Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Tous droits réservés © Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1978 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit(including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can beviewed online.https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/
This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit.Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal,Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is topromote and disseminate research.https://www.erudit.org/en/
Document generated on 05/10/2020 9:26 p.m.
Sociologie et sociétés
Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominéesQuelques réflexions à propos des thèses d’Alain TouraineSocial Structure and Change in Dominated SocietiesSome Reflections on Alain Touraine's ThesesRobert VANDYCKE
Changement social et rapports de classesVolume 10, Number 2, octobre 1978
URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/001820arDOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/001820ar
See table of contents
Publisher(s)Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal
ISSN0038-030X (print)1492-1375 (digital)
Explore this journal
Cite this articleVANDYCKE, R. (1978). Structure et changement social dans les sociétésdominées : quelques réflexions à propos des thèses d’Alain Touraine. Sociologieet sociétés, 10 (2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.7202/001820ar
Article abstractFor Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore,it can not produce the passage from one type of society to another. At the verymost it can produce only the conditions for such a transformation. However,according to Touraine, only by recognizing the primacy of structural analysiscan one avoid the deterioration of the study of social change into philosophy ofhistory. The relationship of concepts dependent on synchronie and diachronicanalyses is therefore central to his analysis. In this critical essay, an effort ismade to determine the way in which Touraine succeeds in bringing these twoorders of concepts together in his analyses of colonial domination and ofdependency.