20
State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen P. Coelen University of Connecticut , Storrs CT WISER, Holyoke Community College, Holyoke MA University of Fort Hare, South Africa [email protected]

State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

State Capacity,Demographic Change

and Workforce DevelopmentState Higher Education Executive Office Conference

Summer 2007Park Plaza Hotel Boston

Stephen P. CoelenUniversity of Connecticut , Storrs CT

WISER, Holyoke Community College, Holyoke MAUniversity of Fort Hare, South Africa

[email protected]

Page 2: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

2020 Vision of New England Demographic Change: The Perfect Demographic Storms I-III

This storm, like that of the recent movie, was caused by:

•Younger minority population

•Higher Hispanic fertility rate

•Higher minority migration rates

Resulting in:

•Higher natural increases in minority population

•Higher migrations of minority persons

CT: 12th Grade Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity

05000

10000150002000025000300003500040000

1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020

Year

Stu

den

ts E

nro

lled

CT White Enrollment CT Asian Enrollment

CT Black Enrollment CT Hispanic EnrollmentCT Native American Enrollment

If existing rates perpetuate themselves, we will obtain:

Page 3: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

2020 Vision of New England Demographic Change: The Perfect Demographic Storm IV

Adding to the first three forces, a fourth:

•Historically lower minority educational attainment rates by race and ethnicity

CT: New Entrants to the Labor Force, by Education Attainment

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020

BA Plus

Some College

HS Only

No HS

Data Source: MISER Estimates & Projections

CT: % of New Labor Force Entrants with BA or more

0.280.29

0.30.310.320.330.340.35

1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020

Per

cen

t

% with BA

Data Source: MISER Estimates & Projections

There will be a clear labor force problem in CT by 2020:

Page 4: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

% of Young Entrants with a Baccalaureate or more

For all states but New Hampshire, the proportion of Baccalaureate holders will fall significantly without improvements in educational attainment 15

Page 5: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

MA: New Entrants to the Labor Force with Some College or More

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Time

% with BA

% with Some College

26.7%

69.5%

25.3%

65.2%

Community College AA/AS Degrees & Baccalaurate non-completers

Baccalaurate or Graduate Degree Completers

In Massachusetts, the decline in educational attainment ofworkers includes those with some college—AssociateDegrees or incomplete work toward a baccalaureate

16 For Massachusetts, while the the proportion of young with Baccalaureates will fall by 2.9%, the

proportion with some college will fall by nearly 1.4% without educational improvements

Page 6: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

In Connecticut, the decline in educational attainment of workers also includes all, from those with some college through those with completed baccalaureates and professional degrees

For Connecticut, while the the proportion of young with Baccalaureates will fall by 3.5%, the proportion with some college will fall by nearly 1% without educational improvements

61.3%

57.0%

34.0%30.5%

Holders of associate degrees, certificates and partial work towardbaccalaureate degrees

Holders of baccalaureate, professional and advanceddegrees

17

Page 7: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

Integrated Education—Labor Policy to Create Crucial Workforce Development1. Of Connecticut high school students going to college:

a. More than half go out-of-State to college,b. All go to a panoply of colleges andc. Few go to or graduate from CT private colleges

2. The public institutions seem to act as an integrated unit,a. doing what most expect of the various levels, andb. graduating reasonable proportions of their students

3. There is a significant brain drain from Connecticut becausea. There is too large a portion of the “bright kids” who don’t go on to any

college after high school, andb. For those who do, all too often, the brightest go out of State for college

4. Strategies would utilize the public system more

Page 8: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

Connecticut high school students going to college: More than half go out-of-State for college

7.7%6.6%

.5%2.7%

11.3%beyond Northeast

3.8%

51.1%ut

Page 9: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

There is a significant Connecticut Brain-drain: • too large a portion of bright kids don’t go to any college afterhigh school, and• for those who go to College, all too often, the brightest go out- of-State

Penetration of Colleges Segments into Connecticut's 1998 H.S. Graduating Class by

CAPT Math Score

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

100

178

202

218

230

241

252

263

276

293

326

Scaled CAPT Score

Nu

mb

ers

of

Stu

den

ts

No Evidence of CollegeParticipation

Likely in College, but withUnreported First College

Attendance in College outside ofConnecticut

Public Flagship Universities inConnecticut or Rhode Island

Public Selective Universities inCT. or RI (including CSU)

Public Community Colleges inCT. or RI

Private Highly Selective Collegesin CT. or RI

Private Selective Colleges in CT.or RI

Private 2-Yr Colleges in CT. or RI

Penetration of Colleges Segments into Connecticut's 1998 H.S. Graduating Class by

CAPT Math Score

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

100

169

192

207

218

227

235

244

252

260

269

279

293

314

386

Scaled CAPT Score

Nu

mb

ers

of

Stu

den

tsPe

rcen

tage

of S

tude

nts

Page 10: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

Integrated activities of CT Public Higher Education: providing a diversity of access, opportunity, and competitionacross the various segments. The three public sectors do what is expected of them

CAPT Distributions of Public College Segments

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

Scaled CAPT Score

Nu

mb

er o

f S

tud

ents Public Community Colleges in

CT. or RI

Public Selective Universities inCT. or RI (including CSU)

Public Flagship Universities inConnecticut or Rhode Island

Perc

ent o

f Stu

dent

s

Page 11: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

Higher Education Strategies for Workforce DevelopmentQuality of Not Continuing to College and Those at CSU & CTC are equal

Comparison of Those Not Going to Collegewith

CT Community Colleges and the CSU System

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0.04

0.045

0.05

100

169

192

207

218

227

235

244

252

260

269

279

293

314

386

No Evidence of CollegeParticipation

Public Community Collegesin CT. or RI

Public Selective Universitiesin CT. or RI (including CSU)

Page 12: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

Higher Education Strategies for Workforce DevelopmentQuality of Those Leaving the State and Those at UConn are equal

Comparison of Those Going Out-of-State to Collegewith

the University of Connecticut

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

100

169

192

207

218

227

235

244

252

260

269

279

293

314

386

In College, Out-of State

Public Flagship Universitiesin Connecticut or RhodeIsland

Page 13: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

Higher Education Strategies for Workforce Development in Connecticut

At the University of Connecticut Build capacity at UConn to attract those leaving the StateStrengthen the UConn Valedictorian/Salutatorian Scholarship Program

At CSU and the Community CollegesEstablish Programs at CSU and the Community Colleges to

attract those not currently continuing after high school

And, everywhere:Implement loan interest reduction programs for students depending on

speed of completing their programs and eventual location for workInvolve students while still in college in more internship opportunities to develop student knowledge of Connecticut businessConsider entrepreneur opportunities for students who graduate from Connecticut colleges and who stay in State

Page 14: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

1.Never give up on youth as our future2.Never use unidimensional testing measures when skills required for real-world success are multidimensional.3.Pay less attention to passing every child on a test, and more on setting opportunities and access, real K-16 partnerships. 4.Open campuses and faculty to focus on the real world,

a) not squeezing more from faculty for more dollarsb) developing capacities for the business community, WISERTrade

5.Financing, depending on: a) student speedb) utilization of educational programs post-degreec) creativity, developing from entrepreneurial collegiate programs

6.Pay attention to longer run:a) Off shoring of jobs- some jobs will go, some will stay, be decisive

and strategic about education’s role in this.

Recommendations for Higher Education in Dealing with State Workforce Capacity

Page 15: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

Thank you.

Stephen P. Coelen

[email protected]

Page 16: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

Educational Attainment by Race and Ethnicity

Significant gaps in attainment among race/ethnic groups, however, occurred during the 1990’s

Gains were greater for the white population than for other races and ethnicities

12

Page 17: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

Changes in Attainment by Race and Ethnicity

There was a small growth in numbers of white persons with completed baccalaureates in the 1990’s, but most gains came from improvements in attainment

Much of the gain for minority populations came from increases in the population; much less came from improvements in attainment

For the Hispanic population, there were decreases in participation rates in college and graduation rates from college 13

Page 18: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

There are only two conclusions

Conclusion #1: CAPT and SAT are quite different exams

1. Correlations between CAPT and SAT are quite small

2. There are huge overlaps in the distributions of the two exams, measured bya. The Joint Distribution of the exam scoresb. The Distribution of SAT by CAPT score band

3. SAT and CAPT show different abilities to predict future success beyond high school, sometimes CAPT predicting better than SAT; sometimes SAT, better than CAPT; and sometimes they are independently useful in predicting specific outcomes

4. Therefore, it should not be a question of whether one exam should replace the other or vice versa. More information is better than less. CAPT and SAT provide independently useful information. More study should be given to which exam should be used for different purposes

Page 19: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

SAT Performance by CAPT Math Score

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

(400

,499

)

(500

,599

)

(600

,699

)

(700

,799

)

(800

,899

)

(900

,999

)

(100

0,10

99)

(110

0,11

99)

(120

0,12

99)

(130

0,13

99)

(140

0,14

99)

(150

0,15

99)

(160

0)

Total SAT Score

Nu

mb

er o

f S

tud

ents

Scoreband 1: 4%

Scoreband 2: 8%

Scoreband 3: 34%

Scoreband 4: 53%

Students must have a valid SAT and CAPT score to be included. Scorebands are based on 1995 cut-offs from "Connecticut Academic Performance Test: Understanding CAPT Results on High School Transcripts

2.Overlaps between CAPT and SAT b.i. Distribution of SAT by CAPT Math score band A sizeable overlap in SAT by CAPT math score band

Page 20: State Capacity, Demographic Change and Workforce Development State Higher Education Executive Office Conference Summer 2007 Park Plaza Hotel Boston Stephen

SAT Range 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8200-399 661 478 414 357 315 277 262 231 34.9%300-599 3370 2411 2092 1820 1668 1487 1440 1305 38.7%600-800 563 317 248 211 194 172 158 142 25.2%

percent remaining

Cumulative Credits over 16 Semesters: By SAT Verbal

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

No of Semesters since Start

Cu

mu

lati

ve C

red

its

200-399

300-599

600-800

SAT Range 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 percent remaining200-399 793 590 516 435 392 337 313 287 36.2%300-599 3230 2307 2012 1765 1613 1455 1412 1279 39.6%600-800 571 309 226 188 172 144 135 112 19.6%

Cumulative Credits over 16 Semesters: By SAT Math

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

No of Semesters since Start

Cu

mu

lati

ve C

red

its

200-399

300-599

600-800

3. Differential Predictive Ability of CAPT and SAT e.ii. Passing More Credits by Semester vs. SAT Components

Differences in accumulated credits over 8 semesters appear to be bigger for differences in Verbal than in Math SAT exams, but as will show on the next two slides, smaller than for comparable CAPT subject tests.