jp6b05692 1..12Standard and Fast Selective Catalytic Reduction of
NO with NH3 on Zeolites Fe-BEA Magdalena Jabonska,† Gerard
Delahay,‡ Krzysztof Kruczaa,† Artur Bachowski,§ Karolina A.
Tarach,†
Kamila Brylewska,†, Carolina Petitto,‡ and Kinga
Gora-Marek*,†
†Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, 3
Ingardena St., 30-060 Krakow, Poland ‡Institut Charles Gerhardt de
Montpellier, ICGM-MACS, 8 rue Ecole Normale, 34296 Montpellier
Cedex 5, France §Institute of Physics, Pedagogical University, 2
Podchorzych St., 30-084 Krakow, Poland Faculty of Materials Science
and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow,
30 Mickiewicz Av., 30-059 Krakow, Poland
*S Supporting Information
ABSTRACT: Two Fe-containing BEA zeolites were prepared by
ion-exchange (IE; Fe-BEA) and postsynthesis (PS; Fe- BEA/DeAl)
procedures. Similar Fe content (0.8 to 0.9 Fe wt %) was evidenced
for studied samples. Fe-BEA, prepared by ion exchange, contained
essentially iron cations at the exchange sites of the zeolite.
These iron cations are either isolated or bridged through an oxygen
atom (Fe-oxo cations). In Fe-BEA/DeAl, a high portion of iron was
introduced in the T-positions of zeolite lattice. The other part
was either at an exchange positions or deposited as oxide clusters
on the outer surface of zeolite grains. For Fe-BEA, significantly
higher acidity than for Fe-BEA/DeAl was evidenced by FT-IR studies
with adsorption of NH3 and CO. The catalytic performance of Fe-BEA
and Fe-BEA/DeAl was investigated in standard selective catalytic
reduction (SCR) (NO2/NO = 0) and fast SCR (NO2/NO = 0.85). Fe-BEA
revealed high catalytic activity in both SCR NOx reactions;
however, production of N2O was much more apparent over this
catalyst than over Fe-BEA/DeAl. In line with EPR and IR studies,
the isolated or bridged-through-an-oxygen-atom extraframework iron
oxo-sites in Fe-BEA were found to deliver higher catalytic activity
than the iron oxo-sites in tetrahedral framework positions in
Fe-BEA/DeAl.
1. INTRODUCTION
The selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia is the most
important and well-established process used to abate nitrogen
oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) from stationary sources1−3 and diesel
cars.4,5 NOx are continuously reduced by NH3 on V2O5−TiO2 oxide
with the addition of either WO3
or MoO3. 2,6 Because of the narrow operating temperature
window of the commercial catalysts, anatase to rutile phase
transformation under reaction conditions, and vanadium pentoxide
toxicity, there is a clear trend to replace V-based NH3−SCR
catalysts with these zeolite-based.7 A large number of H-form and
metal-exchanged zeolites were tested for NH3− SCR.8−14 Among them,
iron-modified zeolites, in particular, Fe- BEA15−19 and
Fe-ZSM-5,10,20−30 have been reported to be highly active catalysts
for the process; however, between different types of Fe species in
Fe-modified zeolites, only Fe3+
ions are the active sites for the NH3−SCR. 22,26,31 Depending
on the zeolite type, various Fe species can be formed, such as
isolated or binuclear Fe ions at ion-exchange positions, small
oligonuclear FexOy clusters inside or outside the pores, and large
Fe2O3 particles on the external surface,21,25,32 which contribute
to different catalytic behavior.18,19 Schwidder et al.25
correlated the activity with the concentration of Fe sites
determined by UV−vis spectroscopy. They not only found that
mononuclear Fe ions are active for the selective catalytic
reduction (SCR) of NO by isobutene or by ammonia but also confirmed
that oligomers influence the overall activity. In the case of
NH3−SCR, they concluded that oligomeric Fe-oxo species contribute
to the activity with high efficiency. Considerable effort has been
devoted to the understanding of
the mechanism of the SCR of NO by ammonia over Fe- modified
zeolites. Long and Yang,10,26 based on the comprehensive FT-IR
investigations, proposed that both ammonium ions as well as NO- and
NO2-adsorbed species play an important role in the SCR reaction on
the iron- modified ZSM-5. Delahay et al.31 have reported that in
the catalytic cycle the Fe(II) species are oxidized by O2 to
Fe(III) oxo/hydroxo species and then consumed in the NOx
intermediates production. Finally, NOx species react with ammonia
to form water and nitrogen with concomitant
Received: June 6, 2016 Revised: July 5, 2016 Published: July 6,
2016
Article
pubs.acs.org/JPCC
reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II). In summary, there is an agreement
that the Fe sites responsible for the activity in SCR and N2O
decomposition are ion-exchanged Fe-oxo species.33
The oligomeric Fe species can play the role of active centers for
NOx or N2O conversion only at high temperatures.21,31 The high
catalytic activity in SCR of NO by NH3 was obtained for the FeHBEA
containing iron as pseudotetrahedral Fe(III) species.18,19
In this work the Fe-exchanged BEA zeolites were prepared by (i)
standard ion-exchange method with aqueous Fe(NO3)3 solution and
(ii) postsynthesis procedure. A two-step post- synthesis method
consisted first of creating vacant T-sites by dealumination of a
BEA zeolite with nitric acid and then impregnating the resulting
highly siliceous BEA/DeAl zeolite with aqueous Fe(NO3)3 solution,
used as Fe3+ ions precursor. Such procedure leads to the
incorporation of iron into the framework of a BEA zeolite, that is,
into the previously created vacant T-sites. The resulting samples
were characterized at both the macroscopic and molecular levels.
The catalytic activity of zeolite catalysts in the standard and
fast NH3−SCR together with an influence of the speciation of iron
introduced into zeolites were discussed. Moreover, the role of
acidity in NH3− SCR processes was investigated.
2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION 2.1. Catalyst Preparation. The Fe-BEA
zeolite was
obtained by liquid ion-exchange method. Parent ammonium form of
zeolite NH4BEA (2 g) supplied by Zeolyst (CP814C) was dispersed in
200 mL of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O solution (pH 3.5) containing 5 × 10−4 M of
Fe3+ ions at 60 °C for 48 h. The resulting sample was filtrated,
washed with distilled water, and dried in air at RT for 48 h.
Fe-BEA/DeAl zeolites were prepared by the post-synthesis
procedure previously reported.34,35 In the first step, the aluminum
atoms were removed from the structure of BEA zeolite (Zeolyst,
CP814C) by the treatment with 13 M HNO3 under stirring (5h, 60 °C).
The resulting BEA/DeAl zeolite (2 g) was filtered and washed with
distilled water and next introduced to 200 mL of aqueous solution
of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O containing 5 × 10−4 M of Fe3+ ions (pH 3.5). The
suspension was stirred at RT for 48 h; next, temperature was
increased to 70 °C until water was completely evaporated. The iron
content, determined by inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis,
was equal 0.8 wt % for Fe-BEA and 0.9 wt % for Fe-BEA/DeAl. All
obtained samples, both protonic and iron forms, were
calcined at 450 °C for 2 h. 2.2. Catalyst Characterization. 2.2.1.
Chemical Compo-
sition, Structural, and Textural Data. The Si, Al, and Fe
concentrations in the studied materials were determined by the ICP
OES spectroscopy with Optima 2100DV (PerkinElmer) instrument. The
powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were
carried out using X’Pert Pro Philips (PANalytical Cubix
diffractometer), with CuKα radiation, λ = 1.5406 Å and a graphite
monochromator in the 2θ angle range of 5−40°. X-ray powder patterns
were used for structural identification of the relative
crystallinity value (%Cryst) for all of the zeolites. The
determination of the relative crystallinity value was based on the
intensity of the peaks in the range between 10 and 60°. The
Brunauer−Emmett−Teller (BET) surface area and the
pore volume of the samples were determined by N2 sorption at −196
°C using a 3Flex (Micromeritics) automated gas adsorption system.
Prior to the analysis, the samples were
degassed under vacuum at 250 °C for 24 h. The specific surface area
(SBET) was determined using BET model according to Rouquerol
recommendations.36 The micropore volume and specific surface area
of micropores were calculated using the Harkins−Jura model (t-plot
analysis).
2.2.2. IR Spectroscopic Characterization. Prior to Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) studies, the materials were
pressed into the form of self-supporting wafers (ca. 5−10 mg/cm2)
and pretreated in situ in an IR cell at 450 °C under vacuum
conditions for 1 h. Spectra were recorded with a Bruker Tensor 27
spectrometer equipped with a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT)
detector with the spectral resolution of 2 cm−1. All of the spectra
presented in this work were normalized to 10 mg of a sample. The NO
(Linde Gas 99.5%), CO (Linde Gas Poland 99.5%)
and NH3 (PRAXAIR, ≥99.8%) were used as adsorbates. Prior to
adsorption nitric oxide (Linde Gas 99.5%), was purified by the
freeze−pump−thaw technique.
2.2.3. XPS Studies. The X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were
measured on a Prevac photoelectron spectrometer equipped with a
hemispherical VG SCIENTA R3000 analyzer. The photoelectron spectra
were measured using a mono- chromatized aluminum Al Kα source (E =
1486.6 eV,11 kV, 17 mA) and a low-energy electron flood gun
(FS40A-PS) to compensate the charge on the surface of nonconductive
samples. The powder samples were pressed into indium foil and
mounted on a dedicated holder then ultra-high vacuum (UHV)
evacuated. During the measurements, the base pressure in the
analysis chamber was 5 × 10−9 mbar. The area of the sample analysis
was ∼3 mm2. The binding energy was charge- corrected to the carbon
C 1s peak at 284.6 eV. Deconvolution of the Fe 2p3/2 peak of the
catalyst was performed by fitting a Gaussian−Lorentzian (GL)
function provided through the CasaXPS software. The
Gaussian−Lorentzian ratio was fixed at 30, that is, 70% Gaussian
and 30% Lorentzian.
2.2.4. 57Fe Mossbauer Studies. Mossbauer transmission measurements
were performed using the RENON MsAa-3 spectrometer equipped with
the LND Kr-filled proportional detector and He−Ne laser-based
interferometer used to calibrate a velocity scale. A commercial
57Co(Rh) source kept at room temperature was applied for 14.41 keV
resonant transition in 57Fe. Absorber thickness was amounted to 100
mg/cm2 for both samples. Absorbers were kept at room temperature
during spectra accumulation.
2.2.5. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Studies. Before electron
paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies the samples were activated at
450 °C for 3 h under dynamic vacuum (10−4
Pa). The samples were heated with the heating rate 3 °C/min. Prior
to adsorption, nitric oxide (Linde Gas 99.5%) was purified by the
freeze−pump−thaw technique, and the NO adsorption (5 Tr) was
carried out at room temperature. After half an hour, the samples
were softly evacuated under dynamic vacuum (5 × 10−3 Pa) for 15
min. The EPR spectra were collected with Bruker ELEXSYS E500
spectrometer equipped with the Xepr data system for spectra
acquisition and manipulation, operating at X-band (9.5 GHz),
modulation frequency 100 kHz, modulation amplitude 0.2 mT, and with
microwave power 2.0 mW. Measurements for each sample were carried
out at room temperature and at −196 °C (liquid nitrogen). The g
values of the iron centers were calculated by Xepr software,
whereas a simulation procedure was used to determine the EPR
parameters of NO containing species (EPRSIM32).37
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842
2.3. Catalytic Tests. The selective catalytic reduction of NOx (NO
or NO/NO2) by NH3 was studied in a catalytic microflow reactor
operating at atmospheric pressure. An aliquot of the catalyst (24
mg) was activated in situ at 450 °C for 1 h under a flow of O2/He
(20/80, v/v) and then cooled to room temperature. The following
compositions of the gas mixture for (i) NH3−SCR of NO: [NO] = 0.1
vol %, [NH3] = 0.1 vol %, [H2O] = 3.5 vol %, [O2] = 8.0 vol % and
(ii) NH3−SCR of NOx: [NO] = 0.0542 vol %, [NO2] = 0.0458 vol %,
[NH3] = 0.1 vol %, [H2O] = 3.5 vol %, [O2] = 8.0 vol %, diluted in
pure helium were used. The weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) was
∼250 L·g−1·h−1. The SCR was carried out on programmed temperature
from 200 to 550 °C with the heating rate 6 °C· min−1. In N2O
decomposition the following conditions were applied: 75 mg of
sample, [N2O] = 1000 ppm in He, total flow rate: 75 mL/min. The
reactants and products were analyzed by a quadruple mass
spectrometer (Pfeiffer Omnistar) equipped with Channeltron and
Faraday detectors (0−200 amu) following these characteristic
masses: NO (30), N2 (14, 28), N2O (28, 30, 44), NH3 (15, 17, 18),
O2 (16,32), and H2O (17, 18).
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1. Structural and Textural
Characteristics. Figure 1
presents X-ray diffraction patterns of protonic forms of the
native BEA and the dealuminated BEA/DeAl as well as their Fe
analogues. The XRD patterns of all samples are similar in their
intensities and typical of BEA zeolite structure. Dealumination
procedure did not perturb the crystallinity of BEA/DeAl zeolite
(Table 1); there is no XRD evidence of extra lattice crystalline
phase or long-range zeolite amorphization. The diffractograms
recorded for Fe-zeolites showed that the introduction of iron
moieties into zeolite did not induce any significant changes
in
zeolitic structure. The absence of reflections originating from
extraframework iron oxo or hydroxo species points to a good
dispersion of iron moieties independent of the method of iron
deposition. Tentatively, the crystalline domains, if they exist,
might not provide the possible reflections due to low Fe
concentration. Dealuminated BEA/DeAl zeolite and both Fe analogues
are characterized by BET specific surface area and micropore volume
typical of the BEA zeolite structure, pointing to the preservation
of textural properties of BEA upon aluminum extraction procedure
and implementation of iron moieties. The Fe species deposition
slightly reduced the micropore volume values, suggesting the
location of iron species inside zeolitic micropores.
3.2. Quantification of Acidic Properties. The Fe(III) ions in
aqueous solutions are present in broad spectrum of complexes: from
single-ion aqua-complexes [Fe(H2O)6]
3+ via [Fe(H2O)5(OH)]
present as oxo-bridged [Fe2(μ-O)(H2O)8] 4+ and dioxo-bridged
[Fe2(μ-O)2(H2O)8] 4+ complexes. Thus, coexistence of isolated
Fe ions at various oxidation states, oxo- and hydroxo- complexes,
and iron oxide species in zeolites is widely reported. The
treatment of zeolite in a vacuum involves autoreduction of iron
cations, which are present at exchange sites, according to the
following equations Iron oxo-cationic species FeEX/OX
− − − − → + ++ +[OH Fe O Fe OH] 2Fe O H O2 2 2 2 (1)
Iron-isolated species FeEX/IS
O H O2 2 2 2 (2)
Both processes are, however, significantly limited for previously
calcined samples. For FexOy species, like small oxide clusters or
large aggregate iron oxides, no reduction phenomenon is expected.
Ammonia molecule is the probe widely used for quantification of
both Brønsted and Lewis sites in solid acid catalysts.38−40
Operating with the NH3−SCR reactant molecule gives the possibility
to refer the acidity measurement to the catalytic behavior.
Ligation of ammonia to acid centers leads to the appearance of the
1465−1450 cm−1 ammonium ion band and 1600−1625 cm−1 band assigned
to NH3L (L = Lewis) acid sites adducts. The concentrations of both
Brønsted (NH4
+) and Lewis (NH3L) acid sites are calculated on the basis of the
maximum intensities of the NH4
+ and NH3L bands as well as the corresponding values of the
absorption coefficients. The same methodology was employed in the
present work with applying the previously determined values of the
absorption coefficients.39 It should be underlined that the ammonia
sorption provides the overall picture of acidity but the
concentration of Lewis sites cannot be accurately referred to a
respective type of Fe-site. One of the reasons is the ligation of
various number of ammonia molecules to iron sites of different
types. Table 2 gathers the concentrations of Brønsted and
Lewis
acid sites determined in IR quantitative measurements of ammonia
sorption in both Fe-modified BEA zeolites and their H forms.
Introduction of iron cations in ion-exchange positions in zeolite
BEA was manifested by the significant reduction of the Brønsted
sites amount, while the population of Lewis acidic centers was
enhanced. At low Fe loadings, the formation of the highly dispersed
isolated FeO+ species in extraframework positions was suggested;
however, some quantity of Fe2+ ions can be also expected (eq 2).
The species of both types act as
Figure 1. XRD patterns recorded at room temperature of parent and
Fe-forms of zeolites BEA.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842
Lewis sites. In Fe-BEA the concentration of Lewis sites newly
generated by iron deposition is 120 μmol·g−1, in line with ICP
analysis. It points to a high dispersion of iron(III) extraframe-
work species. Extraframework cationic species are highly populated
in zeolites of relatively low Si/Al (<20), while clustered iron
oxides are dominant moieties in Al-poor zeolites (Si/Al >
30).41−43 Therefore, the quantity of FexOy particles is believed to
be very low in comparison with iron species present in the
ion-exchanged positions. The opposite situation is observed for
dealuminated BEA/DeAl zeolite. The extraction of aluminum atoms
from the zeolitic structure remarkably reduced its ion-exchange
ability (BEA vs BEA/DeAl); however, after iron species
implementation a greater number of Brønsted acid sites were
detected by ammonia (BEA/DeAl vs Fe-BEA/DeAl). Thus, Fe-BEA/DeAl
prepared by two-step post synthesis method is believed to
accommodate framework pseudotetrahe- dral Fe(III) species, having
significant impact on the global Brønsted acidity.35,44 The
formation of the bridging Fe3+− O(H)−Si hydroxyls was also verified
in the IR spectra in the region of the O−H stretching vibrations
(Figure 1 SI). Leaching of BEA zeolite (spectrum a) by nitric acid
solution leads to the extraction of framework aluminum and creation
of vacant T atom sites, which is confirmed by the disappearance of
the 3604 cm−1 band of the Si(OH)Al hydroxyls and the development of
a broad band of the silanol nests at 3520 cm−1
in the spectrum of BEA/DeAl zeolite (spectrum b). Upon impregnation
of BEA/DeAl with aqueous solution of Fe- (NO3)3, this band
vanishes, pointing to the involvement of Si− OH groups in silanol
nests in the reaction with Fe3+ ions (spectrum c). The
incorporation of Fe3+ cations into the framework of BEA/DeAl is
directly evidenced by the appearance of an IR band at 3636 cm−1,
attributed to the Fe3+−O(H)−Si acidic sites. The Fe species not
involved in creation of protonic acidity in Fe-BEA/DeAl (50
μmol·g−1) bear the form of extraframework Lewis acid sites, that
is, oxides of Fe(II) or Fe(III). 3.3. Speciation of Iron Species.
3.3.1. XPS Investiga-
tions. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy is a versatile surface
analysis tool widely used for qualitative evaluation of iron
oxidation states. The iron 2p core levels are split into 2p3/2 and
2p1/2 doublets due to the spin−orbit coupling. The Fe 2p3/2 and Fe
2p1/2 peaks were found to be centered at ca. 712.7 and 725.9 eV
(Figure 2). Deconvolution of Fe 2p3/2 peaks revealed the presence
of the band at 712.3 and 714.2 eV. Both components were attributed
to the Fe(III) species.45 It is worth
noticing that Fe 2p3/2 lines of the doublets on the high BE side of
the Fe 2p photoelectron peaks (714.2 and 714.5 eV) exhibit BE
higher than 712 eV. Many metal cations embedded in zeolite matrix
were found to exhibit higher BE compared with their BE in oxides45
due to their specific interactions with the zeolite framework. In
our case the higher BE for Fe(III) might also reflect the
occurrence of highly isolated species. Taking into account the
information derived from XPS investigations and 57Fe Mossbauer
spectroscopy (further discussed in Section 3.3.2), the Fe(III)
species in pseudotetrahedral surroundings can be identified in
Fe-BEA/DeAl as the main component of the Fe 2p3/2 peak at 712.3 eV.
For Fe-BEA zeolite the isolated Fe(III) species in the
ion-exchanged positions are present as the only species. These data
are in line with the results delivered by IR investigations, where
for Fe-BEA/DeAl the enhanced Brønsted acidity was attributed to
Fe(III) ions grafted into framework T-positons, that is, the
Fe3+−O(H)− Si acidic sites.
3.3.2. 57Fe Mossbauer and EPR Studies. Not only the complex nature
of Fe(III) species but also their high reactivity are significant
limitations for their evaluation in both qualitative and
quantitative manners. For instance, the unequivocal attribution of
IR bands appearing upon sorption of NO and CO to Fe(III) sites
still remains a major issue of debate. Thus, the speciation of iron
in zeolites studied was assessed in 57Fe Mossbauer and EPR studies.
The 57Fe Mossbauer spectra of zeolites were collected at
room temperature, and their fitted parameters are shown in Figure 3
and listed in Table 3. For high-spin Fe complexes
Table 1. Chemical Composition Obtained from ICP Analysisa
sample name Si/Al Fe/Al FeICP (μmol·g−1) % cryst Stotal (m 2·g−1)
Smeso (m
2·g−1) Vmicro (cm 3·g−1)
BEA 22 100 567 44 0.19 BEA/DeAl 250 89 609 55 0.23 Fe-BEA 22 0.20
135 98 515 40 0.17 Fe-BEA/DeAl 500 6.74 155 88 559 52 0.19
aRelative crystallinity values (% cryst) derived from XRD and
textural parameters of native zeolites and their Fe forms.
Table 2. Concentrations of Fe and Al Determined by ICP
Analysisa
sample name FeICP (μmol·g −1) AlICP (μmol·g−1) B (μmol·g−1) L
(μmol·g−1)
BEA 675 400 225 Fe-BEA 135 670 165 345 BEA/DeAl 28 45 0 Fe-BEA/DeAl
155 23 102 50
aThe concentrations of Brønsted (B) and Lewis (L) acid sites
determined in quantitative IR studies of ammonia sorption in
investigated zeolites.
Figure 2. XPS spectra of Fe-BEA and Fe-BEA/DeAl.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842
High octahedral coordination symmetry can be provoked by the
ligation of water molecules to extraframework iron species.
Contrarily, in Fe-BEA/DeAl sample, ∼30 at % of iron atoms
with IS = 0.18 mm/s is tetrahedrally coordinated. A correlation
between line width and electric quadrupole splitting indicates that
distributions of the quadrupole splitting occur in these
materials.48 The average value of quadrupole splitting is larger in
Fe-BEA/DeAl sample in comparison with Fe-BEA. Thus, this sample has
more surface iron atoms interacting with the walls of the zeolite
channel. This is an indication that iron species are more dispersed
for the Fe-BEA/DeAl sample in comparison with Fe-BEA. We believed
that these tetrahedral Fe(III) species are situated in vacant T
atom sites producing the bridging Fe3+−O(H)−Si hydroxyls in BEA
matrix, in line with literature reports.49
Correspondingly, the information on nature of iron species in
calcined samples was derived from EPR studies. Before EPR
measurements the samples were treated under vacuum, and thus the
water molecules previously attached to iron species were
effectively removed. Figure 4 presents the EPR spectra of Fe-BEA
and Fe-BEA/DeAl registered at RT and −196 °C. The observed signals
are due to Fe3+ ions surrounded by oxygen ligand with high spin
configuration and ground state 6S5/2; therefore, the main features
in EPR spectra are determined by the zero field splitting. In all
spectra the signal at geff ≈ 4.3 (denoted FeA) is present and was
assigned to oxygen-
surrounded Fe3+ ions in the strong rhombically distorted
tetrahedral symmetry localized in framework and extraframe- work
position50−56 or in small (nanometric) oxides species.57
This signal arises from transition within the middle Kramers
doublet. In the case of Fe-BEA, two signals at geff ≈ 5.8 (FeB1)
and ∼6.3 (FeB2) are clearly visible, particularly at spectra
registered at −196 °C (Figure 4B). The similar but not resolved
line at geff ≈ 6 (FeB) can be identified in the EPR spectrum of
Fe-BEA/DeAl. These signals are due to transition within the lowest
Kramer doublet and can be qualified as easily accessible (vide
infra), therefore, reactive penta- or hexacoordi- nated Fe3+ ions
in extraframework positions exhibiting axially distorted higher
than tetrahedral symmetry (possibly octahedral with strong
tetrahedral distortion).23,25,55,57 The observed line is a
perpendicular component of highly anisotropic spectrum with g⊥ ∼ 6
(not resolved gx and gy), whereas parallel g component (g ≈ ge ≈ 2)
is not visible due to broadening of the line.52,55,58,59,60 Apart
from the above-described signals, the EPR spectrum of Fe-BEA/DeAl
contains two additional lines in the region of g > 4.3, not
present in the case of Fe-BEA. These signals at geff ≈ 5 (FeC) and
geff≈ 8.3 (FeD) might be due to another type of distortion of the
originally tetrahedral center, as suggested by Bordiga et al.60 The
finding is in line with Mossbauer results, which indicate the
presence of tetrahedrally coordinated Fe3+ in the Fe-BEA/DeAl
zeolite. Additionally, in high magnetic field region, two main
signals are visible, characterized by geff ≈ 2.3 (FeE) and giso ≈
2.0 (FeF). The intensity of very broad signal at geff ∼ 2.3,
clearly visible in spectra registered at RT, decreases when
experiments were
Figure 3. 57Fe Mossbauer spectra recorded for Fe-BEA and Fe-BEA/
DeAl after evacuation at 450 °C for 1 h. Spectra recorded at room
temperature.
Table 3. Hyperfine Parameters Derived from the Room-Temperature
57Fe Mossbauer Spectra for Studied Fe-Zeolitesa
57Fe Mossbauer data EPR data
sample name A [%] ± 5% IS (mm/s) QS (mm/s) Γ (mm/s) attribution of
Fe species g factor attribution of Fe species
Fe-BEA bare Fe(II) not visible 22 0.36 0.58 0.22 [Fe(III)O]+,
Fe(III)−μO2−Fe(III), Oh g⊥ ∼ 6 g ≈ 2 FeB 42 0.35 0.94 0.29 36 0.35
1.35 0.40
Fe-BEA/DeAl 30 0.18 0.5 0.6 Fe(III), Td geff ≈ 5 FeC 44 0.38 0.9
0.6 [Fe(III)O]+, Fe(III)−μO2−Fe(III), Oh g⊥ ∼ 6 g ≈ 2 FeB 26 0.39
1.9 1.1 Fe(III) oligomers, Oh geff ≈ 2.3 FeE
aThe symbol A denotes relative contribution of the particular
sub-spectrum, IS stands for the isomer (total) shift of the
particular sub-spectrum versus room temperature α-Fe, QS denotes
the absolute value of the quadrupole splitting, while the symbol Γ
stands for the absorber line width.
Figure 4. EPR spectra of Fe-BEA and Fe-BEA/DeAl registered at RT
(a) and −196 °C(b).
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842
performed at −196 °C; that means this line does not follow Curie’s
law. The phenomenon can be rationalized by assuming mutual magnetic
interaction of neighboring Fe3+ ions, and the signal can be
assigned to FexOy particles on the external surface of
zeolite.53,55,56 The g factor of the last signal was determined by
spectrum simulation by assuming sharp isotropic line with ΔB = 0.5
± 0.1 mT and giso = 2.0025 ± 0.0005. The line with g ∼ 2 is often
attributed to isolated Fe(III) ions in high symmetrical octahedral
(or tetrahedral) environment;60−62
however, the very small line width leads to the suggestion that
this line is due to lattice defect (Si−O+−Al) generated by thermal
treatment.56,63
3.3.3. IR Studies of Carbon Monoxide Sorption. As previously
mentioned, the information on the amount of iron species derived
from ammonia adsorption IR studies is not conclusive with regard to
the nature of iron cations. The electron-acceptor properties of
redox sites are usually evaluated in CO and NO sorption
experiments. Thus both probes were employed to investigate the
speciation of iron in investigated zeolites. The spectra of CO
adsorbed at −100 °C on studied zeolites are presented in Figure 5A.
Hydrogen bonding of CO
molecules to the Al−O(H)−Si acid groups led to the appearance of
the 2177 cm−1 band. The band at 2173 cm−1
frequency can also be easily distinguished in the spectrum of CO
adsorbed on Fe-BEA/DeAl zeolite. Usually this band is assigned to
CO polarized by the bridging zeolite Fe3+− O(H)−Si hydroxyls for
zeolites prepared by two-step post- synthesis procedure.35 Because
of the fact that the Fe3+− O(H)−Si groups are slightly less acidic
than their Al− O(H)−Si analogues, they are represented by the CO
band of lower frequency. In the region of the O−H stretching
vibrations the latter species are represented by the 3636
cm−1
band (Figure 1, SI), which is consumed upon CO admission producing
the 2173 cm−1 CO band.35 The enhanced Brønsted acidity of the
Fe-BEA/DeAl over BEA/DeAl (Section 3.2) also
evidences the formation of the bridging acidic groups of the
Fe3+−O(H)−Si type. Nevertheless, the participation of the
Al−O(H)−Si groups in the 2173 cm−1 band cannot be excluded. The
other bands originating from the interaction of probe with
hydroxyls species are the 2163 and 2155 cm−1
bands typical of CO bonded to silanol groups. The rest of the bands
characterized by high frequencies were assigned to carbonyls formed
by ligation of CO to electron-acceptor Lewis sites. The 2199 cm−1
band was ascribed to carbonyls formed with extraframework aluminum
(EFAl) species, which were also found in BEA as the result of its
lowered thermal stability. The presence of electron-acceptor Al
sites was confirmed in quantitative IR studies of ammonia sorption
(Section 3.2). The bands at 2190 and 2183 cm−1 were qualified as
the iron(II) carbonyls Fe2+(CO). The 2190 cm−1 band was
unquestionably assigned to Fe2+(CO) monocarbonyls formed by the
exchangeable isolated Fe2+ cations. The lower frequency band at
2183 cm−1 can be attributed to Fe2+ cations issued from iron in
oxo-forms. Zecchina et al.60 has assigned the band at 2180 cm−1 to
CO adsorption on small iron oxide clusters in H- [Fe]ZSM-5. As
mentioned above, the treatment of the catalysts in situ at 450 °C
under vacuum involves autoreduction of iron oxo-cationic species
FeEX/OX (eq 1) and iron-isolated species FeEX/IS (eq 2), while
small oxide clusters or large aggregate iron oxide FexOy are not
supposed to be reduced. The mechanism of the SCR of NO by NH3 is
believed to involve the Fe2+/Fe3+
redox cycle, and the Fe(III)-oxo species are considered as the
sites providing the catalytic activity in the reduction of NOx by
ammonia. Thus, the number of Fe2+ species detected with CO can be
related to the easily reduced FeO+ moieties, which can deliver high
activity in SCR of NO by NH3. The Fe(III) species were reported to
be not detectable with
CO.35,44 Thus, only the concentrations of Fe2+ cations (Table 4) in
the form of the exchangeable cations (Fe2+) and the oxo-
−
tetrahedral (Si/Al = 500 for Fe-BEA/DeAl) favor the hydrolysis
process, finally resulting in oxide forms with different extents of
dispersion. This process occurs at elevated temperatures, that is,
during thermal pretreatment of TMI-exchanged zeolites, and ensures
the neutralization of AlO4
− tetrahedra by protons, while the majority of the TMIs are present
in the oxide forms (eqs 1 and 2); however, the Fe2+ species
concentration corresponds to
Figure 5. Maximum intensities of monocarbonyl (A) and mono-
nitrosyl bands (B) formed in Fe-BEA and Fe-BEA/DeAl.
Table 4. Concentration of the Divalent Fe Moieties Derived from
Both ICP Analysis (FeICP) and the Quantitative IR Studies of CO and
NO Sorption (Fe2+IR)
Fe2+IR (μmol g−1)
CO
sample name FeICP (μmol g−1) Fe2+ Fe2+OXO ΣFe NO
Fe-BEA 135 10 5 15 20 Fe-BEA/DeAl 155 0 10 10 12
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842
the number of Fe(III) species being easily reduced under vacuum
conditions. 3.3.4. Interaction of Iron Species with Nitrogen
Monoxide.
Sorption of nitrogen monoxide, that is, NH3−SCR reactant molecule,
also provides valuable information on the status of iron species in
zeolites and can allow referring the speciation of iron to the
catalytic behavior of studied materials. Unquestion- able advantage
of the use of NO as probe is the possibility of the IR quantitative
analysis of the Fe2+ cations in zeolite matrix.42 Similarly as for
CO, the sorption of nitrogen monoxide delivered information on the
amount of Fe2+ sites resulted from the treatment of zeolite in
vacuum and reduction of Fe(III)-oxo centers with NO. It is a
consensus that the mono- and dinitrosyls are formed
solely on Fe2+ ions. Some authors,44,51 however, reported the
Fe3+(NO) nitrosyl bands at 1885−1880 cm−1 frequencies. In our case,
consecutive sorption of NO doses led to the saturation of all Fe2+
cations with NO, which was observed as the maximum intensities of
Fe2+(NO) mononitrosyls of the 1885−1837 cm−1 bands (Figure 5B). The
IR spectra were recorded immediately upon the NO introduction to
reduce the extent of the NO transformation into N2 and
oxo-compounds of nitrogen in oxidation states +3 and +5. Because
several bands of mononitrosyl species were distinguished for Fe-BEA
(1885, 1865, and 1846 cm−1) and Fe-BEA/DeAl (1863, 1837, and 1810
cm−1) (Figure 5B), the Fe2+(NO) bands were subjected to
deconvolution analysis. The Fe2+ sites concentration (Table 4) was
calculated on the basis of the bands representative for maximum
intensities of Fe2+(NO) mononitrosyls and their absorption
coefficient (13.80 ± 0.06 cm/μmol).42 For both Fe- BEA and
Fe-BEA/DeAl the mononitrosyl Fe2+(NO) concen- tration was
noticeably higher than the amount of Fe2+(CO) monocarbonyls adducts
formed upon CO sorption. It suggests high reactivity of Fe(III)-oxo
centers toward reduction with NO to Fe2+ cations. A similar
conclusion can be derived when NO sorption is followed by EPR
spectroscopy. After adsorption of NO in Fe-BEA, a new EPR signal
with geff ≈ 4.0 (FeNOA) appeared (Figure 6). This signal is due to
the interaction of the isolated Fe2+ ions with NO molecules.52,64
The Fe2+−NO adduct can actually be considered as [Fe3+−NO−] complex
with S = 3/2, where a strong antiferromagnetic interaction resulted
from an electron transfer from Fe2+ to NO. On the contrary, the
signal from isolated Fe2+ cations species was not
present in a EPR spectrum of Fe-BEA/DeAl, in line with CO sorption
IR studies. Besides the FeNOA signal, three lines assigned to FeNOB
sites
are easily noticed in both samples (Figures 6 and 7). The
FeNOB signal can be simulated with the following parameters, gxx =
2.094 ± 0.001, ΔB = 0.16 ± 0.01 mT; gyy = 2.058 ± 0.001, ΔB = 0.13
± 0.01 mT; and gzz = 2.015 ± 0.001, ΔB = 0.13 ± 0.01 mT (Figure 7),
and finally be assigned to defect iron site interacting with three
NO molecules forming S = 1/2 complex (Fe2+−(O/OH)−Fe2+) (NO3)
([Fe(NO)3]
9 using the Ene- mark−Feltham notation65).66 For Fe-BEA/DeAl sample
the signal is similar to that described above, but the spectrum is
weaker and lines are broader. The simulation points to a
superposition of three signals denoted on the Figure 7 as C1, C2,
and C3. The signals C1 and C2 have roughly the same intensity.
Because the C1 was simulated with g values similar to the ones used
for simulation of the signal from FeNOB, it was also attributed to
[Fe(NO)3] species despite the wider line. The second spectrum is
characterized by gxx = 2.067 ± 0.001, ΔB = 0.27 ± 0.01 mT; gyy =
2.038 ± 0.001, ΔB = 0.24 ± 0.01 mT; and gzz = 1.990 ± 0.001 ΔB =
0.25 ± 0.01 mT parameters and might also be attributed to
(Fe2+−(O/OH)−Fe2+) (NO3) species characterized by slightly
different symmetry of the center. According to our best knowledge
the presence of the signal characterized by such parameters has
been not reported until now. This weak and ill-defined EPR signal
and the absence of the signal at geff ≈ 4.0 indicate negligibly low
concentration of Fe2+ ions in Fe-BEA/DeAl after NO adsorption. The
last center, C3, is identical to previously described FeF signal
and is due to lattice defect (Si−O+−Al). Additionally, adsorption
of nitric oxide resulted in disappearance of the signals around g ∼
6 in all of the cases, pointing to coordinative unsaturation of
these iron sites and indicating that these sites determine the
catalytic activity. In IR studies besides the formation of the
isolated Fe2+
cations, the transformation of nitrogen monoxide over catalysts
also evidenced the production of nitrate species in both catalysts
(Figure 8). With time, the bands typical of N2O (2224 cm−1) and
nitrates (1620 and 1580 cm−1) started to develop more significantly
for Fe-BEA material (Figure 6). The NO+
ions are also observed as the product of the transformation of NO.
Typically, nitrosonium ion in zeolites is detected at 2135 cm−1.35
Indeed, the band at the same frequency was detected
Figure 6. EPR spectra of Fe-BEA and Fe-BEA/DeAl before (a) and
after NO adsorption (b) registered at −196 °C.
Figure 7. Experimental and simulated EPR spectra of Fe-BEA and Fe-
BEA/DeAl after NO adsorption registered at −196 °C.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842
for zeolite Fe-BEA. For Fe-BEA/DeAl a negligible intensity band of
NO+ ion can be found at 2175 cm−1, pointing to the higher basicity
of the oxygen-bridging Fe and Si in Fe3+− O(H)−Si groups than their
Al−O(H)−Si analogues. In summary, the diverse population of
framework Al
provokes the differentiation in Fe dispersion in Fe-BEA and
Fe-BEA/DeAl. In both zeolites the mononuclear Fe(III) species are
present. In Fe-BEA such moieties are solely of the extraframework
nature. In contrast, for Fe-BEA/DeAl, a noticeable amount of
Fe(III) is believed to be grafted in zeolite framework, while the
nongrafted species can be considered as the extraframework sites.
High reducibility of Fe(III) oxo-species was confirmed in EPR and
IR studies of NO adsorption. As revealed by IR spectroscopy, the
higher amounts of nitrate species were formed in Fe-BEA, that is,
zeolite accommodating extraframework mononuclear FeO+
entities as the major species. This Fe2+/Fe3+ redox cycle is
crucial for the mechanism of the SCR of NO by NH3. 3.4. Catalytic
Performance. The obtained zeolite
materials were tested as catalysts for SCR of NO with ammonia into
N2 and H2O according to the following main reaction (eq 3)51
+ + → +4NO 4NH O 4N 6H O standard SCR3 2 2 2 (3)
Nitrogen is the desired product of this process, while also the
formation of N2O is possible according to the reaction (eq 4)
+ + → +4NO 4NH 3O 4N O 6H O3 2 2 2 (4)
The results of the catalytic studies performed on Fe-BEA and
Fe-BEA/DeAl zeolites and their protonic analogues are presented in
Figure 9. The reference zeolites without iron were not
catalytically active in the NO conversion up to 450 °C; at higher
temperature NO conversion did not exceed 20% in both cases.
Deposition of iron(III) species in BEA and BEA/ DeAl resulted in
their activation in NH3−SCR process. The
data clearly show the higher activity of Fe-BEA over Fe-BEA/ DeAl.
The activity of Fe-BEA zeolite is characterized by a complete NO
conversion at 450 °C. Only a small amount of N2O was detected in
the temperature range of 250−400 °C, and it was reduced in the
higher temperature range. On the other side, lower catalytic
activity was reported over Fe-BEA/ DeAl with only 83% NO conversion
at 550 °C. The NH3 conversion curves were close to the NO
conversion curves for all catalysts, providing the excellent
selectivity, as shown in eq 3. The obtained samples have been also
studied as catalysts for
the fast NH3−SCR of NOx (eq 5).
+ + → +NO NO 2NH 2N 3H O fast SCR2 3 2 2 (5)
Figure 10 presents the conversions of NOx, NO, NO2, and NH3 and the
formation of N2O in the fast SCR reaction with NO2/NO = 0.85 over
iron-forms of zeolites BEA and BEA/ DeAl. The presence of NO2 in
the feed significantly increased the NOx conversions for tested
samples; however, even in fast SCR the Fe-BEA catalysts still
showed higher NOx conversion than the other system. The formation
of N2O increased for both Fe-BEA and Fe-BEA/DeAl. The Fe-BEA gave
the highest N2O production with a maximum concentration of about 22
ppm at ∼341 °C (N2O/N2 selectivity = 2.3%/97.7%). The N2O
decomposition catalytic studies were also
completed (Figure 11). The reaction started at about 350− 370 °C
and N2O conversion increased with reaction temper- ature. The BEA
zeolites without iron species dispersed delivered poor catalytic
activity: The N2O conversion was found to be below 8% in the whole
temperature range. The Fe- BEA catalyst offered significantly
higher catalytic activity in the process of N2O decomposition:
Above 60% of N2O conversion was achieved at 450 °C, while at ∼525
°C the N2O conversion reached above 95%. Dealuminated Fe-BEA/DeAl
catalyst was noticeably less active than Fe-BEA in N2O
decomposition: The N2O conversion reached 40% at temperature as
high as 550 °C.
4. DISCUSSION
The tailoring of zeolitic catalyst activity requires us to take
into account several factors, including: (i) type of zeolite
structure, (ii) speciation and amount of introduced iron species
into zeolite structure, as well as (iii) zeolite acidity. Tailoring
of the properties of the catalysts by the implementation of iron
species of desired type and quantity is still an open problem. In
the literature, there is no general agreement on the method that is
most suitable to obtain highly active and stable NH3−SCR zeolitic
catalysts. What is more, the comparison of the results for
different catalysts is problematic, as they were obtained from
studies performed in different laboratories under different
Figure 8. IR spectra (nitrosyl stretching region) of Fe-zeolites
collected at RT after 30 min of contact time with adsorbed
NO.
Figure 9. Results of activity tests for NH3−SCR of NO (24 mg of the
catalyst, [NO] = 0.1 vol %, [NH3] = 0.1 vol %, [H2O] = 3.5 vol %,
[O2] = 8.0 vol %, WHSV = 250 l·g−1·h−1) performed over
Fe-catalysts. The dotted lines represent the conversion of NO for
the native BEA and BEA/DeAl.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842
conditions. Nevertheless, there is common agreement that the
activity in the NH3−SCR of NO reaction is exclusively connected
with the exchanged positively charged Fe species balanced by the
zeolite negative framework and not with any supported Fe.61 The
examples of iron-modified zeolites for NH3−SCR of NO reported in
the scientific literature are presented in previous
studies.62
In this work, an influence of speciation of iron introduced into
BEA zeolites on their catalytic performance in both standard and
fast NH3−SCR was examined. Iron was introduced into support using
ion-exchange and post-synthesis techniques. Spectroscopic studies
revealed that the speciation of iron sites was strongly dependent
on the catalyst preparation. The ion-exchange procedure allowed
incorporating iron as cationic species either isolated or bridged
through an oxygen atom (iron oxo cations), while the sample
prepared by post- synthesis method accommodated a high proportion
of iron substituted for aluminum in the zeolite lattice. In the
latter case, iron oxide clusters deposited on outer surface also
were found. According to Schmidt et al.,67 an Fe2+/Fe3+ redox cycle
is involved in the mechanism of the SCR of NO by NH3, and the
Fe(III)-oxo species were suggested to be the active sites in the
reduction of NOx by ammonia. The comparison between Fe- BEA and
other iron-modified zeolites, that is, Fe-ZSM-5, Fe- MOR, and
Fe-ZSM-12, revealed its superior catalytic activity.15,68,69 Boron
et al.18,19,69 widely studied Fe-BEA in the NH3−SCR of NO and found
that the framework pseudotetrahedral Al−O(H)−Si and Fe−O(H)−Si
sites have influenced the catalytic properties of the studied
catalysts. The catalytic activity of our catalysts in both standard
and
fast SCR is believed to also be ruled by the concentration of
Fe(III)-oxo species. The studies of NO adsorption confirmed the
presence of highly reactive Fe(III)-oxo species being able to
oxidize NO even at room temperature, as revealed by IR and
EPR investigations. The NO oxidation was more efficient for zeolite
Fe-BEA, which provided extraframework iron oxo- cations as the only
species. Zeolite with Fe(III) cations in the framework
pseudotetrahedral positions was found to be less effective. This
different reducibility of Fe(III) centers reflects their different
structure. Wichterlova et al.43 have shown that mononuclear
Fe(III)-oxo species are more pronounced to be reduced to Fe(II)
than dinuclear [(Fe(III)−μO2−Fe(III)]2+ complexes. The framework
Fe−O(H)−Si sites were found to be the most resistant to the
reduction. The high reactivity and thus low stability of FeO+ are
supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations.70 In our
case the lability of oxygen in iron(III) oxo-complexes was
determined in the decomposition of N2O. It has been nicely
presented in the works of Wichterlova et al. (ref 43 and references
therein) that some information on the nature of the iron active
site can be delivered by the comparison of the catalysts activity
in both processes because both processes require the opposite Fe
redox cycles. The N2O decomposition can be described in simplified
terms as follows
+ * → +N O N O2 2 (6)
* →2O O2 (7)
The second step (eq 7) is the determining one; therefore, the rate
of decomposition of N2O is a function of the concentration of
labile oxygens and thus the reducibility of the catalysts. High
activity of zeolite Fe-BEA in N2O decomposition points to
accommodation of easily reducible Fe(III) moieties that can be
transformed into Fe(II) species balanced by zeolitic framework. In
line with the spectroscopic results (XPS, EPR, Mossbauer, and IR
studies) the zeolite Fe-BEA/DeAl possesses the pseudotetrahedral
Fe(III) in framework positions and extra- framework FexOy species
noticeably less prone to reduction, and thus they did not deliver
catalytic activity. Indeed, a vital issue in standard and fast SCR
is the
production of N2O (contributing to the greenhouse effect and
destruction of the ozone layer). The formation of N2O in the fast
SCR was already widely recognized over Fe-ZSM-5,71,72
but only a few studies have investigated the SCR performance and
the formation of N2O in fast SCR over Fe-BEA.16 The formation of
N2O is a critical issue for commercial application of catalyst;
however, it is worth noting that the diesel exhaust gases contain
>90% of NO and >10% NO2. The main routes were suggested for
nitrous oxide formation over Fe-modified zeolites resulting from
(i) the formation of surface species like ammonium nitrate (e.g.,
NH4NO3) and its subsequent decomposition (eq 8)71,73
→ +NH NO N O 2H O4 3 2 2 (8)
Figure 10. Results of activity tests for NH3−SCR of NO/NO2 (24 mg
of the catalyst, [NO] = 0.0542 vol %, [NO2] = 0.0458%, [NH3] = 0.1
vol %, [H2O] = 3.5 vol %, [O2] = 8.0 vol %, WHSV = 250 l·g−1·h−1)
performed over Fe catalysts.
Figure 11. N2O conversion in N2O decomposition on Fe-BEA and Fe-
BEA/DeAl (75 mg of the catalyst, [N2O] = 1000 ppm in He, total flow
rate: 75 mL/min).
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842
(ii) the reaction of NO2 with intermediate nitrites (eq 9)
− + + → → + ++ +NO (NH ) NO 1 2
O ... 2N O 3H O 2H2 4 2 2 2 2 2
(9)
(iii) NO2−SCR reaction (eq 10)71
+ → + +2NO 2NH N N O 3H O2 3 2 2 2 (10)
As evidenced, IR studies of ammonia adsorption of both zeolites
accommodate a certain amount of Brønsted acid sites that provide
NH4
+ ions as active species. Also, transformation of nitrogen monoxide
over catalysts, followed by IR spectros- copy, evidenced the
formation of nitrate species in significant amounts (Figure 6). On
the basis of this indications, we propose that NH4NO3 was formed
and deposited on the catalysts surface, whereas at 250 °C its
decomposition occurred, resulting in the formation of N2O. In both
standard and fast NH3−SCR, Fe-BEA revealed enhanced activity. A
large difference was observed between Fe-BEA and Fe-BEA/DeAl in
NH3−SCR of NO, while the selectivity toward N2 remained close to
100% for both catalysts; however, the catalytic tests showed the
presence of N2O as byproduct, and the N2O profiles for both
zeolites differ significantly. Over Fe-BEA, N2O appeared at ∼250 °C
and with higher concentration than over Fe-BEA/DeAl. The
concentration of N2O increases in the fast NH3−SCR, together with
enhanced NO2 conversion than the NO conversion. Usually, the
ability of the catalysts in N2O production is correlated with the
acidic characteristic. Shi et al.74 have reported good activity in
fast SCR and higher formation of N2O over hydrothermally aged
catalyst, that is, with lower concentration of Brønsted acid sites
than over fresh one. Contrarily, the Brønsted acid sites were
suggested to accelerate decomposition of NH4NO2.
75−77 The presence of Brønsted acid sites strongly accelerated the
fast SCR over isolated Fe oxo-sites. Recent studies of
Brandenberger et al.78,79
have shown that Brønsted acid sites are not required for high SCR
activity, but acidity might influence iron dispersion. Shwan et
al.80 reported that the storage of ammonia in HBEA zeolite
proceeded on two zeolite sites representing weak and strong
Brønsted acid sites, while NO could adsorb only on Brønsted acid
sites. Furthermore, the oxidation of NH3 and NO and the NH3−SCR
reaction are assumed to proceed with the participation of the
Brønsted acid sites. Monomeric and dimeric iron cations as well as
more clustered iron oxide particles were considered with regard to
SCR activity. In low- temperature SCR, both NH3 and NO adsorb on
monomeric iron species, which is assumed to deliver the highest
catalytic activity. Dimeric iron species were reported to provide
the activity for high-temperature SCR and NH3 oxidation. Iron
particles, Fe2O3, are not active for NH3−SCR but for oxidation of
NO. Other researchers confirmed that both Brønsted acid sites
and added iron oxides are essential for high performance in NH3−SCR
of NO over Fe-ZSM-581 as well as Fe-BEA.15,69
Indeed, there is still significant controversy concerning the
nature of acidity effect on the catalytic performance. The acid
strength of Al−O(H)−Si and Fe−O(H)−Si sites evaluated in low
temperature CO sorption studies, followed by IR spectroscopy, has
evidenced significantly lower strength of the latter species.67
Also, in our studies Fe-BEA/DeAl showed a smaller downshift of the
bridging hydroxyls band due to hydrogen bonding of CO molecule
(ΔνOH···CO = 289 cm−1) for than Fe-BEA (ΔνOH···CO = 325 cm−1);
spectra are not shown. A
higher acidity of sample prepared by ion-exchange is due to the
presence of Al−O(H)−Si groups, providing the protonic sites of
significantly higher strength. The analysis of the catalytic tests
revealed higher catalytic activity of Fe-BEA in both standard and
fast SCR. Therefore, it could be concluded that vital population of
highly acidic Al-originated sites (Al atoms in the zeolite
structure) enhances the catalytic activity.
5. CONCLUSIONS Fe-BEA and Fe-BEA/DeAl were found to be active
catalysts in both standard and fast NH3−SCR in the presence of
water vapor. The catalytic activity was strongly affected by iron
speciation. EPR and IR studies revealed the presence of isolated or
bridged species through an oxygen atom in zeolite Fe-BEA. These
highly dispersed extraframework iron oxo-sites were found to be
more easily reduced and thus more catalytically efficient than the
iron oxo-sites in tetrahedral framework positions in Fe-BEA/DeAl.
Additionally, for such catalyst significantly higher acidity than
for Fe-BEA/DeAl was evidenced by IR adsorption of NH3 and CO. The
formation of N2O is a major drawback of the addition of NO2 into
the feed to enhance the NOx conversion over both catalysts. Both
high population and high strength of Brønsted enhanced the
catalytic activity.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT *S Supporting Information The Supporting
Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications
website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692.
IR spectra of studied samples in the region of O−H stretching
vibrations revealing the extraction of frame- work aluminum and
creation of vacant T atom sites in dealuminated zeolite BEA/DeAl
and the formation of the bridging Fe3+−O(H)−Si hydroxyls upon
impreg- nation of BEA/DeAl with aqueous solution of Fe(NO3)3.
(PDF)
AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author *E-mail:
[email protected]. Tel: +48 12 663 20 81. Fax: +48 12 634
0515. Author Contributions The manuscript was written through
contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to
the final version of the manuscript. Notes The authors declare no
competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was financed by Grant No.
2015/18/E/ST4/00191 from the National Science Centre, Poland.
REFERENCES (1) Forzatti, P. Present Status and Perspectives in
De-NOx SCR Catalysis. Appl. Catal., A 2001, 222, 221−236. (2)
Busca, G.; Lietti, L.; Ramis, G.; Berti, F. Chemical and
Mechanistic Aspects of the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by
Ammonia over Oxide Catalysts: A Review. Appl. Catal., B 1998, 18,
1− 36. (3) Kapteijn, F.; Rodriguez-Mirasol, J.; Moulijn, J. A.
Heterogeneous Catalytic Decomposition of Nitrous Oxide. Appl.
Catal., B 1996, 9, 25−64.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842
(4) Enderle, C.; Vent, G.; Paule, M. BLUETEC Diesel Technology-
Clean, Efficient and Powerful; SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191, 2008.
(5) Grossale, A.; Nova, I.; Tronconi, E. Study of a
Fe−zeolite-based System as NH3-SCR Catalyst for Diesel Exhaust
Aftertreatment. Catal. Today 2008, 136, 18−27. (6) Bosch, H.;
Janssen, F. Formation and Control of Nitrogen Oxides. Catal. Today
1988, 2, 369−379. (7) Heck, R. M. Catalytic Abatement of Nitrogen
Oxides − Stationary Applications. Catal. Today 1999, 53, 519−523.
(8) Byrne, J. W.; Chen, J. M.; Speronello, B. K. Selective
Catalytic Reduction of NOx Using Zeolitic Catalysts for High
Temperature Applications. Catal. Today 1992, 13, 33−42. (9) Feng,
X.; Keith Hall, W. FeZSM-5: A Durable SCR Catalyst for NOx Removal
from Combustion Streams. J. Catal. 1997, 166, 368− 376. (10) Long,
R. Q.; Yang, R. T. Catalytic Performance of Fe−ZSM-5 Catalysts for
Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide by Ammonia. J. Catal.
1999, 188, 332−339. (11) Sjovall, H.; Olsson, L.; Fridell, E.;
Blint, R. J. Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 over
Cu-ZSM-5 The Effect of Changing the Gas Composition. Appl. Catal.,
B 2006, 64, 180−188. (12) Huang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Lambert, C.
Deactivation of Cu/zeolite SCR Catalyst due to Reductive
Hydrothermal Aging. SAE International Journal of Fuels and
Lubricants 2009, 1, 466−470. (13) Delahay, G.; Mauvezin, M.; Coq,
B.; Kieger, S. Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitrous Oxide by
Ammonia on Iron Zeolite Beta Catalysts in an Oxygen Rich
Atmosphere: Effect of Iron Contents. J. Catal. 2001, 202, 156−162.
(14) Kieger, S.; Delahay, G.; Coq, B. Influence of Co-Cations in
the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO by NH3 over Copper
Exchanged Faujasite Zeolites. Appl. Catal., B 2000, 25, 1−9. (15)
Frey, A. M.; Mert, S.; Due-Hansen, J.; Fehrmann, R.; Christensen,
C. H. Fe-BEA Zeolite Catalysts for NH3-SCR of NOx. Catal. Lett.
2009, 130, 1−8. (16) Balle, P.; Geiger, B.; Kureti, S. Selective
Catalytic Reduction of NOx by NH3 on Fe/HBEA Zeolite Catalysts in
Oxygen-rich Exhaust. Appl. Catal., B 2009, 85, 109−119. (17) Balle,
P.; Geiger, B.; Klukowski, D.; Pignatelli, M.; Wohnrau, S.; Menzel,
M.; Zirkwa, I.; Brunklaus, G.; Kureti, S. Study of the Selective
Catalytic Reduction of NOx on an Efficient Fe/HBEA Zeolite Catalyst
for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines. Appl. Catal., B 2009, 91, 587−595.
(18) Boron , P.; Chmielarz, L.; Gurgul, J.; tka, K.; Gil, B.;
Krafft, J.- M.; Dzwigaj, S. The Influence of the Preparation
Procedures on the Catalytic Activity of Fe-BEA Zeolites in SCR of
NO with Ammonia and N2O Decomposition. Catal. Today 2014, 235,
210−225. (19) Boron , P.; Chmielarz, L.; Gurgul, J.; tka, K.;
Shishido, T.; Krafft, J.-M.; Dzwigaj, S. BEA Zeolite Modified with
Iron as Effective Catalyst for N2O Decomposition and Selective
Reduction of NO with Ammonia. Appl. Catal., B 2013, 138−139,
434−445. (20) Krishna, K.; Seijger, G. B. F.; van den Bleek, C. M.;
Makkee, M.; Mul, G.; Calis, H. P. A. Selective Catalytic Reduction
of NO with NH3
over Fe-ZSM-5 Catalysts Prepared by Sublimation of FeCl3 at
Different Temperatures. Catal. Lett. 2003, 86, 121−132. (21)
Iwasaki, M.; Yamazaki, K.; Banno, K.; Shinjoh, H. Character-
ization of Fe/ZSM-5 DeNOx Catalysts Prepared by Different Methods:
Relationships Between Active Fe Sites and NH3-SCR Performance. J.
Catal. 2008, 260, 205−216. (22) Long, R. Q.; Yang, R. T. Superior
Fe-ZSM-5 Catalyst for Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide
by Ammonia. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5595−5596. (23) Kumar, M.
S.; Schwidder, M.; Grunert, W.; Bruckner, A. On the Nature of
Different Iron Sites and their Catalytic Role in Fe-ZSM-5 DeNOx
catalysts: New Insights by a Combined EPR and UV/VIS Spectroscopic
Approach. J. Catal. 2004, 227, 384−397. (24) Schwidder, M.;
Santhosh Kumar, M.; Bruckner, A.; Grunert, W. Active Sites for NO
Reduction over Fe-ZSM-5 Catalysts. Chem. Commun. 2005, 805−807.
(25) Schwidder, M.; Kumar, M. S.; Klementiev, K.; Pohl, M. M.;
Bruckner, A.; Grunert, W. Selective Reduction of NO with
Fe-ZSM-5
Catalysts of Low Fe Content: I. Relations Between Active Site
Structure and Catalytic Performance. J. Catal. 2005, 231, 314−330.
(26) Long, R. Q.; Yang, R. T. Fe-ZSM-5 for Selective Catalytic
Reduction of NO with NH3: A Comparative Study of Different
Preparation Techniques. Catal. Lett. 2001, 74, 201−205. (27) Sun,
Q.; Gao, Z.-X.; Chen, H.-Y.; Sachtler, W. M. H. Reduction of NOx
with Ammonia over Fe/MFI: Reaction Mechanism Based on Isotopic
Labeling. J. Catal. 2001, 201, 89−99. (28) Qi, G.; Yang, R. T.
Ultra-active Fe/ZSM-5 Catalyst for Selective Catalytic Reduction of
Nitric Oxide with Ammonia. Appl. Catal., B 2005, 60, 13−22. (29)
Sun, Q.; Gao, Z.-X.; Wen, B.; Sachtler, W. M. H. Spectroscopic
Evidence for a Nitrite Intermediate in the Catalytic Reduction of
NOx
with Ammonia on Fe/MFI. Catal. Lett. 2002, 78, 1−5. (30) Chen,
H.-Y.; Sun, Q.; Wen, B.; Yeom, Y.-H.; Weitz, E.; Sachtler, W. M. H.
Reduction over Zeolite-based Catalysts of Nitrogen Oxides in
Emissions Containing Excess Oxygen: Unraveling the Reaction
Mechanism. Catal. Today 2004, 96, 1−10. (31) Delahay, G.; Valade,
D.; Guzman-Vargas, A.; Coq, B. Selective Catalytic Reduction of
Nitric Oxide with Ammonia on Fe-ZSM-5 Catalysts Prepared by
Different Methods. Appl. Catal., B 2005, 55, 149−155. (32) Joyner,
R.; Stockenhuber, M. Preparation, Characterization, and Performance
of Fe−ZSM-5 Catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 5963−5976. (33)
Li, J.; Li, S. A DFT Study toward Understanding the High Activity
of Fe-Exchanged Zeolites for the “Fast” Selective Catalytic
Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides with Ammonia. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008,
112, 16938−16944. (34) Gurgul, J.; tka, K.; Hnat, I.; Rynkowski,
J.; Dzwigaj, S. Identification of Iron Species in FeSiBEA by DR
UV−vis, XPS and Mossbauer Spectroscopy: Influence of Fe Content.
Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 168, 1−6. (35) Hadjiivanov, K.;
Ivanova, E.; Kefirov, R.; Janas, J.; Plesniar, A.; Dzwigaj, S.;
Che, M. Adsorption Properties of Fe-containing Dealuminated BEA
Zeolites as Revealed by FTIR Spectroscopy. Microporous Mesoporous
Mater. 2010, 131, 1−12. (36) Rouquerol, J.; Llewellyn, P.;
Rouquerol, F. Is the BET Equation Applicable to Microporous
Adsorbents? Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2007, 160, 49−56. (37) Spaek,
T.; Pietrzyk, P.; Sojka, Z. Application of the Genetic Algorithm
Joint with the Powell Method to Nonlinear Least-Squares Fitting of
Powder EPR Spectra. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 18−29. (38)
Barzetti, T.; Selli, E.; Moscotti, D.; Forni, L. Pyridine and
Ammonia as Probes for FTIR Analysis of Solid Acid Catalysts. J.
Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1996, 92, 1401−1407. (39) Van Oers, C.
J.; Gora-Marek, K.; Sadowska, K.; Mertens, M.; Meynen, V.; Datka,
J.; Cool, P. In Situ IR Spectroscopic Study to Reveal the Impact of
the Synthesis Conditions of Zeolite Beta Nanoparticles on the
Acidic Properties of the Resulting Zeolite. Chem. Eng. J. 2014,
237, 372−379. (40) Datka, J.; Kawalek, A.; Gora-Marek, K. Acid
Properties of NaKH-Ferrierites of Various Exchange Degrees Studied
by IR Spectroscopy. Appl. Catal., A 2003, 243 (2), 293−299. (41)
Gora-Marek, K.; Gil, B.; Datka, J. Quantitative IR Studies of the
Concentration of Co2+ and Co3+ Sites in Zeolites CoZSM-5 and CoFER.
Appl. Catal., A 2009, 353, 117−122. (42) Gora-Marek, K.; Brylewska,
K.; Tarach, K. A.; Choi, M. Quantitative Aspects of the
Identification of Fe(II) Moieties in ZSM-5 Zeolites with Various
Pore Hierarchies. Dalton Transactions 2015, 44, 8031−8040. (43)
Sazama, P.; Wichterlova, B.; Tabor, E.; St’astny, P.; Sathu, N. K.;
Sobalík, Z.; Dedecek, J.; Sklenak, S.; Klein, P.; Vondrova, A.
Tailoring of the Structure of Fe-cationic Species in Fe-ZSM-5 by
Distribution of Al Atoms in the Framework for N2O Decomposition and
NH3-SCR- NOx. J. Catal. 2014, 312, 123−138. (44) Kefirov, R.;
Ivanova, E.; Hadjiivanov, K.; Dzwigaj, S.; Che, M. FTIR
Characterization of Fe3+−OH Groups in Fe−H−BEA Zeolite: Interaction
with CO and NO. Catal. Lett. 2008, 125 (3), 209−214.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842
(45) Hawn, D. D.; DeKoven, B. M. Deconvolution as a Correction for
Photoelectron Inelastic Energy Losses in the Core Level XPS Spectra
of Iron Oxides. Surf. Interface Anal. 1987, 10, 63−74. (46) Garten,
R. L.; Delgass, W. N.; Boudart, M. A Mossbauer Spectroscopic Study
of the Reversible Oxidation of Ferrous Ions in Y Zeolite. J. Catal.
1970, 18, 90−107. (47) Kuzmann, E.; Nagy, S.; Vertes, A. IUPAC
Recommendations and Technical Reports-Critical Review of Analytical
Applications of Mossbauer spectroscopy Illustrated by Mineralogical
and Geological Examples. Pure Appl. Chem. 2003, 75, 801−858. (48)
Burns, R. G. Mineral Mossbauer Spectroscopy: Correlations between
Chemical Shift and Quadrupole Splitting Parameters. Hyperfine
Interact. 1994, 91, 739−745. (49) Hajjar, R.; Millot, Y.; Man, P.
P.; Che, M.; Dzwigaj, S. Two Kinds of Framework Al Sites Studied in
BEA Zeolite by X-ray Diffraction, Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy, NMR Techni- ques, and V Probe. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008,
112, 20167−20175. (50) Guglielminotti, E. Spectroscopic
Characterization of the Fe/ ZrO2 System: 1. CO Adsorption. J. Phys.
Chem. 1994, 98, 4884−4891. (51) Madia, G.; Koebel, M.; Elsener, M.;
Wokaun, A. Side Reactions in the Selective Catalytic Reduction of
NOx with Various NO2
Fractions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 4008−4015. (52) Volodin,
A. M.; Dubkov, K. A.; Lund, A. Direct ESR Detection of S = 3/2
States for Nitrosyl Iron Complexes in FeZSM-5 Zeolites. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 2001, 333, 41−44. (53) Chen, H. Y.; El-Malki, E.-M.; Wang,
X.; van Santen, R. A.; Sachtler, W. M. H. Identification of Active
Sites and Adsorption Complexes in Fe/MFI Catalysts for NOx
Reduction. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 162, 159−174. (54)
Dzwigaj, S.; Stievano, L.; Wagner, F. E.; Che, M. Effect of
Preparation and Metal Content on the Introduction of Fe in BEA
Zeolite, Studied by DR UV−Vis, EPR and Mossbauer Spectroscopy. J.
Phys. Chem. Solids 2007, 68, 1885−1891. (55) Zhilinskaya, E. A.;
Delahay, G.; Mauvezin, M.; Coq, B.; Aboukaïs, A. EPR Investigation
of Fe-Exchanged Beta-Zeolites. Langmuir 2003, 19, 3596−3602. (56)
Gil, B.; Adamski, A. Complementary Use of IR and EPR Spectroscopies
for Characterization of Iron Species in Thermally Treated MFI-type
Zeolites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2010, 127, 82−89. (57) Kim,
M.-Y.; Lee, K. W.; Park, J.-H.; Shin, C.-H.; Lee, J.; Seo, G.
Catalytic Decomposition of Nitrous Oxide over Fe-BEA Zeolites:
Essential Components of Iron Active Sites. Korean J. Chem. Eng.
2010, 27, 76−82. (58) Volodin, A. M.; Zhidomirov, G. M.; Dubkov, K.
A.; Hensen, E. J. M.; van Santen, R. A. Spin Design of Iron
Complexes on Fe-ZSM-5 Zeolites. Catal. Today 2005, 110, 247−254.
(59) Schreurs, J. W. H. Low Field Hyperfine Structure in the EPR
Spectra of Mn2+ Containing Glasses. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 69, 2151−
2156. (60) Bordiga, S.; Buzzoni, R.; Geobaldo, F.; Lamberti, C.;
Giamello, E.; Zecchina, A.; Leofanti, G.; Petrini, G.; Tozzola, G.;
Vlaic, G. Structure and Reactivity of Framework and Extraframework
Iron in Fe-Silicalite as Investigated by Spectroscopic and
Physicochemical Methods. J. Catal. 1996, 158, 486−501. (61) Fejes,
P.; Nagy, J. B.; Lazar, K.; Halasz, J. Heat-treatment of
Isomorphously Substituted ZSM-5 (MFI) Zeolites: An ESR and
Mossbauer Spectroscopy and Kinetic Study. Appl. Catal., A 2000,
190, 117−135. (62) Kucherov, A. V.; Shelef, M. Quantitative
Determination of Isolated Fe3+ Cations in FeHZSM-5 Catalysts by
ESR. J. Catal. 2000, 195, 106−112. (63) Shih, S. Chemical Reactions
of Alkenes and Alkynes with Solid- state Defects on ZSM-5. J.
Catal. 1983, 79, 390−395. (64) Fisicaro, P.; Giamello, E.; Berlier,
G.; Lamberti, C. Paramagnetic Nitrosyliron Adducts in Pentasilic
Zeolites: an EPR Study. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2003, 29,
805−816.
(65) Enemark, J. H.; Feltham, R. D. Principles of Structure,
Bonding, and Reactivity for Metal Nitrosyl Complexes. Coord. Chem.
Rev. 1974, 13, 339−406. (66) Malykhin, E. S.; Volodin, M. A.;
Zhidomirov, M. G. Spin States of Iron-Nitrosyl Adsorption Complexes
Formed in Fe-ZSM5 Zeolites. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2008, 33, 153−166.
(67) Schmidt, R.; Amiridis, M. D.; Dumesic, J. A.; Zelewski, L. M.;
Millman, W. S. In Situ Moessbauer Spectroscopy Studies of Fe-Y
Zeolites for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide by
Ammonia. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 8142−8149. (68) Pieterse, J. A.
Z.; Booneveld, S.; van den Brink, R. W. Evaluation of Fe-zeolite
Catalysts Prepared by Different Methods for the Decomposition of
N2O. Appl. Catal., B 2004, 51, 215−228. (69) Boron , P.; Chmielarz,
L.; Gurgul, J.; tka, K.; Gil, B.; Marszaek, B.; Dzwigaj, S.
Influence of Iron State and Acidity of Zeolites on the Catalytic
Activity of FeHBEA, FeHZSM-5 and FeHMOR in SCR of NO with NH3 and
N2O Decomposition. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 203, 73−85.
(70) Li, G.; Pidko, E. A.; van Santen, R. A.; Li, C.; Hensen, E. J.
M. Stability of Extraframework Iron-Containing Complexes in ZSM-5
Zeolite. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 413−426. (71) Iwasaki, M.;
Shinjoh, H. A Comparative Study of “Standard”, “Fast” and “NO2” SCR
Reactions over Fe/zeolite Catalyst. Appl. Catal., A 2010, 390,
71−77. (72) Devadas, M.; Krocher, O.; Elsener, M.; Wokaun, A.;
Soger, N.; Pfeifer, M.; Demel, Y.; Mussmann, L. Influence of NO2 on
the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with Ammonia over Fe-ZSM5.
Appl. Catal., B 2006, 67, 187−196. (73) Kamasamudram, K.; Henry,
C.; Currier, N.; Yezerets, A. N2O formation and mitigation in
diesel aftertreatment systems. SAE International Journal of Engines
2012, 5, 688−698. (74) Shi, X.; Liu, F.; Xie, L.; Shan, W.; He, H.
NH3-SCR Performance of Fresh and Hydrothermally Aged Fe-ZSM-5 in
Standard and Fast Selective Catalytic Reduction Reactions. Environ.
Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 3293−3298. (75) Li, M.; Yeom, Y.; Weitz,
E.; Sachtler, W. M. H. An Acid Catalyzed Step in the Catalytic
Reduction of NOx to N2. Catal. Lett. 2006, 112, 129−132. (76)
Schwidder, M.; Santhosh Kumar, M.; Bentrup, U.; Perez- Ramírez, J.;
Bruckner, A.; Grunert, W. The Role of Brønsted Acidity in the SCR
of NO over Fe-MFI Catalysts. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008,
111, 124−133. (77) Long, R. Q.; Yang, R. T. Reaction Mechanism of
Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3 over Fe-ZSM-5
Catalyst. J. Catal. 2002, 207, 224−231. (78) Brandenberger, S.;
Krocher, O.; Wokaun, A.; Tissler, A.; Althoff, R. The Role of
Brønsted Acidity in the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with
Ammonia over Fe-ZSM-5. J. Catal. 2009, 268, 297−306. (79)
Brandenberger, S.; Krocher, O.; Casapu, M.; Tissler, A.; Althoff,
R. Hydrothermal Deactivation of Fe-ZSM-5 Catalysts for the
Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3. Appl. Catal., B 2011,
101, 649− 659. (80) Shwan, S.; Jansson, J.; Korsgren, J.; Olsson,
L.; Skoglundh, M. Kinetic Modeling of H-BEA and Fe-BEA as NH3-SCR
Catalysts Effect of Hydrothermal Treatment. Catal. Today 2012, 197,
24−37. (81) Chen, X.; Li, W.; Schwank, J. W. Reactivity of NH3 over
(Fe)/ H-ZSM-5 Zeolite: Studies of Temperature-Programmed and
Steady- State Reactions. Catal. Today 2011, 175, 2−11.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05692 J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120,
16831−16842