26
Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Stone DesignStone Design

Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14KMaterial in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K

Jon FrippNDCSMC

Ft. Worth, TX

Page 2: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Rock Design

• Uses of rock

• Sizing methods

• Examples

Page 3: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Why use rock?

High stress areasHigh riskEmergency situations

•Quick response•Ecological Implications?•Geomorphic Implications?

Page 4: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Why use rock?

Result: Static channel boundary.Is this what is needed?

Page 5: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Photo from Meg Jonas

Photo from Jim Ludlam

May be part of Streambank Soil Bioengineering

Page 6: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

USACE WES Rip Rap test facility

How Big?What Gradation?What Shape?What Density?What Quality?

What do we need to know?

If we are going to use rock – we need to do it right

Page 7: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Size

Answer: The particle size for which 50% of the sample is finer.

What is D50?

How big does the rock need to be?

Page 8: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Stone Sizing

FF = Force of flowing water

FD = Drag force

FL = Lift force

FW = Submerged weight

FC = Contact or interlock force

Empirical methods were developed for specific applications.

Page 9: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Stone Sizing

Bottom Line: Match the rock sizing method with the intended use.

Page 10: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

High vs. Low Energy

Page 11: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Mild slope - Low Energy

Steep Slope - High EnergyNote: there are exceptions

Page 12: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Parallel flow – low energy

Impinging flow – high energyNote: there are exceptions

Page 13: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

What variables do the equations account for?

•Usually stone size is the dependent variable•Is it part of a defined gradation?

•Independent variables can include:•Velocity•Depth•Energy slope•Bed slope•Side slope•Rock shape•Rock density•Others?

•Are those important?

Page 14: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

USGS

44.201.050

Vd Arizona field data where riprap performed without damage.

d50 is median stone size (inches)V is channel velocity (fps)

Page 15: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Report 108 – (1970)

4/50 eRSd Developed for roadside drainage channels.

d50 is median stone size (inches)Se is energy slope (ft/ft)R is hydraulic radius (ft)

Page 16: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

LANE’S Far West States Method

Page 17: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

USACOE - Maynord52

1

5

30

.

DgK

V.

WS

WDTCvCsCSFd

dm = Stone size (ft); m percent finer by weight

D water depth in feetCs Stability Coefficient Z=2 or flatter C=0.30Cs = Stability coefficient (0.3 for angular rock, 0.375 for rounded rock)Cv = Velocity distribution coefficient (1.0 for straight channels or inside of bends, calculate for outside of bends)CT = Thickness coefficient (use 1.0 for 1 D100 or 1.5 D50, whichever is greater))

USACE WES Rip Rap test facility

For slopes < 2%

Page 18: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

USACOE

R= center-line bend radius W = water surface width

)log(2.0283.1 WRCv

2

2

1 sin

sin1 K

rockangular for degrees) 40 (typically repose of angle

horizontalrock with of angle

Page 19: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

USACOE – Boulder Design

)1(

)(18

SG

Sdepthd f

d = Minimum stone size (ft) depth = channel depthSf = channel friction slope SG = specific gravity of the stone

EMRRP-SR-11

Page 20: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Abt Rock Design

23.535.1 43.056.050 SqD

D50 is median stone size (inches)S channel slope in (ft/ft)q is unit discharge (ft3/ft)

Slopes: 2% to 20%

Rock design for spillways or loose rock grade controlSteven R. Abt, and Terry L. Johnson (1991)

Page 21: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

529.05.150 923.112 qSD

0.02 < S < 0.1 For Slopes between 2% and 10%

ARS Rock Chutes

0.10<S<0.40

529.058.050 233.012 qSD

D50 is median stone size (inches)S channel slope ft/ftq is unit discharge (ft3/ft)

For Slopes between 10% and 40%

K. M. Robinson, C. E. Rice, and K. C. Kadavy (1998)

Page 22: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Rock Chute Design Spreadsheet

Page 23: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Given:GS = 2.65, Unit wt of stone 165.36 lb/ft3

Bottom Width = 40 ftn = 0.045Slope = 0.06 ft/ftDepth = 3.5 ft

Find:Appropriate rock size

Velocity = 16.7 ft/sQ = 2,340 ft3/sCritical Depth = 4.7 ft

Maynord D50 = 1.9 ftLane’s FWS D50 = 3.2 ftAbt and Johnson D50 = 1.3 ftARS rock chute D50 = 1.1 ft

Not appropriate for givens

Example Problem

Page 24: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Given:GS = 2.6Bend Radius = 350 ftChannel width = 50 ft Side slope = 2:1Slope = 0.01 ft/ftDepth = 5 ft

Find:Appropriate rock size using Lane’s FWS technique

Example Problem

Use graph in back of handout

Page 25: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Stone Sizing – Final Thoughts•Use a rock sizing method appropriate for your application

•Use several methods and look for convergence•But do not expect exact convergence

•Use a factor of safety appropriate for your situation

•Assess significant threats to life and property

•Size may need to be larger than what the equations indicate as sufficient to resist flows

•To resist ice and debris•For habitat enhancement•For aesthetic purposes•To reduce vandalism and theft

Page 26: Stone Design Material in this section is drawn primarily from NEH 654 TS 14C and 14K Jon Fripp NDCSMC Ft. Worth, TX

Questions?