Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 1
Strategy Optimization for Credit
Maximise profit while managing
risk
New Business PricingNew Business Pricing
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 2
The credit decisioning dilemma
How to determine the right action based on the multiple dimensions of customer value within operational and financial constraints?
Customers Decision
Action “A”
Action “B”
Action “C”
Action “D”
Action “E”
Action “F”
Profit
RiskRisk
Take UpTake Up
XX--SellSell
FeesFees
Early Early
SettleSettle
Results
A function of the customer profile, and the action taken.
Typical constraints
•Best offer
•Best Advice
•Competition
•Credit Losses
•Rates allocated
•Business volume
•ROI hurdles
•Resource capacity
•Targets
•Budgets
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 3
Agenda
�The solution
�Loan pricing business problem
�Development methodology
�Some results
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 4
Making a decision on each customer
�Calculate the profit made for each customer based on historical
decisions
� Infer the financial effect on each customer as if we had we taken different decisions
�Select the strategy action which would have maximised the
profit for each customer
Right?
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 5
Making a decision on each customer
�Maximising profit for each customer won’t necessarily meet the
business needs
• Bad debt levels could increase beyond agreed budgets
• The volume of business written may fall – impacting the credibility of the brand in the market
• Referral volumes could exceed manageable levels
Not quite….
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 6
How to resolve the issues
�We need to create a decision process which enables the
business to maximise profit but ……..subject to constrained
portfolio rates of Bad debt, volumes, exposure etc.
Resolution
�It is an optimization problem
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 7
Optimization defined
Mathematical decisioning process to maximise a business objective or goal (such as profit) subject to constrained resources
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 8
£90 £100 £120
£4 £6 £8
£70 £90 £60
£3 £6 £8
£20 £200 £300
£3 £12 £15
Profit
Bad Debt
Profit
Bad Debt
Profit
Bad Debt
Loan APR
Customer 1
Customer 2
Customer 3
10% 12%8%
Simplified new business optimization example
Option/ 1 2 3
1
2
3
Profit
Bad Debt
Customer
10% 10% 8%
- 8% 8%
12% 10% 10%
£400 £370 £360
£21 £21 £19
Option 1: Max bad debt = £21
Option 2: Max bad debt = £21, and same accept rate
Option 3: Max bad debt = £21, and same accept rate, and lower bad debt
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 9
Agenda
�The solution
�Loan pricing business problem
�Development methodology
�Some results
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 10
New Business : Loan Pricing
• Typical results: up to 20% increase in profit contribution for the same lending amount and bad debt value
• Optimised Decision Engine used to determine the optimal price to offer to new customers
• Optimal decision based on: Deal profitability
• incorporates propensity to take up the offer and credit risk losses
• Optimization applied dynamically at the individual customer level
• Improve personal loan customer profitability
• Consider many alternative interest rates
Challenge
Solution
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 11
Risk Based Pricing – building models for profit
�The organisation has operated risk based pricing for a period of
time
�There are are variety of rates assigned to different customer groups
� Interest rates have varied over time
�Competition has offered different rates influencing the market
place and customer behaviour
Scenario
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 12
What factors influence the decision?
� Increasing price improves margins but
• Reduces take up volumes
• Increases bad debt rates
�Potential impact on market
share
� Legislation – only 1/3 of
customers may be priced
Business Issues Financial Factors
�Credit Risk
�Propensity to take up loan
�Existing margin on loan
�Term and value of loan
�Early settlement
�Existing relationship value
Risk is a key component of the decision – but not the only dimension
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 13
How does optimization help in pricing?
�Enables organisations to manage multiple constraints and consider many alternative strategy actions
�Allows organisations to apply quantitative methods to the art of pricing decisioning, maximising returns
Optimization
Volume
constraints
Bad debt
Constraint
Product
targets
Pricing
constraints
Etc.
Constraints
Right Offer
Customer-level recommendation
Customer
Profile
Business
Objective
Max profitetc
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 14
How does optimization help in pricing?
Variable Terms setting
Test and Control
Accept Decline
decisions using risk score
Decision complexity
Inc
rem
en
tal
be
ne
fit
Strategy management
Champion Challenger
+5 to +20%
+5% to +20%
Offer Modelling
Optimized
Selections
+15 to +30% or more
Constrained, mathematical optimization significantly
outperforms current best practice approaches by
evaluating the entire set of actions / offers
simultaneously rather than one at a time
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 15
Agenda
�The solution
�Loan pricing business problem
�Development methodology
�Some results
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 16
Development Methodology
Predictive analytics rank
customers based on risk,
propensity to take up the
loan
Analytics
Models are combined
using optimization to
recommend customer
decisions which maximise
profit within constraints
Optimization
Decisions are executed
within an application
processing system
Deployment
Decisions are evaluated
and fed back and
evaluated
Evaluation
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 17
Analytical steps
Decision
Definition
Decision
Modelling &
Evaluation
Decision
Formulation
Decision
Simulation
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 18
Analytical steps
Identify the key components of the utility function (e.g. profit)
Identify the range of potential behavioural states (e.g bad)
Decision
Definition
Decision
Modelling &
Evaluation
Decision
Formulation
Decision
Simulation
Identify Key Outcome States
Utility Function Definition
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 19
Utility Function Definition
Assume that max profit is the business objective and that profit will vary with any given strategy. The requirement is to forecast profit for various strategy actions for each customer. First Step is to define ‘What is Profit’
Other costs (which do not vary by loan rate) can be
included in the utility function to reflect overall
business profitability
Other costs (which do not vary by loan rate) can be
included in the utility function to reflect overall
business profitability
An example Profit definition for Loan
portfolio:
+ Insurance income
+ Principal interest
– Cost of funds
– Cost of Capital
– Expected loss
– set-up costs
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 20
Identify Key Outcome States
Outcome states identify groups of customers which have behaved in a specific way - gone to default, closed, early settle (say for a loan). The likelihood of customers entering this state can be modelled from the observation data available at the decision making point.
Outcome states are the key drivers affecting the profit components calculations (and
therefore the profit models)
Loss
Default
Revenue
Close
Revenue is accounted for only if the applicant accept the loan offer
Revenue is accounted for only if the applicant accept the loan offer
Observation point dataThe take up outcome
state is modelled using observation point data
The take up outcome state is modelled using observation point data
Take UpEarly Settle
Revenue Revenue
Default outcome state is modelled using
observation point data
Default outcome state is modelled using
observation point data
The loss value is modelled for any
customers likely to default
The loss value is modelled for any
customers likely to default
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 21
Analytical steps
Identify the key components of the utility function (e.g. profit)
Comparative analysis of the predictive models against observed behaviour
Define the modelling data set and grouping customers with similar behaviours
Identify the range of potential behavioural states (e.g bad)
Predict each profit component/potential outcome state and each potential action based on historical decisions
Decision
Definition
Decision
Modelling &
Evaluation
Decision
Formulation
Decision
Simulation
Identify Key Outcome States
Utility Function Definition
Observation Segment Definition
Profit Component Modelling
Model Validation and
results
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 22
Modelling Profit Components
� In order to develop models, the organisation needs experience of different actions/ rates
� Ideally this experience is on similar customers
�Actions need to be designed carefully to provide a
range of different experiences of action.
�Client involvement is critical
Experience is essential
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 23
Making a decision on each customer
Take up of loan varies by application score
- the higher the score the lower the probability of take up
����������������� �����������
���
���
���
���
���
���
��� ��� ���
�� �� ��� ���������
���� ��� ����� �� ��������
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 24
Factoring in the effect of pricing
Increasing rates reduce the take up rate - often the effect is not linear
����������� ��������������
���
���
���
���
���
���
��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ����
�� �������
�� ! �
�� ! "
�� ! #
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 25
Risk Scores will need adjusting…
•One of the most predictive pieces of information about a customer’s
risk is whether the customer is prepared to take up the loan.
•The doubling of default (bad) rates at a given score for customers who
are risk priced is not unusual
������������������������������
�
"
�
�
�
��
�"
��
� � " # � � �
���������������
������������
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 26
Analytical steps
Identify the key components of the utility function (e.g. profit)
Comparative analysis of the predictive models against observed behaviour
Combine the predictive models into the function to be maximised
Define the modelling data set and grouping customers with similar behaviours
Identify the range of potential behavioural states (e.g bad)
Predict each profit component/potential outcome state and each potential action based on historical decisions
Simulate how the components of the utility function vary by different potential actions
Decision
Definition
Decision
Modelling &
Evaluation
Decision
Formulation
Decision
Simulation
Identify Key Outcome States
Utility Function Definition
Observation Segment Definition
Profit Component Modelling
Simulation
Model Validation and
results
Formulation
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 27
Typical inputs
Strategic imperatives
Risk Scores
Insurance Take up
Early settlement
Loan Profit
Referral costs
Initial Rate
Channel
Constraints
Example optimization process
Results feedback loop continuously
improves the process
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Scenario n
Assess different
scenarios &
choose the best one
to deploy
Deploy
chosen
scenario
Optimization
Create scenarios
that maximise
objective(s) subject
to constraints
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 28
Marketswitch Optimization Software
Configurable
Business &
Operational
Constraints
�
Configurable Predictive
Economics
�
‘What-if’
Scenario Optimizations
� Configurable Business
Goals
�
Offer & Channel
Hierarchies
�
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 29
Strategy Optimization Implementation
• Application scorecard applied and based on score (and other rules) policy decline rules applied
• Some customers may not be eligible for Pricing
• Champion Challenger Test – based on rule base or Optimization
• Multiple Models are applied and profit components derived for each price option
• Ability to apply different Optimized scenarios based on different constraint setting
• Consolidation of decision
Strategy Management
system defines the parameters for each customer which define propensities and other profit components
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 30
Agenda
�The solution
�Loan pricing business problem
�Development methodology
�Some results
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 31
Results: Trade off Between Profit and Volume
Historical
Maintain Take Up% Price Constrained
Unconstrained ��������!��������
$�� %� �� ��!
������
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 32
�������"��#�$�����
#�$�����
������
Trade Off Between Profit and Bad Debt
Current Accept
Unconstrained
Bad Debt Constrained
Maximum Volume
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 33
Results: Profit Improvement
Previous Accepts –few accounts declined historically
Profit Opportunity 12% -15%
Where unconstrained, most customers are priced
Scenario
% Change
in
Accepts
% Change in
Profit
%
Change
in Take
Up
% Not
Priced (all)
Historical Strategy 100000 90
Non constrained -2% 15% -10% 14
% Priced Constrained -2.5% 12% -15% 54
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 34
Retail BankLoan pricing
13% profit improvement
Diversified ServicesCustomer cross sell campaigns
25% profit improvement
International Wireless Provider�500,000 per day improvementin retained revenues
Finance CompanyInitial collections actions
18% reduction in losses
Card IssuerCredit line increases
£7 incremental profit per account per annum
Card IssuerCustomer acquisition campaigns
20% improvement in customer lifetime value
Enterprise-wide customer optimization
© 2005, Experian-Scorex Proprietary and Confidential Release v1.0 // September 2005 // Page 35
Strategy Optimization for Credit
Maximise profit while managing
risk
New Business PricingNew Business Pricing