Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    1/31

    9Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations

    Strategic Review, Evaluation, and Restructuring

    1

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    2/31

    Levels of Strategy: important distinctions

    Network

    Corporate

    Business

    Functional

    Ansoff

    Boston

    MatrixAlliances

    Mergers andAcquisitions

    2

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    3/31

    Four Different Organisational Approaches to

    Change / Growth Miles and Snow (1978)

    Prospectors Risk-takers, opportunity-seekers

    Almost continually search for market opportunities

    Defenders Keep existing products, protect market share

    Work with narrow product-market domains

    Analyzers Build on strengths, look for add-on options

    Often operate in two types of product-market domains, one

    relatively stable, the other changing Reactors

    Respond, dont look for change

    Top mangers frequently perceive change and uncertainty occurringin their organizational environments but are unable to respondeffectively

    3

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    4/31

    Ansoff Matrixchoosing strategies

    4

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    5/31

    Motives for Diversification

    5

    Growth - Deploying existing capabilities innew product markets

    Risk Reduction - the returns of projects/assetsmust be independent of each other,i.e. thedifferent corporate businesses must not be linkedthrough the corporate value chain

    Profitability only achieved if diversificationleads to value creation

    5

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    6/31

    When Business Diversification Becomes

    a Consideration

    It is faced with diminishing growth prospectsinpresent business

    When an expansion opportunity exists in an industrywhose technologies and products complement itspresent business

    It can leverage existing competencies andcapabilitiesby expanding into an industry thatrequires similar resource strengths

    It can reduce costsby diversifying into closely related

    businesses It has a powerful brand nameit can transfer to

    products of other businesses

    6

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    7/31

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    8/31

    Corporate Configuration

    De Wit & Meyer (2004:Ch.6)

    8

    What should be theprofile of the corporation?

    Corporate CompositionCorporate ManagementWhat organizational system is

    needed?

    In whatbusinesses

    shouldthe corporation

    be active?

    What shouldbe the relative

    weightof each business?

    Howshouldsynergiesbetween

    businessesbe realized?

    Whoshouldensure

    that synergiesare realized?

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    9/31

    Corporate Control StylesGoold & Campbell (1987) in De Wit & Meyer (2004:301),

    Grant (2010:434-440)

    9

    Depending on the mix of control & cooperation :

    Financial control (based on financial objectives - output)

    o highly autonomous SBUs, few activities centralized orstandardized except for the financial reporting system

    Strategic control (based on strategic objectives - input)

    o the SBUs are closely related to the corporate center, somesystems & activities centralized & standardized, the HQexplicitly coordinates activities across SBUs

    Strategic planning (input control)

    o direct supervision by the HQ, SBUs have little autonomy;many key activities are standardized & centralized

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    10/31

    The Multidivisional Structure (M-Form)

    Grant (2010:424-430)

    10

    Multibusiness firms are typically organized into strategic

    business units (SBU)

    The M-form:

    o business decisions are located at the SBU levelo the corporate centre exercises overall coordination & control

    Efficiency advantages of the M-form:

    o Adaptation to bounded rationality through dispersed decision

    makingo Allocation of decisions according to their frequency: high

    frequency (operating) decisions are made at the SBU level

    o Minimization of coordination costs: decisions concerning aparticular business area do not have to pass up to the top

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    11/31

    Corporate Strategy Options: Related vs.

    Unrelated Diversification

    Related diversificationattempts to increaseshareholder value by capturing cross-businessstrategic fitsalong value chain segments

    Unrelated diversificationattempts to build

    shareholder value by doing a superior job ofchoosing businesses to diversifyintoand managing the wholecollection of businesses

    11

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    12/31

    Related Diversification and Competitive

    Advantage

    Strategic fitexists when one or moreactivities included in the value chains of of adiversified companys businesses presentopportunities to

    Transferexpertise/capabilities/technology

    from one business to another

    Reduce costs by combiningrelatedactivities of different businesses intoa single operation

    Transferuse of firms brand namefrom onebusiness to another

    12

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    13/31

    What Is Unrelated Diversification?

    Involves diversifyinginto businesses with Nostrategic fit

    Nomeaningful value chain relationships

    Nounifying strategic theme Basic approach Diversifyinto any industry

    where potential existsto realize good financialresults

    While industry attractiveness and cost-of-entrytests are important, better-off test is secondary

    13

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    14/31

    Combination Related-Unrelated

    Diversification Strategies

    Dominant-business firms One major core business accounting for 50 -

    80 percent of revenues, with several smallrelated or unrelated businesses accounting forremainder

    Narrowly diversified firms Diversification includes afew (2 - 5) related or

    unrelated businesses

    Broadly diversified firms

    Diversification includes a wide collection ofeither related or unrelated businesses or amixture

    14

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    15/31

    Four Main Tasks in Crafting Corporate

    Strategy

    Picking new industriesto enteranddecidingonmeans of entry

    Pursuing opportunities to leverage cross-business value chain relationshipsinto

    competitive advantage Steering resourcesinto most attractive business

    units

    Initiating actionsto boost the combinedperformanceof businesses

    15

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    16/31

    BCG assists multidivisional firms in formulatingtheir

    strategies

    Autonomous divisions = business portfolio. Eg, AdidasAG comprised, Adidas, Reebok & Taylormade competingin footware, sports apparel; sports related goods.

    Divisions may compete in different industries: Eg, Hewlett

    Packard comprisedtechnology solutions services;commercial & consumer PCs; printing hardware & supplies,andfinancial services

    BCG focuses on market-share position & industry growth

    ratehelps CEOs make stay or go decisions

    Boston Consulting Group Matrix

    matching stage: BCG

    (Corporate level strategy)

    Ch 6 -16

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    17/31

    Stars Question marks

    Cash Cows Dogs

    Relative competitive position (market share)

    MarketGrowthrate

    The Boston Consulting Group(BCG) Matrix (Adapted from Johnson et al 2008)

    High

    Med

    Low

    High Med Low

    See David 2010:217 for elaboration17

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    18/31

    BCG Matrix

    Question Marks

    Low relative market share, competes in high-growthindustry

    Cash needs are high

    Cash generation is low

    STRATEGY: Decision to strengthen (intensive strategies:market penetration / market development / productdevelopment) or divest

    20Ch 6 -18

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    19/31

    BCG Matrix

    Stars

    High relative market share and high growth rate

    Best long-run opportunities for growth & profitability

    STRATEGY: Substantial investment to maintain orstrengthen dominant position;

    Backward or forward Integration, market penetration,market development, product development, joint ventures

    21Ch 6 -19

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    20/31

    BCG Matrix

    Cash Cows

    High relative market share, competes in low-growth industry

    Generates cash in excess of their needs

    Milked for other purposes

    STRATEGY: Maintain strong position as long as possibleProduct development, closely related diversification

    If weakens retrenchment or divestiture

    22Ch 6 -20

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    21/31

    BCG Matrix

    Dogs

    Low relative market share, competes in slow or nomarket growth industry

    Weak internal & external position

    STRATEGY:Liquidation, divestiture, retrenchment

    Note. Many businesses fall right in the middle of the BCGmatrix and thus are not easily classified

    23Ch 6 -21

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    22/31

    How to Evaluate a

    Diversified Companys Strategy

    Corporate-Level Decision Making

    Step 1: Assess the long-term attractiveness of each industry thecompany has diversified into

    Step 2:Assess competitive strength of each of the companysbusiness units

    Step 3: Check potential for cross-business strategic fits amongbusiness units

    Step 4: Check whether the firms resources fit the requirements of its

    business unitsStep 5: Rank performance and determine priority for resource

    allocation

    Step 6: Craft new strategic moves to improve overall companyperformance

    22

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    23/31

    Strategy Implications of 9 Cell

    Attractiveness/Strength Matrix

    Businesses in upper left corner

    Receive top investment priority

    Strategic prescriptiongrow and build

    Businesses in three diagonal cells

    Given medium investment priority

    Some businesses in this category may have brighteror dimmer prospects than others

    Businesses in lower right corner

    Candidates for divestitureor managed to take cashout of the business

    23

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    24/31

    Nine Cell Industry Attractiveness Matrix

    24

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    25/31

    Evaluating Resource Fit and Sufficiency

    Good resource fitexists when

    A companys businesses, individually, add to itscollective resource strengths, either

    financially or strategically

    Firm has resources to adequately support itsbusinesses without spreading itself too thin

    25

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    26/31

    Determining Financial Resource Fit

    Determine cash flowand investmentrequirementsof business units

    Which are cash hogsand which are cash cows?

    Aside from cash flow,financial resource fit alsoincludes

    Assessing the individual contributionstocompanywide performance targets by each businessunit

    Determining if the company has the financial

    strength to provide proper fundingto its businessunit and maintain a healthy credit rating

    26

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    27/31

    Examining a Companys Nonfinancial

    Resource Fits

    Diversified companies must ensure a good fitbetween its collection of resources and theKSFsof each industry it has diversified into

    Does the company have or can it develop specific

    resources and capabilities needed to be successfulin each of its businesses?

    Do recent acquisitions strengthenthe collection ofresources or cause them to be stretched too

    thinly?

    27

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    28/31

    28

    ki i i f

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    29/31

    Ranking Business Units for Resource

    Allocation

    Factors to consider injudging SBU (strategicbusiness-unit) performance

    Sales growth

    Profit growth

    Contribution to company earnings

    Cash flow generation

    Return on capital employed in business

    29

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    30/31

    Crafting New Strategic Moves

    Stick closelywith existing business lineupand pursue opportunities it presents

    Broadencompanys business scopebymaking new acquisitions in new industries

    Divestcertain businesses and retrench

    to a narrower base of business operations

    Restructurecompanys business lineup, putting a

    whole new face on business makeup

    30

    Business Responsiveness:

  • 7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review

    31/31

    Business Responsiveness:

    Major Problems for Multi-business Firms

    31

    High governance costs

    Slower decision-making

    Dulled incentives

    Dysfunctional control

    Strategy incongruence

    Coordinating activities

    More layers of management

    Misfit with business demand

    Corporate center misses specificbusiness know-how

    Lack of autonomy has anegative impact on motivation