Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
State Title V Workforce Development Survey: Title V Staff Functions and Vacancies and
Training Needs, Professional Development, and Graduate Education Strategies by Region
August 2009 Seeking to better understand and address state Title V Maternal and Child Health (MCH) and Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs (CYSHCN) workforce and leadership needs, the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP) and the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), with support from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) surveyed these programs between May and August 2008. Both programs in all 59 jurisdictions were requested to complete a web-based survey instrument that would provide a national profile of the state programs’ components and functions, and would indicate priority needs and preferred strategies with respect to workforce development. All 50 states and the District of Columbia provided at least one program response; of these, 49 MCH (96 percent) and 44 CYSHCN (86 percent) programs completed the survey. Four of the eight U.S. territories completed the survey.1 This document is intended for use by MCHB Training Grant applicants to inform regional graduate education needs. The data is only to be used for this purpose and is not to be shared or made publishable. If any data from this document is used, please reference the data accordingly. Please see the recommended citation below. The document presents select portions of the survey specifically presenting data by region, excluding territories. The data presented includes:
• Title V staff functions;
• staff supervised;
• vacancies;
• positions difficult to fill and barriers;
• program activities under Title V administration;
• knowledge/skill areas of greatest need for training of state level program staff;
• strategies, preferences and barriers for providing professional development/continuing education; and
• formal graduate education for program staff. Other profiles based on preliminary findings, of state MCH and CYSHCN program activity areas, functions and leadership, and of professional development strategies, preferences and barriers are available. The other profiles, AMCHP Issue Briefs, may be found by visiting the AMCHP website. AMCHP, ATMCH and MCHB will continue to partner with state Title V agencies and training programs to understand the data and apply the findings to address workforce and training needs. Recommended Citation Association of Maternal and Child Health (2009). State Title V Workforce Development Survey: Title V Staff Functions and Vacancies and Training Needs, Professional Development, and Graduate Education Strategies by Region. Washington, DC: AMCHP. Retrieved INSERT DATE, from www.amchp.org (Insert Final Link). Acknowledgement This project was partially supported through HRSA Grant U01MC00001 to the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP). Survey development and analysis were supported through AMCHP membership dues. This project received study approval by University of Illinois Office for the Protection of Research Subjects (#2007-0842). AMCHP appreciates the contributions of Alyssa
1 Three territories provided responses for both MCH and CYSHCN programs and one territory provided a response for MCH only.
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
2
Sharkey, Jenelle Partelow, and Holly Grason, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health to this profile, and the efforts of the AMCHP Workforce Development Committee who assisted with the survey design and guided presentation of these results. AMCHP is also appreciative of the state Title V programs for completing the survey.
Tables Showing Findings by Region (excluding territories) January 8, 2009
Title V Staff Functions and Vacancies and Training Needs, Professional Development, and Graduate Education Strategies
4. How long has the Director been at current organization?
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Average (years) Range
CYSHCN (5) 11.83 3 to 23 years I (6)
MCH (5) 12.28 1 to 27 years
II (2) Title V Combined (3) 21.19 20 to 22 years
CYSHCN (5) 24.32 2 to 41 years III (6)
MCH (6) 10.82 6 months to 29 years
CYSHCN (4) 10.19 3 to 30 years IV (8)
MCH (8) 16.29 2 to 31 years
CYSHCN (4) 14.85 8 to 23 years V (6)
MCH (6) 16.13 1 to 33 years
CYSHCN (3) 24.86 22 to 28 years VI (5)
MCH (5) 16.80 5 to 27 years
CYSHCN (4) 11.25 3 to 30 years VII (4)
MCH (4) 17.25 9 to 24 years
CYSHCN (6) 12.60 11 months to 27 years VIII (6)
MCH (6) 11.10 2 to 18 years
CYSHCN (4) 10.92 1 to 20 years IX (4)
MCH (4) 14.75 6 to 31 years
CYSHCN (4) 11.00 1 to 20 years X (4)
MCH (4) 4.96 3 to 7 years
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
4
5. How long has the Director been in current position?
Region (# states)
Program (# responses) Average (years) Range (years)
CYSHCN (5) 7.70 11 months to 23 years I (6)
MCH (5) 3.08 9 months to 7 years
II (2) Title V Combined (3) 3.77 3 to 6 years
CYSHCN (5) 9.05 2 to 15 years III (6)
MCH (6) 5.86 5 months to 16 years
CYSHCN (4) 3.83 6 months to 10 years IV (8)
MCH (8) 3.93 1 to 7 years
CYSHCN (4) 10.92 1 month to 23 years V (6)
MCH (6) 2.00 10 months to 3 years
CYSHCN (3) 5.25 3 to 6 years VI (5)
MCH (5) 10.78 11 months to 25 years
CYSHCN (4) 1.21 1 month to 3 years VII (4)
MCH (4) 9.35 4 to 12 years
CYSHCN (6) 5.10 1 to 8 years VIII (6)
MCH (6) 5.47 2 to 10 years
CYSHCN (4) 4.75 1 to 11 years IX (4)
MCH (4) 6.15 1 to 13 years
CYSHCN (4) 3.42 8 months to 7 years X (4)
MCH (4) 2.52 1 to 3 years
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
5
6. Which MCH/CYSHCN or related program activities are within your administration or management responsibilities? (Table continues on next page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Adolescent Health
Birth Defects/ Genetics
Direct Care
CYSHCN Program
Infant Mortality
Reduction (including
Healthy Start)
Infant/ Child Death
Review
Maternal Mortality Review
MCH Epidem-iology
Medical Home
Program
Early Childhood Compre-hensive System
(SECCS)
CYSHCN (5) 0 2 5 0 1 1 0 4 0 I (6)
MCH (5) 4 4 3 3 4 4 5 4 4
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
CYSHCN (5) 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 5 1 III (6)
MCH (6) 6 5 3 6 4 4 6 4 5
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 IV (8)
MCH (8) 7 5 4 7 7 6 7 1 8
CYSHCN (4) 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 V (6)
MCH (6) 5 3 2 6 6 4 5 3 6
CYSHCN (3) 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 VI (5)
MCH (5) 4 3 2 3 3 3 4 2 5
CYSHCN (4) 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 VII (4)
MCH (4) 4 3 2 2 3 2 3 1 4
CYSHCN (6) 2 4 6 1 0 0 1 4 1 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 5 3 3 2 3 3 5 2 4
CYSHCN (4) 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 IX (4)
MCH (4) 4 3 2 4 3 2 3 3 4
CYSHCN (4) 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 0 X (4)
MCH (4) 3 4 2 1 2 1 3 1 2
Number of regions indicating that activity is within responsibility
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
6
6. Which MCH/CYSHCN or related program activities are within your administration or management responsibilities? (Table continued from previous page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Newborn Blood Spot
Screening
Newborn Hearing
Screening
Women’s Health
Program for Care
Coordination and
Financial Assistance
Reproductive Health - including
family planning (Title X)
Domestic Violence (including
rape crisis)
Early Intervention
– Part C IDEA
MCH Surveillance (PRAMS,
YRBS, Birth
Defects Surveillanc
e, etc)
CYSHCN (5) 2 3 0 5 0 0 1 2 I (6)
MCH (5) 3 5 4 4 4 2 2 3
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
2 2 1 2 1 1 2 0
CYSHCN (5) 2 2 0 3 0 0 3 1 III (6)
MCH (6) 5 5 4 1 6 2 1 5
CYSHCN (4) 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 IV (8)
MCH (8) 6 5 7 3 7 3 4 3
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 V (6)
MCH (6) 3 4 4 0 5 1 3 3
CYSHCN (3) 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 VI (5)
MCH (5) 2 2 5 1 3 3 1 5
CYSHCN (4) 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 VII (4)
MCH (4) 3 4 1 1 3 1 1 2
CYSHCN (6) 4 5 1 5 0 1 1 4 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 4 3 5 2 6 1 1 4
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 0 3 0 0 2 1 IX (4)
MCH (4) 2 2 4 1 2 3 2 3
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 X (4)
MCH (4) 2 3 3 1 3 0 0 3
Number of regions indicating that activity is within responsibility
10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
7
6. Which MCH/CYSHCN or related program activities are within your administration or management responsibilities? (Table continued from previous page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Oral Health
Supplemental Security
Income (SSI) Disabled
Children’s Program
Transition Program
WIC (Women’s Infants and
Children Nutrition Program)
Childhood Injury
Prevention/ EMSC
Chronic Disease
Breast and Cervical Cancer
Home Care Waiver
Program
CYSHCN (5) 1 1 4 0 0 2 0 1 I (6)
MCH (5) 1 1 2 3 3 0 0 0
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 0 1 5 0 1 1 0 0 III (6)
MCH (6) 3 2 2 3 2 1 2 0
CYSHCN (4) 1 1 4 0 1 1 0 1 IV (8)
MCH (8) 6 1 3 6 4 2 4 1
CYSHCN (4) 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 V (6)
MCH (6) 3 1 1 3 2 1 0 0
CYSHCN (3) 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 VI (5)
MCH (5) 2 0 1 1 3 1 1 1
CYSHCN (4) 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 VII (4)
MCH (4) 0 2 1 2 1 0 1 1
CYSHCN (6) 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 4 0 2 4 3 0 1 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 IX (4)
MCH (4) 2 0 1 2 3 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 X (4)
MCH (4) 3 0 0 2 0 0 3 0
Number of regions indicating that activity is within responsibility
9 9 9 9 8 7 6 6
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
8
6. Which MCH/CYSHCN or related program activities are within your administration or management responsibilities? (Table continued from previous page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Immunization
Sexually Transmitted Infections (e.g. STI and STD education, screening, treatment,
Ryan White, etc.)
Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention
School Health
Blood Disorders
Child Protection
Community/Public Health Nursing
Community-based
Services
Foster Care
Services
CYSHCN (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I (6)
MCH (5) 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 III (6)
MCH (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 IV (8)
MCH (8) 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 V (6)
MCH (6) 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 VI (5)
MCH (5) 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VII (4)
MCH (4) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IX (4)
MCH (4) 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 X (4)
MCH (4) 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of regions indicating that activity is within responsibility
5 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 2
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
9
6. Which MCH/CYSHCN or related program activities are within your administration or management responsibilities? (Table continued from previous page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Special Nutrition Needs
Lead Poisoning Prevention
M& I Home
Visiting
Nutrition Assistance
Child Abuse & Neglect
Prevention
Child Health
Palliative Care
Services EPSDT
Perinatal Health
Direct intervention
(Clinics)
Minority Health
Program Other
CYSHCN (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I (6)
MCH (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
CYSHCN (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 III (6)
MCH (6) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 IV (8)
MCH (8) 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
CYSHCN (4) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V (6)
MCH (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
CYSHCN (3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 VI (5)
MCH (5) 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VII (4)
MCH (4) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
CYSHCN (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 IX (4)
MCH (4) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 X (4)
MCH (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of regions indicating that activity is within responsibility
2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
10
7. In your current position, what are the primary functions of the state level staff that you supervise? (Choose all that apply.) (Table continues on next page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Program evaluation
Program management
Workforce development
Assessment, planning and
policy
Data collection
and analysis
Public education
about MCH/health
Contract Management
Link clients with needed health care (Assure)
CYSHCN (5) 4 5 1 2 5 1 0 5 I (6)
MCH (5) 4 4 3 5 3 4 0 3
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
3 3 1 3 3 3 0 2
CYSHCN (5) 1 4 0 3 2 3 0 4 III (6)
MCH (6) 3 6 2 6 6 6 0 4
CYSHCN (4) 2 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 IV (8)
MCH (8) 5 8 6 6 6 7 0 7
CYSHCN (4) 4 3 2 4 4 3 1 4 V (6)
MCH (6) 6 6 4 6 4 6 0 4
CYSHCN (3) 2 1 0 2 2 2 0 2 VI (5)
MCH (5) 5 5 4 5 5 5 0 5
CYSHCN (4) 3 4 0 4 3 0 0 3 VII (4)
MCH (4) 3 4 2 4 3 4 0 3
CYSHCN (6) 5 5 2 5 5 6 0 6 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 6 6 2 6 5 6 0 4
CYSHCN (4) 4 4 2 4 3 2 0 4 IX (4)
MCH (4) 4 4 2 4 4 4 0 3
CYSHCN (4) 3 4 1 4 4 3 0 3 X (4)
MCH (4) 3 4 1 3 2 3 0 1
Number of regions indicating function as one of staff
10 10 9 8 8 7 6 6
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
11
7. In your current position, what are the primary functions of the state level staff that you supervise? (Choose all that apply.) (Table continued from previous page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Quality assurance/ Protective legislation
Surveillance Non-laboratory
research, demonstration
Direct intervention
(Clinics)
Does not supervise
staff
Services Authorization
and Payment
Community mobilizing
Other
CYSHCN (5) 4 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 I (6)
MCH (5) 4 2 0 0 0 0 3 0
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
3 3 2 0 0 0 1 0
CYSHCN (5) 2 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 III (6)
MCH (6) 5 6 0 0 0 0 3 0
CYSHCN (4) 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 IV (8)
MCH (8) 6 5 3 0 0 0 7 0
CYSHCN (4) 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 V (6)
MCH (6) 5 3 1 0 0 1 4 0
CYSHCN (3) 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 VI (5)
MCH (5) 4 5 4 0 0 0 3 2
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 VII (4)
MCH (4) 3 2 1 0 0 0 2 0
CYSHCN (6) 4 6 2 0 0 0 3 0 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 3 5 0 0 0 0 3 0
CYSHCN (4) 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 IX (4)
MCH (4) 3 3 2 0 0 0 4 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 X (4)
MCH (4) 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
Number of Regions indicating function as one of staff
4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
12
8. How many state level FTE program staff (non-secretarial) are under your administrative or management responsibility?
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
0 1-10 11-25 26-50 51-75 76-100 101-125 126+ Response
missing
CYSHCN (6) 3 2 1 I (6)
MCH (5) 1 2 1 1
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
1 1 1
CYSHCN (5) 1 2 2 III (6)
MCH (6) 1 1 1 1 2
CYSHCN (4) 1 1 1 1 IV (8)
MCH (8) 2 2 1 1 1 1
CYSHCN (5) 1 1 1 1 1 V (6)
MCH (6) 1 1 1 2 1
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 1 VI (5)
MCH (5) 1 3 1
CYSHCN (4) 3 1 VII (4)
MCH (4) 1 1 2
CYSHCN (6) 4 1 1 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 2 2 1 1
CYSHCN (4) 1 1 1 1 IX (4)
MCH (4) 1 1 1 1
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 1 X (4)
MCH (4) 1 1 1 1
Number of regions indicating current vacant positions within specific range
2 9 9 8 6 5 5 5 4
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
13
10. Please indicate the number of FTE vacant positions you currently have at the state level.
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
0 1-10 11-25 26-50 51-75 76-100 101-125 126+ Response
missing
CYSHCN (6) 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I (6)
MCH (5) 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 III (6)
MCH (6) 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IV (8)
MCH (8) 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
CYSHCN (5) 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V (6)
MCH (6) 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VI (5)
MCH (5) 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VII (4)
MCH (4) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (6) 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 IX (4)
MCH (4) 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X (4)
MCH (4) 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Number of regions indicating current vacant positions within specific range
8 10 3 1 1 0 0 1 4
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
14
11. Please list any specific types of positions that you have difficulty filling. (Table continues on next page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Epidemiology/ Research/ Statistics
Registered Nurses (Nurse Care Coordinators, Nurse
Consultants, Nurse Managers, Nurse
Practitioners and Public Health Nurses)
Administration/ Management
Physicians Social
Workers
Therapists (physical,
occupational, speech,
audiology, mental health)
Computer Technology/ Informatics
Nutritionists/ Dieticians
CYSHCN (6) 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 I (6)
MCH (5) 3 2 1 1 1 0 0 0
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
2 1 0 2 0 0 1 0
CYSHCN (5) 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 III (6)
MCH (6) 3 1 2 1 1 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 IV (8)
MCH (8) 3 6 0 2 1 1 1 1
CYSHCN (5) 0 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 V (6)
MCH (6) 2 4 0 1 0 1 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 VI (5)
MCH (5) 2 5 0 1 1 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 VII (4)
MCH (4) 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 1
CYSHCN (6) 1 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
CYSHCN (4) 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 IX (4)
MCH (4) 2 3 3 0 2 1 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 X (4)
MCH (4) 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of regions indicating difficulty filling specific type of position
10 10 6 6 5 4 3 3
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
15
11. Please list any specific types of positions that you have difficulty filling. (Table continued from previous page)
Other positions listed by respondents (in response to open-ended question)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Care Coordinators
Dentists Health
Educators
experienced professional staff possessing the
required credentials and work
experience
genetic counselor
MCAH economists
parent with a special needs child to assist
parents find the services they need
program support
assistant
CYSHCN (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I (6)
MCH (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 III (6)
MCH (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IV (8)
MCH (8) 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 V (6)
MCH (6) 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VI (5)
MCH (5) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VII (4)
MCH (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (6) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IX (4)
MCH (4) 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X (4)
MCH (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of regions indicating difficulty filling specific type of position
2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
16
11. Please list any specific types of positions that you have difficulty filling. (Table continued from previous page)
Other positions listed by respondents (in response to
open-ended question) None Blank/ Missing
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
quality assurance
WIC breastfeeding coordinator
CYSHCN (6) 0 0 1 0 I (6)
MCH (5) 0 1 0 0
II (2) Title V Combined (3)
0 0 1 0
CYSHCN (5) 0 0 0 1 III (6)
MCH (6) 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 1 0 IV (8)
MCH (8) 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 0 0 0 0 V (6)
MCH (6) 0 0 1 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 2 0 VI (5)
MCH (5) 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 2 0 VII (4)
MCH (4) 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (6) 0 0 0 1 VIII (6)
MCH (6) 0 0 1 0
CYSHCN (4) 1 0 0 1 IX (4)
MCH (4) 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 2 0 X (4)
MCH (4) 0 0 0 0
Number of regions indicating difficulty filling specific type of position
1 1 8 3
Additional notes relating to question 11:
• The Administration/Management category spans a range of positions including medical directors, program managers, program specialists, program evaluators, and health planners.
• Many states are looking to fill administrative/management positions with experienced public health professionals with advanced/specialty degrees. These responses included: Comprehensive Health Planner (master’s degree preferred along with data analysis skills), Medical Director with an MD, Health Planner with master’s degree, and MD/MPH.
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
17
• A number of states are specifically looking for experienced nurses (often with advanced degrees) for management positions. Responses included: Nurse Consultants, Nurse Program Managers, Family Planning Coordinator- RN masters preferred, Nurse Service Coordinators for CSHCN, nurse to manage the FICMR program, and public health nurses for state leadership roles.
• Many of the states stressed planning skills as qualifications they are looking for in administrative/management positions. Responses included: Comprehensive Health Planner, people with strategic planning skills, and Health Planners/Program Specialists.
12. Please indicate the barriers to filling vacant positions in your state.
(Table continues on next page) Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Non-competitive salaries
Limited credentialed
applicant pool
Limited years of experience of applicant pool
State hiring freezes
Unpopular geographic
area
Bargaining unit rules
Budget Restrictions
CYSHCN (6) 2 4 2 2 6 0 2 Region I (6) MCH (4) 2 3 3 2 3 1 1
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
2 1 0 0 3 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 Region III (6) MCH (6) 4 5 4 3 2 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 0 1 2 0 0 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 7 7 2 4 4 0 1
CYSHCN (5) 3 5 2 1 3 0 1 Region V (6) MCH (6) 2 4 1 3 4 0 2
CYSHCN (4) 1 4 3 1 2 1 0 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 4 5 3 5 3 1 1
CYSHCN (4) 1 3 2 1 2 0 0 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 3 3 2 3 0 0 0
CYSHCN (6) 3 5 5 2 1 1 0 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 4 3 3 2 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 4 4 3 0 2 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 3 3 2 0 0 1 0 Region X (4) MCH (4) 3 4 3 0 0 1 0
Number of regions indicating barrier
10 10 9 9 8 6 5
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
18
12. Please indicate the barriers to filling vacant positions in your state. (Table continued from previous page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Location State
regulations Cumbersome hiring process
Undesirable work
environment (limited
resources and flexibility)
No barriers experienced
Other Response
missing
CYSHCN (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Region I (6) MCH (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
1 1 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 Region III (6) MCH (6) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 1 2 0 0 1 1 0
CYSHCN (5) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Region V (6) MCH (6) 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (6) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Region X (4) MCH (4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of regions indicating barrier
4 4 2 2 2 3 2
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
19
14. Where is the greatest need for training of state level program staff (non-secretarial) in your Title V program? (Choose no more than THREE)
(Table continues on next page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Knowledge and skills for
designing and
conducting program
evaluations
Skills in writing;
especially synthesis
and translation
of MCH science for variety of audiences
Skills in systems
thinking (i.e., identifying the whole
situation and the
dynamics among parts)
Skills in using self-reflection techniques to
enhance program
development, scholarship
and interpersonal relationships
Skills in project
management (planning,
implementing, delegating
and sharing responsibility, staffing, and evaluation)
Knowledge about how personal attitudes,
beliefs, and experiences (successes
and failures) influence one’s
leadership style
Knowledge and skills
related to using
productive feedback
from peers and
mentors
Skills in translating data into
viable information
for MCH needs
assessment and planning
CYSHCN (6) 4 4 5 2 3 1 2 5 Region I (6) MCH (4) 4 3 4 2 3 2 5 4
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
3 2 2 2 1 2 3 3
CYSHCN (5) 5 3 2 5 2 4 2 4 Region III (6) MCH (6) 5 5 4 3 4 3 3 6
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 2 5 4 4 4 3 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 4 4 6 2 5 4 2 6
CYSHCN (5) 5 3 4 3 4 2 3 5 Region V (6) MCH (6) 4 3 6 3 3 3 3 5
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 1 3 2 5 1 3 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 2 3 4 2 3 3 2 4
CYSHCN (4) 3 4 2 2 1 2 3 1 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 4 4 3 1 3 1 1 2
CYSHCN (6) 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 5 5 2 4 4 4 3 5
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 2 1 3 2 2 3 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 2
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 Region X (4) MCH (4) 2 4 2 4 4 3 2 3
Number of regions indicating need as one of top three
10 10 10 10 9 9 9 9
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
20
14. Where is the greatest need for training of state level program staff (non-secretarial) in your Title V program? (Choose no more than THREE)
(Table continues on next page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Use of “family-centered care” constructs (e.g.,
shared decision-making; strengths-based
approaches) to critique and strengthen
practices, programs, or policies that affect MCH
population groups.
Strategies for incorporating
family centered and medical home
models of healthcare into
health professions and
continuing education curricula.
Skills in developing
and evaluating
policy options
Skills in translating policy into
organizational plans,
structures, and programs
Basic business and
administrative skills (related to
planning, funding, budgeting,
staffing, and managing health care systems and
organizations)
Knowledge about
strategies and
techniques in
successful negotiation
Skills in communicating
difficult or sensitive health
status information [in a manner that inspires and
motivates communities]
CYSHCN (6) 4 5 1 5 3 2 3 Region I (6) MCH (4) 3 3 0 4 2 3 1
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
1 3 3 1 3 1 1
CYSHCN (5) 2 3 4 3 2 4 3 Region III (6) MCH (6) 5 3 2 3 6 3 3
CYSHCN (4) 3 0 4 3 1 0 1 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 4 6 2 5 5 4 3
CYSHCN (5) 1 5 3 3 1 2 3 Region V (6) MCH (6) 4 2 3 2 3 4 4
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 1 4 3 2 3 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 4 4 3 4 2 3 5
CYSHCN (4) 1 2 1 2 3 1 0 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 1 2 2 1 2 0 3
CYSHCN (6) 4 5 3 4 0 4 2 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 2 4 3 3 1 3 4
CYSHCN (4) 2 4 2 2 4 3 1 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 2 2 3 1 2 0 2
CYSHCN (4) 3 2 2 4 2 1 2 Region X (4) MCH (4) 2 1 3 3 3 2 3
Number of regions indicating need as one of top three
9 9 8 8 8 7 7
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
21
14. Where is the greatest need for training of state level program staff (non-secretarial) in your Title V program? (Choose no more than THREE)
(Table continues on next page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Knowledge of cultural, ethnic, and
socioeconomic factors influence the access to health care
services
Solicit and use family partnerships in a
meaningful way in the design or delivery of
clinical services, program planning and
evaluation.
Skills in leading and/or staffing policy
working groups
Skills in group process facilitation
Skills in framing problems based on key
data (including economic, political, and
social trends)
CYSHCN (6) 3 2 2 2 4 Region I (6) MCH (4) 2 3 3 1 2
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
0 0 1 2 1
CYSHCN (5) 1 3 1 1 3 Region III (6) MCH (6) 1 3 4 3 6
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 3 2 1 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 3 5 3 4 4
CYSHCN (5) 0 3 2 4 3 Region V (6) MCH (6) 3 4 3 3 5
CYSHCN (4) 1 2 1 1 2 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 4 2 3 1 3
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 1 2 1 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 2 4 2 2 0
CYSHCN (6) 3 2 0 3 2 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 2 4 2 1 2
CYSHCN (4) 1 1 2 2 2 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 2 3 3 4 3
CYSHCN (4) 3 2 2 4 1 Region X (4) MCH (4) 1 1 3 2 2
Number of regions indicating need as one of top three
7 7 7 6 6
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
22
14. Where is the greatest need for training of state level program staff (non-secretarial) in your Title V program? (Choose no more than THREE)
(Table continues on next page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Knowledge about identifying signs of
stress and fatigue in self and others and use of personal reward and
rejuvenation
Skills in writing grant
proposals
Skills in effectively
resolving internal employee and/or
organizational conflicts
Skills in population health data
collection and analysis (MCH Epidemiology)
Knowledge of both Title V and non-Title V programs serving MCH populations (including history, current structures,
services, and limitations/gaps)
Medical home model for children, families,
providers, health care
systems, and health plans.
Skills in effective public speaking/
conveying ideas in a group
CYSHCN (6) 1 3 2 1 1 2 3 Region I (6) MCH (4) 3 1 1 0 1 2 3
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
2 2 1 2 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 1 3 3 2 0 2 1 Region III (6) MCH (6) 1 2 2 3 1 2 4
CYSHCN (4) 5 1 2 1 2 2 3 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 1 4 0 3 1 2 3
CYSHCN (5) 3 3 3 1 2 3 0 Region V (6) MCH (6) 2 2 2 3 2 2 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 1 2 3 0 3 4 1
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 1 0 3 1 2 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 2 1 1 0 1 3 2
CYSHCN (6) 3 5 3 1 1 2 2 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 4 3 1 1 1 1 2
CYSHCN (4) 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 0 3 1 2 3 1 1
CYSHCN (4) 1 2 1 0 1 3 1 Region X (4) MCH (4) 0 2 0 1 2 3 0
Number of regions indicating need as one of top three
6 4 4 4 4 4 3
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
23
14. Where is the greatest need for training of state level program staff (non-secretarial) in your Title V program? (Choose no more than THREE)
(Table continued from previous page)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Knowledge and skills for
identifying and determining the
scientific underpinnings and validity of evidence for
MCH interventions
Knowledge about strategies for
utilizing mentors/coaches
Skills in identifying
and facilitating
career options and opportunities for mentees
Skills in conducting
staff performance evaluations (including behaviors)
Knowledge and skills for quantitative
research (e.g., survey design and sampling
methodology)
Teamwork/ Collaboration
skills Bilingual skills
CYSHCN (6) 1 3 1 0 2 0 1 Region I (6) MCH (4) 3 2 1 0 2 0 0
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
1 0 0 1 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 Region III (6) MCH (6) 3 1 0 0 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 4 1 0 1 1 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 Region V (6) MCH (6) 2 1 1 2 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 4 1 0 2 0 0 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 4 0 0 1 1 1 0
CYSHCN (6) 2 1 3 1 2 0 0 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 5 3 2 2 2 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 Region X (4) MCH (4) 2 2 0 0 1 0 0
Number of regions indicating need as one of top three
3 3 0 0 0 0 0
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
24
16. Please identify the THREE knowledge/skill areas of greatest training need for your program staff (non-secretarial) at the state level.
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Critical Thinking
Leadership Development
Public Health / Title V
Knowledge Base
Management Communication Family Centered
Care, Medical Home
None needed for the state-
level staff in our state
CYSHCN (6) 4 3 4 2 2 2 0 Region I (6) MCH (4) 4 4 1 2 1 1 0
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
3 1 1 3 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 4 1 3 2 1 2 0 Region III (6) MCH (6) 6 2 3 4 1 2 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 0 3 1 2 0 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 7 7 2 5 1 2 0
CYSHCN (5) 4 2 1 1 4 0 0 Region V (6) MCH (6) 6 3 3 1 2 2 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 2 2 2 0 0 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 1 4 3 2 4 1 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 1 2 2 1 2 0 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 4 2 2 1 3 0 0
CYSHCN (6) 3 4 3 1 2 4 0 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 5 4 2 3 2 2 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 3 4 2 2 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 3 3 1 0 0 Region X (4) MCH (4) 3 3 2 2 1 1 0
Number of regions indicating knowledge/skill area as one of top three training needs
9 8 6 4 3 1 0
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
25
20. What methods of training do state level program staff prefer? (Choose no more than THREE)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
National conferences/
meetings, skills
building sessions (AMCHP,
Partnership, etc.)
1-3 day intensiv
e training
sessions with 25-
50 trainees
Regional meetings/ trainings
with multiple states
Webcasts
Blended learning (some time in person and some time using distance
methods)
State training sessions offered by external partners
Video conferencing
CD ROM
Web based distance learning courses
CYSHCN (6) 3 2 5 0 2 5 0 0 0 Region I (6) MCH (4) 2 3 4 2 2 4 0 0 0
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)*
0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 2 4 4 0 2 2 0 0 1 Region III (6) MCH (6) 4 3 5 2 2 1 0 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 2 1 2 1 2 3 0 0 1 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 5 4 6 1 4 1 2 0 1
CYSHCN (5) 3 2 2 0 4 1 0 0 0 Region V (6) MCH (6) 5 3 1 4 2 1 2 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 2 3 0 1 1 1 0 1 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 5 5 3 0 0 1 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0
CYSHCN (6) 6 0 4 2 1 3 2 0 0 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 5 1 2 4 1 2 2 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 1 3 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 3 2 4 1 0 2 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 2 4 0 0 2 0 0 1 Region X (4) MCH (4) 4 1 4 1 0 1 1 0 0
Number of regions indicating method as one of top three preferred
9 7 7 4 4 3 1 0 0
* The response for one Title V program for this region was missing for this particular question.
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
26
21. What are the three greatest barriers to providing training to non-secretarial state level program staff? (Choose no more than THREE)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Travel restrictions
Cost of continuing education programs
Difficult to take
time away from work
Limited geographic
access
Lack of adequate staffing to cover
while training
Lack of CEU credit availability
Lack of appropriate continuing education offerings
Staff perceive not important because CEUs not required
for license re-certification
No barriers to training
experienced
CYSHCN (6) 6 2 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 Region I (6) MCH (4) 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
3 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 3 5 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 Region III (6) MCH (6) 4 4 3 1 3 1 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 5 2 6 1 4 0 0 1 0
CYSHCN (5) 3 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 Region V (6) MCH (6) 6 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 4 1 5 3 2 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1
CYSHCN (6) 2 5 4 1 2 0 1 0 0 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 2 6 3 2 1 0 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 Region X (4) MCH (4) 3 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 0
Number of regions indicating barrier as one of top three
10 9 9 2 1 0 0 0 0
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
27
22. Which of the following strategies does your organization currently use to facilitate full or part time state level program staff (non-secretarial) in undertaking formal graduate education? Choose all that apply.
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Flexible hours to pursue
education
Tuition paid or
reimbur-sed
Release time
without pay
Release time
with pay
Partial/ Limited tuition
reimbur-sement
Sabbatical or long
term leave for
education
Additional education is
part of career ladder/
promotion potential
Formal graduate courses offered
on site at the SHA
On site Grand
Rounds w/CME
provided
No strategies
used
Options cut due to budget
constraints
CYSHCN (6) 3 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Region I (6) MCH (4) 3 3 2 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
3 2 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 3 2 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 1 Region III (6) MCH (6) 4 3 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 4 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 6 4 3 4 0 2 1 1 0 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 2 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 Region V (6) MCH (6) 4 2 3 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 5 1 3 5 0 2 1 0 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 3 3 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (6) 5 4 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 5 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 3 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Region X (4) MCH (4) 3 3 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Number of regions indicating strategy as important
10 9 8 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
28
23. If state level program staff (non-secretarial) have the opportunity to pursue graduate education, what are their preferred methods? (Choose no more than THREE)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Some form of blended learning, some on site, some distance
Part time on campus graduate education
Part time distance
education
Full time on campus graduate education (have
programs available close
by geographically)
Full time distance education
CYSHCN (6) 3 5 1 0 0 Region I (6) MCH (4) 4 2 2 0 0
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
2 2 2 0 0
CYSHCN (5) 4 4 1 2 1 Region III (6) MCH (6) 6 4 0 5 2
CYSHCN (4) 4 1 2 0 0 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 7 5 5 1 2
CYSHCN (5) 3 3 2 0 0 Region V (6) MCH (6) 5 3 5 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 3 2 2 1 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 3 4 5 1 0
CYSHCN (4) 1 2 3 0 0 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 2 2 3 0 0
CYSHCN (6) 6 3 3 0 1 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 5 3 3 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 2 2 2 0 0 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 0 0 0 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 3 1 0 0 Region X (4) MCH (4) 2 2 1 0 0
Number of regions indicating method as one of top three preferred
10 10 9 1 0
Tables showing findings by region (without territories) MCH/CSHCN State Workforce Survey 1-08-09
29
24. What are the three greatest barriers to state level program staff (non-secretarial) in undertaking graduate education? (Choose no more than THREE)
Region (# states)
Program (# responses)
Lack of career promotion
opportunities
No support (financial,
logistical) from our organization
to pursue graduate education
No ability to take leave
from work to pursue
graduate education
No geographic access to a face to face
graduate education program
No barriers to graduate education
experienced
Structural barriers in
institutes of higher
learning (e.g., no part-time academic
degree programs)
Agency doesn’t value
graduate education
No distance learning program
available in area of need
CYSHCN (6) 4 3 4 0 0 2 0 0 Region I (6) MCH (4) 4 3 1 1 0 2 0 0
Region II (2)
Title V Combined (3)
2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
CYSHCN (5) 3 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 Region III (6) MCH (6) 6 3 1 0 0 0 1 1
CYSHCN (4) 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 Region IV (8) MCH (8) 5 4 4 1 1 1 0 1
CYSHCN (5) 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Region V (6) MCH (6) 3 4 0 0 0 2 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 3 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 Region VI (5) MCH (5) 4 3 1 2 0 1 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 Region VII (4) MCH (4) 2 1 0 0 1 2 1 1
CYSHCN (6) 2 4 0 3 0 3 0 1 Region VIII (6) MCH (6) 4 3 3 3 0 1 0 1
CYSHCN (4) 0 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 Region IX (4) MCH (4) 1 2 4 2 0 2 0 0
CYSHCN (4) 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 Region X (4) MCH (4) 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of regions indicating barrier as one of top three problems
9 8 5 3 3 2 1 0