12
Tous droits réservés © Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1978 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Document generated on 05/10/2020 9:26 p.m. Sociologie et sociétés Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées Quelques réflexions à propos des thèses d’Alain Touraine Social Structure and Change in Dominated Societies Some Reflections on Alain Touraine's Theses Robert VANDYCKE Changement social et rapports de classes Volume 10, Number 2, octobre 1978 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/001820ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/001820ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal ISSN 0038-030X (print) 1492-1375 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article VANDYCKE, R. (1978). Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées : quelques réflexions à propos des thèses d’Alain Touraine. Sociologie et sociétés, 10 (2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.7202/001820ar Article abstract For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage from one type of society to another. At the very most it can produce only the conditions for such a transformation. However, according to Touraine, only by recognizing the primacy of structural analysis can one avoid the deterioration of the study of social change into philosophy of history. The relationship of concepts dependent on synchronie and diachronic analyses is therefore central to his analysis. In this critical essay, an effort is made to determine the way in which Touraine succeeds in bringing these two orders of concepts together in his analyses of colonial domination and of dependency.

Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage

Tous droits réservés © Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1978 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit(including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can beviewed online.https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/

This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit.Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal,Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is topromote and disseminate research.https://www.erudit.org/en/

Document generated on 05/10/2020 9:26 p.m.

Sociologie et sociétés

Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominéesQuelques réflexions à propos des thèses d’Alain TouraineSocial Structure and Change in Dominated SocietiesSome Reflections on Alain Touraine's ThesesRobert VANDYCKE

Changement social et rapports de classesVolume 10, Number 2, octobre 1978

URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/001820arDOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/001820ar

See table of contents

Publisher(s)Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal

ISSN0038-030X (print)1492-1375 (digital)

Explore this journal

Cite this articleVANDYCKE, R. (1978). Structure et changement social dans les sociétésdominées : quelques réflexions à propos des thèses d’Alain Touraine. Sociologieet sociétés, 10 (2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.7202/001820ar

Article abstractFor Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore,it can not produce the passage from one type of society to another. At the verymost it can produce only the conditions for such a transformation. However,according to Touraine, only by recognizing the primacy of structural analysiscan one avoid the deterioration of the study of social change into philosophy ofhistory. The relationship of concepts dependent on synchronie and diachronicanalyses is therefore central to his analysis. In this critical essay, an effort ismade to determine the way in which Touraine succeeds in bringing these twoorders of concepts together in his analyses of colonial domination and ofdependency.

Page 2: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage
Page 3: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage
Page 4: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage
Page 5: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage
Page 6: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage
Page 7: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage
Page 8: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage
Page 9: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage
Page 10: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage
Page 11: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage
Page 12: Structure et changement social dans les sociétés dominées ... · For Touraine, conflict engenders change within a field of historicity; therefore, it can not produce the passage