Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario2014 ResultsLatornell Conservation Symposium, November 2014
Presented by: Caitlin Port
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 2Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
PresentationOverview1. Background Information
2. Study Objective
3. Methodology
4. Study Findings
5. Discussion of Results
6. Conclusions
7. Future Work
8. Pictures
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 3Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Background Information Initiated by the Ontario Stone, Sand, and Gravel Association (OSSGA) in 2010◦ Not enough data available on the final land use condition of rehabilitated pits and quarries.
◦ MNRF is not required to track post surrender data◦ Establish and maintain a database
OSSGA Rehabilitation Database◦ Includes 1,457 records◦ Data from ALPS, MNR staff, MNR office visits◦ Limited site information available
Data collection by OSSGA Staff◦ Field visits during 2010‐2014◦ Data stored in a searchable and sortable database◦ Pictures taken for each site
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 4Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Study Objective & Scope• Investigate, assess, and document the rehabilitation status and land use condition of surrendered pits and quarries across Ontario. Only surrendered licences (not active sites or progressive rehabilitation) Licences issued and managed by the MNR under the PCQA or the ARA (does not include unlicensed or revoked sites)
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 5Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
To date:• 701 sites surveyed• 19 complete Regional Rehabilitation profiles• Data for over 100 municipalities
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 6Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Methodology• Database Development & Mapping
• Field Assessments
• Analysis & Report
Step 1 Preliminary Database
Step 2Locate & Map Site
Step 3Site
Assessments
Step 4Data Input &
Analysis
Step 5Report
OSSGA Rehabilitation Study Methodology
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 7Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 8Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Study Reporting
www.ossga.com/publications
Study Results & Discussion
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 10Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Results for Province of Ontario ‐ 2014
25%
21%
15%
10%
9%
9%
5%
3% 2% 1%
Land Use for Rehabiliated Sites in theOverall Study Area (total of 701 Sites)
NaturalAgricultureOpen SpaceWaterResidentialRecreationalIndustrialCommercialOtherInstitutional
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 11Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Results for a Rural geographic area
54%
18%
16%
10%
2%
Land Use for Rehabilitated Sites in theHuron geographic area (a total of 57 sites)
Agriculture
Water
Natural
Open Space
Industrial
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 12Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Results for an Urban geographic area
33%
33%
10%
8%
5%5%
4% 2%
Land Use for Rehabilitated Sites in the City of Toronto (total of 82 Sites)
Residential
Recreational
Institutional
Industrial
Natural
Commercial
Other
Open Space
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 13Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Results for an Urban/Rural Area
20%
20%
15%
13%
10%
8%
8%
3% 3%
Land Use for Rehabilitated Sites in Waterloo geographic area (a total of 39 sites)
AgricultureOpen SpaceCommercialWaterRecreationNaturalIndustrialResidentialInstitutional
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 14Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Discussion of Results1. Pit and quarries are successfully
rehabilitated to a range of productive final land‐uses
2. Pit and quarry rehabilitation supports the provincial priority (PPS 2014) of restoring and improving natural heritage values.
3. Aggregate extraction does not result in the permanent conversion of agricultural land.
4. Rehabilitation is supportive of local land‐use planning objectives.
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 15Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Conclusions1. The final rehabilitation of licensed pits and quarries is
occurring satisfactorily in Ontario.
2. Rehabilitated and surrendered aggregate licences do not leave “open‐scars” on the landscape.
3. Licenced pits and quarries are successfully rehabilitated and reintegrated into rural or urban landforms.
Feb. 27, 2014
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 16Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Future Work1. Continue research & data collection.
2. Assess site‐specific ecology and agricultural productivity.
3. Implement best management practices for rehabilitation.
4. Monitor the long‐term success of rehabilitation
5. Improve data management & retention practices.
Feb. 27, 2014
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 17Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Resultswww.themegallery.com Company Logo
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 18Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Resultswww.themegallery.com Company Logo
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 19Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Resultswww.themegallery.com Company Logo
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 20Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Resultswww.themegallery.com Company Logo
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 21Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Resultswww.themegallery.com Company Logo
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 22Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Resultswww.themegallery.com Company Logo
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 23Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Resultswww.themegallery.com Company Logo23
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 24Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Resultswww.themegallery.com Company Logo
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 25Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Resultswww.themegallery.com Company Logo
Nov. 19,2014 Slide 26Study of Aggregate Site Rehabilitation in Ontario ‐ 2014 Results
Caitlin Port, B.E.S., M.E.S.(Plan)PLANNER
Contact Info: