Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    1/36

    STRATEGIC SECURITY FUTUREFOR INDO-ASIA-PACIFIC REGION

    Australia; The European Tiger

    Zorba Parer

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    2/36

    DEFININGTHE REGION

    A China centric view of the region is forming aroundclear data indicating a growth in all elements ofChinese national power

    Indo-Asia-Pacific as a hemispherical system

    Indo-Asia-Pacific maritime region

    The Indian Ocean maritime region

    The Pacific Ocean maritime region

    Mainland Asia

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    3/36

    SUB-REGIONS

    Asia North, East, South, West

    Indian Ocean SLOC to Africa, Middle East, Mediterranean, Europe,

    Asia and littoral regions Pacific Ocean

    SLOC to South America, North America, Siberia, Asia,and Pacific Littoral States

    Oceania Passage between Indian and Pacific oceans.

    SLOC to Australian east coast and New Zealand

    This is a region dominated by maritime geography,and transport economics.

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    4/36

    EXCEPTIONALISM

    Quadrella of exceptional States

    USA; Global hegemonic power, balancing costs ofmaintaining the Global Commons, with ability toinfluence State to State relations.

    China; Communist Billion Citizen State, seeking to risepacifically.

    India; Most populous democracy, seeking to ensurecontinued Indian Ocean dominance, and influencewithin the Asia land mass.

    Japan; forced demilitarisation, economic powerprojection, civil institutions with monopoly on use offorce within Japanese jurisdiction.

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    5/36

    ARTICLES REVIEWED

    Cooperation from Strength The United States,

    China and the South China Sea

    January 2012, Edited by Patrick M. Cronin

    Contributors, Patrick M Cronin, Peter A Dutton, M Taylor

    Fravel, James R Holmes, Robert D Kaplan, Will Rogers,and Ian Storey

    Power and Choice; Asian Security Futures

    Rory Medcalf

    International Relations of Asia (2008) Chapter 15 by Ralph A Cossa

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    6/36

    INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSOF ASIA

    No settled pattern of order in Asia. All the majorpowers are in processes of transition.

    Rise of China as single most significant contributorto regional change in Asian power structures.

    India rising, but not as quickly as China.

    Need for domestic structural reforms anduncertainties about how best to assert a moreactive international and regional role are evident inJapan.

    Russia trying to reassert its Asia presence.

    Continued reliance on US military dominance.

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    7/36

    INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSOF ASIA

    Growing Chinese pre-eminence

    Japan seeking to normalise as a nation

    India looking east, seeking a more active role in Asia-Pacific

    ASEAN; increasingly institutionalised, driving regionalcooperation

    Near term security issues Korean Peninsula tensions

    China-Taiwan tensions

    Continued importance of existing USA-Bilateral securityarrangements

    Geopolitical Considerations

    Regional geographical considerations

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    8/36

    INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSOF ASIA

    Pathways to the Future; Two Scenarios

    Continuation of current order, moderated by USAprimacy

    Dependent on massive military commitments to the region

    At risk of a declining USA economy Increased US involvement in regional multilateralism

    Multipolar system, with sub-regional hegemensdominating the Indo-Asia-Pacific region

    A weakening US

    Chinese band wagoning by US allied states

    Concert of powers possible (US, China, India, and Russia)

    Coalitions attempting to form a balance of powers.

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    9/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Main thesis - Cooperative Primacy

    Increased US Naval presence, contingent upon ahealthy US Economy.

    A new web of US security partnerships

    Peace and security assurance in the South China Sea

    Increased US economic engagement in the Region

    Increased focus on US-China relations, supporting rulesbased system of cooperation and dispute resolution

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    10/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    History as a record of Chinese geostrategiccentrality in Asia

    150 Years of political upheaval after Millennia ofChinese rule

    Chinese claims over South China Sea can beunderstood as a Greater Caribbean moment

    Constructivism anyone?

    Leading Asian arms modernisation

    Hemispherical economic dependencies

    Could China survive without Japan?

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    11/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Nations surrounding China, economically engagedand hedging USA as an offshore balancer

    US Chinese conflict not a favourable option for riskaverse minor nations: Australia, NZ, Papua, Indonesia.

    Produces bias against any China-US conflict. [Z} Australian Defence Budget as an indicator

    Submarines as the ultimate maritime presence

    Aerial surveillance and the age drones

    Air lift and emergency response

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    12/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    China rebuffs attempts to move the South ChinaSea disputes from regional to global forums

    Great power behaviour evident in Chinese movesto bilateral agreements, versus multilateral

    engagement Does USA movement to multilateral engagement signal

    a abdication of their Great Power status?

    Limits of Realism in an Institutionalised powerstructure?

    UNCLOS and other Customary International Lawstend to limit Great Power influence. Theoretical tangent: Is this an example of a self

    destructive tendency in Great Power behaviour? Selfenforcing natural laws?

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    13/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER II - MARITIME SECURITYINTHE SOUTH CHINA SEAANDTHECOMPETITIONOVER MARITIME RIGHTS

    Multiple state claimants over territory is a feature ofgeostrategic reality in the south China sea.

    US maritime predominance necessary.

    US Neutrality in Regional Dynamics Chinese Maritime realities

    ASEAN and Littoral Regions

    Conflict avoidance to balance policy for US foreign

    diplomacy

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    14/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER III - TREATIES

    History of Chinese sovereign claim.

    Chinese claims not supported by UNCLOS

    Maritime Resources

    Important fishing grounds Crude oil

    Natural Gas

    Sea Lane Security

    Chinese policy of reassurance, and bilateralagreements between claimants

    Engagement through ASEAN in multilateralappeasement, reversed after unpromising start

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    15/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER III - TREATIES

    China insists on bilateral approach

    No substantive agreements have been reached viabilateral approaches

    Other claimants prefer multilateral approach to

    balance Chinese influence

    Failure of the 2002 DoC; further talks

    China will continue blocking moves for arbitrationand 3rd party intervention

    China will continue asserting effective control overthe South China Sea in pursuit of its sovereign

    claims

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    16/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER IV -CRACKSINTHE GLOBAL FOUNDATION: INTERNATIONAL LAWANDINSTABILITYINTHE SOUTH CHINA SEA

    China asserting interests in ways which threatenthe normative global maritime commons

    China seeking to Shape CIL through Statebehaviour

    Challenges to established positions of UNCLOS

    Three pillars of Modern Globalisation

    Open, Market based access to resources and trade

    International Institutions fostering stability

    Stability in the Global Commons

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    17/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER IV -CRACKSINTHE GLOBAL FOUNDATION: INTERNATIONAL LAWANDINSTABILITYINTHE SOUTH CHINA SEA

    Managing the Maritime commons

    Right of access to the high seas

    Enshrined in UN Charter

    Constabulary role of Navies Multiple forms of State maritime jurisdiction

    Chinese anti-access policy towards SCS

    Regional Baselines

    Boundaries at or near the shoreline between a coastalstates fully sovereign territory and the maritime zones

    that extend seaward.

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    18/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER IV -CRACKSINTHE GLOBAL FOUNDATION: INTERNATIONAL LAWANDINSTABILITYINTHE SOUTH CHINA SEA

    China is seeking to change the rules and normsthat define maritime rights

    US and allies should act against this change

    US should ratify UNCLOS Great power multilateral dilemma?

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    19/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER V THE ROLEOF NATURAL RESOURCESINTHE SOUTH CHINA SEA

    Natural Resources

    Energy

    Fisheries

    Minerals

    The Challenge of Climate Change

    Dynamic interaction between Land and Maritimeresources

    Promoting regional stability Alternative Fuels

    Adaptive technologies

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    20/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER VI ROUGH WATERSFOR COALITION BUILDING

    US Maritime Strategy

    Good order at sea

    Three Principles:

    Preserving freedom of the Seas

    Ensuring uninterrupted flow of shipping

    Facilitating ready movement of goods and people accessacross US frontiers

    Current Maritime cooperation in SCS

    US assistance programs CARAT and SEACAT

    Challenges to Maritime coalition building

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    21/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER VI ROUGH WATERSFOR COALITION BUILDING

    500 years with a global maritime hegemon

    Portugal Holland England USA

    Multinational trusteeship (Multipolarity) would be anew phenomenon

    Dual nature of Navies makes it difficult todistinguish between Competitive and CooperativeState behaviours

    The China Factor

    Chinese policy assertions of indisputable sovereigntyover SCS islands and waters

    Failure of DOC

    Reactions to CARAT

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    22/36

    COOPERATIONFROM STRENGTHCHAPTER VI ROUGH WATERSFOR COALITION BUILDING

    Globalised economy relies of free flow of goods

    Southeast Asian states have territorial claims atstake

    Beijing view of vital interest against coalitions Washing should work bilaterally to uphold maritime

    security

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    23/36

    POWERAND CHOICEFUTURES

    Future 1: US Primacy

    Future 2: An Asian Balance of Powers

    Future 3: Concert of Powers

    Future 4: Chinese Primacy Shocks

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    24/36

    ZORBAS THOUGHTS

    Commitments made under ASEAN agree to pacificresolution of disputes.

    Arbitration offices provided.

    Disputes agreed through offsets in resolutions.

    Costs of providing courts as a common good.

    Dams as an example of transnational water disputes.

    Domestic constructivism

    Uncertainties arising from domestic politics

    Model Theories.

    Chinese Maritime presence

    http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/

    http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/
  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    25/36

    ZORBA THOUGHTS

    Secondary Effects - Cooperative Primacy

    Answer to increased traffic through Chinese waters, theenforcement agency grew.

    This has led China to effect control of East and South

    China Seas. Nuclear capabilities on Hainan Island lead to a South China

    Sea predominance.

    China continues to assert rights in these matters.

    Arbitration as an answer? Not likely, international laws

    currently favour the Chinese opposition. China has a negativebias in acceding to any international arbitration.

    Assertions of Exceptionalism.

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    26/36

    VIETNAM - MARITIME MOVEMENTS

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    27/36

    VIETNAM - MARITIME MOVEMENTS

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    28/36

    TAIWAN - MARITIME MOVEMENTS

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    29/36

    TAIWAN 8HRS LATER

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    30/36

    EAST CHINA SEA- MARITIME MOVEMENTS

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    31/36

    KOREAN PENINSULA

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    32/36

    JAPAN MARITIME MOVEMENTS

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    33/36

    JAPAN MARITIME MOVEMENTS

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    34/36

    DUTCH MARITIME MOVEMENTS

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    35/36

    MAJOR STRATEGIC FACTORS

    US military dominance

    Chinese resource demands

    Japanese economic power

    Indian resource demands Multiple minor to medium sized nations

  • 7/31/2019 Strategic Security Future for Indo-Asia-Pacific Region

    36/36

    MIDDLEAND SMALLSTATES

    State Survival

    Maintaining Sovereignty

    Balancing Great Powers

    Engagement through Multilateralism