Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 1
STATE OF MAINE
COUNTY OF YORK CITY OF SACO
I. CALL TO ORDER – On Monday, September 21, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. a Council Meeting was held in the
City Hall Auditorium.
II. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS – Mayor Roland Michaud conducted a roll call of the members and
determined that the Councilors present constituted a quorum. Councilors present: Margaret Mills, Leslie Smith Jr.,
Ronald E. Morton, Sandra Bastille, Arthur Tardif, Eric Cote and Marston Lovell. City Administrator Rick Michaud
was also present.
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IV. GENERAL:
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 8, 2009
No action.
VI. AGENDA ITEMS:
A. JOE RILEY EMPLOYEE AWARD – KEVIN LOMBARD, PARKS & RECREATION
PROGRAM DIRECTOR
The City has an employee recognition program titled the ‘Joe Riley Quality Service Award’. The award is open to
all employees- full time, part time, seasonal, union/non-union; and merit/non-merit eligibility. The intent of this
program is to recognize an outstanding employee or group of employees for exceptional performance and to inspire
employees to perform at their highest levels.
The award is given on a quarterly basis. Nominations can be made by any employee, citizen, or board/committee
member. Candidates for the award should meet the criteria as established on the nomination form as follows in part:
Record of excellence in day to day performance
Leadership by example
‘Can Do’ attitude
Dedication to serving the public
Service above and beyond
Some of the remarks included in the nomination form for tonight’s recipient are:
His hard work & dedication has transformed the programs
Increase in revenue can be attributed to his commitment and drive
He has implemented policies & procedures to ensure not only safe but staffed by qualified
individuals
He was instrumental during renovations with his vision of the building’s potential by using
his construction background
He is an invaluable resource and one of the most versatile individuals to work with
It is with a great deal of pride that Mayor Roland Michaud presented the Joe Riley Quality Service Award
to: Kevin Lombard, Parks & Recreation Program Director. The City of Saco hired Kevin on July 18,
2003.
Kevin’s name has been added to the Joe Riley Quality Service Award Plaque, and has received a $100 gift card.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 2
B. RECOGNITION OF GIRLS SOFTBALL AND BOYS LITTLE LEAGUE ACCOMPLISH-
MENTS
Mayor Roland Michaud presented certificates of achievement and pins from the city to each of the members and
staff from both the Girls Softball and Boys Little League teams.
Saco Senior All Star Girls State Softball Championship
For the first time in the 19 year history of the Saco Girl’s Little League softball, a Saco major league All Star team
has won a State title. Saco’s Senior League team took two out of three from Camden-Rockport in the final round to
capture the title.
Due to the season-long weather issues, and schedule quirks, Saco’s regular season had ended 1 month before the
finals, and the cobwebs showed in game 1 as Camden eked out an 8-7 win. But, the following day, all warmed up
and back to form, Saco swept both games of a doubleheader 13-3 (5 inning mercy rule) and 7-0 (5 inning rain-
shortened) to win the championship.
At the conclusion of the final game, pictures and tears from many of the moms were the rule, as this Saco team is
comprised of many girls who have chased this dream for literally years. As Saco’s most successful “grouping”
ever, players from this team go back 4 and 5 years.
Saco’s team:
Mary Brown – cf, ss Katie Campisi – rf, lf Taylor Duranceau – 1b, rf
Kristen Duross – lf, cf Arica Foster – c Aryn Foster – 2b, p, cf
Karen Jacques – 2b, cf Katie Kalagias – p, 3b, cf Courtney Lynch – 1b, lf
Vanessa McCrum – 3b, p Amanda Robinson – 2b Jenny Scontras – ss, c
Meg Strickland – rf Katherine Zafirson - 3b, c, 1b
Manager: Stan Scontras Coach: Tom Duross
Saco Little League All Star State Championship
The Saco little league boys all stars won the 10-11 year old division Little League state championship. The team is
comprised of thirteen 11 year-old players. Prior to advancing to the state tournament, the team won the District 4
championship by defeating Kennebunk and then Wells Ogunquit twice. In the district tournament, the team
outscored their opponents by a combined score of 46-3! The district tournament was held at Saco’s home field on
Summer Street.
The team advanced to the state tournament in Cape Elizabeth and lost the opening game on Saturday, July 25 to
Waldo County by a score of 4-0. That put the team in the losers bracket which meant they had to play pretty much
every day until the end of the tournament. The team went on to win the rest of their games, which is a tremendous
accomplishment.
Losing the opening game and then advancing through the loser's bracket is very difficult to do. However, they
worked as a team and each player made significant contributions to the team’s success in both the district and state
tournaments.
Saco’s Team:
Mitchell Bechard Justin Cloutier Andre Coleman Jacob Hale Josh Hill
Ben Lambert Austin McCrum Isaac Patry Logan Picard Colby Priest
Conor Purvis Chris Vallee Ben Zuke
Coaches: Eric Purvis (Manager), Keith Lambert, Mark McInnis, Tim Vallee and Brad McCrum.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 3
C. PROCLAMATION – FAMILY DAY 2009
Mayor Roland Michaud proclaimed Monday, September 28, 2009 as Family Day in the City of Saco. A day to eat
dinner with your children, and urged all citizens to recognize and participate in its observance.
Family Day is a national movement that promotes the parental engagement fostered during frequent family dinners
as a simple, effective way to prevent substance abuse in kids. Family Day is celebrated annually on the fourth
Monday in September and was launched by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia
University in 2001.
A copy of the complete proclamation is on page 9 as Attachment A.
Councilor Smith moved, Councilor Mills seconded to accept the proclamation. The motion passed with unanimous
consent.
D. CODE AMENDMENT – CHAPTER 15, FUNDS – (PUBLIC HEARING)
There are several trust funds held by the city as trustee. Each has its own ordinance providing governing use,
administration, etc.
City code Chapter 15, Funds, Article I, and II, Trust Funds provides the structure for the care of these trusts and the
charge of the Board of Trustees. Chapter 15 is being updated to reflect current practice; the changes in the Code are
housekeeping in nature and refer to: Article I, appointment and term, meeting requirements, and vacancies; and
Article II, membership and term.
There will be a Public Hearing to set compensation for board members, and to appoint members to the Board of
Trustees in Article I on October 5, 2009.
The city council discussed this item at Workshop on August 3, 2009; August 17, and the First Reading was held on
August 31, 2009.
EXHIBITS: - Board of Trustee Members and Term for Trusts, and Lucia Kimball
Deering Hospital Fund
- Balance Sheet – 06/30/2008
- Profit and Loss – 06/30/2008
- CAFR – Special Revenue Funds
- Ltr from Atty Ken Cole re Kimball Funds
- Ltr sent to Trust & Kimball Trust Board Members
- The following have been previously provided:
- York County Superior Court: Interpretation of Will (pg. 24)
- Private & Special Law: 1917 Bequest of Lucia Kimball (pg.33)
- Opinion in RE: Lucia Kimball DT by Atty Brickates (pg.34)
- Portion of the Lucia Kimball Deering Will (pg.48)
- Ordinance Creating the Board to accept legacies and bequests 1919 (
- Amendments to the Ordinance, 1929 and 1934 (pg. 54 & 59)
- Deed conveying map 52, lots 9 and 42 (pg. 60)
Councilor Lovell moved, Councilor Smith seconded to open the Public Hearing of the First Reading of the
document titled, ‘Amendments to Chapter 15, Funds, dated August 3, 2009’. The motion passed with unanimous
consent.
There were no comments from the public.
Councilor Lovell moved, Councilor Smith seconded to close the Public Hearing and “Be it Ordered that the City
Council set the Second and Final Reading of the document titled, ‘Amendments to Chapter 15, Funds, dated August
3, 2009’, for October 5, 2009”. The motion passed with seven (7) yeas.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 4
A copy of the document titled ‘Amendments to Chapter 15, Funds, dated August 3, 2009’ and the Exhibits are on
page 10 as Attachment B.
E. CONFIRM THE MAYORS APPOINTMENT TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION
The Historic Preservation Commission consists of five members and up to five associate members, appointed by
the Mayor and confirmed by the Council, for a 3-year term. Some of the duties of the Commission are to: review
applications for certificate of appropriateness, advise and inform the City officials and owners of historic buildings,
structures or sites, on physical and financial aspects of preservation, renovation, and rehabilitation. Each
Commission member shall be a resident of the City and shall be persons qualified to perform the duties of such
office and shall serve without compensation.
The Mayor is nominating Don Uldbjerg of Glenhaven Circle, as a regular member of the Commission through 6-
30-12.
He replaces Gabrielle Gallucci, 96 Elm Street, whose term expired on 6-30-09. Ms. Gallucci does not wish to be
regular member but would accept an appointment as an associate member (alternate).
Councilor Bastille moved, Councilor Lovell seconded that “Be it Ordered that the City Council confirm the
Mayor’s appointment of Don Uldbjerg of Glenhaven Circle, to a term ending June 30, 2012, and to appoint
Gabrielle Gallucci, of Elm Street, to a term as an associate member, ending June 30, 2012.” Further move to
approve the Order. The motion passed with seven (7) yeas.
F. MORATORIUM ON CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS EXCEEDING 5000
SQUARE FEET IN THE B-3 DISTRICT – (PUBLIC HEARING) EMERGENCY ADOPTION
On September 8, 2009 the Council referred to the Planning Board a review of zoning issues in the B-3 district. The
B-3 Downtown Business District is the city’s central business district including properties between Elm and Main
Streets, as well as other areas on the east side of Main Street.
Because Mayor Michaud has expressed an interest in potential retroactivity of the amendments which may be
proposed by the Planning Board and Council, staff consulted land use attorney Natalie Burns, who advised that
notice is important to support retroactivity. She also advised that a moratorium would provide the maximum notice
available to support an eventual enactment of ordinance amendments with retroactivity provisions. The Council set
September 21, 2009 for the public hearing on a moratorium provision, which would be adopted immediately,
pursuant to emergency provisions of the charter.
Under the City Charter, an emergency ordinance can be in force for 60 days before renewal. Under state law, a
moratorium can be in force for 180 days total, before renewal. So, if the Council adopted a moratorium tonight it
should also refer a non-emergency 120 days extension to the Planning Board for a recommendation, and the
Council should complete a normal ordinance enactment within 60 days.
The draft moratorium lays out some of the concerns expressed by the Council on Sept. 8 and would prohibit
construction of commercial buildings in excess of 5000 square feet during the moratorium.
Ninety- six notices of this hearing were mailed to property owners on Cutts, Thornton, Pleasant Storer, Water,
Main, Elm, Front, Free, Wharf, Deering, Common Streets and Pepperell Square. The public hearing notice was also
advertised.
Councilor Lovell moved, Councilor Smith seconded to open the Public Hearing on the moratorium on
construction of commercial buildings exceeding 5000 square feet in the B-3 district. The motion passed with
unanimous consent.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 5
Advocates:
Mark D. Johnston, 17 Elm Street – Mr. Johnston has lived in Saco for 35 years and currently owns 3 residential
properties (built in 1820, 1821, and 1826) which are listed as historic properties in the National Register, three
commercial properties know as the central block that were built in 1829, and a corner lot on Main & Storer Streets.
Mr. Johnston restores historic properties in the downtown area, and he is in favor of the proposed moratorium being
presented this evening. All of these properties are in the B-3 Zone so these restrictions that he has been advocating for
in the moratorium have an impact on these properties. The 300 year history and architecture in Saco makes the
community unique in comparison to many other towns in the State. Mr. Johnston reviewed the history of the area, the
building that used to be located there, the buildings that are currently located there, as well as the various “B” Zones.
Mr. Johnston spoke about the make-up of the B-3 zone, and how and why it as created. He also noted that the B-3
Zone took three years to implement and has been tweaked several times (1989, 1992, 1995 and 2002). Why a review
the regulations may be need is because in light of the seven properties that have been auctioned in one particular
neighborhood, four of these are historic properties. If these 4 historic properties are removed this will be the largest
removal on any historic proportions in Saco’s history. For what? Developers are proposing a large single retail space
as a pharmacy with a large parking lot. History shows that Saco’s zoning is only 41 years old. The current B-3 zone is
a livable area and has been for the past 25 years. Mr. Johnston asked that this be referred back to the planning board to
allow them to draft the necessary ordinances to regulate large scale developments in a B-3 Zone, for the following
reasons:
1) The City of Saco is under increased development pressure in its downtown business district.
2) May intrude upon the residential architectural character of the downtown neighborhoods.
3) Development pressure and its impacts were undisipated and have not been adequately provided for in the cities
current zoning ordinance.
4) There is a strong likely hood that the city will continue to be subject to this development pressure due to the lack of
adequate regulations and restrictions in the location and size of commercial buildings in the B-3 zone.
5) There are not adequate set backs from residential properties.
6) Saco Zoning Ordinance related to size and character of development in the B-3 district allows multi-family uses.
That was the intent. The Planning Board should include the consideration of a mixed use in the B-3 district.
7) Drive thrus are not permitted, but the proposal submitted does have a drive thru.
8) In the last 10-15 years, because of traffic impacts, at least 60 parking spaces have been lost.
9) Would like the City Council to direct the Planning Board to do a Traffic Impact Study.
10) Would like the City Council to have an Economic Impact Study done as well. What will the impact to Main St. be?
11) High Power Lighting, Snow & Trash Removal.
12) Time the stores are open.
13) Deliveries.
The Council should consider asking the Planning Board to look at the possible expansion of the Historic District Zone.
In closing ask the Council to look at Table 4-12 of the Saco’s Zoning, the minimum lot and yard requirements. Was the
intent of the B-3 Zone to expand or encourage the expansion of large commercial single floor box stores, or was the
encouragement there for residential units? On item B-1, the minimum net residential acreage for dwelling units, section
3 of multi-families in all the other business zones it ranges from 7500 sq. ft. – 4000 sq ft., that’s what one unit needs. In
the downtown area, it is 1500 sq. ft. Maybe the proposed site should be used for a multi-purpose site, such as
commercial & residential units. The city currently has 4 drug stores already, do we really need more?
Johanna Hoffman, 10 Pepperell Square – Ms. Hoffman is a small business owner in Saco, and is in support of
the moratorium. Ms. Hoffman asked the Council to seriously consider the moratorium so the Planning Board can
further study the impacts of development in this area of this scale might have on traffic safety, infrastructure,
surrounding businesses as well as potential environmental issues created by such a large service such as a 30,000 sq. ft.
parking lot might have. The city owes it to the community to ensure that the appropriate studies have been done to
ensure that the City of Saco maintains its downtown integrity and important historic assets. If we are to allow large
chains to move into the B-3 District, guideline should be in place to ensure this or restrictions imposed on size. The city
has taken great strides to create a visually appealing downtown. Visual impact is something the city truly believes in.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 6
Large scale developments if left unchecked, especially in a tight residential area may change this visual integrity forever
and can’t be reclaimed. Most recently, up next to Kentucky Fried Chicken a historic Dutch Colonial home of sturdy
construction over 100 years old was demolished because a chain pharmacy purchased it and then abandoned the
project. Please consider the emergency moratorium on the agenda tonight. It is very important to the future of the City
of Saco and its citizens.
Beth Johnston, 62 Pleasant Street – Ms. Johnston bought her property in 1994 and has lived there ever since. If
the project goes through, it will be directly across the street from her residence, and will have a very negative effect on
the quality of her life. Ms. Johnston showed various pictures of historic homes around her home that will be
demolished if the project goes through. Some of these buildings are in bad shape, because the owners didn’t take care of
them. Some of the houses in this area that have been restored wouldn’t look as good as they do know if someone didn’t
take care of them. Is the city going in the right direction with this project? It is time to keep the city from making
more mistakes. The intent on the B-3 zone was not to have bid box stores. Ms. Johnston asked the Council to keep the
control in their hands, rather than being influenced by the money and pressure. The moratorium will allow you and the
Planning Board to at least stop and look at this project further.
Norman E. Vachon, 130 Buxton Rd – Mr. Vachon grew up in Saco and is proud to call this his home town.
We have a great history in Saco. Mr. Vachon respects history, but is not anti-business. Mr. Vachon previously worked
for a corporation and knows that they can be very responsible and do the right thing, and to not always have negative
things on their minds. Commercial businesses can’t be faulted for wanting to expand. It seems that the zoning is
created to be cautious and creative. Is this a good idea that will be irreversible and does it meet the kinds on intentions
people have in this area? It warrants a careful look again. Saco has done a great job with the Main St., downtown area.
Lucille Reed, 36 Thornton Ave. – Mrs. Reed is not against or for the moratorium. The drive-thru will be right
next to her bedroom window. She asked the council to be careful and cautious with what they do.
Opposed:
David Lowe, 42 Thornton Ave. – Has been a resident for 31 years, and also owns an insurance agency on
Thornton Ave. Mr. Lowe’s reasons for not supporting this moratorium are:
1) There was allot of misinformation going through the community on this project, which has since been corrected.
This is a project which has received support and positive site reviews from Fire, Police and Code Enforcement
Departments.
2) There are 17 pages of well defined existing ordinances in place to ensure that the architectural ascetics of this city in
the B-3 zone in question are properly maintained.
3) If project is allowed to proceed now, there will be many jobs created, and increase the cities tax revenue.
4) It will utilize fewer of the cities services.
5) Reaffirm that which is economically and morally the right thing to do.
Mr. Lowe explained that the developer has worked with the city Planning Dept., and they told him that this was a
permitted use in the B-3 Zone. The developer was contacted and approached some of the abutting neighbors to try to
work with them, and provide something that is going to be acceptable to the city. There are four properties under
contract, and these owners have made plans as well. Mr. Lowe was surprised that opposition to this project would
happen in Saco, Maine. He stated that if Council is really serious about and likes old buildings, then have them moved
elsewhere in the City, it has been done before. Mr. Lowe proposed this evening that the day that he closes on his
property which the city has accessed at $242,800, which is just the property and not the land, than he would personally
deliver the keys to the house to the city at no charge, and even throw in the chandeliers that go with it. This house could
be used for elderly housing or affordable housing units, so the city wouldn’t be losing housing. Mr. Lowe mentioned
this to Mr. Grammas the developer, and asked him why he didn’t just give all the buildings in question to the city, and
they could use them for affordable housing elsewhere.
John Grammas, Grammas Investments, Raymond, N.H. – Mr. Grammas is the developer for this CVS project.
He chose the proposed area because it connects the downtown. He has met all the property owners on the block of the
proposed project area and has come to agreements with them all. Mr. Grammas believes this is the most inviting
architectural drug store in the area, and every town would like to have it. He has met with the Planning, Code
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 7
Enforcement and Public Works Departments to work with them on this project, and it meets all the zoning. The
lighting will be the same as the ones at the Credit Union. There would be no curb cuts on Elm St., but there would be
two curb cuts altogether, one on Thornton Ave, and one on Pleasant St. Landscaping and trees will also be on the site.
By doing this project, 7 curb cuts will be taken off the block, set-backs will be met and all this was done by making 22
revisions to fine tune the project. There will be deliveries only one day a week. Mr. Grammas was shocked to hear that
the city was considering a moratorium, and believes that the Planning Board is capable of making informed decisions.
Mr. Grammas stated that he will contribute $5000 a building to move and preserve the buildings, rather than
demolishing them, because he believes in heritage as well.
Steve Bedell, 79 Watson Mill Rd – Mr. Bedell is a citizen of the city who has some concerns. His vision is a
thriving, diverse growing economy coupled with a preservation of you historic heritage. Mr. Bedell doesn’t see this
project as a threat to that. We have a very fine historic and business district in the city. We are augmenting the two by
providing some economic growth at the same time preserving some history. This is a pretty unique concept of having a
neighborhood general store for the people in the area, where you can walk to it at night to get a new toaster if yours
breaks a loaf of bread and your prescription and walk back home. It will not hurt our concept by having a
neighborhood general store. Is it not in keeping with the ascetics that some people have come to expect from that? It
probably is going to make allot of changes and he respects other folk’s opinions, but in his opinion he think that it is the
right thing for the Route 1 business corridor. There are some businesses on that corridor that are having a bit of trouble
in making, and a bit of success in that corridor may help other businesses and make them more successful as well.
Jeff Christenbury, 166 Ferry Rd – Mr. Christenbury noted that on one hand you have a group of buildings,
some restored and some not, that haven’t really been developed over the last few decades and some didn’t make it. On
the other side you have a proposed plan that has been approved by the city officials, and developers have made
concessions already, and are willing to make more concessions to protect the needs of the city. This project will bring
tax dollars and jobs to the city, and it is a good idea for the city.
Mayor Roland Michaud called a 5 minute recess at 9: 11 p.m.
Mayor Roland Michaud reconvened the meeting at 9: 16 p.m.
Don Guay, New County Rd – Mr. Guay was born in Saco, has lived here for many years, served 3 years on the
City Council, and also served on the Police & Fire Commission for years. He has allot of interest in the city. He owns
a piece of property in the proposed project area that the developer Mr. Grammas is thinking of buying, and Mr.
Grammas was not the only one interested in that corner. Mr. & Mrs. Guay felt that Mr. Grammas’s project was the best
one suited for the area. Mr. Guay doesn’t feel that the moratorium is the way to go, because it puts a lid on the pot and
lets is simmer. Let the Planning Board do their job. They have all the tools in front of them, and they will come to an
intelligent and fair decision.
Joe Moreshead, Rivers Edge Lane – Mr. Moreshead asked the Council to not vote for the moratorium before
them tonight. He noted that after hearing all the testimony this evening to all the business that have left and all the jobs
that have gone, here is an opportunity to create jobs. Mr. Moreshead appreciated the developer’s vision for the corner,
because he too feels that the corner does hide Elm Street. If you look at what the Credit Union did across the street with
their landscaping, this proposed project will only enhance that much more on the right hand side of the street. The city
will eventually need a new Municipal Garage, Fire Barn and other things and also at some-point Young School will
need to be replaced. You need revenue to do all these things. This is an also a perfect opportunity to fix up the street,
and bring tax dollars to the community.
Richard Scott, 57 Pleasant St. - Mr. Scott was present this evening to voice his strong opposition to the
moratorium which puts a hold on future development in the B-3 Zone. He believes that the standards in place currently
are sufficient to deal with the concerns in relation to the historic aspect of our great city. The moratorium or
amendments to the zoning would place further restrictions on development, and would hinder the growth and services
that would be provided to the citizens in our community, especially zoning for such developments. Mr. Scott felt that
this moratorium was a last ditch effort on the part of a select few who believe this proposed development would affect
their quality of life. This would prevent the rest of the community from having much needed services available to them
now and in the future. The current proposed development would not only provide those services would bring much
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 8
needed tax revenue to the city, increase property values in the area and replace two run down out of business facilities
on that lot. Mr. Scott strongly urged the Council to dismiss the proposed moratorium tonight for the good of the city
and the citizens.
William Kany, 3 Blackberry Lane from Smith, Elliot, Smith & Barney Law Firm – Mr. Kany was here this
evening on the behalf of Mr. and Mrs. David Lowe. The city has 17 pages of site plan review rules in place currently
to deal with this project. The city has a tremendous Planning Dept., and a very strong Planning Board right now who
enforce these rules. Mr. Kany had worked on the previous proposed CVS project for four years before receiving final
approval. CVS pulled out of that project because of the restrictions imposed upon them by the city and the DOT. The
Planning Board also has design review standards which developments must also adhere too. The following design
standards are intended to enhance and improve the exterior appearance of commercial and multi-family buildings on
sites in order to:
1) Protect and encourage Saco’s cultural, architectural and visual resource in order to preserve and promote a desirable
environment for the citizens in the region.
2) Prevent the kind of business districts in neighborhoods and maintain or upgrade building quality.
3) Preserve and reinforce the natural historic and architectural qualities of business districts of neighborhoods.
These are in many respects subjective standards that are enforced by the Planning Board and imposed upon developers,
to make the buildings be consistent with the architectural nature of the communities and neighborhoods they are being
put in. Some of the concerns that have been expressed tonight by the proponents of the moratorium include the:
Historic Districts, hours of operation, dumpsters, lighting, snow removal, deliveries, and traffic. All of these get
reviewed through the Planning Board. They are not functions of the legislative body. Mr. Kany reviewed a few of the
provisions of the Comprehensive Plan: 1) Section #17-16 (#15) - The city should continue to designate the Elm Street
side of the Saco Valley Shopping Center area with the commercial district and encourage the full utilization of this area
as a huge shopping center. The city should however resist at best to expand the shopping center into established
residential neighborhoods. 2) Section #17-23 - Looking forward to the main use in the future of the downtown. This
designation covers the historical downtown area of the city which is intended to allow mixed use. In this area the city
should encourage the reuse and redevelopment of existing buildings and the construction of new buildings for retail
service offices, community and multi-family residential use. The development standards for this area should require
that buildings be of urban character and allow for shared public parking. This designation is comparable to the current
B-3 zone district. All the rules are in place to allow this to happen. Moratoriums delay projects, so that eventually they
may not happen. Let the system work. If it isn’t broken, do not fix it.
Tim Ly, Owns buildings on Elm & Pleasant Streets and Lives in Portland – Mr. Ly stated that the developer is
working with him and the 17 tenants in his buildings to find new housing. He has been working to refurbish his
buildings, but some are just too run down and it is tough to put money into them because they don’t generate income.
He stated that he has a good name and would like to keep it, and wants to make sure the tenants are taken care of.
John Woodbury, 53 Pleasant St. – Mr. Woodbury has lived there since 1945. Mr. Woodbury is opposed to the
moratorium. He feels that you can’t stop progress. He and his sickly wife live in a 7 room home which is too big for
them. It will enable him to get rid of the big house and invest in a one floor ranch.
Councilor Lovell moved, Councilor Smith seconded to close the Public Hearing. The motion passed with
unanimous consent.
Each Councilor stated whether they were advocates or opposed to the moratorium. The Mayor also stepped down
from the podium to speak as a citizen. Deputy Mayor Ronald Morton took over the podium.
Councilor Cote moved, Councilor Bastille seconded that Mayor Roland Michaud return to the podium as Mayor.
The motion passed with six (6) yeas and one (1) nay – Councilor Smith. Councilor Lovell moved, Councilor Smith seconded that a 60 day moratorium on commercial construction in a B-3
Zone be adopted. The motion failed with two (2) yeas and five (5) nays - Councilors Lovell, Cote, Tardif, Bastille
and Morton.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 9
A copy of the complete “Moratorium Ordinance regarding construction of Commercial Buildings in excess of 5000
square feet in the B-3 District” in on page 30 as Attachment C.
ATTEST:_______________________________
Michele L. Hughes, Deputy City Clerk
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 10
ATTACHMENT A
CCCIIITTTYYY OOOFFF SSSAAACCCOOO
PPPRRROOOCCCLLLAAAMMMAAATTTIIIOOONNN:::
FFFAAAMMMIIILLLYYY DDDAAAYYY––– MMMOOONNNDDDAAAYYY SSSEEEPPPTTTEEEMMMBBBEEERRR 222888,,, 222000000999
WHEREAS: the use of illegal and prescription drugs and the abuse of alcohol and nicotine
constitute the greatest threats to the well-being of America's children; and
WHEREAS: 14 years of surveys conducted by The National Center on Addiction and Substance
Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University have consistently found that the more often
children and teenagers eat dinner with their families the less likely they are to smoke,
drink and use illegal drugs; and
WHEREAS: frequent family dining is associated with lower rates of teen smoking, drinking, illegal
drug use and prescription drug abuse; and
WHEREAS: the correlation between frequent family dinners and reduced risk for teen substance
abuse is well documented and
WHEREAS: parents who are engaged in their children’s lives – through such activities as frequent
family dinners – are less likely to have children who abuse substances.
WHEREAS: family dinners have long constituted a substantial pillar of family life in America
NOW, THEREFORE, Mayor Michaud and the City Council do hereby proclaim the fourth Monday of
every September as:
Family Day – A Day to Eat Dinner with Your Children, and urge all citizens to recognize and participate in its observance.
Signed this 21st day of September, 2009
____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ _____________________________________
____________________________________ SACO CITY COUNCIL & Mayor Roland Michaud ____________________________________
Official City Seal Affixed Here
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 11
ATTACHMENT B
Amendments to Chapter 15, Funds, dated August 3, 2009
(Please note that underline represents new language while strikethrough represents languate to be deleted.)
Chapter 15, Funds
Article I, City of Saco Trust Funds
§ 15-1. Scope; Board of Trustees.
The several trust funds known as the "Sweetser Provident Fund," "Sweetser Baxter Sabbath School Fund,"
"Sweetser School Fund," "Sweetser School Library Fund," "Sweetser Missionary Fund" and "Sweetser Park Fund"
and all trust funds for the benefit of Wardwell Home, now held by the City of Saco as trustee, together with all
legacies, devises and gifts of funds or property which the City of Saco may hereafter receive into its custody as
trustee, excepting such legacies, devises or gifts of funds or property which the City may receive for the benefit of
the Lucia Kimball Deering Hospital Fund, are hereby placed in the care, custody and administration of the citizens
of the city, who shall constitute a Board of Trustees for the care and administration of these funds and other
property and the income thereof and so be designated as the Board of Trustees for the care, custody and
administration of trust funds held by the City of Saco as trustee.
§ 15-2. Election; terms of office. Membership and Term
The Board of Trustees shall consist of three members, all being citizens of the city of Saco. Members shall be
appointed by the Mayor with City Council confirmation, for a term of six years, beginning initially with (1) one
member being appointed for six years, (1) one member being appointed for four years, and (1) one member being
appointed for two years. be elected by the City Council by majority vote, by written or printed ballots, at the next
regular monthly meeting of the City Council. Each trustee shall serve a term of six years, except that, starting
January 1, 1962, the trustee who has served the longest term shall retire on January 1, 1964, the next longest-term
trustee shall retire on January 1, 1966, and the newest trustee appointee shall retire on January 1, 1968. No trustee
shall be eligible for reappointment until a period of two years has elapsed after his/her retirement.
§ 15-3. Qualifications; bond.
Before assuming the duties of office, each member of the Board of Trustees shall be qualified by taking an oath
before the City Clerk that he/she will faithfully perform the duties of this office and shall file a bond with a surety
company authorized to do business in the State of Maine as surety in the sum of $10,000, conditioned for the
faithful performance of such duties. The premium to be paid to the surety company for the bond shall be paid by the
city.
§ 15-4. Meetings; compensation. [Amended 5-15-2000]
The Board of Trustees shall hold regular meetings of the Board on a semi annual basis on a date of the Board’s
choosing, or meetings can occur on an as needed basis. the last Saturday of each month. The Trustees shall receive
a compensation that shall be established by the Council after a public hearing and shall be entitled to be paid actual
and necessary expenditures incurred in behalf of the Board.
§ 15-5. Vacancies.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 12
Vacancies on the Board of Trustees, however occurring, shall be filled by mayoral appointment and confirmation
of the City Council. holding an election, using written or printed ballot, and by a majority vote of the City Council
at the regular monthly meeting of the City Council held after such vacancy occurs or at an adjourned session
thereof. A member elected appointed to fill a vacancy on the Board of Trustees shall hold office for the unexpired
term of the retiring member.
§ 15-6. Officers; rules.
The Board of Trustees may organize by the election of such officers as it may deem proper and shall determine
such rules as it may deem wise for the conduct of its business and which are not inconsistent with law.
§ 15-7. Records and reports; audit.
The Board of Trustees shall keep a record of its proceedings, including its financial transactions, and at the end of
the City fiscal year shall prepare a statement of the trust funds and other property held by the City of Saco as trustee
as enumerated in § 15-1, the income thereof and the entire financial transaction, which shall be delivered to the
Finance Director and also shall be published in each annual report of the City of Saco. The City shall pay for and
have conducted an audit of the Board's records. The audit shall be included as part of the city's annual audit.
§ 15-8. Investments.
The Board of Trustees shall invest all trust funds held by the City of Saco as trustee, as enumerated in § 15-1, in
such securities as the savings banks of Maine are authorized to invest in, excepting that the Board is authorized to
receive and hold such securities and other property as the representatives of any estate or any donor may deliver to
the City as trustee, other than legacies, devises or gifts of funds or property for the benefit of Kimball Hospital or
for hospital purposes, and to reinvest the whole or part thereof as the Board may deem wise.
§ 15-9. Additional powers and duties.
A. Notwithstanding the provisions of any of the preceding sections, the Board of Trustees is authorized to:
(1) Treat any two or more of the trust funds as a single fund, solely for the purpose of investment.
(2) After deduction of management expenses, prorate any interest earned or capital gains realized among the
various trust funds.
(3) Designate, in writing, a trust company or national bank agency having its principal office within the state,
for the purpose of investment, and the Board of Trustees may consent to the investment of such funds in a
common trust fund maintained by that trust company or bank for investment, as directed by the Board of
Trustees, in accordance with the provision of 9 M.R.S.A. § 51, the law governing savings banks
investments.
B. The Board of Trustees may enter into a custodian and agency agreement with a trust company, or bank, or
agency as provided in Subsection A(3) above, and contract for investment advice for the standard fee for this
service. The City Council shall establish a rate, after a public hearing, for the cost of the services of the bank as
custodian and investment adviser. Any other expenses resulting from these services or other expenses incurred
for transfer, sale, exchange or handling of these funds will be deducted from the income as management
expenses. [Amended 5-15-2000]
ARTICLE II, Lucia Kimball Deering Hospital Fund
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 13
§ 15-10. Board of Trustees.
The City of Saco, by special election held on the second Monday of September 1917, as authorized by Chapter 95
of the Private and Special Laws of the State of Maine of the year 1917, having voted to accept the legacies and
bequests of Lucia Kimball Deering as provided in the last will and testament of said Lucia Kimball Deering, dated
November 19, 1915, said legacies and bequests, devises and gifts, which the City of Saco, Maine, is or may be
authorized to accept, under the provisions of said Chapter 95 of the Private and Special Laws of the State of Maine
of the year 1917, are hereby placed in the care, custody and under the administration of seven citizens of the City of
Saco, who shall constitute a Board of Trustees for the care, custody and administration of these funds and the
income thereof and to be designated as the "Board of Trustees for the care, custody and administration of the
legacies and bequests provided for under the terms of the will of Lucia Kimball Deering" and all other legacies,
bequests, devises or gifts to the said City of Saco for hospital purposes.
§ 15-11. Election; vacancies. Membership and Term.
The Board of Trustees shall consist of seven members, all being citizens of the city of Saco. Members shall be
appointed by the Mayor, with City Council confirmation, for a term of six years, beginning as each current
member in 2009, found on file with the City Clerk, concludes their lifetime term - initially with (2) two
members being appointed for six years, (2) two members being appointed for four years, and (3) three members
being appointed for two years. be elected by the City Council collectively, by a majority vote of all members of the
City Council, by written or printed ballot, at the next regular meeting of the City Council or at an adjourned session
thereof held subsequent to the approval of this article. Vacancies that occur in the Board of Trustees by death,
resignation or removal from the City of Saco or by failure to qualify as provided in § 15-12 shall be filled in the
same manner.
§ 15-12. Qualifications; bond.
Each member of the Board of Trustees, before assuming the duties of this office, shall be qualified by taking an
oath before the City Clerk of the City of Saco that he/she will faithfully perform the duties of this office. The Board
shall file a joint bond with such sureties and in such sums as the City Council may deem just and proper.
§ 15-13. Compensation. [Amended 5-15-2000]
Each member of the Board shall serve with compensation that shall be established by the City Council, after a
public hearing, from income from the fund. If the income does not equal the amount necessary to pay such
members, then the pay will be proportioned according to the income, and, in addition, each member shall be
entitled to be paid for his/her actual cash expenditures incurred in behalf of the Board.
§ 15-14. Meetings; officers; compensation and bond of Treasurer.
The Board of Trustees shall hold monthly meetings at such times and place as the Board shall determine and, at
the first meeting thereof after the election and qualification of the entire Board of Trustees, shall elect a President,
Secretary and Treasurer from its own members. The Treasurer shall give to the Board a bond as Treasurer, in such
sum and with such sureties as the Board shall deem just and proper. The compensation of the Treasurer shall be 1/8
of 1% of the gross amount of the fund and of the income thereof, annually, to be paid from the fund.
§ 15-15. Rules and orders.
The Board of Trustees shall make such rules and orders as it may deem wise for the conduct of its official business
and which are not inconsistent with law or this article.
§ 15-16. Records.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 14
The Board shall keep a true and perfect record of its proceedings, including its financial statements and operations,
which at all times shall be open to the inspection of the Committee on Finance of the City Council.
§ 15-17. Investments.
The Board shall invest all funds in its custody and the income thereof only in such securities as the savings banks
of Maine are authorized to invest in, and is authorized to receive into its custody and hold such securities and other
property as the representatives of any other estate or any donor may hereafter deliver to said City of Saco for
hospital purposes and to reinvest such parts of the same as the Board shall deem wise in like manner.
§ 15-18. Yearly statement.
The Board shall prepare, at the end of each calendar year, a true and perfect statement of the funds and other
property in its custody and the income thereof and its entire financial doings and transactions, the same to be
included and published in the annual report of the City of Saco next published after the filing of the report with the
City Council. Upon the filing of the statement or report of the Board of Trustees to the City Council, it shall be the
duty of the Committee on Finance of the City Council to immediately examine and check up the securities and
other property in the care and custody of the Board of Trustees, subject, however, to all the provisions of this
article.
_______________________End of the Amendments to Chapter 15, Funds document______________________
TRUST FUND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Eric Purvis, CPA, current member to be appointed to a 6 year term on 9/21/09
9 Cartier Circle, Saco, Maine 04072
Audrey Milne, current member to be appointed to a 4 year term on 9/21/09
50 Summer Street, Saco, Maine 04072
Elizabeth McKenna, current member to be appointed to a 2 year term on 9/21/09
18 Lewis Lane, Saco, Maine 04072
MEMBERS OF THE LUCIA KIMBALL DEERING HOSPITAL FUND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Tim Murphy, Esq. most recent member appointed July 6, 2009
37 Beach Street, Saco, Maine 04072
Thomas Wells, Vice President, Christopher Way, Saco, Maine 04072
James Nelson, President
Bob Quentin, Treasurer
Sally Huot, Secretary
Erwin Warren
Diana Huot
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 15
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 16
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 17
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 18
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 19
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 20
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 21
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 22
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 23
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 24
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 25
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 26
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 27
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 28
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 29
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 30
This letter was also sent to Audrey Milne and Eric Purvis of the Trust.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 31
ATTACHMENT C
MORATORIUM ORDINANCE
REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS
IN EXCESS OF 5000 SQUARE FEET IN THE B-3 DISTRICT
September 21, 2009
The City of Saco City Council enacts a Moratorium Ordinance as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Saco is under threat of increased development pressure in its downtown business
district, which is comprised of the B-3 zone, by the construction of new buildings and parking lots out of scale and
character with surrounding neighborhoods, which development, if unregulated, could have detrimental impacts on
the city’s downtown;
WHEREAS, such developments may intrude upon the character of residential neighborhoods of the
downtown and may cause negative traffic impacts;
WHEREAS, this development pressure and its impacts were unanticipated and have not been adequately
provided for in the City’s current zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, there is a strong likelihood that the City will continue to be subjected to this development
pressure due to the lack of adequate regulations or restrictions on the location and size of commercial buildings in
the B-3 district; and
WHEREAS on September 8, 2009 the Council referred this issue to the Planning Board to develop a
proposal to address these issues; and
WHEREAS, amendments to the zoning ordinance require study and a public hearing by the Planning Board
and a public hearing and at least two other meetings of the City Council following the Planning Board’s
recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the City will need at least 180 days to identify and to analyze the associated issues and then to
develop and implement any necessary amendment(s) to the zoning ordinance to address these issues; and
WHEREAS, in the judgment of the City Council, these facts create an emergency within the meaning of
30-A M.R.S.A. § 4356(1)(B) and require the following Moratorium Ordinance as necessary for the preservation of
the public health, safety and welfare;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Saco City Council hereby ordains that a moratorium is hereby imposed,
effective immediately and applicable, to the maximum extent permitted by law and subject to the severability
clause below, to all applications for construction of new commercial buildings in excess of 5000 square feet in the
B-3 district that have not received a substantive review within the meaning of 1 M.R.S.A. § 302 as of September 8,
2009 (the date on which the public hearing on the this Moratorium Ordinance was first proposed and the hearing
date approved by the City Council) and to any application for such building until the effective date of the necessary
amendments to the zoning and other land use ordinances or March 5, 2010, whichever occurs first.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, Code Enforcement
Officer, all City agencies and all City employees shall neither accept nor approve applications, plans, permits,
licenses, and/or fees for any new or amended uses governed by this Moratorium Ordinance for such construction
for said period of time.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 32
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that those provisions of the City’s zoning and other land use ordinances
and any other regulations that are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Moratorium Ordinance are
hereby repealed, to the extent that they are applicable, for the duration of the Moratorium Ordinance hereby
ordained, but not otherwise; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that to the extent any provision of this Moratorium Ordinance is deemed
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of the Moratorium Ordinance shall remain valid.
EMERGENCY CLAUSE/EFFECTIVE DATE:
In view of the emergency cited in the preamble, this Moratorium Ordinance shall take effect immediately
upon passage by the City Council, pursuant to the terms of Section 2.10 of the City Charter, and shall apply, to the
maximum extent permitted by the law, but subject to the severability clause above, to the construction of new
commercial buildings in excess of 5000 square feet in the B-3 district that have not had a substantive review as
defined in 1 M.R.S.A. § 302 as of September 8, 2009.
______________________End of Moratorium Ordinance document_____________________
September 10, 2009
To: Saco Planning Board
From: Peter Morelli
Re: B-3 zoning, consideration of City Council referral
The City Council on September 8, 2009 made the following referral to the Planning Board:
Move to refer to Planning Board consideration of amendments to the Saco Zoning Ordinance related to size
and character of new development in the B-3 district. The Planning Board’s review should include consideration of
the mixed use character of the neighborhood in the B-3 district, whether portions of the district are more residential
in character, the depth of the commercial district along Elm Street, protecting the pedestrian nature of the
downtown, traffic impacts, the language in the Comprehensive Plan related to the Elm Street area, the issues of
single story and multi-story buildings. The Planning Board should consider techniques such as size limitations on
new commercial construction, rezoning portions of the district, and other zoning and design review techniques that
it may consider appropriate. The Council asks that this review be completed within 60 days.
The B-3 Downtown Business District is the city’s central business district including properties on east side
of Elm and Main Streets, and in between, as well as other areas on the east side of Main Street. A map is provided.
The Saco Valley Shopping Center is in a separate B-1 district.
The item was on the August 31 agenda at Mayor Michaud’s request for referral to the Planning Board of a
narrower question – a ban on commercial building over 5,000 feet in the district. The Council declined on August
31 to refer without a workshop. On September 8 it work shopped the item and then voted for the referral above.
In addition the Council is considering a moratorium and perhaps a retroactivity provision. The moratorium
will be considered as an emergency ordinance on September 21, when a public hearing will be held. That is
moratorium is likely to be considered again as a normal adoption, after a referral to the Planning Board. An
emergency ordinance can be in force for 60 days before renewal. A moratorium can be in force for 180 days total,
before renewal.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 33
As the Planning Board can see from the Council’s referral, the Mayor and Council have concerns about the
character of development in the B-3 district. The Council would like the Planning Board to analyze the issue and to
develop ordinance language to address aby issues of concern.
Councilors expressed several views agreed on the exact nature of the issue, but based on their comments
and those of Mayor Michaud, and the comments of citizen Mark Johnston, who asked the Mayor to take up the
issue, the Planning Board may wish to consider several issues related to whether a project being contemplated on
the east side of Elm Street between Pleasant and Temple is out-of-character with the neighborhood. Beyond the
specifics of the referral, these include scale, historic preservation, traffic and pedestrian access.
There is a property assembly in that neighborhood that would lead to a one-story, approximately 13,225
square foot building with 55 parking spaces for a chain pharmacy. If the Planning Board addresses these issues,
there are a number of possible actions to consider. The issue of how development and redevelopment of
commercial areas should occur has been discussed several times over the years. In preparing this memo, two
excerpts from the 1999 Comprehensive Plan seemed pertinent:
13. While development sprawl is usually associated with residential development, a similar pattern can
occur with respect to commercial development in which new retail and service uses are developed in outlying areas
that draw customers and sales from established business districts. The City of Saco desires to see its existing
commercial areas remain as healthy business centers and Downtown Saco revitalized. Therefore the City should
carefully manage the development of new commercial areas that might weaken the traditional downtown
commercial center.
15. The City should continue to designate the Elm Street/Saco Valley Shopping Center area as a
commercial district and encourage the full utilization of this area as a community shopping center. The City
should, however, resist attempts to expand the commercial district into established residential neighborhoods. (Page
17-16)
There has been little change in the relevant zoning districts since that was written, and the comp plan might
be read as endorsing the existing approach. At a street level perspective, however, the concept of not intruding on
residential areas should be considered. Several residential buildings along Pleasant, Elm, and Thornton, in varying
conditions, would disappear.
Design Review
The major change in the zoning ordinance since 1999 that would have an impact on this proposal is the
design review standards. A new commercial building now would be subject to design review by the Planning
Board. Good design might help to mitigate some development impact, but whether it can overcome the nature of a
building and parking lot and drive-in windows of this type and scale in all the locations in the district is certainly a
question worth asking.
Councilor Lovell asked how many commercial buildings is the B-3 district have a footprint larger than
5,000 square feet. Saco Biddeford Savings, Vic’s Appliance, and Atkinson’s seem to be the ones. About 10
multistory buildings in the district exceed 5,000 square feet.
The Planning Board might want to learn about the retroactivity that has been mentioned in connection with
this referral. Maine is probably unique among states in that courts have upheld retroactive zoning amendments in
two cases, in Portland and Kittery. Both were citizen initiated referenda. Attorney Natalie Burns indicates that a key
factor in both of those cases is that the parties had long notice of the proposed retroactive change. She thinks that
the Council could maximize the chances for retroactivity by adopting a moratorium on an emergency basis.
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 34
Additional information
The B-3 district has existed for about 25 years with only occasional tweaks. Councilor Lovell asked about
the differentiation with the nearby B-1 district. The B-1 is essentially the Saco Valley Shopping Center and appears
to have been created for that purpose on the site of a former lumber yard, although I have not researched it. The
ordinance, on one hand, makes these distinctions in some introductory language.
406-1. B-1 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
The B-1 classification permits uses which would normally require more space than is available in an urban
core area. The purpose of this district is to encourage desirable businesses in proximity to the urban core
where they may be readily accessible and to provide a variety of lot sizes and building types not generally
available in the central business district. (Amended 1/3/95)
406-3. B-3 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT
The B-3 classification permits high value business and services of the type needed within walking distance of high
density residential dwelling, and which may also serve a regional financial, service, or retail role. The intent of this
district is to concentrate urban businesses and residences in a core area so that each will complement the other.
On the other hand, if one looks at the use lists for the two districts they are very similar. There is some difference in
the treatment of fast food and drive-in windows, those being less suitable for the central business district and more
suitable for a shopping center.
Some additional Comprehensive Plan language:
Downtown - This designation covers the historical Downtown area of the City and is intended to
allow high intensity, mixed use in an urban setting. Within this area, the City should encourage the
reuse and redevelopment of existing buildings and the construction of new buildings for retail,
service, office, community, and multifamily residential use. The development standards for this
area should require that buildings be of an urban character and allow for shared and/or public
parking. This designation is comparable to the current B-3 zoning district.
General Business - This designation is intended to allow retail, service, and office uses in an
automobile environment in locations in and near the built-up area of the City. The focus of these
areas should be on providing the goods and services needed by residents of the City and nearby
communities. (Page 17-24)
Attached:
Map
B-3 Use List
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 35
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDFConverter\temp\NVDC\A24E8A4E-7E57-4C51-B0F7-E63A85A316C7\024f7baf-2308-4584-
b99c-a9705de99bb8file.doc 9/24/2009 36