UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES – FACULTY OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT 

       

  

Studies of Local Development Projects in 

Cabramatta Lessons for Renewing and Consolidating West 

Central Sydney       

THESIS PROJECT 2009 (PLAN 4132)   

SANG HUNG TAING (GAVEN) Z3160011   

23 OCTOBER 2009  

 

 

 

 

                   

Prepared by Sang Hung Taing (Gaven)

Bachelor of Planning degree, Faculty of the Built Environment

University of New South Wales

  

A SPECIAL NOTE FROM OUR SPONSORS...

This thesis is proudly brought to you by Lipton Tea, makers of the finest quality tea

that can keep any student going and going and going and going and going and

going….

ABSTRACT

Current circumstances relating to urban renewal and consolidation in the West

Central subregion of Sydney and in particular the suburb of Cabramatta can be

likened to a stalemate in a game of chess. As the New South Wales Government

plans to increase and renew housing in the form of higher density development, the

majority of the existing community living within these areas need, amongst other

things, better outcomes in terms of development improvements, design quality and

more affordable housing options.

From the perspective of developers, there are too many risks for too little returns,

starting from project inception to delivery. There is a very real prospect of large scale

displacement and greater housing stress, with significant social and political

repercussions. Urban renewal in the form of consolidation must be rethought and

remodeled through improved policy and specialised development initiatives.

The primary aim of this thesis is to examine and distil broad lessons from local

housing projects in Cabramatta to help form best practice property development

policy mechanisms. It is hoped that this will help better inform future policy and

actions as well as contribute to the existing academic body of work concerning urban

consolidation and renewal.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to sincerely thank the local developers who chose to give up their time to

participate in this research for which this project would was made possible.

Special thanks to Simon Pinnegar and the team of the City Futures Research Centre for

their support and guidance throughout the course of this project. Your knowledge and

enthusiasm has been invaluable to my experience as a planner.

And finally, I would like thank my family - Mum, Dad, A Ma and A Gong together with Biggy,

Yi Tsair and Re. Thank you for showing the support and love throughout my years of study. I

am truly grateful for the patience and special care you have shown me.

i

Table of Contents

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 2

1.1 Background ..................................................................................................... 2

1.2 Problem Statement .......................................................................................... 3

1.2.1 Research Objectives ................................................................................ 4

1.2.2 Research Questions ................................................................................. 5

1.3 Research Methodology ................................................................................... 5

1.4 Structure of Thesis .......................................................................................... 6

2. Urban Growth Patterns .......................................................................................... 9

2.1 Overview .......................................................................................................... 9

2.2 Literary Discourse ........................................................................................... 9

2.3 Urban Renewal ................................................................................................ 9

2.4 Urban Consolidation ...................................................................................... 14

2.5 Summary ....................................................................................................... 21

3. Housing Background in Cabramatta .................................................................... 23

3.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ 23

3.2 Renewal and Consolidation Experience ....................................................... 23

3.3 Current Implications for Future Housing ....................................................... 28

3.3 Summary ....................................................................................................... 32

4. Research Approach ............................................................................................. 35

4.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ 35

4.2 Research Methodology ................................................................................. 35

4.2.1 Interviewees ............................................................................................ 35

4.3 Interview Questions ....................................................................................... 39

4.4 Research Limitations ..................................................................................... 40

4.5 Summary ....................................................................................................... 41

ii

5. Research Findings ............................................................................................... 43

5.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ 43

5.2 Themes .......................................................................................................... 43

5.2.1 Profits and Security ................................................................................ 43

5.2.2 Local Ties ............................................................................................... 44

5.2.3 Financing ................................................................................................ 45

5.2.4 Development and Approvals Process .................................................... 48

5.2.5 Market Response .................................................................................... 50

5.2.6 Future of Development ........................................................................... 52

5.3 Summary ....................................................................................................... 53

6. Research Evaluation ............................................................................................ 56

6.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ 56

6.2 Evaluation of Findings ................................................................................... 56

6.3 Best Practice Recommendations .................................................................. 58

6.4 Summary ....................................................................................................... 63

7. Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 65

7.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ 65

7.2 Research Outcomes ...................................................................................... 65

7.3 Summary of Recommendations .................................................................... 66

7.4 Suggestions for Future Research ................................................................. 68

7.5 Final Remarks ............................................................................................... 69

8.0 Bibliography ...................................................................................................... 71

Table of Figures

Figure 1 – Research Methodology ............................................................................... 6

Figure 2 – Housing in Cabramatta ............................................................................. 26

Figure 3 – Housing in Cabramatta ............................................................................. 26

Figure 4 – Housing in Cabramatta ............................................................................. 27

Figure 5 – Housing in Cabramatta ............................................................................. 27

Figure 6 – Cabramatta in 1943 ................................................................................... 29

Figure 7 – Cabramatta in 2008 ................................................................................... 30

iii

Figure 8 – Comparison of Occupied Private Dwellings .............................................. 31

Figure 9 – Local Residential Development ................................................................ 32

Figure 10 – Makeup of Housing Component ............................................................. 32

Figure 11 – 77 Hill Street ............................................................................................ 39

Appendices

Appendix A – Approved Local Development Applications

Appendix B – Ethics Approval

1

CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION

2

1. Introduction

1.1 Background

The Metropolitan Strategy is a broad framework intended to secure Sydney’s place in

the global economy by promoting and managing growth (NSW Department of

Planning 2005). The strategy is considered as one of the most ambitious plans ever

produced to guide Sydney’s growth as it proposes approximately two-thirds of all

future housing to be in established areas, effectively signalling the reversal of past

strategies where most population growth relied on the new release areas on the

outskirts of the region (Meyer, 2005). To help to meet this target, some 95,500 new

homes have been designated for the West Central subregion, incorporating the local

government areas (LGA) of Parramatta, Bankstown, Fairfield, Auburn and Holroyd

(NSW Department of Planning 2005).

A growing body of literature however, suggests that such strategies are deemed to

fall short of the mark, brought on by an oversight of the processes needed to

implement these strategies and a lack of understanding of the issues affecting these

areas. Some of the limits, as identified by Searle, include providing adequate

capacities in infrastructure and land, the need to maintain urban vitality, mitigating the

potential loss of economic activity and meeting market demand (2003).

Other studies largely produced by Randolph and his colleagues also reveal similar

concerns invariably linked to the socio-economic profiles associated with the majority

of areas in the West Central. On one side of the equation, urban renewal and

consolidation initiatives for the West Central will have a whole raft of social enigmas

to contend with whilst on the other, there are difficulties concerning the built form and

the quality and capacity of existing housing stocks in these areas – this relates

particularly to existing strata and lot arrangements (see Ruming et al., 2007,

Randolph, 2006 and Randolph, 2008).

In light of this, the situation appears to present an irreconcilable dilemma for city

planners to preserve and promote renewal and consolidate housing (Searle, 2006;

3

Beer et al., 2007). If current practices in housing continue unchanged there is real

concern that it would tend toward even greater exacerbation of the socio-spatial

polarisation of high and low income households (Gurran, 2008). Facilitating housing

through urban renewal and consolidation initiatives in these areas therefore is likely

to face higher risks and take place over a long time span (Randolph, 2006). The do

nothing option is not an alternative either. If housing is left the way it is, it would

eventually succumb to the problems of urban decay.

The need to develop more innovative and practical solutions of development

implementation is thus imperative to ensuring that the bulk of the prescribed housing

targets are delivered effectively and sustainably. To avoid further problems for the

future, ideal solutions would need to seek for other mechanisms to strike a balance

between housing and rental affordability, production of higher quality urban design

outcomes and building performance, improvements to tenure choice and improved

provision of infrastructure and development funding. For one, various forms of public

and private industry arrangements can help achieve this (e.g. Smith, 2006 and Adair,

Berry & McGreal, 2003).

So far, policy responses like the Commonwealth Government’s National Rental

Affordability Scheme (NRAS), the recent introduction of New South Wales (NSW)

Government’s new Affordable Rental Housing - State Environmental Planning Policy

(SEPP) together with the roll out of specific housing actions in the Metropolitan

Strategy are key steps in the right direction. But more needs to be done.

As a contribution to these efforts, the thesis will reflect on interviews undertaken with

various local developers in Cabramatta to help gain a better understanding of the

issues they regard as important in shaping future housing in the area and achieving

more sustainable outcomes. It is hoped that the findings from this research task will

help inform and improve housing renewal and consolidation initiatives for the broader

subregional area.

1.2 Problem Statement

The current circumstances relating to urban renewal and consolidation in the West

Central subregion and in particular the suburb of Cabramatta can be likened to a

4

stalemate in a game of chess. As the New South Wales Government plans to

increase and renew housing in the form of higher density development, the majority

of the existing community living within these areas need, amongst other things,

betters outcomes in terms of development improvements, design quality and more

affordable housing options.

It will be difficult to satisfy these objectives. Current mechanisms and development

solutions alone have too large of a gap to fill. From the perspectives of developers,

there are too many risks for too little returns, starting from project inception to

delivery. For development to work under these models, many undesirable outcomes

are likely to happen; there is a real prospect of large scale displacement and greater

housing stress with significant social and political repercussions. The move then is

with the Government. To break this deadlock, urban renewal in the form of

consolidation must be rethought and remodeled through either improved policy and

or specialised development initiatives.

The primary objective of this thesis is to examine and distil broad lessons of best

practice property development from local housing projects in Cabramatta. It is hoped

that this will help better inform future policy and actions as well as contribute to the

existing academic body of work concerning urban consolidation and renewal. The

role of local developers and the significance of their contributions will serve a primary

feature to this. By drawing on their feedback and experiences, the thesis can attempt

to highlight possible areas of change and other styles of approach to housing

development which may produce better outcomes going forward.

1.2.1 Research Objectives

Investigations into the problem statement will comprise of the following primary and

secondary objectives:

Explore the current body of knowledge relating to urban renewal and

consolidation practices;

5

Examine the changes in housing and urban form that have occurred in

Cabramatta since post Second World War;

Investigate the role developers’ play within Cabramatta and the processes and

outcomes of recent residential projects that have occurred in the area;

Present the experiences of local developers and their views as to what they

regard as important for future housing to produce sustainable outcomes; and

Identify improvements that can to better support residential development in

Cabramatta and in turn for the broader area

1.2.2 Research Questions

To achieve the prescribed objectives, the following sets of research questions will be

used.

Primary Questions

What are the experiences of local developers in the locality?

What features of the development process has benefited them and what has

not?

In what ways can these experiences inform best practice solutions for larger

scale property development in the future for Cabramatta?

Secondary Questions

What are the representations of urban renewal and consolidation in the

current body of literature?

What is the nature of housing development in Cabramatta?

1.3 Research Methodology

Findings for the research task will be derived by investigating and assembling

together various sources of primary and secondary data (see Figure 1). Together,

they include a series of one-on-one interviews, a review of the existing body of

literature concerning urban renewal and consolidation; and an audit of recent local

development applications.

6

Figure 1 – Research Methodology

1.4 Structure of Thesis

The thesis is structured in the following chapters:

Chapter 2 – Presents the existing theoretical framework related to the primary

research. This will include a review of the relevant literature which is

concerned with urban growth patterns and the concepts of urban renewal

and consolidation.

Chapter 3 – Examines the suburb of Cabramatta as a primary case study. This

includes an inspection of the history of housing development in the area

and an analysis of the areas demographic profile. Major issues

concerning housing initiatives specific to this area will also be identified.

Chapter 4 – Describes the research approach and methodology that will be carried

out in order to obtain information about local developers in the area and

details regarding their respective housing projects.

Review of Urban Renewal and Consolidation Literature

Data Assembly

Research Findings

One-on-one interviews with local developers

Local Development Audit

7

Chapter 5 – Presents an evaluation findings derived from the primary research task.

In this chapter, the key experiences relating to individual development

projects, from inception to the areas of finance, construction, design, the

approvals process and sales will be put forward.

Chapter 6 – Discusses the findings derived from the primary research task and will

present some recommendations on best practice mechanisms which

could be adopted.

Chapter 7 – Concludes the thesis by extrapolating together all of the knowledge

presented. It will summarise the key recommendations as provided as

part of the discussion found within the research evaluation. It will also

reflect on how this knowledge can be transferred onto improved housing

renewal and consolidation solutions for the broader area.

8

CHAPTER TWO – URBAN GROWTH PATTERNS

9

2. Urban Growth Patterns

2.1 Overview

The purpose of this chapter is to examine the current body of knowledge of which the

primary research of this paper is contributing to. The tour will begin with a review of

the relevant literature concerning urban growth patterns and management practices.

The framework will establish the necessary groundwork and understanding which will

serve as the prelude to subsequent chapters.

2.2 Literary Discourse

Urban environments need to constantly respond to a whole host of factors, the result

of which determines its particular form and function. These factors may include

changes in government reforms, shifts in the economy, household characteristics,

employment, population growth and migration as well as the demands and

constraints from the natural environment to name a few. For many governments,

urban renewal and consolidation is seen more and more as the conduit necessary to

respond to issues. For example, these may include urban decay, changes to local

demographics and dysfunctions in local market economies, space or communities.

The following sections in this chapter will identify and discuss the benefits and issues

relating to the role of urban renewal and urban consolidation as examined in the

current literature.

2.3 Urban Renewal

Renewal is by no means a new concept. It is a process which has been widely used

ever since humans first realised that there was a need to replace or alter a particular

development or a collection of them. The process comes about through many

different reasons, including the advent of new architectural philosophies and with it

the introduction of new materials and improvements in craftsmanship. Gradual

degradation and catastrophes brought on by natural disasters and even through war

can also be some of the precursors to renewal procedures.

10

The term urban renewal is essentially the same concept. The reference to the term

“urban” implies a particular focus on renewal activities taking place in settings of

contemporary cities and towns; places which are shaped and supported by complex

road networks and other infrastructure utilities, varying distributions of demographic

profiles and higher population counts, larger varieties of housing types and living

conditions, varying land use clusters and suburbia to name a few. A wide collection

of discussions in the urban planning studies literature pay particular attention to this

concept. Sometimes referred to as urban revitalisation or regeneration, the following

conceptual frameworks offered by some observers encapsulates many of the

important dimensions relevant to the practice today.

“Urban revitalisation, the rekindling and revaluing of human activities and interests in

cities following the social, cultural and technological changes of the past

decades...includes elements of renovation, restoration and redevelopment...” (Taylor

& Newtown 1985: 1)

“Problems of economic decline, social and economic change and physical and

environmental dereliction may combine in particular localities to create or reinforce

poverty, disadvantage and deprivation. Regeneration represents a response to these

problems, seeking to promote greater prosperity, wider social inclusion and an

enhanced quality of life for local communities. It is a long-term process, linking

economic, social and environmental issues and policies” (Smith, 2006)

“Urban renewal is the term given to the combined efforts of public agencies and

private individuals to revitalise urban areas by maintaining, rehabilitating or

redeveloping properties to make them more suited to future needs. The urban

renewal concept is usually applied to situations of environmental decline which offer

potential for improvement. In the past this potential has been seen mainly in terms of

physical improvement, with an emphasis on redevelopment.” (Department of

Environment, Housing and Community Development 1977 pp. vii)

As we see in these frameworks, the notion of physical improvement continues to be

the centre piece in urban renewal rationale. Beyond this concept, we see that in the

contemporary context, urban renewal is closely associated to influences coming

11

largely in part from political, legal, economic, technical, environmental and

sociological aspects. That said, there is an overriding perception that urban renewal

projects almost always results in outcomes better than circumstances prior to its

undertaking – which begs one to ask, relevant to areas of low-income

neighbourhoods, is this necessarily the case? Some case studies detailing urban

renewal procedures and outcomes have helped provide some critical insight to better

understanding contemporary concerns

In the British context, regeneration initiatives undertaken in Birmingham provide

some evidence to the effects of physical and economic restructuring on surrounding

residential districts (Cameron and Doling, 1994). Introduced in light of the economic

downturn that was occurring around the 1980’s, regeneration strategies were devised

to reverse this trend by broadening the city’s economic base of industry to more

service-sector oriented (DiGaetano and Klemanski, 1993). To do this, the city council

adopted a CBD-focused model of regeneration as its primary vehicle for securing the

city's economic future, promoting Birmingham as an international centre for business

tourism, leisure and culture, and attracting footloose inward private-sector investment

and jobs (Loftman and Nevin, 1992). This was undertaken with pragmatic approach

to local development, the result of this has had profound effects on the recovery and

growth of the city (Carley 1991).

For social residential land uses, it was found that the outcomes of regeneration

initiatives had not resulted in issues of displacement and affordability. Cameron and

Doling proposes that the resistance to gentrification from these areas is attributed

primarily to the fact that a large proportion of housing is in the ownership of the local

authority and where in the instances that transfers take place, it is usually sold to

non-profit providers (1994). In effect this has reduced the potential for displacement

and maintains the affordability of housing in the area. There have however been

some criticisms which have developed as a result of regeneration initiatives in

relation to access to economic opportunities available to low-income

neighbourhoods. This is highlighted by Barber and Hall as they point out that

economic difficulties and wider disadvantage experienced by much of the city’s

population and many of its neighbourhoods have continued to endure and even

deepened despite the efforts of numerous area-based regeneration programmes

12

(2008). This is seen as a result largely due to the fact that low income

neighbourhoods are excluded and insulated from economic change and regeneration

in the city (Cameron and Doling, 1994).

The experience in South Korea also reveals more extreme circumstances. In urban

Korea, Ha explains that largely due to the interests of white-collar workers,

government interests in macroeconomic concerns and profiteering, housing

regeneration projects have systematically reduced the availability of housing in the

areas where low-income families are concentrated (2007). Although the focus of

such initiatives may have been on improving the physical deterioration of buildings

and distressed neighbourhoods spearheaded by joint venture private enterprise, the

actual outcomes have provided little consideration for the social and cultural capital

of low-income neighbourhoods (Ha, 2007). As such, whilst catering for those more

financially capable, Korea’s housing renewal projects have caused other socio-

economic problems such as the collapse of low-income communities through eviction

and affordability – much to which is instigated by the lack of understanding of what

these communities really need (Ha, 2007).

Clearly, there is an interesting contrast existing between the intended outcomes

supplied by the urban renewal frameworks and the outcomes described in the

renewal case studies presented. Whilst it is acknowledge that although the case

studies are not representative of all renewal projects for distressed neighbourhoods,

particularly for those that have been successful, it does supply greater perspective on

the possible issues and complications arising from these initiatives. By exploring such

cases and others alike (see Turok, 1992 and Lawless, 1994), it is realised that the

key issues which dominate renewal in such neighbourhoods include the risk of

displacement, housing affordability and social equity. It is also important to keep in

mind that these issues stem from the point of view in favour of existing communities.

In contemplation of Barber and Halls question “whose urban renaissance?” – there is

a realisation governing bodies and other stakeholders face unique obstacles as well.

For government, this can be because of the need to fulfil political goals whereas in

private industry for instance, this would appropriately be the need to make a profit.

13

In light of all this, what is it about renewal in low income areas that creates the

potential for such problems? Of the many possible factors, one key theme is solely

attributable to this. This theme is governance – its style of approach, ability to

coordinate, and the mechanisms it creates in addressing renewal initiatives in a

particular area. Jones and Evans describe this in the sense of the inability of

government to act because too much emphasis is placed upon policy tools or due to

the difficulties of achieving co-operative action (2006).

As highlighted by Hackworth (2003, see also Cook & Ruming, 2008; Zhu, 1997 and

Schall, 2001), policies are invariably linked to different political doctrines of those

governments which design and implement them. Because of this, approaches in

policies have had significant impacts to the efficiency of achieving outcomes aligning

themselves to either socio-democratic or neo-liberal values. Social democratic

approaches are considered as policies which embrace a higher degree of

government led interventions and promote a centralisation of policies (Baker, 1999),

whereas neoliberalism is said to represent those frameworks of political and

economic authority that champions market operation and efficiency over a wide

range of social relations (Brenner & Theodore, 2002).

In terms of alleviating those impacts which have emerged, it is generally found that

low income residential renewal projects involving a high degree of direct government

intervention are more capable in dealing with such issues. Such examples may

include government-led increases to the supply in social housing stocks and rent

control to name a few. Studies undertaken by Milligan, Dielman & Kempen into the

impacts of housing policies on low-income households in Australia and the

Netherlands illustrate this point (2006).

On this note, it is rather odd that governments in cities across the world are tending

to adopt neoliberal approaches to redevelopment policy instead (see Shenjing &

Fulong, 2009 and Addie, 2008). Baum explains that this is attributable to growing

need push for integration into the global economy, for matters of competitiveness,

prosperity and development at the level of the nation state (1997). With reference to

the regeneration of low-income neighbourhoods, there seems to be somewhat of a

paradox. Brenner and Theodore similarly share this point of view and at the same

14

time shed light to the idea that perhaps more holistic approaches, those that

incorporate all areas and groups into the renewal process, would be of a better

remedy. They state:

“On one hand, while neoliberalism aspires to create a “utopia” of free markets

liberated from all forms of state interference, it has in practice entailed a dramatic

intensification of coercive, disciplinary forms of state intervention in order to impose

market rule upon all aspects of social life...on the other hand, whereas neoliberal

ideology implies that self-regulating markets will generate an optimal allocation of

investments and resources, neoliberal political practice has generated pervasive

market failures, new forms of social polarization, and a dramatic intensification of

uneven development at all spatial scales.” (Brenner and Theodore 2002)

The practice of urban renewal initiatives in distressed neighbourhoods as explored so

far involves a complex range of processes affecting many people. Through critical

extrapolation of urban renewal frameworks it is clear that the successes and failures

are primarily derived from the quality, style and effectiveness of governance. This

would usually depend upon co-operation, partnership and the integration of different

programmes and policies, adopting a holistic approach at an appropriate

geographical scale (Smith, 2006 p 271). Having examined example cases studies

and similar to what Zhu states, it is clear that governance which brings about greater

capacity for more direct government intervention seems indispensable not only to

make market operations efficient, but also to achieve other non-economic goals

(1997). This is a vital necessity to the regeneration of neighbourhoods in distress.

2.4 Urban Consolidation

Urban consolidation has been a point of interest and debate amongst scholars,

planning practitioners, sociologists, demographers and the like for many decades. As

such, there is a vast variety of literature available with the bulk of it examining the

concept’s impressions on past and contemporary planning regimes, its perceived and

measured benefits as well as drawbacks; and it’s environmental, social and

economic impacts. To better understanding of the relationship shared between

density and the built form, Scoffham and Vale (2005) challenges us by asking:

15

“...Does it mean that buildings, and with them the functions of urban life, should be

close together; closer together than is now common? Does it mean, inter alia, an

increase in density, so that more people and, one might expect, more urban functions

are located within a given area?...”

Taking this into consideration and with regard to the general consensus found across

the literature, an appropriate definition of the concept could be defined as a means

by which more people can be brought into existing residential areas where the

necessary infrastructure such as public transport, schools and utilities are already in

place (Smith 1997). Having explored the notion of renewal, it can be seen that

consolidation is a form of renewal practice. With regard to the planning practice, it is

also important to note that it does not refer to one single policy, but rather a number

of related land use measures and housing initiatives that can increase residential

densities. (NSW Department of Environment and Planning, 1984 p. 1, sourced from

Bunker et al 2002) As one may have figured already, some commentators choose to

use other terms such as compact city, centralist planning, urban compaction or

containment, densification and other more trendy variants like transport oriented

design (TOD) and smart growth in their works to describe principally the same

method of approach to developing the urban form.

Based on this framework, we continue by exploring the strengths of this concept.

Firstly, it requires that urban consolidation concentrates first and foremost on

increased residential densities. This suggests that by doing so, the densification of

residential land uses underwrites the perceived benefits of living in consolidated

areas. This thought is rather logical. For example, we see in Greenberg’s et al work,

the provision of infrastructure is described to be more cost effective, as it does not

demand for entirely new systems to be installed, by utilising existing capacities by

grouping people closer together (2001). Secondly, the need for common visions and

comprehensive coordination between policy makers and key stakeholders are also

emphasised. This further challenges us to think of consolidated areas, and if one

would like the urban fabric as a whole, as perhaps a physical by-product of land

management practices and governmental quality.

16

Throughout the literature, the debate between urban consolidation and urban sprawl

is a notable standout, with both doctrines gaining as much support as the other.

Breheny describes that the debate between the two concepts has shifted from the

traditional grounds based on the quality of urban and rural life and the aesthetics of

urbanity to more contemporary concerns of sustainable development (2005). That is

not to say that those traditional arguments have disappeared altogether.

Nevertheless, as the topical issue of global warming and climate change draws

growing interest from governments across the world, the urban consolidation

approach has been reviewed as an effective way of enhancing a city’s economy

whilst offering increased benefits of mitigating development and population impacts

onto the environment.

The potential benefits of urban consolidation as described by the then NSW

Department of Environment and Planning, include land savings, more affordable

housing, economising on infrastructure, reducing natural resource use in the form of

energy and water demand, and widening housing choices (1984; see also Holliday,

2000). A range of papers reflect on these benefits, questioning the integrity of these

claims but also providing a critical insight to the whole issue of sustainability. Where

studies have been found to focus on a particular variable, many other areas have yet

to be investigated. We continue our tour by examining some broad accounts of these

discussions.

Contrary to the belief that urban consolidation enables greater housing affordability,

some critics in the field have condemned it as being a catalyst to the problem.

Proponents generally argue that by imposing urban growth boundaries onto the

fringes of the city, the restriction of new supplies of land would place a premium on

existing urban areas for either sale or redevelopment prospects. Alan Moran

attempts to show that the connection to housing affordability is bizarre; as it is

understood in his work, urban consolidation, or as he prefers, “land rationing” would

obstruct the natural development of domestic housing market sentiment and

reactions (2006). He goes further by asserting that this would systematically

undermine the fiscal incentives for local governments to provide for those seeking to

enter the home-owning market. His argument does carry some weight, especially

17

when one starts to think about the possible repercussions onto lower income groups

in society in terms of housing and rental affordability.

Criticisms aside, having to test and to prove this relationship is not at all an easy

task. This is because the empirical case studies examined throughout the literature

are often subject to a varying range of political, geographic, cultural, social and

economic settings. Where studies have consistently found urban containment

policies contributing to housing price inflation in areas where they are imposed, there

is general disagreement among scholars over the nature of these effects and the

appropriate way to measure them (see Dawkins and Nelson, 2002). As we see, prior

to their study of the Melbourne housing market and its relationship to consolidation

policies, Hans and O’Connor adopted the view that whilst urban consolidation could

be seen as a source of additional supply, it was also a stimulus to demand. (2008).

Despite this and having concluded later that the relationship was more or less valid,

they did stress that the outcome may only hold true in certain areas and that urban

consolidation policies alone are not powerful in explaining the price changes.

In reminding us that urban environments are definitely complex places, Burton’s

findings from her examination of urban consolidation in the UK contends that housing

is more expensive in a compact city. But like Hans and O’Connor after her, she

attributes the trend to other elements. When intervening variables are taken into

account, compactness is not the most important determinant of affordability, the

proportion of more-affluent residents is far more significant; affordability is probably,

therefore, most strongly related to the demand for housing, and the density of

housing in a city is simply a reflection of this demand. (Burton, 2000). Therefore, as

Smyth elaborates, most households will effectively have to have large incomes in

order to be able to afford the house purchases and rents (1999).

Results from these findings are interesting and does provide a unique and rather

provocative perspective of the entire situation. Conclusions from the broad range of

international cases investigated by Dawkins and Nelson helps bring this into

perspective. The effects of urban containment appear to be much more dependent

on the style of policy implementation, the structure of local housing markets, the

18

pattern of existing land ownership, and the stringency of other local regulations

(2002).

Going hand in hand with the issue of affordability, we now shift our focus a little over

to the notion of housing choice and diversity. Advocates of this idea are confronted

with strong evidence in the literature, which have been gathered by deconstructing

down to important contributing factors which may have been overlooked in the first

instance. One example is revealed by Bunker et al. Planning for higher density

housing has been undertaken with little explicit recognition of the housing sub-

markets, who higher density housing caters for or their specific spatial characteristics

within the city (2005). This highlights one important point and that is how urban

consolidation policies, although seen as a means of providing additional supply, can

be disconnected to the demographic profile; which would affect how it relates to the

nature of how people choose. The state of play in the Melbourne and Sydney

housing markets as analysed by Yates is a prime example of this. Where urban

consolidation has been promoted to as a means of greater diversity and choice,

Yates concludes that whilst an increasing number of households have opted for

higher density housing options, they have done so only when constrained by income

in meeting their location and tenure preferences (2007)

The general impression one is left with from the discussions above is that urban

consolidation does seem to instigate affordability problems but at the same time the

reason for a greater range of housing stock. This might seem to increase housing

choice; but in reality it is only increased as much as one’s income permits. All this

appears to result from the potential disregard of urban consolidation in meeting of the

needs and preferences of the population.

The connection between urban consolidation and the provision of infrastructure is

also another prime area of focus. Throughout various conceptual analyses and

empirical studies, the discussions revolve around the issue of whether or not

infrastructure provision in contained urban forms would be more economically

efficient and thus making it the preferential choice over urban sprawl. As it stands,

the current body of work suggests otherwise as we will see.

19

For pro-consolidators, the benefit of the concept is largely based on a higher rate of

infrastructure utilisation. It is argued that, in a compact city, not only are households

in closer proximity to facilities but there are also likely to be a greater number of

facilities per head of population because minimum densities of population are

required for facilities such as retail to be economically viable (see Collie, 1990;

Bromley and Thomas, 1993; Fyfe, 1994). This is all good, but as Hopkins et al

(economies of scale in wastewater treatment) raises the point, do the cost savings

from growth patterns that take advantage of economies of scale in infrastructure,

sufficiently justify the costs of plans, incentives, and regulations necessary to achieve

such patterns?

Searle and in particular Troy, provide critical insights at this point. As seen in their

works, the notion of infrastructure efficiency under urban consolidation seems to be

misguided. Firstly, by inspecting Sydney’s existing infrastructure system, Searle

draws our attention to the potential limits of infrastructure capacity, incorporating

water and drainage, public open space and transport facilities for consolidated areas

(2003). The assertions made regarding the key challenges involving the limited ability

of existing infrastructure to meet demand and the need to repair and replace obsolete

systems suggest that there could be a very significant cost factor involved. Troy’s

critical assessment of urban consolidation in the Australian context substantiates

these ideas by arguing that facilities are already under-provided in the inner areas

and would be even more expensive to provide there than in new outer areas (1996,

pp. 58). Most intriguing and perhaps the most damaging of all, he alerts us to the

erroneous assumptions of pro consolidators regarding infrastructure rollout.

It is very rare development in urban Australia for lots to be so provided with services

or have access to facilities at the outset...Most services and facilities are provided in

a lagged response to demand...It is therefore misleading to imply that the full

provision of services and facilities occurs as lots are developed (Troy 1996, pp. 59)

The debate over urban consolidation and its environmental merits shares the same

controversy. As concerns over energy consumption, resource depletion and

environment deprivation continue, this component contributes a lot to the compact

city justification. The environmental arguments supporting urban consolidation lay

20

claims that compact cities use less fossil fuels, emit less greenhouse gases, enable

more attractive public transport types to be provided, and conserve agricultural and

water catchment areas (Smith, 1997). The benefits described are seen to result from

a combination of compact city features which include shorter travel distances and

greater public transport utilisation. Developments in compact cities are also said to

require less energy for heating and air conditioning, decrease the need for watering

large lawns, have fewer swimming pools, and offer less of chance of contaminating

reservoirs and underground water supplies in the protected open spaces

(Greenberg’s et al, 2001).

However, similar to previous sections, we find that the contention is centred on the

legitimacy of these environmental savings. Again, it is Troy who comes to the

forefront by stating that consolidation initiatives are more likely to result in negative

outcomes.

We see that increasing housing density:

actually decreases our capacity to cope with domestic wastes and our

opportunities for recycling;

reduces our capacity to harvest or otherwise cope with the rainfall on urban

areas and reduce runoff;

makes it harder for urban residents to produce much of their own food;

increases air pollution because it reduces space for growth of trees and

shrubs to purify the air and cool the urban area;

reduces chances of growth of wood for fuel and reduces habitats for birds and

other native fauna;

increases congestion which increases accidents and energy losses.

(1996, pp. 129)

Studies undertaken by Barrett and Breheny are not as critical, but similarly downplay

the perceived environmental benefits. They suggest that the trade-offs required to

achieve these aims would lead to a worse off position and that any savings made

would be minimal (Barrett 1996, Breheny, 1995).

21

2.5 Summary

This chapter has examined the current body of knowledge relevant to the themes of

this thesis. In doing so, it has explored the concepts, ideas, examples and debates

relating to the processes of urban renewal and consolidation. Specifically it has

highlighted the relationship of government, policy, private industry, the community as

well as the environment.

Urban patterns have been a crucial part in the development of issues and

opportunities. In the context of Sydney, it is vitally important to gain a better

understanding of these processes and how they have shaped current capacities for

growth in Cabramatta.

22

CHAPTER THREE – HOUSING BACKGROUNG IN CABRAMATTA

23

3. Housing Background in Cabramatta

3.1 Overview

This chapter aims to convey an illustration of the context of housing in Cabramatta.

Initially it will provide a brief review of the history of Sydney’s planning policies and

subsequent growth patterns which took hold. Specifically, it will present examples of

those housing outcomes in Cabramatta which have eventuated as a result of these

initiatives. An analysis of current day issues relating to future housing initiatives will

also be provided thereafter.

3.2 Renewal and Consolidation Experience

Urban housing strategies have had a profound effect on the nature of growth patterns

in Sydney. Like many other observers, tracing the history of its development and the

planning documents which set the direction for growth makes it possible to ascertain

the planning mentality occurring within New South Wales and moreover offers an

insight into the nature of the renewal and consolidation experience concerning

residential developments which came to be in Cabramatta.

In a general sense, housing policy interventions in Australia were triggered by severe

housing shortages and strong population growth (Milligan, Dieleman and Kempen

2006). In the first half of the twentieth century, Sydney’s urban development changed

from the dense built form of the nineteenth century to low density suburban

development, aided by increasing ownership of motor cars (Searle, 2007). Initially

during the period following the Second World War, Meyer describes that

development was shaped by plans within the 1948-1951 County of Cumberland

Scheme which proposed a greenbelt to contain urban growth, with any expansion to

be in satellite towns (2005).

The blueprint for this plan, however, was to face significant challenges as this period

was marked by return of servicemen and a large influx of migrants whom largely sort

housing through the access of cheap and plentiful land which resulted in high rates of

homeownership and relatively how housing costs (Stretton, 1989).Contributions to

24

housing from both the Commonwealth and state government were also pretty

significant during this period, whereby in 1954 government assistance accounted for

some 40% of finance for new housing (Dalton, 1999). Additional housing for New

South Wales during this period was facilitated by the introduction of the

Commonwealth State Housing Agreement (CSHA), a mechanism designed to allow

state governments to buy land and build public rental housing using low-cost loans

for low-income families (Pugh, 1976). This was later revised to provide mortgage

finance for home purchase and sitting tenants were encouraged to buy public

housing under favourable rice and lending conditions (Milligan, 2003). The combined

effect of these domestic affairs resulted in the subsequent growth beyond the

greenbelt, establishing more of a moving boundary to urban expansion which was

revised periodically to accommodate growth through rezoning for urban purposes

and as a result suburban development at this stage was usually in the form of the

separate house on its own block (Beer, 1999 and Bunker 2002).

The development context in this period also propagated through to the logic and

vision of the Sydney Region Outline Plan. As Cardew reveals, growth was expected

to continue unabated and major societal change was not anticipate by planners; and

so the strategy departed from the greenbelt notions of the preceding plan and

concentrated to coordinate development and ensure government infrastructure

investment met the requirements of growth (1998). In general, the concept was for

corridors to be focused on established rail lines radiating from the CBD, in the form of

new towns, each with its own town centre and each with its own industrial areas and

tertiary education campuses (Meyer 2005). The introduction of strata title legislation

supported this as it was designed to help facilitate major expansion of higher density

residential development by allowing the ownership of individual apartments

(Randolph 2006a). Inevitably though, the vision of the plan was stifled due to the

changes in the demography which are traced back to the unexpected falls in the

average household size and the gentrification of inner city suburbs (Kendig, 1979).

Characterised by much of those separate block developments and now

concentrations of higher density developments, the result of the miscalculations had

lead to a significant underutilisation of infrastructure that had been put in place

(Bunker, Holloway and Randolph, 2005).

25

Moving forward, planners later found themselves confronted with further challenges.

For one, the divergence of capital funding from the Commonwealth had planners

meant that planners needed to consider strategies which would primarily reduce

expenditure on infrastructure (Searle 2007). Urban consolidation and redevelopment

of existing urban areas was to be the answer to containing ongoing sprawl of

residential development. Similar to that of Troy, Milligan and others considered more

recently that the up-take of neo-liberal policy reforms helped this transition as it

enabled market-based housing provision which resulted in the New South Wales

Government relying more heavily on private involvement in the planning, financing,

and delivery of large-scale residential development projects (1999 and 2006, also

see Cook & Ruming 2008). Changes to existing policies which allowed medium

density development to take place along with market demand led to the building of

dual occupancy developments and large numbers of three-storey walk-up flats either

as initial development or as part of a redevelopment process (Bunker, Holloway &

Randolph, 2005). This proved to be effective to the cause as subsequent brownfield

developments which took place in the 1990s and early 21st century allowed the State

Government to wind down outer area land releases as 70% of all dwellings were

provided in the established areas but created the impetus for affordability issues

(Meyer, 2005). In Fairfield’s local government area, Randolph and Holloway showed

that multi-unit dwellings outstripped new houses in absolute terms between 1991 and

2001 (2005). A majority of developments in Cabramatta currently still in use today

are an example of those developments (refer to figures 2, 3, 4 and 5). Emphasis to

the state of decline to these buildings should also be noted.

26

Figure 2 – Housing in Cabramatta (Taing 2009)

Figure 3 – Housing in Cabramatta (Taing 2009)

27

Figure 4 – Housing in Cabramatta (Taing 2009)

Figure 5 – Housing in Cabramatta (Taing 2009)

28

It is by the same token and together with the more contemporary focus of the New

South Wales Government to tackle housing affordability issues and reposition

Metropolitan Sydney as a competitive global city which has lead to the adoption of

the City of Cities strategic planning document introduced in 2005. Under the strategy,

the urban growth pattern is expected to evolve by converging to support the existing

decentralised footprint with particular emphasis on the development of multiple sub-

centres (NSW Department of Planning, 2005). This approach is considered by

Ingram to be the ideal solution in addressing issues of population growth,

employment and infrastructure provision to name a few (1998) Moreover within this

strategic context, the traditional reliance on new release areas have been largely

discounted whereby 60 and 70 per cent of future development have been proposed

to occur within existing built-up areas and the residual 30 per cent being catered for

in perimeter development zones to the north-west and south-west of the existing

urban area (Jensen, 2006). This is anticipated to be in the form of surrounding

existing infrastructure facilities – namely rail, with high density residential housing

(NSW Department of Planning, 2005).

3.3 Current Implications for Future Housing

The planning and development context explored so far reveals that housing growth

patterns have effectively shifted away from its sprawling tendencies to more of the

practice of consolidation through regeneration. In recent times, the move is seen to

stem from economic growth strategies and the competitive cities rationale. With this

change, it is also noticed that the role of government remained consistently minimal

throughout the course of development. The range of direct and indirect subsidies

developed to support private investment in housing for homeownership has

undoubtedly characterised the nature of contemporary residential land uses across

Sydney (Beer, Kearins & Pieters, 2007).

Given the housing and development context built up so far, future capacity for

renewal and consolidation in Cabramatta, as envisaged by the Metropolitan Strategy

would most likely be a challenging task to accomplish. Unlike circumstances of the

past, the canvas to which development is proposed to take place presents unique

obstacles – the result of many have come about through the accumulative effect of

past regimes. The aerial photographs (figures 6 and 7) demonstrate this; whereby in

29

just over 60 years, the nature of housing development and tenure in Cabramatta is

found to have significantly changed through phases of redevelopment and

consolidation.

 Figure 6 – Cabramatta in 1943 (SKM 2007, sourced from the Department of Lands SIX viewer)

30

 Figure 7 – Cabramatta in 2008 (SKM 2008, sourced from the Department of Lands SIX viewer) In Cabramatta, the long-running contributions of these features have had a profound

impact shaping the current urban landscape, community and capacities in housing.

Up until this point in time, it is regard that the quality of housing in Cabramatta has

become amongst the poorest in Sydney, consisting a mix of poor quality fibro

housing and street after street of 3-4 story gun-barrel walk-ups whereby the former

exists predominantly in the form of highly fragmented suburban lots and the latter is

identified to be entrenched with issues of multiple ownership and strata titling

(Randolph, 2008 and Easthope & Randolph, 2009).

A comparison of Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) census data collected in 2001

and 2006 has also revealed that the number of those dwellings that are occupied

have experienced a downward trend across all categories with the only increase

occurring in separate homes (see figure 8). Whilst the timeframe taken for

comparison may be limited, this data does indicate that market-based solutions to

renewal and consolidation which is unlikely be effective this time round. This comes

31

especially when the majority of local residential developments have been somewhat

stagnate in terms of providing a broad range and higher densities. The result of the

local development audit has revealed residential development related applications

make up for up to 45% of all applications approved the last 9 month period. This

component is comprised predominantly of developments for double storey detached

dwellings (41%) and alterations and additions to existing dwellings (34%) (see figures

9, 10 and Appendix A).

Together with fact that the area has become home to many of the migrant

populations as well as many of the disadvantaged located by way of low income

private rental housing tenures, the current situation seemingly demands more

innovation in strategy and implementation mechanisms to carry future housing

through – which so far none has been devised as yet (Bunker et al 2005a, Sherry,

2006)

 Figure 8 – Comparison of Occupied Private Dwellings (source ABS Census Data 2001 and 2006)

32

 Figure 9 – Local Residential Development

 Figure 10 – Makeup of Housing Component

3.3 Summary

Since post Second World War, urban policies have unequivocally shaped the

development of housing characteristics throughout the city and in particular in those

areas around Cabramatta; the result of which has offered valuable insight to the

planning mentality of the state towards housing provision. Critical to this, is the

understanding the nature of those mechanisms which have been put in place and the

outcomes produced as a result. For one, it is clear to see that the minimal role of

33

government in directly supplying housing in New South Wales has played a major

part in explaining the constant shortage of household numbers available to meet

demand and the creation of various sub-markets. In Cabramatta and areas alike,

Bunker, Holloway and Randolph have identified that this has been characterised by

financially and socially distressed households (2005a).

In more recent times, it was found that the majority of local residential developments

are in the form of low density tenures. This comes with both positive and potentially

negative implications affecting the future prospects of housing affordability, potential

for displacement and continued physical distress. In light of this, future housing must

be re-addressed with alternative policy approaches designed to better respond to

existing building and environmental constraints as well as those social changes and

issues which have developed as a result of the past.

34

CHAPTER FOUR – RESEARCH APPROACH

35

4. Research Approach

4.1 Overview

The purpose of this chapter is to detail the primary research approach and methods

that were designed to address the problem statement. As well as providing details of

local developers whom were interviewed and explaining the significance of their

involvement, this section follows by examining the research topics explored and

limitations involved.

4.2 Research Methodology

Qualitative research is concerned with exploring the understandings and meanings

that people attribute to their social world (Walter, 2006, pp. 11). Case studies would

bring a range of factors into a common analysis, but perhaps more importantly, the

depth of understanding they offer is increasingly seen as critical in analysing wider

socio-political processes (Yin, 1986 sourced in Jones & Evans, 2006)

As such, a qualitative approach was designed to investigate the problem statement.

This involved conducting a series of in-depth face-to-face interviews with local

developers to access their perspective and experiences with local development

projects. Walter (2006, pp. 205) considers that this approach would be the best

means of acquiring quality data. The research approach continues by providing a

thematic analysis of the responses gathered.

Local developers were considered preferable candidates for the research task

because of their experience and connections to the area. They are the also the group

of people most likely to play a major part in renewal and consolidation processes into

the future.

4.2.1 Interviewees

The research project was implemented over a 1 month period following an initial

selection process for potential candidates. The criteria were based on two conditions.

Firstly, they had to have undertaken a housing project within or around the vicinity of

36

Cabramatta. To ensure that each case was carefully selected as a way of capturing a

key quality of interest to the research (Walter, 2006, pp. 283); the second

qualification limited the selection process to two per residential development

category.

The potential candidates were sourced in a variety of ways. Information from local

development applications, real estate agents and sourcing local housing providers

had generated a list of 8 potential candidates. Requests for interview sessions were

made out via email and subsequently followed up with phone calls. Of the 8 potential

candidates, 6 had responded and 2 were omitted from the process because there

was no reply. Of those candidates whom had responded, 5 had agreed to an

interview whilst the remaining 1 had declined to take part. The following table

identifies the profiles of the 5 participating interviewees.

Participant Profile Interview

Detail Mrs Tieu Nghi

Maung

Mrs Maung had been residing in the local

area since first arriving to Australia some

20 years ago. Because of this, she has

developed a strong relationship with the

area and is familiar with the local

community. She is currently employed on a

full-time basis in the city and lives with her

husband in Burwood.

13 Sept 2009

Mr Wilson Chang Mr Chang arrived in Australia some 25

years ago and settled within the local area.

He has since changed residences twice

within the locality. Mr Chang is married with

children and runs a small courier business

catering predominantly for deliveries in the

western suburbs.

12 Sept 2009

Mr Thi Lim Mr Lim and his family arrived and settle in

the local area in 1970. His father had

established a successful restaurant

28 Aug 2009

37

Participant Profile Interview Detail

business which is currently in operation

today. As such, Mr Lim takes part in

overseeing the running of the business

now and again. He was once employed as

a local real estate agent, but is now

involved in the insulation business. Having

moved out of the family home in Cecil Hills,

Mr Lim currently resides in Cabramatta.

Cliff La Mr La was born in Australia, son to migrant

parents. Currently residing just outside

Cabramatta in the suburb of Canley

Heights, he is employed as a business

banker for a major bank.

3 Sept 2009

Local Developer X

(Identification

Withheld)

Developer X migrated and settled into the

local area with his family. Most members of

the family including Developer X got into

various types of businesses ranging from

groceries to finance to construction. Since

moving out of the original family home, all

members of the family have sort newer

residencies in and around Cabramatta.

Currently, Developer X is semi-retired and

is involved in the building industry.

31 Aug 2009

The inclusion of Mrs Maung and Mr Chang were necessary for forming perspectives

and opinions from local developers engaged in small scale residential renewal and

consolidation projects in the area. In Mrs Maung’s case, she undertook a residential

redevelopment project for investment purposes. The project required the demolition

of an existing fibro house and the erection of a two storey duplex. Her property is

located just outside the northern boundary of Cabramatta in the suburb of Canley

Heights. Similarly, Mr Chang has also undertaken a residential redevelopment project

38

incorporating the erection of another duplex development for living and investment

purposes.

The choice to select Mr Thi Lim as a participant for the research task was based on

the need to represent the opinions of owner occupiers whom engage in projects

resulting primarily in renewed residential outcomes only. In Mr. Lim’s case, he had

redeveloped his previous single storey brick home to a new double storey dwelling.

Cases like Mr Lim’s are prominent in Cabramatta and therefore are of a particular

interest to the research task. Mr Lim intends to engage in a potential duplex project

within the near future.

Cliff La is also an owner occupier. The residential project undertaken with his brother,

involved refurbishment works to his existing double storey brick dwelling, the

subdivision of land and the construction of a new double storey dwelling on the

resulting new lot. The creation of an easement running away from the street and into

the lot provides access to the newly erected dwelling.

On the condition that their identification be withheld, securing the interview with

Developer X was also very crucial in providing a representation for local townhouse

development in the area. Developer X was involved in a family consortium which

spearheaded a residential housing project. Specific project works included the need

for site amalgamation and the construction of a new multi-unit townhouse

development. The development lies just east of Cabramatta in the suburb of Canley

Vale.

The unfortunate decline from the owner of the block of units at 77 Hill Street has

meant that the research task has been limited in providing insights for a broader

range of residential development categories. Recent redevelopment works

undertaken at the block of units incorporated facade upgrades, landscaping, whole of

building re-wiring and re-plumbing, and associated security upgrades. If the interview

had been accepted, this case would have greatly contributed to the research task as

it makes for a good insight into addressing the issues affecting older style unit blocks

and townhouse developments in the area. As such, this has created some potential

scope for future studies to investigate.

39

Figure 11 – 77 Hill Street (Taing 2009)

4.3 Interview Questions

The focus of questions designed for the interview process was aimed at drawing out

how local developers thought and interpreted what they have done. This would allow

them to explain a great deal about how and why they did what they did (Walter, 2006

pp. 35). Following the likes of Brenner et al semi-structured interviews were used to

capture formal and informal aspects of the respective projects and to allow flexibility

in accordance with the varying time-constraints of different interviewees (1985 cited

in Jones and Evans 2005). Approximately 20–30 minutes were used to focus upon

standard areas of focus concerning the project, followed by a relatively unstructured

discussion of variable length used to explore opinions and less formal aspects of

projects and interviewee’s involvement (Jones & Evans, 2005). Probing questions

were also used intermittently throughout the interviews to help expand on certain

areas of interest.

40

Generally, the interview questions were guided by covering the following broad topic

areas.

Motivations of the project

Contingencies of the project/risks

Benefits of the project

Project management

Site assembly and strata issues

Feasibility

What would they have done differently?

Perspectives on current development policies

4.4 Research Limitations

The adopted research approach encountered certain limitations and constraints

which would have affected the outcomes of the investigation. On the point of scale,

the number of interviewees whom were willing to participate in the process limited the

scope of perspectives and opinions that could be retrieved. The ability of the

research task to investigate the larger housing development located at 77 Hill Street

was hindered by the decision of its respective owners not to participate. In effect,

these two elements have restricted the capacity of the research task to demonstrate

a more comprehensive representation of residential development categories and

opinions from local developers in the area.

Whilst in-depth interviews are an ideal way for researching people with busy

lifestyles, it also provides an avenue for investigating personal, sensitive and

confidential information. As such, it should be made aware that there may be areas

of purposeful distortion in the responses obtained.

As the research study could have benefited additionally from a more comprehensive

sample size and access to additional facilities of verification and cross-checking, the

result of the in-depth interviews did provide the chance to concentrate on the

respondents’ individual experiences and understand the lessons they offer. Overall,

41

the research approach was successful in obtaining sufficient and valuable

information from local developers.

4.5 Summary

The primary research approach and methods as discussed in the above sections

were successful in gathering the necessary information from local developers within

and around the Cabramatta area. Despite some initial setbacks and as a result of the

interview process, a range of perspectives were obtained for several categories of

residential developments. Despite the reluctance from local developers whom had

declined to take part, the general response from those who participated was very

forthcoming.

42

CHAPTER FIVE – RESEARCH FINDINGS

43

5. Research Findings

5.1 Overview

The purpose of this chapter is to document the findings gathered from the interviews.

The feedback collected from local developers has been presented under the context

of specific themes deemed relevant to the focus of this paper.

5.2 Themes

The findings derived from local developer interviews are presented below. To help

with data analysis, information relevant to purpose of this thesis has been structured

using a thematic type approach. These themes have been adopted as it provide an

ideal means of increasing the understanding of local developer experiences by

drawing critical connections to the current issues and highlight possible areas for

policy change.

The themes relating to profits and security, local ties, financing, development

approvals, market response and future development have been selected as they

effectively convey experiences relating to local developer motivations, project risks

encountered, development approach, construction and planning issues as well as

cost factors involved.

5.2.1 Profits and Security

Not surprisingly, profitability and the sense of enjoying ownership of a stable asset

were the major precursors for local developers to have become involved in property

development. Generally, they regard it to be a pretty straight forward and relatively

safe process which can return a sizable profit. Thi Lim in particular highlights this

point of view in stating that “despite some nervous times, building to make money is

quite often fun and exciting” (2009). Compared to other investments, of which he has

little knowledge of and is uncomfortable with due to the increased volatility, he finds

that “on top of increasing capital returns and ability to attract rent”...the tax

advantages are also pretty good” for property developers (T Lim 2009, pers. comm.,

44

28 Aug). “For people in the same situation, this is a great incentive to get developing”

(T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug).

The sense of security which property development brings to the local developers is

also expressed through in their remarks. Cliff La for one makes this perfectly clear by

stating that for him “it’s a good way of making money and benefiting from the added

security of this type of investment, it’s a good feeling knowing that you are holding

onto property” (2009). Wilson Chang also mimics this same belief, stating that his

decision to build the duplex allowed him “to obtain a good quality home to live in

whilst making money next door” (2009,). He adds, “the arrangement for the building

project has been convenient and at the end of the day, I can sleep easier at night

knowing that I can be on top of any problems which may occur” (W Chang 2009,

pers. comm., 12 Sept). Tieu Maung further reinforces these views by alerting to us

that other than the long term capital gains which she considers as the main

drawcard, getting into property has “granted the benefits of receiving a passive

stream of income in the form of rent” whilst her and her husband are away working

(2009). In addition to this, she regards it as a means of “safeguarding the future for

the life they want to live” (T N Maung 2009, pers. comm., 13 Sept).

5.2.2 Local Ties

Local developers revealed that their familiarity with the area had more or less shaped

their decision to undertake their respective projects in and around Cabramatta. For

some, this extended to the familiarity with council processes and connections to local

businesses. Consequently, local developers generally pointed out that this has in part

influenced their decision to build their projects within the locality as opposed to other

places. Tieu Maung’s illustrates this point of view in stating that “having lived in the

area for most of my life and... together with investment advice and guidance from her

family members”; she considers that it was “only of natural to seek development

opportunities within the area” (T N Maung 2009, pers. comm., 13 Sept).

Failing to adequately enter into a housing project in Epping and parts of the Inner

West, Cliff La stated that the locational choice for his development eventually turned

to “focus on opportunities within the local area” (2009). This was in part due to the

fact that he “knew it would be significantly cheaper to enter the market and also

45

because of the growth potential”, adding that “the availability of larger lots in the area

had specifically appealed to this decision as well” (C La 2009, pers. comm., 3 Sept).

Thi Lim attributes his past experience as a local real estate agent as one of the key

motivators for his decision to locate in Cabramatta (2009). He is quoted in saying

“that because of my experience in knowing what to expect from the market place and

with various connections to local lawyers, other real estate agents and developers

built up over the years, it was a logical choice to have undertaken the project here” (T

Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug). In addition to this, he admits that the development

would allow him to “have a quality home that is located close to family, friends and

work” (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug).

Like Thi Lim, the case for Wilson Chang and Developer X also relates to their family

commitments and connections in the local area. As Wilson Change puts it, “I don’t

really have any interest in other places, my job is based here, my children go to

school here, and I enjoy the community and the shopping as well” (W Chang 2009,

pers. comm., 12 Sept). Developer X mentions that because his family members had

also undertaken separate projects in the area “it just seemed like the obvious location

to undertake the project” having admitted to “have always thought and aspired to the

development prospects for land in this area” (2009). In addition to this, he believes

that his "knowledge about the construction industry coupled with his brothers’ and in-

laws’ experience and association to local businesses...had benefited the whole

project and added that “it would have been a bit more difficult to built the project

anywhere else” (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug). It is learnt that Developer

X is also well versed in the local council’s processes and has a very familiar

understanding of their expectations regarding housing development for the area

(2009). This in turn placed him in a predisposed position to conduct his activities

within the area.

5.2.3 Financing

Financing was a very important point of discussion amongst the local developers.

Most financing was found to be sourced from the banks with the remaining proportion

of private funds put together in various ways. The latter is found to reflect the nature

in how the development project was carried out. What can be said is that the local

46

developers were found to be in financially sound positions prior to undertaking their

projects. We find from the responses that most of the loans were serviced by a

secondary source, being either a job, support from another partner or an outside

business. Generally, the financial state of the projects encountered little or no

complications with all avoiding any potential on defaulting.

Wilson Chang provides an insight into his financial situation to help understand this

better; as in his development he “was matched to a mortgage facility designed for the

particular situation” whereby the private proportion of credit came in the form of

“savings and personal assets” held (2009). He states that this was because he had

“been taught to save as much cash as possible before any consideration of an

investment can be made” (W Chang 2009, pers. comm., 12 Sept). In his experience,

“when you are able to get into that position, more people are willing to deal with you

and you can get things done generally more effectively; it can be frustrating and slow

but it is worth it; in the end I am able to enjoy reasonable repayments because of this

strategy” (W Chang 2009, pers. comm., 12 Sept).

Cliff La’s residential development undertaking was only made possible by forming a

partnership with his brother (2009). He mentions that on his own, “it would have been

a lot harder to source finance from the banks to help fund the project and also

benefited from halving any of the projects risks” (C La 2009, pers. comm., 3 Sept).

This also mentions that the “burden of repayments was also softened” (C La 2009,

pers. comm., 3 Sept). Currently, he indicates, “the loan is still being paid off with

parts of their income and rent received from the new house” (C La 2009, pers.

comm., 3 Sept). “Generally because the cost for that particular project was relatively

high, there will be a period of consolidation to existing funds before other projects in

the pipeline can be commenced” (C La 2009, pers. comm., 3 Sept).

For Thi Lim and his knock-down rebuild project, he states that “having the family

business definitely helped create an added advantage to access finance for the

project” (2009). He asserts that having “the extra backing of a job and the restaurant

has eased the strain on the repayments...providing the extra flexibility of including

more features for the house” (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug). He also

acknowledges that his position is more privileged than others and admits that “the

47

project would not have likely to have been started if that had not been the case” (T

Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug).

Tieu Maung disclosed that financing for her duplex development came in the form of

the “first home owners grant together with combined savings” from both her and her

husband (2009). She mentioned that “the bank also took into consideration income

levels and was eventually convinced to help finance the project” (T N Maung 2009,

pers. comm., 13 Sept). Before the project began, they “stayed in the house for six

months to satisfy requirements for the first home owners grant and continued on with

the commencement of the project” (T N Maung 2009, pers. comm., 13 Sept). They

subsequently managed to sell one side whilst holding on to the other as a rental

property (T N Maung 2009, pers. comm., 13 Sept). This strategy has “helped free up

much needed capital and eased some of the financial strains” they were experiencing

at the time (T N Maung 2009, pers. comm., 13 Sept).

Developer X helps provide some further insight for development financing for higher

density projects. He indicates that “prior to the townhouse development he had been

buying property independently for some time” and that the townhouse development

came about “by getting into a consortium with my brothers” whom also were heavily

invested into other property themselves (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug).

Developer X sees this as a really crucial factor for the development as it meant that

they “could muster a significant sum of cash together and use the combined personal

assets as a further guarantee to financiers” (2009). He advises that this provided an

effective way to gain leverage and get into property development; “I don’t think the

project would have happened without this” (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug).

By the same token, he considers it to be “highly risky and dangerous” explaining that

he had no protection on his personal assets (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31

Aug).

Developer X had indicated that finance was a very delicate stage in “which everyone

needed to know what they were going to get out of project” (2009). He admits “it was

tricky working alongside family members as many things can go out of hand”

(Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug). In this particular stage, the process was

carried on with extra diligence taking “approximately five months for the financing

48

agreements to be finalised” (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug). “The loan was

serviced with personal incomes and investment vehicles from all parties during the

entire process...upon the eventual sale of all the units in the townhouse development

was paid off in full” (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug).

5.2.4 Development and Approvals Process

There were also various approaches to the development process and approvals

application undertaken for each local development project. In part, the differences in

these approaches are seemingly reflective of the experience of each local developer.

More importantly, it reveals particular practices which may prove crucial to the

successful rollout of future housing developments in the area.

For both the duplex developments, Tieu Maung and Wilson Chang indicated that

they both purchased different home packages as advertised by some building

companies (2009). Having already purchased the land, Tieu Maung describes that

they “engaged Masterton homes for their duplex development, to be responsible for

all parts of the development and approvals work” (2009). After having picked out their

design, fittings and materials, she mentioned that the company proceeded with

submitting the relevant subdivision plans, development application

lodgement...construction and landscaping of the dwelling (T N Maung 2009, pers.

comm., 13 Sept). In hindsight, Tieu Maung believes that “although the company had

got the job done and provided assistance throughout most stages of

development...the end cost of the whole project worked out to be quite expensive

and the quality of the workmanship did not live up to the imagination” (2009). Upon

post construction inspections, she had “found many defects and imperfection with

materials and detail in the work” (T N Maung 2009, pers. comm., 13 Sept). Tieu

Maung stressed that perhaps the most difficult part of the project entailed “seeking

agreements with neighbouring properties for the creation of a drainage easement” of

which she and her husband pursued themselves; this was in addition to the fact that

“the whole project was significantly long...lasting approximately about two years to

complete” (2009).

In contrast, Wilson Chang had engaged Lily Homes for his duplex development

(2009). Like the case of Tieu Maung, the whole project was predominately delivered

49

by the company. He recounts that it was a ‘smooth and easy process with the

company providing guidance through the approvals and building phases” (W Chang

2009, pers. comm., 12 Sept). In terms of pricing, he agreed that he had spent more

than he initially wanted to, “having added many extras...partly due to slight delays”,

but was satisfied with the product delivered (W Chang 2009, pers. comm., 12 Sept).

Unlike Tieu Maung, Wilson noted that the project took approximately sixteen months

to complete (W Chang 2009, pers. comm., 12 Sept).

Other owner occupiers had decided to proceed with other approaches. Cliff La had

revealed that he was “not in charge of the development and approvals process”

(2009). Previous arrangements meant “that the tasks were overseen by a project

manager”; commissioned by his brother to assume the majority of responsibilities for

the entire project (C La 2009, pers. comm., 3 Sept). Unlike Masterton and Lily

Homes, the project manager was “briefed on the design outcomes as well as the

budget”. The project manager proceeded to undertake the project by “selecting and

contracting the architect, planners and builders suitable for the project” (C La 2009,

pers. comm., 3 Sept). Stages vital to the development were noted down as “the

subdivision of land, creation of an easement to access new lot located towards the

back...and the design and planning approvals for both the existing and new houses”

whereby the respective tasks were delegated to the responsible contractors (C La

2009, pers. comm., 3 Sept). With regular briefings for each stage, Cliff and his

brother were “kept updated with the progress of the project and any potential

setbacks” which may have occurred (C La 2009, pers. comm., 3 Sept). He

acknowledges that he was “disappointed in settling with the subdivision pattern”,

which was initially “meant to be subdivided into three other separate lots not two”, the

final design was reached on the basis of council recommendations (C La 2009, pers.

comm., 3 Sept). Despite this, he felt that the whole process was a relative success (C

La 2009, pers. comm., 3 Sept).

For Thi Lim and townhouse builder Developer X, the outfit used for their development

and approvals process also varied slightly to other local developers. Thi Lim

personally drove the project himself primarily “to ensure control of all elements of the

redevelopment and save on costs” (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug). The tasks he

oversaw included the “costing, design, planning and construction...contracting out

50

tasks to individuals and local companies” (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug). He

regards the whole process to be generally successful, attributing it to the “skills and

cooperation from each member of the team and because it was relatively small scale

by nature” (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug). Outcomes in the design and planning

phases were characterised by council’s concerns about the built form of the

development and “how it did not relate to the designs of existing dwellings around the

land” (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug). Revisions to the design ensured that the

development was approved (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug).

For Developer X and his consortium, after having reached initial agreements

between parties involved, “the project continued to investigate potential sites capable

of supporting a townhouse development” (2009) . Consequently, they were able to

piece together “three pieces of land adjoining one another to create a total area of

approximately 1800 square metres” (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug). They

proceeded on to the design and planning phases whereby initial designs were found

to be not entirely satisfactory and were subsequently revised and worked through

with council officers (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug). Developer X outlines

that “the main issue was related to the prescribed floor space ratios” in which he and

his team had proposed a design solution which made way for a slight increase

(2009). The problem was eventually settled with changes to the developments layout

and design, effectively meeting the council’s floor space requirements (Developer X

2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug). In terms of construction, Developer X notes that they

were “able to save a significant amount of money because the project was able to

source materials and labour directly through personal work” (2009). In total the

project task lasted for just over 20 months to complete from inception right through to

delivering the units to the market (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug).

5.2.5 Market Response

Generally, market responses to local developer projects were said to be well

received. A general comparison of sales and rental outcomes of each particular

project does highlight some areas of contrast and may be useful in providing an

indication of the local market trends and capacity.

51

Cliff La stated that although there was a good level of interest for the new dwelling,

many potential buyers were concerned with the fact that it was situated towards to

back of the existing dwelling away from the street (2009). As a result of this and the

timing of placement onto the market, “there were few serious buyers... the offer

prices were below what was expected” and hence below what they were willing to

accept (C La 2009, pers. comm., 3 Sept). In turn, they “decided to rent out the

property instead... focusing on a sale later down the track (C La 2009, pers. comm., 3

Sept).

Tieu Maung notes that the sale and rental of the duplex development was well

received when put to the market, having pointed out that a buyer and a rental tenant

was “found within two and a half months from the time of listing” whereby “the sale of

one half of the duplex fell just below initial expectations” (2009). She estimates that in

hypothetical case of having to sell the other side, she would have achieved a

comfortable profit (T N Maung 2009, pers. comm., 13 Sept). For now, her “strategy is

to hold onto the remaining property of which is collecting above market rent” (T N

Maung 2009, pers. comm., 13 Sept).

Similar to Tieu Maung, Wilson Chang indicates that whilst he has been living on one

side of his duplex, he is “renting the other side out at an above market rate” (2009).

He justifies this rate by saying that “it is a new development with new facilities and

better environment” (W Chang 2009, pers. comm., 12 Sept). He believes that people

whom “are looking for a good quality home should be willing to pay a premium”,

simplifying later on that “it just makes financial and commercial sense” (W Chang

2009, pers. comm., 12 Sept). He also indicates that the rental listing was well

received, “taking approximately a month to place a tenant within the property” ((W

Chang 2009, pers. comm., 12 Sept).

Thi Lim points out that if he had the intention of selling his property, he would have

opted to “developed either a duplex or triplex development” (2009). He says that

“although most would fancy living in his house, it is too expensive for most people in

this area to consider purchasing” (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug). He adds that

“the redeveloped property would only attract people with large families which make

up a small proportion of the local residential market” (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28

52

Aug). From his real estate experience, he considers that “developers should pursue

medium density housing...from duplex through to townhouse developments...this

would be more appropriate for the local market and be easier to sell” (T Lim 2009,

pers. comm., 28 Aug). Developers whom “focus on apartment type living would face

high levels of risk and failure to appeal to the market in terms of pricing” (T Lim 2009,

pers. comm., 28 Aug). He believes that the ultimate solution for apartments would

need to entail “a successful combination of reasonable apartment prices, profits to

the developer and excellent building quality” (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug).

From his point of view, “this would fill the gap in the market but would very difficult to

deliver” (T Lim 2009, pers. comm., 28 Aug).

In Developer X’s circumstances, prior to completion of the project, their marketing

campaign involved “selling the properties off the plan to reduce the burden on

borrowed costs and risk” (2009). They “managed to sell the majority of the

townhouse units and experienced minor delays for the sale of 3 remaining units”.

Despite this and “having revised the unit prices... were able to sell the units over an

additional two and a half months” (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug). As the

project was Developer X’s first major housing development, he “believes the returns

made overall were fair...satisfied with the overall outcomes” (Developer X 2009, pers.

comm., 31 Aug). From the overall response, he considers that the successes they

were able to create from the project came in the form of “delivering the type of

housing people want to live in” (Developer X 2009, pers. comm., 31 Aug).

5.2.6 Future of Development

Although unsure about any potential future projects which they may roll out, the local

developers were optimistic about the future development for the area. Their

perceptions were founded generally on the basis of the changes they believe are

taking place in the area, their recent experiences and the redevelopment capabilities

of available land stocks.

Both Wilson Chang and Tieu Maung consider that the ambitions of the local people

and in particular, young couples wanting to take advantage of government grants,

together with the relatively lower price of real estate will produce continued demand

for home ownership in this area (2009). “The area provides the ideal conditions for

53

families to realise their dreams of living in a new and spacious home and for others to

get into the market” (Maung, 2009). Discounting locational factors such as exclusivity

and travel, “other places are just simply too expensive and not worth the money to

live in; for the average price of an apartment or terrace close to the city, you can buy

a decent sized house with much more space” (Chang, 2009). Wilson Chang adds

that this alone will make the place attractive for most people into the future (2009).

Cliff La, whom has noticed over the years a gradual increase in newer home

developments, believes “that people will eventually realise and take advantage of the

fact that the area has great opportunities for growth and improvement” (2009). Whilst

the area in general may not be as appealing to live in as opposed to other more

favourable parts in Sydney, future developments have much to benefit from the

existing rail facilities, commercial districts, open space and other public, private

services (C La 2009, pers. comm., 3 Sept). Cliff also believes that “there are great

opportunities to capitalise on run down fibro houses and walk up buildings...for walk

up buildings in particular, it makes sense to renovate and provide additional levels to

these buildings; the catch being to persuade council to change the planning

provisions and making sure that it is viable” (La, 2009).

In the views of Thi Lim and Developer X, the current capacity of land is under-utilised

and presents many opportunities for redevelopment (2009). Thi Lim speculates that

many people like him will continue to invest and build newer houses in the area

because it is very straight forward and accessible market (T Lim 2009, pers. comm.,

28 Aug). Developer X regards that the prospect of larger scale property projects

occurring into the future remains very promising and will be very beneficial for the

local area but imagines that the task would be very difficult to undertake (2009). From

experience, it is perceived that “the biggest barriers include raising enough funds for

the project, getting the cooperation of council to change planning

provisions...including increases floor space ratios and zoning” and “finding the ideal

location to build” (Developer X, 2009).

5.3 Summary

The results of this chapter have revealed detailed accounts of local developer

experiences in Cabramatta. Largely as a result of their circumstances, local

developers have been able to find capitalise in local development opportunities, often

54

through an orderly styles of approach. By their accounts, we see certain areas of

strengths and weaknesses, information which would greatly assist in determining

how policy intervention can better instigate larger scale renewal and consolidation in

the area.

The following chapter will provide an in-depth discussion of these findings in relation

to current issues as raised in Chapters 2 and 3 as well as providing

recommendations regarding future policy interventions.

55

CHAPTER SIX – RESEARCH EVALUATION

56

6. Research Evaluation

6.1 Overview

The research evaluation will attempt to interpret these findings in relation to the key

issues which have emerged as a result of the literature review and housing

background in Cabramatta. It will subsequently provide recommendations for the

development of best practice initiatives concerning the future of urban renewal and

consolidation in area.

6.2 Evaluation of Findings

Findings from the interviews have provided an in-depth understanding of the intricate

details pertaining to key themes emerging from local developer activities in the area.

For a start, it can be said that the neoliberal policies to housing has been an effective

tool in encouraging local developers to partake in providing new and additional

supplies of dwellings to the area – doing justice to those who have advanced the

benefits of urban entrepreneurism.

In the first instance, it is clear that current arrangements for local development

provide local developers opportunities to gain profit as well as to increase their

personal security. Although they were not prepared to reveal figures relating to this,

judging from the information provided and based on their future aspirations, it is fair

to say that these projects do offer a return great enough to make these project

undertakings worth it. In a way, this does dispel some of the allegations that housing

renewal and consolidation related projects for the area not feasible. This might

however, be the case for professional practices which leads one to think that perhaps

incorporating larger developers into the picture for long term renewal and

consolidation may not be the ideal solution; given the high margins and fees they

impose onto development projects.

In addition to this, it was also found that local developers have sought to a variety of

approaches for their projects. In most cases, their experience has shown that many

of the approaches were relatively straight forward and was done with relatively little

57

complications. This was further enhanced as it was made aware that all had in some

way leveraged the skills and resources of other parties in the local area. This ranged

from accessing services of professional builders, local businesses and utilising family

ties. It can be said that because of this feature, local development projects are

instilled with a high degree of flexibility and options which suit local developer

circumstances – an element which corporate bodies don’t have due to those policies

and bureaucratic structures that have been put in place effectively slowing them

down.

In a more critical sense, such features have been important attribute to the very

reason which has enabled low density developments, similar to those belonging to

the local developers interviewed, to take place in Cabramatta. Certainly, with the

current housing stock and lot configurations and infrastructure capacity this is would

be the obvious task to undertake as opposed for large scale higher density projects -

which carries a great deal of intricacy in negotiations, deal making and risk .The

combined effect of all this is confirmed with the fact that the majority of local

residential projects have been in the form of low density developments as was

revealed in findings derived from the local development audit included in Chapter 3.

Whilst they do not represent the ideal solution to densification outcomes, new

developments have generally contributed positively to the urban landscape and

building performance. This has been beneficial in terms of improving the liveability to

suit contemporary lifestyles as well as improving quality of the urban environment as

a whole. At this stage, housing and rental affordability have not been too much of an

issue as local developer experiences indicated that they are meeting current market

capacity.

Circumstantially though, in view of growing concerns relating to affordability, growth

and the deteriorating state of housing, current local developments may be a of

additional impetus for future development issues. Where there are already limited

capacities for high density developments to take place, by development pace and

land opportunities, it seems that the long term consequences of these low density

projects may further impact larger scale renewal and consolidation prospects by way

of complicating the processes of site assembly, escalate the price of land and hence

58

affect any profitability of housing projects, increase resource consumption by way of

destroying good quality developments and most importantly render high density

developments incompatible with those land uses.

Consequently, it is by the absence of detailed policy, effective governance structures

and public funding then that Ruming and others consider to current ad hoc style of

development will not effectively satisfy the broader social, economic and

environmental concerns (2007). In light of this, it is logical then to introduce direct

forms of government intervention to address the renewal and consolidation problems

in Cabramatta. For local developers this would produce more positive outcomes in

terms of realising greater development outcomes and profits. Whilst it would be a

source of increased competition, it would provide greater incentives for them to

continue developing within the area.

6.3 Best Practice Recommendations

The findings obtained from local developers have provided some ideas in forming

best practice solutions which can better address urban renewal and consolidation

issues in Cabramatta. Because the state and the local governments would most

likely be responsible for initiating such an approach, these ideas pay particular focus

to their roles as well as their interactions with other private entities.

The first of these ideas looks to the prospect of incorporating public-private

partnerships as an alternative solution to current development practices. This is a

crucial concept for housing development in Cabramatta as experiences in the US

have found, such partnerships have lead to improved coordination of resources as

well as policy outcomes (Nye & Glickman 2000, p 194-197). Establishing public-

private partnerships for future building developments would offer greater

opportunities for housing renewal and development to overcome existing

impediments and concerns as examined throughout the literature. As Bratt has

identified, such partnerships may be modelled of combinations incorporating the

participation of the public sector through local housing authorities, the private for-

profit sector, and non-profit organisations (2008). In the context of Cabramatta, this

would likely require the participation from bodies such as the Department of Housing,

Department of Planning, Fairfield City Council, various building groups and local

59

community co-operatives to name a few. The challenge this however, is to be as

clear as possible about how each type of developer can best play a role that would

lead to fruitful and mutually beneficial collaborations or partnerships (Bratt 2008).

As it stands, current arrangements are primarily one dimensional, mainly carried out

by many small scale developers for purposes of profit and security and are not

conducive in meeting effective long term housing needs and objectives for the area.

Partnership arrangements would ultimately create a better set up for parties to

negotiate, benefit from increased capabilities to draw from each other’s strengths and

at the same time counter their own weaknesses. As found in local developer

responses, the features which serve to justify and benefit local projects include

having connections to established business and building networks as well as an

understanding of community viewpoints. Arranging public-private partnerships would

allow the state and local government to gain access and benefit from these key

strengths, not to mention other experiences and skill sets in particular areas of the

development phase. In Developer X’s case for example, this might result in gaining

better knowledge of site assembly for the benefit of new larger scale projects. Other

potential scenarios for collaboration may also look to combine the existing design

and construction synergies of home builders such as Masterton and Lily Homes, as

commissioned by Tieu Maung and Wilson Chang. These bodies can offer efficient

access to a network of builders, materials sourcing, and expertise in design,

engineering and construction

In turn, what this means for interested development bodies, either professional or

local, is that they would gain vital support in areas which they may not be as efficient.

This may include improved guidance and efficient engagement to the planning

system and related processes. Risks to developers may also be reduced. In terms of

property acquisition and initial cash outlay, there is capacity for the state and local

government to supply, in exchange for low income housing, local land stocks which

may be available in their holdings or perhaps through compulsory acquisition powers.

As opposed to individual developers whom may undertake large scale projects on

alternative land located away from commercial zones, major road, rail and other

infrastructure facilities, such avenues of approach would provide better convenience

to the community and present more sustainable development through redeveloping

60

existing housing stocks and in particular of those notorious 3-4 storey walk up flat

buildings that are characteristic of the area. Together, these arrangements may also

result in significant cost savings incurred throughout the course of a project.

The notion of embracing public-private partnerships leads us to the second idea for

improving renewal and consolidation prospects for the local area– that is to create

greater funding options available to development entities. As we have learned from

local developer responses, financing for their respective projects was largely

obtained by leveraging off personal assets and income streams. This confirms the

broader trend that private-sector funding has been a dominant source of urban

regeneration finance with equity, provided by the developer, and debt being the

principal methods (Adair et al, 2003). Such financial arrangements have so far been

adequate in producing developments generally no greater than medium density type

housing and would prove very challenging and risky for developers wanting to

undertake anything greater. Even for Thi Lim and Developer X, who have relatively

strong financial capacities and are well equipped in undertaking medium sized

projects themselves, would experience difficulties in raising the required finance for

larger scale projects if they had intended to.

The solution is to improve what Begg terms as the “investability” of cities (2002), or

taken in this case to be Cabramatta. The state and local government should create,

in addition to available benefits, greater options for funding to generate bigger

incentives for developers to undertake such projects. As experiences in the UK have

shown, such mechanisms have been a primary instigator of regeneration

programmes, providing effective solutions in for renewal in particularly complex areas

(Tyler, 2001). These include providing various grant based mechanisms, gap funding

(Tyler, 2001) and arranging medium and long term capital (Urban Task Force, 1999)

for developers. Methods of incorporating programmes which allocate future increases

in property taxes from a designated area to pay for improvements within that specific

area, better known as tax incremental financing or TIFs have also been the option of

many municipalities in the US to facilitate the infrastructure improvements which

accompanying renewal and consolidation efforts (Dye & Merriman, 1999, Ratcliffe et

al., 1999 sourced in Adair et al 2003)

61

Depending on the nature of how the state, local council and development entities are

engaged, funding options for renewal and consolidation in Cabramatta may include,

but not limited to establishing redevelopment trusts, low interest loan packages,

staged cash injections, remodelling developer contribution payments and or special

tax treatments to encourage developers to undertake land regeneration for low

income housing. For larger institutional developers, this would mean greater

capacities for them to alleviate some of the perceived risks which are currently

keeping them away from any involvement in regeneration and consolidation projects

in the area.

Emerging from the research, the third proposal to improve renewal and consolidation

in Cabramatta is the need to update current planning provisions to better support

new higher density outcomes. As well as better aligning state directions as

prescribed in the Metropolitan and West Central subregional strategies, changes to

planning controls would ultimately prepare the right foundation and capacity for

renewal and higher density housing. This would in turn create more certainty to

development entities and to the market. From local developer experiences, example

issues which proved to be troublesome to their development aspirations were found

to be in the areas relating to floor space ratios, building design and subdivision

patterns. Although we may not know the complete justifications of council decisions

regarding these points of conflicts at the time of local developer projects, it does

highlight that current controls, weather appropriate or not, may in fact be deterring

the prospects of renewed or higher density developments from taking place. In

review of the provisions in Fairfield City Council’s Local Environmental Plan (LEP)

1994, few elements were found to adequately provide opportunities for the delivery of

higher density housing within Cabramatta. This is particularly so for land situated

close to the commercial centre and railway station. Some elements were found to

support opportunities for ample redevelopment and renovation projects, but not on

any major scale. The major point of the whole problem is that developers are left

directionless. Without this direction, it has left a greater tendency for building

development to occur in an uncoordinated fashion that does not properly relate to

existing facilities.

62

Some initial revisions to existing planning provisions may look to incorporate changes

to floor space ratios, increasing limits to built form and re-examining current zoning

allowances. Implementing such changes would ensure that future housing

developments have the flexibility to supply an increased number of dwellings per

development, take up less land and instigate increased housing diversity available to

the community. Further updates to design provisions would additionally ensure that

development would be carried out in manner that is reasonable and responds

appropriately to the desired future character of the local area. Of course, this would

be prepared in tandem with input from the community. In addition to these changes,

council may also consider developing specific guidance material for existing flat

buildings and townhouses as to generate greater capacity for renovation projects.

The most important of all changes would need to be the adoption of quadruple

bottom line requirements to ensure that future developments are financially and

economically viable, meet social goals and amongst other things, have concern for

the social and economic needs of the residents living in the housing (Bratt 2008).

Moreover, additional benefits may come in the form of creating specialised

regeneration zones or site specific master plans to house the changes existing

provisions. According to Bell, the method focuses on devising a document, or series

of documents, explaining the development proposals for an area by including a

strategy for the area, designs and implementation details (2005, p 85). Through this

place-based approach, the local council or housing authority may specify the desired

changes which can apply to relatively wide areas or perhaps, subject to detailed land

audits and investigations, to a series of key individual sites (Bell 2005, p 85). This

method of approach would ultimately place greater control with public authorities,

installing into development initiatives a high degree of co-ordination and

sophistication which might otherwise be lacking and thus mitigating the prospects of

rampant building development from taking place.

The ideas conveyed above will be crucial in forming best practice solutions to help

produce better outcomes for housing renewal and consolidation. As initiators of

future housing, the state and the local council must, before anything else re-evaluate

their current positions to housing development in the area and revise engagement

patterns to market participants. To proceed down the line with the same ad hoc

63

planning mentality and by continuing to promote greater stocks in private housing

developments as witnessed in previous sections, the future of housing in Cabramatta

is destined for failure. Although the recommendations may have been presented

separately, it is hoped that the state and council would look to combine them,

together with other outside measures, to produce a comprehensive approach for the

future of housing in Cabramatta.

6.4 Summary

We have observed that current local development practices have contributed to

renewal and consolidation outcomes in Cabramatta. Such forms of development

however, are unlikely to address the growing concerns of growth, urban decay and

housing affordability. If anything, they are perhaps more an obstacle to renewal and

consolidation prospects in the area.

Given the current housing development processes in Cabramatta, not to mention the

legal controls that govern them, developers are unlikely to fully bring about large

scale urban regeneration, which the area is in so much need of, together with

consolidation outcomes as proposed by the New South Wales Government. Those

mechanisms of best practice for future renewal and consolidation initiatives which

have been suggested offer an ideal solution to achieve this.

64

CHAPTER SEVEN – RESEARCH FINDINGS

65

7. Conclusion

7.1 Overview

The purpose of this chapter is to conclude the thesis by consolidating the information

and findings presented in the previous chapters. It will begin with a summation of the

research outcomes as well as the key recommendations concerning the future

development of urban renewal and consolidation policies in Cabramatta. Based on

these findings, a reflection on planning implications for the subregion as well as

suggestions for future research is included.

7.2 Research Outcomes

The research objective of this thesis has been to understand how best to renew and

consolidate the suburb of Cabramatta without adversely affecting current living

conditions and the general community. Given the location and existing context of the

area, investigations into local development projects have provided an ideal case

study to distil broad lessons of approach to better inform future renewal and

consolidation initiatives for not just Cabramatta but also for the broader area of the

West Central subregion.

The literature review concerning the key themes of urban renewal and urban

consolidation has also enabled greater perspectives on matters relating to

sustainability of development, governance and their impacts on the form and function

of low income communities and neighbourhoods. This has been specifically explored

through domestic and international experiences as outlined in Chapter 2.

In addition to this, by identifying the policies which has governed housing

development in Cabramatta, we have also been able to understand more thoroughly

the role of the state and local government in connection to the supply of housing in

low income areas as well as their relationship to housing providers and the

community at large. Transitions in housing policy in the past have illustrated a

general retraction of government based projects for the provision of low income

housing. Instead, its responsibilities have effectively become placed in the hands of

66

private developers and left to decisions of market. Where this approach may have

relieved housing problems in the past, it is no longer relevant to the context of today

and as such must be redesigned to better deal with current dilemmas relating to

physical deterioration, supply, affordability, the potential for displacement, funding

and other difficulties in the development process. Given the paradoxical nature of

current arrangements, government decisions in relation to housing in Cabramatta is

now more crucial than ever before. This was all highlighted throughout Chapter 3.

The design of the investigations into local developer experiences has provided

crucial insight in understanding the current strengths and limitations of property-led

local development practices taking place in a low income neighbourhood. Details

regarding the research together with an illustration of local developer profiles and

descriptions of their development projects have all been provided within Chapter 4.

Subsequent findings which focus on local developer decisions, choices in

development vehicles, funding arrangements and project outcomes have generated

a vital point of discussion in relation to forming best practice solutions for future urban

renewal and consolidation initiatives for Cabramatta. This is presented in Chapter 5

alongside the recommended changes needed in current initiatives.

Overall, the outcomes arising from the thesis has addressed those objectives and

questions which were set out prior to the commencement of the research. In doing

so, it has highlighted some of the mechanisms which would benefit efforts to renewal

and consolidate the suburb of Cabramatta.

7.3 Summary of Recommendations

The recommendations provided as part of the discussion of findings derived from this

research study focus primarily on the role of state and local government and their

relationship to development bodies and the community.

Public-private partnerships

The state and or local government should exploit the opportunities to work with

housing providers and local community operatives to instigate renewal and

67

consolidation projects within area. Current circumstances cannot attract the attention

of professional developers and so the majority of housing projects are mainly carried

out by many small scale developers for purposes of personal profit and security.

Unless partnership schemes are not implemented, development in the area is likely

to remain inefficient in meeting effective long term housing needs and objectives for

the area

Government-based funding

More government based funding mechanisms should also be put in place in addition

to current options. As private funds make up a large proportion of property

development funding, developers are stand to gain substantially lower profits for the

risks associated. As such development opportunities will likely continue to suffer from

the paralysis of financial burdens associated with property development. On

conditions that development projects will result in affordable and innovative housing

solutions, a range of funding mechanisms exists to help alleviate this. They include

establishing redevelopment trusts, designing low interest loan packages, offer staged

cash injections, creation of tax incentives and revising developer contribution plans.

Update existing policy provisions

Future housing renewal and consolidation projects are subject to the limitations of

current planning provisions. Current provisions have effectively capped the potential

for developments which may offer ideal housing solutions to the area in terms of

design and capacity. Existing provisions need to be reviewed and updated

accordingly to allow and encourage appropriate housing developments to take place.

Initial revisions to existing planning provisions may look to incorporate revisions to

floor space ratios, increasing limits to built form and re-examining current zoning

allowances. Updates to design provisions would additionally ensure that

development would be carried out in manner that is reasonable and responds

appropriately to the desired future character of the local area. The state and council

should also look to implement bottom line requirements to force development

outcomes to be more financially and economically viable, have regard to community

aspirations and attend to current social concerns.

68

Develop place-based policies

To specifically exploit development opportunities in strategic areas and to extreme

pockets of decline, the state and local government should look to create specialised

regeneration zones or site specific master plans to house the changes existing

provisions. As well as providing guidance to the future of development, this line of

approach would place greater control for public authorities to tailor development

outcomes more appropriately to relate to current issues for the community and future

growth of the area. It is also acts as an ideal way to muster in and house those other

mechanisms which have been already suggested, effectively improving the quality of

co-ordination and sophistication involved in the development process and thus

mitigating the prospects of rampant building development from taking place.

7.4 Suggestions for Future Research

The large scope of issues which urban renewal and consolidation prospects face in

area stresses a need for greater studies to be undertaken. This thesis has provided

some of the mechanisms which are designed to mitigate certain areas of concern

only by primarily examining local developer contributions. As those mechanisms

themselves exist in many different variations and can be combined in innovative

ways, future research can look to provide thorough modeling of their individual

impacts.

As discussed before, the primary research was not without limitations. The research

could have covered a larger pool and a more extensive range of local residential

development projects. The refusal of the owner at 77 Hill Street makes a great

example to this. Even though the project was essentially more relevant to renewal

than to consolidation, it would have provided important insight into better ways of

reinvigorating and managing outdated walkup buildings. Further research into these

particular experiences also exists for future capacities.

In the specific context for improving renewal and consolidation for the wider areas of

the subregion, examinations into local developer experiences in other localities

69

modelled similar to the primary research of this thesis provides further opportunities

of investigations. The development context of other areas may prove to be

substantially different to that of Cabramatta and would information collected would

add to a comprehensive body of knowledge to inform broad policy implications

7.5 Final Remarks

From a strategic point of view, the West Central subregion remains as one of the

most crucial areas in Metropolitan Sydney which offer great opportunities to support

additional dwellings and to meet housing demands for future. There are now even

more incentives to do this as much of the housing in the area are nearing the end of

their physical and economic lifecycles.

As revealed in this thesis, increasing the scale of both the state and local

governments involvement in housing collaborations will be a crucial in achieving this

as well as delivering more sustainable outcomes for the community. Government

intervention through the form of development partnerships, financial leveraging and

policy and plan changes will been an effective means of ensuring that housing stays

affordable, development projects remain viable and housing quality is improved.

Though these mechanisms will benefit renewal and consolidation prospects, it should

be pointed out that many other options are also available for adoption. The key to this

task however is in the ability of the state and local government to incorporate such

mechanisms into a comprehensive strategy, one which pulls together the resources

and knowledge from various sources to better co-ordinate future development and

serve the interests of the community. This will undoubtedly impact on how

development takes place as well as providing a clear vision going forward.

70

BIBLIOGRAPHY

71

8.0 Bibliography

Adair, A., Berry, J. & McGreal. S (2003) “Financing Property's Contribution to Regeneration”. Urban Studies, 40(5-6), pp.1065-1080. Addie, J.-P.D. (2008) “The rhetoric and reality of urban policy in the neoliberal city: implications for social struggle in Over-the-Rhine, Cincinnati”, Environment & Planning A, 40(11) pp. 2674-2692. Australian Bureau of Statistics 2001, ‘Cabramatta (C) (Statistical Local Area), Basic Community Profile’, viewed 15 Aug 2009, < http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/ABSNavigation/prenav/ViewData?&action=404&documentproductno=SSC11371&documenttype=Details&tabname=Details&areacode=SSC11371&issue=2001&producttype=Community%20Profiles&&producttype=Community%20Profiles&javascript=true&textversion=false&navmapdisplayed=true&breadcrumb=LPD&#Basic%20Community%20Profile > Australian Bureau of Statistics 2006, ‘Cabramatta (C) (Statistical Local Area), Basic Community Profile’, viewed 15 Aug 2009, < http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/ABSNavigation/prenav/ViewData?&action=404&documentproductno=SSC11157&documenttype=Details&tabname=Details&areacode=SSC11157&issue=2006&producttype=Community%20Profiles&&producttype=Community%20Profiles&javascript=true&textversion=false&navmapdisplayed=true&breadcrumb=LPD&&collection=Census&period=2006&producttype=Community%20Profiles&#Basic%20Community%20Profile > Baker, M. (1999) “Intervention or interference? Central government involvement in the plan-making process in six English regions”, Town Planning Review, 70(1). Barber, A. and Hall, S. (2008) “Birmingham: whose urban renaissance? Regeneration as a response to economic restructuring”, Policy Studies 29(3), 281-92. Barrett, G.1996, The Transport Dimension in M. Jenks, E. Burton & K. Williams (eds), The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?, E & F N Spon, UK, pp. 148-156. Baum, S. (1997) “Sydney, Australia: A global city? Testing the social polarisation thesis”, Urban Studies, 34(11) pp. 1881-1903. Beer, A. (1999) “Housing investment and the private rental sector in Australia”, Urban Studies, 36(2), pp. 255–269. Beer, A., Kearins, B. & Pieters, H. (2007) “Housing affordability and planning in Australia”, Housing Studies, 22(1), pp. 11–24. Begg, I. (2002) “‘Investability’: the key to competitive regions and cities, policy review section”, Journal of Regional Studies, 36(2) pp. 187–200.

72

Bell, D. (2005) “The Emergence of Contemporary Masterplans: Property Markets and the Value of Urban Design”, Journal of Urban Design 10(1), pp. 81-110. Bratt, R.G. (2008) “Nonprofit and For-Profit Developers of Subsidized Rental Housing: Comparative Attributes and Collaborative Opportunities”. Housing Policy Debate, 19(2) pp. 323-65. Breheny, M. (1995) “Compact cities and transport energy consumption”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 20 (1), pp. 81–101. Breheny, M.1996, Centrists, Decentrists and Compromisers: Views on the Future of Urban Form in M. Jenks, E. Burton & K. Williams (eds), The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?, E & F N Spon, UK, pp. 10-29. Brenner, M., Brown, J. & Canter, D. (1985) The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches, Academic Press, London. Brenner, N. and Theodore, N (2002) “Cities and the Geographies of "Actually Existing Neoliberalism"”. Antipode 34(3), 349-79. Bromley, R. D. F. and Thomas, C. J. (1993) “The retail revolution, the carless shopper and disadvantage”,Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers N. S., 18, pp. 222–236. Bunker, R. (2002) “In the shadow of the city: the fringe around the Australian metropolis in the 1950s”. Planning Perspectives, 17(1) pp. 61-82. Bunker, R., Gleeson, B. Holloway, D. and Randolph, B. (2002) “The Local Impacts of Urban Consolidation in Sydney”, Urban Policy and Research, 20 (2), 143-167. Bunker, R., Holloway, D. and Randolph, B (2005) “Building the Connection Between Housing Needs and Metropolitan Planning in Sydney, Australia”, Housing Studies, 20(5) pp. 771-94. Bunker, R., Holloway D. & Randolph, B. (2005a) “The expansion of urban consolidation in Sydney: social impacts and implications”, Australian Planner, 42 (3), pp. 16-25. Burton, E. (2000) The Compact City: Just or Just Compact? A Preliminary Analysis. Urban Studies, 1969-2006. Cameron, S. and Doling. J (1994) “Housing neighbourhoods and urban regeneration. Urban Studies”, 31(7), pp. 1211-1223. Cardew, R. (1998) Corridors of Planning: Recollections of the Sydney Region Outline Plan Preparation. Proceedings from IPHS 20th Century Planning Experience Conference, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales 15-18 July, 89-94 Carley, M. (1991) “Business in urban regeneration partnerships: a case study of Birmingham, Local Economy”, 6, pp. 100-115.

73

Collie, M. (1990) “The case for urban consolidation”, Australian Planner, 28, pp. 26–33. Cook, N. and Ruming, K. (2008) “On the Fringe of Neoliberalism: residential development in outer suburban Sydney”, Australian Geographer 39(2) pp. 211 - 228. Dalton, T. (1999). Making housing policy in Australia: Home ownership and the disengagement of the state. PhD thesis. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Melbourne. Dawkins, C.J.and Nelson, A.C., (2002) “Urban containment policies and housing prices: an international comparison with implications for future research”, Land Use Policy 19(1) pp. 1-12. Digaetano, A. and Klemanski, J. S. (1993) “Urban regime capacity: a comparison of Birmingham, England, and Detroit, Michigan”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(4), pp. 367-384. Department of Environment, Housing and Community Development 1978, A report on the consultations of the urban renewal task force of the department of environment, housing and community development, AGPS, Canberra Dye, R. F. and Merriman, D. F. (1999) “Popular financing tool hurts”, Engineering News Record, 243(4), p. 123. Easthope, H. and Randolph, B. (2009) “Governing the Compact City: The Challenges of Apartment Living in Sydney, Australia”. Housing Studies 24(2), pp. 243-59. Fairfield City Council (1994) Local Environmental Plan 1994, Fairfield City Council, Sydney. Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K., Mayer, H., Miller, K. T. Solitare, L., (2001) “Brownfield redevelopment as a smart growth option in the United States”, The Environmentalist, 21(2), pp. 129-143. Gurran, N (2008) “Affordable Housing: A Dilemma for Metropolitan Planning?”, Urban Policy and Research, 26(1), pp.101 -110 Ha, S. K. (2007) “Housing regeneration and building sustainable low-income communities in Korea”, Habitat International 31(1), 116-29. Hackworth, J. (2003) “Public housing and the rescaling of regulation in the USA”, Environment & Planning A, 35(3) pp. 531. Han, S. and O’Connor, K. (2008) “Urban consolidation and house prices: a case study of Melbourne 1990-2004”, GeoJournal, 73(4) 285-295.

74

Hopkins, L.D., Xu, X. & Knaap G.J. (2004) “Economies of scale in wastewater treatment and planning for urban growth”, Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 31(6) pp. 879-93. Holliday, S. (2000) “The higher density debate”, New Planner, 42, pp. 6–15. Ingram, G.K. (1998) “Patterns of Metropolitan Development: What Have We Learned?”, Urban Studies, 35(7) pp. 1019-1035. Kendig H (1979) New Life for Old Suburbs. George Allen & Unwin, Sydney. Jensen P. R. (2006) Housing Strategies for Sydney: Basic Considerations, Seminar for the Australian Institute of Urban Studies Jones, P. and Evans, J (2006) “Urban regeneration, governance and the state: Exploring notions of distance and proximity”, Urban Studies, 43(9) pp. 1491-1509. Lawless, P. (1994) “Partnership in urban regeneration in the UK: The Sheffield Central Area Study”, Urban Studies, 31(8) pp. 1303. Loftman, P. and Nevin, B. (1992) Urban regeneration and social equity: a case study of Birmingham 1986-1992. Faculty of the Built Environment Research Paper No. 8. University of Central England in Birmingham. Meyer B (2005) Future Sydney – A City of Cities. E-Proceedings of ‘Post-Suburban Sydney: The City in Transformation’ Conference, Parramatta, Sydney, New South Wales 22-23 November, 1-17 Milligan, V. R. and Dieleman, F. M. & Kempen, R. van (2006) “Impacts of contrasting housing policies on low-income households in Australian and the Netherlands” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(3) pp. 237-255. Milligan, V. R. (2003). How different? Comparing housing policies and housing affordability consequences for low-income households in Australia and the Netherlands. Nederlandse Geografische Studies 318. Utrecht University. Moran, A., 2006, The tragedy of planning: losing the great Australian dream, Pinnacle Print Group, Thornbury. New South Wales Department of Planning (2005) City of Cities: a Plan for Sydney’s Future, Department of Planning, Sydney. NSW Department of Environment and Planning (1984) Planning Issues in the Sydney Region: Urban Consolidation, Department of Environment and Planning, Sydney. Nye, N. and Glickman N. J. (2000). "Working Together: Building Capacity for Community Development." Housing Policy Debate 11(1): pp. 163-98.

75

Pugh, C. (1976). Intergovernmental relations and the development of Australian housing policies. Research Monograph no. 15. Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations. Canberra: Australian National University. Randolph, B. & Holloway, D. (2005) “A Social Profile of Households in High Density Housing in Fairfield”, City Futures Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney. Randolph, B. (2006) Urban Renewal: a new role for new housing providers in creating sustainable communities?, City Futures Research Centre Issues Paper, University of New South Wales, Sydney. Randolph, B. (2006a) “Delivering the compact city in Australia: current trends and future implications”, Urban Policy and Research, 24(4), pp. 473–490. Randolph, B. (2008) Socially Inclusive Urban Renewal in Low Value Suburbs: A Synopsis of Issues and an Agenda for Action?, City Futures Research Centre Issues Paper No. 6, University of New South Wales, Sydney. Ratcliffe, J., Williams, B. & Branagh, S. (1999) Managing and Financing Urban Regeneration. Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin Ruming, K., Randolph, B., Pinnegar, S. & Judd, B. (2007) ‘Delivering Sustainable Renewal in Australia’s Middle and Outer Suburbs: Council Reflections’. Proceedings of the 3rd State of Australian Cities Conference, University of South Australia Adelaide, November, 2007. Schall, L.D. (1976) “Urban Renewal Policy and Economic Efficiency”, American Economic Review, 66(4) pp. 612-629. Scoffham, E and Vale, B..1996, How Compact is Sustainable—How Sustainable is Compact? in M. Jenks, E. Burton & K. Williams (eds), The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?, E & F N Spon, UK, pp. 56-62. Searle, G. (2003) The Limits to Urban Consolidation. Urban Frontiers Program Issues Paper No. 14, University of Western Sydney, Sydney. Searle, G. (2006) “Is the city of cities metropolitan strategy the answer for Sydney?, Urban Policy and Research”, 24(4), pp. 553–566. Searle, G. (2007) Sydney's urban consolidation experience: Power, politics and community. Urban Research Program Research Paper 12, Griffith University, Queensland. Shenjing, H. and W. Fulong (2009) “China's Emerging Neoliberal Urbanism: Perspectives from Urban Redevelopment”, Antipode, 41(2) pp. 282-304. Sherry, C. (2006) “Termination of strata schemes in New South Wales—proposals for reform”, Australian Property Law Journal, 13(3), pp. 227–239.

76

Smith, R. (2006) Housing Stock Transfer: Investing in Renewal as a Tool for Sustainable Regeneration. Housing Studies, 21(2), pp. 269-82. Smith, S (1997) Urban Consolidation: Current Developments, New South Wales Parliamentary Library Service, Sydney. Smyth, H.1996, Running the Gauntlet: A Compact City within a Doughnut of Decay in M. Jenks, E. Burton & K. Williams (eds), The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?, E & F N Spon, UK, pp. 87-97. Stretton, H. (1989) Ideas for Australian Cities (Sydney: Transit Australia). Taylor, M. A. P. and Newton, P. W. (1985) “Urban design and revitalization -- An Australian perspective”, Urban Ecology 9, pp. 1-23. Troy, P. 1996 The perils of urban consolidation Federation Press, Leichhardt, NSW. Troy, P. 1999 ‘Urban institutions’, in Troy, P. (ed.) Serving the city, Pluto Press, Sydney, pp. 1-12. Turok, I. (1992) “Property-led urban regeneration: panacea or placebo?”, Environment & Planning A, 24(3) pp. 361. Tyler, P. (2001) Turning our urban areas around: do area based initiatives work? A review of evidence base and lessons for future policy. Paper delivered at Belfast City Council seminar, Belfast. Urban Task Force (1999) Towards an Urban Renaissance. The Report of the Urban Task Force, Routledge, London Walter, M. 2006, Social Research Methods, South Melbourne, Oxford University Press, South Melbourne Yates, J.(2001) “The rhetoric and reality of housing choice: The role of urban consolidation”,Urban Policy and Research,19(4) pp. 491 – 527 YIN, R. (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, London Zhu, J. (1997) “The Effectiveness of Public Intervention in the Property Market”, Urban Studies, 34(4) pp. 627-646.

77

APPENDIX A APPROVED LOCAL DEVLEOPMENT APPLICATIONS

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 2:23:11PM11/03/2009

Officer: All Records

Proposal Type: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/01/2009 to 31/01/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

680.1/2006 Two Storey Dwelling 340,00012-14 Calmsley PL HORSLEY PARKWestminster Homes Pty Ltd0680/2006DA DA Determination - Surrendered23/01/2009

722.1/2007 Triplex 600,0009 Senior ST CANLEY VALEMrs M Anekthanasub0722/2007DA Approved - Delegated Authority05/01/2009

964.1/2007 Carpark 200,00052-68 Gloucester ST BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr P Gibson0964/2007DA Approved - Delegated Authority27/01/2009

164.1/2008 Dual Occupancy-Detached 365,000175 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr R Molluso0164/2008DA Approved - Delegated Authority22/01/2009

264.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 218,00041 Kiora ST CANLEY HEIGHTSG Truong0264/2008DA Approved - Delegated Authority09/01/2009

1297.1/2008 Aged Persons Housing 423,000110-112 Harris ST FAIRFIELDResitech Approved - Delegated Authority13/01/2009

1301.1/2008 Agriculture 28,00015-21 Brolen WAY CECIL PARKMr M Gauci Approved - Delegated Authority08/01/2009

1348.1/2008 Home Business-Beauty Salon 5,00029 Cutler RD LANSVALEMs THT Tran Approved - Delegated Authority14/01/2009

1397.1/2008 Home Business-Clothing 2,0006 Mittiamo ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr TL Huynh Approved - Delegated Authority28/01/2009

1398.1/2008 Industry 3,000169-173 Hume HWY CABRAMATTAPharmacell Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority13/01/2009

1420.1/2008 Education Establishment 2,100,00013 Harrington ST CABRAMATTA WESTNSW Department of Education & Training Approved - Delegated Authority14/01/2009

1430.1/2008 Refreshment Room 150,000231 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMr L Wong Approved - Delegated Authority29/01/2009

1431.1/2008 Home Business-Office 6,000151 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMrs KLT Pham Approved - Delegated Authority23/01/2009

1507.1/2008 Air Conditioning Unit 10,0006 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr SH Tain DA Determination - Withdrawn19/01/2009

1509.1/2008 Air Conditioning Unit 5,400101 High ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr RCH Lee DA Determination - Withdrawn29/01/2009

1567.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 275,60072 Dawson ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr DH Do Approved - Delegated Authority23/01/2009

1576.1/2008 Shop 170,000239 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMr J Bayeh Approved - Delegated Authority12/01/2009

1587.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 265,87529-35 Duff RD CECIL PARKMr RO Lindsay Approved - Delegated Authority05/01/2009

1615.1/2008 Outbuilding 9,80027 Coventry RD CABRAMATTASLM Carport Approved - Delegated Authority27/01/2009

1624.1/2008 Shop 60,00013-21 Rossetti ST WETHERILL PARKMrs R Santa Barbara Approved - Delegated Authority23/01/2009

1628.1/2008 Outbuilding 30,00016 Ferry RD LANSVALEMr P Damjanovic Approved - Delegated Authority08/01/2009

1642.1/2008 Industry 08/55 Newton RD WETHERILL PARKKelly Services Australia Approved - Delegated Authority02/01/2009

1657.1/2008 Air Conditioning Unit 2,00023 Barton ST SMITHFIELDMr M Coletta Approved - Delegated Authority27/01/2009

1659.1/2008 Granny Flat 55,00018 Van Dieman CRES FAIRFIELD WESTMr B Polic Approved - Delegated Authority09/01/2009

1662.1/2008 Air Conditioning Unit 10,0006 Macquarie ST FAIRFIELDMr S Wu Approved - Delegated Authority08/01/2009

1685.1/2008 Granny Flat 50,00026 James ST FAIRFIELD EASTMr B Adada Approved - Delegated Authority20/01/2009

1690.1/2008 Home Bus-Acupuncture/Massage/Chiro 1,000195 Gladstone ST CABRAMATTAMr JY Wu Approved - Delegated Authority13/01/2009

1707.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 217,09511 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMr TS Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority09/01/2009

1708.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 292,0896A Charles ST SMITHFIELDEden Brae Homes Approved - Delegated Authority22/01/2009

1723.1/2008 Inground Pool 8,00021 Alamein RD BOSSLEY PARKMr AJ Griffiths Approved - Delegated Authority28/01/2009

1727.1/2008 Community Facility 250,000673-683 Smithfield RD EDENSOR PARKMr J Haskal Approved - Delegated Authority09/01/2009

1729.1/2008 Outbuilding 7,000244 Edensor RD EDENSOR PARKMr A J Gallagher Approved - Delegated Authority16/01/2009

Page 1 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 2:23:55PM11/03/2009

Officer: All Records

Proposal Type: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/01/2009 to 31/01/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

1748.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 171,69755 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMr B Kumar DA Determination - Withdrawn19/01/2009

1753.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 33,00029 Cheyenne RD GREENFIELD PARKMr G Alagha Approved - Delegated Authority08/01/2009

1759.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 200,00015 Stivala PL BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMrs Z Prlic Approved - Delegated Authority02/01/2009

1760.1/2008 Health Consulting Room/s 35,0002/13 William ST FAIRFIELDPolpan Pty Ltd & Jugail NO 8 P/T Approved - Delegated Authority23/01/2009

1761.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 30,000301 Brenan ST SMITHFIELDS Ayyoub Architects & Engineers Refused - Delegated Authority13/01/2009

1764.1/2008 Warehouse 10,0001054 Canley Vale RD WETHERILL PARKBac Design Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority08/01/2009

1765.1/2008 Industry 02A Robert ST SMITHFIELDSydney Tools Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority12/01/2009

1787.1/2008 Outbuilding 10,00034 Vidal ST WETHERILL PARKExcelfit Approved - Delegated Authority30/01/2009

1793.1/2008 Industry 03/33 Victoria ST SMITHFIELDAward Chemicals Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority05/01/2009

1807.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 260,000268 Edensor RD EDENSOR PARKUnited Design & Constructions Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority08/01/2009

1825.1/2008 Club 200,00014 Anzac AVE FAIRFIELDGlobal Projects NSW Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority20/01/2009

1827.1/2008 Refreshment Room 50,0005/47 Park RD CABRAMATTAMr K W Wu Approved - Delegated Authority12/01/2009

1830.1/2008 Outbuilding 14,0005 Tobruk PL BOSSLEY PARKWizard Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority29/01/2009

1833.1/2008 Shop 20,000102 John ST CABRAMATTALink Studio Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority08/01/2009

1834.1/2008 Shop 20,000102 John ST CABRAMATTALink Studio Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority09/01/2009

1835.1/2008 Shop 20,0007/47 Park RD CABRAMATTAMr T Hong Approved - Delegated Authority28/01/2009

1837.1/2008 Shop 4,0004/6 Villawood PL VILLAWOODMr N V Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority23/01/2009

1839.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 35,00059 Townview RD MT PRITCHARDMr DM Calabro Approved - Delegated Authority08/01/2009

1865.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 100,00075 Oliphant ST MT PRITCHARDS Ayyoub Architects & Engineers Approved - Delegated Authority20/01/2009

1867.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 220,00099 Nelson ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr M Tomac Approved - Delegated Authority27/01/2009

1873.1/2008 Industry 10,0006/11 Potter CL WETHERILL PARKL & T Filters Productions Approved - Delegated Authority05/01/2009

1874.1/2008 Shop 1,00029 John ST CABRAMATTAMiss T L Dinh Approved - Delegated Authority13/01/2009

1878.1/2008 Outbuilding 40,0009 Hercules ST FAIRFIELD EASTMr M Yau Approved - Delegated Authority21/01/2009

1879.1/2008 Outbuilding 8,000159 Sweethaven RD BOSSLEY PARKMrs S Le DA Determination - Withdrawn19/01/2009

1880.1/2008 Granny Flat 50,000283 North Liverpool RD BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMerkorious Construction Pty Limited Refused - Delegated Authority29/01/2009

1883.1/2008 Outbuilding 22,000121 Thorney RD FAIRFIELD WESTMr M Banic Approved - Delegated Authority23/01/2009

1884.1/2008 Industry 018 Rennie ST WETHERILL PARKMrs K Davies Approved - Delegated Authority02/01/2009

1890.1/2008 Granny Flat 50,000128 Orchardleigh ST OLD GUILDFORDMr B Al Reziq Refused - Delegated Authority27/01/2009

1891.1/2008 Land Fill 7,000112 Sweethaven RD GREENFIELD PARKMrs TVH Vu Approved - Delegated Authority28/01/2009

1892.1/2008 Medical Centre 42,7501/30 Nelson ST FAIRFIELDMr A Youhanna Approved - Delegated Authority27/01/2009

1895.1/2008 Shop 07/4 Station ST FAIRFIELDMr N Markovic Approved - Delegated Authority12/01/2009

1899.1/2008 Sign/s 2,0001788 The Horsley DR HORSLEY PARKMr M Zammit Approved - Delegated Authority23/01/2009

Page 2 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 2:23:55PM11/03/2009

Officer: All Records

Proposal Type: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/01/2009 to 31/01/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

1908.1/2008 Outbuilding 10,80071 Lily ST WETHERILL PARKMr T T Zgiar Approved - Delegated Authority02/01/2009

1911.1/2008 Home Business-Hairdressing 019 Jasnar ST GREENFIELD PARKMrs N Tendera Approved - Delegated Authority12/01/2009

1918.1/2008 Office Fitout 4,00070 John ST CABRAMATTATVL Domestic Architecture Designers Approved - Delegated Authority19/01/2009

1925.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 60,00019 Adelong CL WAKELEYMr QB Ho Approved - Delegated Authority15/01/2009

1929.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 256,23138 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMs T D Tran Approved - Delegated Authority23/01/2009

1945.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 200,00023 Beckenham ST CANLEY VALEMr V H Chau Approved - Delegated Authority20/01/2009

1950.1/2008 Office Fitout 215,00049-61 Spencer ST FAIRFIELDDepartment of Ageing,Disability & Home Care Approved - Delegated Authority06/01/2009

1954.1/2008 Medical Centre 15,0002 Hughes ST CABRAMATTAMr Q T Ha Approved - Delegated Authority27/01/2009

1955.1/2008 Outbuilding 3,5002 Cartela CRES SMITHFIELDMr H Le Approved - Delegated Authority20/01/2009

1960.1/2008 Subdivision Torrens 0105-113 Cowpasture RD WETHERILL PARKA & W Wholesalers Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority30/01/2009

1965.1/2008 Air Conditioning Unit 1,0005 Cowper PL WETHERILL PARKMrs V Jozic Approved - Delegated Authority13/01/2009

1972.1/2008 Outbuilding 8,0006 Citrine CL BOSSLEY PARKMr AF Creagh Approved - Delegated Authority08/01/2009

1983.1/2008 Outbuilding 6,90020 Kingfisher AVE BOSSLEY PARKWizard Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority30/01/2009

1986.1/2008 Outbuilding 11,0006 Bardia PL BOSSLEY PARKCraig's Mga Steel Buildings Approved - Delegated Authority30/01/2009

1987.1/2008 Granny Flat 25,00075 Belmore ST FAIRFIELD EASTMr Z Wehbeh Approved - Delegated Authority28/01/2009

1988.1/2008 Demolition 7,00052 Madeline ST FAIRFIELD WESTMr HM Tran Approved - Delegated Authority05/01/2009

4.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 18,00036 Bligh ST VILLAWOODMr TC Lam Approved - Delegated Authority28/01/2009

9.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 80,00053 Lawrence ST FAIRFIELDS Ayyoub Architects & Engineers Approved - Delegated Authority23/01/2009

13.1/2009 Demolition 5,0005 Marlborough ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr D Mitrovic Approved - Delegated Authority13/01/2009

15.1/2009 Demolition 8,000228 Ware ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr A Lu Approved - Delegated Authority12/01/2009

20.1/2009 Demolition 6,000228 Polding ST SMITHFIELDMr Z Hassan Approved - Delegated Authority13/01/2009

22.1/2009 Shop 11,6009/20-22 Hughes ST CABRAMATTAMr V D Huynh Approved - Delegated Authority15/01/2009

25.1/2009 Demolition 02 Throsby ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr G Haddad Approved - Delegated Authority14/01/2009

30.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 6,300101 High ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr RCH Lee Approved - Delegated Authority20/01/2009

31.1/2009 Shop 22,000561-583 Polding ST PRAIRIEWOODD - Vine Sweets Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority21/01/2009

32.1/2009 Fence 9,0006 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr C Lim Approved - Delegated Authority28/01/2009

33.1/2009 Outbuilding 10,0002 Rossiter ST SMITHFIELDMr U Morvillo Approved - Delegated Authority27/01/2009

35.1/2009 Refreshment Room 10,00030 Smithfield RD SMITHFIELDRichmond & Ross Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority20/01/2009

37.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,95098 Denison ST CARRAMARMrs A Casaol Approved - Delegated Authority20/01/2009

49.1/2009 Community Facility 064A Bareena ST CABRAMATTAFairfield City Council DA Determination - Withdrawn23/01/2009

63.1/2009 Shop 5,0003 Howatt ST VILLAWOODMrs H C Ma DA Determination - Withdrawn30/01/2009

Total Development Applications Applications: 95 Est. Cost: 8,842,587

Page 3 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 2:23:55PM11/03/2009

Officer: All Records

Proposal Type: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/01/2009 to 31/01/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

Est. Cost:Applications: 95GRAND TOTAL

8,842,587

Page 4 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:05:40AM11/03/2009

Officer: All Records

Proposal Type: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/02/2009 to 28/02/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

792.1/2006 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 55,00046 Alick ST CABRAMATTAMY Huong Trinh0792/2006DA DA Determination - Surrendered12/02/2009

800.2/2006 Two Storey Dwelling 268,00010 Alvisio CL EDENSOR PARKMrs F Siracusa MA Determination - Withdrawn17/02/2009

968.1/2007 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 8,5009 Darra PL ST JOHNS PARKT Hong0968/2007DA DA Determination - Surrendered05/02/2009

979.1/2007 Multi-Unit Housing Development 2,200,000269 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSAus-Firstworld Pty Ltd0979/2007DA Approved - Delegated Authority17/02/2009

32.1/2008 Warehouse 1,500,00018 Cavasinni PL WETHERILL PARKCavasinni Constructions Pty Ltd0032/2008DA Approved - Delegated Authority03/02/2009

113.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 520,00014-28 Cobham ST HORSLEY PARKMrs L Rinaldo0113/2008DA Approved - Delegated Authority06/02/2009

195.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 190,00032 Reserve ST SMITHFIELDMr L Pham0195/2008DA Refused - Delegated Authority09/02/2009

231.1/2008 Industry 10,00016 Toohey RD WETHERILL PARKBridal Factory Australia Pty Ltd0231/2008DA Refused - Delegated Authority11/02/2009

1074.1/2008 Commercial Building 280,00056 Canley Vale RD CANLEY VALEVT Architects Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority17/02/2009

1322.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 250,0004 Saltbush PL BOSSLEY PARKMr A Arce Approved - Delegated Authority10/02/2009

1352.1/2008 Industry 012/1345 The Horsley DR WETHERILL PARKMr Wood DA Determination - Withdrawn27/02/2009

1357.1/2008 Warehouse 198,00012 Nello PL WETHERILL PARKMr R Di Filippo Approved - Delegated Authority03/02/2009

1426.1/2008 Outbuilding 22,00017 Atherton ST FAIRFIELD WESTMr A Daher DA Determination - Surrendered10/02/2009

1478.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 450,00063-65 Warana RD CECIL PARKMr A Severino Approved - Delegated Authority03/02/2009

1526.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 271,000191-203 Garfield RD HORSLEY PARKPetra Development Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/02/2009

1536.1/2008 Air Conditioning Unit 049 Kauri ST CABRAMATTAMr DS Tran DA Determination - Withdrawn11/02/2009

1625.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 45,0002 O'Shea CL EDENSOR PARKMr J Romeo Refused - Delegated Authority12/02/2009

1633.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 450,000135 Hamilton RD FAIRFIELDDSB Design & Construction Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority17/02/2009

1646.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 150,0009 Townview RD MT PRITCHARDMr G Kvackovski DA Determination - Withdrawn25/02/2009

1691.1/2008 Granny Flat 35,00065 Church ST CABRAMATTAMr NC Ly Refused - Delegated Authority12/02/2009

1736.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 235,0001A Burley RD HORSLEY PARKMr M Nicola DA Determination - Withdrawn04/02/2009

1743.1/2008 Commercial Building 94,0001111 The Horsley DR WETHERILL PARKAlgorry Zappia & Associated Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/02/2009

1767.1/2008 Aboveground Pool 5,0007 Pendlebury PL ABBOTSBURYMr D Mediati Approved - Delegated Authority05/02/2009

1777.1/2008 Granny Flat 47,00028 Crosby CRES FAIRFIELDChesworth's Home Improvements Pty Ltd DA Determination - Surrendered09/02/2009

1799.1/2008 Industry 019 Junction ST OLD GUILDFORDTotal Scrap Metals Recycling Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority17/02/2009

1811.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 219,81552 Madeline ST FAIRFIELD WESTMr HM Tran Approved - Delegated Authority11/02/2009

1814.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 335,00017 Coventry RD CABRAMATTAC Lim Section 82A Determination - Approval03/02/2009

1821.1/2008 Outbuilding 4,00083 Chifley ST SMITHFIELDMr JT Vocisano Approved - Delegated Authority12/02/2009

1823.1/2008 Outbuilding 4,00010 Perry ST BOSSLEY PARKMr G Iemma Approved - Delegated Authority27/02/2009

1841.1/2008 Vehicle Repair Workshop/Station 05 Centre PL WETHERILL PARKChris Weston & Associates Approved - Delegated Authority10/02/2009

1845.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 12,000165 Maud ST FAIRFIELD WESTMr N Raad Approved - Delegated Authority06/02/2009

1847.1/2008 Granny Flat 12,00079 Henry ST OLD GUILDFORDMr J L Conroy Refused - Delegated Authority12/02/2009

Page 1 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:06:37AM11/03/2009

Officer: All Records

Proposal Type: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/02/2009 to 28/02/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

1851.1/2008 Outbuilding 8,000156 Neville ST SMITHFIELDMr MH Luu Approved - Delegated Authority10/02/2009

1854.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 45,0001 Shaw PL FAIRFIELD WESTMr R Mitrevski DA Determination - Withdrawn18/02/2009

1857.1/2008 Outbuilding 20,00011 Quinn PL PRAIRIEWOODMr B Barkho Approved - Delegated Authority11/02/2009

1861.1/2008 Business Premises 06/51 John ST CABRAMATTAMr A P Homaidan Approved - Delegated Authority09/02/2009

1868.1/2008 Shop 90,000882 The Horsley DR SMITHFIELDSamson & Delilah Approved - Delegated Authority12/02/2009

1881.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 196,0189 Beckenham ST CANLEY VALEFirstyle Homes Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/02/2009

1882.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 25,0008 Norfolk AVE FAIRFIELD WESTMr I Klanac Refused - Delegated Authority13/02/2009

1885.1/2008 Fence 8,0008 Wyatt CL WETHERILL PARKMr DEV Jackson Approved - Delegated Authority06/02/2009

1894.1/2008 Education Establishment 3,00017 Aladore AVE CABRAMATTAWires Approved - Delegated Authority26/02/2009

1904.1/2008 Outbuilding 38,000272-274 Horsley RD HORSLEY PARKAVM Construction Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority10/02/2009

1905.1/2008 Outbuilding 16,00027 Dukic ST BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSHeritage Carports & Awnings Approved - Delegated Authority26/02/2009

1917.1/2008 Home Business-Beauty Salon 0252-260 Cecil RD CECIL PARKMrs D Cassarino Approved - Delegated Authority20/02/2009

1923.1/2008 Outbuilding 7,0001/34 Chancery ST CANLEY VALECPT Corp Pty Ltd DA Determination - Withdrawn12/02/2009

1924.1/2008 Outbuilding 8,0004 Kempsey PL BOSSLEY PARKMrs MA Fisher Approved - Delegated Authority09/02/2009

1926.1/2008 Health Consulting Room/s 0203 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSPham & Le's Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority26/02/2009

1930.1/2008 Industry 18,0004/442-446 Victoria ST WETHERILL PARKEco Solutions Approved - Delegated Authority09/02/2009

1931.1/2008 Subdivision Torrens 044 Polding ST FAIRFIELDMr HI Pauls Approved - Delegated Authority03/02/2009

1933.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 50,0009 Booth CL FAIRFIELD WESTCondor Designs Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority17/02/2009

1935.1/2008 Shop 11,000179-185 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr H Khlide Approved - Delegated Authority13/02/2009

1938.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 248,335198 Neville ST SMITHFIELDMr FM Ojeda Approved - Delegated Authority25/02/2009

1947.1/2008 Fence 9,00020 Wewak PL BOSSLEY PARK2 Design Team DA Determination - Surrendered27/02/2009

1958.1/2008 Industry 020-24 Newton RD WETHERILL PARKPlastform Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority06/02/2009

1962.1/2008 Club 60,000109 Prairie Vale RD BOSSLEY PARKNew Era Design DA Determination - Withdrawn20/02/2009

1963.1/2008 Shop 15,00010/9-11 Hughes ST CABRAMATTAElegant Beauty Nail & Hair College Approved - Delegated Authority27/02/2009

1964.1/2008 Granny Flat 50,00054 Sussex ST CABRAMATTAMr TD Vo Refused - Delegated Authority24/02/2009

1969.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 30,00015 Ashur CRES GREENFIELD PARKMr D Buhagiar Approved - Delegated Authority23/02/2009

1974.1/2008 Bulky Goods/Showroom 033/1-3 Knight ST LANSVALEV V Enterprises Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/02/2009

1975.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 130,00032A Tangerine ST VILLAWOODMr L Contigiani Approved - Delegated Authority12/02/2009

1978.1/2008 Outbuilding 9,000259 Edensor RD EDENSOR PARKWizard Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority06/02/2009

1980.1/2008 Office Fitout 0183-185 Hume HWY CABRAMATTAMr W Mouhajer Approved - Delegated Authority02/02/2009

1982.1/2008 Home Business-Vehicle Repairs 025 Tangerine ST VILLAWOODMr CX Huynh Approved - Delegated Authority09/02/2009

5.1/2009 Outbuilding 18,00035 Francis ST FAIRFIELDMr M Ho Approved - Delegated Authority10/02/2009

Page 2 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:06:37AM11/03/2009

Officer: All Records

Proposal Type: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/02/2009 to 28/02/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

10.1/2009 Outbuilding 38,00013 Cockburn CRES FAIRFIELD EASTMr M Sediqi Approved - Delegated Authority24/02/2009

21.1/2009 Place Of Worship 90,000496 Smithfield RD PRAIRIEWOODSuters Architects Approved - Delegated Authority25/02/2009

28.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 070 John ST CABRAMATTABritten & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/02/2009

38.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 202,77255 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEFirstyle Homes Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority03/02/2009

43.1/2009 Home Business-Clothing 0223 River AVE CARRAMARMr WL Bei Approved - Delegated Authority20/02/2009

45.1/2009 Fence 5,20017 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMs TLT Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority02/02/2009

46.1/2009 Outbuilding 12,0009 Katrina CRES CABRAMATTA WESTHeritage Carports & Awnings Approved - Delegated Authority09/02/2009

47.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,00018/31 Hughes ST CABRAMATTAHpt Architects Refused - Delegated Authority17/02/2009

54.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 190,00016A Beckenham ST CANLEY VALEMr S Patangay Approved - Delegated Authority10/02/2009

57.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 023 Barton ST SMITHFIELDM Coletta Approved - Delegated Authority11/02/2009

61.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,50021 Charlotte CRES CANLEY VALEMrs C Allen Approved - Delegated Authority10/02/2009

62.1/2009 Outbuilding 15,00012 Joyce ST FAIRFIELDWizard Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority17/02/2009

64.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 50,0001 Gambier ST BOSSLEY PARKMr SD Aziz Approved - Delegated Authority26/02/2009

66.1/2009 Festival 0630 Cabramatta RDW BONNYRIGGAssociation Of The SS Crocifisso Approved - Delegated Authority20/02/2009

69.1/2009 Refreshment Room 30,000749 Smithfield RD EDENSOR PARKRichmond & Ross Pty Ltd DA Determination - Withdrawn17/02/2009

73.1/2009 Demolition 8,00098 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr V M Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority06/02/2009

74.1/2009 Outbuilding 10,00034 Derby ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr VK Do Refused - Delegated Authority24/02/2009

76.1/2009 Outbuilding 05 Allambie RD EDENSOR PARKSLM Carport Approved - Delegated Authority09/02/2009

77.1/2009 Outbuilding 5,00053 Innisfail RD WAKELEYFeature Home Improvments Approved - Delegated Authority09/02/2009

78.1/2009 Outbuilding 02 Saltbush PL BOSSLEY PARKMr M Tariveran Approved - Delegated Authority10/02/2009

79.1/2009 Demolition 8,0008 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTMs T Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority06/02/2009

80.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,00018 Hackett RD ABBOTSBURYBuildsmart Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority26/02/2009

85.1/2009 Granny Flat 30,00045 Dublin ST SMITHFIELDMr S Samia Approved - Delegated Authority24/02/2009

89.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,00092 Bulls RD WAKELEYJNL Home Improvements Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority09/02/2009

96.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,90036 Cartwright ST BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr D Anicic Approved - Delegated Authority09/02/2009

103.1/2009 Industry 10,0004/1 Cowpasture PL WETHERILL PARKHave A Seat Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority27/02/2009

108.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,5002A Ellis PDE YENNORABright Home Improvement Pty Ltd DA Determination - Withdrawn27/02/2009

118.1/2009 Outbuilding 11,6009 Mildara PL EDENSOR PARKMs NA Campbell Approved - Delegated Authority19/02/2009

124.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,00034 Canterbury RD ST JOHNS PARKMrs RJ Oakley Approved - Delegated Authority19/02/2009

125.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,00010 Ashur CRES GREENFIELD PARKJNL Home Improvement Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority19/02/2009

158.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,00017 Yalumba PL EDENSOR PARKM Scopelliti Approved - Delegated Authority26/02/2009

Total Development Applications Applications: 95 Est. Cost: 9,747,140

Page 3 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:06:37AM11/03/2009

Officer: All Records

Proposal Type: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/02/2009 to 28/02/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

Est. Cost:Applications: 95GRAND TOTAL

9,747,140

Page 4 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 3:53:45PM3/04/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/03/2009 to 31/03/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

1055.1/2006 Duplex 250,00037 Rosedale ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr P Stefanovic1055/2006DA Approved - Delegated Authority25/03/2009

805.1/2007 Place Of Worship 45,000215-223 Redmayne RD HORSLEY PARKPGH Environmental Planning0805/2007DA Approved - Delegated Authority26/03/2009

1121.1/2007 Commercial/Residential Development 1,000,000263 Cabramatta RDW CABRAMATTAMr D Lu1121/2007DA Approved - Delegated Authority26/03/2009

217.1/2008 Car Wash 280,000154-158 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSR Carwash0217/2008DA Refused - Delegated Authority19/03/2009

330.1/2008 Commercial/Residential Development 1,000,000661-671 Smithfield RD EDENSOR PARKBongiorno Hawkins & Assoc Pty Ltd0330/2008DA Approved - Delegated Authority27/03/2009

331.1/2008 Industry 08 Muir PL WETHERILL PARKQuick Skips Australia Pty Ltd0331/2008DA Approved - Delegated Authority06/03/2009

1142.1/2008 Subdivision Strata 088 John ST CABRAMATTABritten & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority05/03/2009

1143.1/2008 Subdivision Strata 086 John ST CABRAMATTABritten & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority05/03/2009

1144.1/2008 Subdivision Strata 082-84 John ST CABRAMATTABritten & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority05/03/2009

1222.1/2008 Business Premises 422,000824 Woodville RD VILLAWOODPelorus Property Group DA Determination - Withdrawn06/03/2009

1240.1/2008 Club 088-102 Smithfield RD SMITHFIELDPaynter Dixon Constructions Pty Ltd Approved - Council10/03/2009

1332.1/2008 Carpark 263,00015 Nelson ST FAIRFIELDFairfield City Council DA Determination - Withdrawn02/03/2009

1383.1/2008 Sign/s 02 Cowpasture PL WETHERILL PARKGadsden Signs Approved - Delegated Authority10/03/2009

1422.1/2008 Industry 3,0007/1-3 Knight ST LANSVALEGeneral Furniture Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority23/03/2009

1463.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 220,00011 Lambert PL MT PRITCHARDS S Seawin Design & Construction Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority17/03/2009

1515.1/2008 Industry 087-89 Lisbon ST FAIRFIELD EASTRecyling Holdings Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority30/03/2009

1517.1/2008 Commercial Building 20,0001840 The Horsley DR HORSLEY PARKGreenfield DA Services Approved - Delegated Authority06/03/2009

1559.1/2008 Duplex 520,00031 Francis ST FAIRFIELDMr S Alabbasi DA Determination - Withdrawn12/03/2009

1563.1/2008 Multi-Unit Housing Development 950,00036 Stanbrook ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSTotu Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority26/03/2009

1566.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 258,000108 McBurney RD CABRAMATTAMr L Nguyen Refused - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

1590.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 533,5007 Hubert ST FAIRFIELDMr L T Ton Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

1597.1/2008 Subdivision Torrens 0111B High ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr HT Le Approved - Delegated Authority02/03/2009

1598.1/2008 Warehouse 3,000,60839-41 Frank ST WETHERILL PARKAnthony Oliver Architects Approved - Delegated Authority06/03/2009

1614.1/2008 Home Bus-Acupuncture/Massage/Chiro 020 Cunninghame ST FAIRFIELDMrs Q Li Approved - Delegated Authority02/03/2009

1616.1/2008 Child Care Centre and Residence 200,000116 The Avenue CANLEY VALEC C Weston & Assoc Approved - Delegated Authority05/03/2009

1640.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 187,94019 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMr V Huynh Approved - Delegated Authority04/03/2009

1650.1/2008 Air Conditioning Unit 5,00039 Russell ST MT PRITCHARDMr S Rustom Refused - Delegated Authority09/03/2009

1679.1/2008 Sign/s 12,000669 The Horsley DR SMITHFIELDMr I Solomon Approved - Council10/03/2009

1682.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 329,75052 Hemphill AVE MT PRITCHARDCaljaryn Developments Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority25/03/2009

1695.1/2008 Shop 10,00031 Arthur ST CABRAMATTACabramatta Ink Pty Limited Approved - Council10/03/2009

1700.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 253,00070 Margaret ST FAIRFIELD WESTMr A Chau Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

1739.1/2008 Business Premises 536,00015 Elizabeth ST WETHERILL PARKSotto Projects Approved - Delegated Authority10/03/2009

Page 1 of 5

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 3:54:26PM3/04/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/03/2009 to 31/03/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

1744.1/2008 Home Business-Beauty Salon 031A Warragamba CRES BOSSLEY PARKMs N Younan Approved - Delegated Authority03/03/2009

1755.1/2008 Sign/s 5,0004/50 Park RD CABRAMATTAVietnamese Comm In Australia NSW Chapter Inc Approved - Delegated Authority09/03/2009

1769.1/2008 Shop 100,000264 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSHong Phat International Foods Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority25/03/2009

1775.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 295,000146 Burley RD HORSLEY PARKWincrest Homes Approved - Delegated Authority20/03/2009

1806.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 215,00024 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEBellmarch Developments Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority10/03/2009

1812.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 120,00045 Wattle AVE VILLAWOODMr JP Sharma Approved - Delegated Authority09/03/2009

1815.1/2008 Shop 044 Court RD FAIRFIELDMr M Zora DA Determination - Withdrawn18/03/2009

1826.1/2008 Granny Flat 58,00037 Victory ST FAIRFIELD EASTMs TCHT Mai Refused - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

1846.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 65,0001 Morna ST GREENFIELD PARKM Husar Approved - Delegated Authority11/03/2009

1862.1/2008 Recreation Facility 97,000440 Cabramatta RDW CABRAMATTACabramatta Golf Club Limited Approved - Delegated Authority25/03/2009

1871.1/2008 Home Business-Hairdressing 4,00095 Torrens ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMrs V Kiattichaidamrong DA Determination - Withdrawn06/03/2009

1887.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 169,0005 Lupin AVE FAIRFIELD EASTVietnamese Cultural Schools Assoc Inc Approved - Delegated Authority10/03/2009

1888.1/2008 Earthworks 2509 Bimbi PL BONNYRIGGMrs CM Darke Approved - Delegated Authority04/03/2009

1901.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 280,00070 Sussex ST CABRAMATTAWincrest Homes Pty Ltd DA Determination - Withdrawn23/03/2009

1906.1/2008 Warehouse 19,00025 Fairfield ST FAIRFIELD EASTPaul Rolfe Consulting Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority12/03/2009

1907.1/2008 Industry 50,000441-443 Victoria ST WETHERILL PARKPrimo Products Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority12/03/2009

1909.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 48,00010 Richmond CL ST JOHNS PARKMr MR Khan Approved - Delegated Authority27/03/2009

1910.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 102,0005 Richmond CL ST JOHNS PARKMrs R Sadiq Refused - Delegated Authority27/03/2009

1915.1/2008 Home Business-Clothing 0328 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMs J Dinh Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

1916.1/2008 Outbuilding 45,0003 Maugham CRES WETHERILL PARKMs TLC Do Refused - Delegated Authority26/03/2009

1919.1/2008 Shade shelter 4,0006/162 Chifley ST WETHERILL PARKMr AW Balamoan DA Determination - Withdrawn18/03/2009

1921.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 15,00036 Ace AVE FAIRFIELDDvyne Design & Construction Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority02/03/2009

1928.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 270,00049 Greenfield RD GREENFIELD PARKB A C Design Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

1932.1/2008 Home Business-Beauty Salon 15,00031 Neerini AVE SMITHFIELDMr KR Bird DA Determination - Withdrawn06/03/2009

1943.1/2008 Footpath Trading 1,00010/85 John ST CABRAMATTAMr L Leung Approved - Delegated Authority18/03/2009

1946.1/2008 Industry 019 Daniel ST WETHERILL PARKHospeco Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

1948.1/2008 Sign/s 2,900238 Cabramatta RDW CABRAMATTAMr T Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority06/03/2009

1959.1/2008 Outbuilding 12,00090 McBurney RD CABRAMATTAMr PE Marsh DA Determination - Withdrawn19/03/2009

1961.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 47,50059 Gwandalan RD EDENSOR PARKMr G Gattellari Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

1966.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 200,00010 Province ST ABBOTSBURYEastline Developments Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority27/03/2009

1967.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 200,00010 Province ST ABBOTSBURYEastline Developments Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority27/03/2009

1968.1/2008 Outbuilding 21,000148-158 Abbotsbury DR HORSLEY PARKMr C Taccone Refused - Delegated Authority25/03/2009

Page 2 of 5

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 3:54:26PM3/04/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/03/2009 to 31/03/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

1981.1/2008 Home Bus-Health Consult (medical+dental) 0141 Mimosa RD BOSSLEY PARKMiss N Khamo Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

1984.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 200,00076 Coonawarra ST EDENSOR PARKMr S Jebrail Approved - Delegated Authority17/03/2009

1989.1/2008 Sign/s 40,000234 Hamilton RD FAIRFIELD HEIGHTS7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority23/03/2009

3.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 11,9958 Berrigan PL BOSSLEY PARKWizard Home Improvements Refused - Delegated Authority25/03/2009

8.1/2009 Shop 0208 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMagic Charcoal Chickens Approved - Delegated Authority12/03/2009

11.1/2009 Refreshment Room 700,0001179 The Horsley DR WETHERILL PARKCentrum Archittects Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority25/03/2009

21.1/2009 Place Of Worship 90,000496 Smithfield RD PRAIRIEWOODSuters Architects Approved - Delegated Authority18/03/2009

23.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 250,00044 Salter RD BOSSLEY PARKMr E Samuel Refused - Delegated Authority11/03/2009

24.1/2009 Shop 03/53 Smart ST FAIRFIELDMr S Alabbasi DA Determination - Withdrawn09/03/2009

26.1/2009 Outbuilding 39,00025 Power ST PRAIRIEWOODWizard Home Improvements Refused - Delegated Authority11/03/2009

27.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 700,000113 Wilson RD BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr A Khodr Refused - Delegated Authority10/03/2009

39.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,50033-34 Alaine PL CECIL PARKMrs S Younan Approved - Delegated Authority09/03/2009

40.1/2009 Refreshment Room 20,000231 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMr J Mellino Approved - Council10/03/2009

44.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 0153-189 Wallgrove RD CECIL PARKMr A Asnciar Application Withdrawn03/03/2009

51.1/2009 Inground Pool 13,95071 Lily ST WETHERILL PARKMr T T Zgiar Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

52.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 160,000419-425 Elizabeth DR BONNYRIGGChampion Homes DA Determination - Withdrawn03/03/2009

55.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,30031 Wolseley ST FAIRFIELDMr Z Sekulic Refused - Delegated Authority02/03/2009

56.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 267,91698 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr V M Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority31/03/2009

59.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 222,0005 Thomas ST FAIRFIELDMr K Yousif Approved - Delegated Authority11/03/2009

60.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 233,0008 Beckenham ST CANLEY VALEMs TP Tran Approved - Delegated Authority31/03/2009

65.1/2009 Outbuilding 7,00011 Grainger AVE MT PRITCHARDSunford Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority18/03/2009

71.1/2009 Medical Centre 60,0003/118 Ware ST FAIRFIELDCondor Designs Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

75.1/2009 Health Consulting Room/s 04/119A John ST CABRAMATTAMr J Zhang Approved - Delegated Authority02/03/2009

82.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 0228 Polding ST SMITHFIELDBritten & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority27/03/2009

84.1/2009 Home Business-Office 04 Dixon ST ABBOTSBURYProfessional Print Mgnt Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority18/03/2009

88.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 16,00018 Chisholm ST SMITHFIELDMr G Ljubojevic Approved - Delegated Authority04/03/2009

90.1/2009 Outbuilding 7,00014 Canva ST CANLEY VALEJNL Home Improvements Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority02/03/2009

93.1/2009 Industry 010/12-18 Fairfield ST FAIRFIELD EASTDelta Kitchens Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

94.1/2009 Shop 5,000709 Cabramatta RDW BONNYRIGGMrs JA Keighley Approved - Delegated Authority13/03/2009

99.1/2009 Outbuilding 24,00015 Donahue CL PRAIRIEWOODPatioland Parramatta Pty Ltd Refused - Delegated Authority26/03/2009

100.1/2009 Community Event 01788 The Horsley DR HORSLEY PARKOur Lady of Victories Catholic Parish Approved - Delegated Authority17/03/2009

101.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 280,00055 Greenfield RD GREENFIELD PARKMr D S Flora Approved - Delegated Authority27/03/2009

Page 3 of 5

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 3:54:26PM3/04/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/03/2009 to 31/03/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

102.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,00026 Sulman RD CABRAMATTA WESTJNL Home Improvement Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/03/2009

104.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 01111 The Horsley DR WETHERILL PARKProject Surveyors Approved - Delegated Authority12/03/2009

107.1/2009 Granny Flat 35,00046 Alick ST CABRAMATTAMr HP Le Approved - Delegated Authority18/03/2009

111.1/2009 Home Business-Hairdressing 02 Wheller ST BOSSLEY PARKS Kokten Approved - Delegated Authority19/03/2009

113.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 21,0004 Oak PL MT PRITCHARDMr TDD Bui Approved - Delegated Authority10/03/2009

114.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,00042 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEJNL Home Improvement Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/03/2009

119.1/2009 Granny Flat 39,00031 Victory ST FAIRFIELDMr MA Toro Refused - Delegated Authority02/03/2009

120.1/2009 Home Business-Hairdressing 16,00015 Gurley PL BONNYRIGGMr B Khoury Approved - Delegated Authority18/03/2009

128.1/2009 Sign/s 40,000167 Meadows RD MT PRITCHARD7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority24/03/2009

129.1/2009 Outbuilding 27,0006 Thorpe PL ABBOTSBURYSunscreen Patios & Pergolas Approved - Delegated Authority27/03/2009

130.1/2009 Outbuilding 200447 Victoria ST WETHERILL PARKState Wide Industrial Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/03/2009

134.1/2009 Medical Centre 5,00027/48-50 Hill ST CABRAMATTADr KT Dinh Approved - Delegated Authority23/03/2009

136.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 250,00013 Chisholm ST SMITHFIELDA Jawabreh Approved - Delegated Authority10/03/2009

139.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,00012 Haylen PL EDENSOR PARKMr SL Messner Approved - Delegated Authority04/03/2009

142.1/2009 Outbuilding 10,00021 Katinka ST BONNYRIGGMrs S Phanthavong Approved - Delegated Authority18/03/2009

143.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,0005 Sparta PL BOSSLEY PARKHeritage Carports & Awnings Approved - Delegated Authority25/03/2009

145.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 191,00016 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEFirstyle Homes Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority18/03/2009

147.1/2009 Industry 02 Ormsby PL WETHERILL PARKPacific Bodyworks Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority26/03/2009

148.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,00014 Cunninghame ST FAIRFIELDJNL Home Improvement Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority30/03/2009

149.1/2009 Home Business-Beauty Salon 018 Bramley ST FAIRFIELD WESTMr M Daniel DA Determination - Withdrawn10/03/2009

150.1/2009 Demolition 5,00049 Lovoni ST CABRAMATTAMr SN Quan Approved - Delegated Authority02/03/2009

152.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,00043A Stimson ST SMITHFIELDMr B Bell Approved - Delegated Authority30/03/2009

153.1/2009 Shop 5,0001/5 Rigg PL BONNYRIGGMr W KABBOUT Approved - Delegated Authority18/03/2009

154.1/2009 Shop 5,0001/81 John ST CABRAMATTAHong Enterprise P/L DA Determination - Withdrawn05/03/2009

155.1/2009 Business Premises 10,000200 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr W KWOK Approved - Delegated Authority04/03/2009

157.1/2009 Inground Pool 29,00099 Nelson ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr M Tomac Approved - Delegated Authority30/03/2009

160.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,60028 Torrens ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr V C Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority24/03/2009

163.1/2009 Granny Flat 40,00030 Melbourne RD ST JOHNS PARKMr VC Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority13/03/2009

164.1/2009 Medical Centre 10,00013/48-50 Hill ST CABRAMATTAMrs MML Le Approved - Delegated Authority23/03/2009

169.1/2009 Outbuilding 5,00099 Shakespeare ST WETHERILL PARKMr R Lee Approved - Delegated Authority17/03/2009

170.1/2009 Outbuilding 20,00031 Malcolm AVE MT PRITCHARDMr G Sacca Approved - Delegated Authority18/03/2009

171.1/2009 Granny Flat 35,00055 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTV Vu Approved - Delegated Authority30/03/2009

Page 4 of 5

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 3:54:26PM3/04/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/03/2009 to 31/03/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

174.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 90,0009 Partridge AVE YENNORADesigncorp Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority30/03/2009

178.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 14,00024 Gilbert ST CABRAMATTAJFT Constructions Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority10/03/2009

180.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 230,000163 Gladstone ST CABRAMATTAMs L Truong Approved - Delegated Authority31/03/2009

181.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,54753 Apache RD BOSSLEY PARKMr PC Loadman Approved - Delegated Authority19/03/2009

185.1/2009 Demolition 8,00049 Satara AVE CABRAMATTA WESTMr PA Som Approved - Delegated Authority09/03/2009

189.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 05 Marlborough ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr D Mitrovic Approved - Delegated Authority17/03/2009

190.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 0195 Ware ST FAIRFIELDAustral Building Corporation Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority26/03/2009

196.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 240,00040 Galton ST WETHERILL PARKMr M Karlo Approved - Delegated Authority30/03/2009

203.1/2009 Fence 11,00042 Galton ST WETHERILL PARKNTL Building Contractor Approved - Delegated Authority19/03/2009

206.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,0008 Caulfield CRES ST JOHNS PARKJNL Home Improvement Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority31/03/2009

210.1/2009 Outbuilding 7,0004 Durack CL EDENSOR PARKMrs L Qassis Approved - Delegated Authority27/03/2009

211.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,000259 St Johns RD ST JOHNS PARKM Gulic Approved - Delegated Authority31/03/2009

216.1/2009 Demolition 5,00026 Percy ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr J Marando Approved - Delegated Authority24/03/2009

220.1/2009 Demolition 9,000605 Cabramatta RDW CABRAMATTA WESTMr SF Stivala Approved - Delegated Authority24/03/2009

221.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,00024 Lang ST SMITHFIELDMr I Ciric Approved - Delegated Authority20/03/2009

234.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,00015 Albany CL WAKELEYMr L Brajkovic Approved - Delegated Authority30/03/2009

245.1/2009 Demolition 11,00031 Fifth AVE CANLEY VALEMrs RT Birett Approved - Delegated Authority30/03/2009

246.1/2009 Demolition 5,00017 Stimson ST SMITHFIELDMr L Estipho Approved - Delegated Authority30/03/2009

257.1/2009 Demolition 7,50083 Nelson ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr I Ivanovski Approved - Delegated Authority31/03/2009

Total Development Applications Applications: 147 Est. Cost: 17,623,956

Est. Cost:Applications: 147GRAND TOTAL

17,623,956

Page 5 of 5

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 2:42:15PM11/05/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/04/2009 to 30/04/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

1361.1/2003 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 7,00055 Ryder RD GREENFIELD PARKMr F Raso1361/2003DA DA Determination - Surrendered23/04/2009

1558.1/2006 Dual Occupancy-Attached 280,00012 Ferngrove RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMrs S Spasojevic1558/2006DA Approved - Delegated Authority23/04/2009

885.1/2007 Club 053 Cabramatta RDE CABRAMATTAPaynter Dixon Constructions Pty Ltd0885/2007DA Approved - Delegated Authority07/04/2009

994.1/2007 Warehouse 5,000169-173 Hume HWY CABRAMATTAMr APTT Nguyen0994/2007DA Approved - Delegated Authority08/04/2009

55.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 304,700186-188 Cecil RD CECIL PARKMr CL Demasi0055/2008DA Approved - Delegated Authority08/04/2009

1207.1/2008 Outbuilding 10,50041 Madeline ST FAIRFIELD WESTMiss J Chau DA Determination - Withdrawn17/04/2009

1250.1/2008 Industry 600,000148 Hume HWY LANSVALESedrala Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority21/04/2009

1280.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 400,00048 Russell ST MT PRITCHARDMr G Kouris Approved - Delegated Authority16/04/2009

1335.1/2008 Subdivision Torrens 02245-2253 Elizabeth DR CECIL PARKBritten & Accociates Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority27/04/2009

1337.1/2008 Subdivision Torrens 0147-161 Garfield RD HORSLEY PARKMrs S Lim Approved - Delegated Authority07/04/2009

1368.1/2008 Triplex 400,000112 High ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr A Taleb Approved - Delegated Authority06/04/2009

1389.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 456,00035 Moonshine AVE CABRAMATTA WESTMiss K Hua Approved - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

1452.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 50,00012 Allowrie RD VILLAWOODG C Building Designer Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

1506.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 90,00024 Shackel AVE OLD GUILDFORDMr GH Turner Section 82A Determination - Refusal08/04/2009

1672.1/2008 Flood Lighting 28,00035 Florence ST MT PRITCHARDFairfield City Council Approved - Delegated Authority06/04/2009

1688.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 263,000136 Broomfield ST CABRAMATTAMr H L Ly Approved - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

1749.1/2008 Outbuilding 15,00013 Clare ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr T H Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority08/04/2009

1792.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 209,34236 Taralga ST OLD GUILDFORDMs JG Williams DA Determination - Withdrawn08/04/2009

1842.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 174,040382 Elizabeth DR MT PRITCHARDMr J Gioffre Approved - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

1877.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 273,000387A Elizabeth DR MT PRITCHARDMr RN Moopnar Refused - Delegated Authority30/04/2009

1890.1/2008 Granny Flat 50,000128 Orchardleigh ST OLD GUILDFORDMr B Al Reziq Approved - Delegated Authority14/04/2009

1973.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 180,00086 Hollywood DR LANSVALEMr M Demetlika Approved - Delegated Authority08/04/2009

1976.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 349,050228 Ware ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr A Lu Approved - Delegated Authority22/04/2009

12.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 80,00028 Raphael ST GREENFIELD PARKMrs RZ Hanna Refused - Delegated Authority06/04/2009

34.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 708,00022 Levuka ST CABRAMATTABritten & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority06/04/2009

50.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,7001/14 Coolibar ST CANLEY HEIGHTSWizard Home Improvements Refused - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

53.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 212,000419-425 Elizabeth DR BONNYRIGGChampion Homes DA Determination - Withdrawn09/04/2009

83.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 669,0001 Bindaree ST LANSVALEMr R Lam Refused - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

95.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 213,5436 Beckenham ST CANLEY VALEEden Brae Homes Approved - Delegated Authority28/04/2009

98.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 212,00013 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMr S Pandaram Approved - Delegated Authority22/04/2009

106.1/2009 Inground Pool 23,500152 Quarry RD BOSSLEY PARKKallah Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority03/04/2009

110.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 199,164222 Victoria ST WETHERILL PARKEden Brae Homes Approved - Delegated Authority23/04/2009

Page 1 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 2:42:59PM11/05/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/04/2009 to 30/04/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

115.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 234,32049 Lovoni ST CABRAMATTAMr SN Quan Approved - Delegated Authority28/04/2009

116.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 350,000120 Nelson ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr P Vandy Approved - Delegated Authority21/04/2009

119.1/2009 Granny Flat 39,00031 Victory ST FAIRFIELDMr MA Toro Section 82A Determination - Refusal29/04/2009

126.1/2009 Outbuilding 38,0005 Andrea CL BONNYRIGGMr V Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority30/04/2009

133.1/2009 Commercial Building 15,000749 Smithfield RD EDENSOR PARKRichmond & Ross Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority21/04/2009

140.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 188,8709 Townview RD MT PRITCHARDMr D Kvackovski Approved - Delegated Authority02/04/2009

141.1/2009 Commercial Building 95,000233 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSTranspacific Group Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority06/04/2009

151.1/2009 Granny Flat 35,00012 Benelong AVE SMITHFIELDMr S Ayyoub Approved - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

156.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 135,0003 Lovoni ST CABRAMATTAMr C Huynh Refused - Delegated Authority15/04/2009

159.1/2009 Inground Pool 35,00028 Garrison RD BOSSLEY PARKMr P Kakovski Approved - Delegated Authority03/04/2009

162.1/2009 Office Fitout 2,00076 Broomfield ST CABRAMATTAMr J Kuoch Approved - Delegated Authority08/04/2009

167.1/2009 Granny Flat 40,00020 Ryder RD GREENFIELD PARKMr K Jardak Approved - Delegated Authority07/04/2009

173.1/2009 Granny Flat 40,0002 Hoyle PL GREENFIELD PARKJardak Developments Approved - Delegated Authority07/04/2009

177.1/2009 Commercial Building 22074 Thorney RD FAIRFIELD WESTMr K Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

186.1/2009 Business Premises 50,00056 Meadows RD MT PRITCHARDMr L Al-Sheikh Approved - Delegated Authority16/04/2009

194.1/2009 Retaining Wall 6,000373 North Liverpool RD BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr TN Cao Approved - Delegated Authority24/04/2009

197.1/2009 Outbuilding 7,0004 Katinka ST BONNYRIGGMr V Petrovsky Approved - Delegated Authority03/04/2009

198.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 210,00016 Wewak PL BOSSLEY PARKMr J Gittany Approved - Delegated Authority08/04/2009

199.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 298,0004 McIlvenie ST CANLEY HEIGHTSLily Homes Approved - Delegated Authority08/04/2009

200.1/2009 Festival 12,000697A Smithfield RD EDENSOR PARKLao Buddhist Society Of NSW Inc Approved - Delegated Authority08/04/2009

202.1/2009 Industry 0104-108 Fairfield ST FAIRFIELD EASTAll West Diesel Approved - Delegated Authority20/04/2009

204.1/2009 Shop 2,00070-72 John ST CABRAMATTAMr T Thai Approved - Delegated Authority02/04/2009

209.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 2,00035 Cutler RD LANSVALEMr H A Salama Approved - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

212.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 80,0005 Kay ST OLD GUILDFORDBaini Design Approved - Delegated Authority21/04/2009

215.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 37,00067 Fairview RD CABRAMATTAMr VD Pham Approved - Delegated Authority21/04/2009

219.1/2009 Shop 15,000101-103 John ST CABRAMATTAMrs T A Truong Approved - Delegated Authority06/04/2009

226.1/2009 Outbuilding 10,0006 O'Meally ST PRAIRIEWOODMr A Mansour Approved - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

227.1/2009 Fence 6,00014 Sydney Luker AVE CABRAMATTA WESTMs K T P Hua Approved - Delegated Authority21/04/2009

228.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,0004 Cusak CL EDENSOR PARKMr R Capaldi Approved - Delegated Authority24/04/2009

229.1/2009 Tow Truck Depot 010 Smithfield RD SMITHFIELDMr E Horish Approved - Delegated Authority07/04/2009

238.1/2009 Fence 15,0002 Third AVE CANLEY VALEAusland Constructions Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/04/2009

241.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 0114 Camden ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSLean Lackenby & Hayward Approved - Delegated Authority27/04/2009

Page 2 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 2:42:59PM11/05/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/04/2009 to 30/04/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

243.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 01/50A Park RD CABRAMATTARS Canceri Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

244.1/2009 Outbuilding 35,000169 Mimosa RD BOSSLEY PARKMs G Menna Approved - Delegated Authority30/04/2009

248.1/2009 Outbuilding 33,50033 Reservoir RD MT PRITCHARDAntwork Design Approved - Delegated Authority01/04/2009

249.1/2009 Business Premises 665,00034 John ST CABRAMATTAGreenfield DA Services Approved - Delegated Authority06/04/2009

255.1/2009 Granny Flat 25,00049 Dransfield RD EDENSOR PARKMr AO Toma Approved - Delegated Authority21/04/2009

260.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 60,0005 Denbern ST BOSSLEY PARKPerfection Building Services Approved - Delegated Authority30/04/2009

261.1/2009 Granny Flat 19,400149 Townview RD MT PRITCHARDMr K Mitchell Approved - Delegated Authority24/04/2009

266.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 35,00021 Bowden ST CABRAMATTAMr Z Kalapac Approved - Delegated Authority22/04/2009

267.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 27,000141 Bossley RD BOSSLEY PARKMr A AL-Dakak Approved - Delegated Authority03/04/2009

272.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 150,00059 Hassall ST SMITHFIELDA & K Engineering Group Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority30/04/2009

278.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,0009 Narellan CRES BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSSLM Carports Approved - Delegated Authority17/04/2009

279.1/2009 Fence 7,5004 Third AVE CANLEY VALEAusland Constructions Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/04/2009

281.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,10013 Hope CRES BOSSLEY PARKAmazing Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority17/04/2009

282.1/2009 Inground Pool 34,80027-29 Coreen AVE CECIL PARKMr S Ferguson Approved - Delegated Authority30/04/2009

283.1/2009 Fence 2,04834 Begovich CRES ABBOTSBURYMr P Melodia Approved - Delegated Authority24/04/2009

286.1/2009 Fence 7,70038 Madeline ST FAIRFIELD WESTMiss JUP Ha Approved - Delegated Authority28/04/2009

290.1/2009 Outbuilding 5,00034 Province ST ABBOTSBURYJNL Home Improvement Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority14/04/2009

292.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 10,00022 Freeman AVE CANLEY VALECondor Designs Architects Approved - Delegated Authority24/04/2009

294.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 20,00057 Lime ST CABRAMATTA WESTMs TP To Approved - Delegated Authority16/04/2009

299.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 48,0001A Stevenson ST WETHERILL PARKMr C Kilicoglu Approved - Delegated Authority14/04/2009

310.1/2009 Fence 4,50014 Hackett RD ABBOTSBURYMr VK Ouy Approved - Delegated Authority17/04/2009

315.1/2009 Demolition 4,90016 Delamere ST CANLEY VALEPajic Building Co Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority15/04/2009

316.1/2009 Fence 6,47088 Mandarin ST VILLAWOODMr ST Ho Approved - Delegated Authority21/04/2009

318.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 35,00029 Alt ST SMITHFIELDMr D Naidu Approved - Delegated Authority28/04/2009

323.1/2009 Outbuilding 5,00059 Province ST ABBOTSBURYMr SM Hussaini Approved - Delegated Authority28/04/2009

325.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 5,5002 Batman PL ST JOHNS PARKMr VQ Le Approved - Delegated Authority28/04/2009

328.1/2009 Granny Flat 62,30053 Lansdowne RD CANLEY VALET N Constructions Pty Ltd Refused - Delegated Authority29/04/2009

338.1/2009 Demolition 8,0002 Caranya PL CABRAMATTA WESTMs LU Wang Approved - Delegated Authority28/04/2009

344.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,00042 Delgarno RD BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMs DH Ly Approved - Delegated Authority23/04/2009

345.1/2009 Demolition 10,0003 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTMiss THT Vu Approved - Delegated Authority28/04/2009

346.1/2009 Demolition 5,00041 Marley CRES BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr A Helmy Approved - Delegated Authority28/04/2009

363.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,00064 Chifley ST SMITHFIELDWizard Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority30/04/2009

Page 3 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 2:42:59PM11/05/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/04/2009 to 30/04/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

376.1/2009 Outbuilding 5,0005 Rosemont AVE SMITHFIELDMr K Heckenburg Approved - Delegated Authority29/04/2009

Total Development Applications Applications: 97 Est. Cost: 9,828,667

Est. Cost:Applications: 97GRAND TOTAL

9,828,667

Page 4 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 4:09:51PM2/06/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/05/2009 to 31/05/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

303.1/2007 Outbuilding 11,00088 Eton ST SMITHFIELDAdvanced Garages0303/2007DA Section 82A Determination - Refusal18/05/2009

1185.1/2008 Education Establishment 12,000,000217-233 Horsley RD HORSLEY PARKAssyrian School Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

1221.1/2008 Outbuilding 12,0006 Cook AVE CANLEY VALESambuild Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/05/2009

1311.1/2008 Industry 055-63 Market ST SMITHFIELDC C Western & Assoc DA Determination - Withdrawn08/05/2009

1369.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 44,0008 Blaxland ST YENNORASun Engineering DA Determination - Surrendered14/05/2009

1489.1/2008 Duplex 300,00014 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr R Sekulic Approved - Delegated Authority05/05/2009

1620.1/2008 Industry 19,000250 Hume HWY LANSVALEMr VK Quy Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

1643.1/2008 Aged Persons Housing 1,055,00025 Koonoona AVE VILLAWOODResitech Dept Of Housing Approved - Delegated Authority19/05/2009

1684.1/2008 Duplex 248,000125 Delamere ST CANLEY VALEMr P Kyriakos Approved - Delegated Authority29/05/2009

1702.1/2008 Community Facility 355,510124 The Horsley DR CARRAMARFowler Homes Approved - Delegated Authority06/05/2009

1718.1/2008 Shop 6,000100 John ST CABRAMATTACPT Corp Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

1738.1/2008 Junk Yard 071 Railway ST YENNORAMr M Kassem DA Determination - Withdrawn08/05/2009

1802.1/2008 Refreshment Room 95,000751 Smithfield RD EDENSOR PARKTT Red Rooster Bonnyrigg Pty Ltd Refused - Delegated Authority18/05/2009

1831.1/2008 Warehouse 5,00035/1-3 Knight ST LANSVALET & D Trading Co Pty Ltd Refused - Delegated Authority29/05/2009

1832.1/2008 Warehouse 5,00014/1-3 Knight ST LANSVALET & D Trading Co Pty Ltd Refused - Delegated Authority29/05/2009

1840.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 260,00054 Walworth RD HORSLEY PARKMr V Bongiorno Approved - Delegated Authority29/05/2009

1864.1/2008 Tow Truck Depot 012 Tangerine ST VILLAWOODMr S Ayouby Refused - Delegated Authority29/05/2009

1952.1/2008 Club 170,000101 Meadows RD MT PRITCHARDPaynter Dixon Constructions Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

1970.1/2008 Triplex 390,00024 Bodalla ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMatthew Quomi Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/05/2009

6.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 170,00013 Telford PL PRAIRIEWOODMr D Konjevic Refused - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

42.1/2009 Group Home 045 Polding ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMrs A Castaneda Approved - Council26/05/2009

45.1/2009 Fence 5,20017 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMs TLT Nguyen DA Determination - Surrendered14/05/2009

72.1/2009 Industry 24,50039/1-3 Knight ST LANSVALEMr XY Cai Approved - Delegated Authority21/05/2009

74.1/2009 Outbuilding 10,00034 Derby ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr VK Do Section 82A Determination - Refusal01/05/2009

99.1/2009 Outbuilding 24,00015 Donahue CL PRAIRIEWOODPatioland Parramatta Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority21/05/2009

109.1/2009 Bulky Goods/Showroom 200,00015 Elizabeth ST WETHERILL PARKGaintak Investment Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority25/05/2009

123.1/2009 Shop 10,00070-72 John ST CABRAMATTAMr K Ly Approved - Delegated Authority18/05/2009

132.1/2009 Triplex 450,00023 Ligar ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr M Brikha Approved - Delegated Authority21/05/2009

137.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 65,00043 Avenel ST CANLEY VALEMr K H Chea Approved - Delegated Authority05/05/2009

144.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 331,00098 Derria ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMiss GP Tran Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

184.1/2009 Granny Flat 38,00052 Campbell ST FAIRFIELD EASTMiss GV Huynh Approved - Delegated Authority04/05/2009

187.1/2009 Vehicle Repair Workshop/Station 20,000146 Hume HWY LANSVALEMr J Ayoubi Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

Page 1 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 4:10:41PM2/06/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/05/2009 to 31/05/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

191.1/2009 Granny Flat 50,00013 Mumford RD CABRAMATTA WESTMr DD Le Approved - Delegated Authority06/05/2009

195.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 270,00012 Wattle AVE VILLAWOODVirtual Y Designs Approved - Delegated Authority22/05/2009

207.1/2009 Shop 13,0008-36 Station ST FAIRFIELDGreen Valley Enterprises Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

208.1/2009 Industry 011/367-369 Victoria ST WETHERILL PARKNadia's Performance Studio Approved - Delegated Authority05/05/2009

214.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 019 Nelson ST FAIRFIELDM L Noble Properties Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

217.1/2009 Commercial Building 35,00043 Smart ST FAIRFIELDTonip Pty Ltd Design Group Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

218.1/2009 Home Bus-Health Consult (medical+dental) 072 Kingfisher AVE BOSSLEY PARKMrs DH Bengamin Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

222.1/2009 Shop 05-9 Freedom PLZ CABRAMATTAOK Supermarket Approved - Delegated Authority05/05/2009

225.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 273,26171 Dawson ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSEagle Homes Approved - Delegated Authority20/05/2009

230.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 250,00017 Stivala PL BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr A Hermez Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

233.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 0Border RD HORSLEY PARKCrown Castle Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority01/05/2009

242.1/2009 Shop 2,000204 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr A Scampino Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

247.1/2009 Industry 1,00016/272 Victoria ST WETHERILL PARKMr M Cengiz Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

252.1/2009 Industry 3,0001/27A Davis RD WETHERILL PARKSelect Distribution Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

256.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 391,6005 Zuni CL BOSSLEY PARKMr S Alyas Approved - Delegated Authority07/05/2009

258.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 300,00019 Stivala PL BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr W A Shah Approved - Delegated Authority08/05/2009

263.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 300,0008 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTC Lim Approved - Delegated Authority04/05/2009

268.1/2009 Shop 07/48-66 The Horsley DR CARRAMARMr J C Luzardo Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

270.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 280,00014 Mataro CL EDENSOR PARKMr S Zaami Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

273.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 238,00083 Torrens ST CANLEY HEIGHTSBoris Grgurevic & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

275.1/2009 Shop 10,000250 Fairfield ST FAIRFIELD EASTMr A Krishna Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

276.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 334,78515 Sandringham ST ST JOHNS PARKMs T X T Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority22/05/2009

284.1/2009 Shop 15,00070-72 John ST CABRAMATTAMr NO Ta Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

285.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 150,0006 Witt CL EDENSOR PARKMr CB Pham Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

287.1/2009 Place Of Worship 3,000114 Broomfield ST CABRAMATTAKampuchea Krom Culture Centre of NSW Inc Complete25/05/2009

291.1/2009 Fence 5,00044 Northumberland ST BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr F Trstenjak Approved - Delegated Authority06/05/2009

293.1/2009 Granny Flat 45,0001 Corona RD FAIRFIELD WESTMr M Daniel Approved - Delegated Authority28/05/2009

298.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 278,4422 Caranya PL CABRAMATTA WESTMs LU Wang Approved - Delegated Authority22/05/2009

300.1/2009 Granny Flat 40,00013 Granville ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr S Ayyoub Approved - Delegated Authority04/05/2009

301.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 235,00034 Water ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr M Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority06/05/2009

302.1/2009 Civil Works 08 East PDE FAIRFIELDHughes Trueman Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority22/05/2009

306.1/2009 Bulky Goods/Showroom 60,00015 Elizabeth ST WETHERILL PARKGaintak Investment Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority25/05/2009

Page 2 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 4:10:41PM2/06/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/05/2009 to 31/05/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

307.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 207,8673 Lang ST SMITHFIELDMr J Urdanegui Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

309.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 180,00044 Charles ST SMITHFIELDBarbara Tarnawski Architects Approved - Delegated Authority28/05/2009

320.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,00034 Quiros AVE FAIRFIELD WESTMr B Harrison Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

321.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 0176-186 Duff RD CECIL PARKMrs DM Nicoletti Approved - Delegated Authority01/05/2009

326.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 16,00024 Bauer RD CABRAMATTA WESTMr MS Khuong DA Determination - Withdrawn18/05/2009

330.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 189,62122 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEEden Brae Homes Approved - Delegated Authority20/05/2009

333.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 140,00083 Railway PDE CANLEY VALEMs AAH Nguyen DA Determination - Withdrawn01/05/2009

337.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 228,0004 Whyalla CL WAKELEYClarendon Homes Approved - Delegated Authority20/05/2009

348.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 284,00028 Lisa CRES BONNYRIGGMr M T Quach Approved - Delegated Authority19/05/2009

351.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 226,27535 Huon ST CABRAMATTAMs X C Tang Approved - Delegated Authority27/05/2009

353.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 380,00051 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr VV Tran Approved - Delegated Authority28/05/2009

355.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 516,00010 Brown ST SMITHFIELDFocus Homes Complete27/05/2009

362.1/2009 Industry 025 The Promenade YENNORAMr A El Sayed Approved - Delegated Authority21/05/2009

364.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,5001 Hemphill AVE MT PRITCHARDMr AP Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

368.1/2009 Granny Flat 23,00027 Shackel AVE OLD GUILDFORDMr J Rabadi Approved - Delegated Authority28/05/2009

375.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 5,00023 Beckenham ST CANLEY VALEMr V H Chau Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

381.1/2009 Demolition 10,00088 John ST CABRAMATTATH Lu Approved - Delegated Authority06/05/2009

382.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 132,53411 Stanbrook ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSCape Cod Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority21/05/2009

384.1/2009 Industry 089 Market ST SMITHFIELDMr L Chau Approved - Delegated Authority19/05/2009

386.1/2009 Demolition 8,0005 Abercrombie ST CABRAMATTA WESTMrs QC Bui Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

387.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 70,00016 Glenroy CRES ST JOHNS PARKAlby Design & Construction Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority20/05/2009

388.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,00043 Salisbury ST CANLEY HEIGHTSJNL Home Improvement Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority28/05/2009

393.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,0004 Santangelo CL EDENSOR PARKJNL Home Improvement Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority12/05/2009

397.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,50063 Buranda CRES ST JOHNS PARKMr KQ Lam Approved - Delegated Authority21/05/2009

400.1/2009 Warehouse 010 Allen PL WETHERILL PARKHunter & Northern Logistics Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority19/05/2009

404.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 0302 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSProject Surveyors Approved - Delegated Authority11/05/2009

408.1/2009 Granny Flat 50,000257 Mimosa RD GREENFIELD PARKMs T N H Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority28/05/2009

414.1/2009 Demolition 7,50016 Brahma CL BOSSLEY PARKMs C Huynh Approved - Delegated Authority18/05/2009

415.1/2009 Outbuilding 2,86046 Warrumbungle ST FAIRFIELD WESTMr D Boyd Approved - Delegated Authority18/05/2009

428.1/2009 Outbuilding 11,00025 Aplin RD BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr N Cuk Approved - Delegated Authority19/05/2009

430.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 11,90093 Roland ST BOSSLEY PARKS.P.S. Home Improvements DA Determination - Withdrawn20/05/2009

445.1/2009 Demolition 2,00017 Hiland CRES SMITHFIELDMr R Sullo Approved - Delegated Authority28/05/2009

Page 3 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 4:10:41PM2/06/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/05/2009 to 31/05/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

446.1/2009 Community Facility 65,00084-88 Restwell RD BOSSLEY PARKAca Design Consultants Approved - Delegated Authority20/05/2009

Total Development Applications Applications: 97 Est. Cost: 22,709,855

Est. Cost:Applications: 97GRAND TOTAL

22,709,855

Page 4 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 1:43:25PM7/07/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: All Records

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/06/2009 to 30/06/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

234.2/2000 Single Storey Dwelling 240,0001 Parker ST FAIRFIELDMr M Petrusevic Approved - Delegated Authority18/06/2009

289.3/2006 Business Premises 0239 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSValore Holdings Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

502.1/2006 Granny Flat 70,000140 Mimosa RD BOSSLEY PARKMr S Kivarkis0502/2006DA DA Determination - Surrendered23/06/2009

1127.2/2006 Two Storey Dwelling 285,000107 Shakespeare ST WETHERILL PARKN Askarya Approved - Delegated Authority09/06/2009

10215.1/2006 Granny Flat 70,000140 Mimosa RD BOSSLEY PARKMr S Kivarkis0215/2006CC CC Determination - Withdrawn23/06/2009

1036.2/2007 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 80,0001 Willmot ST BOSSLEY PARKMr Z Gaspi Approved - Delegated Authority01/06/2009

1198.1/2007 Commercial/Residential Development 18,000,0001 Villawood PL VILLAWOODRyleton Pty Ltd1198/2007DA Approved - Delegated Authority04/06/2009

10251.1/2007 Duplex 360,0002 Rossiter ST SMITHFIELDMr U Morvillo0251/2007CC Approved - Delegated Authority16/06/2009

49.3/2008 Refreshment Room 210,0008 Alan ST FAIRFIELDRamakers Architects Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority19/06/2009

245.2/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 25,0001 Ainsworth CRES WETHERILL PARKMrs S Daniel Approved - Delegated Authority02/06/2009

1005.2/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 350,000102 High ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr B Elmoury Approved - Delegated Authority19/06/2009

1109.2/2008 Industry 049-53 Newton RD WETHERILL PARKFDC Construction & Fitout Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/06/2009

1109.3/2008 Industry 049-53 Newton RD WETHERILL PARKFDC Construction & Fitout Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority22/06/2009

1284.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 397,0001 Stanley ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMrs ZH Manche DA Determination - Withdrawn01/06/2009

1300.1/2008 Warehouse 43,00010 Longfield ST CABRAMATTAMr HV Canh Refused - Delegated Authority16/06/2009

1429.2/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 441,375121 Arbutus ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMs NA Ngo Approved - Delegated Authority22/06/2009

1688.2/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 263,000136 Broomfield ST CABRAMATTAMrs HL Ly Approved - Delegated Authority01/06/2009

1696.1/2008 Commercial Building 222,7001 Alan ST FAIRFIELDMr K David Refused - Delegated Authority16/06/2009

1872.1/2008 Single Storey Dwelling 277,00065-69 Jamieson CL HORSLEY PARKMrs P Vella Approved - Delegated Authority15/06/2009

1885.2/2008 Fence 8,0008 Wyatt CL WETHERILL PARKMr DEV Jackson Approved - Delegated Authority02/06/2009

1906.2/2008 Warehouse 025 Fairfield ST FAIRFIELD EASTPaul Rolfe Consulting Pty Ltd MA Determination - Withdrawn12/06/2009

1913.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 230,00043 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMrs T V Lam Approved - Delegated Authority12/06/2009

1929.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 256,23138 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMs T D Tran DA Determination - Surrendered10/06/2009

1957.1/2008 Commercial Building 650,000121-123 Cowpasture RD WETHERILL PARKClassic Frosted Glass Pty Ltd DA Determination - Withdrawn23/06/2009

1979.1/2008 Two Storey Dwelling 197,00039 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEWestminster Homes Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority22/06/2009

6.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 170,00013 Telford PL PRAIRIEWOODMr D Konjevic Section 82A Determination - Refusal24/06/2009

67.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 185,00080 Lansdowne RD CANLEY VALEMr TP Nguyen Section 82A Determination - Refusal02/06/2009

68.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 183,00014 Currey PL FAIRFIELD WESTMr N Isaac Approved - Delegated Authority09/06/2009

92.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 15,000110 McBurney RD CABRAMATTATran & Truong Residential Property Pty Ltd Refused - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

117.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 265,00049 Satara AVE CABRAMATTA WESTMs S Marm Approved - Delegated Authority09/06/2009

138.1/2009 Shop 7,0001 Villawood PL VILLAWOODMrs H C Ma Approved - Delegated Authority16/06/2009

156.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 135,0003 Lovoni ST CABRAMATTAMr C Huynh Section 82A Determination - Refusal02/06/2009

Page 1 of 5

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 1:44:12PM7/07/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: All Records

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/06/2009 to 30/06/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

183.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 205,0003 Ryan AVE CABRAMATTAFirststyle Homes Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority12/06/2009

232.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 038 Vine ST FAIRFIELDJohn B Stephen & Assoc Approved - Delegated Authority19/06/2009

240.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 298,18365 Madeline ST FAIRFIELD WESTMr BM Chang Approved - Delegated Authority22/06/2009

251.1/2009 Sign/s 168,36428 Bonnyrigg AVE BONNYRIGGBecton Property Group DA Determination - Withdrawn01/06/2009

262.1/2009 Outbuilding 11,80530 Crayford CRES MT PRITCHARDPatioland Parramatta Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority01/06/2009

271.1/2009 Commercial Building 734,678154-158 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSUrban Style Design Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority09/06/2009

274.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 430,5003-4 Rigney CL CECIL PARKMrs K Bonello Approved - Delegated Authority05/06/2009

289.1/2009 Demolition 2,000106 Knight ST LANSVALEMr VH Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority10/06/2009

296.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 0431 Elizabeth DR BONNYRIGGState Property Authority DA Determination - Surrendered02/06/2009

311.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 188,00014 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMs T Quach Approved - Delegated Authority09/06/2009

312.1/2009 Shop 3,00074 Thorney RD FAIRFIELD WESTMr K Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

318.2/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 35,00029 Alt ST SMITHFIELDMr D Naidu Approved - Delegated Authority02/06/2009

329.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 185,570382A Elizabeth DR MT PRITCHARDMr J Gioffre Approved - Delegated Authority15/06/2009

331.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 271,7425 Abercrombie ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr HT Vo Approved - Delegated Authority09/06/2009

332.1/2009 Ceremony 0104 Smithfield RD SMITHFIELDCancer Council Approved - Delegated Authority17/06/2009

340.1/2009 Outbuilding 12,000111-115 Arundel RD HORSLEY PARKTsang & Lee Architects Pty Lyd Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

342.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 210,61122A Premier ST CANLEY VALEEagles Homes Approved - Delegated Authority10/06/2009

343.1/2009 Industry 545,000400 Victoria ST WETHERILL PARKAlbert Spiess Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority09/06/2009

347.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,00026 Benghazi ST BOSSLEY PARKMr F Sergi Refused - Delegated Authority09/06/2009

349.1/2009 Granny Flat 50,000101 Station ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr M Brikha Refused - Delegated Authority24/06/2009

350.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 0714 The Horsley DR SMITHFIELDMs DP Fenech Approved - Delegated Authority01/06/2009

352.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 90,00019 Gwandalan RD EDENSOR PARKMr AJ Munari Approved - Delegated Authority02/06/2009

358.1/2009 Home Business-Beauty Salon 25,000580 Smithfield RD PRAIRIEWOODMr M Grasso Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

366.1/2009 Outbuilding 17,00020 Loloma ST CABRAMATTAMs TP La Refused - Delegated Authority15/06/2009

369.1/2009 Industry 150,00025/1 Cowpasture PL WETHERILL PARKMr M Jajou Approved - Delegated Authority05/06/2009

370.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 11,5003 Woodlands AVE BOSSLEY PARKMr KT Lam Refused - Delegated Authority04/06/2009

372.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 139,0007A Liverpool ST CABRAMATTATimberline Homes Approved - Delegated Authority12/06/2009

378.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 270,0005 Dalmatia ST CARRAMARMrs LHT Ngo Approved - Delegated Authority16/06/2009

389.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 420,00025 Roebuck ST CABRAMATTAMr VO Nguyen Refused - Delegated Authority02/06/2009

390.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 0211-217 North Liverpool RD BONNYRIGGDevelopment Approval Managers Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority05/06/2009

396.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 72,00021 Karoon AVE CANLEY HEIGHTSMr D Hong Approved - Delegated Authority02/06/2009

398.1/2009 Refreshment Room 25,0001/44 Park RD CABRAMATTAMr KT Tek Approved - Delegated Authority03/06/2009

Page 2 of 5

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 1:44:12PM7/07/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: All Records

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/06/2009 to 30/06/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

399.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 12,00040 Galton ST WETHERILL PARKMr M Karlo Approved - Delegated Authority16/06/2009

401.1/2009 Shop 2,500102 John ST CABRAMATTATop Harvest Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority26/06/2009

403.1/2009 Business Premises 2,500102 John ST CABRAMATTATop Harvest Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority26/06/2009

406.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 034 Joyce ST FAIRFIELDAlma Engineers Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority30/06/2009

407.1/2009 Outbuilding 10,0007 Driscoll ST ABBOTSBURYMrs CT Henson DA Determination - Withdrawn09/06/2009

410.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 3,0002 Hillend PL WAKELEYMrs L Piper Approved - Delegated Authority10/06/2009

413.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 16,235152 Quarry RD BOSSLEY PARKMr AB Shamoon Approved - Delegated Authority24/06/2009

416.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 85,0008 Blaxland ST YENNORAMr B Al Reziq Approved - Delegated Authority02/06/2009

417.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 550,0005 Withers PL ABBOTSBURYMr S Yazbeck Approved - Delegated Authority04/06/2009

419.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 310,0004 Macarthur ST FAIRFIELD EASTMerkorious Construction Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority10/06/2009

420.1/2009 Outbuilding 10,10047 Brown ST SMITHFIELDMrs L Schultz Approved - Delegated Authority16/06/2009

421.1/2009 Community Event 0646-656 Woodville RD OLD GUILDFORDMr K W Foulstone Approved - Delegated Authority04/06/2009

423.1/2009 Demolition 11,0004 Whyalla CL WAKELEYMr JB Dela-Cruz DA Determination - Surrendered01/06/2009

424.1/2009 Demolition 11,00038 Hardy ST FAIRFIELDThe Regd Prop Of Strata Plan 12099 Approved - Delegated Authority12/06/2009

425.1/2009 Shop 75,000561-583 Polding ST PRAIRIEWOODDesigncorp Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/06/2009

431.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 07 Enterprise PL WETHERILL PARKBritten & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/06/2009

434.1/2009 Industry 7,0008 Cavasinni PL WETHERILL PARKTri Distributors Aust Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority01/06/2009

436.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 50,00044 Alick ST CABRAMATTAMr D Dimic Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

438.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 220,00091A Kalang RD EDENSOR PARKMrs R Oraham Approved - Delegated Authority09/06/2009

442.1/2009 Granny Flat 70,00013 Orchardleigh ST YENNORAMerkorious Construction Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority17/06/2009

443.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 700,00085-101 Horsley RD HORSLEY PARKMr N Naamo Approved - Delegated Authority26/06/2009

444.1/2009 Granny Flat 45,00028 Crosby CRES FAIRFIELDMr J Manning Approved - Delegated Authority10/06/2009

449.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 195,0006 Lisa CRES BONNYRIGGCSB NSW Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority05/06/2009

450.1/2009 Medical Centre 40,0001/118 Ware ST FAIRFIELDDr Sadek Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority17/06/2009

453.1/2009 Fence 9,80079 Torrens ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr LB Wu Approved - Delegated Authority10/06/2009

454.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 223,00039 Middlehope ST BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSTrevelle Homes Approved - Delegated Authority10/06/2009

455.1/2009 Shop 2,500692 The Horsley DR SMITHFIELDDvyne Design & Construction Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority30/06/2009

456.1/2009 Shop 20,000200-202 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSDynamite Beauty Salon Approved - Delegated Authority24/06/2009

458.1/2009 Water Tank 45,00075 Edensor RD ST JOHNS PARKBluescope Water Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority24/06/2009

463.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 470,000290 Lincoln RD HORSLEY PARKPro Corp Designs DA Determination - Withdrawn29/06/2009

468.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 109,0005 Richmond CL ST JOHNS PARKMrs R B Sadiq Approved - Delegated Authority16/06/2009

472.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 50,00034 Moir ST SMITHFIELDMrs RH Abikhalil Approved - Delegated Authority09/06/2009

Page 3 of 5

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 1:44:12PM7/07/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: All Records

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/06/2009 to 30/06/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

473.1/2009 Outbuilding 11,00013 Swanley ST MT PRITCHARDMr M Novkovic Approved - Delegated Authority04/06/2009

476.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 0431 Elizabeth DR BONNYRIGGState Property Authority Approved - Delegated Authority10/06/2009

478.1/2009 Aerated Septic Tank 0295-309 Chandos RD HORSLEY PARKP & J Plumbing Complete11/06/2009

479.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,5002/23 Cartwright ST BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMs V Pereira Approved - Delegated Authority02/06/2009

480.1/2009 Warehouse 050 Redfern ST WETHERILL PARKGlen Cameron Nominees Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/06/2009

481.1/2009 Demolition 7,700124 The Horsley DR CARRAMARFowler Homes Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority17/06/2009

484.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 48,00030 Begovich CRES ABBOTSBURYMr A Mirabilio DA Determination - Withdrawn12/06/2009

492.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 680,00032 Church ST CABRAMATTAAdvan Developments Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/06/2009

493.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 45,00025 Power ST PRAIRIEWOODMr G Morabito Approved - Delegated Authority11/06/2009

499.1/2009 Demolition 9,0003 Lang ST SMITHFIELDMr J Urdanegui Approved - Delegated Authority10/06/2009

510.1/2009 Shop 50,0004/85 John ST CABRAMATTAJ K & L Construction Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority24/06/2009

513.1/2009 Outbuilding 7,5004 Echuca CL BONNYRIGGMr R Prtenjak Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

515.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,9002 Lidell PL BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSCustomline Carports Approved - Delegated Authority11/06/2009

516.1/2009 Outbuilding 5,00010 Alvisio CL EDENSOR PARKMrs F Siracusa Approved - Delegated Authority10/06/2009

517.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,0002 Gazi CL BOSSLEY PARKMr AR Miranda Approved - Delegated Authority16/06/2009

520.1/2009 Outbuilding 16,0007 Mimosa RD BOSSLEY PARKSunscreen Patios & Pergolas Approved - Delegated Authority29/06/2009

523.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,0002 Patricia AVE MT PRITCHARDAustek Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority12/06/2009

527.1/2009 Demolition 5,00023 Gardiner CRES FAIRFIELD WESTMrs P Badoyan Approved - Delegated Authority12/06/2009

528.1/2009 Outbuilding 7,0008 Pope PL FAIRFIELD WESTMrs C Occhiuto Approved - Delegated Authority24/06/2009

529.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,00024 Tuncurry ST BOSSLEY PARKMr BJ Maher Approved - Delegated Authority11/06/2009

535.1/2009 Demolition 7,500251 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMr J C Green Approved - Delegated Authority24/06/2009

536.1/2009 Demolition 0108-108A Harris ST FAIRFIELDMr KA Kathmi Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

537.1/2009 Granny Flat 38,00042 Tangerine ST FAIRFIELD EASTMrs HHT Tran Approved - Delegated Authority12/06/2009

538.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 3,5007 Oliphant ST MT PRITCHARDMs ML Bui Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

542.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 7,00011 Keesing ST EDENSOR PARKWizard Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

544.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 35,00011 Frome ST FAIRFIELD WESTWizard Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority17/06/2009

545.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 5,0008 Wyalong CL WAKELEYJNL Home Improvement Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority24/06/2009

548.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 9,0004 Whyalla CL WAKELEYMr JB Dela-Cruz Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

553.1/2009 Demolition 7,00022A Premier ST CANLEY VALEMs C S Jorquera Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

556.1/2009 Demolition 010 Brown ST SMITHFIELDFocus Homes Approved - Delegated Authority16/06/2009

559.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,00016 Richmond CL ST JOHNS PARKMr HD Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

564.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 25,00064 Vidal ST WETHERILL PARKMr Z Brasnovic Approved - Delegated Authority29/06/2009

Page 4 of 5

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 1:44:12PM7/07/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: All Records

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/06/2009 to 30/06/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

574.1/2009 Festival 016 Kamira AVE VILLAWOODWoodville Community Services Approved - Delegated Authority24/06/2009

580.1/2009 Fence 6,00098 Cumberland ST CABRAMATTAMr P Huynh Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

581.1/2009 Festival 0223-227 Edensor RD EDENSOR PARKKing Tomislav Croation Club Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority25/06/2009

606.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 50,00024 Kindee AVE BONNYRIGGMr S Petrovsky Approved - Delegated Authority29/06/2009

607.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,00045 Garland CRES BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr VK Tran Approved - Delegated Authority30/06/2009

Total Development Applications Applications: 133 Est. Cost: 32,693,494

Est. Cost:Applications: 133GRAND TOTAL

32,693,494

Page 5 of 5

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 4:10:57PM10/08/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/07/2009 to 31/07/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

19.1/2005 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 18,00037 Marley CRES BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr B Tankhounthavong0019/2005DA DA Determination - Withdrawn10/07/2009

1238.1/2007 Single Storey Dwelling 201,316102 Sweethaven RD GREENFIELD PARKMr Nguyen1238/2007DA DA Determination - Surrendered28/07/2009

1027.1/2008 Shopping Centre 56,616,887100 Bonnyrigg AVE BONNYRIGGShopping Centre Management Pty Ltd Approved - Council08/07/2009

1665.1/2008 Shopping Centre 50,000100 Bonnyrigg AVE BONNYRIGGHamptons Planning Approved - Delegated Authority20/07/2009

1671.1/2008 Car Yard 12,000248 Hume HWY LANSVALEGlobal Reliance Pty Ltd Refused - Delegated Authority07/07/2009

1942.1/2008 Commercial Building 986,00046 Hill ST CABRAMATTATranspacific Group Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority09/07/2009

97.1/2009 Service Station 703,000678 The Horsley DR SMITHFIELDSinclair Knight Merz Approved - Delegated Authority27/07/2009

131.1/2009 Commercial Building 250,000239 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSTiger One Investment Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

146.1/2009 Residential Flat Building 2,200,00015 Cunninghame ST FAIRFIELDVTC Holdings Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority09/07/2009

165.1/2009 Home Business-Clothing 20,00044 Treloar PL EDENSOR PARKMiss T Khamo DA Determination - Withdrawn24/07/2009

213.1/2009 Granny Flat 37,000101 Harris ST FAIRFIELDMiss C L Quan Approved - Delegated Authority06/07/2009

231.1/2009 Shop 15,0005 Lansdowne RD CANLEY VALEMs KN Tran Approved - Delegated Authority02/07/2009

250.1/2009 Shop 044 Court RD FAIRFIELDMr W Hermiz DA Determination - Withdrawn24/07/2009

269.1/2009 Sign/s 3,000223-227 Edensor RD EDENSOR PARKSignmanager DA Determination - Withdrawn03/07/2009

288.1/2009 Carpark 50,00022-30 Mansfield ST WETHERILL PARKAustralasian Conference Assoc Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority02/07/2009

324.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 188,00069 Madeline ST FAIRFIELD WESTAntworks Design Approved - Delegated Authority06/07/2009

328.1/2009 Granny Flat 62,30053 Lansdowne RD CANLEY VALET N Constructions Pty Ltd Section 82A Determination - Refusal07/07/2009

334.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 35,00023 Wilga ST FAIRFIELDCondor Design Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority01/07/2009

347.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,00026 Benghazi ST BOSSLEY PARKMr F Sergi Approved - Delegated Authority15/07/2009

357.1/2009 Bulky Goods/Showroom 20,00012 Lagana PL WETHERILL PARKC C Weston & Assoc Approved - Delegated Authority27/07/2009

359.1/2009 Carpark 15,0002-4 Villawood RD VILLAWOODMr V Nudler Approved - Delegated Authority20/07/2009

367.1/2009 Sign/s 25,000561-583 Polding ST PRAIRIEWOODYum! Restaurants Aust Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority02/07/2009

377.1/2009 Shop 38,00024-32 Hughes ST CABRAMATTALu Projects Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority02/07/2009

391.1/2009 Home Business-Food 3,00013 Chavin PL GREENFIELD PARKMrs T Kargar DA Determination - Withdrawn24/07/2009

394.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 202,14628 Beckenham ST CANLEY VALEMiss T T B Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority08/07/2009

395.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 48,0002 Stuart ST CANLEY VALEMr D Cammareri Approved - Delegated Authority22/07/2009

409.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 312,00059 Marlborough ST SMITHFIELDD Dimaria Approved - Delegated Authority15/07/2009

412.1/2009 Shop 4,000239 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMr J T Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority06/07/2009

418.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 306,500194 Brenan ST SMITHFIELDFocus Homes Approved - Delegated Authority07/07/2009

422.1/2009 Home Business-Hairdressing 016 Holdin ST BONNYRIGGMrs PF Lim Approved - Delegated Authority02/07/2009

429.1/2009 Shop 100,000100 Bonnyrigg AVE BONNYRIGGRetail Food Group Approved - Delegated Authority09/07/2009

432.1/2009 Warehouse 0130 Newton RD WETHERILL PARKFive Star Quality Products Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority02/07/2009

Page 1 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 4:11:45PM10/08/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/07/2009 to 31/07/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

433.1/2009 Granny Flat 40,95032 Bligh ST VILLAWOODEagle Homes Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

437.1/2009 Auto Dismantler 072 Railway ST YENNORAAuto Ice Parts Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority06/07/2009

462.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 48,00019 McCarthy ST FAIRFIELD WESTMr D Backo Approved - Delegated Authority15/07/2009

464.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 437,00019 Lord ST CABRAMATTA WESTMs TM Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority13/07/2009

465.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,000130-136 Lincoln RD HORSLEY PARKMr F Rizzuti Approved - Delegated Authority13/07/2009

467.1/2009 Home Business-Office 3,000123-143 Horsley RD HORSLEY PARKMr D Cece Approved - Delegated Authority02/07/2009

470.1/2009 Shop 20,0001/81 John ST CABRAMATTANguyen & Luu Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority01/07/2009

477.1/2009 Fence 16,000103 Lord ST CABRAMATTA WESTVinh Nguyen Bros & Assoc Approved - Delegated Authority01/07/2009

485.1/2009 Granny Flat 86,00088 Henry ST OLD GUILDFORDDe'Bonnaire Designz Approved - Delegated Authority13/07/2009

486.1/2009 Outbuilding 7,00036 Silverwater CRES LANSVALEMr JW Webster Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

487.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 357,0003-7 Woodstock ST ST JOHNS PARKEssential Planning Approved - Delegated Authority08/07/2009

488.1/2009 Shop 5,0002/50 Park RD CABRAMATTAMr N Li Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

496.1/2009 Office Fitout 10,900239 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMr V Pham Approved - Delegated Authority06/07/2009

498.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 200,0008 Morven ST OLD GUILDFORDMr R Skhale Approved - Delegated Authority08/07/2009

503.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 45,00042 Malta ST FAIRFIELD EASTMr MA EL-Kheir DA Determination - Withdrawn16/07/2009

507.1/2009 Shop 12,000134 Edensor RD BONNYRIGGSupplements 101 Approved - Delegated Authority10/07/2009

508.1/2009 Granny Flat 55,0001 Marlborough ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSEvalesco Construtction Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority01/07/2009

509.1/2009 Outbuilding 7,00017 Rhondda ST SMITHFIELDMr N B Jenkins Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

511.1/2009 Shop 1,00033 Hamel RD MT PRITCHARDMr S V Chour Approved - Delegated Authority07/07/2009

514.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 333,7005 Lord ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr A Luu Approved - Delegated Authority06/07/2009

518.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 224,25023 Gardiner CRES FAIRFIELD WESTCasaview Constructions Approved - Delegated Authority27/07/2009

521.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 232,0002 Beckenham ST CANLEY VALEMr M Romic Approved - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

524.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 055 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTFairfield City Council Approved - Delegated Authority01/07/2009

525.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 105,00040 Andrew AVE CANLEY HEIGHTSMr TS Ngo Approved - Delegated Authority06/07/2009

526.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 80,00043 Derby ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr J Huynh Approved - Delegated Authority13/07/2009

533.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 300,00012 Veron ST FAIRFIELDMr TT Mai Approved - Delegated Authority13/07/2009

541.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 45,00027 Phyllis ST MT PRITCHARDMr I Vittozzi Approved - Delegated Authority28/07/2009

543.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 205,00022A Stimson ST SMITHFIELDMr M M Antic Approved - Delegated Authority22/07/2009

551.1/2009 Home Business-Clothing 3,0004 Somers ST BONNYRIGGMr BL Nguyen DA Determination - Withdrawn24/07/2009

555.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 270,00017 Hiland CRES SMITHFIELDMr R Sullo Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

560.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 20,00036A Avonlea ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr T Nassrat Approved - Delegated Authority27/07/2009

562.1/2009 Business Premises 07/41-47 Spencer ST FAIRFIELDMs T R Stevens Approved - Delegated Authority28/07/2009

Page 2 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 4:11:45PM10/08/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/07/2009 to 31/07/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

565.1/2009 Shop 5,00081 Broughton ST OLD GUILDFORDMr O Taleb Approved - Delegated Authority16/07/2009

568.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 354,0433 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTMiss THT Vu Approved - Delegated Authority13/07/2009

570.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 259,61552 Smiths AVE CABRAMATTAClarendon Homes Approved - Delegated Authority27/07/2009

577.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 6,0007 Katrina CRES CABRAMATTA WESTMr D Tran Approved - Delegated Authority27/07/2009

582.1/2009 Outbuilding 12,00034 Derby ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr VK Do Approved - Delegated Authority15/07/2009

583.1/2009 Shop 75,0001-29 Court RD FAIRFIELDNextspace Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/07/2009

585.1/2009 Granny Flat 35,000104 Lansdowne RD CANLEY VALEMr C Tang Refused - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

586.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 243,00086 Hemphill AVE MT PRITCHARDMr I Kukic Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

587.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 11,30016 Brahma CL BOSSLEY PARKMs C Huynh Approved - Delegated Authority15/07/2009

588.1/2009 Fence 11,00013 Bainton RD MT PRITCHARDMr D Gajic Approved - Delegated Authority13/07/2009

590.1/2009 Public Recreation Facility 022 Neville ST SMITHFIELDMr DC Petalas Approved - Delegated Authority06/07/2009

591.1/2009 Fence 9,00025 Alt ST SMITHFIELDAlma Engineers Pty Ltd DA Determination - Withdrawn10/07/2009

592.1/2009 Fence 9,00013 Chisholm ST SMITHFIELDAlma Engineers Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority01/07/2009

593.1/2009 Shop 30,0002/49 Smart ST FAIRFIELDMrs L M Vo Approved - Delegated Authority16/07/2009

594.1/2009 Shop 1,00037 John ST CABRAMATTALingling Manchester Approved - Delegated Authority15/07/2009

595.1/2009 Demolition 7,000166 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMs S K Wu Approved - Delegated Authority01/07/2009

598.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 65,00024 Corry ST BONNYRIGGMr D Miladinovic Approved - Delegated Authority23/07/2009

599.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 229,0002 Throsby ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr G Haddad Approved - Delegated Authority22/07/2009

601.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,00075 Belmore ST FAIRFIELD EASTMr Z Wehbeh Approved - Delegated Authority07/07/2009

602.1/2009 Granny Flat 25,00083 Whitaker ST OLD GUILDFORDMr B Kanj DA Determination - Withdrawn21/07/2009

605.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 010-12 Oxford ST SMITHFIELDProject Surveyors Approved - Delegated Authority20/07/2009

613.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 80,000144 Fairfield ST FAIRFIELDMr C To Approved - Delegated Authority28/07/2009

614.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,00011 Esmond PL WAKELEYMr AA Khilla Approved - Delegated Authority01/07/2009

615.1/2009 Demolition 8,00015 Senior ST CANLEY VALEMrs MS Sivieng Approved - Delegated Authority06/07/2009

616.1/2009 Demolition 7,00051 Arbutus ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr BH Truong Approved - Delegated Authority06/07/2009

617.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 230,00030 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEMr M Faraj Approved - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

618.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 250,00041 Marley CRES BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr A Helmy Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

619.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 19,00011 Laycock PL BONNYRIGGMr V M Phan Approved - Delegated Authority16/07/2009

628.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 125,00054 Galton ST WETHERILL PARKMr J G Tolomeo Approved - Delegated Authority27/07/2009

633.1/2009 Demolition 8,0005 Dalmatia ST CARRAMARMrs LHT Ngo Approved - Delegated Authority13/07/2009

635.1/2009 Outbuilding 2,5008 Glenton ST ABBOTSBURYMr AN Karroum Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

643.1/2009 Demolition 26,00016 Fisher ST CABRAMATTAFairfield City Council Approved - Delegated Authority13/07/2009

Page 3 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 4:11:45PM10/08/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/07/2009 to 31/07/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

644.1/2009 Outbuilding 1,00043 Orchardleigh ST YENNORAMr J Jabbour Approved - Delegated Authority21/07/2009

646.1/2009 Granny Flat 33,50016 Canterbury RD ST JOHNS PARKVinh Nguyen Bros & Assoc DA Determination - Withdrawn21/07/2009

648.1/2009 Demolition 8,00012 The Grove FAIRFIELDMr CC Ho Approved - Delegated Authority13/07/2009

649.1/2009 Medical Centre 50,00053 Mimosa RD BOSSLEY PARKArconn P/L (Trading as Perfect Practice) Approved - Delegated Authority20/07/2009

654.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 200,00012 Dublin ST SMITHFIELDMr G Georges Approved - Delegated Authority27/07/2009

656.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,5007-9 Longfellow ST WETHERILL PARKMr AR West Approved - Delegated Authority08/07/2009

657.1/2009 Outbuilding 1,0006 Boyd ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr SH Tain Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

660.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 6,00013 Orchardleigh ST YENNORAMerkorious Construction Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority27/07/2009

664.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,0005 Como PL ST JOHNS PARKMr VS Le Approved - Delegated Authority28/07/2009

666.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 60,00017 Broad ST CABRAMATTAMs T K Pham Approved - Delegated Authority14/07/2009

667.1/2009 Granny Flat 28,00039 Baragoola ST FAIRFIELD WESTVinh Nguyen Bros & Assoc Refused - Delegated Authority30/07/2009

669.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 81,00012 Ashgrove ST ST JOHNS PARKKarisma Building Services Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority21/07/2009

670.1/2009 Shop 15,00013/64 Ware ST FAIRFIELDMr Z Q Liang Approved - Delegated Authority21/07/2009

676.1/2009 Inground Pool 19,00033 Rafter CRES ABBOTSBURYSea Breeze Pools Approved - Delegated Authority20/07/2009

681.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 150,000579 Smithfield RD GREENFIELD PARKMrs D Foti Approved - Delegated Authority23/07/2009

682.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 10,0002D Knight ST LANSVALEMr P Gibbs Approved - Delegated Authority15/07/2009

690.1/2009 Granny Flat 28,00014 Chelsea DR CANLEY HEIGHTSVinh Nguyen Bros & Assoc Refused - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

709.1/2009 Demolition 7,0004 Percy ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr A Emami Approved - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

711.1/2009 Demolition 4,598144-154 Cowpasture RD WETHERILL PARKWestern Sydney Parklands Trust Approved - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

712.1/2009 Inground Pool 30,0006 Maxwell PL ABBOTSBURYLocal Pools Spas Approved - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

713.1/2009 Outbuilding 21,7505 Horn CL ABBOTSBURYRanbuild Sydney Approved - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

714.1/2009 Demolition 8,0005 Lord ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr A N Luu Approved - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

722.1/2009 Demolition 9,00021 Bauer RD CABRAMATTA WESTMr LJ Varcoe Approved - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

728.1/2009 Demolition 8,500121 Campbell ST FAIRFIELD EASTEcodemo & Construction Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority29/07/2009

734.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,50016 Yalumba PL EDENSOR PARKMr D Luu Approved - Delegated Authority30/07/2009

Total Development Applications Applications: 121 Est. Cost: 68,655,755

Est. Cost:Applications: 121GRAND TOTAL

68,655,755

Page 4 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:58:27AM7/09/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/08/2009 to 31/08/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

957.1/2007 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 100,00021 Tallowood CRES BOSSLEY PARKWal Robbins Additions Pty Ltd0957/2007DA DA Determination - Surrendered14/08/2009

1286.1/2008 Service Station 48,000472 Cabramatta RDW MT PRITCHARDMr B Lopreiato Approved - Delegated Authority11/08/2009

1953.1/2008 Triplex 398,000305 Polding ST FAIRFIELD WESTPetra Development Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/08/2009

87.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 180,0003 Mackenzie ST CANLEY VALEMs HA Page Refused - Delegated Authority07/08/2009

122.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 07-11 Calmsley PL HORSLEY PARKBritten & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/08/2009

175.1/2009 Refreshment Room 01824-1830 The Horsley DR HORSLEY PARKMr R Borg DA Determination - Withdrawn17/08/2009

192.1/2009 Industry 01/1345 The Horsley DR WETHERILL PARKMr C J Wood Approved - Delegated Authority06/08/2009

201.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 585,240344-346 Horsley RD HORSLEY PARKStarr Constructions Pty Limited Approved - Delegated Authority18/08/2009

254.1/2009 Shop 30,00030 Broomfield ST CABRAMATTAMr T Thai Approved - Delegated Authority14/08/2009

259.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 225,0009A Urunga PL BOSSLEY PARKMr EZ Filipic Approved - Delegated Authority06/08/2009

264.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 10,000155 Newton RD WETHERILL PARKEcocycle Materials Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority20/08/2009

265.1/2009 Warehouse 4,751,610379 Victoria ST WETHERILL PARKAustralian Postal Corp Approved - Delegated Authority31/08/2009

308.1/2009 Granny Flat 40,000105 Cumberland ST CABRAMATTAMr P Chau Section 82A Determination - Refusal05/08/2009

314.1/2009 Health Consulting Room/s and Residence 4,000130 Restwell RD BOSSLEY PARKPresidential Land & Maritime Management Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority10/08/2009

322.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 180,615326A Elizabeth DR MT PRITCHARDEagle Homes Approved - Delegated Authority17/08/2009

327.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 11,00022 Riverside RD LANSVALEMr GW Crouch Approved - Delegated Authority19/08/2009

341.1/2009 Granny Flat 50,00013 Hampton ST FAIRFIELDMs MA Radice Approved - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

349.1/2009 Granny Flat 100,000101 Station ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr M Brikha Approved - Delegated Authority12/08/2009

355.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 516,00010 Brown ST SMITHFIELDFocus Homes Approved - Delegated Authority25/08/2009

371.1/2009 Commercial Building 60,000239 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMrs N Spasojevic Approved - Delegated Authority04/08/2009

373.1/2009 Vehicle Repair Workshop/Station 5,00048 Whitaker ST YENNORAMister 350Z Smash Repairs Refused - Delegated Authority11/08/2009

435.1/2009 Home Business-Hairdressing 5,00021 Young ST MT PRITCHARDMr VN Tran Approved - Delegated Authority26/08/2009

439.1/2009 Club 29,000121 Prairie Vale RD BOSSLEY PARKNew Era Design Approved - Delegated Authority17/08/2009

451.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 045-53 Selkirk AVE CECIL PARKFairfield Consulting Services Approved - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

452.1/2009 Sign/s 35,00082 Longfield ST CABRAMATTACabramatta Bowling & Recreation Club Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/08/2009

457.1/2009 Outbuilding 35,000281-287 Delaware RD HORSLEY PARKHabitation Design & Interiors Approved - Delegated Authority18/08/2009

471.1/2009 Outbuilding 6,000204 Neville ST SMITHFIELDJNL Home Improvement Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority28/08/2009

475.1/2009 Warehouse 021/19-26 Durian PL WETHERILL PARKOn Time Freight Management Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority10/08/2009

482.1/2009 Shop 15,00046 Hamilton RD FAIRFIELDMrs L Mrouki Approved - Delegated Authority13/08/2009

497.1/2009 Land Fill 05 Washington WAY CECIL PARKMr Y Adams Refused - Delegated Authority05/08/2009

500.1/2009 Refreshment Room 50,000239 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMrs T B V Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority18/08/2009

501.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 179,000454 The Horsley DR FAIRFIELDEden Brae Homes Approved - Delegated Authority07/08/2009

Page 1 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:59:12AM7/09/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/08/2009 to 31/08/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

504.1/2009 Fence 10,000753 The Horsley DR SMITHFIELDMr JC Vacopoulos Refused - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

512.1/2009 Warehouse 06/19-26 Durian PL WETHERILL PARKAuto Ingress Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority10/08/2009

534.1/2009 Shop 850,000561-583 Polding ST PRAIRIEWOODFranklins Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/08/2009

547.1/2009 Granny Flat 33,00021 Morna ST GREENFIELD PARKMr TN Vuong Refused - Delegated Authority06/08/2009

552.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 257,98712 The Grove FAIRFIELDMs C Q Ho Approved - Delegated Authority11/08/2009

554.1/2009 Festival 0610 Elizabeth DR BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSBonnyrigg Sports Club Approved - Delegated Authority10/08/2009

571.1/2009 Warehouse 35,00017/19-26 Durian PL WETHERILL PARKT Too Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority10/08/2009

584.1/2009 Health Consulting Room/s 0195 Cabramatta RDW CABRAMATTAMs Y C Zhao Approved - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

589.1/2009 Shop 20,0008/105 John ST CABRAMATTAMr Q L So Approved - Delegated Authority12/08/2009

597.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,00065 Whitaker ST OLD GUILDFORDMrs L Schultz Approved - Delegated Authority07/08/2009

600.1/2009 Industry 050 Chadderton ST CABRAMATTATina Vo Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority28/08/2009

604.1/2009 Medical Centre 15,000239 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr VC Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

610.1/2009 Footpath Trading 1,0005-9 Freedom PLZ CABRAMATTAOK Supermarket (Cabramatta) Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

620.1/2009 Vehicle Repair Workshop/Station 5,0002/245 Railway PDE CABRAMATTAMrs M Husar Approved - Delegated Authority17/08/2009

629.1/2009 Industry 70,0001/27 Davis RD WETHERILL PARKMr N Abbu Approved - Delegated Authority04/08/2009

630.1/2009 Medical Centre 200,000673 The Horsley DR SMITHFIELDD & R Architects Approved - Delegated Authority10/08/2009

631.1/2009 Shop 25,000151 Cabramatta RDE CABRAMATTAMr C F Phan Approved - Delegated Authority07/08/2009

641.1/2009 Office Fitout 30,000236 Canley Vale RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMr TH Lu Approved - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

652.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 220,0006 Maxwell PL ABBOTSBURYMr J Falzon Approved - Delegated Authority17/08/2009

653.1/2009 Commercial Building 100,0007 William ST FAIRFIELDPosh Homes Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/08/2009

661.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 90,00031 Rickard RD BOSSLEY PARKMrs N Tang Approved - Delegated Authority04/08/2009

663.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 218,0007 Murrumbidgee ST BOSSLEY PARKFirstyle Homes Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/08/2009

665.1/2009 Inground Pool 26,2501 Gambier ST BOSSLEY PARKMr SD Aziz Approved - Delegated Authority18/08/2009

672.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 42,0005 Wilcock ST CARRAMARMr HD Tran Approved - Delegated Authority19/08/2009

686.1/2009 Inground Pool 20,0005 Zuni CL BOSSLEY PARKMr S Alyas Approved - Delegated Authority07/08/2009

689.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 30,00013 Rachel CRES MT PRITCHARDMr F Sgro Approved - Delegated Authority05/08/2009

693.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 247,0953 Bernard PL EDENSOR PARKMr PC Stabile Approved - Delegated Authority04/08/2009

694.1/2009 Industry 0242 Hume HWY LANSVALEMr M Hajobeid Approved - Delegated Authority17/08/2009

700.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 297,2493 Stuart ST CANLEY VALEMr M Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority24/08/2009

703.1/2009 Warehouse 025/19-26 Durian PL WETHERILL PARKHi-Tech Metrology Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

706.1/2009 Outbuilding 20,00025 Brentwood ST FAIRFIELD WESTIndependent Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority24/08/2009

707.1/2009 Outbuilding 15,0002 Colville PL BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr G Dirou Approved - Delegated Authority12/08/2009

Page 2 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:59:12AM7/09/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/08/2009 to 31/08/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

716.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 280,000355 Polding ST FAIRFIELD WESTPerfection Building Services Approved - Delegated Authority11/08/2009

724.1/2009 Warehouse 07/19-26 Durian PL WETHERILL PARKActive Uniforms Approved - Delegated Authority07/08/2009

725.1/2009 Shop 1,500204 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSDelicia Empanadas & Deli Approved - Delegated Authority06/08/2009

727.1/2009 Granny Flat 35,00047A Chancery ST CANLEY VALEMrs TP Nguyen Refused - Delegated Authority17/08/2009

729.1/2009 Refreshment Room 52,00037 John ST CABRAMATTAMr A Giorgi DA Determination - Withdrawn05/08/2009

732.1/2009 Granny Flat 50,00023 Chelsea DR CANLEY HEIGHTSMrs TT Tran Approved - Delegated Authority19/08/2009

735.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 94,00018 Hampshire PL WAKELEYWal Robbins Additions Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority14/08/2009

738.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,00018/47 Mallacoota ST WAKELEYMrs D Filipello Approved - Delegated Authority18/08/2009

739.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,50033A Lime ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr V B Thiem Approved - Delegated Authority19/08/2009

741.1/2009 Demolition 10,00036 Booyong ST CABRAMATTAMr V S Chiu Approved - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

743.1/2009 Outbuilding 4,2004/8 Thesiger RD BONNYRIGGMr M Medic Approved - Delegated Authority08/08/2009

744.1/2009 Demolition 9,0008 Albert ST CABRAMATTAARK Health Care Enterprises Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

749.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,0002 Brahma CL BOSSLEY PARKMr AT Griffiths Approved - Delegated Authority26/08/2009

750.1/2009 Demolition 8,0003 Stuart ST CANLEY VALEMs C N Tong Approved - Delegated Authority07/08/2009

752.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 20,8004 Barker ST BOSSLEY PARKWizard Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority26/08/2009

753.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 340,00031 Garland CRES BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMs T Do Approved - Delegated Authority27/08/2009

756.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,000135 Selkirk AVE CECIL PARKTwinlite Awnings Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority12/08/2009

758.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,0003 Maugham CRES WETHERILL PARKMs T L A Do Approved - Delegated Authority18/08/2009

761.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 15,0008 Rosford ST SMITHFIELDMr T Solofoni Approved - Delegated Authority18/08/2009

762.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 4,8002 Rawson RD FAIRFIELD WESTMr M Tagliavento Approved - Delegated Authority03/08/2009

764.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 30,00026 Bougainville AVE BOSSLEY PARKMr PJ Fagan Approved - Delegated Authority12/08/2009

765.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 150,00021 Stivala PL BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMs P Lopategui Approved - Delegated Authority18/08/2009

770.1/2009 Fence 5,00040 Wyong ST CANLEY HEIGHTSLTD Thai Approved - Delegated Authority07/08/2009

778.1/2009 Demolition 12,00046 Anthony ST FAIRFIELDMr S Ignazzi Approved - Delegated Authority11/08/2009

779.1/2009 Outbuilding 19,00014B Gilbert ST CABRAMATTAWizard Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority24/08/2009

780.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 30,00016 Ryder RD GREENFIELD PARKMr E Jacob Approved - Delegated Authority26/08/2009

783.1/2009 Fence 10,00023 Ivanhoe ST ST JOHNS PARKMr J Vongsuthi Approved - Delegated Authority20/08/2009

792.1/2009 Outbuilding 10,00014 Rothbury ST EDENSOR PARKAtrak Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority18/08/2009

795.1/2009 Outbuilding 10,0003A Frederick ST FAIRFIELDMr H D Tran Approved - Delegated Authority12/08/2009

802.1/2009 Inground Pool 25,00010 Lisa CRES BONNYRIGGAdriatic Pools Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority21/08/2009

804.1/2009 Outbuilding 15,00017 The Avenue CANLEY VALEPatioland Parramatta Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority17/08/2009

822.1/2009 Outbuilding 2,0009A Stanbrook ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMs SA Toma Approved - Delegated Authority18/08/2009

Page 3 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:59:12AM7/09/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/08/2009 to 31/08/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

823.1/2009 Outbuilding 2,0009 Stanbrook ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr M Toma Approved - Delegated Authority19/08/2009

835.1/2009 Outbuilding 30,0008 Weeroona RD EDENSOR PARKMr GA Pavone Approved - Delegated Authority26/08/2009

836.1/2009 Outbuilding 9,50059 Curtin ST CABRAMATTAMiss T Giang Approved - Delegated Authority26/08/2009

837.1/2009 Outbuilding 5,00015 Noffs PL BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr PV Rodic Approved - Delegated Authority19/08/2009

843.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 150,00020 Bach PL BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSPetra Developments Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority26/08/2009

Total Development Applications Applications: 101 Est. Cost: 12,005,346

Est. Cost:Applications: 101GRAND TOTAL

12,005,346

Page 4 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:12:45AM2/10/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/09/2009 to 30/09/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

409.1/2006 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 25,00037 Castlereagh ST BOSSLEY PARKMr M Bello0409/2006DA DA Determination - Surrendered28/09/2009

516.1/2007 Subdivision Torrens 10,000522 Cabramatta RDW MT PRITCHARDMs S Nguyen0516/2007DA Refused - Delegated Authority24/09/2009

226.1/2008 Office Fitout 380,000176-180 Hume HWY LANSVALEHodges Shorten Architects Pty Ltd0226/2008DA Approved - Delegated Authority17/09/2009

268.1/2008 Commercial/Residential Development 250,00092 John ST CABRAMATTABongiorno Hawkins Frassetto & Assoc Pty Limited0268/2008DA Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

1161.1/2008 Duplex 250,00017 Salisbury ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr A Molluso Approved - Delegated Authority16/09/2009

1242.1/2008 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 91,270109 Smart ST FAIRFIELDES Engineering & Drafting DA Determination - Surrendered29/09/2009

1424.1/2008 Industry 071 Victoria ST SMITHFIELDCylinder Head Rebuilders Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority25/09/2009

1850.1/2008 Agriculture 231,000273 Lincoln RD HORSLEY PARKMr A Bagala Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

1885.1/2008 Fence 8,0008 Wyatt CL WETHERILL PARKMr DEV Jackson DA Determination - Surrendered15/09/2009

1944.1/2008 Industry 63013/1-3 Knight ST LANSVALEMr S Vongxayasy Approved - Delegated Authority07/09/2009

105.1/2009 Place Of Worship 20,00042 St Johns RD CABRAMATTAMr A Mamou Approved - Delegated Authority22/09/2009

127.1/2009 Commercial Building 27,673,800376 The Horsley DR FAIRFIELDOzsend 2 NSW Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/09/2009

176.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 95,00012A Polding ST FAIRFIELDMr A Mamou Approved - Delegated Authority03/09/2009

287.1/2009 Place Of Worship 3,000114 Broomfield ST CABRAMATTAKampuchea Krom Culture Centre of NSW Inc Approved - Delegated Authority22/09/2009

317.1/2009 Warehouse 08/1-3 Knight ST LANSVALET & H Group Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority09/09/2009

380.1/2009 Child Care Centre 20,000197 Edensor RD EDENSOR PARKAlkosh Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

385.1/2009 Office Fitout 950,00015 Elizabeth ST WETHERILL PARKGaintak Investment Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority17/09/2009

474.1/2009 Dual Occupancy-Detached 270,000615 The Horsley DR SMITHFIELDMr N Bisso Approved - Delegated Authority17/09/2009

506.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 285,000240 Hamilton RD FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSWisdom Homes Approved - Delegated Authority16/09/2009

519.1/2009 Industry 330,0008 Bentley ST WETHERILL PARKDem Holdings NSW Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority01/09/2009

561.1/2009 Home Business-Hairdressing 5,00026 Gardiner CRES FAIRFIELD WESTMr A Khodr Approved - Delegated Authority03/09/2009

566.1/2009 Warehouse 6,00090 Victoria ST SMITHFIELDLaxales Beauty & Hair Supplies Refused - Delegated Authority09/09/2009

575.1/2009 Granny Flat 40,00028 Bathurst ST WAKELEYMr I Toprak Refused - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

578.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 303,7001638 The Horsley DR HORSLEY PARKEden Brae Homes Approved - Delegated Authority09/09/2009

583.1/2009 Shop 75,0001-29 Court RD FAIRFIELDNextspace Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority28/09/2009

609.1/2009 Warehouse 023/19-26 Durian PL WETHERILL PARKHeat & Control Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority02/09/2009

612.1/2009 Shop 088 John ST CABRAMATTALisa Nguyen Nail Beauty & Tatoo Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority07/09/2009

622.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 120,00048 Katinka ST BONNYRIGGAdvance Building Solutions Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority11/09/2009

623.1/2009 Shop 01822 The Horsley DR HORSLEY PARKMr B W Bailey Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

627.1/2009 Refreshment Room 10,000164 The Boulevarde FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr F Betti Approved - Delegated Authority09/09/2009

636.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 250,0007 Presland CL LANSVALEMs Z Barbour Approved - Delegated Authority15/09/2009

642.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 300,00066-68 Arundel RD HORSLEY PARKScope Building Design Pty Ltd Refused - Delegated Authority29/09/2009

Page 1 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:13:34AM2/10/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/09/2009 to 30/09/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

645.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 379,5002 Hackett RD ABBOTSBURYMr H R Francis Approved - Delegated Authority23/09/2009

651.1/2009 Granny Flat 28,00073 Hercules ST FAIRFIELD EASTVinh Nguyen Bros & Assoc Refused - Delegated Authority02/09/2009

658.1/2009 Granny Flat 28,00022 Hillcrest AVE VILLAWOODVinh Nguyen Bros & Assoc Refused - Delegated Authority02/09/2009

674.1/2009 Granny Flat 34,00011 St Johns RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMs TMT Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority28/09/2009

691.1/2009 Shop 22,50029 Villawood PL VILLAWOODMrs D Lebbos Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

692.1/2009 Shopping Centre 100,000561-583 Polding ST PRAIRIEWOODLeffler Simes Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/09/2009

695.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 295,00062 Bold ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr T Sylaprany Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

697.1/2009 Outbuilding 45,000222-226 Cecil RD CECIL PARKRob Thomas Developments Refused - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

698.1/2009 Vehicle Repair Workshop/Station 057 Larra ST YENNORAMr K Kanjou Approved - Delegated Authority21/09/2009

699.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 206,00029 Timothy PL EDENSOR PARKFirstyle Homes Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority04/09/2009

702.1/2009 Shop 50,000680 The Horsley DR SMITHFIELDMadeena's Charcoal Chicken Approved - Delegated Authority22/09/2009

705.1/2009 Vehicle Repair Workshop/Station 050 Chadderton ST CABRAMATTAHyperlube Automotive Services Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

708.1/2009 Car Yard 09/252-256 Hume HWY LANSVALEMotor Exchange Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

710.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 320,00034 Maxwell PL ABBOTSBURYMiss D Novacevska Approved - Delegated Authority04/09/2009

719.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 185,2004 Angelina CRES CABRAMATTAChampion Home Sales Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

720.1/2009 Sign/s 03/118 Ware ST FAIRFIELDCondor Design Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority03/09/2009

726.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 180,00069A Beckenham ST CANLEY VALEChampion Homes NSW Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority21/09/2009

736.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 282,00036 Taralga ST OLD GUILDFORDMs JG Williams Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

745.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 10,0001 Beckenham ST CANLEY VALEMr G E Abou-Haidar Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

747.1/2009 Shop 150,000101-103 John ST CABRAMATTAMs J Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority03/09/2009

748.1/2009 Warehouse 5,00046 Chadderton ST CABRAMATTAMr L K Lim Approved - Delegated Authority17/09/2009

763.1/2009 Granny Flat 35,00050 Smiths AVE CABRAMATTAMrs TKP Nguyen Refused - Delegated Authority11/09/2009

766.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 34,00059 Whitaker ST YENNORAMr QM Pham Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

767.1/2009 Home Business-Food 028 Dalbertis ST ABBOTSBURYMrs ML Umali Approved - Delegated Authority29/09/2009

768.1/2009 Home Business-Food 2,000428 Hamilton RD FAIRFIELD WESTMr N Matti Approved - Delegated Authority23/09/2009

774.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 12,00039 Willowbank CRES CANLEY VALEWestminster Homes Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/09/2009

775.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 10,00031 Solo CRES FAIRFIELDMr MG Vu Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

777.1/2009 Industry 09/19-26 Durian PL WETHERILL PARKSundance Racking Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority03/09/2009

782.1/2009 Outbuilding 10,42027 Shackel AVE OLD GUILDFORDMr J Rabadi Refused - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

784.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 320,00087 Kalang RD EDENSOR PARKMr D Horvat Approved - Delegated Authority10/09/2009

785.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 027 Kalang RD EDENSOR PARKRS Canceri Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority25/09/2009

788.1/2009 Health Consulting Room/s and Residence 3,50046 Arthur ST CABRAMATTADr KC Ma Approved - Delegated Authority07/09/2009

Page 2 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:13:34AM2/10/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/09/2009 to 30/09/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

789.1/2009 Granny Flat 35,000217 John ST CABRAMATTA WESTMr QH Le Refused - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

791.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,000196 Neville ST SMITHFIELDMr M Del Principe Approved - Delegated Authority03/09/2009

793.1/2009 Shop 5,0001 The Crescent FAIRFIELDMr T Q La Approved - Delegated Authority24/09/2009

797.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 300,00049 Macquarie ST FAIRFIELDMr M Gutovic Approved - Delegated Authority23/09/2009

798.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 291,3825 Murrumbidgee ST BOSSLEY PARKMr M Yousif Approved - Delegated Authority15/09/2009

799.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 300,00010 Matthes ST YENNORAMerkarious Construction Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

805.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 272,0006 Angelina CRES CABRAMATTAChampion Homes Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

810.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 240,00037 Landon ST FAIRFIELD EASTMr E Dastan Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

812.1/2009 Community Event 0130 Edensor RD BONNYRIGGBonnyrigg Management Company Approved - Delegated Authority21/09/2009

819.1/2009 Sign/s 24,000138 Hamilton RD FAIRFIELDBP Australia Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority07/09/2009

828.1/2009 Medical Centre 220,00056-70 Canberra ST ST JOHNS PARKSt Johns Park Pharmacy Approved - Delegated Authority01/09/2009

830.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 253,00028 Dalton PL FAIRFIELD WESTMr BH Pham Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

832.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 252,665202A John ST CABRAMATTAClarendon Homes Approved - Delegated Authority09/09/2009

833.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 383,68725 Homestead RD BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSMr J Lim Approved - Delegated Authority23/09/2009

838.1/2009 Shop 5,0001183-1187 The Horsley DR WETHERILL PARKMr T Kemal Approved - Delegated Authority24/09/2009

839.1/2009 Shop 073-79 The Crescent FAIRFIELDMr S Isho Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

841.1/2009 Outbuilding 11,50034 Hawthorn ST ST JOHNS PARKMr J Blaskovic Approved - Delegated Authority04/09/2009

846.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 209,78344 Tangerine ST FAIRFIELD EASTMs L F Tjong Approved - Delegated Authority21/09/2009

848.1/2009 Sign/s 1,00091 Ware ST FAIRFIELDCatholiccare Approved - Delegated Authority09/09/2009

850.1/2009 Outbuilding 3,00010 Edmondson CRES CARRAMARMr Y Abdul Kader Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

857.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 025 Oxford ST SMITHFIELDProject Surveyors Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/09/2009

858.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 209,00012 Lisa CRES BONNYRIGGChampion Homes NSW Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

864.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 42,000489A Smithfield RD PRAIRIEWOODMr S Yako Approved - Delegated Authority18/09/2009

865.1/2009 Fence 9,00064 Ferngrove RD CANLEY HEIGHTSMrs TL Banh Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

866.1/2009 Demolition 7,700121 Neville ST SMITHFIELDMr S Samia Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

867.1/2009 Demolition 2,20045 Dublin ST SMITHFIELDMr S Samia Approved - Delegated Authority08/09/2009

871.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 140,00030 Lisa CRES BONNYRIGGMr M Amir Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

873.1/2009 Two Storey Dwelling 230,0002 Kembla ST WAKELEYMr C Kev Approved - Delegated Authority16/09/2009

875.1/2009 Outbuilding 23,00070 Margaret ST FAIRFIELD WESTMr A T Chau Approved - Delegated Authority16/09/2009

878.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 019A Hampton ST FAIRFIELDBritten & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority16/09/2009

881.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 3,000632 Polding ST BOSSLEY PARKMr V Lamattina Approved - Delegated Authority03/09/2009

882.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 15,00012 Richards RD WAKELEYWizard Home Improvements Approved - Delegated Authority10/09/2009

Page 3 of 4

Fairfield Live DatabasePrinted: 11:13:34AM2/10/2009

Officer: All Records

Est. Cost from: 0

Development Type: Development Application

Approval Type: All Records

To: 999,999,999.00

Fairfield City Council

Application Register - DeterminedDevelopment Applications

1/09/2009 to 30/09/2009

Document Applicant. Property Address. Development Type(1st)External Ref. Determined Status Est. Cost

884.1/2009 Demolition 7,70016 Coolibar ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr BH Tran Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

885.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 169,48042 Lisa CRES BONNYRIGGAllworth Constructions Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

886.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 031 Falmer ST ABBOTSBURYMr R Banbekian Approved - Delegated Authority02/09/2009

890.1/2009 House Raising 80,0004 Mena AVE LANSVALEMr Z Abedine Approved - Delegated Authority23/09/2009

891.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 036A Broad ST CABRAMATTAFrankham Engineering Surveys Approved - Delegated Authority17/09/2009

892.1/2009 Air Conditioning Unit 029 Falmer ST ABBOTSBURYMr E Triantafillou Approved - Delegated Authority02/09/2009

893.1/2009 Outbuilding 7,00021 Maugham CRES WETHERILL PARKMr JW Cruwys DA Determination - Withdrawn28/09/2009

901.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 093 Camden ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMr F Abdo Approved - Delegated Authority15/09/2009

903.1/2009 Single Storey Dwelling 176,05538 Katinka ST BONNYRIGGMr J Cao Approved - Delegated Authority14/09/2009

905.1/2009 Subdivision Strata 0114 Camden ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSLean Lackenby & Hayward Approved - Delegated Authority17/09/2009

911.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 0108-108A Harris ST FAIRFIELDBritten & Assoc Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority21/09/2009

924.1/2009 Demolition 8,00071 Evans ST FAIRFIELD HEIGHTSMs E Oraham Approved - Delegated Authority21/09/2009

927.1/2009 Demolition 5,00055 Wolseley ST FAIRFIELDMr A Alameri Approved - Delegated Authority21/09/2009

932.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 40,0003 Avonlea ST CANLEY HEIGHTSMr F Priyana Approved - Delegated Authority21/09/2009

933.1/2009 Drainage 3,00012 Judith AVE CABRAMATTAMs M T Tran Approved - Delegated Authority23/09/2009

936.1/2009 Outbuilding 7,0006 Alexander ST SMITHFIELDMr M F White Approved - Delegated Authority21/09/2009

938.1/2009 Ceremony 026 Bonnyrigg AVE BONNYRIGGKhmer Community Of NSW Inc Approved - Delegated Authority16/09/2009

943.1/2009 Subdivision Torrens 08 Andrew AVE CANLEY HEIGHTSMr JE Zarb Approved - Delegated Authority22/09/2009

944.1/2009 Outbuilding 11,90033 Lovoni ST CABRAMATTACustomline Carports DA Determination - Withdrawn21/09/2009

946.1/2009 Fence 12,06953 Charles ST SMITHFIELDMr S Lasek Approved - Delegated Authority29/09/2009

951.1/2009 Aboveground Pool 3,00031 Winburndale RD WAKELEYMr GC O'Connor Approved - Delegated Authority23/09/2009

956.1/2009 Demolition 10,00075 The Avenue CANLEY VALEMr R Nguyen Approved - Delegated Authority21/09/2009

975.1/2009 Outbuilding 8,00063 Northumberland ST BONNYRIGG HEIGHTSCPT Corp Pty Ltd Approved - Delegated Authority28/09/2009

987.1/2009 Dwelling Addition/Alteration 15,00012 Winstanley PL MT PRITCHARDMs A M Haramina Approved - Delegated Authority28/09/2009

Total Development Applications Applications: 120 Est. Cost: 38,808,641

Est. Cost:Applications: 120GRAND TOTAL

38,808,641

Page 4 of 4

78

Appendix B Ethics Approval

FACULTY OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT

HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS ADVISORY

PANEL

17 Aug 2009 Application No: 95055 Project Title: Urban Renewal in Cabramatta

Attention: Sang Taing Dear Sang, Thank you for your application requesting approval to conduct research involving humans. The Panel has evaluated your application and upon their recommendation, has attached the decision below. Please be aware that approval is for a period of twelve months from the date of this letter, unless otherwise stated below. All further information/documentation (if any) is to be submitted to FBE HREAP via Student Centre. Please submit originals plus four copies. Email submission will not be recognised. Decision Approved with conditions

Your application is approved; however, there are certain things you must do, before you may conduct your research. Please see below for details, and your responses will assist us in completing your file.

Advisory comments: Research

Item 1

Your application indicates that you may need to obtain one or more Letters of Support before you conduct your research. Letters of Support are required whenever you involve any organisation (other than UNSW) or any individual (other than an employee of UNSW) in your research, whereby: (a) you intend to interview, survey or include employees in a focus group; or (b) your research is wholly or partly funded by any organisation (other than UNSW) or individual (other than an employee of UNSW). Please contact your Supervisor for further direction (if applicable). A Letter of Support must conform to one of the formats indicated in Form 6. Please forward all Letters of Support to HREAP to complete your file.

SYDNEY 2052 AUSTRALIA Email: hreap.contact@fbe.unsw.edu.au

2

Research Research

2 3

Approval is granted to the applicant for a twelve month period from the date of this letter. Any approval to conduct research given to the applicant is done so on the condition that the applicant is at the date of approval: (a) a Student undertaking an approved course of study in the FBE; or (b) a member of Academic Staff in the FBE. If, at any time subsequent to the date of approval and prior to completion of the research project the applicant ceases to be either of (a) and (b) above, then any prior approval given to the applicant to conduct will be deemed to be revoked forthwith. The applicant must inform the FBE HREA Panel immediately upon any change, or possible change, to the applicant’s status that may affect any prior approval given by the Panel to the applicant to conduct research. You need to include the Revocation Statement at the end of the Project Information Statement.

Evaluation Authority: Approving Authority:

Michael Brand (Convener) FBE HREA Panel

Jim Plume Head of School Faculty of the Built Environment