.
Share results with the Student Services department and individuals responsible to determine possibilities for joint cooperation toward increased Student Success.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance ResultsOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal? Increase retention for ASCIT to 80% by 2020
Retention rates as reported to the VPAA every January
79.2% in 2017 Negative trend is shown in the EOC. Industry demands for skilled IT professionals are increasing with a dire need for course updates.
Increase retention through development of a new ASCIT program to better meet the needs of the students as well as the marketplace.
Increase the retention in CIT262 to 80%
EOC feedback from students 67% in 2017 Result is unacceptable and reflected in retention numbers. Workload is reflected in the EOC's as a potential issue.
Review workload in the entire course and implement changes needed to remove unnecessary activites while maintaining academic outcomes.
Increase interaction with faculty to 80% by 2020
Increase interaction with faculty rates as reported from End of program surveys
79.2% in 2017 Faculty interaction is related to student satisfaction and retention. The trend is positive but needs continuous review to maintain trend.
Work with faculty care to investigate and implement activities to increase interaction.
Increase fairness of grading to 80% by 2020
Fairness of grading reported from End of program surveys
79.2 in 2017 Fairness of grading was reflected in the EOC student feedback. Inconsistency stood out as a common factor
Work with faculty care to investigate and implement activities to increase consistency of grading.
Increase recommend program to others without reservation to 80% in 2020
Recommend without reservations reported from End of program surveys
62.5% in 2016 The trend is positive. Word of mouth recommendations is an effective way to increase retention. Increasing this number is seen as a significant factor in increasing enrollment.
Evaluate ASCIT for specific factors that may relate directly to student satisfaction as stated in the program reviews. Update program learning outcomes to better reflect the marketplace needs.Work with AES to evaluate better word of mouth interaction.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
35
512
67
41
5 6
80
0
20
40
60
80
100
Completed Failed Withdrew Retention
CIT262
Actual Goal
80 80 80
82.7
81.8
79.2
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
2015 2016 2017
ASCIT Retention
Goal Actual
80 80
64.3
79.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
2016 2017
Interaction with faculty
Goal Actual
80 80
81.5
79.2
78
79
80
81
82
2016 2017
Fairness of Grading
Goal Actual
80 80
57.1 62.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
2016 2017
Recommend without reservations
Goal Actual
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance ResultsOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal? Increase retention for HCA from 69% to 85% by 2020
Retention rates as reported to the VPAA every January
69% in 2016 In a positive trend for the last year Revise HCA 310 is a start course and has the lowest scores for retention. Add remediation to ACC-201 is their first accounting course with many students with little to no background in accounting.
Increase of helpfulness of Chaplain from 60% to 80% by 2020
Helpfulness of Chaplain rates as reported from End of Program Surveys
60% in 2016 Chaplain helpfulness was a surprise. 50% of students are not affiliated with a church and therefore may not have interest in the chaplain services.
Work with student services to search for opportunities to show students what the chaplain service offers.
Increase of accessibility of chaplain from 66.7 to 80% by 2020
Accessibility of Chaplain rates as reported from End of program surveys
66.7% in 2016 Students are not fully aware of chaplain services and what they offer.
Work with student services to investigate and implement activities to see what the chaplain services are needed and how they apply to students
Increase interaction of faculty with students from 55.2% to 80% by 2020
Interaction opportunities with faculty as reported from End of program surveys
55.2 in 2016 Only 55.2% of students are having interaction opportunities with faculty. Many students do their assignments after hours so faculty is not available. It’s an issue with
online classes.
Implement texts to faculty to help remediate this problem. 24-48 hour response time from faculty is too long in students’ opinions. 6-12 hours may be better. Or faculty can respond quickly and say they will answer fully later Training and implementation of faculty training is needed.
Ellimination of project teams to increase the students learning outcomes from 55.2% to 80% in 2020
Effectiveness of project teams as reported from End of Program Surveys
55.2% in 2016 Project teams are one of the biggest complaints from students on a continual basis. We probably lose students because of it. Why do we continue to offer it? Much of the work is individual work so it’s
difficult to do as a team.
Eliminate the Project Team assignments and make them individual assignments.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
2014 20152016
0
50
100
1 2 3
Retention of Bachelors of Science in Health
Administration Students
2015
2016
0
20
40
60
80
1 2
Increase Helpfulness of Chaplain Services
20152016
0
50
100
1 2
Increase Accessibility of Chaplain Services
2015
2016
0
20
40
60
80
1 2
Increase Interaction with Faculty
2015
2016
0
20
40
60
80
1 2
Effectiveness of Project Teams
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance ResultsOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results
Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal? Maintain retention above 80%
Retention rates as reported to the VPAA in April 2017
100% in reported data. Data reported shows the previous BMK and the new structure of the BMK. We recognize the small sample size.
Continue to monitor retention in the program on a quarterly basis as more data points are available for analysis.
Reach goals - A = 50%, B = 30%, C = 10%, D = 3, F/W = 7%
Grade distribution as reported by Assessment Team in June 2017
A = 52%, B = 23%, C = 11%, D = 1%, F/W = 12%
Distribution is moving toward goals. Reducing the F/W % is necessary.
Analyze in more detail the individual student reasons for failures and withdrawals in order to implement a plan of action.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
BS-Accounting
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance Results 2017 BS- Accounting Program ReviewOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal? Increase the student retention in all BSA accounting courses by 3% over baseline of 39.4% by 2022.
Tableau institutional data - reported and reviewed annually as part of program review process as well as National Student Clearinghouse Research Center persistence and retention data. (Part-time, over age 24, students at private institutions.)
Current overall retention rate is 39.4% compared to 46.2% nationally.
This data analysis was used to establish a preliminary benchmark for future analysis.
Action plan for 2017-18 is to improve instructor participation in discussions, provide collaborative forums in courses and to provide faculty with training and information on how to advise students who are struggling in accounting program. Participate in DeVoe retention project.
Improve faculty interaction in online BSA accounting courses to exceed the Statistical Comparison of ALL bachelor program CAPS average.
End of course (student satisfaction) survey reported annually.
In the Statistical Comparison of ALL CAPS Bachelors Programs results to "the instructor was active in discussions" results were:
BSA - 4.50 compared to 4.42 for ALL BSA/BSAO courses.
Data showed an underperformance in this area. Comparable data was not available in 2014-15. Existing data could not be used.
Action plan for 2017-18 is to improve instructor participation in discussions, provide collaborative forums in courses and to provide faculty with training on online engagement.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
4.14.24.34.44.54.6
2015-16 2016-17
Mean response rates for EOC Survey Item - "Instructor was active in discussions"
CAPS ALL BSA
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance ResultsOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results
Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal? Increase overall retention in DeVoe School of Business programs by 3% by 2019.
Retention rates as reported in IWU Fact Book annually.
Retention rate was 73.7 % in 2016.
There is room for improvement.
Evaluate expanding the separate ASB Student Success Pilot program results that are due in January 2018 to BSBA.
Increase qulaity of overall content in total and/or the pecrent ratings of excellent.
Report at next Annual or Comprehensive Review.
Quality of overall content was one of the highest student satisfaction items from the End of Program survey. A combined 89% percent of student responses rated the qulaity of overall content in the Excellent and Good. Categories.
Increased quality of overall content may assist student learning with positive effect on Student Success and progress toward the degree.
Evaluate and adjust overall quality of course content in courses as they become due for revision.
Increase quality of instruction.
Report at next Annual or Comprehensive Review.
Helpfulness of chaplain was one of the highest student satisfaction items from the End of Program survey. A combined 87.3% percent of student responses rated the accessibility of chaplain in the Excellent and Good. Categories.
Increased quality of instruction may assist student learning with positive effect on Student Success and progress toward the degree.
Share results with the DeVoe Department Faculty Chairs to determine possibilities for joint cooperation toward increased Student Success.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance ResultsOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal? Increase retention for HCA from 73.6% to 85% by 2020
Retention rates as reported to the VPAA every January
73.6% in 2016 In a positive trend for the last year based more on the great need for employees in the BIS disciplines than the program review.
Increase retention through development of a new BSBIS program to better meet the needs of the students as well as the marketplace.
Increase the quality of team projects from 48.3. to 70% by 2020
Quality of team projects rates as reported from End of Program Surveys
48.3 in 2016 Result is unacceptable and reflected in retention numbers.
Review each team project individually to reduce the quantity of team projects and rewrite the team projects needed for quality academic outcomes.
Increase in helpfulness of chaplain from 39.6 to 60% by 2020
Helpfulness of Chaplain rates as reported from End of program surveys
39.6% in 2016 Students are not fully aware of chaplain services and what they offer.
Work with student services to investigate and implement activities to see what the chaplain services are needed and how they apply to students
Increase satisfaction with program length from 44.8% to 80% by 2020
Program length as reported from End of program surveys
44.8 in 2016 Competitive pressures are apparent from market surveys showing shorter lengths of BSBIS programs are needed
Evaluate BSBIS for alternatives to shorten the length of the BSBIS and maintain program learning outcomes.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
Increase student satisfaction with overall course content from 37.9% to 80% in 2020
Overall course content satisfaction as reported from End of Program Surveys
37.9% in 2016 Consistent dissatisfaction with course content relates to the need for continuous updating of curriculum in this discipline.
Evaluate BSBIS for updating of the course content to maintain program learning outcomes. Update program learning outcomes to better reflect the marektplace needs.
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance ResultsOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement
Current Results
Analysis of Results
Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle)
What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal?Increase enrollment in BSM program by 3%.
Monthly statistics report (annual enrollment data)
Annual final enrollment for BSM and BSMO- 2017 - 5972016- 7822015 - 914
The total enrollment (BSM and BSMO) combined has dropped 35% since 2015.
Investigate and collaborate with Marketing and Enrollment Services how potential business management students are being advised. Investigate the increase in General Studies enrollment. Devise specific enrollment strategies with Marketing/Enrollment to boost enrollment.
Increase overall retention in DeVoe School of Business programs by 3% by 2019.
Tableau Retention Data - Annual review during program review
2013-14 - 74.5%;
2014-15, 77.8%,
2015-16, 80.8%.
Since 2013-14,
retention in the
BSM program has
increased by 6.3%.
Continue to monitor for
years following 2015-16 as
enrollment declined.
Increase completions (graduation) in the BSM program by 3% by 2020.
Tableau Completions Data - Annual review during program review
2013-14, 597;
2014-15, 582,
2015-16, 522 and
2016-17, 455
There has been a
significant decline
in completions
which more than
likely is due to the
downward trend
in enrollment.
Plans are underway to
revamp te BSM program in
order to enhance enrollment
and make the program more
relevant. Also, DeVoe will
need to work more closely
with AES and Marketing to
ensure new program is
marketed. Also, DeVoe is
participating on a N & G
workgroup that is focusing
on retention efforts.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
0
100
200
300
400
500
Total 2017 Total 2016 Total 2015
Final Enrollment by Academic Year for BSM and BSMO
BSM BSMO
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
BSM- 3-Year Retention Rate
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
BSM Completions over 4-Year Period
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance ResultsOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal? Increase overall retention in DeVoe School of Business programs by 3% by 2019.
Retention rate was 70.6 % in 2016.
There is room for improvement.
Consider expanding the separate ASB Student Success Pilot program results that are due in January 2018 to MBA.
Increase effectiveness of project teams in the curriculum or possibly eliminate them.
Report on decision at next Annual or Comprehensive Review.
Effectiveness of project teams is one of three lowest student satisfaction items from the End of Program survey. A combined 56.1% percent of student responses rated the effectiveness of project teams in the Excellent and Good. Categories.
There is a continuing need to evaluate effectiveness of project teams.
Evaluate the use of project teams in courses as they become due for revision or eliminate project teams.
Increase quality of overall content in total and/or the percent ratings of excellent.
Report at next Annual or Comprehensive Review.
Quality of overall content was one of the highest student satisfaction items from the End of Program survey. A combined 87.7% percent of student responses rated the quality of overall content in the Excellent and Good. Categories.
Increased quality of overall content may assist student learning with positive effect on Student Success and progress toward the degree.
Evaluate and adjust overall quality of course content in courses as they become due for revision.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance ResultsOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results
Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal? Increase retention for HCAD from 69% to 85% by 2020
Retention rates as reported to the VPAA every January
69% in 2016 In a positive trend for the last year
Look at students taking healthcare courses earlier in the program by following EOC's earlier in the program.
Increase of helpfulness of Chaplain from 42.8% to 80% by 2020
Helpfulness of Chaplain rates as reported from End of Program Surveys
42.8% in 2016 Chaplain helpfulness was a surprise. 50% of students are not affiliated with a church and therefore may have little interest in the chaplain services.
Discuss with Student Services to search for opportunities to show students what the chaplain service offers.
Increase of accessibility of chaplain from 55.2 to 80% by 2020
Accessibility of Chaplain rates as reported from End of program surveys
55.2% in 2016 Students are not fully aware of chaplain services and what they offer.
Work with student services to investigate further the chaplain servicesand make them available to the students.
Ellimination of project teams to increase the students learning outcomes from 82.7% to 90% in 2020
Effectiveness of project teams as reported from End of Program Surveys
82.7% in 2016 Project teams are one of the biggest complaints from students on a continual basis. Much of the work is individual work so it’s difficult to do as
a team.
Eliminate the Project Team assignments and make them individual assignments.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
2015
2016
0
50
100
1 2
Retention of Masters in Healthcare Administration
Students
2015
2016
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2
Increase Helpfulness of Chaplain Services
2015
2016
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2
Increase Accessibility of Chaplain Services
2015
2016
0
50
100
1 2
Increase Effectiveness of Project Teams
MS-Accounting
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance Results 2017 Accounting Program ReviewOrganizational Effectiveness Results
What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results Analysis of Results Action Taken or Improvement made
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
(Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
Performance Measure
Measurable goal
What is your goal?Increase the student retention in all MSA accounting courses by 3% by 2019.
Retention rates as reported to the VPAA every January
Current overall retention rate is
39.4%
This data analysis was
used to establish a
preliminary benchmark
for future analysis.
Action plan for 2017-18 is to
improve instructor participation
in discussions, provide
collaborative forums in courses
and to provide faculty with
training and information on how
to advise students who are
struggling in accounting program.
Participate in DeVoe retention
project.
Improve faculty interaction in online accounting courses for all courses in the MSA program. Goal is to exceed the ALL CAPS mean consistently in the Statistical Comparison of ALL CAPS MSA programs to the ALL MSA courses.
End of course (student satisfaction) survey reported annually.
In the Statistical Comparison of ALL
CAPS Masters Programs to ALL
MSA results to "the instructor was
active in discussions" results were:
2016-17 CAPS Mean 4.5; All MSA
mean 4.29
2015-16 CAPS Mean 4.48; ALL MSA
4.26
Data showed an
underperformance in this
area.
Action plan for 2017-18 is to
improve instructor participation
in discussions, provide
collaborative forums in courses
and to provide faculty with
training on online engagement.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Accounting Program Retention Rates Overall
National DeVoe Accounting
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
2015-16 2016-17
Mean response rates for EOC Survey Item - "Instructor was active in discussions"
CAPS ALL MSA
Table 6.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance ResultsOrganizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement instrument or process?
Current Results
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle) What are your current results?
What is your goal? Increase overall retention in DeVoe School of Business programs by 3% by 2019.
Retention rates as reported in IWU Fact Book annually.
Retention rate was 60.1% in 2016.
Increase effectiveness of project teams in the curriculum or possibly eliminate them.
Report on decision at next Annual or Comprehensive Review.
Effectiveness of project teams is one of three lowest student satisfaction items from the End of Program survey. A combined 57.2% percent of student responses rated the effectiveness of project teams in the Excellent and Good. Categories.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
Increase helpfulness of chaplain.
Report at next Annual or Comprehensive Review.
Helpfulness of chaplain is one of three lowest student satisfaction items from the End of Program survey.. A combined 52.3% percent of student responses rated the accessibility of chaplain in the Excellent and Good. Categories.
Analysis of Results Action Taken or Improvement made
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
There is room for improvement.
Consider expanding the separate ASB Student Success Pilot program results that are due in January 2018 to MSHRM.
There is a continuing need to evaluate effectiveness of project teams.
Evaluate the use of project teams in courses as they become due for revision or eliminate project teams.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Analysis of Results
Increased helpfulness of chaplain may assist in dealing with life issues as they affect Student Success and progress toward degree.
Share results with the Student Services department and individuals responsible to determine possibilities for joint cooperation toward increased Student Success.
Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
Complete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every process.
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance. Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations, contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
Organizational Effectiveness Results
Performance Measure What is your measurement
Current Results Analysis of Results Action Taken or Improvement made Insert Graphs or Tables of Resulting Trends (3-5 data points preferred)
Measurable goal (Indicate length of cycle)
What are your current results?
What did you learn from the results?
What did you improve or what is your next step?
What is your goal?
Increase MSM
completion rates by
3% by 2020.
Tableau
completion data-
reviewed annually
during program
review.
Results: 2013-14
290; 2014-15,
214; 2015-16, 90;
2016-17, 60.
The enrollment for
for the program
continues to
decline.
The MSM will be undergoing a
revamp in the fall of 2018.
DeVoe needs to coordinate
with AES to ensure the new
program is marketed properly
to student target markets.
Increase MSM
Retention rates by
3% by 2019.
Tableau retention
data - Reviewed
annually during
program review.
Results: 2013-14
63.0%; 2014-15
60.3%; 2015-16
76.0%
There was a
tremendous
increase in
retention between
2014-15 and 2016-
17. However, a
longer-term trend
needs to be
reviewed.
Continue to monitor
retention. Participate on N &
G Retention Workgroup and
review with program faculty
retention initatives that can
be incorporated into courses
and the program overall.
Standard #6 - Organizational Performance Results, Table 6.10
ete the following table. Provide three or four examples, reporting what you consider to be the most important data. It is not necessary to provide results for every pr.1 Standard 6 - Business Program Performance Results
Organizational effectiveness results examine attainment of organizational goals. Each business unit must have a systematic reporting mechanism for each business program that charts enrollment patterns, student retention, student academic success, and other characteristics reflecting students' performance.Key indicators may include: graduation rates, enrollment, hiring equity, increased use of web-based technologies, use of facilities by community organizations,contributions to the community, or partnerships, retention rates by program, and what you report to governing boards and administrative units.
MSM - Analysis of Results
0
20
40
60
80
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
MSM Program Retention Rates
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
MSM Program Completions