Upload
jordan-penner
View
222
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Student perceptions of online practical science
Dr Victoria NicholasDr David RobinsonProf. Stephen Swithenby
Outline• Context• Hypothesis• Research Methods• Findings• Future work
Context• Modules offered globally as part of a qualification must
have a practical science component• Anecdotal evidence suggests a negative perception of
online practical science
Context• Can we validate this anecdotal evidence?• Does experience of the module alter perception?• What lessons can we learn about our pedagogical
design?
The modules• Scientific investigations – 10 credits online only module• Investigative and mathematical skills in science – 30
credits – blended• Both globally available• 95.2% of enrolled students completed and 84.2% of
enrolled students passed
Investigative and mathematical skills in Science• Some printed books• Some online texts• OU Live (synchronous online tutorial)• Tutor-marked e-assessment• Computer-marked e-assessment• Tutor group forum
Scientific Investigations
Hypothesis• There will be a shift in student perception about online
practical science after study.
Research Methods• Email invitation sent to 100 students • 16 % response rate – all interviewed• Telephone discussion for 15 minutes pre and post study• Discussions recorded and transcribed
Analysis: Grounded theory analysis with stages:• Open coding• Axial coding• Selective coding
Question areas• Online study• Practical science• Practical science studied online
Responses
I’m not sure if I will feel like a real scientist
I would probably get more out of a face to face situation in a real laboratory
There is a lack of really nice
practical stuff, test tubes and a few chemicals
Responses
If I could choose, I would do residential schools instead
I wish we could have a hands-on laboratory session
Oh I really don’t want to do this but I have
to
Unexpected responses• Timings and coordination• Online discussions• Reliability of other students in collaborative work• Solitary nature of practical work
Post study responses
Criticisms of methodology• Self selecting group• Motivated by voucher• Honesty of response• Leading questions
Continuing research• Scientific Investigations post-study interviews late April• Investigative and mathematical skills in Science post-
study interviews late May• Broader questionnaire planned for next S141
presentation starting in October.
Quantitative approach• Aim to use the interview responses to inform
questionnaire design• Larger sample of students• Possibly higher response rate with questionnaire format
Broader perspective• The Open University has an ongoing strategy to remain
at the forefront of innovation in online distance learning.• Research should highlight student misconceptions about
practical online science and will inform the design of new modules.
Summary• Address hypothesis• Standard research methods• Diversity of responses• Key responses• Continuing research