Upload
wordssmith
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
1/31
9Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations
Strategic Review, Evaluation, and Restructuring
1
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
2/31
Levels of Strategy: important distinctions
Network
Corporate
Business
Functional
Ansoff
Boston
MatrixAlliances
Mergers andAcquisitions
2
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
3/31
Four Different Organisational Approaches to
Change / Growth Miles and Snow (1978)
Prospectors Risk-takers, opportunity-seekers
Almost continually search for market opportunities
Defenders Keep existing products, protect market share
Work with narrow product-market domains
Analyzers Build on strengths, look for add-on options
Often operate in two types of product-market domains, one
relatively stable, the other changing Reactors
Respond, dont look for change
Top mangers frequently perceive change and uncertainty occurringin their organizational environments but are unable to respondeffectively
3
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
4/31
Ansoff Matrixchoosing strategies
4
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
5/31
Motives for Diversification
5
Growth - Deploying existing capabilities innew product markets
Risk Reduction - the returns of projects/assetsmust be independent of each other,i.e. thedifferent corporate businesses must not be linkedthrough the corporate value chain
Profitability only achieved if diversificationleads to value creation
5
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
6/31
When Business Diversification Becomes
a Consideration
It is faced with diminishing growth prospectsinpresent business
When an expansion opportunity exists in an industrywhose technologies and products complement itspresent business
It can leverage existing competencies andcapabilitiesby expanding into an industry thatrequires similar resource strengths
It can reduce costsby diversifying into closely related
businesses It has a powerful brand nameit can transfer to
products of other businesses
6
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
7/31
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
8/31
Corporate Configuration
De Wit & Meyer (2004:Ch.6)
8
What should be theprofile of the corporation?
Corporate CompositionCorporate ManagementWhat organizational system is
needed?
In whatbusinesses
shouldthe corporation
be active?
What shouldbe the relative
weightof each business?
Howshouldsynergiesbetween
businessesbe realized?
Whoshouldensure
that synergiesare realized?
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
9/31
Corporate Control StylesGoold & Campbell (1987) in De Wit & Meyer (2004:301),
Grant (2010:434-440)
9
Depending on the mix of control & cooperation :
Financial control (based on financial objectives - output)
o highly autonomous SBUs, few activities centralized orstandardized except for the financial reporting system
Strategic control (based on strategic objectives - input)
o the SBUs are closely related to the corporate center, somesystems & activities centralized & standardized, the HQexplicitly coordinates activities across SBUs
Strategic planning (input control)
o direct supervision by the HQ, SBUs have little autonomy;many key activities are standardized & centralized
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
10/31
The Multidivisional Structure (M-Form)
Grant (2010:424-430)
10
Multibusiness firms are typically organized into strategic
business units (SBU)
The M-form:
o business decisions are located at the SBU levelo the corporate centre exercises overall coordination & control
Efficiency advantages of the M-form:
o Adaptation to bounded rationality through dispersed decision
makingo Allocation of decisions according to their frequency: high
frequency (operating) decisions are made at the SBU level
o Minimization of coordination costs: decisions concerning aparticular business area do not have to pass up to the top
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
11/31
Corporate Strategy Options: Related vs.
Unrelated Diversification
Related diversificationattempts to increaseshareholder value by capturing cross-businessstrategic fitsalong value chain segments
Unrelated diversificationattempts to build
shareholder value by doing a superior job ofchoosing businesses to diversifyintoand managing the wholecollection of businesses
11
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
12/31
Related Diversification and Competitive
Advantage
Strategic fitexists when one or moreactivities included in the value chains of of adiversified companys businesses presentopportunities to
Transferexpertise/capabilities/technology
from one business to another
Reduce costs by combiningrelatedactivities of different businesses intoa single operation
Transferuse of firms brand namefrom onebusiness to another
12
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
13/31
What Is Unrelated Diversification?
Involves diversifyinginto businesses with Nostrategic fit
Nomeaningful value chain relationships
Nounifying strategic theme Basic approach Diversifyinto any industry
where potential existsto realize good financialresults
While industry attractiveness and cost-of-entrytests are important, better-off test is secondary
13
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
14/31
Combination Related-Unrelated
Diversification Strategies
Dominant-business firms One major core business accounting for 50 -
80 percent of revenues, with several smallrelated or unrelated businesses accounting forremainder
Narrowly diversified firms Diversification includes afew (2 - 5) related or
unrelated businesses
Broadly diversified firms
Diversification includes a wide collection ofeither related or unrelated businesses or amixture
14
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
15/31
Four Main Tasks in Crafting Corporate
Strategy
Picking new industriesto enteranddecidingonmeans of entry
Pursuing opportunities to leverage cross-business value chain relationshipsinto
competitive advantage Steering resourcesinto most attractive business
units
Initiating actionsto boost the combinedperformanceof businesses
15
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
16/31
BCG assists multidivisional firms in formulatingtheir
strategies
Autonomous divisions = business portfolio. Eg, AdidasAG comprised, Adidas, Reebok & Taylormade competingin footware, sports apparel; sports related goods.
Divisions may compete in different industries: Eg, Hewlett
Packard comprisedtechnology solutions services;commercial & consumer PCs; printing hardware & supplies,andfinancial services
BCG focuses on market-share position & industry growth
ratehelps CEOs make stay or go decisions
Boston Consulting Group Matrix
matching stage: BCG
(Corporate level strategy)
Ch 6 -16
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
17/31
Stars Question marks
Cash Cows Dogs
Relative competitive position (market share)
MarketGrowthrate
The Boston Consulting Group(BCG) Matrix (Adapted from Johnson et al 2008)
High
Med
Low
High Med Low
See David 2010:217 for elaboration17
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
18/31
BCG Matrix
Question Marks
Low relative market share, competes in high-growthindustry
Cash needs are high
Cash generation is low
STRATEGY: Decision to strengthen (intensive strategies:market penetration / market development / productdevelopment) or divest
20Ch 6 -18
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
19/31
BCG Matrix
Stars
High relative market share and high growth rate
Best long-run opportunities for growth & profitability
STRATEGY: Substantial investment to maintain orstrengthen dominant position;
Backward or forward Integration, market penetration,market development, product development, joint ventures
21Ch 6 -19
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
20/31
BCG Matrix
Cash Cows
High relative market share, competes in low-growth industry
Generates cash in excess of their needs
Milked for other purposes
STRATEGY: Maintain strong position as long as possibleProduct development, closely related diversification
If weakens retrenchment or divestiture
22Ch 6 -20
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
21/31
BCG Matrix
Dogs
Low relative market share, competes in slow or nomarket growth industry
Weak internal & external position
STRATEGY:Liquidation, divestiture, retrenchment
Note. Many businesses fall right in the middle of the BCGmatrix and thus are not easily classified
23Ch 6 -21
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
22/31
How to Evaluate a
Diversified Companys Strategy
Corporate-Level Decision Making
Step 1: Assess the long-term attractiveness of each industry thecompany has diversified into
Step 2:Assess competitive strength of each of the companysbusiness units
Step 3: Check potential for cross-business strategic fits amongbusiness units
Step 4: Check whether the firms resources fit the requirements of its
business unitsStep 5: Rank performance and determine priority for resource
allocation
Step 6: Craft new strategic moves to improve overall companyperformance
22
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
23/31
Strategy Implications of 9 Cell
Attractiveness/Strength Matrix
Businesses in upper left corner
Receive top investment priority
Strategic prescriptiongrow and build
Businesses in three diagonal cells
Given medium investment priority
Some businesses in this category may have brighteror dimmer prospects than others
Businesses in lower right corner
Candidates for divestitureor managed to take cashout of the business
23
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
24/31
Nine Cell Industry Attractiveness Matrix
24
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
25/31
Evaluating Resource Fit and Sufficiency
Good resource fitexists when
A companys businesses, individually, add to itscollective resource strengths, either
financially or strategically
Firm has resources to adequately support itsbusinesses without spreading itself too thin
25
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
26/31
Determining Financial Resource Fit
Determine cash flowand investmentrequirementsof business units
Which are cash hogsand which are cash cows?
Aside from cash flow,financial resource fit alsoincludes
Assessing the individual contributionstocompanywide performance targets by each businessunit
Determining if the company has the financial
strength to provide proper fundingto its businessunit and maintain a healthy credit rating
26
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
27/31
Examining a Companys Nonfinancial
Resource Fits
Diversified companies must ensure a good fitbetween its collection of resources and theKSFsof each industry it has diversified into
Does the company have or can it develop specific
resources and capabilities needed to be successfulin each of its businesses?
Do recent acquisitions strengthenthe collection ofresources or cause them to be stretched too
thinly?
27
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
28/31
28
ki i i f
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
29/31
Ranking Business Units for Resource
Allocation
Factors to consider injudging SBU (strategicbusiness-unit) performance
Sales growth
Profit growth
Contribution to company earnings
Cash flow generation
Return on capital employed in business
29
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
30/31
Crafting New Strategic Moves
Stick closelywith existing business lineupand pursue opportunities it presents
Broadencompanys business scopebymaking new acquisitions in new industries
Divestcertain businesses and retrench
to a narrower base of business operations
Restructurecompanys business lineup, putting a
whole new face on business makeup
30
Business Responsiveness:
7/31/2019 Strategies for Multi-Business Corporations Strategic Review
31/31
Business Responsiveness:
Major Problems for Multi-business Firms
31
High governance costs
Slower decision-making
Dulled incentives
Dysfunctional control
Strategy incongruence
Coordinating activities
More layers of management
Misfit with business demand
Corporate center misses specificbusiness know-how
Lack of autonomy has anegative impact on motivation