Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Headquarters U.S. Air Force
Streamlining Air Force NEPA: Streamlining Air Force NEPA: Leaning the Environmental Impact Leaning the Environmental Impact
Analysis Process (EIAP)Analysis Process (EIAP)
Ms. Michele Indermark
Deputy for Environmental Planning
SAF/IEENEPA Man Blues
2I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Leaning the EIA Process
The problem:
− Air Force Environmental Impact Analysis Process takes too long and costs too much
The solution:
− “Lean” the EIAP by identifying, reducing and eliminating inefficiencies
3I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Leaning the EIA Process
The goal of the Leaning session:
Reduce time and cost of EIA Process
4I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Leaning the EIA Process
The Leaning process:
− Identify SIPOC (Supplier/ Inputs/ Process/ Outputs/ Customer)
− Identify value stream and existing inefficiencies
− Identify countermeasures
− Develop implementation plan
5I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Leaning the EIA Process
Leaning Step 1: Group brainstorms. Breakout groups map the current, or “as-is” EIA Process
6I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
EIAP “As-is” Step 1
7I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
EIAP “As-is” Step 2
8I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
EIAP “As-is” Step 3
9I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
EIAP “As-is” Step 4
10I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Leaning the EIA Process
Leaning Step 2:
− Through breakout groups and discussion, identify value streams and delays/ inefficiencies
− Develop and refine the ideal, or “To be” EIA process
11I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
EIAP “To-be” Step 1
12I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
EIAP “To-be” Step 2
13I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Leaning the EIA Process
Leaning Step 3:
− Through brainstorm and small groups, develop solutions (countermeasures) to eliminate inefficiencies identified in step 2
14I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Leaning the EIA Process
Leaning Step 4:
− Create implementation plan to identify the who, what, how and when
− Include “checkpoints” to ensure implementation
Countermeasure Who What How When Checkpoints
Develop Tools
-813 Generator (ASET tool)
-Air Staff -MAJCOM/ Base App test
-Enterprise application (e.g., ASET) gap analysis
-Policy memo/ directive
-Enterprise application for EA EIS test
-Provide names (POCs):
1 OCT 06
-Perfect State 30 APR 07
-Tasker tracking system
-Develop ROD template -Air staff AFSOC -Template integrated App -Modify and distribute existing template -Short Term - 6 AUG 06
-Perfect State - 30 SEPT 07
3-6 Mos.
-Tasker tracking system
-Contract status tracker AFCEE Web-based tracking tool -Move tracker data to portal
-Build website to track and manage all EA/EIS data
-Short Term - ?
-Perfect State - ?
-AFCEE can complete?
-Tasker tracking system
NEPA status tracker Air staff -Access D.B. Web integrated tool -Place info on C.O.P.
-Capability manager with overall process tracking EA/EIS data on GCSS along with contract data
-Short Term - 15 DEC 06
-Perfect State - 12-18 months
-Tasker tracking system
Eliminate Tasks
-Eliminate DoD security and Policy review
-Air staff -Eliminate DoD Coordination of security policy & review
-Coord. Elimination of task with DoD -Short Term - AF Coord 6 Mos.
-Perfect State - DoD Coord. 18 Mos.
-Tasker tracking system
-Eliminate SOW and use SOO -Central Management Office (CMO)
-Develop a standard for Statement of Objectives (SOO)
-Work with AFCEE and MAJCOMs to determine Standard
-Perfect State - 6-9 Mos. -Tasker tracking system
Improve Quality of Documents
-Produce more concise documents
-Central Management Office (CMO)
-Standard templates for all EA & EIS completion
-Create & distribute to POCs for use
-Use within CMO for all EISs
-Short Term - continue to follow current CEQ regsmore closely
-Perfect State - Integrate ASET tool capabilities across AF (for all docs)
-Tasker tracking system
Training
-NEPA training handbook
Air staff -Standard training documents/ capability
-813 process
-ROD drafter
-EIS drafter
-Create CD and distribute
-Place CBT on Web
-Integrate training function into enterprise application
-Short Term - put training doc on CD and distribute and place on Web
-Perfect State - Integrate into automated tool with CBT style help and search capability
-Tasker tracking system
Establish EIS Office of Expertise
-Generate in-house draft EISs w/ automated enterprise tool
-EIAP expertise office -Overall integrated/automated capability (use ASET functions)
-Automated enterprise tool expanded on existing tech.
2-3 years -AFI interim CHGE letter, follow up via AF EIAP reg
-Brief RODs for Signature -Proponent
-MAJCOM
-HQ oversight office
-Brief RODs instead of using SSS process -MAJCOM & HQ prep: brief ROD, sign at brief Now -AFI interim CHGE letter, follow up via AF EIAP reg
-One concurrent review for all docs -HQ & MAJCOM interdisciplinary team
-Concurrent review vs sequential review
-Reviewer puts #1 priority on EIS reviews
-MAJCOM distribute to Inter-disciplinary team simultaneously; MAJCOM consolidates
Now -AFI interim CHGE letter, follow up via AF EIAP reg
-Open communication lines between orgs: understand
responsibilities
-Interact sooner
-A5/A3/A7/A8/GC / etc. -Proponent take responsibility sooner (even if classified). Much sooner to start planning (integrate)
-Training
-Memo
-Teaming (follow reg)
3-6 Mos. -Letter from CSAF
-Validate EIS $
-Centrally fund Via AFCEE
-EIAP expertise office
-AFCEE support
-Validate POM program & centrally manage/execute
-Need program design
-Mirror proposed MILCON
1 Year
-Pre-select contract service center/agent
-Pre-negotiated contract
-EIAP expertise office
-AFCEE support
-Pre-negotiated CLINS, pre-selected -Need program design 2 Years -Policy memo
16I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Air Force EIAP Rapid Improvement Event Outbrief4 August, 2006
Participants Goal/ Process
Time Saved/ Recommendations Future Rapid Improvement Event (RIE)
Problem: The EIAP process costs too much and takes too long
SAF/GCN AFSOC/A7CV Booz Allen Hamilton
AFLOA/JACE TSD
AFCEE/CCR-S SAF/IEE
AFCEE/TDN AF/A7CPB
ACC/A7ZP AFCEE
SAF/AQRE AFSOC/JA
AFSOC/A7CZ AFSOC/AFSO21
AFSOC/A7CO SAIC
• Reduce time to complete NEPA process
• Form team training
• Supplier/Inputs/Process/Outputs/Customer (SIPOC)
• Value stream
• Cause analysis
• Countermeasures
• Implementation plan
• Involvement too late
• New financial management system (being looked at HQ USAF level)
• All data available all the time (natural & built infrastructure)
• Contact all potential service agents for SOW template and automate
• Acquisition and airspace issues
• Natural & cultural resources consultations (INRMP, CRMP, mitigation)
• Integrate AF planning functions (mission, installation, environmental, legal, finance) (best for corporate AF)
Wait Time # of People Touch Time Serial Time
Current State 7 Man-Months 324 6.5 Man-Years 22 Months
Future State 3.5 Man-Months
168 6.3 Man-Years 16 Months
• Establish EIS Office of Expertise
• Eliminate Tasks
• Develop Tools
• Training Program
• Improve Quality of Documents