23
COLD TEST REVIEW AT/MTM Status of the SM18 Status of the SM18 Equipment Equipment A. Siemko On behalf of the MTM-TF Team

Status of the SM18 Equipment

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Status of the SM18 Equipment. A. Siemko On behalf of the MTM-TF Team. Outline. SM18 Equipment 2004 Summary and issues S4 Equipment Software/Hardware Consolidation Foresight 2005 : Risks of Mishaps Conclusions. Allocation of the 12 Test Benches. MB (SSS). F. E. MB. D. MB (SSS). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Status of the SM18 Equipment

COLD TEST REVIEW

AT/MTM

Status of the SM18 Equipment Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko

On behalf of the MTM-TF Team

Page 2: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

OutlineOutline

SM18 Equipment 2004 Summary and issues

S4 Equipment Software/Hardware Consolidation Foresight 2005 : Risks of Mishaps

Conclusions

Page 3: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Allocation of the 12 Test Benches

MB

SSS (MB)TBD2-S4

SSS (MB)TBB1-S4

MB

MB (SSS)

A

B

C

D

E

FMB (SSS)

Page 4: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Design Test Rate and ThroughputDesign Test Rate and Throughput

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Mar-02

Jun-02

Sep-02

Dec-02

Mar-03

Jun-03

Sep-03

Dec-03

Mar-04

Jun-04

Sep-04

Dec-04

Mar-05

Jun-05

Sep-05

Dec-05

Mar-06

Jun-06

Sep-06

Dec-06

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Average Test Capacity (magnets/month)

Accumulated Test Output

Simulation of 02/ 2003, see Chamonix 2003

Nominal Rate

Max Rate

Over last quarter of 2004: Nominal design test rate has been established Max. design test rate has been confirmed

Page 5: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Status of anticryostatsStatus of anticryostats

Type

Length

Nr. of units

Status

Dipole

16728

24

Nr.: ACD 01; 02; 03; 04; 05; 06; 09;10; 11; 12; 14; 15; 16; 17; 18; 20; 21; 22; 25; 26; 27; 28; 29; 30

Damaged 06; 18

SSS

7828

12

Nr.: ACS 01; 02; 03; 04; 05; 06; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 18

Damaged 01; 05

CFB

2809

28

Nr.: ACC 01; 02; 03; 04; 05; 07; 08; 09; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16; 17; 18; 19; 20; 22; 23; 24; 25; 26; 29; 30; 31; 32

SSS F2

11476

2

Nr.: AC.F2 01; 02

Page 6: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Status of ceramic shafts and TRU’sStatus of ceramic shafts and TRU’s

Type

Nr. of units

Status

Dipole shafts

9

Nr.: 22; 23; 24; 25; 26; 27; 28, 29; 30

OK; Not calibrated

SSS shafts

4

Nr.: 35; 36; 37; 38

OK; Not calibrated

TRU’s

7

Nr.: 01; 02; 03; 04; 05; 07

OK;

Page 7: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

S4 Equipment S4 Equipment Three Magnet Families for Testing Three Magnet Families for Testing

Taking into account magnet lengths, cold feet positions , jack positions, powering and availability of magnetic measurement systems, Special SSS units were grouped in 3 main families.

Families:

Family 1: 11670 mm, 10715 mm

Family 2: 9310 mm, 8335 mm

Family 3: 6935 mm, 5660 mm

Page 8: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Schematic view of the test bench with the extension module used for the 3rd family (6935 mm, 5660 mm)

Baseline layout on the SM 18 test Baseline layout on the SM 18 test benchesbenches

1275 mm

C

F

B

8293 mm

6935 mm

Extension

MRB

Module

5660 mm

Page 9: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

The test benches TBB1 and TBD2 are design and procured to accept magnets in 11 mechanical configurations

Dipole configuration Arc SSS configuration 9 S4 configurations

First four configurations were tested on TBB1 and relevant equipment commissioned

Page 10: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Chaconsa + SSW Chaconsa + SSW Layout for family 1Layout for family 1

Page 11: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Chaconsa or TRUChaconsa or TRULayout for family 3Layout for family 3

Page 12: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Equipment Dedicated to S4 TestingEquipment Dedicated to S4 Testing

The anticryostats

For the magnetic measurements on the test benches magnets must be equipped with the anticryostats

Anticryostats of three new lengths are required

The extension modules

For adapting one type of the anti-cryostat to several magnet lengths of one family, extension modules are required. They will be located between the magnet and the MRB

Three types of rigid extension are required

Wide aperture magnets (ø=70mm)

For Q4 in IR1,2,5,6,8; Q5 in IR2,4,6,8; Q6 in IR4, the adaptation pieces have to be developed in order to fix actual anti-cryostats in wider apertures.

Page 13: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

S4 and Arc SSS Anticryostat S4 and Arc SSS Anticryostat ProductionProduction

All components ready, except heating elements for S4 families

Missing heaters are due to be delivered these days (today!?)

Production of additional Arc SSS type anticryostats put on stand-by (waiting for the conclusions of this review)

Page 14: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

““Mobile” ChaconsaMobile” Chaconsa

All components procured and ready

First system assembled on TBB1 and pre-commissioned (Q9 – family 2)

Support structures of second system are under final assembly stage on the TBD2

Second Chaconsa put on stand-by.

Page 15: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Software and controls Software and controls consolidationconsolidation

Page 16: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Software and controls Software and controls consolidationconsolidation

Page 17: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Powering AspectsPowering Aspects

All essential equipment is operational All 13kA commuting switches were upgraded (motorized)

3 major incidents concerning 13 kA cables encountered over 2004 Repair has cost substantial effort and resources Preventive pressure test to be carried out

Two 60/120A commuting switches delivered this week for clusters TBB and TBD

Two 120A Power Converters are still missing

Page 18: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Worries and MishapsWorries and Mishaps

Although over 2004 all essential equipment was operational and obeying well the design-allocated downtime, the first examples of important equipment wear out and/or mishaps were experienced: Damage to the anticryostats Several brakes in case of measuring shafts Loss of several voltage taps integrated with the

current leads Severe wear out (damage) of the 13kA current

lead’s extremities

Page 19: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Worries and MishapsWorries and Mishaps Silver shoe – TBC2 Silver shoe – TBC2

Page 20: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Worries and MishapsWorries and MishapsSilver shoe – TBB1Silver shoe – TBB1

Page 21: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Worries and MishapsWorries and Mishaps Silver shoe – TBD2 Silver shoe – TBD2

Page 22: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Silver shoe crisisSilver shoe crisis

Series of actions launched, in particular:

Study of two repair scenarios Procurement of tooling for maintenance and repair Production of additional spare parts

Due to start soon:

Training of ICS operators Change of the installation procedures Procurement of the final tolling for changed

procedures (TS resources required!)

Regular preventive inspection and maintenance of the test benches after at most 10 magnet tests

Page 23: Status of the SM18 Equipment

A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005

Conclusions Conclusions Over 2004 all essential equipment was available and operational,

obeying well the design-allocated downtime, in particular this applies to:

Electronics and measuring systems for which the preventive maintenance is in place Powering – even though several significant mishaps Controls and software - even though several developments are not completed

Over the last quarter of 2004 the nominal design test rate for the 12 benches has been established and the max. design test rate has been confirmed

Dedicated S4 equipment (already procured and undergoing procurement) will allow to test in SM18 all types of the Special SSS’s

An economic solution was worked out Major R&D was not needed Most of the technologies and measuring systems were adapted (redeployed)

The silver shoe crisis receives at present particular consideration!

It has drawn attention to the importance of the preventive inspections and maintenance, even if not anticipated by the design