Upload
albin
View
34
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Study of Air Quality Impacts Resulting from Prescribed Burning on Military Facilities. Karsten Baumann, Mei Zheng, Michael Chang, and Ted Russell. Endangered Species Act. Clean Air Act. Fire Ecology. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Study of Air Quality Impacts Resulting from Prescribed Burning on
Military Facilities
Karsten Baumann,
Mei Zheng,
Michael Chang, and
Ted Russell
Clean Air Act
EndangeredSpecies Act
Fire Ecology
• The endangered Red Cockaded
Woodpecker (RCW) resides only in the
mature long-leaf pine forests of the SE US.
• Most of the forests old and large enough to
support the RCW are on federal and
military lands.
• Long-leaf pine ecosystems have adapted to
natural fire regimes (wildfires in ~3 to 7
year cycles) and now require periodic
burning to maintain health.
• Prescribed burning is a safe and effective
alternative to natural fire regimes.
To what extent does prescribed burning impact local and regional air quality?
VOCs
PM
NOx
O3
Motivation: Fall-line Air Quality Study34.6
34.4
34.2
34.0
33.8
33.6
33.4
33.2
33.0
32.8
32.6
32.4
32.2
32.0
-85.5 -85.0 -84.5 -84.0 -83.5 -83.0 -82.5 -82.0 -81.5
Atlanta
FAQS measurement sites significant point sources point sources w/ CO:NOx > 1
Wind Roses with avg [PM2.5] for
summer & winter in µg m-3
and wind frequency in %.
20x20 km
WansleyYates
Bowen
McDonough
Branch
Scherer
Arkwright
Urquhart
Augusta
Macon
Columbus
Griffin
N
E
S
W9 18
17.9 7.8
N
E
S
W9 18
17.214.1
N
E
S
W9 18
18.215.9
N
E
S
W9 18
16.214.2
N
E
S
W18 36
36.8
Motivation
8
6
4
2
0
m/s
10/26/2001 10/31/2001 11/5/2001 11/10/2001 11/15/2001 11/20/2001 11/25/2001
Time (EST)
Griffin AugustaMacon Columbus
Wind Speed
80
60
40
20
0
µg
/m3
Griffin AugustaMacon Columbus
PM2.5
Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 30 min Average Concentrations during FAQS Phase II (Fall 2001)
Motivation Period around the prescribed burning of HC2 on 12/5/2001
8
6
4
2
0
m/s
12/1/2001 12/3/2001 12/5/2001 12/7/2001 12/9/2001 12/11/2001
Time (EST)
Griffin AugustaMacon Columbus
Wind Speed
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
deg
N
Wind Direction
80
60
40
20
0
µg
/m3
Griffin AugustaMacon Columbus
PM2.5
Motivation Period around the prescribed burning of Q1 on 3/28/2002
8
6
4
2
0
m/s
3/23/2002 3/25/2002 3/27/2002 3/29/2002 3/31/2002 4/2/2002 4/4/2002
Time (EST)
Griffin AugustaMacon Columbus
Wind Speed
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
deg
N
Wind Direction
80
60
40
20
0
µg
/m3
Griffin AugustaMacon Columbus
PM2.5
Motivation Period around the prescribed burning of A9 on 5/21/2001
8
6
4
2
0
m/s
5/15/2002 5/17/2002 5/19/2002 5/21/2002 5/23/2002 5/25/2002 5/27/2002
Time (EST)
Griffin AugustaMacon Columbus
Wind Speed
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
deg
N
Wind Direction
80
60
40
20
0
µg
/m3
Griffin AugustaMacon Columbus
PM2.5
HC2
A9
Q1
NH4Organic Compounds
NO3 Elemental Carbon
Other Elements
SO4
ColumbusOxbow Learning Center
ColumbusWater Works
Average Composition of PM2.5
Observed During FAQS Phase I (July 2000)
1%28%
1%
9%
2%
59%
2%
2%
2%
29%
9%
57%
Average mass = 22 g/m3 Average mass = 19 g/m3
Motivation
Source contributions to organic carbon in PM2.5Pensacola, FL October 1999
Other organic carbon30%
Wood combustion
39%
Meat cooking 6%
Vegetative detritus
2%
Gasoline exhaust
3%
Diesel exhaust
20%
More Motivation
Zheng et al., ES&T 2002
In the continental U.S. prescribed burns and forest fires contribute ~37 % to the total direct fine PM emissions of ~1 Mio t per year*
* Nizich et al., EPA Report 454/R-00-002 (NTIS PB2000-108054), RTP, NC, 2000
Objectives• To quantitatively characterize pollutants emitted from prescribed burning,
with emphasis on the detailed chemical composition of fine PM at OLC;• To study diversity of sites:
- Fort Benning as primary study site, including PM source
apportionment
and in situ gas phase sampling.
- Fort Gordon, Shaw and Eglin AFB as secondary study sites to include
in situ gas phase sampling only.• To identify conserved markers for biomass burning in ambient air;• To determine the contribution of gaseous precursors towards secondary
ozone and fine PM formation;• To determine how concentrations and chemical compositions differ with
conditions of burning (such as open flame versus smoldering), type of
biomass burned, moisture in the biomass, and season (summer versus fall).
Fort Benning
3’
4’
a/c
11’
8’
Stair step
4’ 14’
Guy wired8m Towertilt down
10’ Gate
45’ x 40’ Fence
N
10’ x 12’ Shelter
4 additional 20 A circuit breakers
33’ x 7’ level Platform~ 1’ above ground
4 quadruple outlets on individual breakers
• Focus on Fort Benning in collaboration with WW & CSU utilizing Columbus OLC site;
• OLC site upgrade for PM source apportionment and in situ gas phase sampling started;
• Contacts to site operators and VOC sample takers established, specific training in progress.
VOC
POC
PCM
Gas
Met
Particle Composition Monitor “PCM”Channel 1:
NH3
Na+, K+, NH4+, Ca+2
Channel 2:
HF, HCl, HONO, HNO3, SO2,
HCOOH, CH3COOH, (COOH)2
F-, Cl-, NO3-, SO4
=,
HCOO-, CH3COO-, C2O4=
Channel 3:
EC, OC, WSOC, “SVOC”
Additional higher resolution
CO, NO, NOy, O3, PM-mass,
and basic meteorology
High-Vol Sampling and GC/MS Analyses
Quantification of >100 Particle-phase Organic Compounds
n-alkanes, branched alkanes, cycloalkanesn-alkanoic acids, n-alkenoic acidsalkanedioic acidsPAHs, oxy-PAHs
retenesteraneshopanesresin acids
pimaric acidabietic acidsandaracopimaric acid
aromatic acidslevoglucosan
POC
Canister Sampling and GC/FID Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds
VOC
Subcontract with long-term collaborator Prof. Don Blake, UC Irvine, CA 92697 http://fsr10.ps.uci.edu/GROUP/group.html
C2-C6 n-alkanes, alkenes, branched alkenes, alkynesisoprene
Cyclic compoundsmonoterpenes (--pinene)
Aromatics, organic nitrates, halogenated speciesmethylchloride
Quantification of >60 compounds, incl. CO2 for “fire” samples
Linking Chemical Composition of Emissions with Prescribed Burn Conditions…• Combustion: open flame versus smoldering• Biomass type and moisture • Seasonal differences: summer versus fall/winter• Site specific differences: background versus plume
…Requires close collaboration with individual facilities’ personnel
Eglin AFBJohn Wolfe AQ Program Manager (850) 882-7677 [email protected]
Shaw AFBTerry Madewell AQ Program Manager (803) 895-9996
Fort GordonStephen Willard AQ Program Manager (706) [email protected]
Fort BenningPolly GustafsonAQ Program Manager (706) [email protected]
Criteria, SOP and Documentation of PB Burn map Prioritized list RCW data base GIS digital system FY table & summary Drought conditions (KBDI) Interagency communication GFC Fire Weather Forecast
BURN FORM
• location & size of burn unit
• phys & biol character
• assets to protect
• hazards & risks
• personnel
Ignition
Weather observations andT, RH, WS, WD measurements during peak fire (1200-1400 LT)
FIRE WEATHER INFO FORM
• T, RH, WS, WD, BL height
• fuel moisture, days since rain
• O3 forecast, SDI
Delineation of burn area Smoke Screening Procedure Post-burn evaluation
• Photographs
• Smoke Screening Form
• Smoke Impact Map
• Post Burn Monitoring Form
Observations from smoldering phase??
Sampling Strategy• Met & gas-phase parameters are measured continuously at OLC.
• PM & VOC samples are taken at OLC according to Ft Benning’s PB schedule.
• Burn boss determines upwind/downwind location and takes 3 VOC samples:Upwind / Close to burn unit / Downwind
[ Note, these samples don’t need to be taken simultaneously! ]
• A maximum of 3 VOC samples are analyzed for each open flaming and smoldering/glowing stage; i.e. max 6 samples per burn.
• Assuming that flaming stage ends at sunset when smoldering phase begins, problem is, how to coordinate the VOC can sampling for smoldering phase??
• Post-processing of continuous met & gas data, as well as local weather data will determine if OLC site can be considered upwind or downwind from burn unit; if indifferent, then neither VOC nor PM samples will be analyzed.
• It is expected to capture 6 plume events, 4 in Fall 2002 and 2 in Summer 2003.
• VOC analyses limited to max 36 VOC can samples.
Sampling Strategyrevised 9/13/02
• Met & gas-phase parameters are measured continuously at OLC.
• PM & VOC samples are taken at OLC according to Ft Benning’s PB schedule.
• Burn boss determines downwind location and takes 4 VOC samples:Before ignition / Close to flaming burn unit / Downwind / Upwind[ Note, these samples need/should not be taken simultaneously! ]
• A maximum of 3 VOC samples are analyzed for - the full burn stage [most of the unit in open flaming], and - the late burn stage [most of unit in smoldering/glowing stage]; i.e.
a total maximum of 8 VOC samples (incl. 2 upwind) are analyzed per burn.
• Assuming that flaming ends at sunset when only smoldering occurs, problem is, how to coordinate the VOC can sampling for smoldering phase??
• Post-processing of continuous met & gas data, as well as local weather data will determine if OLC site can be considered upwind or downwind from burn unit; if indifferent, then neither VOC nor PM samples will be analyzed.
• It is expected to capture 6 plume events, 4 in Winter 2002/03 and 2 in Spring 2003.
• VOC analyses limited to max 48 VOC can samples.
VOC Can Sampling Technical Details
GUIDELINES FOR TAKING VOC AIR SAMPLES
• Remove Yellow/black end cap from port connector.
• Raise sample canister above and in front of you facing the wind.
• When the canister is full, open the valve one full turn counter clockwise, then close the valve firmly clockwise.
• Fill out canister label and sampling record sheet provided.
• Store boxes in a dry location with arrows up.
• Please make a copy of the completed sampling record sheet And mail to Air Resources Engineering Center
Georgia Institute of TechnologySchool of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences575 14th Street NW, lab 1376Atlanta, GA 30318
Or fax to (404) 385-0795
• Please ship box with cans & documents back to (use pre-printed label that should read)
Murray D C McEachernDepartment of ChemistryB35 Rowland HallUniversity of California, IrvineIrvine, CA, 92697-2025Phone (949) 824-4854
Fax (949) 824-2905
Deliverables and Products• Sep ’02 OLC site modifications, implementations, and preparations completed;
• Dec ’02 1st progress report describing the sampling in Fall 2002;
• Mar ’03 2nd progress report with prelim results of Fall sampling chemical analysis;
• Aug ‘03 3rd progress report with detailed analysis of Fall ‘02 & Summer ‘03 results,
including improved site specific prescribed burning emission factors;
• Oct ‘03 Final Report with Recommendations,
– reporting the detailed chemical composition and concentrations from prescribed burns,
– comparing plume emissions to the background samples,
– assessing the VOC emissions at three sites, and
– identifying specific burning practices with resultant air quality impacts.
• Beyond complement ongoing SERDP, State of GA, and US EPA research projects.
Deliverables and Products
revised 9/13/02
• Oct ’02 OLC site modifications, implementations, and preparations completed;
• Mar ’03 1st progress report describing the sampling in Winter 2002;
• June ’03 2nd progress report with prelim results of Winter & Spring sampling;
• Sep ‘03 3rd progress report with detailed analysis of Winter & Spring results,
including improved site specific prescribed burning emission factors;
• Dec ‘03 Final Report with Recommendations,
– reporting the detailed chemical composition and concentrations from prescribed burns,
– comparing plume emissions to the background samples,
– assessing the VOC emissions at three sites, and
– identifying specific burn practices with resultant air quality impacts.
• Beyond complement ongoing SERDP, State of GA, and US EPA research projects.
For more information:
• Dr. Karsten Baumann (PI) [email protected]
• Dr. Mei Zheng [email protected]
• Dr. Michael Chang [email protected]
• Dr. Ted Russell [email protected]